Ruling the world is not the objective. If it were, we would be the world empire and have everyone in chains. It's called the "Defense Department" for a reason, so that nobody threatens the US. This comes down to individuals, as we are all well armed and ready to use force to defend our property. You do you, but don't mess with me, that should be the motto.
@trentoncrew3985
Жыл бұрын
Lmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Sunset553
Жыл бұрын
sometimes I wish we could reduce the military budget to take care of some domestic problems, but it’s just my little dream.
@b.ballooon9225
Жыл бұрын
@@DylanE1 You seem to only know Anti-American propagandized version of events. 1. The US kicked ass in Korea, we didn't lose against North Korea, we just didn't want to lose millions to China. You ignore China's massive armies in that war. Despite that, Chinese troops took 3x more casualties than the US. Clearly in a total war, the US came out on top, we just didn't want to fight another total war after WW2 staright away just for South Korea, further, we had South Korea liberated, so we were willing to settle on a stalemate, unlike China, the US doesn't throw away its peoples lives so hapharzardly. Seriously, that's the reason the US "lost" Korea, it didn't lose, it had a stalemate, and only did so because despite taking out 3x more Chineses than Americans lost, it was clear the Chinese were willing to lose millions for Korea because They didn't care about their people, while America was not willing to lose that much for taking the North, as it already liberated the South, which was our requirement by alliance. Then you bring up the two LITERALLY hardest places to counter-insurgency and nation build on the Planet. Serioulsy, if this was a videogame, Vietnam and Afghanistan would be 5 stars, 5 skulls, Nightmare mode, Dark Souls with no HUD, You anti-Americasn and ignorant Isolationists (who seem to root against America at all times even if it means appeasing our enemies), you all seem to be extremely ignorant on Vietnam/Afghanistan, look at a map/population counter, and then you say "Hur hur America lost to some dumb farmers". no. They are not dumb farmers. They are the best guerillas on planet Earth. No question about it. Hardest to nation build. Do you know who else failed against them despite being much closer and much crueler? And they failed harder, losing far more troops. I'll tell you. Soviets against Afghanistan, they lost tens of thousands and despite being much cruler than the US (US did not target civies), Russia killed 2 million civilians, and STILL could not win. The US had ROE, and barely tried in terms of overwhelming force and bombing the same way it did in Vietnam or how Russia did in Afghanistan. Point is, the US was being nice in Afghanistan, we were trying not to piss off the world there, hence being so precise and careful. Vietnam was the US being mean as it could. But Afghanistan? The US was being nice, no matter what Muslims say, they are fools to think the US is a bigger threat to them for killing a few thousand during the 20 year long war on terror while China has a GENOCIDE ongoing against Muslims right now. America never put Muslims into camps. The US intervention in Afghanistan was one of the most precise, and was clearly an attempt to nation-build, not conquer, while Soviets just tried to annex Afghanistan basically as an SSR. US spent 20 years in Afghanistan but it was unorganized, Bush Jr. is an idiot, and relying on corporations to nation-build is even stupider, AL Gore would have democratized Afghanistan no mistake, and we wouldn't have been distracted by 2003 Iraq. So make no mistake, US could and would have won in Afghanistan, the hardest place to nation-build and counter-insurgency in the world, if it wasn't for our stupid leadership at the time. Onto Vietnam. Vietnam was a stupid war, US shouldn't have ever been there, we shouldn't have been there that long, and our leaders were greedy/evil. Sometimes I wonder if Kissinger, a German, was actually trying to sabotage the US as revenge for us defeating the n4zis. Something you are forgetting in your lame list of evidence as to why the US is weak. After WW2 the US could have easily annexed the world, we were the ONLY nation with nukes, everyone else wouldn't have stood a chance. So stop being silly and ignorant. Back to Vietnam. Vietnam was a travesty, horrible, and partially because of how cruel we were but also weren't able to use nukes (cause MAD) we were half-assing it in all directions. Personally I think we should have tried to actually do hearts and minds, but Kissinger and Nixon only cared about keeping the war going for war profits. But once again. Vietnam is nothing to scoff at. They are NOT just a bunch of farmers like your racist ignorant ass thinks they are. Do you know what Vietnam did to China? China has tried SO MANY times throughout history to conquer Vietnam. Ancient and modern. They pretty much failed every time and lost huge casualties, sometimes up 500,000 every time they tried. Do you understand that? China. RIGHT NEXT TO VIETNAM. Couldn't win after thousands of years of warfare and attempts to conquer Vietnam. CHINA IS RIGHT THERE. Historically they have been the strongest civilizaton on Earth until the British and Americans came on the scene. The strongest nation on Earth couldn't conquer Vietnam despite being RIGHT FUCKING NEXT TO IT. But you ignorant anti-Americans know nothing about history except the things that make America look bad don't you? Which is why you want to see Afghanistan and Vietnam as weaklings to make it seem like America is weak. Your whole arguement makes no sense. You look at war so simply, you don't seem to know the difference between Conventional War and Guerilla. Every nation sucks at fighting Guerillas, especially WHEN THEY ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WORLD. America doing as well as we did honestly deserves some praise for logistics for sure, as what we were trying to do is near impossible. You think that because America couldn't transform every aspect of Afghanistan life into a functioning rich secular democracy (A near impossible task) that we couldn't take on China or the other much weaker militaries? Are you joking? Do you understand the difference between Conventional and Guerilla warfare? Why would you compare Guerilla wars to the US's conventional capbility. The US is the best at counter-insurgency in the world, but it isn't our bread and butter, it isn't what the US dominated at in WW2, Korea, and has been preparing for ever since. The US's bread and butter is our conventional forces, our capability to beat any military. Just look at Gulf War. That will show you how dominant the US military is against Saddam's 4th strongest on Earth. Look at Korea, look at CCP troops taking 3x more casualties for every American. That's the best comparisons, CONVENTIONAL WARS, not guerilla, a ridiculous comparison only an armchair historian at best would do, but even an Armchair historian would know its a ridiculous comparison, so you are below an armchair, you're just brainwashed by a few cliff notes of history, like any Isolationist, SJW, or Russian/ Chinese citizen. I bet you are one of those. So yah, once again, please realize, the US failed at the hardest thing in the world that nobody else has ever succeeded at and when they tried they did much worse, in terms of their own casualties and civilian casualties. US lost like 2,000 in Afghanistan, acting like we did badly is insane. The US literally clobbered the Tali and Vietnamese in direct conventional combat. So you actually believing that our forces lost in pitched battle to these guys is hilarious. No it was hit and run, hearts and minds, hiding in caves. Any time any of these guys fought our guys directly they lost HARD. So what type of war would it be if we go to war with Russia and China? Iran (except the mountains)? North Korea? I'll tell you what type of war that would be. CONVENTIONAL. We would go in with tanks, air force, navy, and just like we did in WW2, we WOULD CRUSH THEM. US dominated in WW2, we weren't late, we were fighting them even before we joined the war Cold war style and once we joined (which was still early, because the others were late, location has to be taken into consideration when determining lateness to WW2, those who were closer to Germany/Japan had no excuse for being as late as they were, the US and American nations are so far away one could consider the US as earlier as it was a Eurasian war, and most Eurasian allies against the axis were late, some like the Soviets even made deals with the Axis, so my point is the US was early, everyone else was late despite the problem being right on their doorstep, US was early because the problem wasn't even on our doorstep, it was far away, yet we still decided to help the Allies before it came to our mainland, how honorable, yet all forget it and even claim we were late, how ungrateful of Eurasia). So yah, maybe learn more about the Korean War and learn more about how the US historically has ALWAYS dominated at Conventional Warfare. War of 1812 US did very well, Mexican-American war, WW1 the Brits/French were impressed with how the US did, and in WW2 we finally awakened into the massive anti-fascist anti-communist military juggernaut that protects the free world that you see today. WW2 was when America went Super Saiyan. Since then we've been on a different level militarily than most nations, and only lose the most unwinnable conflicts, which we try anyways because we are crazy ambitious and risk-taking. yet you anti-Americans use our need to try the hardest things (Like Vietnam/Afghanistan, which not even Russia/China could beat despite being right next to them), the US basically has constantly played life on hard-mode regarding our foreign policy because we don't back down from a challenge, you anti-Americans use that to your advantage by pretending our enemies were weak (They were not) and pretending losing when we are trying the most challenging things is evidence of us being weak. Nah, that's evidence of strength, trying games on hard-mode and losing is more powerful than not even trying hard-mode and playing on Novice mode like Russia/China does. They only pick on much weaker targets it seems. Like Tibet, Xinjiang, Chechnya, Ukraine, Georgia, Central Asia, and Taiwan. They are scared of real wars with major powers because they know they wouldn't stand a chance.
@b.ballooon9225
Жыл бұрын
@@DylanE1 TLDR: You basically got the wars that were almost impossible for anyone to win and used only those wars as evidence for America's inability to dominate globally if it wanted.....that's pretty sad. Why did you ignore all the wars that would be far more similar to WW3? Like WW1? WW2? Yugoslavia? Gulf War? Korea (You lied about Korea). Why? You igonre all the evidence that proves you wrong and only gave evidence that proves you right. Kinda lame if you ask me. Kinda manipulative and cliff notey. Lies of omission are still lies, so when you are arguing about America's military capability, you cannot just ignore all the conventional wars where America dominated (which is what WW3 would be, conventional), and then only bring up impossible guerilla wars that NOBODY has ever won ever? If America wasn't so ambitious, we would have gone after easier targets, we would have won, and then you wouldn't have any "failures" to talk about. But we choose the hard way, which actually makes us stronger/more experienced. America gained more experience fighting the impossible than any nation has in much easier wars. So yah, maybe the US didn't democratize Afghanistan, maybe anti-American losers like you now get to brag about Afghanistan every five seconds to make you feel better about your daddy Putin and Daddy Jinping, make you feel like their conquests are possible and America is going to lose (which only insane people who hate freedom and humanity want). But it's false hope, you literally are using America's practice (Afghanistan) as evidence for the US losing in real wars. THe US was pracificing in Afghanistan, it was testing ourselves against the hardest counter-insurgency. While every other nation would go after a weak target usually to showcase just how powerful they are, the US on the other hand went up against a super powerful target, the hardest to nation-build and counter-insurgent. So yah, that makes it easier for American haters like you to spread lies and misinformation about the US's capabilities due to your and others' ignorance on how war works. But those of us who know how war works, knows that the US was basically practicing in Afghanistan to learn how to deal with the toughest of toughest insurgencies, and at the same time this is just practice in guerilla wars. The US is already quite practiced at conventioanl. Basically nobody knows how to do guerilla. Some people know how to do conventioal, but America has prven the best at it. America has clearly attempted to learn the impossible and learn how to do counter-insurgency, I'm sure they learned a lot during Afghanistan and may use it in the future against easier targets to see rapid success. Yet you are using America's attempt to learn how to democratize nations, even the hardest one on Earth, Afghanistan, as evidence for our weakness???? No, that's evidence of our strenght. When we are so powerful that we can basically spend 20 years of war against a nation just to learn how to deal with guerilla wars, that's insane, that means we believe that we are good conventionally, and can now focus on training for the impossible. Like Goku after he mastered Super Saiyan he started training for hte next thing. So basically America mastered the type of warfare that would be involved with fighting the world, and we've spent the last 20 years trying to learn how to do something that the rest of you couldn't even dream of. I hope you wake out of your delusional way of thinking where you use America's toughest wars and wars that were not conventional and therefore not comparable to our capability at defeating the world's armies. I hope you realize that failing at something impossible is clearly an attempt to learn how to do the impossible, and only a nation with the most powerful military by a long shot could afford the public embarrassment of "Losing a war" to try something extremely difficult,(I mean as you proved, losers like you for decades will probably be trying to drag America's confidence down with Afghanistan, but your ignorance on how that war worked and how war works in general is blatant, sadly only people who understand military history will see that, dumb people will fall for your lies easy, as they always do, so many dumb people think the same way you do, I see Russian bots parrot it all the time, they think that because we lost Afghanistan, we would lose in Europe...no...lol...America has been preparing for the Soviet Empire to conquer Europe for decades now, Russia is way weaker, so we'd win for sure. China is the tough one, but we'd win in a total war at the end of it. Maybe the US couldn't conquer the entire world, but make no mistake, we could have been Imperialist with our superpower status if we wanted to, we choose to be the first superpower in history that doesn't conquer. We could have annexed huge swaths of Eurasia, Africa, and Latin America if it was our wish to do so, Russia/China would have, US is nice enough and cares enough about global peace, trade, and unification to not try to continue the cycle that all other superpowers did. Every superpower has tried to conquer the world, America hasn't, but since we are the strongest superpower in history, it is only logical to assume we'd be able to conquer even more than the British did. If you view Afghanistan in a vacuum, which you should, because it is very different from all other nations, except maybe Vietnam, then it becomes clear that the US actually dominated even in Afghanistan conventionally, and would do so anywhere else, the US has taken on major powers for a long time now and seems to always win. Whether it is British, French invading Mexico, Spanish Empire, German Empire twice, Japanese Empire, CCP Empire in Korea, and almost with the Soviet Empire and the US's containment did win the 1st cold war at the end of the day. Stop viewing wars in a vacuum and only presenting information that benefits your anti-American pro-Russian delusional mindset that encourages the US to back down and these losers to keep going. You're saying the same delusional things the Russians are saying right now, the same logic that has led to them underestimating the West and US, once again, just because the US ended up growing bored, losing interest, and leaving Afghanistan after 20 years of recking the Tali, and only leaving because they failed to nation-build a Muslim disorganized mountainous region into a modern democracy (Basically an IMPOSSIBLE task), doesn't really mean anything about their conventional, except that we had the time to do this and keep a large enough military to patrol the seas and contain Russia/Chinese Imperialisms.
@broken4096
Жыл бұрын
An all-volunteer force would never sign up for conquest. Look at any group through all of history that had even the slightest advantage on their neighbor, be it manpower or technology. An anomaly of history. Politicians, however, have other objectives.
@robertsmith4681
Жыл бұрын
It got that big because a lot of countries started relying on the US military for their defense against the Soviets after ww2 and once it got that big shrinking it back to "peacetime" levels is extremely hard.
@booroque4138
Жыл бұрын
No it’s shrunk,when my dad retired from the USAF in 1993 they had over 4300 fighter jets now they have around 2000 fighter jets I also remembered my dad being upset from all the base closings in the 1990s from the Clinton administration
@godoflightning5030
Жыл бұрын
@@booroque4138that’s because they get rid of the older planes and bases to upgrade them which costs a lot and takes time once a huge war starts with the US they will start popping them out more but for peace time there is no point while it’s constantly being upgrading it would waste resources that would be upgraded the next year because they made something better. You can see the negative of just producing and not focusing on upgrading in Russia most of there stuff is a lot older and malfunctioning or they would have already beat Ukraine.
@Beans-1111
Жыл бұрын
Wow that is just so amazing!!! Makes me feel so safe living in America!
@Beans-1111
Жыл бұрын
We here in America are good friends with India. There are a lot of Indians living in my city.
@michaelglover6219
Жыл бұрын
As an American. We don't rule the world, but like how we started. We want everyone to be free. As the freeist country, we are still fighting for our rights. For us and everyone on the planet
@kev792
Жыл бұрын
We're pretty free but we're not the most free country, lol. That title belongs to Switzerland, according to the Human Freedom Index.
@TerdFerguson1000
Жыл бұрын
@@kev792 you're kidding me right 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@TerdFerguson1000
Жыл бұрын
@@kev792 you're right but the same way they generated that is the same list that had Canada 6 and Austrailia 8 which is an absolute fucking joke 😅😅😅😅
@kev792
Жыл бұрын
@@TerdFerguson1000 How is it a joke? They list the criteria that they check and look for. They go through all the different types of freedoms for each country. I believe there are 12 types of freedom they measure. Edit: what’s your metric?
@kev792
Жыл бұрын
@@overused6632 Yep, the US is still a great country but a handful of countries are better
@Assassyn1980
Жыл бұрын
Marines are a branch of the Navy. Marines also protect the Commanders on each ship.
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
Жыл бұрын
Not to mention protecting the Commander in Chief, at The White House.
@Assassyn1980
Жыл бұрын
@@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 Indeed
@anthonyfuqua6988
Жыл бұрын
It's in Naval Dept but is own branch. I'm a Marine.
@anthonyfuqua6988
Жыл бұрын
No they are not. Marine Here.
@chrisdavis408
Жыл бұрын
Ww2 started it all. U.S. fought a war on 2 different fronts , pacific and the European theater. After that America looked at what happened in Europe and Asia and decided that will never happen on our soil. Thus , we went from isolationist to being very determined to defend ourselves and allies through strength and power projection. I'd say our allies benefitted greatly from that decision. Especially during the cold War. But that's my opinion. U tell me.
@miragowaikar98
2 ай бұрын
Indian American here. Honestly, it's an honor to be a citizen of the USA and an OCI of India. Two incredibly powerful nations.
@robbyrob0723
Жыл бұрын
Just to give you an idea of how it worked in WWII. The US Army fought WWII in Eorope against Hitler and the Marines which work hand and hand with the Navy fought WWII against Japan
@protonneutron9046
Жыл бұрын
they missed about 1/3 of the US Navy
@MRCATL3
11 ай бұрын
We love India. Forever friends
@douglascampbell9809
Жыл бұрын
It's not just the size and the technology involved. It's the amount of actual training. The US constantly trains it's military in real world situations. Lessons learned on the ground are almost immediately introduced into the training of new troops. It's the main reason the US military is considered a professional military. There are no conscripts, everyone volunteers. Many stay in the military for decades. I knew a Sgt Major in the Army who had 29 years in the Army and Army Reserve. My Father put in 23 years in the US Navy as a corpsman (medic) and left the service to be a physicians assistant.
@bierce716
Жыл бұрын
One of the most important, and most expensive, parts is that maintenance and training is constant. Russia has discovered in Ukraine what happens if you neglect those things
@Staxx0
Жыл бұрын
my dad was part of the Marine corps during the 1960s. he said they often said they were part of the navy or part of the army but really the Marines do their missions along with all parts of the military.
@deborahtoler3555
Жыл бұрын
I'm from U.S.A. and we have a lot more than what's in this video. We have 700 M-16 jet bomber's and more than 175 pilots to fly them, that doesn't count all the other jet bombers and doesn't count all the laser bomber's.
@clydedeloach9066
Жыл бұрын
Loud guys, you may want to also look at the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Space Force as well. Good job and thanks to you for your efforts to inform.
@snapoffmonkeybranch1242
Жыл бұрын
Yes, there are 6 Military Branches of the U.S. not 4.
@antichoice1
Жыл бұрын
11:17 I'm from the US and that question fascinates me as well. There were many factors, but the big thing is after WWII the US dollar became the world's currency , I think.
@anthonyhoskin-tu6mp
Жыл бұрын
But it also very great we have NATO to keep piece between the nations I'm also a big fan of India much love and Respect from USA
@michaelmcgowen8780
Жыл бұрын
In 1941, the United States had a small military, and we kept to ourselves to a great degree. Then Japan attacked our base in Hawaii at Pearl Harbor, four days later both Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini declared war on the U.S. We found ourselves fighting three major powers (Germany, Italy & Japan) at the same time in two different parts of the world (Europe/North Africa and the Pacific). Ever since, and especially due to the Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union, the United States has maintained a large military in order to fight two major wars in different parts of the world against multiple adversaries, just as we had to do during World War II.
@MidwesternCornbilly
Жыл бұрын
From a historical perspective, The U.S. Marine Corps was the primary fighting force in the Pacific Theater during WWII. The U.S. Army was also involved but it was the Marines that did the bulk of the island hopping fighting. Conversely, The U.S. Army did the the land fighting in Europe and Africa during WWII.
@MrBearTastic915
Жыл бұрын
as others have said america isnt out to rule the world but an abundance of preparation to respond to and deter attacks on us and our allies
@Seastallion
Жыл бұрын
It basically started with the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. At the end of WWII the US did not scale down to peace time operations, because as part of the Agreement the US agreed to protect the Global Shipping Routes, as well as the Allied Nations from foreign threats. In exchange, the Allies agreed to stand with the US against the Soviet Union. Brettonwoods was a Strategic Alliance, but resulted in Globalization which was the financial bribe to the Bretton Woods Allies. The US disadvantaged itself to purchase loyalty against the Soviets. Prior to that, the US was THE biggest manufacturer in the world, providing more than half of all war materials used during WWII, including 6 out of 7 barrels of oil. The US sacrificed much of its economic dynamism to the Global Order under Brettonwoods. It is a testament to the sheer scale of the American economy that it could lose so much and yet STILL remain the world's largest economy. It is only in recent years that the Bretton Woods Agreement is finally beginning to slowly become undone.
@an.american
Жыл бұрын
"There is nothing so likely to produce peace as to be well prepared to meet an enemy." *George Washington*
@johnwalsh9144
Жыл бұрын
The absolute primary objective of a fighting force so vast and capable is to act as a deterrent and help encourage new comers to the world stage that we will not accept a repeat of WW1 & WW2. Now America has been anything but perfect, but this is not a reflection of its military (at the time(s)) or its citizens, but of the political leaders of a particular era that made poor decisions and doubled down when things went badly instead of re assessing. The vast majority of American citizens would like to see peaceful relationships with everyone around the world but in reality, this is an unlikely outcome if we are being honest!
@vtown5630
Жыл бұрын
Forget the military 10 million civilians armed to the teeth 😁👌
@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb
Жыл бұрын
Way more then 10 million . 120 guns per 100 citizens
@ScorpoSangs-ud2os
Жыл бұрын
It takes us generations to do it but other countries trying to just simply mass produced it doesn't work like that, we Americans are committed and we will never give
@MrBallisticbob
Жыл бұрын
Remember my friends. If for some reason China, or any other country, would attack India, The US would be here to help you where needed. Just as Ukraine today as we are friends(allies).
@QwarkE1
Жыл бұрын
just remember us military is voluntary yes they are paid but they are not forced to serve
@tax905972
Жыл бұрын
Plus training. You can have more but you better have the training to use them.
@randieandjodistrom854
Жыл бұрын
I really enjoy the reactions from the "Loud Guys," but when the lovely young lady inadvertently said the "British" military in the intro rather than the US military, I both shuddered and laughed at the irony of how others may perceive the US and the historic British military as virtually synonymous, when the US fought vigorously against the British Crown for independence, and again in the War of 1812. Nonetheless, that is all in the past, and there is a very special relationship between the US and the UK, but it's not rooted in colonial pasts, but in shared values.
@ericsaldivar8235
Жыл бұрын
UNITED WE STAND'
@ScorpoSangs-ud2os
Жыл бұрын
They forgot to mention 10+ million patriots waiting cock and loaded, just in case military needs them
@douglascampbell9809
Жыл бұрын
Try more like 150+ million, the US has more guns in civilian hands than we have people.
@danettecrossley7912
Жыл бұрын
We are so big to protect our people and for our politicians to make money also you only know what they want you to know they don't tell everything it just sounds like they do God bless
@thumper7047
Жыл бұрын
Actually just # of personal, China is Number 1 with over 2 million, Then India with 1.4 million, then USA with 1.3 million. Russia has almost none left after last 2 years.
@Plastikdoom
Жыл бұрын
Yep, and who’s the most numerous, most well experienced and best equipped while being barley number 3 in numbers. But number one in the other fields? Plus globe spanning logistics? Simple answer.
@svenpedersen9140
5 ай бұрын
Yea, you a right about the personel thing... but what recent events have shown us is that with amunition, it doesn't matter how many people there is in an army 50 people with no amo will die against 5 well armed and unlimited ammo men. And of course the technology is even more of a fact when you can take out 100 men just with one strike (so no men lost on the attackers side). Only the weaker armies in the world are afraid about the number/population... just the sheer numbers mean super under/badly trained "personel" for the most part wich makes your army week actually.
@Jay2JayGaming
Жыл бұрын
There's this video, can't remember whose it was or what it was called, that asked the question "how many bases does the US military have exactly?" and the conclusions was: no one knows, not even the US Military
@badhabitbabbitt7655
Жыл бұрын
I'd say the USA decided to become the World Military leader shortly after WW2. Prior to that the military was extremely small and maintained an isolation foreign policy. With the Japanese attacks in Hawaii and Alaska, the enormous loss of life, and having minimal damage the USA went into major expansion, both in economic and military pursuits.
@brianr6651
Жыл бұрын
"Less than Russia and China" Idk maybe lets recount that Russia number since 2/21
@cecilybilbrey8024
10 ай бұрын
Namaste! Just FYI here. NATO, which the U.S. helped to start after WW2 has the U.S. under contract for lack of a better term to protect and support 150 countries out of 195 countries in the world That is just under 75% of the world we protect, that is part of why we have such a large force! Other countries do the same but not nearly as much as the U.S. In 2023 the U.S. gave 50 billion dollars to help other countries with their military, and humanitarian services. Please remember and note I as an American have no problem with this , but that money comes.from what Americans pay to the government in taxes. So the citizen of the U.S. technically paid that 50 billion and of course for all military services, that protect so many around the world. We look scary but you would too if you had so many depending on you! I hope you have a blessed day!
@flo4710
11 ай бұрын
❤ America is untouchable!❤
@dempseyvegeta1754
3 ай бұрын
Do a live video of you guys watching us military Weapons and your guys play all i spy pc all games and original i spy spooky mansion and I spy universe
@thumper7047
Жыл бұрын
I think he miss spoke on the Tanks. I think it's 6 thousand 2 hundred, not sixty two thousand. The US Marines are actually part of the US Navy. There is no such thing as The Department of the Marines. Back before "Direct Deposit" I would point out their checks say "Department of the Navy" when they denied it. The word "Marine" means "from water."
@fluffylittlebear
Жыл бұрын
The US decided to create an insurmountable military after WWII to assure that such a war never occurs again. That's also why the US spearheaded the creation of the European Union. So the US doesn't necessarily want to rule the world, but simply be powerful enough to ensure some level of world stability.
@flo4710
11 ай бұрын
❤ America is Great! Wow! I appreciate and Love my Country USA!!!🎉😮😂 Amazing! Whoooo!!😢 America is Awesome! Love it!❤
@a00141799
Жыл бұрын
You ask why the US seems to want to rule the world. Well on the economic front every country wants to be the richest and wealthiest. I'm sure India is working everyday to strengthen its economy and raise the standard of living for its citizens. And as far as the US wanting to dominate the world militarily was never the goal of the US. It was dragged into the two devastating world wars in Europe when it really wanted to stay out. However, the US' massive economy and industrial might allowed it to provide weapons to its allies was so vital in preventing a German and Japanese victory that we felt we had to send Americans to die in Europe in order to defeat the Nazi's. The US and its Marshall plan was instrumental in helping postwar Europe to rebuild their economies. Quite frankly Europe rarely seems able to resolve conflicts in on its own continent without the US through NATO providing leadership. The war in Bosnia was a clear example of this and so is the current war in Ukraine.
@tax905972
Жыл бұрын
Revolutionary war. Independence from the British.
@livingalaskanative3301
Жыл бұрын
World dominance. 🌎
@charlesachilefu
Жыл бұрын
The level of ignorance displayed in the video and in the comments is quite refreshing.
@DRAONWEED
Жыл бұрын
India should have nothing to worry about when it comes to the U.S. military because India has never started any fights, they will doggedly defend their land & citizens which are perfectly acceptable never shown any aggression to their neighbors. In other words, reasonably peaceful but not weak.
@Plastikdoom
Жыл бұрын
And this an old figure. Add 200 billion more USD, that’s what we spent 2 years ago. So we’ll over there 1/3 the worlds budget/defense. By a few percentage points.
@jaykay9034
Жыл бұрын
She still looks FINE!!!
@aidanwood9114
Жыл бұрын
This video is a little out dated. The US Marines no longer have tanks. I dont think the have Harriers anymore either though I could be wrong about that. The the US AirForce was never one of the original branches of the Military. Until the US AirForce was formed in 1947 it planes were flown by either the United States Army Air Corp or the US Navy
@RyanRichardsToby
Жыл бұрын
Why are you guys always on split-screen recently? I thought you were a couple. You used to be on the couch together.
@robertlewis1290
Жыл бұрын
It's NOT about America ruling the world.During World War Two Japan declared war on the United States and Germany made a huge mistake declaring war on the U.S. Imagine if we didn't have power projection that we did, the map of Europe and Asia would look very different than it does today. American military, paid for by American taxpayers, help to defend peoples of other nations. Maybe the US should become isolationist again and save the taxpayers the cost of defending other countries.
@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr
Жыл бұрын
Yeah but what US do if some idiots from Asia or Europe will start a World war again?
@americasfavoritebrazilian2399
Жыл бұрын
It would have looked better if you helped Germany and Japan. Now you built a Giant China
@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb
Жыл бұрын
@@americasfavoritebrazilian2399 we are not very afraid of china yet and they pissed us off now so we are currently cutting china off from tech trade and growing our navy to ww2 size
@TweezerShred
Жыл бұрын
Lol well where does my paycheck go. But us or china.
@jimmybobsap8729
Жыл бұрын
numbers mean nothing when rockets hit the troops in their sleep
@datospora5770
Жыл бұрын
beaut
@ScorpoSangs-ud2os
Жыл бұрын
Watch,,,, US defense global transportation system Cities at Sea US aircraft carrier
@1980bcman
Жыл бұрын
I think this video is off by a decimal point. We don't have 62,000 battle tanks and 39,000 armored personnel carriers. I think they met 6200 tanks and 3900 armored personnel carriers
@joefrench534
10 ай бұрын
Yeah what's up with the girl? Get in a fight? She does not want to be there.
@brandonmclean6108
Жыл бұрын
Lol, Team America World Police was a joke. But in reality it's true. Since WWII America has been in 100's of wars, many we still fight today. Not just for our safety, but those who want to be free. America has many flaws, but generally care about others.
@Mike-r1y2g
Ай бұрын
Are you OK? Do you need some help
@Navybrat64
Жыл бұрын
Americans give our tax dollars and it is spent on our military so we can help protect the world. We're the only country able to do it. The USA is home to the world. We're not perfect but, we try to do our best and what's right.
@tindikukka
Жыл бұрын
Well, USA is ok but I'm lucky that I don't live there. It's not home of the world, so many things are better elsewhere.
@robertlewis1290
Жыл бұрын
We are the only country that can bomb you and feed you right after!
@americasfavoritebrazilian2399
Жыл бұрын
Protect the world? You left your people in Afghanistan with 50 billion in equipment. Now low on ammunition😢
@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb
Жыл бұрын
@@americasfavoritebrazilian2399 we are not low on ammunition. We are helping Ukraine but we are not digging into our reserves. We are running low on old stocks from the 90s
@tindikukka
Жыл бұрын
@@americasfavoritebrazilian2399 US army protects the interests of their 1% who have 99% of the money in there. That's why they don’t go in places where there is no economical benefits to exploit. That's why there is no logic from humanitary point of view how USA interferes. Now USA complains about war crimes of Russia while USA itself helps Saudi-Arabia to do those in Yemen. It's quite tragic to see how democracy is used as disguise for greed, which is real motor running the USA.
@loneranger668
Жыл бұрын
The U.S. Military video seems to bother the young lady. It looks that she has somewhat of a distaste for the American military.
@kiaayo33
Жыл бұрын
Coming from an American India would most likely beat the living hell out of America if we went to war! weaponry can only get America so far but population matters way more. Let's just be friends 😁 That's why Ukraine hasn't beaten Russia yet, Ukraine has the weaponry but Russia has Way more people than Ukraine. Slava Ukraini!🇺🇦
@douglascampbell9809
Жыл бұрын
Depends on the type of war. In a scorched earth the US doesn't care to hold land India would lose.
@anthonyfuqua6988
Жыл бұрын
Cant hear her
@mega00760
Жыл бұрын
more important is how big is Bidens brain
@davidritchie1658
Жыл бұрын
I tell you who not mess russia
@Vee-vq3fn
Жыл бұрын
Second comment lol
@turtlemommee
Жыл бұрын
First comment
@seancox46
Жыл бұрын
That's the best you had to say? 😂❤😊
@americasfavoritebrazilian2399
Жыл бұрын
The U.S military is now weaker then ever. They recruit boys dressed in makeup💄😅
@mr.anderson6040
Жыл бұрын
They are bigger and stronger
@mr.anderson6040
Жыл бұрын
And our tanks actually work
@mr.anderson6040
Жыл бұрын
Nope, a single US soldier. Can't take on 4 or 5 of You that is well known
@mr.anderson6040
Жыл бұрын
Taller stronger bigger if you don't like it too bad
Пікірлер: 138