Thanks Peter. Don’t worry about the disclaimer. I know this is required and you make the best of it.
@ruuddirks5565
10 ай бұрын
This is exactly what I need. Thanks.
@bobknight5261
3 ай бұрын
The clarity of the image featuring the bike is compromised by the sharply defined figures of the person and dog in the background. This aligns with Excire's decision, as reducing their sharpness would enhance the overall quality of the image.
@edgarsteele
10 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video Peter. I purchased this software a day before seeing your video, so unfortunately did not use your affiliate link. One thing- your video is titled “I need this” - however it’s not clear to me from your video what about this software makes it something you need. Can you explain what you find most useful about this software, and how you use it in your workflow?
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
No worries. I will make some more content about this software. In those I will explain more why I need it.
@edgarsteele
10 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeterthank you Peter, I’ll look forward to that. I have a giant mess of a photo collection, and I’m hoping this software will enable me to organize it quickly. Instead of what would probably take me years to organize what I have, I’m hoping this software can get it done by the end of this year. I use Lightroom, and am curious to learn a workflow to use Excire Foto along with Lightroom to organize my massive collection. Thanks again!
@hauke3644
10 ай бұрын
Quite interesting, but a bit expensive for private use. Do you know if it runs completely on your machine or do they use any cloud service in the background (as is often the case with ai-powered software)?
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
I think it runs on your computer and does not use cloud.
@19Photographer76
10 ай бұрын
Does Excire Foto and Search have the same search functionality. I'm thinking that the full program would be better as it has AI to assist.
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
Yes.
@swisswildpicsswp3095
9 ай бұрын
Can it train itself? version 2022 was pretty crappy with faces. Shame we can't tell the software which are good matches and which are bad, to help train it do better next time
@ForsgardPeter
9 ай бұрын
It cannot. I know that would be cool if it could. This new version works better than the previous version. It is still not perfect and it does not have to be. I have been happy with older version as I am now with the newer version.
@swisswildpicsswp3095
9 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter Good for you. I know I'm not happy. AI can do so much today, and yet no company can provide a decent, trainable software with regular updates, even for more than a 100$. Sure, Excire 2024 is nice (I'm currently trying the trial version) but it's nowhere near perfect, and that's a shame
@bamsemh1
10 ай бұрын
If it's available for mobile units, sure thing. But I have my doubts that anyone will be as flexible and good as Adobe 😬
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
Excire Foto is something that Adobe does not have, at least yet.
@bamsemh1
10 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeterwell Adobe have something nobody else have 😊 mobile units availability
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
That is true, but not this type of search.
@d1m18
25 күн бұрын
Only works for Portrait or wedding photography in my opinion - sadly
@ForsgardPeter
24 күн бұрын
Wedding and Portrait photographers can handle their images without this software. It is quite easy to keyword those. I think it comes in handy when there are wide selection of different subjects. That type of photos are a lot harder to keyword and Excire will help a lot.
@d1m18
23 күн бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter I understand your view. I tried it with many types of wildlife photos and was not of much benefit. That is where I am coming from
@brucekraft744
10 ай бұрын
I tried their crap once, and no thanks. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice ...
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
What has been the biggest problem for you. Which one have you used before, Foto 2022 or Search 2022?
@brucekraft744
10 ай бұрын
Search. It was so inaccurate that it was perfectly useless. Missed many subjects and misidentified just as many. Put a lot of crap into my metadata.
@ForsgardPeter
10 ай бұрын
Sorry to hear this. In have found it quite ok. It is not perfect, but good enough.
@montre-moi
9 ай бұрын
Same here. It was pretty inaccurate, especially with faces. Apple did a better job 10 years ago. Shame they don't want to let PC user use their tech.
@fotografie-joerglang
10 ай бұрын
Since I do not use closed operating systems, it is out of the question for me, so it is rather uninteresting for me.
Пікірлер: 34