Another big problem is that every time Nike releases a retro shoe, the quality of the shoe is completely different from the original. The build of the original is 90% better quality than the re-releases.
@godgivespizza238
29 күн бұрын
Now their caption is 'Winning Isn't For Everyone. It's for those who do whatever it takes.'
@thecookingshorts
16 күн бұрын
nike panda dunks quality is pretty bad LOL
@Dangic23
16 күн бұрын
@@thecookingshorts The originals from the 1980s were actual leather and hand stitched . The ones people buy now are plastic and glued. 😂
@nguyen_van_a
Ай бұрын
Basically, any big shoe brand: "Please buy our $250 shoes so that $50 goes to Ronaldo and Messi, and 50 cents goes to the workers". I feel ashamed buying from them.
@MultiSciGeek
Ай бұрын
Exactly! Not just that, but the quality just feels so cheap, I feel ashamed wearing them… ok not really but it’s uncomfortable and I hate buying new shoes every 3 months ffs
@SiNNEi2
Ай бұрын
Thats how branding works. Just like apple, u pay a bigger margin for nike and the likes for the brand of belonging to a community of like minded people aka the superstars and all.
@hlz191
Ай бұрын
That’s why I don’t buy from them
@boxoffisa
Ай бұрын
@@SiNNEi2they don’t know how this works.
@kaischmidt730
Ай бұрын
yes! if buying high priced items, the money should go to the workers and producing sustainably.
@ropro9817
Ай бұрын
From a customer's perspective, the problem is that their product quality is in the toilet now. I used to love Nike running shoes and happily shelled out over $100 for a pair but these days, they barely last me a year before falling apart. 😒 Much like Boeing, feels like the bean counters are running the ship.
@jz4461
Ай бұрын
Running shoes shouldn't last a year if you run with any regularity, and you should have a couple pairs to rotate to extend their useful life. They should normally last for 300-500 miles
@ropro9817
Ай бұрын
@@jz4461 True, but I don't run! I just use Nike Pegasus as everyday walking shoes and I don't even walk much daily.
@imamfakhruddin1015
Ай бұрын
@@jz4461 or maybe that's what they convince you to think so you don't mind buying their shoes two, three times a year
@mtldragon9860
Ай бұрын
Due to past injuries and tracking shoe life and injury trends, I ended up rotating running shoes every 200 to 250 miles. Foams degrade over time. However, I do admit I put in 1100miles on an Adidas Adios Pro and kept enjoying them, so maybe there is truth to the durability question. For better or worse, subsequent models didn't last as long due to the upper breaking, which stopped me from tempting fate.
@jz4461
Ай бұрын
@@mtldragon9860 Yup, the foam absorbs a massive amount of force (3x bodyweight) with each stride. When that happens, the shoe feels "flat" and no longer provides the support that it needs to. For me, this happens before I'm wearing through the upper. I ran competitively in HS and college, and folks hold on to their running shoes for way too long. You increase injury risk substantially by running in shoes beyond when you should, and I wish average runners were more informed.
@phillipwong3754
Ай бұрын
What the upper management didn't know, their customers need to try on the shoes. They were blinded by sneakerheads where a lot of the time, the shoes aren't being worn.
@nikilragav
Ай бұрын
exactly. Collector behavior is very different than general wearers
@GoGogleUser
Ай бұрын
Sneakerheads know the fit and comfort of sneakers and are confident in the online purchases.
@phillipwong3754
Ай бұрын
@@GoGogleUser that too..
@vashonm
Ай бұрын
They got too greedy with cutting 3rd party sellers
@mohamedchebab9917
Ай бұрын
they got too greedy with cutting shoes quality
@thekongstocks
Ай бұрын
BINGO! Pulling them from past-season department stores like Marshalls & TJX hurt 'em
@sidybidy
Ай бұрын
When Jordans are sitting on shelves, you know Nike is in trouble.
@tomh2121
Ай бұрын
Jordans is only part of the story. In Europe, Air Max has always been the trendiest shoe lines, but again I see more and more people wearing other brands (Hoka, On Cloud, Salomon, Adidas Samba). I also think trainers (sneakers) are generally a bit less popular than they were and more people are moving towards shoes and boots.
@Ahmed-gg4oz
Ай бұрын
@@tomh2121 Bro prices of trainers are expensive and many people in Europe who are typically the buyers aren't making enough money to afford them.
@heraldomedrano851
29 күн бұрын
Jordans are overrated.
@sweeseen9577
Ай бұрын
Nike is becoming the Boeing in shoe industry. Cutting cost, quality dropping and yet price up the product. Bye, going for Adidas.
@vincentchin88
Ай бұрын
I went back to New Balance.
@julioduan7130
Ай бұрын
The quality of adidas is worse than Nike.
@DiegoTeliz
27 күн бұрын
...and putting a CEO that has 0 knowledge of the end product and focuses only on the stock price.
@kantalarski
26 күн бұрын
Adidas is not cheaper and Hoka or ASICS are more expensive.
@nulnoh219
26 күн бұрын
Worst. Chinese customers are going to their own domestic brands. Made by the same factories anyway.
@zagallo79
Ай бұрын
That CEO is terrible
@mohamedchebab9917
Ай бұрын
why
@roryburkhart6784
Ай бұрын
Because he laid off tons of workers and gave himself a multimillion dollar raise in roughly the same year
@paulg9484
Ай бұрын
Agreed. Shoes are meant to be worn and tried before buying
@DerekLaugann
Ай бұрын
and WOKE!
@CJBroonie
10 күн бұрын
And made a huge mistake cutting out brick and mortar stores because he only knows eBay, and has such a big ego he refused to admit he doesn’t know the show market and just declared a “transition” like he had nothing to do with profit losses. He should have been fired.
@iam_nick
Ай бұрын
The quality is the issue
@Ilovecruise
Ай бұрын
Nike’s product quality has gone down quite a lot since they moved out of china, the quality right now are more like 5 dollars product instead of something that are selling for 100-200 dollars. It’s simply overpriced and bad quality
@DrRussell
26 күн бұрын
Where have they moved to, please?
@mattkop5755
Ай бұрын
problem is if you do outdoors activities they break in a month
@mra.prasetio
Ай бұрын
Real
@limbeboy7
Ай бұрын
So like what shoes were made for?!
@bltzcstrnx
Ай бұрын
Don't all professional sports gear work like that? They're made for peak performance, not reliability. Take a look at sports cars, their components break so often. F1 tires are basically single time use and don't even last the entire race.
@bltzcstrnx
Ай бұрын
@@limbeboy7sports equipment is made for peak performance, not reliability. Many components in sport, including motor racing, are single use. Scrapped after the season ends or, in case of tires, doesn't even last the entire race.
@hypothalapotamus5293
19 күн бұрын
@@bltzcstrnx A $300 shoe like the Alpha fly (or adidas Evo3 or on cloud strife) that will barely last 8 marathons makes sense if you are a pro, but so much of training is mileage spam. I'd save a lot of money if my everyday running shoes had an outsole that was a millimeter thicker than it is.
@goldwinger5434
Ай бұрын
From about 77 to 2007, I wore nothing but Nike. Now I wear Merrill and New Balance. They went too political.
@SP-ki5gn
29 күн бұрын
Well you do need left and right...
@gearoiddom
21 күн бұрын
I never got what that woke approach was supposed to do commercially. Just seems like a deliberate customer base alienation strategy. Any board that signed off on such strategy ought to fall on their own sword.
@racealot
Ай бұрын
I dont know if it is a big issue for Nike. But I live in Sweden and here adidas, asics and HOKA is on every peoples feet. And when Im in the store and talk to people in general about Nike they all say the same thing " Nike is to narrow and there is no room in the toebox". I guess they loosing a lot of customers just for that simple reason. Im one of them
@windsong3wong828
Ай бұрын
Totally agree.
@pahlevymu
14 күн бұрын
Agreed, i thought it was just my feet are too wide until i talked to my sibling and friends that experienced the same. Air Max is too tight and not that comfortable for its price. So more people changed to New Balance or Asics who offer better comfort.
@DonGivani
13 күн бұрын
All BS, you should check data
@windsong3wong828
13 күн бұрын
@@DonGivani Nike shoes are narrow. I only use them for casual walking. I use ASICS shoes for long walks or travel walks.
@CJBroonie
10 күн бұрын
Same here. Too narrow.
@overman2306
Ай бұрын
A lot of companies are living off their name, but they're completely different companies to what they once were. I prefer to find smaller companies that offer great quality at a fair price. I'll even pay more for better quality, but I won't pay more just for a brand.
@velocidad-media
Ай бұрын
"Nike RAN into trouble "..... I saw what you did there
@MatomeModiba-pe4dq
Ай бұрын
Now I cannot unsee it
@boxoffisa
Ай бұрын
I couldn’t see it until you pointed at it. That’s perfect. Lol.
@velocidad-media
Ай бұрын
@@MatomeModiba-pe4dq 🤣🤣🤣
@velocidad-media
Ай бұрын
@@boxoffisa at first i was like ...aham the title..but then i went "AHAAAAMM THE TITLEEE !!! "
@gablan1468
Ай бұрын
I bought myself Nike running shoes for around 80$, at the same time I bought running shoes from Decathlon for 10$. They looked alike - both in style and color. Difference was only in price. Needless to say, the Decathlon ones lasted much longer.
@jer103
Ай бұрын
Where did you buy the Decathlon for 10$?
@gablan1468
Ай бұрын
@jer103 They sell them in Bulgaria for 10€. Idk how much they will cost where you live, but it has to be somewhere around that price. It is the gray Ekiden one model.
@johnta17
Ай бұрын
Buying shoes is a tactile experience. You have to go try them on. Nike trying to go digital and cut out middle man was a huge mistake.
@Your_President_Kanye_East
Ай бұрын
Nike's quality sucks. I had gym clothes and shoes from Adidas and New Balance, which I used for 5 years or so before I had to throw them away. Nike's product start falling apart literally after weeks. I don't know how they're still on the market considering the abysmal quality.
@HiddenWen
Ай бұрын
I have a pair of Asics running shoes that I bought in 2010. I'm still using them, and they are still perfectly fine.
@user-tt6il2up4o
29 күн бұрын
SAME HERE, I only use ASICS RUNNING SHOES. Nike I consider a fashion brand.
@sylvias2062
Ай бұрын
Abuse in the industry is a topic the internet community should research .
@mylesmacleod4306
Ай бұрын
Everyone's feet are different. You can't tell how well a shoe fits your foot from an online picture. So a lot of people will always want to buy shoes in person. Amazed that a shoe company didn't know this!
@jerryrichardson2799
Ай бұрын
Hoka, Salomon, Sketchers, Columbia, Adidas, Brooks, Merrell, Clark's, and Puma.
@deezynar
29 күн бұрын
I have refused to buy their products for over 30 years. The world would be better off if they went out of business.
@manfestiondaily
Ай бұрын
Boring same shoes, quality declined massively
@MrBobbyBrown2006
18 күн бұрын
Prices are up, quality is down. During a recession and weak economy, people are putting their money towards other things. Simple as that.
@rockets4kids
Ай бұрын
I just took a look at the 20 year stock history and it paints a completely different picture. It is much fairer to say the company was over-valued in 2020 - 2022.
@petergianakopoulos4926
14 күн бұрын
Exactly... someone is thinking.
@nikhilsahay895
Ай бұрын
It was such a joke to let in shelf space to Hoka and ON without much effort. Sure you want to focus on Online sales, but you can not just let your competition easy rides.
@mushieslushie
Ай бұрын
Yeah, willingly giving up that shelf space was a huge mistake. Online sales obviously increased during the pandemic, but they are still shoes and people want to try them on first. It only made sense that retail would come back.
@havencat9337
Ай бұрын
people now tried ON and surely they would not go back to Nike
@nikhilsahay895
Ай бұрын
@@havencat9337 well, I am not a big fan of ON even after trying. They are one trick pony. Nike has multiple varieties for various uses.
@TheAvillamizarq
Ай бұрын
Way to expensive.. the need to lower prices in a significant amount of
@limbeboy7
Ай бұрын
$35
@IshaanCH24
Ай бұрын
I don't know what surprised me more: 1. That Nike relied so heavily on retailers for it's revenue. 2. That people would so easily switch to other brands, with the implication that price >>> loyalty + quality 3. On and Asics are paying retailers better for selling their wares. They get a higher commission 4. The share price fell because of weak profit guidance. Which is still okay. Marketing + Innovation + Partnerships
@london9901
Ай бұрын
So, what does the future hold for Nike? Will it bounce back?
@katariagaurav
Ай бұрын
Yawn, Nike is boring! They sold you a product for far more than what a shoe should cost, to be able to pay sportstar fees to market their products! They have fooled generations.
@afvet5075
Ай бұрын
Way, way too expensive. And greed has caught up to them.
@michalsutto311
Ай бұрын
Not sure about the retail argument - it seems Nike stopped innovating some time ago. They just don’t make cool, high quality stuff anymore. That’s the problem.
@kelsey_roy
Ай бұрын
I’m into Hoka now. They have more styles on offer.
@cfstonge
Ай бұрын
Best running shoes I’ve ever owned
@kazuma712
Ай бұрын
For casual wear and performance I think they are leading, but I don’t they are “cool” or fashionable at the moment. We will see how the people respond in the future
@huzcer
Ай бұрын
For context Nike is still more than double the size of Adidas in terms of revenue and more again on income
@Mixam-256
Ай бұрын
True, does this translate to dividends to investors?
@huzcer
Ай бұрын
@@Mixam-256 Nike's dividend yield is a 6 X that of Adidas
@TheBooban
Ай бұрын
Doesn’t matter. It’s more than Adidas. They lost #1 in China , soon just #3, and all the competitors are biting Nike like piranhas.
@BillyP13
Ай бұрын
In terms of innovation, zero!
@huzcer
Ай бұрын
@@BillyP13 Nike created carbon plated shoes - since then all the others have done is copy them....
@Novilicious
Ай бұрын
Their toolboxes are just too narrow, and I personally like wider tow boxes, which some companies like ASICS and ON have
@jer103
Ай бұрын
*toe boxes
@johnblaze8774
Ай бұрын
I went to Sports Direct and saw plenty of well designed Puma, Adidas and other shoes for £50 and less. Every Nike shoes was at least £120. Some were £174!
@Forbes123
22 күн бұрын
I have not bought nike ever since they got caught using a 12-year-old pakastani boy sewing nike shoes for only 60 cents a day. An Nike denied these claims until they were proven to be true. A bunch of liars. Plus they sell $5 shoes for $150. Quality of shoes keeps going down. Nike (the company) won't be recognizable in another 10 years. The decline can't be reversed. They're done.
@manueljosephcalma
Ай бұрын
I thought this is about the message their Olympic Ad delivers. "Winning isn't for everyone..."
@thejeffinvade
Ай бұрын
I prefer Alphafly 3 over Asics metaspeed sky paris or Hoka Rocket X2. The problem isn't NIke's products, it is its marketing. ON, Hoka have hosted several running shoe promotion events for my local running club, 5-6 times a year. So far since the pandemic, nike showed up only twice to promote their new shoes for us to try on.
@avocadogaming3942
Ай бұрын
Ultraboost are just so much better than anything Nike has.
@bluesque9687
Ай бұрын
Nike CEO changed. Fortunes changed! Even their alphafly is no alpha in the running market! The running market!! The CEO must resign. JD must resign.
@duskrider1724
Ай бұрын
Nike’s are too narrow
@ignaciofuentes2642
Ай бұрын
Yep....hundreds of shoes on their site and only like 10 come in wide sizes.
@ImpulseMuffin
Ай бұрын
I ran in Nike’s for years but now I have Brooks Ghost’s that I love
@noodlessurprise
Ай бұрын
Nike like adidas have got greedy. The prices are ridiculous.
@Viewmp
Ай бұрын
So you are basically saying nike is falling because the stock price is going down, but you are not looking at sales numbers or revenues ?
@wnose
Ай бұрын
No. Nike fell because they reduced their reliance on retail channels and their styling fell out of favor with consumers.
@Viewmp
14 күн бұрын
@@wnose how Nike fell if their revenue each year is higher than the year before since pandemic ? And their profit of the last 4 years is better than the pre-pandemic ?
@MadMadOne
Ай бұрын
Quality, comfort and sizing is extremely inconsistent. If i buy a pair of Nikes, its for the looks. I have Asics Kinsei Blast for comfort and treadmill.
@dharmapunk777
Ай бұрын
buying shoes and clothing online is a dice roll. its convenient if they fit, but not all do.
@anandpaulraj8094
Ай бұрын
Nike is more interested in making the Street analysts happy!!! Forgot about their customer!!!😂😂😂
@Loki-ew6gg
Ай бұрын
Hoka is better than Nike in terms of Quality and are affordable.
@seantan4702
Ай бұрын
A shoe company don’t understand shoes need to try before buy.
@Astr0b0y8
Ай бұрын
Nike will make a comeback for sure. But other smaller brands have definitely taken a bite out of their dominance
@An-Orange-Fox
Ай бұрын
I like the Getty images video 2:12
@kashmirha
21 күн бұрын
I am suprised they are not firing the management for letting the shelves for their competitors. Huuuuge mistake.
@yakxattack
27 күн бұрын
My Asics Gel Lyte Vs are the comfiest shoes I’ve ever worn and they’re so stylish. I don’t think Nike can win me back anytime soon.
@thuydoan7496
28 күн бұрын
Another important reason why Nike is failing is because basketball is no longer the sought after sports to follow, instead it is soccer now, which Addidas holds most of the market share.
@plasmichoneytrip
Ай бұрын
Nike looks like it’s stuck in the 2010s. Adidas dominated the market the last few years with Sambas alone. For workout shoes, people have chosen as stated in this video. Personally, Nike is overpriced with seemingly low quality shoes. They look cheap now than they did in the 90s.
@QuantumQuasar91
Ай бұрын
There are so much better shoes than Nike, especially for walking/running such as Hoka, Brooks, etc…
@melonyogloo
Ай бұрын
They only releasing retro models. It is boring.
@winter5490
Ай бұрын
Retro is so so so boring😴
@QuintonDolan
Ай бұрын
I have owned plenty of Nike sports wear but hate the fit of their shoes as they never seem to fit or move as well as some other brands.
@jrbruce7750
Ай бұрын
What Nike is doing to hold on the market share is they keep sending out the old Jordan’s which is keeping the brand relevant.
@evanortiz6471
30 минут бұрын
It’s their quality. No one is gonna buy a 100+ dollar shoe that is gonna break on you in three months. They have cut so many corners, that they have burned their fans, and now they are going to look elsewhere.
@WookieChewie13
Ай бұрын
Ceo didnt respect the consumers and the product, too money focused. I buy w lot of hoop shoes and Nike quality is not the same
@natilyfe
28 күн бұрын
They were expecting sports fans to pay high end fashion prices for athletic apparel
@Mister.Unknown
Ай бұрын
Nike has suffered the Zarafication of an entire industry. Why sell a $50 shoe for $100 when people are buying $3 skirts for $35? Just markup your products x10 and ride the idiocracy wave...
@Mustradamus
Ай бұрын
Nike's, greedy, my skateboard sneakers used to cost me $30. Today, those same ones cost $80, so I just switched over to Adidas. LOL.
@kohort1
Ай бұрын
Adidas quality seemed to be shortcuted much more than Nike
@Nico_r08
14 күн бұрын
The mayor problem with Nike is that their sneakers are freaking expensive but they're not that valuable and people are realising that, adidas and other brands have shoes for almost every pocket
@bishopoftroy
Ай бұрын
The customer is always supporting the unwanted side effects when a major competitor is struggling. Always prefer competition. I hope Nike gets back up soon. BTW: i never understood Jordans, they don`t look cool (at least in my book) at best "classic" and they are everything but comfortable. Rigid plastic.
@tride.design
Ай бұрын
I bought a pair 2 years ago by mistake 😅
@morisjohnny84
17 күн бұрын
My last pair of Nike was back in 2016..Nike Tiempo legend..
@Rishabh_Sharma
Ай бұрын
They have to run in trouble, look at their prices in india. It’s find to pay till 10k, now they have like taken it to 15 or more. Come one, it’s a shoe, our country is already making replicas and you still thinking a large group of people will buy your stuff.
@Rodrics23
Ай бұрын
Feels like Addidas paid them, its the same for both. Isn't Addidas more expensive and the same narrative?
@Legion849
12 күн бұрын
Adidas is generally better than Nike. Nike shoes are too narrow, and size options are limited . The quality is not great for long-term use. I got more mileage out of my cheap shoes they are better quality and, most importantly, comfortable, something Nike is severly lacking. Nike is the new Boeing
@buddhavb3616
28 күн бұрын
I've worked in the athletic footwear industry for over 30 years and I could not agree more!
@jw999
Ай бұрын
Not complicated... Just go back to what they did before. Work with the retailers and innovate.
@TLHHE
15 күн бұрын
RESELLER HURT NIKE!!! I WILL NEVER GO FOR THIS STORE LINKING WITH RESELLER GETTING ALL THEY CAN GET OUTTA THE HOTTEST RELEASES & NOW ITS OUT OF HAND!!!
@andresmc210
26 күн бұрын
In my country, Argentina, Nike running shoes cost twice as much as similar models from Saucony and Puma.
@tris3s10
Ай бұрын
I tried working out in Nikes. And my shins and ankles were in extreme pain. When I shifted to hokas, asics or brooks, it made a substantial difference in performance. Nike are more of esthetics in my opinion. It’s a life style shoe.
@Lonelyplanet3
Ай бұрын
They failed to return my money. No trace nothing.
@omnip3469
Ай бұрын
They got greedy. They wanted too much profit with cheap products and their prices are going to a luxury level
@Footballfanatic991
Ай бұрын
Literally. Me and my friends literally say the same. Why buy them when you could save and buy a higher end product. Also if you want something more comfortable at that price point, just go adidas or these other brands.
@chris-nj3vg
21 күн бұрын
Even if I wanted to buy Nike running shoes, I can't. They are just never present in the sport shops here in Switzerland.
@rubenlopezusa
20 күн бұрын
I have always been a Nike customer. I bought a pair of shoes that I only use at the gym one year ago, and they already have holes, both of them at the same time. Quality problem.
@jaapspruitenburg6625
Ай бұрын
Nike always stood for innovation, but with cutting on the design and development department of your company you won't innovate... Let it be a shot for the bow of other companies as well.
@momurda6
26 күн бұрын
My last Nikes was 2017. Didnt last a year until the solo started to un-glue. Never again.
@NOTMARCOSTE
13 күн бұрын
Nike should restart from 3 pillars: story telling, cause it just feels great running with Nike shoes because of the narration built upon the brand - credibility, because it used to be that when Nike put out a commercial, the words just didn't ring hollow - and third, sustainability, cause Nike is the company of innovation, effort, limit-breaking and future-making, and there are none of those without sustainability.
@Starlesslight
22 күн бұрын
Never personally found them to be comfortable when tryjng them on. I've never owned a pair in my life because of that.
@erock736
Ай бұрын
Presence is everything for marketing. When people go shopping and they never see Nike anymore it leaves the mind for what’s new on the shelves.
@ewed418
Ай бұрын
Finally a company that understand digital transformation which worked all too well.
@bloodspartan300
Ай бұрын
This is bull... nike was over inflated during the pandemic, that is all.... if you look at nikes cap compared to its competitors is still astronomical... nike isnt struggling... nikes biggest struggle is the media talking about its struggle
@hintex487
Ай бұрын
Nike’s value has dropped by $100 billion since the last Summer Olympics, largely due to its shift away from brick-and-mortar retailers and increased competition from brands like ON, Asics, and Hoka.
@kota3233
Ай бұрын
One thing not brought up is the transition into hype brand. The few Nikes I still see in store have some crazy styling few people I know would want to wear.
@thecookingshorts
16 күн бұрын
used to wear nike for the style but now adidas for comfort. ultraboost for life
@lempickavb3476
Ай бұрын
While lurking on youtube I was just telling myself I don't like the messages Nike is pushing through their ads these days. Glorifying selfishness & cruelty through them while much more positive messages can be drawn from sport. So even just for that reason I'm disappointed in them.
@kevinkaremera
Ай бұрын
The thumbnail is 🔥🔥
@silvermanq9454
Ай бұрын
I worked hard for a $250 Nike shoes and I walked around the corner, homeless and jobless Brothers wearing the same shoes as me. 😢
@mikesedam616
24 күн бұрын
The Kapernick issue soured me on Nike now I will not but their product.
@user-en2fl9fs9j
Ай бұрын
I switched to sandals and both cheaper brands off Amazon that fit my style. It wasn’t about names but comfort
@anthonywardjr1750
Ай бұрын
I only get shoes from thrifting now. Just got 350 dollars worth of shoes for the price of two movie tickets on a weekday
@holdenmcgroin8699
Ай бұрын
Management issue: did not take seriously the newer competition thinking loyal customers wouldnt try other brands that we can actually try while own products not lasting as long thinking we would buy more… goodluck
@fretstain
Ай бұрын
I love that after leaving Nike, Federer's investment/partnership with ON started eating their lunch
Пікірлер: 461