Nehru and his family has ruined India financially and strategically.. Worst Leader. Imagine what India would have been , if SVP was first PM.
@shanu7uday
3 жыл бұрын
... then new born India would have lost its first PM just 3 years after becoming free. Remember SVP was destined to die of heart attack in Dec1950 at the ripe age of 75 years. Then, Nehru would have become 2nd PM of India - from 1950 to 1964.
@agnimitra501
3 жыл бұрын
In my view gopalachari or ambedkar may have better first PM don't forget Sardar Patel was old and died in 1950 he was a visionary yes but as PM he may not have lasted long.
@ratankaramchandani329
3 жыл бұрын
India didn't walk away from Tibet but Nawab Nehru walked away.Those days Nehru acted as Nawab of India considered india as his kingdom of his father handed to him by M K Gandhi.He had all habits of Nawabs of pre independence era and was busy in those activities,hence had little time to look to national interests like J&K,ceding 35-50% of it to Pakistan,approaching UN unilaterally after ordering ceasefire despite resistance from Indian Army.Ceding 38000 square kilometres in Ladakh to china and not objecting to china annexation of Tibet.Nawab Nehru committed blunders India is paying dearly till date and how long we and our future generations will continue to pay only God knows.MKGandhi too has his share in this suffering of Indians by allowing Muslims to stay back in India despite giving these snakes separate country as per their demands.Both Nawab Nehru and MK Gandhi are architects of this position india is in
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
Afer WW2, it was Nehru & Mao who destroyed two great nations. Mao raised nationalism using the "Century of Humiliation" slogan and created loyal red army. The human wave attack has sacrificed the lives of millions of its youth in Korean war. The same wave attack failed miserably with Vietnam in 1979. In 1950, the first priority of Nehru was Korean war. Nehru acted as the mentor of Mao, justifying Tibetan aggression within India, in the congress party and at International stages exitdragon.blogspot.com
@VishalJoshi-sk8ll
3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately Nehru was India so India, U.S. & Nepal failed d Tibetans ...
@aravamudhanvijayaraghavan765
3 жыл бұрын
Ratan Karamchandani In those days foreign policy was only Nehru openion He never consultedwith knowledgible seniors ignored Patel and other seniors . Tha result of this was we lost our loss of Ladakh and Kashmir.
@ratankaramchandani329
3 жыл бұрын
Aravamudhan Vijayaraghavan absolutely correct sir he was like a Nawab answerable to nobody,arrogant,had all habits that Nawabs in earlier days had.In his Nawabi we lost Ladakh and Kashmir parts to china and Pakistan
@MsHollybible
3 жыл бұрын
India created by British colonist les than 200 years ago and believed itself should inherit all the colonies that British occupied and draw on the map. If Indian really care about ppl live along the Himalayas, then India should let Kashmir independent as buffer zone rather than invaded Skim causing more conflicts.
@upendrarao4021
3 жыл бұрын
Very informative. Finally the Indian establishment has come to realize the importance of Tibet. Hopefully this will be acted upon.Thanks a lot
@karthikpolasani3038
3 жыл бұрын
That time leadership under Nehru with blind perception even though Patel warned the same Chinese threat. India paying prices for Tibet and Kashmir blunders.
@tsedhonson
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your support Tibet 🙏
@PankajSachdeva
3 жыл бұрын
An ostrich mindset of 50s and 60s gave way to present situation.
@xmen8069
3 жыл бұрын
Weak coward Politician don't dare to even to China Occupied Tibet
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
exitdragon.blogspot.com
@PankajSachdeva
3 жыл бұрын
@Johney Smith It was an independent nation. But when it needed India's help, India walked away. Though the border might not be exactly defined in today's precise terms.
@PankajSachdeva
3 жыл бұрын
@Johney Smith Keep dreaming. You know nothing John Snow.
@alecmisra4964
3 жыл бұрын
@Johney Smith so you want these states and tibet to be independent?
@gurusastropalmistry2214
3 жыл бұрын
One china policy = One India policy (includes Entire JK, Pok, Gilgit Balitstan)
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
The One China Policy is fake. China is ruled by the Hans alone.
@MsHollybible
3 жыл бұрын
Mohan K obviously your Indian brain cannot handled the diversity in Chinese ethnic groups. Han ethnic is a culture symbol rather than genetic. Even two ppl claiming to be Han, they could have very much different phenotypes and family origins.
@globalcitizen6340
3 жыл бұрын
More I learn about the real history of India and Tibet, more I start feeling hatred and disgust for Nehru and his clan. They had ruined our civilization and heritage in addition to entire Indian history. I was already of firm belief about the deep interlinks between Indian and Tibet culture which I feel has been vindicated by this great author.
@globalcitizen6340
3 жыл бұрын
@Stephen Lee Occupier of Tibet, South Mongolia and East Turkmenistan. Brutal and illegal occupier talks about the level of prosperity. You guys have all come from outside. Nasty Hans Talk about GDP. Remember your bloody begging days just about 20-25 years back fooling the world. Now behaving as a typical nouveau riche. Ha ha ha! We are much better than you are and would definitely surpass your fake GDP soon. We would also like to have free Tibet soon. Wait for for a year or two. Then see where you arrogant Han would be soon.
@Parasuram5
3 жыл бұрын
Communism is a transient phenomenon. It thrives on hunger. Once people have their basic need communism time is up. So sometime in future China will break up and we will have a Tibet back as neighbors. Yes Nehru was a curse for not just India but Tibet
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
exitdragon.blogspot.com
@testuser8953
3 жыл бұрын
This channel needs more subscribers. Way underrated.
@18Ram
3 жыл бұрын
yes and this news channel below too kzitem.info/news/bejne/tKuvun6roZRhpJg
@tsedhonson
3 жыл бұрын
Agree 👍 👍 👍
@vishy89
3 жыл бұрын
Tough for India to recover Tibet. Congress and Nehru harmed India.
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
CCP uses PSYOPs to preserve the loyalty of Chinese people. Mao raised nationalism using the "Century of Humiliation" slogan and created loyal red army. The human wave attack has sacrificed the lives of millions of its youth in Korean war. The same wave attack failed miserably with Vietnam in 1979. Now many Chinese are rich, addicted to modern luxury life style. Pictures of graves of Chinese soldiers killed in Galwan clash are going viral on Chinese social media. exitdragon.blogspot.com
@merlingeikie
3 жыл бұрын
Yes India did walk away, left Tibet out to dry and allowed the genocide to begin. Hasn't stopped yet. Indira told UN 'No nothing happening in Tibet, all is good".
@aezakmi3766
3 жыл бұрын
India didnt , politicals leaders at that time did and those leaders didnt do well for india as well , also i dont think india was ready to face pakistan and china at same time , our country after independence was divided into two its military and its equipment was divided into two our equipment was old and also not well organised , also we had no allies at that time ,we were seen as communists due do our closeness with soviet union and hated by almighty usa and its allies .thats our part but worlds most powerfull nato and us didnt do anything as well.
@pravinutankar2107
3 жыл бұрын
Free Tibet 🙏 Jai Hind 👍
@abhisekhkumar4948
3 жыл бұрын
Can't watch, breaks my heart.
@gurdevbabbra6642
3 жыл бұрын
Grateful to Claude Arpi for clarity of the past historical events in the loss of Tibet to traitor China. I hope Arpi continue to disclose historical facts.
@sereneserene5267
3 жыл бұрын
His Holiness The Dalai Lama, himself is the witness of how he and his fellow Tibetans had suffered and gone through.
@tycoon1969
3 жыл бұрын
It's time India have a relook at its Tibet Factor and dump the One China policy. Using the SFF against China is a beginning
@harishrv6730
3 жыл бұрын
Indian mythology and epics clearly mention Himalayas as the abode of Lord Shiva and parvathi
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
All Hindus must unite, chase and drive the dragon away from Tibet and XinJiang and Yunan. exitdragon.blogspot.com
@karthikpolasani3038
3 жыл бұрын
@Johney Smith We never wanted entire Tibet in India part, we want Tibetans get independence . Except few parts are in India historical places like Kailash.
@karthikpolasani3038
3 жыл бұрын
@Johney Smith Yes I know am just interacting with Chinese bot.
@girasegina9725
3 жыл бұрын
@@karthikpolasani3038 Anyone who are against your claims are bots. Perfect logic.
@jimmy-j
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr. Claude Arpi for your precious research. Kindly feel free to start using stronger adjectives in your next interviews and books - for example “Indian foolishness about Tibet must rank among the most foolish decisions in the history of mankind”.
@carryon2197
3 жыл бұрын
Stratnews Global how do you manage to make such a gem of a show! I mean you have access to such scholarly experts who astonish us with their wisdom. Here is Mr Claude Arpi who is not an Indian & doesn't have to be biased towards India. Even so he exposes the duplicity of China while being blunt about Indias errors in Tibet policy. Mr Arpi has shared with us wealth of knowledge & history being neutral. He has shared insights which hardly any of us knew before. Clearly he lays out our failure in upholding our traditional relationship with Tibet. Begining rightly with the romantic notions of pacifism against a nation who asks what is nonviolence! It is saddening to know the facts about the colossal loss independent relations with Tibet. The ever expansionist CCP China will loose one day & democracy would be established.
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
Carry On /. In 1949 when People’s Republic of China’s was born, India was more rich and developed than China. Look at you now, China has a GDP 5 times bigger than India and has almost eradicated poverty in the country. China has an impressive 35.000 km of bullets trains, the biggest port and airports in the world. 160 millions people visit China every year and 140 millions Chinese travel abroad every year. China has it own GPS system called Beidou and countless technical and social advances. China was the first to be decimated by the coronavirus, but in less than two month could control it and resume its normal life. All that proves that other, than the multiparty systems, works and in fact are much more adapted to the traditions of the country and produce better results. Are you sure that the western “democracy “, which is not other than the “western hypocrisy”, is the best for India?
@carryon2197
3 жыл бұрын
@@navegantezen5983 I congratulate the progress & development of China. Indeed Democracratic nation is a happier place than autocratic systems. I have read about communist system of functioning. I had realised one thing, even a poor or corrupt or underdeveloped Democratic Nation is far better place to live freely. We are happy, express our views openly, free to pray to our God. Basically we are free to live our lives. I can choose to work like my liking. I can criticise my government. Basically I am a free & independent person. I love our Democracy any day even with its pitfalls.
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
Carry On Right, it’s your choice. But there are some problems in your analysis. 1) It’s seems that you never visited China yourself; 2) China changed its own communism orientation by socialist orientation after Mao’s death and it wasn’t just by chance; 3) China is in fact, a mixed economy: half capitalist and half public, whereas the capitalist part is the most dynamic in the world; 4) the socialist part take care more of what is strategic, like energy, public mega works (bridges, ports, aero ports, transport, etc), defense, infrastructure, health and education. 5) probably, you are comparing nowadays China with old communist countries that don’t even exist anymore, this not a good reference, in fact when people compare China they should compare her with Japan or with India which are in the area. Or with China before 1949, when 80% of people were illiterate and the average life expectancy was 44 years old and now is 77 years old; 6) finally I would say that if you inform yourself through anti-China media, you will have a completely distorted idea of the real fact. I’m not chinese, but I travel often to China for business and I’m not communist at all. I have made friends in China and they express theirs opinion without constraints and through public media as well. There are the equivalents of US like Facebook, WhatsApp Twitter and Instagram and they are use by millions of people expressing themselves.
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
Varun Shekhar Are you sure the people in invaded Kashmir by Indian troops share your point of view?
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
zhuge Liang Thank you, very interesting.
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this nice discussion with well learned scholar on Tibet. The Govt. of India under Nehru was technically a care-taker Govt as representative Govt. was established only after 1st Lok Sabha elections in 1952. As per Constitution collective decisions had to be taken by the Council of Ministers (there was no Cabinet in Constitution then) but Nehru took unilateral decisions both during care taker period & after 1952. Nehru also held Foreign Minister post till his death in 1964 to keep imp people out. Many of his decisions were never brought to the notice of parliament. As a result, Nehru had done monumental follies & serious errors of judgment for which we are still paying the price : (1) Dictatorial Nehru did not heeding his deputy PM Sardar Patel’s advice (a) to retain bulk of battle-hardened Indian soldiers returning from WW 2 considering Chinese designs on Tibet & (b) to sanctify Tibet-British India border treaties before accepting Tibet as part of China & keep Indian troops inside Tibet as per agreements with Govt of Tibet. (Letter of Patel to Nehru in “The Henderson-Brooks/Bhagat Report of the 1962” quoted by Neville Maxwell). ( 2) Nehru did not retain most of WW2 battle-hardened Indian troops on one pretext or another. Soldiers of Bose’s INA were not taken as they had fought British-India troops, Soldiers of Princely States were denied as these states were deemed British puppets & had disallowed Congress’ freedom struggle within their territory, Soldiers who had surrendered to Japanese in Singapore were refused as PoWs are not entitled to be taken back. Of the 2.5 million Indian troops in WW2 only 3,50.000 were retained. This despite 1947-Paki attack on Kashmir! (3) Kashmir : Nehru went to the UNSC without consulting his ministerial colleagues. (4) Nehru used dictatorial method to incorporate Article 370 into Indian Constitution even against the wishes of BR Ambedkar who tactfully made this article temporary. (5) Nehru stealthily added Article 35A in constitution in 1954 by presidential notification without discussion in Parliament. (6) Tibet : There was agreements that defense of Tibet was to be supported by Indian Army & India had agreement of security of Chumbi Valley (site of 2017-Doklam) till 1979 for which funding was done by Govt of Tibet. The Shimla Treaty was signed in July 1914 by representatives of India and Tibet defining relationships and the borders between two sovereign countries at Aksai Chin following which India maintained diplomatic missions in Lhasa and Gyangtse while Tibet’s transactions with the outside world were conducted mainly through India. Nehru allowed just 3 divisions of Mao’s untrained peasant army to kill & maim over 1 million Tibetans in 1950 & refused to intervene let alone condemn the genocide. He was rewarded for his benevolence by the Chinese in 1962.
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
@Lady Anon The truth is that India was weak then so China easy to over Tibet other wise India would have helped Tibet be a independent country as Mongolia is today . The Soviets helped Mongolia from not getting invaded by China today Mongolia is a independent nation between Russia and China . The Russia's were strong then so they help Outer Mongolia gain its freedom while we Indians we were weak nation so we didn't or say couldn't help Tibet but betrayed Tibet and sold it to China to you can see we are suffering and facing the consequences of our mistakes of our previous leaders . Tibet would have been a direct buffer between India and China just like Mongolia is between Russia and China .
@nagbalkur1365
3 жыл бұрын
Nehru failed policies despite Sardar Patel's warnings led to loss of tibet, Aksai Chin and loss of 40000 sq km of land
@jeetendrajagwani
3 жыл бұрын
Amazing insightful observations from Claude Arpi!
@Hayat208
3 жыл бұрын
Please give English subtitles to follow the conversation.
@Hayat208
3 жыл бұрын
@john doe Thanks for your advice. I found the transcript but not the auto translate.
@Hayat208
3 жыл бұрын
@john doe Got it. CC is working. Thanks again.
@OneWorldView
3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful insight..such expertise should be included by strategic committee on Tibet policy. Wonder we have even instituted such a group and committee.
@kumarkr3599
3 жыл бұрын
Really informative and down to earth discussion. Thank u
@swapnilkapadia
3 жыл бұрын
Great insight of the history.
@amitwaugh
3 жыл бұрын
Very good interview and points put by the guest. Appreciate his candid suggestions. Hope Narendra Modi and respective stake holder are hearing this interview.
@vschallasastry3586
3 жыл бұрын
Dear Gangadharan Garu When we get to know the errors of Jawaharlal Nehru, first impression was an error!! But when we look at all his errors, we get a doubt whether these are willing errors especially limiting the Hindus rights and supporting Muslims. In north lost border and Manassarovar which is heart of Hindu religion! As regards Kashmir abosolute injustice to Hindus! Now it has become a big blunder! His daughter made india secular where as all other religious people inspite of all misbehaviour they are right, only Hindus are wrong His grand son was so happy when Hindus are kicked out of Kashmir happily sleeping as if it won’t worry him. All these events can not be called errors, there seems to be an anti Hindu agenda in Nehru family blood, what a tragedy!!!! His wife is clinging to party politics like bat and became most corrupt person in india!!!! Now she wants her dumb son to be prime minister!!! What grate first family Jai hind Bharat Mata ki Jai Dr cvsastry
@Tintin-gv9ir
3 жыл бұрын
We made a big mistake of turning a blind eye to Chinese occupation of Tibet . We let down our Tibetan brothers and sisters and now we suffer too . This is karma . It’s not too late to reverse our mistakes . End one China policy . Aim for freedom for Tibet . And am important aim for QUAD . USA wants an alliance and give them one with our aim on table : free Tibet , all Kashmir back into India
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
Military pre-emption is also defense strategy. China survives on Psychological tactic of Acharya Sun Tzu. Just attack, the Chinis will run away. Just declare a war, then the Money Lenders will negotiate for a peaceful settlement. Mao says - When the enemy advances, we retreat; when the enemy camps, we harass; when the enemy tires, we attack; when the enemy retreats, we pursue. exitdragon.blogspot.com
@sarthakasthana2464
3 жыл бұрын
For those blaming India it was Chacha Nehru who made the blunder by supplying Chinese army with food in 53 for capturing tibet, then it never believed China will go against India, he was dumb, after 62 war CIA and RAW of India came together but USA then left the support and help in Independent Tibet cause to focuse more on USSR primarily after Sino Soviet split. While USA left the fight for helping Tibet and Nehru was dumb and idiot, Indian Army and RAW maintained special Tibetian forces like SFF and Establishment 22. USA is to be greatly greatly blamed for this blunder too.
@sbs5408
3 жыл бұрын
India should strongly take up Tibet independence and Baloch Freedom in UNGA. Take the battle to their homes.
@nirmal3028
3 жыл бұрын
Blood boils when we hear the historical connection between India and Tibet from ancient times, how can India give Tibet and now China want more land of India, just basic knowledge, A slkh who visited Tibet in 1900 to 1922 Sadhu Sunder Singh writes that no border between India and Tibet, Sadhu Sunder Singh always use to go Mount Kailash to visit 300yrs Maharishi , he tells the names of all lamas correctly in his book, one beauty, I found the Sikh, Pundits and Tibetan living in close hormony without problem, I really dont know on what basis China claimed Tibet. Particularly see the Tebitan Language, its similar to north east and Tibetan can also learn Hindi easily due to historical link. Only Mongol king conquered Tibet for brief period, China don't have any connection. India must take back Tibet and protect and Train Tibetan until Tibetan can manage independently🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
@pulakitsingh8024
3 жыл бұрын
This is such a valuable and insightful conversation! Kudos!
@javedsiddique2012
3 жыл бұрын
It's a public forum, everyone is entitled to his views, encourage people to Express, instead of suppressing.
@jamesjc
3 жыл бұрын
Monsieur Arpi offers the proper roadmap for Indian leadership - how the grave Tibet mistake India committed can be corrected.
@thavarajsubramaniam6772
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for bringing Tibet on the World agenda
@debashismukherjee795
3 жыл бұрын
An excellent account of the real history around India Tibet affair. It'll be good to know the titles of the books, if they're in English. Best wishes to the author for the completion of his current book.
@misterbean5308
3 жыл бұрын
india now is paying for letting down tibet...
@alvinit6821
3 жыл бұрын
Thank You for the video.
@IndroneelMukerji
3 жыл бұрын
Please have more interactions with Monsieur Arpi : he can show our spineless foreign policy blunders of the past, like a mirror in front of our eyes.
@gauravgarg5784
3 жыл бұрын
#FreeTibit
@dalipbirsanta7352
3 жыл бұрын
Good knowledge this guest...
@ON-tk7bp
3 жыл бұрын
Nehru and Congress failed. He tried to hold morals but was not a good strategists and was surrounded by yes men. India failed, and has done so regularly. Look at the Shimla agreement - wonderful piece of paper, sympathy from Indira Gandhi but it has not helped India. Now lets learn from history and ensure that China's hunger is managed effectively and appropriately. A good analysis and interview.
@tenchange6269
3 жыл бұрын
India has to understand that China would like to isolate India from becoming a super power as only India matches China in population and land mass. Other countries like Japan and South Korea etc are small countries in terms of population and land mass. Also those countries enjoy NATO allies treaty and have USA as a back up. China will not dare attack those countries or create problems. India under no alignment movement didn’t join any faction and has been paying that price. China by indirectly providing Pakistan arms and ammunition has been keeping India busy in wars and unrest while China has been progressing economically. India needs to change its mentality thinking that winning from Pakistan is enough. Pakistan is half the size of India. India could win Pakistan in a few day’s if it goes to full scale war. India must compete with China to become a super power and not restrict itself to smaller country level like Pakistan, nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh etc. India should start taking steps like a super power mentality.
@harishreddygummi764
3 жыл бұрын
Nehru and his incompetence is the reason why Tibet and India are facing border issues today.
@srinivasangopalan3145
3 жыл бұрын
Whereas China was totally unreasonable with India why should not India go aggressive and go hard and beat China?
@djsunshine1
3 жыл бұрын
Great conversation
@kiransahni100
3 жыл бұрын
Good analysis
@vp4439
3 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT analogy
@harishrv6730
3 жыл бұрын
Give respect to get respect should be the rule of India w.r.t China.
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
China showed respect, with Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai song by Chou En Lai.
@ashokkaul3165
3 жыл бұрын
It is a pity that the audio- visuals of this program - primarily the former - render these otherwise intelligent discussions largely unintelligible.
@kumudroy7322
3 жыл бұрын
It is Nehru who messed up the Tibet issue. Indians are Tibet's friend. Indians want to see free Tibet.
@vinodkumar-ee9kz
3 жыл бұрын
This is the right time for India to recognise Tibetan govt in exile. His holiness Dalai Lama should also appoint his successor or centuries old tradition will be lost for ever.
@madhureddy7643
3 жыл бұрын
This is a response to a friend who sent this youtube video. Betrayal is a very strong word without taking in to account the circumstances of the time. India and China both got independence around same time, one with non-violence, another with revolution. Both were heavily populated, illiterate and very low per capita income. Nehru opted democracy, individual rights and want to develop India through Socialist policies. China opted Communism, dictatorial rule and no individual rights. India has to deal with partition and the problems associated with the division of the country including Kashmir. After World War II, the cold war erupted between Soviet Union and USA, and Nehru was forced to take sides. Nehru navigated under those circumstances and tried his best. Earlier I said judging Nehru like Monday morning quarterback is unfair. When Nehru became the PM, India was not manufacturing aspirin nor a needle. He has to improve the education, healthcare and employment to 32 Crore people. Nehru genuinely thought both India and China are old civilisations, heavily populated and poor, and agreed to sign puncha sheel to coexist and support each other. It is China who betrayed India time after time to this day. You can blame Nehru for trusting China, but calling Nehru a betrayer is unwise. China from the begining has expansionist goals because of Communist dictatorship. Crores of people died in China with starvation, no one there to ask because of a closed society. Nehru could not do such thing because India was an open society and Indian Communists were eager to support China to this day. Basically Nehru hands were tied, and now blaming Nehru for everything is wrong. Nehru died 56 years ago, subsequently many people governed India, including BJP Vajpayee. They could have alter the policy. Can you blame other leaders too also betrayed because they too failed? Because of Nehru’s vision, today we are still a democracy. He build the institutions that emerged India as the 4th biggest economy. Now, our leaders can change the policy without blaming the past. Instead what is happening in India is the Hindutva(RSS) forces want to polarise the people based on religion and stay in power and impose Brahminical values. Their goal is to demonise Nehru and his accomplishments. Can you blame Nehru keeping India as a Secular country? Because of him, Kashmir is still part of India. Many things happened in India after Nehru such as Votebank politics, population explosion, high unemployment. Because of high unemployment, Saudi petro dollars helped to establish thousands of Madrases in India to brain wash the poor Muslim youth. It helped the RSS to consolidate the power among the Hindu Indians exploiting the Muslim fear. India can revamp their national policies without criticising Nehru and come up with policies to reduce the population and unemployment. China took advantage of Globalisation and emerged as the second biggest economic power of the world, and their per capita income is three times higher than India. If Tibetans want to fight for their freedom, India should train them and help them. RSS can’t divide the society based on religion and able to stand against the most powerful China. In my humble opinion, there is no modern India without the Nehru’s vision! Regards, Madhu K. Reddy
@drsiddharthadas2698
3 жыл бұрын
INDIA is so close to Tibet as UP is to DELHI ,Besides there was close cultural
@alfa_romeo0701
3 жыл бұрын
What stupid choices did we make after independence. He is right by saying we were romantic
@malcolmwar977
3 жыл бұрын
During that time, Mao got a larger than life image, for most Asians, due to his success in Korea. They saw how he manhandled the colonial powers there.
@captainnemo8072
3 жыл бұрын
Good man.
@emmawang1999
3 жыл бұрын
China liberated Tibetans from slavery, while India embraced the Dalai Lama, the largest salve owner of the world. China provides free health care to all Tibetans, build new houses for Tibetans. Each year the Chinese central government subsidize the Tibetan local government10 billion dollars for the general welfare of Tibet. Can India do any of these?
@kunalseth6437
3 жыл бұрын
Well done, more Tibet discussions please. One of the reasons I will never support congress.
@shanu7uday
3 жыл бұрын
WHOLE WORLD including USA gifted Tibbat to Cheen back in 1959. Poverty stricken India whose literacy rate back then was under 30% had ABSOLUTELY no ability , nor logistics to send its ill equipped army to Lhasa to fight the cruel bloodthirsty PLA. Even today the superb Indian army can’t even dream of reaching Lhasa in case of a war!
@praveenkumar-pv1ne
3 жыл бұрын
Coz of DMK advertising how many of you skipped the video.. I did
@dayanand570
3 жыл бұрын
India walked away from Tibet and will honor all it's promises and agreements with other countries but not at the cost of its sovereignty.If other countries act against India's interest then India can change its policies whether it is PoK GB .Tibet,Taiwan or any other issues.
@dayanand570
3 жыл бұрын
@Chirag K Mr.Chirag, Late P M Vajpayee walked away from Tibet and then whether we like it or not Late PM Narasimha Rao agreed for the present LAC and signed an agreement. And if China unilaterally violates that agreement then India can change it policies on Tibet.But there is no harm in talking .But if talks fail then India has an option to change its policies which suits our national interest and which is defendable in international forum.
@shashanksri5993
3 жыл бұрын
The only option we have is to wait for the next cycle in Chinese history
@monarai5110
3 жыл бұрын
Impressive articulation
@gauravgarg5784
3 жыл бұрын
Was Nahru the dumbest leader ever?
@rajbodepudi
3 жыл бұрын
Free Tibet!
@sunderasr
3 жыл бұрын
A very informative discussion shows how Nehru's India Betrayed and back stabbed Friend Tibet.Today India is reaping what it had sown in the 1950s.Karma has come full circle..to Haunt India..
@Fjwizn
3 жыл бұрын
THAT WILL RESTORE INDIAN HONOUR!! NOT THE RSS STICK FIGHTERS AND THE GAU RAKSHAKS.....INDIAN ARMY GO AND TAKE BACK ASKAI CHIN , THEN POK RIGHT UP TO THE KHUJERAB PASS !!
@maheshsunderaraman7043
3 жыл бұрын
As a common Indian citizen I declare that Nehru was a traitor and that the agreements like Panchsheel etc are Null and Void. We have to go back to pre 1950 era without any agreements. Cannot digest all of this. An act of treachery cannot be binding on future free citizens of India. I am sure all will be ready to sign a petition on this if required.
@ravinderpalsingh4225
3 жыл бұрын
Indian leaders evidently have not only a poor sense of history, but a desire to have a monopoly of negotiations without any ground or military knowledge which has led the Chinese to take more than they have given away. Panch sheel and recognition of Tibet as part of China without any reciprocal advantages shows our attitude of appeasement of those we consider more powerful. All agreemrnts made since 1993 shows how the Chinese have side stepped the main question of demarcation and turned our military patrols in to a group for waving banners. As Claude Arpi says the Corps Commabder leading the negotiations has deep knowledge of Tibet and understanding of ground. He should also be part of the Foreign Minister's negotiating team, which is filled up by diplomats who little knowkedge of security realities.
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
First of all the Sino-Indian border does not exist. Nehru gifted Tibet to China on a golden platter. He justified the Chinese aggression within India as well as in international stages. Nehru yelled at the new Dalai Lama, upon being told that Tibet must have independence. "That is not possible!", Nehru exploded, "You say you want independence and in the same breath you say you do not want bloodshed. Impossible!" At first glance a hypocritical outburst from a man who had been with MK Gandhi led India to independence through non-violent means exitdragon.blogspot.com
@Fjwizn
3 жыл бұрын
INDIA HAS ALREADY GIVEN UP ON ASKAI CHIN SO WHAT IS THE INDIAN ARMY FIGHTING FOR ???? AN IMAGINARY LINE ??? THEY FIRST NEED TO TAKE BACK ASKAI CHIN AND THEN TALK THE TALL TALK OF LIBERATING TIBET!!
@umeshdesh
3 жыл бұрын
How should we liberate Tibet from China. Big mistakes by Nehru by accepting Tibet control by Chinese
@hemant12121955
3 жыл бұрын
It happened only due to wrong and foolish policy of Nehru. He didn't estimate the strategic value of Tibet not only in respect of land but water and old silk route.
@pritidodhia5059
3 жыл бұрын
Indian leadership was the weakest of that time. Either they were scared of Chinese or not prepared militarily nor the Babus of that time specially Nehru. Somebody else’s region was handed over just like that. Listen to this author what he says. Truthfulness. Stubbornness of Nehru and dictatorial mentality and other parliamentary voices were silenced. Army was not allowed anything. Congress Babus have ruined the country.
@vallisubrama
3 жыл бұрын
One thing is clear - congress had no idea of governance.
@meetaivirupakshayya7220
3 жыл бұрын
Mr.Surya gandaran it's murrkee on nheru, his personal interest leave Tibet.to China,is became therrt to India for that nation never excuse.
@Fjwizn
3 жыл бұрын
CLAUD IS 100% CORRECT THE CHINESE USE LANGUAGE AS THE FIRST LINE OF ENCRYPTION!! AS THE AMERICANS LEARNT HARD WAY IN THE KOREAN TALKS ! THE CHINESE NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY !!! SO THE INDIAN ARMY AND MEA NEEDS CHINESE SPEAKING OFFICERS!! AS THE AMERICANS SAY DONT GO BY WHAT THE CHINESE SAY BUT BY WHAT THEY DO !!
@abhisekhkumar4948
3 жыл бұрын
Very sad..
@a.nagarajrao8525
3 жыл бұрын
It is not too late to realise the mistake/ Himalyan blunder even now but act effectivlely so as to set right the wrong doings of the past by all means.Only then neighbourhood of SE Asian countries can prosper independantly.
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
Save Himalayan waters for SE Asia. Liberate Tibet, XinJiang, Baloch, Sind, Yunan and Inner Mongolia exitdragon.blogspot.com
@Hayat208
3 жыл бұрын
No use to cry over spilled milk and the blunders of Nehru and Menon despite of Sardar Patel's foresight and warnings. Let's try to correct the situation and get Tibet its independence and role as a friendly buffer state between India and China.
@petagonkyi
3 жыл бұрын
Don't blame Nehru alone. Vajpayee made the same mistake so did Modi in 2018. Every Indian Neta/PM since Nehru with the exception of Lal Bahadur Shastri.
@myoracleguideutube
3 жыл бұрын
@@petagonkyi Nehru closed the file with Panchasheel in 1954. Revoking the Article 370 is a good step. Next, Liberate Tibet, XinJiang, Baloch, Sind, Yunan and Inner Mongolia exitdragon.blogspot.com
@edwardtang1977
3 жыл бұрын
Tibet was never part of India. Try having toilets first. 🤣
@Dekanalini
3 жыл бұрын
Terrible Political mistakes were made by Pandit Nehru! An idealist, a wooly headed Anglophile, with leftist views, Proud of his brahminical Kashmiri Ancestry. His family moved away from Kashmir and adopted Allahabad. Mahatma Gandhi was impressed by his capacity to address the congress party, whereas Gandhi was a poor speaker. Gandhi Ji impressed the poor masses and assuaged their religious emotions with his prayer meetings. His capacity to take Self punishment was impressive and made him a Pir for the ordinary Muslims as well. He too was fooled by Jinnah. Nehru was fooled by Sheikh Abdullah, and knew not how to engage the Chinese. An imperial power experimenting with communist ideology. There was no comprehension of the Chinese Psyche. I remember reading of Dr. kotnis when I was 12, that informed me somewhat about the condition of the Chinese poor. The trading between Hindustan and China. The common man spoke different dialects while Mandarin was an imperial language.The Xenophobia of Hindus is remarkable, there was Little attempt to understand their neighbour, who were the Melechas, animal eating insect and snake eating people lacking in fine sensitivities. Still no attempt at understanding their Psyche. No Chinese speaking Sociologists or Psychologists around. No attempt to create a behavioural unit that understands the psycho-social product that is the member of the PLA. and the member of the Ruling party. How stupid we are! So many Chinese know our Languages, Marathi, Telugu Tamil and Hindi. How many of us learn Cantonese, or Mongolian or Tibetan. Don’t try to reassure yourself with the same rhetoric. The Chinese are clever, innovative, hard working people, who can manage with minimum comforts.
@venkatasrinivas4485
3 жыл бұрын
May Be We Lost Trust Too..But The Point Is What We Can Do Now.. Losing A Peaceful Neighbour & Culture That Belonging To Us ..
@xmen8069
3 жыл бұрын
We should Awake Coward Politician to call Tibet Independent Country Officially
@javedsiddique2012
3 жыл бұрын
India was never a United country, even north and south were different regions and states,
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
Even China was also not a united country for a long time it was also divided up by different kingdoms like Tibet and East Turkestan and United Mongolia (Comprising North Mongolia or the So called outer country of Mongolia today and inner Mongolia which is part of China today . ) even Manchuria was quite independent for a while it was only when the Qing dynasty in power which ruled China and they were the one which united China which we can see as today . (Forcefully annexing those regions today and the CCP considers its self as the successor of the Qing empire but then why don't they occupy North Mongolia which is a country today because Mongolia was also part of Qing dynasty ) Unlike China which wants to be a Expansionist even in this 21 century they want land and more land and they want to take other regions which it thinks it has historical connections with but they left Mongolia to be independent and Tuva and North (Outer) Manchuria was give to Russia by China .
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
Thats why you can see so many historical separatist movements in China like Tibet or xinjiang or inner Mongolia , etc and so much resistance against HAN Chinese CCP rule in those regions .
@javedsiddique2012
3 жыл бұрын
@@MM-br3gt Hans are more than 91% of Chinese population, and it is only logical that there is resentment against them.
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
@@javedsiddique2012 Their is a resentment between the ethnic minorities and the majority Han Chinese and the dominant CCP Han Chinese majority government .
@abhinav.mishra17
3 жыл бұрын
We don't have to worry about Tibet or anything else. Our politicians and especially this government is ruining us in every possible way. Everything will be sold in coming decade and India will again be a colony of different powers and corporations.
@javedsiddique2012
3 жыл бұрын
Historically India was never been a single country, except in Ashoka, s time and under Mughals and British, even in those time there were 600 smaller states with autonomous and semi autonomous status.
@ratankaramchandani329
3 жыл бұрын
India was one country or else why was it called Bharat thousands of years ago while other civilisation were not there.You may be short on facts and repeating sentences uttered by Saif Ali Khan.Go to history and satisfy ur self.United states of America is conglomerate of states.Check ur facts before commenting on India and its history because you are too new in it
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
Keep dreaming. That’s Indians do the best.
@aprofromuk
3 жыл бұрын
yes only 10 years left before disintegrating into tibet, south mongolia, xinjiang, taiwan, hk .... :)
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
aprofromuk You see? Keep dreaming. And better mind your own business, you have a lot of problems now that will not be resolved thinking on China.
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
Varun Shekhar I see how paranoia looks like. I hope China will decouple 100% from India to see how good you will do. Anyway, for China it represent just 3% of her international trade.
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
The truth is that India was weak then so China easy to over Tibet other wise India would have helped Tibet be a independent country as Mongolia is today . The Soviets helped Mongolia from not getting invaded by China today Mongolia is a independent nation between Russia and China . The Russia's were strong then so they help Outer Mongolia gain its freedom while we Indians we were weak nation so we didn't or say couldn't help Tibet but betrayed Tibet and sold it to China to you can see we are suffering and facing the consequences of our mistakes of our previous leaders . Tibet would have been a direct buffer between India and China just like Mongolia is between Russia and China .
@navegantezen5983
3 жыл бұрын
The Infinite Lord You have no idea about what are you taking about. A little read of history would help you. Stop guessing. You are describing the world as a blind would do it. Anyway, Sanskrit and Tibetan is not the same language. In India just 3% of the population is Buddhist in contrast with 18% in China. What you mostly are is Hindu a religion that Buddha revolt himself. Hindu is a cast fascist religion and that’s what you really are.
@javedsiddique2012
3 жыл бұрын
Indian fault lines are varied and distinct, only way it can survive as a United country, is firm believe and practice of democracy, more power to provinces, and non interference in people's religion and faith. Secularism ......
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
The truth is that India was weak then so China easily took over Tibet other wise India would have helped Tibet be a independent country as Mongolia is today . The Soviets helped Mongolia from not getting invaded by China today Mongolia is a independent nation between Russia and China . The Russia's were strong then so they help Outer Mongolia gain its freedom while we Indians we were weak nation so we didn't or say couldn't help Tibet but betrayed Tibet and sold it to China to you can see we are suffering and facing the consequences of our mistakes of our previous leaders . Tibet would have been a direct buffer between India and China just like Mongolia is between Russia and China .
@MM-br3gt
3 жыл бұрын
China was also not a united country for a long time it was also divided up by different kingdoms like Tibet and East Turkestan and United Mongolia (Comprising North Mongolia or the So called outer country of Mongolia today and inner Mongolia which is part of China today . ) even Manchuria was quite independent for a while it was only when the Qing dynasty in power which ruled China and they were the one which united China which we can see as today . (Forcefully annexing those regions today and the CCP considers its self as the successor of the Qing but then why don't they occupy North Mongolia which is a country today because Mongolia was also part of Qing dynasty ) Unlike China which wants to be a Expansionist even in this 21 century they want land and more land and they want to take other regions which it thinks it has historical connections with but they left Mongolia to be independent and Tuva and North (Outer) Manchuria was give to Russia by China .
Пікірлер: 236