India's population wasn't smart enough to create the industrial revolution. We can see how China has been industrialized. India has been independent for nearly a century and I am going to be real, if people from a small island can carve boats and sail half way across the world and dominate a much larger country with much larger population, then the country wasn't doing well to start with.. What is more realistic is there was trade between the elites. India had infrastructure improved, and England got resources to start the industrial revolution which is why you have technology to do things such as upload this video.
@asiareveled
4 сағат бұрын
"I am going to be real, if people from a small island can carve boats and sail half way across the world and dominate a much larger country with much larger population, then the country wasn't doing well to start with." Never crossed my mind but makes sense.
@asiareveled
4 сағат бұрын
This is sad! What's really troubling is that Indians seem to suffer from colonial mentality, that's probably why they are still subservient to the west. While the trend of anti-imperialism is growing in the developing world, India seems slow to catch up with the trend.
@lindaho4554
Сағат бұрын
@@EB-jf5oi in China, when an aggrieved calls for justice, there would be an investigation and an accounting to accord justice to the victim. It’s a valued service to the people to free them from oppression. That’s what class struggle is all about. Whereas in India there is no such thing as justice and service to inferior people, such as the poor and the lower caste, the Dalits. It’s service to the bidder, and the highest bidder, the rich and the powerful. In India the aggrieved is slapped, kicked and whipped into silence for having the gall to point a finger at the perpetrator. The law enforcer and the court system take the view that the aggrieved most often the poor and of lower caste are troublemakers disturbing the peace and order of the community. [For example, questions are asked, opinion made, how can the lawmaker (member of the legislature), a judge, a prosecutor, a lawyer or a public servant be corrupt, or that their son committed a crime of rape or their unmarried daughter be nor a virgin]. For that puritanical oppressive view they hold, they are handsomely rewarded by and for the service and influence they wield or perform. Another example, Brahmins abhor committing sins among themselves, i.e. in the same caste, yet they allow themselves to commit crimes against the Dalits. They hold the view that the Dalits are not human, but beasts, and can be treated as such, and their crimes are absolved in court or temple. Folks say: adding water to milk is not a crime, but adding milk to water is a crime.
@lindaho4554
Сағат бұрын
@@EB-jf5oi the UK no longer rules the waves, nor see the sunrise and sunset on the same day. It is what it is today (living on past glory of 200 years of colonialism, loot, plunder and exploitation) for the large community of Indians, and for the likes of people like Braverman and Sunak.
@lindaho4554
Сағат бұрын
@@asiareveled it’s the upper caste, the Brahmins, and the nouveau rich and educated, who has the snobbish colonial mentality. The lower caste, the Dalits, are oblivious to know themselves as human as the Brahmins. When walking under the hot bright sun, the Dalits (in especially the women) are not allowed to overtake and walk in front of the Brahmins nor step on their shadows. The wrath of the Brahmin is incurred (like it’s the end of the world!) if his shadow is crossed or overlapped by the Dalit’s.
Пікірлер: 15