Wow, such a great interview. A rare voice of reason. Not fawning, not chest beating, not calling names. Focussed on best way forward for both sides (world).
This is not the "voice of reason". The CCP couldn't have said it better themselves, that is lull Americans into a dreamy kumbaya view of China while it is working full time on their stated intention of total war using every available means, in this case, an obvious distortion of reality to effect an eventual defeat of America. Doubt what I'm saying? Educate yourself. You'll find out.
@Darhan62
Жыл бұрын
More people should look at the videos that show a walk along the Bund, with all the tourists and Chinese citizens there enjoying the view. These are people like we are, regardless of their authoritarian government, and we need to find a way to coexist peacefully with them. Some problems (e.g. human rights issues, espionage, etc.) may require many decades to be worked out, but in the meantime, there's a logic in reining in our own hawkish domestic political rhetoric in the interests of avoiding pushing China into a dangerous place.
@Guy-Lewis
Жыл бұрын
The problem is not with the people strolling along the Bund, it's with governments controlled by powermongers. I understand the merits of dialogue, but, If the people are to be helped, their governments must realize that invading other nations will not work for the greater good. Authoritarians only respect strength.
@pedrocem3018
Жыл бұрын
Only just talk about ideology and forget the priorities of our country intrest will lead to the unnecessary conflict which ultimately push China to Putin's side . kind of silly that two parties China policy is to blame each other too soft to Chinese communist. Instead like this professor ideas to strengthen our country to set up real examples to the world that our government values and principles are prevailing for countries to benefit which what our beautiful country is that is what strong means not just not just dogmatically emphasizing ideology.
@richardlin6695
Жыл бұрын
You need to consider the rights of twenty three million Taiwanese people who are being threatened by China all the time. Taiwan doesn’t belong to the Chinese communist party. And have the right to govern themselves
@Darhan62
Жыл бұрын
@@richardlin6695, as I said, some problems may require decades to be worked out. The danger I see is escalating anti-China rhetoric by US politicians on both the left and the right, each side trying to "out-hawk" the other for fear of being labeled soft on China. What we need is discipline, objectivity, and care. Some things are best done quietly. The US-China relationship needs to be managed, in hopes of creating the circumstances that will allow China to become more responsible, more democratic, and less threatening in its behavior. If we in the US can control our behavior, perhaps China will learn to control its behavior as well.
@richardlin6695
Жыл бұрын
I think the international community will eventually recognize that Taiwan is an independent state,have the right to govern itself, and will eventually join the United Nations. We have never ever belonged to the Chinese communist party just like Ukrainian people don’t belong to Russia!!
@ZA-ev5mf
Жыл бұрын
Can Americans buy land in China.
@iandavies4853
Жыл бұрын
Tesla did, not insignificant. Special economic / export zone. Meanwhile CATL struggling to get into US.
@stanleyhuynh1659
Жыл бұрын
Tesla able to do that, wow! Can I buy a vacation home in China?
@Guy-Lewis
Жыл бұрын
""An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last."" ~ Winston Churchill (adapted from a speech on January 20, 1940)
@kevinjenner9502
Жыл бұрын
Churchill was an important voice in Eisenhower’s CIA Coup in Iran. (CIA Operation Ajax 1953)
@Guy-Lewis
Жыл бұрын
@@kevinjenner9502 Churchill was an important voice in DISTRUSTING the Soviets.
@Guy-Lewis
Жыл бұрын
Nota Bene, logic-challenged trolls. Ad hominem fallacies targeting Churchill do NOT alter the truth encapsuled in this quotation.
@har8397
Жыл бұрын
Well said
@Guy-Lewis
Жыл бұрын
@@har8397 Winston will be pleased.
@richardlin6695
Жыл бұрын
The Taiwanese people are not pawns to be pushed around by other countries. We are independent just like the Ukrainian people are!!
@galanis38
Жыл бұрын
Are you really independent? How exactly do you compare yourselves to the Ukrainians? The Ukrainians are divided among themselves...
@Waiting664
Жыл бұрын
Ask un to recognise u
@MrYoshigu
Жыл бұрын
Keep thinking that way, and Ukraine’s fate will be Taiwans too
@Handleit2024
Жыл бұрын
I did not hear one question or response from the guest aimed at what China may do to reduce the current geopolitical tension. A great deal of discussion - much of it valid - centred on what ‘we’ should be doing differently…. The inference I came away with is we are the genesis of the tension, the sustainers of the tension and ultimately the only party responsible for reducing the tension. The quest assertion that we would be better off demonstrating and supporting and strengthening democracies is - mmm sounds like our positions re Taiwan…..
@jmbickham
Жыл бұрын
Well put! That is largely what I was getting at in my comments… that in the questions aimed at the guest professor and also her responses, there was no mention at all of what China may do to reduce the tension between the two nations. With all of the focus on what the US is doing wrong and should be doing instead, that leads viewers to think that the US is primary cause of the tension and is thus responsible for reducing the tension. Not mentioning the issues of territorial sovereignty, North Korea, the 180 in Filipino foreign policy and Japan’s military budget increase to over 1% in 2020 for the first time since 1960 and now budget to increase to 2% by 2027 heavily undercuts her argument as well.
@cpxh7703
Жыл бұрын
Only the US sends air craft carriers and war ships to China. Only the US sanctions China. Only the US wants to make Taiwan as an independent country. China wants to do business with the US but got high tarrifs instead.
@tragicrhythm
Жыл бұрын
The most level-headed, common sense, objective take I’ve heard so far. I think the guest hit the nail on the head in saying people in the US are afraid of being perceived as anything but anti-China, and that sentiment prevents them from thinking about the topic further in a thoughtful sensible manner. Hopefully the Biden administration is not doing that and if so, will course-correct and not head down a trump-like path of inflammatory rhetoric and no practical policies.
@kevinjenner9502
Жыл бұрын
The “Yellow Peril” rhetoric has a long history.
@guitarista666
Жыл бұрын
@@kevinjenner9502 The idiot, naive one is even longer. If you believe this kind of crap, which it demonstrably is, make an effort to educate yourself.
@PhilipWong55
Жыл бұрын
The United States is the wealthiest country in the world and have the most powerful military for the last seventy-eight years. This led some Americans to believe that they are exceptional and that there are natural laws that ensure their position as the number one nation on earth forever. As such, the US feels justified to use all necessary means to maintain its dominance and will take any steps necessary to prevent any potential rivals from growing too strong. CIA was involved in covert operations that resulted in mass killings of communists in over 22 countries. More than 500,000 innocent Indonesian civilians disappeared in 1965-1966. To make the world safe for democracy, the US has caused the deaths of over 12 million people in its conflicts in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. China believes that a multipolar world is essential for global development, where every country has the opportunity to realize its full economic potential. This approach emphasizes cooperation between nations rather than competition, to achieve a shared vision of prosperity for all. While the US prioritizes its position as the sole superpower, China advocates for a more inclusive and cooperative approach that allows for the development of all nations. In the last forty-four years, the Chinese military has not used its weapons to kill a single person outside its territory. China will not be lured into war.
@jmbickham
Жыл бұрын
No mention of the South China Sea. No mention of the Senkaku/Daioyu Islands. No mention of government and corporate espionage. No mention of issues around IP. No mention of transition in the world auto market to EVs, microchip manufacturing and rebalancing the US industrial capabilities. Both this interview and Jessica Chen Weiss’ responses that failed to address any of these points while cherry picking those where the US could be considered as being unnecessarily aggressive is very disingenuous and does the viewers who are not knowledgeable or experts on East Asian politics and international affairs a real disservice. Jon Stewart also did something similar recently as well… is this some “thing” with the American media now? So we’re at propaganda now?
@har8397
Жыл бұрын
This comment is underrated
@tommos1
Жыл бұрын
Are you talking about the US? Yes I agree. They do all these things and no one bats an eye.
@nmew6926
Жыл бұрын
Why should US surround China with 500 military bases in the first place. The issue of sovereignty of South China Sea islands are irrelevant. China need these islands to build bases so that they may scatter their naval, assets. If US decide to close all their bases, then it is appropriate for China to do same on the few islands
@jmbickham
Жыл бұрын
@@nmew6926 Number of US military bases… which by and large long time preexisted the current tensions with China by many decades (yes, I am aware of the expansion in the Philippines)? Issue of sovereignty of the South China Sea, Spratly Islands and Senkaku/Daioyu Islands is irrelevant? China *needs* these islands for their military projection? Is that all you have? Military bases whose building had more to do with WWII, the Korean War and the Soviet Union and sovereignty being irrelevant in the face Chinese military needs? *sign*. You can China-hawk all you like, but you’ve got no real argument here. Whataboutism isn’t a real defense. Sovereignty is at the root of nearly all major human conflicts since time immemorial. It may not always be directly related to the event that starts the conflict, but that event was merely a pretense to a dispute hat had been building for some time. More than 30 years ago the US had closed its large bases in the Philippines (the bases came out of history long predating Mao and Lenin). Japan had directly and purposefully limited it’s military budget to 1% of GDP as a policy started by then Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida since 1960. Why the sudden changes? Why has the Philippines suddenly invited the US military back in (after having a very China friendly foreign policy)? Why has Japan suddenly moved to increase it’s military budget to 2% of GDP by 2027? I’ll give you a hint… “US pressure” or “US threats” are wrong (and lazy) answers. Maybe… just maybe China’s aggressive behavior in the Pacific, lack of leadership with North Korea and the destabilizing threat North Korea’s missile and nuclear programs poses to its neighbors has something to do with it? Nah… it’s that evil imperialistic United States! They are the root of all evil! (/sarcasm) Here’s another one for you. So if the US withdrew most of its military from the Pacific, China would suddenly pack up and go home? All would be better and there’ll be peace… right? If you believe that… I have a bridge to sell you.
@ptownzfinest12345
Жыл бұрын
🫳"🎤 "
@varivavariva6045
Жыл бұрын
Kudos to Professor Chen Weiss for speaking out against US' irrational warmongering and dangerously provocative foreign policies.
@walterchin8832
Жыл бұрын
This was an excellent interview of Ms Jessica Chen White on China/US relationship. She ought be appointed to work for US government in the State Department to work for peace and prosperity for both nation.
@linhai69
Жыл бұрын
China should support Russia the exact same way US/EU support Taiwan jet for jet, missile for missile, tank for tank, and China's got enough to go around.
@timothyrockwell2638
Жыл бұрын
Yep, China only escalates, because the US escalates. China's military doctrine, and its nuclear deterrence doctrine are based on "Minimum Deterrence Theory". Unlike the US, China does not have a first strike policy.
@stanleyhuynh1659
Жыл бұрын
Dr Chen Weiss, is speaking with cool analysis with fair for both side. Reasonable way for China and the West mainly United States. Keep the peace, please!
@JuliaMRichter
Жыл бұрын
You want to go against freedom of speech in the USA to appease China? Like NATOshould not have let Poland into a defence coalition to appease Russia? What are the arguments against Russia leaving Ukraine alone and China leaving Taiwan (in which framework ever) alone?
@richardlin6695
Жыл бұрын
Nobody has the right to determine the fate of the Taiwanese people. Only the Taiwanese people have the right to determine their own future
If people sincerely wish that at any cost we want peace and not war. Then there will be peace. But stuppid ego wont permit that.
@richardlin6695
Жыл бұрын
You need to consider the rights of the Taiwanese people. We never belonged to the Chinese communist party. The us started this one China policy and have marginalized the Taiwanese people for decades and decades. We are twenty three million strong and have the right to govern ourselves!! Not just a pawn that is being pushed around by other countries!! US made a commitment to protect Taiwan in the Taiwan relations act of 1979.
@stephen_pfrimmer
Жыл бұрын
own goal
@StewartChaimson
Жыл бұрын
Jessica Chen Weiss, Should we not be offended by China's not living up to its "one country two systems" in HK? And then not be prepared to help Taiwan if attacked? Do you suggest that these two things are "internal issues"?
@Waverlyduli
Жыл бұрын
Clearly Chen and Cornell University consider it their role in the US to run out a CCP line of reasoning at times like this. Let's guess how many CCP proxies are Cornell's largest donors, shall we?
@Honkytonkified
Жыл бұрын
12:30 Hmm, exactly what can Chinese people look at that shows USA as a good example of our values and the values of democracy?
@kevinjenner9502
Жыл бұрын
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen.
@beerman204
Жыл бұрын
your ability and right and protection in criticizing our government.....
@mimiwinarto9164
Жыл бұрын
Democrazy ala USA means divide, conquer, imposing sanctions, regime change, bombing and invasion.
@Handleit2024
Жыл бұрын
Good question - how about the fact that you were able to watch this interview and comment without fear of reprisal - try watching this interview on the government controlled internet in China.
@deanzaZZR
Жыл бұрын
I was always under the impression that diplomacy was the art of dialog and compromise. Blinken has spent 2 years lecturing and threatening China. I believe he's met with the Chinese Foreign Minister once (recent India conference) or possibly twice if we count the poorly planned public meeting early on in Anchorage.
@barryraymond9004
Жыл бұрын
China has been threatening and lecturing the USA since Xi took power. Now the USA has finally come to the realization that business with China is not worth the security problems and doesn't take anymore crap.
@Waverlyduli
Жыл бұрын
Very difficult to compromise or dialogue with an unmandated autocracy that commits genocide against its minorities, uses rape as torture and has its long-suffering Chinese held captive behind a digital firewall. As a bot, why don't you consider having a word to Ping-Mao and the CCP clown show.
@Kiki-en9vm
Жыл бұрын
Let's be honest,China is over stepping their boundaries when they have access to U.S market, but close their door to others comming to do same in their country.
@kevinjenner9502
Жыл бұрын
China exerts influence via economics. The US exerts influence via wars and coups.
@Laowei1
Жыл бұрын
China remains a developing country. Unfair statement. America is also protectionist. American markets are not fully open to foreign investment either. Welcome to the real world.
@iechuanlee9326
Жыл бұрын
What's the point when the US-Nato continues fueling the wars, a few peace deals had been stopped by the collective west. This is a good try but the US-Nato had to show committals.
@SunnyIlha
Жыл бұрын
Prevent? "Prevent" *what* It's already *been* happening for a long time!
@christiansmith-of7dt
Жыл бұрын
Cyberia
@normaidanan8117
Жыл бұрын
To avoid war bet. China and USA :: stop meddling with each political way of running each country ::: just cooperate on doing business with one another .. and share the power if both wants to be recognized as both superpowers ::::!
@soonpohtay4794
Жыл бұрын
The US wants a war with China except that they want to bear the costs. Get t Taiwan to be the ground, the Ozzies, South Koreans, Japanese to pay for it and Indians & P'ppines to pay the human costs.
@Waiting664
Жыл бұрын
Taiwan is issue
@georgelim3651
Жыл бұрын
This lady talks a lot of sense and unbiased in her views, instead of parroting the US mainstream anti-China narrative.
@cheemengsiew288
Жыл бұрын
It's not perceived containment It's explicit.. Its on play in the Media.. Almost daily..
@PriceTag5447
Жыл бұрын
The guest assumes China is the only country where United States can get talented people from? Isn’t it racist?
@Kotak8
Жыл бұрын
Ms. Jessica Weiss is the real China expert, and most rational in china-US relations strategy.
@andrewcbartlett
Жыл бұрын
I totally disagree with the Professor about Pelossi. More representatives of democratic governments should visit Taiwan not less. We must do everything we can to support the Chinese opposition to overthrow this disgusting regime.
@ntgoh
Жыл бұрын
US, Just open your eyes, visit China or if not, watch videos on China and compare this with current infrastructure state of US.... You will realise how far behind you are.
@abuhasanali2270
Жыл бұрын
y to prevent,it must start now....
@harrisng3041
Жыл бұрын
China. 🌷🍷 China has no issue with EU and the west, except for the silly issue of Miss Tsai. All Taiwan need to do is to celebrate in glory and honour and in songs.... It's return to the motherland. China doesn't care whether Taiwan is Communism or is Democrat. , As Long As It Is not the 51st STATE Of THE USA. .. HARRIS NG YM 🌱🇺🇸🇨🇳🍷🐇🐇🐰🐰🐰👍💰
@simonac688.
Жыл бұрын
Support Taiwan support Democracy 👍
@mugglescakesniffer3943
Жыл бұрын
We rely on china for a lot of products but it would be interesting if we had to make our own. Can you imagine how much toys would cost among other things we take for granted? Coffee machines, clothes etcetera.
@archiegoodwinjr
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Stated the way you have makes me use my brain which is probably what Amanpour and Company hopes would happen. It's pathetic and true. China's importance to us is in what goods it can supply. So if China did not exist we would have less stuff and, of course, the world would have 1 billion fewer people to deal with. Then what use is Australia to us? What use is Africa other than chromium, gold, platinum, cobalt, uranium? As a Greenpeacenik I would be happy to have 3 to 6 billion fewer people in the world. But as a real world person you make me wonder if we tolerate other geopolitical entities only because of what they can supply us.
@mugglescakesniffer3943
Жыл бұрын
@@archiegoodwinjr It is a kind of selfish bent huh but most Americans would look at it like where is my Coffee Maker I ordered it was supposed to get here in 2 days guaranteed! Sometimes people can not see past the end of their own nose or wallet. I am American and I know somewhat about logistics and how amazing it is that products get from China to your door or in the store. I have fears about this along with fears of nations giving The US sanctions. America is not squeaky clean by any stretch of the imagination. But I would rather live here than any other place. I value my freedoms and the blessings of living in the United states but I am not naive about America trying to do things to get things like oil and leaving those poor translators in Afghanistan and looking away at human rights violations when it suits them. I am frustrated by this. I still don't know why we would sell or give our oil reserves to anyone.
@barryraymond9004
Жыл бұрын
Its not hard to setup a factory in another country thats even cheaper than China.
@cheemengsiew288
Жыл бұрын
Don't count on it China gradually moving away USA got to learn6
@barryraymond9004
Жыл бұрын
@@cheemengsiew288 India is cheaper has has four times more working age people. China never sold land to western investors. Western investors don't actually own anything so moving production is easy.
@Waverlyduli
Жыл бұрын
Let's just take a minute to reflect on the reality that when today's interviewer and interviewee from Cornell university use the shorthand term "China", as in 'China thinks... China wants...' that they're should be speaking about the CCP un-mandated autocracy that has never put these or any other matters to a vote at a free and fair, multi-party, general election in China in its 74 year history. Exactly what a major aggregate of Chinese actually think about the notion of engaging in a kinetc war, or anything else, we'll never know. I've lived in China, and I can attest that the regime isn't popular nor trusted by Chinese people, yet there is indeed no safe mechanism for Chinese in China to express such feelings publically without censure and even danger to the critic and their family. Even abroad the habit of self censoring persists for most. I can promise you that the CCP's priorities around whether to engage in a hot war won't reference Chinese opinion, rather focus entirely the CCP Party's existential issues within Chinese rather to preserve power and privilege to the pampered red elite, descended from the CCP old guard and those CCP members whom Xi Jin Ping has not executed, imprisoned or intimidated into silence. The conventional reference to 'China' as a shorthand in media and political circles presumes normal Chinese have some input. 97% of Chinese choose not to be members of the CCP and are not allowed to vote anyway, so the expression is misleading. There is also this inexplicable asymmetry where speakers refer to "Putin" rather than 'Russia' in relation to the Ukraine invasion, which is reasonable enough since Russia leans toward autocracy and the invasion was in some large measure his project. However, in reference to the possibility of a Taiwan invasion many so called experts go soft and refuse to refer to Xi Jin Ping, opting instead for the conventional falsehood that such an obsession is a 'China' choice. This is an anomaly because the whole Taiwan project is presented in China's Chinese language media as being what Xi Jin Ping wants to be his legacy and claimed this on numerous occasions. It's his project, not China's. The reality is that Xi Jin Ping is an autocrat who has been driving the heightened militant attitude toward Taiwan. A better alternative approach would be to tell XI JIN PING to start taking responsibility for the stark problems that HIS policies have caused. Xi must end the militant approach to Democratic Taiwan; stop the jet flights past the midpoint in the Taiwan Strait, no more salami slicing Taiwan sovereignty; no more relentless grey warfare against Taiwan and within Taiwanese society and no more missiles annihilating sea life around Taiwan; an end to Xi Jin Ping tirades; and no more mindless propaganda in regard to Taiwan. He must also respect the sovereignty and legitimate sea claims of the Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Brunei and Malaysia in the Indo Pacific, including an end to the use of hundreds of militia boats pretending to be fishing vessels at anchor for years at a stretch in the Indo Pacific, terrorising the above nations. Finally, there's the matter of Xi Jin Ping's Nine Dash Line, itself, and his policy of unlawfully militarising islands in the Indo Pacific and not submitting to arbitration on the matter of territorial sovereignty regarding his outlandish claims of virtually the entire Indo Pacific to himself and the CCP. That's only some of the reality of Xi Jin Ping and the CCP's outlandish arrogance and intransigence which the world is up against, and so-called experts constantly urge us to appease or refer to as 'Chinese' choices.
@nikki088
Жыл бұрын
😂 lots of words but shallow perspective
@radio7970
Жыл бұрын
Wow!! Walter needed to bring up White Fear by Roland Martin. It’s white supremacy!
@ennediend2865
Жыл бұрын
TOO LATE... Mr XI WANTS IT SO : ANOTHER "VICTIM NARRATIVE" ...
@har8397
Жыл бұрын
I don't think she's in ccp's pocket... but she's certainly an apologist
@rainmanjr2007
Жыл бұрын
Allow U.N. and INTERPOL to make any criticisms of China and States Of America should withdraw any further individual comments about them. China should appreciate that and maybe work more with us instead of just growing more competition minded.
@kevinjenner9502
Жыл бұрын
We’ve already designated China an adversary and it would be logical for them to act in kind.
@alvinchua5211
Жыл бұрын
Shallow and ignorant replies
@GlobalDrifter1000
Жыл бұрын
Camo in the city 😂🤣😂
@ttacking_you
Жыл бұрын
I think I saw her on Jon Stewarts podcast, she looks sad😟
@quantumeseboy
Жыл бұрын
Confrontation with China is inevitable, the best thing to do is prepare for it.
@daviddunnigan8202
Жыл бұрын
Rewarding China for not doing something is absurd. China actions and words show no signs of cooperation and mutual respect. China has made this bed and shocking that they don’t like it. Academia and media have no feel for us folks that they believe are not as smart as they are. We don’t share common values which leaves a transactional relationship at best.
@nikki088
Жыл бұрын
But has the US ever respected China??? Or tried one bit to cross the cultural divide? Would you fawn at someone who’s prejudice towards you? You’re right in that the differences create a transactional relationship but western euro countries have never proven themselves as friendly.
@rainmanjr2007
Жыл бұрын
Isn't Chinese owned Tic-Toc within our gates already, Glenn?
@mugglescakesniffer3943
Жыл бұрын
So, China is kind of in a "choose your pain" thing.
@lennieunderscoreboy
Жыл бұрын
Manufacturing back into the west
@blissbrad8665
Жыл бұрын
It would be a really good time for China to straighten out all the border disputes that it has with Russia right now
@TomdeSabla
Жыл бұрын
All zero of them. China says their relationship with Russia is "rock solid" and will withstand any changes to the world geopolitical situation.
@jook360
Жыл бұрын
You mean India?
@TomdeSabla
Жыл бұрын
@@jook360 he doesn't know what he means
@deanzaZZR
Жыл бұрын
China helped create the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2001 with the initial goal to settle boundaries with all former Soviet republics that share a border with China, Russia included. This was a successful initiative for all.
@tonywyli
Жыл бұрын
We have already done that long time ago.
@beerman204
Жыл бұрын
Look what China has done with Hong Kong. Any sense of alarm over how China operates in the world is justified in my opinion. This guest seems to believe China is acting rationally and wants cooperation with the West, but the belligerent tone and hardball actions raises disturbing concerns in the West justifiably. She thinks the USA responds in a hostile and undiplomatic way to China, but how does one best respond to bullying behavior? She seems to give China a pass, or neglects to refer to such behavior.
@chenyenchengful
Жыл бұрын
Apparently, she does not know too much history of CPP. Or, she assumes that CPP is a rational party to deal with.
@ncberic
Жыл бұрын
What is your problem. Have u visit hong kong before? Just because some protest againts govt doesnt mean govt is evil. Now EU and US have hundrend of thousand protest againts war so what u call that. So in western u can have protestt but not in china?lastly can you mention 1 thing that china did which threathen you or affecting your livehood? Go visit china yourself you will understand why they are so succesful now and their ppl love their leader. Btw i m not from china but really sympathy with chinese bully by US so much almost like punching beg.
@jmbickham
Жыл бұрын
@@chenyenchengful Given what happened at the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party with Hu Jintao, I’d say that it’s not even a matter of the CCP, but rather the history of Xi Jinping since rising to power.
@Laowei1
Жыл бұрын
Your statement is based on fantasy, not reality. Hong Kong is part of China. Foreign interference and fear mongering were involved. Do not be fooled.
@nikki088
Жыл бұрын
Are you “alarmed” bc of what the media tells you? 😂
@normanori2741
Жыл бұрын
I agree not to poke China's domestic issues...but the problem was China's aggressive move in Asia claiming the whole South Sea which claimed by small countries, their bullies like ramming the fishermen boat, etc...International court ruling was illegal to their assertiveness. And Xi's speech several times will use force just to unite Taiwan. Who do you think change the world order? just because they became rich, powerful like Russia they don't regards the international order just to their imperialist objective.
@julioduan7130
9 ай бұрын
You are totally misinformed about all the issues you mentioned in this comment. Read and learn something different from the media what you are used to.
@CatalystD9
Жыл бұрын
First 😊
@RyanRuark
Жыл бұрын
We have a housing crisis but we should let Chinese investors buy American property. Lunacy.
Пікірлер: 177