Liked most what Stephen said. 5:55 Its all about creating solutions to problems. Programmers should embrace AI as a tool to help them create solutions to existing problems.
@tillcarlos
Ай бұрын
Yes, totally!
@rluijk
Ай бұрын
My guess, new language will emerge, helping in the encapsulation of a professor (X) in a box. The language will be used as guardrails, constraining the "raw" intelligence in the "box". A small starting point for me, is importing agents in scripts, finding the right operator overloading to make nice syntax that are more aligned with programming around intelligence.
@tillcarlos
Ай бұрын
Interesting idea. Where do you see this play out first?
@rluijk
Ай бұрын
@@tillcarlos well, in daily life, in my on code base, but more general I assume your refer too. (-; That is an interesting question. I think it will emerge from a mix of research, concepts discovered, developed, and step by step those are getting "merged" into languages. Like we went from assembly to python, abstracting away from the hardware more and more. I guess it can start as syntactic sugar around agents, as you can see happening with some DSL concepts in langchain/ langgraph and the like. I guess my point is, abstractions become language.
@KrutoshReviews
Ай бұрын
0:42 I completely disagree, I hope you allow a contradictory statement. The gap between mediocre developers and strong developers will decrease significantly. The goal for the tech industry is to abstract the technology for wider adoption. Current developers rarely work on why instruction sets are not executed efficiently on processor chips. This is because programming languages are an abstraction over operation codes or assembly language.
@tillcarlos
Ай бұрын
Yes, please, Krutosh! Interesting that you bring this up! If your point is true: why do we have such a bad job market for devs right now? And why are very skilled devs still in high demand? Or let me ask differently: Have you seen your theory play out in the real world?
@KrutoshReviews
Ай бұрын
@@tillcarlos Excellent question. We are still in the early stages of the AI transformation. It is far too premature to make judgments based on the current market data. Many companies and engineers are still unaware of the potential. As engineers, we need to embrace the fact that everyone will become extremely proficient problem solvers using technology because of the barrier to entry will be much lower.
@Meshalleez
Ай бұрын
@@KrutoshReviewsI can relate to your point. I don't have a programming background but am currently building a mobile application using Flutterflow and AI, something that I would've never have imagined of being capable of doing. Its true, the barrier to entry is lower and is expected to be lower as the technology improves. Programmers should embrace AI as a useful tool rather than a threat to their careers. I also believe that only the creative programmers, those with a deep understanding of programming and use those skills to create solutions to problems will survive. But the lazy programmers who only want to get hired and get a paycheck may find it difficult to stay afloat.
@KrutoshReviews
Ай бұрын
@@Meshalleez Good for you. I want the world where tertiary skills are not as important as creative thinking to solve the problem. I want critical thinkers to win, not someone who has given up everything in their life to become expert at one thing and then boast about monopolising the market.
Пікірлер: 10