Austrian stock living in Africa sending blessings to my cousins in the subcontinent, you guys are beautiful, make the best damn food in the world and are too good at dancing.
@AtheistNationalist
Ай бұрын
Thanks bro 🫡
@smitprmr
Ай бұрын
Thank you kindly.
@jmab721
Ай бұрын
Thank you, please ignore the triggered comments by our right wing fanatics. They don't represent all subcontinent, they're a bunch of radicals with free internet & lot of unemployment.
@lschandankumar3661
2 күн бұрын
Thank you brother
@simongee8928
Ай бұрын
Same as Africa. Many folk see it as a country. It's actually a continent of 52 separate countries with many diverse peoples and traditions. 😊
@Bavahar
6 күн бұрын
A new dicovery that bhim kand in madhyapradesh, India... Ancient paintimg rocks first human times more than 30,000years ago....
@chetangawade5002
Ай бұрын
DNA test in USA Christian Missionery Church ✝️🤣🤣😄. And Report print in British Court 🤣😄🙊
@bigboss.800
Ай бұрын
😂
@rravisankar3355
Ай бұрын
When there's never a race called Aryan in reality ever existed what's point of all these concoction!
@ralph6417
Ай бұрын
Lol
@Gogetter-xc9ob
23 күн бұрын
Yk truth always tastes the worst 😂
@gerardmichaelburnsjr.
21 сағат бұрын
Cyrus the Great, in effect the founder of the Persian empire, said he and his people were Aryans. The word 'Iran', means 'Aryan' in Farsi. The Medes, who dominated what is now Iran before the Persians, said.the Persians were Invaders from the north, the Uman Mazda, or at least related to them, and could speak with each other without interpreters. So, Aryan may not qualify as a 'race', which is a hard to define term, but they were evidently a large culturally and linguistically defined people at one time.
@user-jt3dw6vv4x
Ай бұрын
The founder population in China was not overwhelmed though, they continue to persist in China and gave rise to all modern eastern Chinese populations. Eastern Chinese are still 100% of East Eurasian origin having descended from various ESEA lineages, while Indians are on average 30-45% East Eurasian, having partially descended from the related AASI lineage.
@MyTubeOne
5 күн бұрын
Great content and interesting information
@AndyFurze
5 ай бұрын
As someone who has romani ancestry on my mother's side i came back on a dna test as 7% indian continent,so this was very interesting and informative
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
Romanis are not homogenous like they were initially when they left India now they are mixed and have different sub groups around the world.
@gerardmichaelburnsjr.
21 сағат бұрын
I may be misremembering this, but my understanding is there's a small group in Afghanistan that speaks a language so close to Romani that it is believed to be the original homeland. Similarly, Basque also seems to have had its origin there, or at least to I have a sister-language there.
@AndyFurze
20 сағат бұрын
@@gerardmichaelburnsjr.the romani their language is very similar to the language in what is north Western India for some reason and nobody hasn't come up with any correct idea why they really left.that they travelled through Persia.the middle east .north Africa. the balkans.greece.spain.eastern Europe. Western Europe eventually Britain and Ireland slowly intermixing as they travelled west.i look English but my mum's grandmother did look romani and my two uncle's black hair brown eyes and olive skins.in the mid victorian times romani were put under alot of pressure to settle down in one place for school and the census that is how my mum's romani side got settled.i looked it up on the 10 year census and they seemed to appear from nowhere in th 1860's
@AndyFurze
19 сағат бұрын
@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. the people who are called romani left North western India probably a 1000s years ago travelled through Persian.middle east.north Africa.the balkans.greece.easten Europe. Spain and then western Europe and then Britain and Ireland all the time slowly mixing with the local people along the way.i look English my mum's grandmother does look Romani black hair dark skin both my mum's brothers had black hair brown eyes and olive skin.ive only have to be out in the sun a little bit and o tan very brown
@Dan-xx5jq
Ай бұрын
Some will hate me for this but i believe that India is the cradle of mankind. India is where mankind first came about for reasons below which make total sense!! If you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over heat like a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot, when ancient natives of India moved to Africa and the equator they eventually became darker skinned and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. (The opposite is true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, the ancient native of India that moved there, had to retain body heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose that heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that was in the news, that has albinism and had blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And i believe Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete and total sense that all different races that have come about in the world would come from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have their hair straighten up....!! There would be no environmental factors to cause the hair to straighten up! i expect to get a lot of hate but like has happened before, the scientific community will figure out they got it all wrong when skeletons of ancient people are found in India and the world.
@mohamedgoldstein5565
Ай бұрын
Wow. Thats madrassa level science!
@Just_forfun9140
Ай бұрын
You have an interesting theory. Something happened in India, its like the tower of babel for languages, it could be the land of origin of many races or a precursor. They need to find many ancient skeletons from 5,10,15, 20K years ago from various regions of India, then we get a better picture. Its possible from India people migrated to various regions, after thousands of years the descendents migrated back to India? Who knows, so far no one knows 100% for sure.
@Just_forfun9140
Ай бұрын
I saw the YT video of a Albino woman in India, she looks like a northern European woman, not even from southern Europe. Indians who lose their pigment due to autoimmune condition, they also look European.
@user-zq5dh6jr8n
Ай бұрын
bro wasted 1200 words
@globanxiety
Ай бұрын
@@Just_forfun9140 The oldest skeletons found in india are from river narmada, dates back 140000 years. they're also the oldest pre-neolithic remains we have in the world. there's a video on YT about this recent discovery
@gramki973
Ай бұрын
The vedas and all languages including sanskrit were developed by indegenous people.Continet of europe is temperate and till 18th century bathig was a luxury whiek indus valley was civikized with well laid places for bath and drains etc.The civilization was indegenous ,migrants and invaders might have happened as India is warm and had fertile lands.
@jonswap9097
Ай бұрын
Unfortunately the DNA claims given here about skeletons fron the Indus Valley Civilization are factually incorrect. Only one skeleton provided enough DNA to provide a genetic analysis, and the closest match was to Ancestral South Indian DNA. In addition, an extensive analysis of modern DNA in India showed the whole of the Indian population to be much more closely related to each other than populations outside India, and a gradual variation in for example Iranian farmer/Yamna DNA North to South and Tibeto-Burmese DNA North East to South. This is evidence of a mingled Indian population with a slow and steady influx of external DNA from trade and peaceful migration than a significant influx due to invasion and displacement of the native population. The complete absense of Yamna DNA is not stastically significant in a sample size of one, particularly if the two populations were separate cultures which coexisted in the same area in different settlements as in the Oxus Valley Civilization. What this means is that the Yamna DNA was also present in India at the same time as the Ancestral South Indian DNA prior to the Indus Valley Civilization. There is also a Dravidian language called Brahui which is spoken to the present day Pakistan to this day, close to where the ancient Indus Valley cities in Pakistan were. It should also be noted that the Yamna culture and Indus Valley Civilization cultures were completely different - the former were nomadic cattle herders who lived a pastoralist livelihood, and had an oral tradition of history much like in early Arabia or Europe, whereas the Indus Valley Civilization was settled, highly urbanised, and very structured. The post Indus Valley Civilization Indian Civilization seems to be a merger of the two cultures with the reverence for the cow, and the pastoral traditions in the Rig Veda, and the memorization of mantras coming from the Yamna traditions, and the writing of both North and South India, yoga, certain practices like yoga and certain deities like Shiva, and certain symbols like the Swastika, and a tradition of river/sea faring transport coming from the Indus Valley Civilization. If you want to know how this might have come about, look at the ancient Oxus Civilization which had Indus Valley and Yamna towns built close together and trading with each other. My take on this is that the Western coast was Ancestral Indian and they moved up the river valleys which were occupied by people of the Yamna culture to access raw materials for industrial manufacture and set up the Indus Valley cities on rivers to trade, mine, and process products for export to the Middle East and other places by sea. As in the Oxus, the two cultures merged and intermarried and became the modern Indian populations. The Indus Valley Civilization declined due to changing of the course of the Saraswathi river system, cutting off navigation to the sea, and only the minor part of the Indus Valley cities on the Indus river survived - explaining the persistence of Brahui in Baluchistan. The merging of the populations in culture, lifestyle and religion led to Hinduism, and the modern Indian culture. The claim that the R1 Y haplogroup shows that Indo Aryans invaded India from the steppe/Europe is debunked by the DNA evidence. There was a Yamna invasion of Europe which has been shown by DNA evidence. However this is not the case in India. There is no sudden change in R1 haplogroup in India that would indicate a sudden invasion. In addition the largest variation in the R1 haplogroup occurs in India, and the lowest in Western Europe, with Caucasian and Slavic DNA being closest to the Indian R1 haplogroup. This indicates the origin of the R1 haplogroup occurred in India and moved to Western Europe via the Steppe rather than the other way around. This probably occurred in two stages with Yamna populations moving into the steppes earlier, and then from the steppes to Western Europe in the transition from neolithic culture to early bronze age, and again during the bronze age collapse.
@vikramgurung3043
Ай бұрын
Brother you wrote a long line agreed..am north Indian east..but the Brahmin family in my tribe why they have blue,green some cat eyes..explain..also blond hair..suprise..
@globanxiety
Ай бұрын
So india was the first USA. damn
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
Ай бұрын
@@vikramgurung3043 defined it's from Steppe Aryan also could e IranHG because of them having blonde hair varianta from Ancient North Eurasians
@vikramgurung3043
Ай бұрын
@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 I am not archeological expert nor biologist but explain me Brahmins they call them self Arya putra,arayan..not Iranian but Russian Aryans their birth place steppe Rusia,look at Mahabharata serial they call themselves Arya putra.. Aryans belong to Europe..Brahmins I have seen have blue,green eyes some brown blond hairs..that's ain't Indian .are they..northern people more traits of rains..explain..
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
Ай бұрын
@@vikramgurung3043 I got u brah you r a northeast Indian tribal but u confused how some Indians special Brahmins and other North indians got blue eyes? The thing is we North Indians have partial Ancestry from Iranian Hunter Gatherers (Caucasoid) population who mixed with AASI (East Eurasian core) tribals from Central India and created Indus Valley Civilization and later Indo Iranians (Aryans) migrated splitted from our slavic cousins and migrated to Indian Subcontinent and Iranian plateau during late IVC and they mixed with IranHG dominant people of IVC and gave rise to us. We own our blue eyes and somewhat light hair and skin to our Indo Iranian and Iranian hunter gatherer ancestors.
@remyahari1922
Ай бұрын
Team, there is no aryan dna and dravidian dna. It's ASI or ANI. Despite of Being indian from South, I have more ANI than some indians from North of india. That's how mixed it is.
@jmab721
Ай бұрын
ANI ASI is an outdated model, but even so, having high ANI does not mean having high steppe by default. Because it's the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) heritage that makes up 70% of ANI, so a Southerner having high ANI usually means having high Indus Valley ancestry.
@sriharshacv7760
Ай бұрын
@@jmab721 I love the amount of speculation in these conversations. Tbh, it tells us how pointless this pursuit is.
@bennyboy-yj6si
Ай бұрын
I'm south Indian, My dad's ancestors were Indo European tracing back to modern Ukraine the recent generations were Brahmins until my Great grand father became Atheist, My mom is pure south Indian but i inherited my Dad's traits i can digest milk, my mom can't, my great grand dad was short 5'5 because of not eating meat but when he became atheist and consumed meat and milk there was height increase my dad is 5'9 and i'm almost 6 foot at 19 yrs
@jmab721
Ай бұрын
@@bennyboy-yj6si Stop making such embarrassing comments. Digesting milk is not exclusively dependent upon having steppe ancestry. Toda tribe of Southern India also has high lactose tolerance because their lifestyle selected for those traits despite having almost zero steppe.
@bennyboy-yj6si
Ай бұрын
@@jmab721 I agree, and that's not an embarassing comment lmao, Toda consume less meat rely more on agriculture tho
@MNSF99
2 ай бұрын
Amazing video. This is perhaps the best illustrated video I've seen on the topic of genetics. You copied off of Ancestralbrew didn't you? Even so, your content is much better.
@Ancestrallinguist
2 ай бұрын
Thank you :) I will be releasing a video on Italian DNA this week.
@don2006ka
Ай бұрын
Bunkum. Consider this irony first. You say Indus civilization was 65% Iranian farmers 35% AASI who wee Africans. You say later the Europeans came and mixed with these people. Strange that neither the Tamils of the South who formed the native Indian animistic and tantric culture nor the Brahmins all over India who formed vedic culture resemble wither the Iranian farmers or the Europeans respectively. You are neglecting the following facts: Indo Aryans migrated to India from South Central Asia Hindukush region. Around 2200 to 1900 BC, Sinthasta and Andronovo culture had been formed in Southern Kazakhstan region. BMAC culture had been formed in the Northern Afghanistan region. Indus Valley civilization had been formed in North Western India and Pakistan region. These cultures traded a lot with each and other and there was lot of movement of people between these cultures. Eg. Andronovo mixed a lot with BMAC to its South and vice versa. BmAC mixed a lot with IVC to its South and vice versa. Only from these mixed cultures a certain group called Indo Aryans migrated South of the Hindukush and formed the vedic culture. Similarly the Dravidian or tamil group was already developed in Northwestern India by then. The Andronovo, BMAC who were chalcolithic Iranians and the Dravidian people wer all Caucasoid, I repeat Caucasoid which is the keyword here. So Sinthasta which was already far removed from the earliest Proto Indo European Yamnaya culturally and racially mixed with BMAC who wer also caucasoid having their own culture and racial mix to form the Indo Aryans of South Central Asia who later migrated to India. When they arrived they met native peoples who were also caucasoid but different culturally and racially from them. Later there was further racial and cultural mixture in India to form the basis of Hinduism and the Indian race as we see today. Ascribing Brahmins to be Europeans and Tamils or Dravidians to Iranian farmers and proto africans is a very simplistic way of killing the history of modern day Indian race and culture. I did not talk about the Indian tribals and that is where I see the AASI people having greater prominence culturally and racially bit they are not related in any way to the mainstream South and North Indians of India.
@don2006ka
Ай бұрын
I will give example of fire culture. This fire worship is not found in any of the Indo European speaking people except the zorostrians who were originally Iranian and the Brahmins/upper castes of India. Its found in a weird sort of way though in Lithuania that is it. You have to accept that Sinthasta/Indo Iranians/Indo Aryans had a culture which was much more evolved from the earliest proto Indo European of 3500 BC. There could be some remote similarities in language and practices as I Greek or Roman history but culture is a continuous evolution that happens every 500 years or so. If Hinduism developed from a fusion of Vedic and native Indian practices, why cannot Sinthasta of 2200 BC or even Indo Aryan culture of South Central Asia of 1500 BC go through multiple cycles of cultural change and taking in the local people practices and also absorbing them racially into their fold. This is what happened in Indo Aryan people when they settled around Sindhu river. They were completely a different people to not only proto Indo European but also Sinthasta both culturally and racially. Bottomline Indians are not modern day Europeans in even 0.000001% of their ancestry both racially and culturally. Btw there was no concept of Europe in 2000 BC, duh.
@healer1000040
24 күн бұрын
Long story short, they are the minority people who came from Persia, destroyed the Indus and Gandhara civilizations made the caste system, made Dravianes slaves, and still the same DNA based on hatred rules India.
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
20 күн бұрын
AASI is also very distinct from Africans this guy is very ret@rd to use modern terms for ancient population
@Based.Afghan
5 ай бұрын
4:44 There is no such thing as Pathan Indians. The word pathan is an indianized word for Pashtuns ( The dominant ethnic group of Afghanistan ) The Pashtuns/Afghans are eastern iranic. So it doesn’t make sense to call them indians. Thats like calling a spanish guy slavic.
@celtofcanaanesurix2245
5 ай бұрын
it more like calling a basque guy spanish considering they are neighbors who are genetically similar
@Based.Afghan
5 ай бұрын
@@celtofcanaanesurix2245 yep its like 2 different branches of indo european family. Our kinsfolk are other eastern iranic peoples not the indics.
@hellotombat5616
4 ай бұрын
You must be ashamed for deleting original people of Afghanistan and India. There are indian pasthans remember Zakir Naik@@Based.Afghan
@hellotombat5616
4 ай бұрын
@@celtofcanaanesurix2245there are pathans of Indian origin no ancestors from Afghanistan 😂
@hellotombat5616
4 ай бұрын
And you guys don't relate to western Iran paternally instead north indians and European aka Aryans
@sauravghosh7064
4 ай бұрын
One of the few video by foreigner(non indian) that focus on dna rather than language based Indo-Aryan nonsense push by european historians
@Jgab602
4 ай бұрын
I don't know what you're implying here. the Indo-European migrations from the steppes of e Ukraine and European Russia into India, for example is definitely not nonsense, and they've impacted Europe much more than India, since it's rare to see anyone below 20% Yamnaya in Europe.
@donvtor24
4 ай бұрын
He is trying to hide linkage to european origin of upper caste Indians aka hindu Brahmins or ruling class elite indians as they are politically amassing power claiming their indigenousness and otherising everyone else. So Indo Aryan migration hurts their narration.😂
@Moonlight77162
Ай бұрын
@@donvtor24 naah dont just make a blatant lie lol
@guddu6424
Ай бұрын
Nonsense 😂😂😂 , Sanskrit, Hindi is belonging to indo Aryan language family.
@benjaminperez1149
Ай бұрын
Nonsense. There are quite a few of these DNA videos. Quit with the racial division please.
@StayFocused-ss5sp
2 күн бұрын
From Pakistan 🇵🇰 perfect and easily understable video on south Asian race
@ajay007au
24 күн бұрын
Nice half-baked story. You have to study more!!
@Shukpa
Ай бұрын
@AncestralLinguist what are the sources for the data you show around @4:43
@bikkyrana7581
Ай бұрын
Completely makes sense, how the identity & culture has been redefined by few europeans who migrated to this sub-continent
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
Ай бұрын
They are not Europeans cope they are Indo Europeans for a reason
@user-sy3dg1vk4x
Ай бұрын
TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS
@adelemarieish
Ай бұрын
Can you please tell us more about how the Yamnaya were in Western Ireland?
@Ancestrallinguist
Ай бұрын
I have a video on Irish DNA History. I might re-do it in the near future with improved graphics etc
@adelemarieish
Ай бұрын
@@Ancestrallinguist Thank you I'll go and look it up.
@manmohansingh8106
Ай бұрын
Whatever the DNA may say , every Tribe in India , whether organised in a state or not,is its original inhabitants . What’s a Tribe- a linguistic group, a division of mankind from single linguistic group in the beginning,and settled all over the world in its own territories now we see. The mankind first separated to each other in group by differences of tongues, later also separated by division of Land into continents. Further later,due to fights between groups, enslaving of defeated one mixing of blood occurred. As Sanskrit is written in dev nagri lipi,which is no earlier than 600 years.
@thomasbarca9297
5 ай бұрын
With first Australians and southern indians are related peoples
@ayeshaashraf9252
2 ай бұрын
No
@rishikeswaran8908
Ай бұрын
@@ayeshaashraf9252 native Australians (tribal people) maybe closer to southern Indians
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
@@rishikeswaran8908 yes your right, India has many races actually, what he explained was major there are many minor ones too.
@balramterry6697
Ай бұрын
Yes.
@ralph6417
Ай бұрын
@@rishikeswaran8908Not at all loose 😂
@Procopius464
4 ай бұрын
I'm surprised there's not all sorts of screaming in the comment section. Usually when this is brought up, a certain group comes out in force.
@balramterry6697
Ай бұрын
Their is no Culture older than India. The children of Africa are originally coming from Southern India.
@jmab721
Ай бұрын
Please stop making such embarrassing comments
@Dan-xx5jq
Ай бұрын
I agree with that too...the reason being, if you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot. Eventually they became darker and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. ( The opposite was true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, they had to retain heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose body heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that has albinism that has blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete sense that all different races that have come about from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have that hair change and straighten up. Call me names for my theory but one day I will be vindicated when science catches and the missing links are found in India. 6:31
@rajathispore2792
8 күн бұрын
@@jmab721In a dream, grandma said that to this person.
@rajathispore2792
8 күн бұрын
@@Dan-xx5jq Grandmas often come in dreams. Don't take that for science, please.
@au-delabattleworld9051
Ай бұрын
0:12 The video has barely started and there is already an error that Dravidians don't look like Africans, they are like North Indians with darker skin. And it is skin color that bothers Europeans because they think that North Indians are a subcategory of the superior white race and South Indians are Africans a subcategory of the inferior black race.
@anthonyproffitt5341
Ай бұрын
Is there actual evidence of the Yamnaya bringing R1a haplo group to India?
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
Ай бұрын
The genetic paper titled " formation of human populations in south and central asia " proves aryan migration clearly .
@VYBCTV
5 ай бұрын
This video is ok only. You should not jump to conclusions that IVC people spoke Tamil kind of statements without any proof. Please read my conclusions and statements which I made by referring Shinde report. I sent it to many videos including Ancestral Brew channel. Zagrosian Iranians who mixed with South Asian Hunter Gatherers(who were present all over south asia as hunter- gatherers) to form Indus Valley Civilization were those who split from Iranian pastoralists and hunters 8,000 years before they learned farming from Fertile Crescent, Iraq. So the language spoke by IVC people would have been proto Elamite mixed with some language spoken by South Asian hunter gatherers. Indo Aryans came after the decline of Indus Valley Civilization. They came from Southern Russia bordering Kazhaksthan. Before entering Afghanistan and Pakisthan. They learned agriculture from people of Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. That's why agricultural methods and crops used by Indo Aryans in Vedic period was identical to BMAC and not related to IVC. (Aryans cultivated barley, pulses and lentils in the banks of Saptha Sindhu, West Punjab. It was only after they mixed with IVC people they began to farm rice on Yamuna &Gangetic plains.) Sanskrit, Avestan & Mittani are closely related languages than any other Indo European language. All these three languages are 3700 years old. Only relation we have with these European languages is because there is a common ancestor for all Indo European languages originated in West Eurasian Steppes that was not Sanskrit. It is yet to be foundout. Sanskrit originated in Afghanisthan. Later spread to Saptha Sindhu region, Ganga, Yamuna & Narmada. Finally came down to Southern Peninsula & Srilanka. Tamil originated in Tamilnadu from Proto Dravidian. It is 2800 year old language. IVC people spoke a language related to Proto Elamite. While South Asian Hunters spoke a Srilankan Vedda related or Australian Aboriginal language. Both languages are not spoken today in South Asia. Ok coming to genetics 63% Indians are mix of people from South Russian Steppes, Zagros,Iran& South Asia. North Indians have more Steppe ancestry because of various invasions and settlements from Turkmenstan, Persia etc. But their basic DNA is same as South Indian Upper & Middle castes. North Easterners and Ladakhi people have Sino Tibetan and Sino Burmese ancestors. But their culture and traditions are like any indigenous tribal culture found around our country. No matter where we come from we are Indians first. Jai Hind. Yours Gouri Sankar.K 👍🙏🇮🇳 www.palakkadwalks.blogspot.com
@jspillai1869
4 ай бұрын
What is the story of Nairs of Kerala, genetic makeup as there are conflicting theories of their origin. My husband is from Kunisserri in Palakkad.
@VYBCTV
4 ай бұрын
@@jspillai1869 Hello madam, there are lot of stories about Nairs like any other community based on phenotypes, facial features and folklore. Ahichatra (Rampur, U.P)Naga and Nepali Newar origins are the most popular stories about Nairs and Bunts circulating on the internet. Bunts, Nairs, Ambalavasis and Thiyyas are matrilineal castes. But none of the castes in UttarPradesh or Uttarakhand are matrilineal. Nagas were worshipped in many parts of India particularly forest tribes. We don't know what South Asian Hunters and Zagrosian people worshipped before Indo Aryan migration. 70% of what we call Hinduism was invented by Indo Aryan/Sanskrit speakers only. It is an umbrella term for many philosophical thoughts and spiritual beliefs.(Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, Puranas, Ithihasas, Agamas, Thantras etc.) It maybe fascinating to know that ancient people were more broadminded when it comes to marriage. People of Indian subcontinent is a great example. Steppe DNA of Tamil Brahmins are highest among Southern Brahmins. Iyer - 13-20% Iyengar - 11-20% Tulu Brahmin - 15% Namboodiri - 12-16% Telugu Brahmin - 12-17% Kannada Brahmin - 11-18% Marathi Brahmins - 13-16% Konkani Brahmins - 13-17% Closest Genetic Distance Of Tamil Brahmins To Other Communities. (Iam a mix of Iyengar and Iyer.) 1. Telugu Brahmins 2. Malayali Nairs 3. Malayali Nasranis 4. Gujarati Baniyas 5. Punjabi Gujjars 6. Marathi Brahmins 7. Kannada Brahmins 8. Konkani Brahmins 9. Bengali Brahmins 10. UttarPradesh Kayasthas Steppe DNA of Nairs & Pathare Prabhus are highest among South Indian non Brahmins. Nairs on average have 10% steppe DNA. It reaches 16% maximum. Pathare Prabhus on average have 14% steppe DNA. It reaches 18% maximum. Steppe Blood Of Non Brahmin South Indians Who Have More Than 5% Are Given Below Nairs - 10-16% Bunts - 10-12% Ambalavasis - 8-14% Thiyyas - 9-11% Kodavas - 10-13% Ezhavas - 7-11% Reddy - 5 - 9% Balija - 6 - 9% Kamma - 7-11% Vellalar - 9-10% Mukkulathor - 8-12% Vokkaliga - 5- 10% Marathas - 8-12% Mahar - 8-10% Chandra Seniya Kayastha Prabhu - 10-16% Pathare Prabhus - 14 - 18% Among Non Hindus in South India Nasranis - 9-15% Konkani Christian - 15% Mappilas - 10% Rowther - 12% Marakkar - 9% Hyderabadi Muslim - 14% Nadar Christian - 8% As you all know Iam an online researcher and blogger specializing in philosophy, spirituality, history, linguistics, archaeology and genetics of south asia. I want to share a great news in this group us Tamil Brahmins have largest percentage of Sintastha blood (Poltkava + Abashevo) among South Indian Brahmins. Iyers - 13% - 20% Iyengar - 11% - 20% And we have the largest percentage of Indus Valley Civilization blood (Zagrosians From Iran/Proto Elamites + South Asian Hunter Gatherers) among all Brahmin groups in India. Iyers - 54% - 73% Iyengars - 49% - 68% Wow..😃👌🏻 Proud to have both in large amounts.🇮🇳 30% Tamil Brahmins have 13- 20 %Anatolian DNA received from BMAC. And 20% of us have 3 - 9% Sino Tibetan DNA too. Courtesy : South Asian Ancestry Reddit. Thankyou.
@TingTong2568
4 ай бұрын
@@VYBCTV thanks for the info
@VYBCTV
4 ай бұрын
@@TingTong2568 🙏😊
@cameronpillay8050
2 ай бұрын
Nobody gonna read all yr bs 🤭 the ivc were tamil people, even the name ' Harappa ' is a Tamil word 😊 continue hatin' , it's amusing 🤡🔫
@adriansummers3462
23 күн бұрын
The Fertile Crescent begins along the nile
@sriharshacv7760
Ай бұрын
3:54 on the right is so beautiful and lively. One good thing that came out of AI.
@user-jan17
Ай бұрын
IM SOUTH INDIAN BUT MY SKIN COLOR IS WHITE HOW ?
@ayazahmed9489
Ай бұрын
Your ancestors might be north indian who went to south india and did not intermixed.
@user-jan17
Ай бұрын
@@ayazahmed9489 ok
@nuzeta48
Ай бұрын
You must have stolen it 😅
@smitprmr
Ай бұрын
Maybe Yamnaya DNA originated in your village and later invaded Europe and other low life peasants up there
@user-jan17
28 күн бұрын
@@ayazahmed9489 im a one doubt same part of north Indian people are black how
@elidesportelli325
Ай бұрын
1:30 very interesting, I love this argouments❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@Perumanian
Ай бұрын
I like it because there are less likes on these videos - in which case it is usually truthful. Those crazy Indian nationalist stay away when faced with truth
@gaslitworldf.melissab2897
5 ай бұрын
I love this. Why didn't I discover this sooner? I'm African American, only 13% of my DNA is European (Nothern), but decades ago, an Indian who worked at an Indian restaurant I frequented finally asked my if I was Indian. At that time, I never wore my hair natural. My complexion is similar to Angelo Bassets, just a bit redder. At the time, I was surprised that an Indian could imagine that I was Indian, but this suggests, that with my hair straightened, I resemble the southernmost Indian. Plus, I'm petite, only 4.10.5.
@Ancestrallinguist
5 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Yes there is definitely a big genetic overlap. Thank you 🙏
@TingTong2568
2 ай бұрын
Do you look like chilli from TLC?
@Shiva-nx1tn
Ай бұрын
Do you look like Zendaya
@Gog_Magog179
Ай бұрын
If the Indo-Aryans close to Europeans were the Brahmins & priest that founded the Caste system in India, then the closest to their Hindu religion of ancient India I can think of is “Greek Mythology” or “Egyptian Mythology”. So Id suspect the Indo-Aryans entered India just around 300 BC during Alexander the Greeks conquests & expansion to Near East Asia, North Africa like Egypt is part of Alexander’s conquered territories. But I still hypothesized that the earliest inhabitant of India subcontinent look like those in Southeast Asia today, the Austroasiatics & Austronesians, their history is very early as 3,000 BC. Before India people got heavily mixing to Melanesians of Papua & Australoid and Persians & Greeks, or maybe even Egyptians. Coz how do you explain the spread of Buddhism & Hindu religion, even language & Abugida script system on those territories in Southeast Asia but the inhabitants look way too different in phenotype of Austronesian & Indian; in the same way why Buddhism & Hindu didnt spread to Melanesian territories in Papua NG & Australian aborigines.
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
Do you know Indian history or not and why would it spread? Did Africans spread their religion onto others ??? Pls stop talking nonsense
@debkamalsarkar1521
Ай бұрын
5:31 here... No you'd be pretty wrong to have said Caste system was based on Race... If so then most of the Brahmans and Kshatriyas would've been people with predominantly more of Yamanaya group But that certainly is not the case Otherwise the research is alright Caste fold wasn't so brutal in the past The idea went horribly wrong for sure But it was never made to be a mean to suppress one group And as you said the population was pretty mixed and it is till this date A good video but giving statements about a social structure without gathering proper intel is wrong It may feed wrong ideas to the viewers
@pryankamahmud7172
22 күн бұрын
I don't understand the point of undermining Aryan Migration or Invasion theory. For a fun fact as a Bengali Muslim living in Bangladesh we have very low northern Indian ancestry. Most of our population has lower caste converted Hindus or Buddhists though very few people will admit that. Lower caste people didn't have access to religious Sanskrit texts readily. Despite that right now we speak a language that's more than 70% Sanskrit. It only proves the massive impact of that small number of people that migrated from central Asia. It's very hard to change languages. Muslims ruled for nearly 500 years and the British for 200 years. You won't see people speaking Farsi or English in the streets. That means there was total domination by the Aryans at some point in history to shift the culture in a new direction. You don't only survive by passing genes you can survive by ideology and culture too.
@rjhrai
23 күн бұрын
If you want to know more and more up to date info on this watch vids of Nilesh Oak.
@LotusFish
Ай бұрын
My opinion here is based on me being a Southern Indian and I have observed enough faces in the region: I'm not a historian or any research scholar. But I can say this video clip is not hundred percent right.: . This author purposely forgot that India is Asia head. There is not a thing discussed about "the Indian Asian race"...... Possibly, logically Asiatic Indians still exist with exact Asiatic facial features all throughout the country. African mixes are there but very less percentage. Southern side people are more of an Asian features Iranian or some other white ethnic group features mix. Southerners have dark skin due to the super tropical climate not because of the African mix. Having African Asian features mix clans also there in minimum percentage. See Africa itself has so many clans which are different from each other with different facial bone structure and different body types, Even though all of them are in Africa. No race or no ethnicities are hundred percent pure. If they are all hundred percent pure then they must be very new clans. If we talk "About India DNA", We should wonder how many level of human integration amalgamation have been happening in India for the past 9,0000 years. This many thousands of clans keep on mingling growing exponentially and creating a new clan gene set is amazing . It is really the height of being in a great civilization. So no one can find the exact source DNA groups. It is not really necessary also. Mixed clans produce healthy gene pool. So why bother??! . I least bother to make sense anyway. This is just my personal opinion. Don't take it as a serious note. 😅
@user-jt3dw6vv4x
Ай бұрын
You are referring to the AASI but the idea of pure AASI peoples living in modern India is no longer true, the people of India are so heavily mixed that a full AASI person does not exist. This is why there are still no samples to date where an individual is 100% AASI. However there are tribal groups in parts of eastern and southern India who are mostly of AASI heritage that happen to have more "Asiatic" features similar to those found in tribals of Southeast Asia like the Semang and Maniq. This is because they are all of East Eurasian (Basal Asian) origin and share closer genetic affinity to Tianyuan Man than most other Indians do.
@bbt9458
Ай бұрын
I am the blood of Bharat
@anniemaraj8773
Ай бұрын
😂 starts off with a wrong premis
@NoRenderMoody
18 күн бұрын
you forgot the mongolian races as well...
@truthseeker-nv6ny
Ай бұрын
Brace yourself for attacks from triggered andh modi bhakts 😂
@HelloWorld11332
Ай бұрын
You should use your brain to analyse things being said. ``` He ignores that R1A L657 is the most common clade found in India accounting for over 70% people. There's not even one L657 sub clade found in Sintashta or steppe region, also this subclade evolved/mutated around 4200 ybp or 2200 BCE. Mean admixture date of the caste with highest steppe ancestory(high caste Brahmins) is around 900-500 BCE. *Stop lying man* ```
@imgoingtotoilet7695
Ай бұрын
Who is bhakts?
@imgoingtotoilet7695
Ай бұрын
@@HelloWorld11332☝️🤓
@omnipresent2812
Ай бұрын
Truth seeker is brainwashed by religion, it seems. Modi ka naam sunthe hee uska knees hit karna shuru hotha..
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
@@HelloWorld11332 nobody is lying you people are just in denial 🤣
@dakota-rt8kd
Ай бұрын
Yeah, i figured that out... Haunted House 😮
@Devine_wave
2 ай бұрын
Fake 😂 Aryan theory is debunked . Even south indians many habe fair skin and north many have dark skin .major indian DNA comes from harrappa ancestry .this is said by your own david reich .😂
@truthseeker-nv6ny
Ай бұрын
Aryan theory is genetically proven and accepted by most geneticists
@truthseeker-nv6ny
Ай бұрын
Aryan theory is not debunked. It's accepted globally by all geneticists. Only few Indian geneticists with strong political views on this issue reject it
@sahilsingh6048
Ай бұрын
Andhbhakt
@truthseeker-nv6ny
Ай бұрын
Aryan theory was not debunked it still the most accepted theory globally by majority of experts
@sachinpotdar7798
Ай бұрын
@bharani_tidadinaryan Brahmins your hatred will kill you arya means noble not race
@movingforward2570
8 күн бұрын
There is no all out of Africa. Indian 1st migrated out of Sumer, Mesopotamia.
@VivekSingh-76
5 ай бұрын
You are forgetting Pakistan and Bangladesh when talking about indian history and DNA
@asherswing
5 ай бұрын
they are india
@user-qz7nq3ts8z
4 ай бұрын
Nobody cares 😂😂😂
@VivekSingh-76
4 ай бұрын
@@user-qz7nq3ts8z yes kids nowadays doesn't have any respect for their parents
@agnelomascarenhas8990
4 ай бұрын
You are confusing Nations with Geographical entities. The focus is South Asia.
@asherswing
4 ай бұрын
@@VivekSingh-76 lol
@randomgirlonyt3221
5 ай бұрын
I’m not Indian myself but I have tons and tons of ancestors from India like years back I think 10 century or something so it’s interesting to watch my people nowerdays has dark skin and a lot of Indian complexions
@deepacharen4534
14 күн бұрын
🙏🏾🤍☀️🤍🙏🏾God bless
@Lulougonz
Ай бұрын
What about the Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman speaking Mongoloid race inhabiting the north eastern part of India.?
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
15 күн бұрын
You guys Originated from Lao Hoabian and Tibeto burmans also have some significant AASI
@Lulougonz
14 күн бұрын
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 I don't think so. Because, our oral history speak about their origin from Yunan, China. Their DNA also matched with that of the Chinese and Koreans.
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
14 күн бұрын
@@Lulougonz ngl Tibeto Burmans did have Ancestry from some culture i forgot about it from China. But Lao Hoabian is different from these culture but still related as both of them are East Eurasian. Also if u track very early in times you can trace your Ancestry from South India because AASI is also East Eurasian but still very drifted.
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
14 күн бұрын
@@Lulougonz All East Eurasian lineage splited from AASI.
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
14 күн бұрын
@@Lulougonz i will say get yourself a hunter gatherer breakdown of u want to know your true Ancestry.
@rajatdwivedi1251
Ай бұрын
Good information , that's true scientific evidence
@Ancestrallinguist
Ай бұрын
Many many thanks
@Kal-pw9vl
Ай бұрын
Yamnaya haplogroup was R1b
@user-pb4rv3cd4v
Ай бұрын
Bro you western theory don't tell you really find the indian civilizations you have a time machine oldest civilization in the world
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
Ай бұрын
Most backward unscientific blind faith hinduthwa !
@rjaditya6865
22 күн бұрын
What do you scientifically mean by Aryan DNA and dravidian DNA Is there really such a thing ....difference at DNA levels?
@user-pb4rv3cd4v
Ай бұрын
Dravidian are not Africans Dravidians are highest in the world mainly Tamil Nadu madhura city chola Dynasty time advanced and kumarykandamu lost of this civilization
@SisayBilelegne
Ай бұрын
All human beings start or came from africa.however the rest countries do not want to say.because they may feel undeveloped,3rd world country.the truth is africa is the mother of all humanties.❤🎉
@don2006ka
Ай бұрын
Completely neglecting the fact that modern European race especially North west Europe and also all the North Eastern Europe has majorly a component of native European fatmers racially. Yamanaya had neither blonde hair nor blue eyes which developed in Europe among European farmers. Even the skulls recreated of Yamanaya bear resemblance more to Indian features than modern day European features. Native europeans adopted the language of the Yamanaya but esp North west and North east europe has a major native european component in their race. Some remote similarities in race between upper caste Indians and Europeans can be found only with certain people of Central and South Central and South eastern europe that too only with a few. Because Yamanaya racial component went majorly to Sinthasta but it was diluted a lot in Europe by native European racial component.
@don2006ka
Ай бұрын
If you look at some of the Irish very closely they have upper caste Indian features, same for Eastern French, Northeastern Spanish around Catalonia, Northern Italians, southwrn Germans and the Swiss, some Romanians, Hungarians etc. Because these come from the Celtic people who were originally in Central and Eastern Europe from where they migrated through French territory to eventually land up in the British Isles and mainly the western part of the Isles. But even the Irish are majorly mixed with the Viking and Scandinavian settlers and the Normans. So similarities to Indian upper caste people features is few and far in between. Take note that Vikings were no way original Indo Europeans they have derived their racial component mainly from very ancient migrations from Siberia. The Vikings, Germanic people the Saxons and Angles, the Norman's who were basically the Vikings settled in France form the main component of modern day North Western Europeans like the Germans, English, 60% French, 30% Irish and also the very ancient Siberians form bulk of the racial component of North Eastern europeans like the Czechs, Russians, Baltic countries etc.
@Ancestrallinguist
Ай бұрын
Interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing
@don2006ka
Ай бұрын
Thanks for understanding. May I admit though that there are some remote similarities between Indo Aryan, ancient Saxon and Norse mythology. This is well covered in a video by a lady comparing Indo European gods (I don't have the video link as of now, will share it later). But the Saxons, North Germans were mixed racially with the Scandinavians though the resultant race may have adopted some of the original Indo European mythology and hence the similarities. I am a upper caste Brahmin myself and have lot of interest in comparative ancient mythology and discovering the roots. Bottomline, there was of course an original proto Indo European race emerging from the Caucuses in Eurasia and spreading East and west through the huge area of the open steppe grasslands. But difficult to connect them racially in the modern context necause there has been racial admixture over the centuries both sides European as well as Asian.. I find Indo Aryan like features in only some of the Europeans but rhat too if I look at their faces very closely. And Indo Aryan or Brahmin/upper caste Indian features itself is mixed not directly but indirectly absorbing racial features of the native Indians though even as of today after admixture you can differentiate Indo Aryan features in upper castes with those of the native Indians. Of course we are all proud Indians now culturally and racially irrespective of the caste differentiation.
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
20 күн бұрын
Yamnaya had Blonde hair and blue eyes in low frequency Yamnaya= Eastern European hunter gatherer+ Caucasus/Iranian hunter gatherer. EHG carried genes for blue eyes,red hair and CHG carried some genes for light skin and some blonde hair variants.
@don2006ka
18 күн бұрын
@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 lol read history first instead of writing after drinking 😂 Yamanaya were caucaus people and had no blonde hair. It was corded ware culture and bell Beaker culture that developed out of Yamanaya mixing with a few European farmers that had traces of blonde/brownish hair and greenish/Hazel eyes.
@Just_forfun9140
Ай бұрын
This whole theory is based on just 60 skeletons that were found? Or did I miss something? Do we all have some Yamnaya DNA, no wonder the reason for wars and violence all over the world.
@abhikulkarni7089
Ай бұрын
When isee this type of video 😂😵
@user-pe5uk2zf4o
Ай бұрын
Typische Fehlinterpretation
@human8454
Ай бұрын
Do you know Jatt caste
@joylamoo
Ай бұрын
Bro jatt caste only came in 16th 17th century before that those people were from other hindu caste
@Dan-xx5jq
Ай бұрын
what is so special about them?
@N0-PvP-Plz
Ай бұрын
Jats have highest European dna in all of India
@lakshmikesavan5284
Ай бұрын
Nonsense about Aryan Dravidian race theory. This video should be demonetized.
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
Ай бұрын
Aryan dravidian is 100 % true. the language groups are quite different .
@glennjacksonofficial3001
Ай бұрын
It is true that a skeleton or skeletons from the Indus Valley has DNA that is Iranian related, but the idea that it was the IRANIANS who migrated into India and gave us this Iranian ancestry is just an assumption. Why can't the opposite be true as well? In fact a study by Vasant Shinde actually showed that it was the otherway around, as he showed that one individual who was a woman had a DNA that is ANCESTRAL to the Iranian population. But this is only one individual, because analysing DNA in India is very difficult, due to India's harsh climates, and geography.
@sanjayshah7776
Ай бұрын
This video is misleading in several aspects. It is almost propoganda Eg The Aryans migration/invasion theory has been debunked thoroughly. The CASTE is 100% Portuguese word. Until colonialisation , India had VARNA & JATI
@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
Ай бұрын
Wh and how aryan migration was debunked ?
@sanjayshah7776
Ай бұрын
@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Seriously, please study the latest evidence. There is no architectural or any other evidence to support the Aryans Invasion/Migration theory into India. And for sure they did not create SANSKRIT LANGUAGE or produce the RIG VEDAS, (which was the motivation for manufacturing the Aryans Migration Theory). The colonial elites and current elites do not want the world to examine the very real OUT OF INDIA THEORY .....for which there is a vast amount of evidence. Slowly all this is being revealed. The good thing is, the Western simply dismiss the truth and evidence supporting the OUT OF INDIA THEORY .
@jmab721
Ай бұрын
5:18 A very important point that often gets missed in such videos is that the Caste system was not based on your lineage initially. Only around 100 BCE (1400+ years AFTER steppe migrations) did this system reach a developmental stage where the dominant religious groups at the time turned it into a Nepotism system. We have genetic data confirming it as well as the literature. What this means is that the Steppe people _did not_ establish a lineage based caste system we see later on in Ancient India. Because they freely intermixed with the locals. They had established a merit based caste system, not birth based. It's only the **mixed descendents** of those ancestral populations later on that created a hegemonic system based on one's lineage. One more thing that was missed in this video is that the correlation of steppe with caste tends to break the more Northwest we go in South Asia. It's uppercastes _AND_ Northwest South Asians who have steppe. That aligns well with what we always knew from the literature. Northwest ancient India was early Vedic hub, and early Vedic age did not have caste system based on birth. Even the only place in the Rigveda where we do see the mention of some earlier form of caste system, that was a LATER ADDITION to the text, meaning that originally even that wasn't there. Other Indo European societies like the ones in Europe were more similar to this _flexible_ form of profession system. No mention of shudra/untouchable either in the Rigveda. Just like no mention of them in European IE societies. All the groups with extremely high levels of steppeMLBA DNA in South Asia today are either of lower status or of the status of outcastes(those who are outside the caste system). All of them are Northwest South Asian, most being traditional war-oriented communities, again being similar to early Vedic system. Only brahmins are the exception that are part of the caste system as well as relatively higher in steppeMLBA, which is due to long standing endogamy. Interestingly, brahmins from Northwest are NOT high in steppe because the region was never so rigid in Varna system to begin with. While brahmins from Middle & Eastern India, the gangetic plains, are very high in steppeMLBA. The region being the centre of post vedic society when orthodoxy had greatly taken place and exploitation based on birth had also increased.
@shainpv
Ай бұрын
AIT crap rehashed.
@CW-rx2js
4 ай бұрын
One correction: the aryans originated in the shintashta culture, not the yamanaya... They are two different populations and cultures
@heinous7036
2 ай бұрын
There were no Aryans in india before they arrived. The Yamnaya were the Aryans
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
Ай бұрын
@@heinous7036Yamnaya is PIE not Aryan actually Aryans originated in Sinthasta he is right.
@sachinpotdar7798
Ай бұрын
@@heinous7036Aryans are indians not arians
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
@@sachinpotdar7798 😂🤣
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 what are you saying? So Shintashta is who n originated where?
@SajiSNairNair-tu9dk
17 күн бұрын
🤔
@jegannagaseras6323
Ай бұрын
They have to correct the dna finding, the dna not perfect yet
@Sukhatirtha-ej6go
4 ай бұрын
There is out of Africa into India and export to all over the world theory..Opine
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
That's nonsense theory branded and made in India proudly 🤣
@vipinsharma213
26 күн бұрын
You are Pentium 1 in the Era of i7 stop spreading lies, and get educated.
@anshurani6265
Ай бұрын
i dont think any of it is true , i stopped watching when you said Iranians came to India ,the truth is Indians migrated to Iran, history will be updated by Indians just wait a little more , as lot is happening in India, lot of research based on new excavations
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
20 күн бұрын
Saar AASI Migrated to Iran Saar😂 Iranian hunter gatherer is Indian saaar😂😊
@Aspeca_music
11 күн бұрын
lol india is once a country of richness..Sumerians were black people who were in indus river..Iranian didn't exist before dravidians..
@thatweirdintjkiddo6251
11 күн бұрын
@@Aspeca_music Sumerians were Caucasoids not blacks wtf u smoking?
@yashrao5269
4 ай бұрын
Invite niraj rai on your show or podcasts who is one of the world's foremost archaeogeneticists and molecular biologists and you will get the clear picture of DNA report on Indian Civilisation. Most of the things you said are factually inaccurate
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
Actually they are paid to talk nonsense and I dunno what your yapping about because he too said same things almost the only thing what he was trying to say extra and giving India credit because of the M17 strand responsible for the white gene that started in India, to be honest this is still not 100 percent assured it's still not confirmed and being tested because of the same features I also at one point thought maybe Europeans are like albino dravidians 😅 but is not the case because if it were true, Indians would be shown not having these markers such as iranic if they were the starter of this gene plus all non Africans would have Indian in their dna breakdown which they don't since Europeans are claimed to be albino dravidians and then even the Asians and austroasoatic people would have the same but in fact it's reverse! I have watched alot of geneologist who show live how they do the testing it doesn't ever show what your people say. India was homogeneous for a very less time after that they got mixed from all sides till today 😂 so the only people who you'll find are full fledged authentic Indian who have real 100 percent AASI are the tribals people who have not mixed . Which are very few in numbers you can count them.
@nirupamap7486
Ай бұрын
Aryan Invasion is completely disproved. Pls redo your video.
@user-jt3dw6vv4x
Ай бұрын
He didn't say it was an invasion.
@Ak47-vv4sr
Ай бұрын
@user-rh9yk6oy9r doesn't seems like ?
@vanniking8183
Ай бұрын
Who completely disproved it ? Is it you ? Nut case don't make such stupid blanket statements. South Indians are genetically totally different from North Indians . By the way I am a hindu not some one who hates hindu or sanskirit
@RaviKumar-yg8jv
Ай бұрын
lol
@NoName-yn9bt
13 күн бұрын
... DNA historian does not know who his own father is ... he asked his mother, she does not know either ... the dude, the son of an unknown father, seems to be suffering from terminal mental illness ...
@grizz9150
5 ай бұрын
So thats why the Nazis chose an ancient Sanskrit symbol for their flag I always wondered why. Europeans and northern Indians are both Aryan. Essentially they just went the other way out of Iran. Interesting.
@KolyaUrtz
4 ай бұрын
well norther indians are only 10% aryans, Europeans depending where, can be up to 90% aryans
@Procopius464
4 ай бұрын
The Swastica was also in use in Europe during the Roman period and even somewhat during the medieval period. It was also used in Persia. It was an ancient Indo-European design, but pretty much every branch of the family stopped using it, except for Indians, who persist in it mainly for religious reasons.
@peshmerge44
4 ай бұрын
No, the Nazis started using the term aryan, when it was en vogue to write fantastical stories about once 'race'. No germanic peoples ever used that term until they started doing stupid race theories. Europeans are not and never were aryans.
@KolyaUrtz
4 ай бұрын
ofc "aryans" as a race dont exist...but europeans are descendants of aryans(the ancient tribe). This has been established by science and genetics.
@grizz9150
4 ай бұрын
@@peshmerge44 That is simply not true. Agricultural civilizations who originated in Iran entered Europe through Anatolia at the same time the Indus valley civilization was formed. (~9000 BC). The Yamnaya civilization(~3500 BC) came from them then actually migrated from Eastern Europe went both directions to Ireland and Northern India
@standingbear998
Ай бұрын
no one has or knows what any ancient persons dna was.
@Ancestrallinguist
Ай бұрын
I can compare your dna to ancient populations. I offer this in my G25 masterclass
@user-jt3dw6vv4x
Ай бұрын
Samples exist. We know the genetic makeup of humans by the samples we acquire which are then tested.
@MithunKKS
Ай бұрын
So you "believe" in out of Africa theory?? And rely heavily on the Dna researches. What about archeological researches as well. Please go through Shanti Pappu paper in Nature at 2018 about Attirambakam stone tools. Your mind will be blown and you will start questioning out of Africa. And although everyone calls us, Thamizhs, as "Dravidans", please understand its an exonym. We , Thamizhs, are not "Dravidans". We are Thamizhs(also wrongly written in English as Tamils).
@sachinpotdar7798
Ай бұрын
The Hindus of modem times trace their descent from these great sages, saints, and Rishis of pre-historic ages, and consider themselves blessed on account of such exalted lineage. They glory in the names of their forefathers, and feel an unconquerable pride because of the purity, unselfishness, spirituality, and God-consciousness of their holy ancestors. This noble pride has prevented the members of different communities from holding free intercourse and from intermarrying with foreigners and invading nations, and has thus kept the Aryan blood pure and unadulterated. If they had not possessed that tremendous national pride and had mixed freely with all people by whom they were over-run, we should not find in India today the full-blooded descendants of the pure Aryan family. Hindu society is divided into hundreds of communities; each community consists of several clans and each clan has its own peculiar customs and rules. These clans, again, are made up of numerous families, ‘kula’, and the members of these families are the individual units. The members of the family are governed by the ‘kula-dharma’ or family customs, the families must obey the clan family customs, and the clan families must he governed by the rules of the community. The members of the family enjoy absolute freedom in everything that is approv-ed of by the other families of the same clan. If the common opinion of the majority of the families of one clan be against any act of violation of its long-standing custom, then it should not be performed. If any one dares to violate such custom, then he forfeits all the privileges which he may have in his family-life in the community. He will be deprived of social intercourse and relationship with the clan family and of the protection of the community. This clan family is called in Sanskrit ‘gotra’. There is no English word by which I can translate this term, the literal meaning of ‘gotra’ being ‘lineage’, that is, the descendants of common ancestors. Originally there were about twenty-four Rishis who were gotra-makers or makers of clans. They were all sages and seers of truth, who lived in the Vedic period and were inspired. The hymns of the Vedas and other holy scriptures in India came through them, and they were leaders as well as clan-makers. We all trace our descent from these great Rishis. Again, the community of many dans is called in Sanskrit jati, Greek ‘genus’, Roman ‘gens’, or the patriarchal family in the largest sense of the term. Each community consists of many clans, which live together, obeying the laws of the community. The rules of propriety and impropriety, marriage ceremonies and funeral rites, rituals and ceremonies, amusements and occupations, professions and industries, nay, all the details of social life must be in perfect harmony with the laws and customs which have been handed down through generations to the existing communities. These social laws are called ‘jati-dharma’ or the duties of a jati or community. Each clan family, from the lowest Pariah to the highest Brahmin, is guided and governed by the jati-dharma. No position, profession, or industry can be accepted by any member of a community if the community as a body disapproves of it. If any member wishes to fulfil a desire, he must first consider whether it is in perfect harmony with the customs of the family (kula-dharma), then with the duties of the dan family (gotra-dharma), and lastly with the laws of the community (jati-dharma); and, after establishing harmony with all these, he can do what he pleases. In case of difference of opinion, whatever the community decides for the family and the individual they must implicitly obey. The leaders of the community are the final authorities. The individual sacrifices his freedom for the sake of the family, the interest of the family is merged into that of the dan, and the clan sacrifices its interest for the community.
@user-yl5tg3ry7t
Ай бұрын
Mengarut kalu dia dulu... Knp dna dia lewat 50,000 tahun...sedang kn dna semang yg itu Negrito 75,000 tahun
@HelloWorld11332
Ай бұрын
He ignores that R1A L657 is the most common clade found in India accounting for over 70% people. There's not even one L657 sub clade found in Sintashta or steppe region, also this subclade evolved/mutated around 4200 ybp or 2200 BCE. Mean admixture date of the caste with highest steppe ancestory(high caste Brahmins) is around 900-500 BCE. *Stop lying man*
@MotivationalVideos4Every1
23 күн бұрын
You included an entire "INDEPENDENT" country of Pakistan in India. Indus Vally Civilization refers to the area which is in PAKISTAN, not in India. Do some research before making suching absurd videos
@asherswing
5 ай бұрын
as an indian i approve of this video
@kingalpha4203
5 ай бұрын
Do u believe ur early roots are black african? I’ve been told Indians don’t like Africans so I ask to understand not to bother you ❤
@Ancestrallinguist
5 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏
@yashrao5269
4 ай бұрын
Yamnaya Tribe originates from modern Central asia which has a haplo group that matches indian DNA, and h is claiming these tribes are originated from southern russia. I Dont understand which point approves his video??
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
@@yashrao5269 it's crazy yeaa
@animefreakindia3236
4 ай бұрын
R1a1 is indian origin😂😂
@sahilsingh6048
4 ай бұрын
Out of india theory is a shit theory ,nonsense.
@KolyaUrtz
4 ай бұрын
that makes no sense whatsoever. Why would Europeans then be 90% r1a1 while indians only 10%. If it originated in india it would be other way around
@Procopius464
4 ай бұрын
That is the opposite of the truth, and I don't see how anyone can think that.
@kikaa1884
3 ай бұрын
@@KolyaUrtzonly 10% that's shows how ignorant you are go check properly of North Indians
@truthseeker-nv6ny
Ай бұрын
R1a1 originated in the caucuses steppe region or Eastern Europe nowhere near India
@paramagan
3 күн бұрын
What kind of crap is this? Our vedic culture is way older than what you stateing?
@ur_You
8 күн бұрын
HAPLOGROUP-R originated in Indian subcontinent😂 Your video shows that you believe on Western historian😂I am reading deeply about Indian linguistic more than 2-3 years. According to western, Shiva is Dravidian god but he have fair skin and blue eyes and Ram is Aryan ( aryaputra) but he is dark skinned and black eyes. Harappan civilization Pashupatinath seel, Rigveda like scripture. We have different genes but northern are not migrated from Europe. Yamanas is mentioned in Rigveda as yavans, Persians as Parsa but it's very deep subject. Your video is Just a normal Western video
@prithwishroy
Күн бұрын
Lol Ram, Krishna and Shiva all of them are distinguished with Black-blue colour 😂😂 Even Hun king Mihirkul followed Shiv 😂 If you say Indra is an Aryan God then ok 😂
@ur_You
Күн бұрын
@@prithwishroy you ever read a Sanskrit or tamil litrature. Go & read then bark here. Go & search in google or any trustful site. Blue is their aura not colour. Bramha shiv radha parvati was white skin
@ur_You
Күн бұрын
@@prithwishroy I don't know you ever read a litrature but I'm giving you a proof that shiva is white" कर्पूरगौरम करुणावताराम" white as Kapoor god of kindness । Tell me a valid single tamil or Sanskrit literature in which shiva is mentioned as black. Otherwise don't bark
@prithwishroy
Күн бұрын
@@ur_You oo hallo I also said same thing 1st of all Shiva worshipping started in Gupta period in that time Aryan mixed with local culture And Buddhists mentioned mihirkul as an reincarnation of Devil Then never call Shiva a white devil Neither Jain,Buddist wrote anything white Shiva,they always wrote,drawing blue Shiva You can check it
@ur_You
Күн бұрын
@@prithwishroy tu bhimta hai tu ye phle bol deta toh sala main juban hi gandi nhi tum gadho se baat karke. Sala padha likha Kuchh hai nhi bas bakchodi karva lo, abe maine books aour Archeological report batayi hai social media ya random yt video ke tippa nhi. Pashupatinath seel , swasthik sign ke bare mei kuchh pta hai tujhe jo harrapan civilization mein mili. Shiv ki ab se nhi harrapan civilization ke samay se ho rhi hai.rakhigarhi ke dna report padhi hai kabhi . Aour kya Buddh budhh kar rha hai bhimte , according to leftist historian yadi Aryan bahar se aye to Buddh hain sikh bhi unhi se nikala huaa culture hai. Char yt video ke chaudhary Mat ban
@SajiSNairNair-tu9dk
4 ай бұрын
🙆👉🌞r p m?
@RodriguezRodrigo-dj3df
23 сағат бұрын
I don't why western people consider only South Indians as Indians.
@healer1000040
Ай бұрын
Actually, the minority people who came from Persia destroyed the Indus and Ghandahar civilizations, made a caste system and Dravianes slaves. They still rule India.
@Vdheeraj93
Ай бұрын
What's your scientific source?? Just plain non sense..
@rajadahir2066
Ай бұрын
Every single channel is pushing these Propaganda video.
@Gogetter-xc9ob
23 күн бұрын
What propaganda?
@akhandbharat8671
Ай бұрын
All western propaganda even though India has 10000 years of written history.
@npraneeth3
Ай бұрын
this guy is full of crap....
@UrvashiJhaveri-ik1ik
Ай бұрын
Totally false
@_titian.kronos_
Ай бұрын
False information ! Entire human race begun in Bharat !
@YTChannel344
Ай бұрын
What a load of rubbish research. Absolute disgraceful claims.
@natarangacreations
2 ай бұрын
Complete false story
@himynameiscat1795
2 ай бұрын
Why is it false ???
@kollurubharathsimha539
2 ай бұрын
@@himynameiscat1795becuase of sinauli finds which is same time line as Indus too but these guys got shields ,swords and battle charraiot . Bow and arrows etc . Dna related south indian . These guys say it's 1500 bce rigveda written . But rigved mentions Saraswathi river described the prime time of that . Initially they denied it's a myth but Google found dried river. As per archeologists of India it dried up at 1900 to 2100 bce .if they came to india it 1700 to 1500 bce then how can they describe about already dried up river 200 to 400 years like they have seen its prime .
@himynameiscat1795
2 ай бұрын
@@kollurubharathsimha539 but genetics and DNA says otherwise my friend.
@himynameiscat1795
2 ай бұрын
@@kollurubharathsimha539 indians are a mix of 3 ancient groups 1) AASI 2) Iranian hunter gatherers/farmers 3) Steppe Pastorolists
@zavahar
Ай бұрын
@@himynameiscat1795 He is trying to say that "Aryans" might have migrated way before the 1500 BCE. And that can be the reason these people saw Sarswati river in its peak time
@Anamika-if5fh
Ай бұрын
This indo aryan theory you are referring is very old and outdated😂its proved now that there never was any Aryan invasion and there are enough proof now that Indian subcontinent had a consistent inhabitants from at least 25000 yrs also the Vedas refer to a roaring river sarswati and its scientifically proven that the now not existed river sarswati was 8n her full form and roaring arround atleast 25000 yrs ago. Also the haplogroup R1A1 was found only in Indian subcontinent primarily which includes countries like India Pakistan Bangladesh afganistan Iran tibbet Nepal and some parts of china and eastern countries and it the actually the other way round that it was Indians migration to other countries due to various factors like invaders trade education travelling or internal conflicts etc. so stop this indo aryan invasion theory spread by westners who don't want to believe that some other race is superior to them by any means😂in fact the way every country in the world is finding statues artifacts of Hindu Sanatan religion it is definitely true that it as actually Hindu Indians who ruled the world in ancient times. There are many incidents narrated in Hindu Sanatan scriptures and even in valmiki ramayana where it is narrated that Hindus people or kings travelled far countries like America African countries middle East, eastern countries Russia China and ruled there.. the chola kings of South India ruled some parts of China almost all eastern countries and travelled for trade till Africa and middle East and European countries and there was a reference in a book of a European traveller writer that Indians ships were so big beautiful powerfull and had four floors that infront of them the European ships were like toys or cheap copy. And these ships were of chola kings who had very strong navy army with these giant massive ships. 😂also there are incidents mentioned in valmiki ramayan that sugreev sent his arms in search of Sita mata on four directions to varios countries giving exact details of nature of that country or trees rivers extra and the army he sent towards North went to countries matching the details exactly like USSR countries like Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Ukraine and the army went towards west went to America. And other European countries and there are stories that how some kings fight with their family and went to other countries and ruled there. There are many places in America Africa or European Iran Iraq etc where they have cities rivers kings name based on Indian names in Sanskrit of course they are prounced differently now like even Rome the capital of Italy is based in lord Ram's name and other cities too. Even Caspian sea name is based on sage Kashayap who went to that region from North India from the region of Himalayas. There are several Gods goddesses in Athens exactly like Hindu gods even have similar names. They have sun God exactly like Surya or sun God of Hindus. Even Romani prople are from western states of India most probably from Rajasthan or Gujarat.The list is endless. If care to read you will get clarity!
@sahilsingh6048
Ай бұрын
Aagye andhbhakts spamm karne
@andreamessiasgomes7118
Ай бұрын
Just an ignorant with no clue, yup that's what you are.
Пікірлер: 453