How the hell is this floating at 2k views? It’s an absolutely perfect explanation.
@suneelyadav6614
2 жыл бұрын
6.7k
@parthchaturvedi1681
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks , it helped me win a reddit arguement.
@RealChemistryVideos
3 жыл бұрын
Haha, that's the main reason I do what I do. Take that other redditor.
@shawncorrigan7514
2 жыл бұрын
Omg why am I here for the same exact reason
@aimanhakim4935
2 жыл бұрын
LMAOO😂
@bassfischer4273
Жыл бұрын
BY FAR the finest explanation of the fission dynamics of Uranium and Plutonium atomic bombs that I've ever seen. Thank you!
@mortenknudsen9155
3 жыл бұрын
This is so well made and explained, Thank you. My brain itch is finally gone :P
@ChimpFromSpace
2 ай бұрын
Just the explosive lens itself is an insane feat of engineering. Using geometry, and chemicals with different combustion speeds to turn outwardly expanding explosions into an inwardly collapsing implosion. Even mechanics of the neutron source at the center of the imploding core is also fascinating, and genius. For better or for worse, the people who worked on the original Manhattan Project were very very smart, to say the least.
@markotrieste
Жыл бұрын
Conventional PWR reactors run on about 5% enriched uranium. 20% enrichment is considered "high assay low enriched uranium" and is used in smaller naval reactors.
@drtidrow
9 ай бұрын
Not sure, but subs may use even more highly enriched uranium to keep the reactor small and easier to fit inside the pressure hull. Also, reactors for the newest subs are designed to last the life of the sub, so need more fissile uranium to start with in order to last the 40 or so years they expect the sub to be in service.
@fieryweasel
6 күн бұрын
When it comes to enrichment, an important thing to keep in mind is that the difficulty lies in getting STARTED with enrichment. Once you get to 4-5% enrichment, you're basically 80% of the way there. You need massive numbers of centrifuges (if that's how you're enriching it) to get very low-enriched uranium. Once you have that, a very small number is all you need to keep going, using only as much power as a grocery store. While 4-5% is useful for a reactor, it's VERY difficult to locate and identify a facility converting LEU to HEU. You don't need massive power feeds or tons of floor space. A few dozen easily-concealed centrifuges is all you need. Additional fact: the reason UF6 is used (other than being the only uranium compound that's gaseous as semi-reasonable temperatures and pressures) is the F is a compound that, by and large, only has one isotope found in nature and as such is one less mass difference to deal with.
@ethanbautista523
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much it really helped me on my project.
@christoskokkolis5110
2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video and very clear explanation, thank you!
@SupernaturalByDesign
9 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation!! Thank you!!
@drtidrow
9 ай бұрын
To clarify: a critical mass is when each fission causes one additional fission so the fission reactions stay at a stable rate (what happens inside a nuclear reactor), a subcritical mass produces less than one additional fission per fission event thus the reaction dying off, and a supercritical mass has more than one additional fission per fission event, so the reaction rate keeps growing. Nuclear bombs, when they detonate, create a highly supercritical mass so that the reaction rate accelerates extremely rapidly and fissions a large fraction of the uranium or plutonium present.
@aktchungrabanio6467
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! A very educational video.
@drtidrow
9 ай бұрын
8:30 Another clarification: Most plutonium 239 is created in nuclear reactors, where there are lots of neutrons flying around. Some of the Pu-239 formed will absorb an additional neutron forming Pu-240. This isotope of plutonium has a very high spontaneous fission rate, which means there are always extra neutrons flying around inside a chunk of Pu-239. As a result, you have to bring the subcritical pieces of a bomb core together very fast into supercritical mass before those neutrons can get the chain reaction going and blow things apart. This turns out to be much faster than a gun-type design can produce, so they had to switch to implosion. As a bonus, implosion creates a much denser supercritical mass and thus allows much more of the plutonium present to fission. IIRC, Pu-239 also has a higher spontaneous fission rate than U-235, which didn't help. This made the gun-type plutonium bomb design almost impractically long to begin with, then they discovered the problem with Pu-240's fission rate, which made it impossible to make a gun-type bomb of any reasonable size. You can find pics online of prototype "Thin Man" plutonium bomb casings that they made before the spontaneous fission problem nixed the whole design. They're roughly twice as long as the Little Boy uranium bomb, and that still wasn't long enough to work.
@davidgrisez
Жыл бұрын
This is an interesting description of the Teller-Ulam design for a thermonuclear bomb. At least public information indicates that this is a likely possibility for the thermonuclear bomb. Us human beings are really great at making tremendously destructive devices.
@Mr.Nefarioussness
Жыл бұрын
Im drunk asf & I understood this perfectly wtff lol I feel like I just unlocked a new knowledge😂
@davidnaugler73
Жыл бұрын
The Born-Oppenheimer approximation is central to understand how Nuclear Bombs Work. BO says nuclei move at least 1/2000 times the speed of electrons. Hence nuclear fusion begins when the electron temperature is high enough to activate D-D or D-T fusion.
@TimRobertsen
3 ай бұрын
Great video!:)
@ihaveaboyfriendmeh1026
Жыл бұрын
Wonderful exposition. Quick question. What are the favorable weight of the critical mass in terms of density and weight in kilograms?
@Sokol10
Жыл бұрын
Latter the explosive lens was simplified in a tubular explosive charge, using a solid oblate spheroid Plutonium pit, and thus achieving the same symmetric compression, but this arrange allow make smaller - in size; bombs, and so put 10 thermonuclear warheads in one ICBM.
@MINIbrickz14
Жыл бұрын
im year 9 and doing this sometimes i question myself
@qinglinchen6487
3 жыл бұрын
on the left you see little boy, on the right you see fat boy. luv that quote
@ameeraaisya5689
3 жыл бұрын
fat man
@markotrieste
Жыл бұрын
Fat man
@hemillyoliveira7426
2 жыл бұрын
Fantástico 👏👏👏
@hanjoyitsu1414
2 жыл бұрын
i totally wouldnt be here if it wasnt for my curiosity of whats happening right now...
@richardhenry5822
Жыл бұрын
Iron ore? Gaseous diffusion? Po-Be Neutron initiators?
@georgelaboogar3106
3 жыл бұрын
You can build uranium implosion bombs. You cannot build plutonium gun type bombs.
@nickelbrille1
Жыл бұрын
Ok, but where does the first neutron come from that starts the chain reaction. Is there something like spontaneous nuclear fission in uranium/plutonium that releases neutrons ?
@markotrieste
Жыл бұрын
Google up "urchin".
@AMC2283
Жыл бұрын
The radioactive material contains neutrons. They’re always colliding in the nucleus. It’s compressed so that it’s a chain reaction instead of normal decay.
@markotrieste
Жыл бұрын
@@AMC2283 sorry but no. Again, google for "urchin".
@zwigoma2
Жыл бұрын
So it's gravity that separates the 235 from 238 ?
@RealChemistryVideos
Жыл бұрын
Not gravity, but mass.
@randomuser1010
11 ай бұрын
Number of neutrons. Aka, atomic mass (different isotopes)
@drrocketman7794
Жыл бұрын
For the Little Boy bomb, they used a literal 170mm smoothbore gun barrel to make the bomb.
@drrocketman7794
Жыл бұрын
@erickanter4090 yes, it was.
@supraa66
Жыл бұрын
How do they manage to achieve a perfectly symmetrical explosion?
@thomasw.eggers4303
Жыл бұрын
A symmetrical explosion was an extremely difficult question at Los Alamos. The basic problem is similar to squeezing an orange with your hand: juice squirts out in lots of places because the inward-moving compression is not symmetrical. The solution was to use two different explosive types, with different rates of burning. They are carefully shaped to create the "perfectly symmetrical explosion". (The details need a diagram which you can find elsewhere on KZitem". ) The difficulty resulted in testing the plutonium bomb at Alamogordo in July 1945, with the shaped charges, before dropping one on Nagasaki. The uranium bomb shot a uranium "bullet" into a uranium target. That was a much simpler design, and the Hiroshima bomb was of that type and was not tested before being used on Hiroshima.
@brian8838
Жыл бұрын
Seth Rogan's voice + Science = Success
@suneelyadav6614
2 жыл бұрын
Where is red mercury used then
@EdMcF1
Жыл бұрын
I'm taking notes for a friend who is a Tin-Pot Dictator.
@smiteforge9113
2 жыл бұрын
That's what I forgot. Thanks! (All jokes of course)
@benquinney2
3 жыл бұрын
Sort it out
@gamelover2594
2 жыл бұрын
how some reactor like CANDU use U238 ?
@RealChemistryVideos
2 жыл бұрын
Good question! The CANDU reactor uses unrefined uranium which still contains some U-235. It is this U-235 which is still central to its production of energy.
@firestar7188
2 жыл бұрын
@@RealChemistryVideos The trick to make CANDU reactors work , and they use natural Uranium ( 0,7 U 235 and 99,3 U 238 ) is That U can not use normal Light water ( H2O ) . H2O is a neutron absorber, To get a controlled reaction The CANDU reactors needs expensive Heavy water ( D2O )
Пікірлер: 54