WH2 performs better than WH3 on my laptop and doesn't take up over half my hard drive.
@digiorno1142
10 ай бұрын
It’s almost like warhammer 3 has like 2x as much content
@danielclark9546
Жыл бұрын
I kinda prefer how the campaign graphics in WH2 look more realistic. In WH3 they look more cartoon like
@toddfrombethesda6963
Жыл бұрын
No
@John-lf3iu
Жыл бұрын
Agree 100% I thought it was a shift in the wrong direction and was very disappointed!
@digiorno1142
10 ай бұрын
It’s literally just a higher res map
@tlip3480
10 ай бұрын
Agreed it looks different in a weird way.
@CarlosDiaz-je1bg
Жыл бұрын
I do like that you can dial back the battle cheats for the AI in 3. It just feels bad that the AI just gets stats buffs. The campaigns cheats I am OK with, it's just the straight Stat buffs that I don't like.
@allytank-itykitty7417
Жыл бұрын
I think the reason they get Stat buffs is that the AI cannot just get supremely better, and if it was just campaign stats then their armies would just be steamrolled by any good player. AI can only react in so many ways so it makes sense to buff the AI slightly to make up for the shortfall.
@CarlosDiaz-je1bg
Жыл бұрын
@@allytank-itykitty7417 yeah I get why they do it, but it's just a band-aid to cover up the AI shortcomings. Just look at the AI in old RTS games. Even back then they could manage to build bases, economies and attack and defend quite well. Changing the difficulty changed the ai and it's behavior. In 2023 I don't think it's too much to ask for a good Battle AI where it only needs to focus on battles.
@SpiritStoneWarrior94-yx3gs
8 ай бұрын
@CarlosDiaz-je1bg back then the graphics weren't as powerful/draining as they are now among many other things.
@PhilosophicallyAmerican
8 ай бұрын
I totally agree with the campaign cheats vs stat buffs. That's why I exclusively play Very Hard/Normal in my campaigns.
@zacharybecker8228
Жыл бұрын
I think the map was better in 2 for settlement placement and for resources ive noticed at least a dozen settlements that have lost their resource from 2 to 3 or hell even from realms to immortal
@botep5529
Жыл бұрын
I would disagree on the case of Imrik, having your third settlement in your first province across a mountain ridge was such an awful pain in the ass
@jonasfull
Жыл бұрын
Not like it matters but i personally preferred the less cartoonish graphics the 2nd game had (also regarding the spacing, i believe the map was just bigger and less compressed in warhammer 2, which partly is how i think they could fix Karl Franz by just expanding the empires territory and the spacing between the cities)
@Neothunder240
Жыл бұрын
Most of the assets are the same though. Having some actual colour because the lighting isn't washing everything out doesn't make the game more cartoony.
@artofox
4 ай бұрын
@@Neothunder240 Shaders are broken, especially skin shader [it was best in first game, like it or not], textures for all assets from first game are lower res plus inverted normals and speculars lol.
@Monsteretrope
8 ай бұрын
Unpopular opinion: Im not a fan of how many factions there are in wh3. The map is just flooded with LLs xD It feels anti-climatic to start near a bunch of them and take out several in a few rounds. That being said, I do like how you get to face various enemies at the start and not just the same faction as you play (Like in wh1 for the most part) I wish they added several more campaigns of different scales with different amounts of races. Or just a custom one where we get to pick.
@yuzustridh3794
Жыл бұрын
I play a lot of missile armies and it’s legitimately insane how many battles I’ve lost due to poor missile infantry behavior in Warhammer 3, I lost a battle just a few hours ago because my archers didn’t arc their shots and couldn’t land a single shot while the enemy throwing axes arc their shots, it was a battle I knew I would’ve won in Warhammer 2, I understand the missile nerfs but making them not arc shots was braindead
@mbo1086
Жыл бұрын
The performance during battles is better in tww3 at least on my pc though. And Im playing both games on max graphics
@robbedoes77
10 ай бұрын
I'm considering finally buying WH3 during the Winter Sale after about 300 hours in WH2 (still having fun). Reckon if it's worth it? Especially the performance (waiting longer) makes me question whether it's worth it? (samsung 970evo, Ryzen 7 2700x, rtx 2080 super)
@phillipspassmore
9 ай бұрын
Mixed experience. Generally load time is annoying. Warhammer 3 is good fun
@TheAlmighty972
5 ай бұрын
@@phillipspassmoreyou installed on a SSD ? Had it on a HDD insane loading times but after switching to ssd Max 60 sec
@maximum9977
Жыл бұрын
Visually wh3 is worse for me. And perfrormance is far worse I have about 1500 hours in wh2, and after about 200 hours i am done with wh3
@baseddepartment285
11 ай бұрын
I know it's a bad game anyway. But it's hardware bound. You need at least RTX 4070 Ti/RX 7900 XT and i7 13th gen or Ryzen 7 7000 series to play it comfortably on max settings at 1080p or 1440p.
@digiorno1142
10 ай бұрын
@@baseddepartment285Stop. I play on a 3060 ti and 10th gen intel i5 on 1440p highest graphic settings and the game runs perfectly fine.
@TheAlmighty972
5 ай бұрын
I have a 11 years old i7 with a GTX 1060 and I can play on high/ultra
@NuisanceFlute
19 күн бұрын
@@baseddepartment285I have a 1060 and TWW3 runs absolutely fine on high and ultra settings. However I feel the game is cramped with too many factions over small areas, the graphics look like a mobile game and the general feel is a massive downgrade from TWW2. I have over 4000 hours in 2 and about 90 in 3. I open new campaigns and it just feels shitty. The demons especially look cartoonish and really pull me out of the atmosphere. Also, the terrible maps and neon bloom on everything is just dogshit.
@sanguiniuscarn4116
Жыл бұрын
Felt in Warhammer 2 starts with his capital at tier 2.
@sanguiniuscarn4116
Жыл бұрын
Gelt*
@theemperor1379
11 ай бұрын
@@sanguiniuscarn4116You know you can just edit your comment right?
@Onl1fak
6 ай бұрын
Sieges in wh3 really piss me off, these labyrinths are stupid and pointless
@zacharybecker8228
Жыл бұрын
Some lord start positions were better in 2 as well
@007whiterussian2
Жыл бұрын
the only 2 things for me wh2 is better at is the campaign like intro cinematics and ranged units. the unit responsiveness of archers and guns in wh2 is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better in how they reform ranks and stuff and as a ranged faction enjoyer is is super frustrating to reposition ranged units and how you just kinda have to trust fire at will because if you right click there is a 90% chance they will just run into melee or do nothing. But besides that i think wh3 is a net improvement
@kaydens6964
9 ай бұрын
What kind of improvement are we talking about? Looking into buying during the winter sale.
@connorjohn5013
8 ай бұрын
@@kaydens6964i bought it… yeah overall it’s better becasue of new factions and continuation of the game, also you have more options when it comes to diplomacy. But the general AI of the untis are dog crap compared to wh2. I’m just not used to babysit everyone to do their job correctly, like the oc told missile units tend to forget to fire at will. I don’t know if the leadership is too strong but i find myself many times that my heroes or lord just stuck into a blob and start to flee at 1% health and then die to a stronger wind or something. Or my lord just stops attacking in a 1v1 situation… so i think it’s just not finished when it comes to AI don’t know why they had to do that.
@hohenzollern6025
Жыл бұрын
As an aside, am happy to see the campaign mini map bug affect someone other than me. Wasnt sure if that was one of my mods, or just CA being CA, and leaving such an annoying bug unfixed for a decade. Having Ironrock show the wrong color after playing a battle in any/every game has always annoyed me mostly because most of my games are focused around that area, as even when not a greenie or dwarf, I still tend to migrate there. The area is too rich and easily defended, especially for someone like Throgg, who gets no walls. Why has nobody ever thought to fix that annoying little issue?
@fcztyuo876b6
Жыл бұрын
Agreed on your take with battle impact-fulness. It just feels Raw in 2.
@via_negativa6183
Жыл бұрын
Problem with this take is combat is such a huge part of the game and as a grand strategy game it's pretty lacklustre due to all the streamlining the franchise has received over the years. I think wh2 was better wh3 just has more content.
@SpiritStoneWarrior94-yx3gs
8 ай бұрын
Ohh wow a game that was out for 4 years before the current one has more content...... what a shocking revelation 😂😂
@PhilosophicallyAmerican
8 ай бұрын
@@SpiritStoneWarrior94-yx3gs In what world is two > three?
@Mushimiya
2 ай бұрын
@@SpiritStoneWarrior94-yx3gs Do you have reading comprehension issues?
Пікірлер: 45