Correction: In the video I stated, "53.8 kWh, according to Anker SOLIX, is enough to fully power the average American home for around 2 weeks." Upon further research, most homes will require quite a bit more than this to FULLY backup their home for two weeks, but 53.8 kWh is still a lot of capacity and can still keep your important devices powered for an extended period of time.
@jtr82369
11 ай бұрын
Yes, I was going to comment on Anker's estimates. This product is amazing when used properly, run critical loads only and it's perfect.
@Cleanerwatt
11 ай бұрын
Great point @@jtr82369
@lpdirv
11 ай бұрын
Thats enough for two days for most homes. If you conserve then two weeks is possible but at what cost. I would suggest server rack batteries for larger storage.
@RWBHere
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the correction, Jon. I see that they plan to have a U.K. version too. That makes it even more interesting, especially seeing that it can be used off grid. Let's see how the prices pan out.
@WillProwse
11 ай бұрын
Test it!!!!
@SterFry528
10 ай бұрын
Have you tested this unit?
@WillProwse
10 ай бұрын
@@SterFry528 not yet haha don't have one
@SterFry528
10 ай бұрын
@@WillProwse dang. I really want to get your thoughts on this one. I’m looking for something like this to charge my Ford Lightning on long camping trips.
@MarkLLawrence
11 ай бұрын
Should replace "stinky" with "foul smelling" when you describe gas generators.
@Weslowski156788
8 ай бұрын
The UPS side of this if you keep a device plugged in all the time while charging the anker power. How many years would the anker last?
@dboucher26
10 ай бұрын
This unit sounds very impressive, until you compare it to other offerings out there. The cost per kWh, features, and value starts to diminish once you compare it to others, and I'm a huge fan of Anker, but money is scarce these days, and I can't maintain brand loyalty if it'll leave me dry on funds, sorry!
@AAa-qd8hb
8 ай бұрын
Too expensive with too many problems. Solar panels are only good in New Mexico type areas and need to be aimed correctly. How are you going to charge the batteries if the power grid is down? If these batteries are inside the unit and can not be replaced by the user after 6 years of usage that is very expensive.
@xdsone
8 ай бұрын
That's 6 years if used every day and that is only a reduction to 80% capacity so if you factor in that you only get about 80% of the 3.8kwh battery to begin with that's 3040kwh to begin with the if you used it to zero charge every day then in 6 years it would be about 2432kwh of battery power available.
@crazyhank99
11 ай бұрын
Is it just me, or does the delivery sound like a promo?
@Epicookiez
11 ай бұрын
it is
@mikus4242
11 ай бұрын
53KWh = 2 weeks? Not in Texas.....
@Cleanerwatt
11 ай бұрын
True - I pinned a comment with a correction on this statement.
@dboucher26
10 ай бұрын
Exactly, I live in TX and my 21kWh system is almost completely depleted after 12 hours of normal use.
@Evolution56
11 ай бұрын
This is nothing more than an advertisement unless you test it. Enjoy your content and watch everything but this was disappointing.
@retrogameai858
11 ай бұрын
How could this work in apartment buildings for those who rent
@johnpoldo8817
11 ай бұрын
Buyer beware, all battery backup units have a power limitation. This one is 3.8 kWh which means it will deliver 3.8 kW for one hour, then shut down. This is NOT a long time ! You can add more units for longer time, but it gets expensive. Conversely, if you only use half this power, you’ll get about 2 hrs. There are pros & cons to battery vs generator backup. If you require longevity, lower cost, and have an outdoor location, a generator is best, but beware of noise/odor. But in an apartment, condo, and many HOA’s, generators are not permitted so the Anker makes good sense.
@SirHackaL0t.
11 ай бұрын
Sadly we can’t buy it as this is just a fund raising advert. I so want one though.
@johnpoldo8817
11 ай бұрын
It’s an infomercial and nothing wrong about sharing it. If you want the item for power backup, buy it.
@SirHackaL0t.
11 ай бұрын
I think adverts like this should show how much you are being paid by the sponsor.
@CiaranMcHale
11 ай бұрын
The host clearly states (twice!) that the video is sponsored, thus complying with KZitem policies. Why do you think the host also needs to comply with an arbitrary "policy" from a random viewer? Are you so egotistical to think that your arbitrary view should take precedence over KZitem policies? Aside from that, a more practical question is what difference does it make to viewers whether the host was paid $0.10, $10 or $10,000 for making the video? We know he was paid *something,* and we can use that knowledge to listen to the video as a possibly biased advertisement rather than an unbiased, third-party review. So I don't think how much money he was paid is relevant.
@crazyhank99
11 ай бұрын
@@CiaranMcHale why be unpleasant about it? Clive Flint is stating a perfectly reasonable position. You might disagree but it doesn't seem like such a big deal that you need to be insulting.
@CiaranMcHale
11 ай бұрын
@@crazyhank99 I don't agree that Clive Flint's statement was "a perfectly reasonable position". I think what he said was very unreasonable. But since you seem to think what he said was reasonable, perhaps you could be good enough to explain *why* it is reasonable.
@crazyhank99
11 ай бұрын
@@CiaranMcHale if go you through the comments you can see many people thought this video was just an ad for this battery system. That's very different than a sponsored video in which the content is unrelated to the sponsored product. You can see many examples on the Two Bit DaVinci channel where the host devotes 1 or 2 minutes in the middle of a 10 or 15 minute episode and introduces that 1-2 minute ad segment by saying "and now lets talk about Surfshark" (or whatever the sponsor's product is), and then concludes the ad segment by saying "ok, let's return to topic X" that the video is about. I watch most of the most of Cleanerwatt's videos, but this one really was just an ad and I don't think that's right.
@CiaranMcHale
11 ай бұрын
@@crazyhank99 Your concern about this video is a reasonable one. I happen to partially disagree with it, but that doesn't make your comment any less reasonable. The important thing is that your comment is very unlike the comment made by Clive Flint. Clive did not say he disagrees with an advertisement-focussed video being on a channel. Rather, he imposed an obligation (via use of the word "should") on this channel's host. That obligation (to share financial details) is not one imposed by KZitem; rather, it is an *additional* obligation. Clive neglected to specify what, if any, position of authority he holds that grants him the right to impose additional obligations on the hosts of KZitem channels, and he also neglected to specify what benefit would come from the obligation. And, of course, since this channel's host has failed to meet Clive's obligation, Clive is, in essence, accusing the channel's host (in some vague, unspecified way) of behaving unethically. If Clive wants to make an accusation, then he should make the accusation clear and provide evidence to support it. Clive did neither. You thought my comment to Clive was rude. I was forcefully asking him to justify his baseless accusation. If you think me doing so was rude, then that's something we will have to agree to disagree on.
@TheStopwatchGod
10 ай бұрын
EcoFlow Delta Pro Ultra is better
@dboucher26
10 ай бұрын
I have the delta pros and I confirmed that I made the right choice after comparing it to this.
Пікірлер: 34