Ad - 0:00 Games : Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28 Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38 Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32 Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40 Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47 Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42 Death Stranding - 7:55 System: Windows 10 Pro Intel i9 10900K 3.7GHz - bit.ly/2YcPUkI MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs Core i9 11900K 5.3GHz - bit.ly/3foHCiQ ASUS ROG Z590 Maximus XIII Hero - bit.ly/3m1kZSE CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa - bit.ly/3f999kE GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp 32Gb RAM DDR4 3800Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
@angumech13
3 жыл бұрын
In future, can you add the prices in USD (MSRP may be) in brackets after the product name? This way we can easily get to know the price to performance improvement.
@pandasdreamlygon
3 жыл бұрын
can you test i9 9900k vs 11900k
@user-qu6ql9rs9x
3 жыл бұрын
Next 4750G(Vega8) vs i9 11900K(UHD 750)
@knnym-5429
3 жыл бұрын
HI T-G. CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO WITH INTEL UHD 750 GRAPHICS? PLEASE
@HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear
3 жыл бұрын
How much money did intel pay you to make 11900k look good?
@siddhantkamble9502
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for listening to the comments and keeping avg fps for the whole segment
@Hot_Dog2009
3 жыл бұрын
guys the 11900k has more cache nad has more kb
@siddhantkamble9502
3 жыл бұрын
@@Hot_Dog2009 dont remember asking that
@maulcs
3 жыл бұрын
@@Hot_Dog2009 What? The 10900k has more cache.
@remestario
3 жыл бұрын
Clearly the 10900k build had no RGB with it
@RandomBruv65
3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@tryingtobebetter2937
3 жыл бұрын
Xd
@bradleymasangkay818
3 жыл бұрын
What?
@DanielOfRussia
3 жыл бұрын
Funny.
@gamingedition5165
3 жыл бұрын
@@bradleymasangkay818 didn’t know? Rgb increase performance atleast another 50%+
@jannclaudebinoya
3 жыл бұрын
For only $100 more, you get 2 less cores! It just works!
@Dredzys
3 жыл бұрын
But more FPS
@copiedcomment6958
3 жыл бұрын
Thumbnail shows its 40 dollar extra only.
@shreyasdharashivkar8027
3 жыл бұрын
Don't get MAD get AMD 🙂
@Dredzys
3 жыл бұрын
@Captain Price that's true lol
@bufdud4
3 жыл бұрын
@@Dredzys you won't feel 4-5 fps difference, but you will feel 2 less cores and 4 less less threads.
@get-in-2-get-out774
3 жыл бұрын
I would still take those 10 Cores from last gen. But hey Intel, it's just me.
@tnbn55
3 жыл бұрын
I think their idea is less cores = less heat. But yeah, the 10-core from 2020, will still be really good 6 years from now.
@Ahmed_onYT
3 жыл бұрын
@@tnbn55 wtf is that idea i see no diffrence
@Ahmed_onYT
3 жыл бұрын
@@SpideronOfficial 10000000 cores with 1c
@fenix_tx_1342
3 жыл бұрын
@@Ahmed_onYT what he is saying is that the 10 core cpu will age better, and it will.
@A.Froster
3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes more power , more heat , less cores for 5 fps , nice Intel !
@MrBugl17
3 жыл бұрын
Procesors are not only for gaming sherlok
@matteo_petruz1435
3 жыл бұрын
Where more power?
@EVOLVED_1
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrBugl17 , ok so if it is not for gaming ,it is for big workload , good luck work with that gen with less cores and bigger temperatures
@pascalml1408
3 жыл бұрын
@@matteo_petruz1435 many trustworthy sources like Ltt have found that the 11900k consumes around 20% more power while gaming then the 10900k
@RodolfoHernandez-sq3zc
3 жыл бұрын
There are so many comments like this and I don’t really understand, so is it worth it to get the i9 11th gen?
@user-bw6ki8ke4r
3 жыл бұрын
This is a real Intel moment.
@iiillliiill5917
3 жыл бұрын
*ePiC gAmEr mOMeNt*
@shreyasdharashivkar8027
3 жыл бұрын
Dont get MAD get AMD 🙂
@Abysswdh
3 жыл бұрын
@ nice roast xD
@adityarudrabhatla
3 жыл бұрын
anyone with any bit of braincells will know that the 10900k is better in productiviy coz of its 2 extra cores and gaming is like a pathetic draw so unless u need some of the stuff of 11900k like PCIe Gen4 then anyone with 1 braincell in their head will buy a 10900k
@adityarudrabhatla
3 жыл бұрын
or buy amd lol amd ryezen 7 5800x is better or ties with a flagship core i9 11900k lmao and costs a 100$ less
@falcone5287
3 жыл бұрын
nobody: Intel: evolves backwards
@mutedeternal690
3 жыл бұрын
More like Devolved
@aarizshaikh1379
3 жыл бұрын
@@mutedeternal690 How ? There is improvement in almost all the games.
@foolishvfx
3 жыл бұрын
@@aarizshaikh1379 lmao the i9 10900k has 10 cores and its cheaper and it is equal or better in every game
@aarizshaikh1379
3 жыл бұрын
@@foolishvfx Better in every game ? How ?
@MrKemby13
3 жыл бұрын
10900K is better acording to every important and trustworthy reviewer online such as Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus and some others. Anyway, 11th gen i9 is a mega fail, all but i5 11400 and maybe i5 11600K - depending on your local prices are not worth buying.
@shyleshvr9748
3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes a 6 fps increase for just 40 $
@xboxnerd4759
3 жыл бұрын
And less cores
@MasterGT1st
3 жыл бұрын
And you lose 2c4t Intel have outdone itself. But remember there is also a new logo I think that's the real value for your money
@ericpisch2732
3 жыл бұрын
If your using a 10 year old monitor, have to wait for a professional tester to release 4K ultra comparisons for this to mean anything
@pandasdreamlygon
3 жыл бұрын
@@MasterGT1st yep you pay for the new logo hahaha
@strelok9376
3 жыл бұрын
And more power
@freshp8936
3 жыл бұрын
10900k 10/20 11900k 8/16' intel is a meme
@RandomBruv65
3 жыл бұрын
Intel is killing itself they just wanna increase clock speed and decrease cores and threads
@patrickstar514
3 жыл бұрын
12900К 6/12!
@GabbyTech
3 жыл бұрын
well said my friend
@freshp8936
3 жыл бұрын
@@patrickstar514 hahahahha
@igm1571
3 жыл бұрын
I see i9 with only 1 core
@bertro514
3 жыл бұрын
For MSFS, I recommend flying in the cockpit of the Airbus A320 above a busy city. That's where MSFS relies heavily on CPU to drive the plane's displays and to auto-generate the buildings. It's a really good test for single-core performance.
@4rshhh
3 жыл бұрын
The improvements in the 11th gen is massive especially at 4:50
@zarzul697
3 жыл бұрын
lmao
@setesheol
3 жыл бұрын
intel was probably on crack when they thought of releasing this gen like this
@saricubra2867
3 жыл бұрын
@@setesheol You mean this processor. i7 is an improvement over previous gen, i5 too.
@setesheol
3 жыл бұрын
@@saricubra2867 they messed their flagship cpus up
@saricubra2867
3 жыл бұрын
@@setesheol That 11900K is such a weird improvement and downgrade at the same time.
@ilovepizza8263
2 жыл бұрын
I just built my pc with 11900k rtx 3080 and 64gb ram with 2 tb ssd 4.0 it’s fucking awesome and runs any game at all max settings 🔥🔥🔥
@MatarTechPC
3 жыл бұрын
the extra FPS on the 11900K mostly is from the extra 100MHZ clock speeds
@MrPirateking619
3 жыл бұрын
Lol u don't get almost 10% improvement frm 100mhz alone
@andreiionut6947
3 жыл бұрын
No, it comes from the new architecture.
@natlus_
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrPirateking619 it’s closer to 5%, also new microarchitecture.
@rishirajsaikia1323
3 жыл бұрын
@Tanjiro cpu usage also depends on core count. Higher core count a cpu has, the lesser percentage will be utilized by gaming. Threadripper might get 10% cpu utilisation but will still be slower than 5900x for gaming.
@strider5119
2 жыл бұрын
@Tanjiro cpu usage is higher on the 11900k because it has less cores/threads. CPU usage is not a good way to measure anything
@saricubra2867
3 жыл бұрын
i9-11900K: "I'm the worst 8 core CPU for the price". i7-9700K: "I'm way worse than you, no hyperthreading" .
@ZygardeCruiser
2 жыл бұрын
Intel Celeron: You f### with me right…
@bagels377
3 жыл бұрын
Why don't you fly over cities and large airports for the msfs clips? Really show the performance for places people will mostly be.
@adhidev1254
3 жыл бұрын
rdr2 be like: return to 10th gen
@aarizshaikh1379
3 жыл бұрын
Rest All other Games - It's time to upgrade !
@adhidev1254
3 жыл бұрын
@@aarizshaikh1379 not really extra money for just 5 more fps? and less cores and threads?
@aarizshaikh1379
3 жыл бұрын
@Crzh No I won't upgrade but if you have a less powerful cpu then you should.
@poedottaviano6924
3 жыл бұрын
@@aarizshaikh1379 Not really. As the 11900k runs more money, is a major risk to oc to 5.2 stable, you'll need a bigger p.s as per cores it drains far more power, and extra heat you'll need a 360m to oc with it. And this test was done with the 11900k oc 100hz higher as well. Btw: For 4K gaming these are identical. Also review sites have these as identical.
@richard35791
3 жыл бұрын
@@aarizshaikh1379 bruh, better i9 10850k almost same performance but way less money
@JordanHypocrite
3 жыл бұрын
The real deal is the i9-10850k for $400 as its been listed that price at many retailers lately, 10 Cores and 20 Threads that are cheaper than a Ryzen 7 5800x
@niklasniklasniklas1
3 жыл бұрын
10900K owner here. I'll return in 5 years. Let's see if it still holds up then.
@Rukariosake
3 жыл бұрын
if game ever use AVX-512... oh boy
@niklasniklasniklas1
3 жыл бұрын
I'm a bit weird tho, i miss my old 8700K. Don't know why but that system was so well balanced. 8700K with 1080 Ti.
@John__K
3 жыл бұрын
My friend with his OC'ed 3770K from ~10 years ago is still running games at high settings 4k ~60fps so yea... see you all in 10 years.
@strider5119
2 жыл бұрын
I think the 10900k will be good for years to come. High core count, hyperthreading and decent clocks. Anything from even the 9600 onwards is fairly future proof.
@Adam-zw9or
3 жыл бұрын
You should do i5 11400f vs i5 10400f vs ryzen 5 5600x/ ryzen 5 3600
@gameseduuudabahia8248
3 жыл бұрын
Ryzen 5 5600X VS Intel Core I5 11600K
@Sokol10
3 жыл бұрын
@@gameseduuudabahia8248 In this 1x1 5600X will win, a test like Adm37 suggest is more interesting, to see the real improvement from 10ª to 11ª of i5.
@gameseduuudabahia8248
3 жыл бұрын
@@Sokol10 you speak portuguese?
@edward3709
3 жыл бұрын
@@gameseduuudabahia8248 5600x costs the same as the i7 11700 here... interesting
@INFERNALCARD
3 жыл бұрын
4:51 real oof
@destman
3 жыл бұрын
3:45 / 4:15
@joshuapicarello
3 жыл бұрын
I will say this. It's a breath of fresh air seeing Intel use a brand new architecture. Just wish they went with 10nm as planned, since this new design was built around the smaller process. So it's no wonder 11th gen has such small gains. Hopefully 12th gen will bring better performance, but only time will tell. And as a side note, the 11900k is selling for $1100 on Amazon currently. More than double the launch MSRP of the 10900k, with 2 less cores and 4 less threads. Wtf is Intel thinking? My stock 5600x was $299 MSRP and sometimes beat out an overclocked 10900k. So to charge so much for marginally better performance with fewer cores is rather funny and embarrassing.
@ptq32t
3 жыл бұрын
8 cores won't last as long as 10 cores. i saw the 10900k beating the 11900k in warzone in another video. Why are these benchmarks showing the opposite results in different videos?
@strider5119
2 жыл бұрын
Probably depends on the settings and system. You can milk a lot by tweaking it all. Some people probably deliberately tip results towards one
@leoSaunders
3 жыл бұрын
11900k > 10900k -- 1080p -- 1% fps 0% -- Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29 -1% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28 14% -- Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38 -1% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32 1% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40 0% -- Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47 4% -- Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42 3% -- Death Stranding - 7:55 2.44% -- 1% avg (0.83% without MSF) -1% -- Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29 -9% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28 46% -- Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38 0% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32 2% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40 3% -- Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47 1% -- Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42 4% -- Death Stranding - 7:55 5.89% -- .1% avg (without MSF, 0.13% .1% avg)
@multifaceteddoall
3 жыл бұрын
I think it would be nice to make MSFS20 video somewhere like New York city, it is in cities where the components get really taxed in the game.
@iLeicha
3 жыл бұрын
Too bad, it's the end of the winter, Otherwise, I will buy i9 11900k and use it as heating device in my room
@heartbroken3344
3 жыл бұрын
Bought 10900k and absolutely happy with it.
@Shadowz2X
2 жыл бұрын
Is the 10900k better then the 119k I heard it’s better cause it has more cores
@heartbroken3344
2 жыл бұрын
@@Shadowz2X I’m not sure, but I think it is, anyway go for 12900k if you can
@Shadowz2X
2 жыл бұрын
@@heartbroken3344 that’s past my budget I just got the 10900k and me and my friend are gunna install it this is gunna be fire 🔥
@eazenx5178
2 жыл бұрын
@@Shadowz2X So how is it do far ?
@FIVESTRZ
3 жыл бұрын
The fact that the 10900K is $409 and widely available makes me feel like Intel is going for the mastermind plays releasing this product. It's a 9900KS for gamers, creatives it may be a different story but man... 10850K for $330 or 10900KF for $370 its pretty much a flip our old flagships into value chips that go up against Ryzen 5000 in performance per dollar
@matcor2969
3 жыл бұрын
Hope 12th gen'll focus more on the multi-core aspect
@optimum2998
3 жыл бұрын
Intel said that there 11gen is just a gap filler and 12gen would be released soon this year which will be based on 10nm .The name is alder lake s
@iAdam43
Жыл бұрын
This man predicted future
@KakXPR
3 жыл бұрын
thank you very much finally my request made a video about this, thank you TG
@jpgarcia6282
3 жыл бұрын
0 stock gpu, the most important thing now is .... UHD Graphics 730 (i5 11400) vs UHD graphics 750 (i5 11500/11600/11700/11900). 2021 with intel iGPU. Facepalm
@anisbenz4715
3 жыл бұрын
Do these videos please 1-i7-11700k vs i9-10900k 4-i5-11600k vs i5-10600k 2-i7-11700k vs i9-11900k 5-i5-11600k vs i7-10700k 3-i7-11700k vs i7-10700k
@xiaochengsgear576
3 жыл бұрын
just frequency difference I think. Please OC 10900k to 5.3 ghz , then compare both
@g2amarketplace506
3 жыл бұрын
2:48 0.1% low is extremly increased.
@FudoDrmex
3 жыл бұрын
true
@DanielOfRussia
3 жыл бұрын
Don't ever pay attention to 0.1% margin with higher-end chips like this. Margin of error, nothing more.
@wolker213
3 жыл бұрын
It random in this game, it could be in reverse if you run it again.
@DanielOfRussia
3 жыл бұрын
@@wolker213 Not just in this game lmao. In any. Read my previous comment.
@g2amarketplace506
3 жыл бұрын
@@DanielOfRussia But accoridng to gamersnexus 11600k's video, better cpu gets better 0.1% low. I don't know if the channel is trustworthy.
@3sixty254
3 жыл бұрын
So Basically i9 11900k is an over locked version of i9 10900k with lower cores.It seems that Intel have solved 2+2. Intel be like:That was easy
@MrBugl17
3 жыл бұрын
We live in times that things dont get better anymore. Its just money that matters
@sagerdood
3 жыл бұрын
Id really like to see rocket lake overclocked with well tunned ram, ill have it in a few days to actually test out of stock
@CrackaSlapYa
3 жыл бұрын
Not true at all. 10900k is better, period. It overclocks better, too.
@sagerdood
3 жыл бұрын
@@CrackaSlapYa you have one?
@sagerdood
3 жыл бұрын
@@CrackaSlapYa theres zero oc results out so either you have one or you have no idea, it hit 7ghz on ln so theres headroom
@CarlosRodriguez-qv9pp
3 жыл бұрын
*It's evolving, just backwards*
@pktgako
Жыл бұрын
And this is the reason why you must always do research before you buy something.
@arenzricodexd4409
3 жыл бұрын
we need brand new 8C/16T on the newest architecture on sub $150 already.
@AppleUK2000
3 жыл бұрын
Great video! What voltage did you need to achieve 5.2ghz all core on the 10900K?
@maulcs
3 жыл бұрын
Do you have a 10900k? I can only reach 5.1 GHz stable with a 360 aio. I have a feeling people claiming 5.2 and above aren't testing for true stability. There are some golden chips out there, but 5.2 stable definitely isn't common.
@AppleUK2000
3 жыл бұрын
@@maulcs Hi I have an i9 10900KF with an MSI Z490 Tomahawk. I have an NH-D15S. I haven't overclocked besides selecting Game Boost in the BIOS, which I believe sets the CPU Voltage to 1.35V and now I get 5.4GHZ on a single core. I've come from a 4C/4T 3.75Ghz so am blown away with performance! I probably won't overclock now
@AppleUK2000
3 жыл бұрын
@@maulcs Just a quick update, I've managed to overclock to 5.2GHZ all core with a CPU Voltage of 1.32v, hope that helps:)
@maulcs
3 жыл бұрын
@@AppleUK2000 Have you ran any tests for stability? You should be using something like Intel Burn Test on very high, and the RealBench stress test while looking for Windows Hardware Errors at the bottom of HWinfo.
@HOTPLATEGAMING
3 жыл бұрын
@@AppleUK2000 Managed but it probably isn’t stable
@sonesh4207
3 жыл бұрын
Only increase in price ?
@strelok9376
3 жыл бұрын
No cpu power also increase
@user-gs1df1fp7p
3 жыл бұрын
А почему при тесте процессоров почти всегда игры в разрешении FHD? Неужели так трудно убрать нагрузку на видеокарту используя HD и отключая всякие сглаживания? Результат более достоверный получиться... oder..?
@alicankirici6302
3 жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard on RD2 fps. It should be called "Generation Leap" by Intel 😆
@bradleymasangkay818
3 жыл бұрын
Sad but true
@pranithgeddapu3432
3 жыл бұрын
Ok so you see the very rare benchmark that has a decrease, while all the rest of the benchmarks have a general increase. Ok. Besides, basically everyone, for months now, new Rocket lake was going to be a dud and a stop gate till alder lake. Like cmon man if you were really expecting anything more, you had to be either be an intel fan boy or really believe in their marketing lmao
@bradleymasangkay818
3 жыл бұрын
@@pranithgeddapu3432 yeah right
@pranithgeddapu3432
3 жыл бұрын
@@bradleymasangkay818 wdym. What part of what I said was hard to believe
@anisbenz4715
3 жыл бұрын
Brother what version of MSI afterburner you using??
@rahulravishankar3152
3 жыл бұрын
for $10 more, you can have the Ryzen 9 5900X which has 4 more cores, 8 more threads, lower temperatures, lower power draw, better performance, cheaper motherboards and the ability to overclock on cheaper motherboards.
@darkwolf1739
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think it has better gaming performance unless you focus on games like csgo or vice versa with say watchdogs. Honestly I do have to wonder why someone would game on a 5900x when the 5600x and 5800x exist and will give roughly the same performance, hell a 5800x has the same cores and threads and will be alot cheaper.
@rahulravishankar3152
3 жыл бұрын
@@darkwolf1739 it has better gaming performance and beats the 11900K everywhere. Just watch linus tech tips review lol. Also, the 5900X has slightly better performance than the 5800X in games.
@user-om6qr3yo2l
3 жыл бұрын
yeah? where can i find it? cheapest one that is in stock is like $900
@pevinho3845
3 жыл бұрын
i7 10700 vs i7 11700 test 🥺 i7 10700 vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺 i7 11700 vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺 i5 11600K vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺 Plzzzzzzz ..............
@strelok9376
3 жыл бұрын
Amd FTW Intel WTF ?
@imadeddinemouzai6548
3 жыл бұрын
intel will take years to achieve the difference that AMD made between zen 2 and zen 3
@vicky-wd6oe
3 жыл бұрын
Nope zen 2 already killed by intel and 3 will soon at 12th gen based of 5 and 3 nm processor by intel with tsmc
@zahidshabir4038
3 жыл бұрын
WTF you on about. Intel were ahead in gaming for years and AMD just caught up to them with Zen 3 which is the main reason why they had a huge performance difference between their current and last generation processors because before Zen 3 AMD were only ahead in productivity and multi core workloads. They don't have a major reason besides competition for having a huge performance differences between 2 generations of processors
@zahidshabir4038
3 жыл бұрын
@@tyl7356 I never said Intel was better than AMD I even use a Ryzen 7 5800x processor. I am just stating that the comment regarding Intel never catching up to AMD or making such a huge performance difference like Zen 2 to Zen 3 for gaming was is just BS
@baconbreadwithbacon
3 жыл бұрын
You can buy a 10900k confidential SKU from Aliexpress for $346, (at current time of checking). Store is called SZCPU Store. Saves you money. I have a rig with one. Solid. It's running at 5ghz at 1.37v. It gets hot but it's custom watercooled. Hits 73C on stress test. Not bad.
@wicked9299
3 жыл бұрын
Test I9 11900k vs ryzen 9 5950x pls
@CrackaSlapYa
3 жыл бұрын
why?
@wicked9299
3 жыл бұрын
@@CrackaSlapYa to see performance of both
@CrackaSlapYa
3 жыл бұрын
@@wicked9299 i can tell you now- 5950x wins , at twice the price.
@ahsanulgf63
3 жыл бұрын
$540 vs $800 haha😆
@wicked9299
3 жыл бұрын
@@CrackaSlapYa at single core both are same 🤫😶🙄
@jlgroovetek
Жыл бұрын
Out of interest, I assume the 3800mhz DDR4 kit was run with XMP on. Does this mean for the 11900K it was running in Gear 2? Or did you run the kit at a lower speed so that you could keep it at Gear 1?
@user-uh9ic6mw1h
2 жыл бұрын
Да, впечатление двоякое. С одной стороны, вроде у 11900К FPS больше, но у 10900К минимальный FPS больше, значит, при игре картинка стабильней будет, просадок меньше. А в RDR вообще новый процессор откровенно сливает.
@Alpha077
3 жыл бұрын
Can you do Vega 11 vs UHD 750?
@ammanus356
2 жыл бұрын
Why are you testing at 1080p on high settings for cpu tests? Should be 720p low settings since there's games here that are heavily GPU bottlenecked
@seiysen5634
3 жыл бұрын
-Well what did you get A slower cpu in multitasking but he is 3% better in video game
@strelok9376
3 жыл бұрын
Also lower 4:50
@GabbyTech
3 жыл бұрын
5.3ghz vs 5,2ghz
@MrMaKeMeDiNnEr
2 жыл бұрын
Idk about you guys but for me i9 11900k was a good purchase. I got it cheaper than 10900k and yes I know AMD has better hardware for the money. I just have been using Intel since i started on PC and i feel more comfortable with it.
@habman
3 жыл бұрын
Small difference between them!! i9 11900k should be 12 c/24 t with 24 mb cache memory!!
@iiillliiill5917
3 жыл бұрын
Guys, Intel is evolving Just backwards....
@RandomBruv65
3 жыл бұрын
Yea
@iiillliiill5917
3 жыл бұрын
@ well, I have a Intel CPU lmao
@DanielOfRussia
3 жыл бұрын
Funny.
@XChristmasManX
3 жыл бұрын
@@DanielOfRussia sucka...
@ilkerYT
2 жыл бұрын
I highly doubt that u use CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa as u listed in the descb.
@gameseduuudabahia8248
3 жыл бұрын
Testing Minecraft!
@nicbruv
2 жыл бұрын
Now I kinda regret buying the i9-11900KF. Should've waited for i9 12th gen tbh
@supergenius74
2 жыл бұрын
thanks for the vid, funny how fs2020 is almost twice has hard as any other game. Would be nice to see it flying over a metropolis with bad weather etc.
@jayrodriguez439
3 жыл бұрын
Those power draws!
@Mostan_Games
3 жыл бұрын
Nice 5 fps improvement
@KjllShot
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if they had of used 10 of the newer core's, but no that's too big of a technological jump, gotta milk it
@babawicky
3 жыл бұрын
which osd do u use?? can u please tell🙂🙃
@udayvickyka1366
3 жыл бұрын
4:55 looks so funny
@Salty.Peasants
3 жыл бұрын
7:55 - Now I know why Newegg bundles the i9 11900k with this game.
@AlexVillaStudios
3 жыл бұрын
And i was thinking that PCIe gen 4 would make a difference... Im happy that i kept my 10900k......
@santinobracaioli5318
3 жыл бұрын
And don't forget the new box!!!
@rarespanait3842
3 жыл бұрын
Still, I'm very glad of my 10900k, got it for cheaper than a 7 5800x here, in romania, and it has 2 more cores and less consumption, more future proof
@dex2531
3 жыл бұрын
That's a nice joke. Lol
@verendale1789
3 жыл бұрын
@@dex2531 It's not actually 10850K or 10900K can be frequently found for less than a 5800X around balkans.
@TheVillainOfTheYear
3 жыл бұрын
Is PCIe 4.0 the differentiating factor? Rerunning with a 2080 Ti might be helpful. Also, since Of Results vary, can you set both to 5.2 GHz?
@ArtIV
3 жыл бұрын
What's the point? The only significance to upgrading to PCI-E 4.0 is the storage speed. The 2080 Ti will perform about the same on gen 3 speeds, maybe at a loss from 1 - 4 fps
@TheNickLavender
3 жыл бұрын
I was just curious as to why the 10900k was set to 5.2MHZ and the 11900K was set to 5.3MHZ? I would think that if the 10900K had been set to 5.3 as well, the results would probably have been nearly identical?
@darkwolf1739
3 жыл бұрын
100mhz is barely anything, it wouldn't be really any closer while being much less stable and probably giving lower 1% lows
@NEO3844
3 жыл бұрын
his 10900k can't oc to 5.3g
@bryanelizalde2188
3 жыл бұрын
150w that's impressive.
@kashifmughal5532
3 жыл бұрын
10900k clocked at 5.3Ghz, thats why you're getting a 5 fps increase with the 11900k otherwise its the same result if not better with the 10900k.
@jaassil
3 жыл бұрын
@@YOU-ot9ep shut the fuck... my 10900k do 5.4ghz easy rock solid. if the intention was compare, they should use same clocks.
@lolickypeepee23xdd6
3 жыл бұрын
to make things worse this tiny increase is basically a best case scenario as i really doubt anyone buying a 500 dollar cpu is gonna be running 1080p anyway, 10900k was and still is a way better deal as it still has more cores and threads
@gabrielonatyu
3 жыл бұрын
Intel: new 11 gen cpu more 100mhz clock more 4fps, stonks!
@marcosnovoa2296
3 жыл бұрын
10900K running at 3.7GHz, 11900K running at 5.3GHz, this is an unfaire comparison. Intel pay you guys for this?
@nickconstantinou4570
3 жыл бұрын
Did these tests have resizable bar enabled?
@ahmetoyunbros3402
3 жыл бұрын
you used to do i7 vs i9 video🤣🤣
@silentserge89
3 жыл бұрын
Bye intel, Hi AMD. LMAO
@user-qu6ql9rs9x
3 жыл бұрын
Next 4750G(Vega8) vs i9 11900K(UHD 750)
@gunslinger9786
3 жыл бұрын
Everyone crying about the less cores and threads, I don't need more then 8 cores, almost no one does, quit your crying.
@airnote9578
3 жыл бұрын
11900k is not worth it and im perfectly happy with my 10900k LMAO
@_M27_
3 жыл бұрын
Should I go for an 9900k or 10700k I can get one roughly the same price??
@darkwolf1739
3 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/uaZvuXqaeneGfoI
@JeYo91004
3 жыл бұрын
theyre the exact same cpu just different sockets so go with the one that ur mobo u plan on getting supports
@user-om6qr3yo2l
3 жыл бұрын
10700k, 9900k is worse and it is a dead en
@trencough4
3 жыл бұрын
Nobody should be buying the 11900k unless they have money to burn, in which case they should be buying a 5950x or 3990x or 3970x anyways
@CaptainScorpio24
3 жыл бұрын
I7 11700 non k
@gamingedition5165
3 жыл бұрын
i9 9900k overclocked vs the i9 11900k stock and oc.
@randomboi2595
3 жыл бұрын
9900k will win...
@volkangoktas9960
3 жыл бұрын
so pitty that theres no or minor improvement. i hope intel makes it again one day. i miss them
@harshlens
3 жыл бұрын
Do you have in 4k gaming?
@delivaresshurakato7097
Жыл бұрын
More cores, more threads, more clock, more cache *AND* less fps
@Simhero
3 жыл бұрын
this is honestly impressive, you get an FPS increase with 2 less cores on a new architecture
@simon3461
3 жыл бұрын
Intel destroys everything ! 20% higher IPC, cool, efficient and cheap ! People will buy this CPU like crazy - congratulations Intel. Now we all wait for the 10 core and 12 core parts...
@f-22raptor25
3 жыл бұрын
Cool efficient? Lol
@darkwolf1739
3 жыл бұрын
150w with peaks of 175? With some people getting peaks of over 190w lmao "efficent"
@f-22raptor25
3 жыл бұрын
@@darkwolf1739 actually the 11700k under full load peaks at 290w, with power limits off lol
@darkwolf1739
3 жыл бұрын
@@f-22raptor25 when you're cpu can take more power than most gpus and you still say its very efficient xD
@f-22raptor25
3 жыл бұрын
@@darkwolf1739 ik lol. intel fanboys are still in denial of ryzen being faster in games 4 months after the release of zen 3, on top of that still being faster than rocket lake.
@svaeon
3 жыл бұрын
For sure 11900 is better, why? 8 cores for same average fps compared to 10 cores. Worth to buy if u want a new PC. But if u got 10900k, stay calm. U'll be happy with the beast even in 5 years. That's the only good thing about 11900, if u do a new build worth to buy it.
@arturterestsenkov866
2 жыл бұрын
Hi, i have core i9 11900k, rog strix 3080 oc, asus rog strix z590-e gaming, 32gb ram, 850w gold and my fps in warzone in verdansk max-160/ min-110, can you ask why or do you have any ideas?
@knnym-5429
3 жыл бұрын
HI T-G. CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO WITH INTEL UHD 750 GRAPHICS? PLEASE
@monke2361
3 жыл бұрын
yeah im chillin with the 10900k
@atvkid0805
2 жыл бұрын
10850k much cheaper same performance.
@masatoindou1759
3 жыл бұрын
Haven't upgraded and am still on the i7-5820k.. so based on this would it be better to have 10 cores or 8 cores is essentially what it's come down to, this will be my first upgrade and my instinct says 11900k but after reading the comments now I'm not so sure what do you all think?
@xanbelor
2 жыл бұрын
I could’ve gotten either and I went with 10900k. Very happy with that, more future proof. You probably already decided but 10th gen definitely.
@easetepid4582
3 жыл бұрын
so what’s the conclusion? should I go for the 10900k or 11900k cause I’ve been thinking which one of those to get for my 3090.
@Rosiaczek
3 жыл бұрын
Go with 10900k, 5fps difference but 10 gen has 2 more cores and 4 more threads which is much better if you run something in bakcground
@easetepid4582
3 жыл бұрын
@@Rosiaczek alright, thanks man.
@farisalias1426
3 жыл бұрын
can u do i5-11400f vs i5-10400f
@babuji6148
3 жыл бұрын
Bro on side write in which setting you are playing
Пікірлер: 665