PRaNAm Swami Ji 🙏 everyone does have an out of body experience while dreaming, as one is, really speaking lying on the bed snoring away to glory, but traveling and doing all kinds of things using the dream body. And when that body is thirsty the water one has kept on the bedside table is useless. It needs 'dream water '. And further in the dreamless sleep the poor fellow simply doesn't even know that he exists until waking 😇 . So it's evident in our daily existence itself than one can leave the present body and acquire another. And also one EXIST even when the body becomes redundant, as though, in deep sleep. Alternatively the law of conservation of energy states - energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change it's name, form and function. Existence is all there's. The ISness. Body IS, chair IS, ....But, yes, to get the existence expressed there has to be Jiva which gets existence alongwith the same as consciousness. This pure consciousness is not available for any transactions, and hence we think, one dies. 😊
@abhakochar6683
7 ай бұрын
Instead of going into the nitty gritty … let’s concentrate on the deeper meaning of this lecture .. You are not merely this body … but much more …. Pranams to all seekers ..🙏🙏
@rb-ct4ri
17 күн бұрын
❤
@sumanghosh3237
7 ай бұрын
Lack of our own Self knowledge Create the barrier to accept the truth that there is only continuation in creation through different body and relationships until go beyond birth death cycle. Pronam Maharaj 🙏
@raghubhupasamudram5047
7 ай бұрын
Pranaam Swamiji. This topic cannot be better explained.We are indeed blessed.
@rupeshchitari
7 ай бұрын
Logically accepted 😊
@swamivedantanandapuri1322
7 ай бұрын
Pranaam maharaj🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@anagha.aniruddha16
7 ай бұрын
Namaskar Swami Sarvapriyanandaji Maharaj 🙏🏻
@shivsivaram9872
8 ай бұрын
Pranam to Sri Thakurji and to all
@suresh3292
7 ай бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@ashachhapolia3913
7 ай бұрын
🙏🙏
@sandeepkumarkhuntia8839
7 ай бұрын
After death, we will not have thinking capacity and the question will never be raised. We can only feel ourselves as individual being with free flow.
@dayanidhi9391
5 ай бұрын
Why do you say we don't have thinking capacity after death? Of course we do. The atman (pure consciousness/true self) in the subtle body, leaves the physical body. And one part of the subtle body is the mind, and because both the subtle body and the mind continue to exist after the death of the physical body, then the capacity to think with that mind is still there.
@avaregmi5248
2 ай бұрын
I had near death experience under water in 2011 and my knowing is that I as me in this life existed although I could not see my body. But the mind was alive and I knew I was dead.
@rb-ct4ri
17 күн бұрын
Can you elaborate more about your experience, if possible?
@mayaahmed
7 ай бұрын
Even the person is mithya. Person will also die. Everything that is created will die.
@davedonot2788
7 ай бұрын
There is no creation only manifestation, what is there to create from other than consciousness
@mayaahmed
7 ай бұрын
Consciousness does not leave the body when a person dies.
@mayaahmed
7 ай бұрын
You could say the body leaves the conciousness
@madhukannang3066
7 ай бұрын
While taking snap you exist as such we expect after death. Ayam Athma Brahma . .your existence doesn't have neither beginning nor End. Rather death is real beginning. We are trespassers here.
@balagopalramakrishnan8048
7 ай бұрын
PRaNAm Swami Ji, this exactly is the question Nachiketas asked Yama Dharma Raja as the third boon. So the best answer would be - please check the Book, Kathopanishaad. A very detailed answer is given. But, yes, self study of the same is futile. Instead listen it from a Guru who is both a shrothriya and brahmanishta.
@amolmangalmurti3013
7 ай бұрын
🙏🏻 One question comes to my mind is does the atma leaves bcos the body stops functioning Or Bcos atma decides to leave first resulting in stoppage of functions of body organs?
@jaydescribe
7 ай бұрын
Atma can never leave, because it never arrives. It always is
@wthomas5697
7 ай бұрын
It's a function of the body. The people that are claiming all this "always is" nonsense have no idea what they are talking about.
@jaydescribe
7 ай бұрын
@@wthomas5697 yes. Because you know what you're talking about. Congratulations. That's so great. You won!
@mrityunjaymishra733
7 ай бұрын
Atman is not related to the body Na Atman bhavashu - astavakra Gita.
@sanjoyghose1952
7 ай бұрын
All talk about Atman etc. are bogus and created by opportunists, who want to dupe laymen to earn livelihood. Even holy hindu scripture Gita, which is mother of all talks on atman, is not sure and says, it is quite possible that body and consciousness take birth together and die together repeatedly. The sloka saying so, is as under अथ चैनं नित्यजातं नित्यं वा मन्यसे मृतम् । तथापि त्वं महाबाहो नैवं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ जातस्य हि ध्रुवो मृत्युर्ध्रुवं जन्म मृतस्य च । तस्मादपरिहार्येऽर्थे न त्वं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ Hence, be ready for total annihilation on death.
@rrangarajan5979
7 ай бұрын
கேள்வியும் பதிலின் சாரமும் தமிழில் இறப்பிற்கு பின்னரும் நான் இருக்கிறேன் என்பது எப்படி? அழிவில்லாது மாறாது இருக்கிறேன் என்பது எப்படி நிரூபணமாகும் என விளக்குங்கள்? இது நல்ல கேள்வி நான் இருக்கிறேன் என்பதனால் தான் இந்த கேள்வி எழுகிறது. மரணத்தின் அனுபவத்தை யாரும் அனுபவித்ததில்லை. நான் இருக்கிறேன் என்பதை இருக்கின்ற எல்லோரும் உணர்கிறோம். நான் இல்லை என்று சொல்லுவது முற்றிலும் முரணானது. நான் இல்லை என்று யாரால் தான் சொல்லக்கூடும். அது ஒரு குற்றமுள்ள வாக்கியமாகி விடுமே. எனவே அது ஒருபோதும் இயலாத முரண்பாடான ஒன்று. மரணத்தின் அனுபவம் யாருக்கும் இல்லை. மரணத்தில் உடல் அழிகிறது அதனால் நான் இல்லை என்று கருதமுடியுமா? நேரடி அனுபவம் இல்லை என்றால் என்ன? நானதான் நிறையப் பேர்கள் இறப்பதைப் பார்த்திருக்கிறேன் அதற்குப் பிறகு அவர்கள் இருப்பதற்கான அனுபவம் எனக்கு இல்லையே என்று நீங்கள் கூறலாம். இந்த விவாதத்திலும் தவறு உள்ளது. எப்படி என்றால் நான் இருக்கிறேன் என்று ஒவ்வொருவரும் அனுபவிப்பது அவர்களுடைய நானைப் பற்றியது. என்னுடைய நான் உன்னுடைய நானிலிருந்து வேறானது. உன்னுடைய நானைப் பற்றி நான் அறிந்துகொள்ளவில்லை.அடுத்தவரின் இருப்பை உடலாக அதன் செயலாக அனுபவப்படுத்திக் கொள்கிறேன். அதனால் நான் என்னுடைய நானைப் போலவே அவர்களும் அவரவருடைய நானைப் பெற்றிருக்கிறார்கள் என்று கருதிக் கொள்கிறேன். இந்த உடல் உள்ளவரை இது சரியாகப் பொருந்துகிறது. ஆனால் இதை மற்றவரது இறப்பிற்குப் பின்னால் நீட்டிப்பு செய்து கருதுவதில் பிழை உள்ளது. இறந்தவரது உடலின் இருப்பை பேச்சை என்னால் உணரமுடியவில்லை என்னைப் பொருத்தவரை இறந்தவரது இருப்பு எனக்கு அனுபவமாகவில்லை அதனால் இறந்தவருக்கும் அவரது இருப்பு அனுபவம் ஆகாது என்று கருத்தை நீட்டம் செய்வது பிழையானது. உதாரணமாக இந்த மேசை எரிந்துவிட்ட பின்னாலும் நான் இருக்கிறேனா என்ற கேள்வி வந்தால் அந்த கேள்வியை என்ன மடத்தனமான கேள்வி என்று ஒதுக்கி விடுவோம். ஏனென்றால் மேசை ஒரு பொருள் . அறிவுணர்வு உடைய என்னுடன் அதற்கு என்ன தொடர்பு? எப்படி இப்படிக் கேட்கலாம் என்பீர்கள் ஏனென்றால் நான் என்பது இங்கு மேசையாக கருதப்படவில்லை ஆனால் உடலானது நானாகக் கருதப்படுகிறது. உடலை நானாக தவறான அடையாளக் கண்ணோட்டம் கொள்வதால்தான் இந்தப் பிழை ஏற்படுகிறது. உடலும் ஒரு பொருள்தான் எனக் கொண்டு விசாரியுங்கள்
@goranmancevski5550
7 ай бұрын
Thankk You for putting this together
@madhukannang3066
7 ай бұрын
No difference between Male and female for Athma. What is within grass , worms , animals et cetera is within you. So also that is content of God and cythanya. Ornament words can't reveal the reality
@ambhat3953
7 ай бұрын
I have lot of respect for Swamiji, but i think he should refrain from saying islam, xtianity etc has same spiritual aspect/questions as orientals had. It feels more of a politically correct (and unnecessary) statement. Pranam to Swamiji
@arindamghatak
7 ай бұрын
Agreed. Clearly he hasn't read their holy books.
@seemaburman5535
7 ай бұрын
Agreed
@shatabdabasu505
7 ай бұрын
It's not about political correctness, but philosophical correctness Which applies to most proto, primitive tribal religion to the himalayan hights of advaita vedanta
@arindamghatak
7 ай бұрын
@@shatabdabasu505 you are right, but in the comments above, we are talking about Christianity and Islam.
@ambhat3953
7 ай бұрын
@@shatabdabasu505 proto ..primitive tribal religion....hahahah all those words borrowed form west's view of other country and trying to force fit the logic here. Typical nonsense
@shashicolaco5851
7 ай бұрын
"I" only exist when "I" am aware of my existence, " I " am aware of the waking world,, " I " am.aware of the dream world...but " I " am not aware of the deep sleep world...yet Awareness Exist... So "I" is just an identity created by the body mind complex....when we die there is no body mind complex... like a computer needs hardware & software for it to function,,, without the hardware the software is non functional and without the software the hardware is useless.....so the computer only exist when both are functioning simultaneously.
@chandandigumarthy9652
7 ай бұрын
Did you think through enough before typing this? because your claims doesn't make any sense Your claim: " I " am not aware of the deep sleep world Correction: If you are not aware then how did you know there is something called deep sleep? You know it because you were aware of it, but the problem is that there was nothing to be aware of. You are aware of the nothingness in the deep sleep. Your claim: So "I" is just an identity created by the body mind complex Correction: The "I" identity created by body and mind complex is called ego (its not awareness). I think you are confusing between ahamkara (ego) and awareness. You are the aware witness of this "I" identity as well. Even the "I" identity which you have when you are awake or in dreams is witnessed by you (the awareness). That is why the phrase "mano, budhi, ahamkara, chitta, ni na aham (I am not ego)" came. Your claim: so the computer only exist when both are functioning simultaneously Correction: Death of computer hardware doesn't mean death of software is what being discussed here. A software can still exist without hardware (may be on a cd or external hdd). After the death of body (hardware), we can't do some activities like eating, drinking, walking. So you are right that worldly functioning needs both, no one denies it. But death of body (hardware) doesn't mean you (software) do not exist. [Your computer analogy would be more accurate if you even take electricity into consideration because we will have scope to compare electricity with awareness, mind stuff with software and physical body with hardware]
@pvgopiabnle
7 ай бұрын
Thatst❤
@rustysmalls
12 күн бұрын
Incorrect. The analogy of the computer is fallacious because both hardware and software are related by a being. The " I" of consciousness is prior to the mind and the brain, formless and not created. This is why there is the hard problem of consciousness, because scientists cannot understand how the brain gives rise to the qualities of awareness. Billions of connections and electrical impulses is not enough to explain this phenomenon, the mechanism by which consciousness comes about is elusive. There are some scientists who believe consciousness is not localised in the brain but everywhere and nowhere, because it is formless and can't be properly understood using the scientific method. This all depends on a person's worldview, whether a person is a materialist or not
@sanjoyghose1952
7 ай бұрын
All religions talk about afterlife, simply because foundations of all religions are to show carrots of good afterlife to believers in exchange of good conduct. Hence, your logic that all religions promise after life and hence, afterlife is there, is not acceptable. According to Charbak philosophy, body and consciousness generate together due to some peculiar combination of five elements in a particular proportion, which is unknown. Even Gita, says there is possibility that body and consciousness take birth together and die together. Consciousness and body are different, but that does not prove that consciousness remains after death. According to non-dual Vedanta, every consciousness merges with Bramhan, and hence, there is no possibility of existence of individual consciousness after death. Britha-Aranyak Upanishad also says so. However, dual-Vedanta gives hope of existence of individual consciousness for ever. But, that could be for attracting devotees to temples, for otherwise economic viability of temples would get ruined. But, Sarbapriyanandaji, are you afraid to think that you could get totally annihilated on death? What is there in life that you are so much in favour of existence of individual consciousness for ever? Even if it remains, external form could be that of dog, cow, reptiles, whale, elephant, creatures of marina trench etc. Will you like it more than annihilation? I would definitely prefer annihilation.
@chandandigumarthy9652
7 ай бұрын
Hmm .. You need some time before taking up Vedanta, your mind is not calm yet. Take your time in your own spiritual process, nothing needs to be done urgently. Even if you don't want any spiritual stuff its ok, no one has problem with it. But please mention valid stuff in your conversation Every line you spoke has a mistake, jumping to conclusions, lets see few of them now: 1. He never said it is true because many religions said so, but he is saying that many people noticed it that way, many people observe them to be some "inner beings" rather than the outer physical body. This is based on direct experience of many folks on the planet, books are just a secondary information 2. You said "Charvakas particular proportion of 5 elements is unknown". But this is very illogical on charvakas part to claim it is generated by 5 elements but they do not know proportions. Isn't it is like saying "we know God created us but how he created us is unknown". Both are meaning less 3. Gita never spoke of body and consciousness taking birth together and dying together, instead it says consciousness cannot be killed by anything and it doesn't die. It changes bodies like we change the clothes. 4. You said: "According to non-dual Vedanta, every consciousness merges with Bramhan", what you stated is wrong. Non-dual Vedanta says "Consciousness is Brahman", there is no merging. Because the act of merging needs 2 entities, but non-dual means not-two, so nothing to merge! 5. Even if you prefer annihilation, you cannot be annihilated. That is summary of Vedanta and that was the discovery. There is nothing for Sarbapriyanandaji to be afraid of in it. He is a teacher and he is teaching it. 6. You said: "What is there in life that you are so much in favour of existence of individual consciousness for ever". Where did you hear such a thing? I never heard anything "existence of individual consciousness for ever" in non-dual Vedanta. You are confusing between a lot of other things.
@sanjoyghose1952
7 ай бұрын
@@chandandigumarthy9652 I give answer to your comments in seriatim. 1. It is immaterial what Sarbapriyananda has told line by line, but he tried to justify existence of consciousness after death quoting other religions, including Hinduism. No religion could ever exist without promise of after life. 2 Charbak philosophy is highly logical and it is duly mentioned in holy Gita. Read chapter 16, दैवासुरसम्पद्विभागयोगः 3. Hindu scripture, Gita has said that it is quite possible, consciousness and body take birth and die together. Here is the sloka. अथ चैनं नित्यजातं नित्यं वा मन्यसे मृतम् । तथापि त्वं महाबाहो नैवं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ जातस्य हि ध्रुवो मृत्युर्ध्रुवं जन्म मृतस्य च । तस्मादपरिहार्येऽर्थे न त्वं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ 4. Non-dual Vedanta says, all consciousnesses merge with Bramhan and get annihilated. Read conversation between Yagabalka and his wife Maitray in Brihat-aranyak Upanishad. 5. Dual vedanta only talk about continuation of individual consciousness, Vishnu etc, and material for ever. But, that is done to attract people to maintain economic viability of temples, orders etc. 6. Lastly, I asked Sarbapriyananda, why he was so much anxious to say to audience that consciousness continues for ever. By giving example, I wanted to show to Sarbapriyananda that he could be in great trouble, if his own consciousness continues after death. All your observations hence, stand bulldozed. Ball is now in your court to reply.
@shatabdabasu505
7 ай бұрын
And it's not britha aranyak Upanishads it's Brihadaranyak upanishad Give Reference from B upanishad, where does it says they consciousness die come on give atleast one ref from any upanishad. Leave about upanishad and gita I highly doubt you have gone through even any single advaita work Or else no man is so dumb that after reading upanishad he will come to conclusion that consciousness (atma) dies with body Sorry I cant take this, I hardly find some comedian in vedanta culture Thank you. 😂
@shatabdabasu505
7 ай бұрын
BG 2.20: The soul is neither born, nor does it ever die; nor having once existed, does it ever cease to be. The soul is without birth, eternal, immortal, and ageless. It is not destroyed when the body is destroyed.
@shatabdabasu505
7 ай бұрын
न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचि नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूय: | अजो नित्य: शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे ||
Пікірлер: 103