In this video, I am sharing how you can install input shaper with accelerometer to perform an auto-tune of your printer. -Accelerometer: ADXL345 www.amazon.com... -Instructions: www.klipper3d....
"I've also added wall anchors" ...lol. You know you mean business when the building is part of the machine! I'm not trying to sound pretentious or condescending, but you asked for expertise in the area of vibration analysis and I don't know your level so I'll try to simplify it, but you've already shown to graps a lot of it. This is a long one, but I hope this can help you: Vibrations are the remaining energy in the structure following a change of force/impulse/"sudden acceleration". That energy is constantly exchanged between two forms:potential (elastic, stretching/bending of the structure members and the belt) and kinetic (moving of the components). The spring stretches, accelerate the mass, the moving mass in turns pulls on the spring while slowing down, then the spring accelerate the mass in the other direction etc. Knowing this, you can imagine all parts in your system as springs and masses. For example, your belt is slightly elastic and your head has a mass. The beams (like your 10mm rods) are also elastic, even if very rigid, and the platen is a mass. So is the extruded aluminum frame.... The frequency of the vibration is going to increase with the increase of rigidity and the reduction of the mass (and vice-versa) This is what you are doing by lowering the mass of the head and increasing its rigidity (adding carbon fiber beam, Stretching of the belt, clamping to the wall, changing rods for thick rails ...) Increasing the resonant frequencies might just seem futile at first glance, but it isn't once we consider the energies. At high frequency, the system being more rigid, the amplitude of the vibration is going to be smaller for the same excitation energy (not counting excitation at resonant frequency (ringing ... we'll get to that). The reason is that energy = force X displacement. When you are rigid, the force increase and displacement decrease. Lower amplitude = better prints. Duh! The other thing at high frequency is that everything can become a damper. The goal of a damper is to absorb the energy to stop the rigging. The rubber wheels on your platter is an example of a viscoelastic damper (i.e. it damps when you stretch). Rubber dissipates a lot of heat when deformed. At higher frequency, the forces can be enough to create friction between parts and structures screwed together. Friction is a form of dynamic damper (i.e. it damps when you move) You also cycle between both elastic and kinetic more often, so the energy can get absorbed over a shorter amount of time. Which leads to ringing (or resonant frequency). This happens when the force/impulse/sudden acceleration is done at or close to the frequency of the oscillation, pumping it more and more.This means that once excited at that frequency, the oscillation can last much longer or even increase in amplitude.( Think Tacoma narrow bridge. ) From the graph that you showed this is the frequency of the pic. To combat this, you only have two options: More damping ... for example when your belt was looser, the pic was wider (2nd pic) but lower amplitude. A looser belt can deform more leading to more viscoelastic damping. So your results makes sense. The other thing to do is to anticipate that amplitude and actively absorb it by driving the motors in exact opposition to the expected force. This is a "very simplified (and incomplete)" explanation of the what the Shaper software does. In conclusion, if you didn't have the shaper software, I would probably go with the looser belt and possibly use a few rubber pads on the beams to damp vibrations. With the shapper software, I'm not sure if it is extensive enough to deal with wider(2nd) frequency pics so you're probably safer at your higher tension ... at the cost of the belt life duration... but that doesn't seems to be the goal. Good luck!
@slayyou
3 жыл бұрын
HI Et I have had a few questions for you since you seem to know what you are talking about. 1. Is there value to maximizing the non-moving mass and rigidity of the frame. and then completely coupling it to the (table) using some form of spring dampener? 2. is it perhaps time to leave behind the steppers and move to linear motors? reason being the complete removal of belts and their accompanying spring behaviour. 3. could a tuned counterweight, driven in the opposite directions of travel by its own motor help with the reduction of g forces on the frame? Thanks in advance!
@seb3d
3 жыл бұрын
4. Could vibration dampening of the belt be beneficial? Kind of what they do with tennis rackets. And thanks for the info, very good read!
@Graham_Wideman
3 жыл бұрын
@@slayyou What's an LMU?
@gentiligiuliano7882
3 жыл бұрын
I've seen some printer years ago that had an additional xy axes with just a mass to counterbalance the other mass ot he extruder mooving just opposite/specular direction (Or at least it's what I understood). They claimed this system was super effective to reduce vibrations. Should it be any good solution to increase even more fastness in such kind of system with input shaper?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Wow man you know this way better than I do. Thanks for takinkg the time to explain
@nraynaud
3 жыл бұрын
for people interested in dynamics and control, adding mass and stiffness increases the resonant frequency (the mass thing is unintuitive, but it's the stationary mass that we increase, so the ratio moving mass/stationary mass becomes very small, and small masses can't move the big onde easily). The general rule of robotics is to have as high a resonant frequency you can get and never go there in practice. If you really can't stay lower than the resonant frequency, you try to generate as little of it as possible by your commands. Input shaping is shaping the spectrum generated at the input to the robot, trying to skip the forbidden. The trick is that you can't really avoid the forbidden place, because any fast acceleration or braking generates a train of frequencies multiples of each other, there is a point where one of those frequencies will pass over the forbidden place. That's why you can try to do your best with input shaping but your next step is to stop using sharp corner everywhere, and start optimising you toolpath.
@soundmindtv2911
3 жыл бұрын
I love that you’re focusing on creating QUALITY prints fast. Your machine is a great step in machine engineering for competition level performance that can then translate practically to improved reliable manufacturing applications.
@benanderson8294
3 жыл бұрын
Nice work! You are really pushing speed and quality
@Novacat170
3 жыл бұрын
Hi vez. Up to my knowledge in nvh what you see when going from low tension Freq cases to the high ones is that the belts when untensioned separate "structures" and therefore masses that are vibrating at that frequency. When you tightened it you made the more flexible one, more rigid and the more rigid, mostly more heavy. Resulting in an intermediate resonance frequency but with a higher mass participation ( how much of your overall system is vibrating at that frequency). This is a complicated theme as the test is mixing dynamic and cinematic actions ( the test is not shaking the hole printer, the head moves so belt lengths to the sides change and therefore rigidity and so their natural modes, even though they seem really small movements and change may be negligible). Loved the video. I envy your beautiful printer. If you have any doubt about nvh don't hesitate to ask and I'll try to answer. See you.
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Interesting. Thanks for answering
@Novacat170
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D you're welcome to ask 😄
@jamespray
3 жыл бұрын
Super interesting! The belt tension question might be more complex than just what the motors transmit to the head; the more you tighten the belts, the more force they exert on every pulley they go around, so they're also effectively tightening your frame. The amplitude of your peak might be increasing with tension just because the tension is also increasing your frame's rigidity? It makes me curious to explore the benefits of soft-mounting weights to a printer frame to attack both the amplitude and decay rate of vibrations around the peak.
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
That coule be a good explanation
@etle113
3 жыл бұрын
Belts also have a non-linear rigidity. Initially, part of the "springiness" is given by the rubber. Once stretched, the embedded fibers start to dominate the rigidity and they're a lot more rigid than rubber. I also tend to think that adding strategic dampers might help. Like he did with the wheels on the platter. But I don't see a lot more places where It could be done without impeding on functionality. At this point, I think that most of the ringing comes from the belts and head. So we basically want to damp the movement of the head and bridge, but if we damp it too much the speed and motors will suffer. I have seen a solution to this problem before, but I've never done it. There are some special grease out there that are shear thinning. In other words. They are thick and viscous when you go slow and thin and liquid when you go fast. So the ringing would be damped when the head is at low speed, but its not going to impede at high speed... I wouldn't know what to use or even how to choose such grease tho
@picassoimpaler3243
3 жыл бұрын
James Pray By increasing the rigidity, it should increase the frequency of the resonance. Since the main resonance didnt move what so ever, but just increased in amplitude, the main peak seems to be separate from the belt tension. The second peak does seem to increase in frequency somewhat with belt tension, that is most likely the belts resonance. Every part has a resonance though, so because the main peak resonance increased in amplitude with tighter belts it seems like the belts were helping damp it somewhat.
@jamespray
3 жыл бұрын
@@picassoimpaler3243 The damping idea does sound plausible. I wonder if the increasing belt tension was also possibly moving the resonant frequency of other parts of the machine into the same range so they overlapped. Another thought: as the vibrating portions of the belts have multiple lengths between different parts (e.g., pulleys) of the machine, I would not expect their individual resonances to produce a strong single peak -- consider that for any given movement of the print head, many of those lengths would change.
@picassoimpaler3243
3 жыл бұрын
@@jamespray my assumption for the main peak is that it would be the aluminum extrusions that hold the linear rails holding the CF tube. Since the test was run with the CF x axis tube being smack dab in the middle of those extrusions, it is a recipe for them to resonate with the x axis movement of the print head. I would suggest he try the test again with the y axis closer to either end, that should change that resonance if that is the culprit.
@YouMakeTech
3 жыл бұрын
Respects, you are really pushing the boundaries of 3d printing. So interesting! Thanks for sharing and keep up the good work!
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
thanks for the kind words. If I can help the community, that makes me happy :) because community has helped me a lot since I started 3D printing. Lots of nice people in this world
@detlefschrempf5387
3 жыл бұрын
How about splitting the extruder in two parts? One part is the drive with the ventilators for cooling and so on and the other part is only the nozzle with the heater and the heatsink. The first part will be on a separate gantry and follows the movement of the nozzle. You would just need an elastic connection between the part 1 and 2 to decouple both from each other. The reason to do that would be to have the oscillating movements that lead to ringing in the heavy part of the extruder drive. The actual printing part of the extruder, which is followed, by the drive part will have much less weight to it and ringing could further be reduced. Just a thought I had. Would make it more expensive though but if speed is what you are going for....
@callardo1
3 жыл бұрын
Search for "deckingman" he's got a corexyuvab printer, his setup is as you described with an additional counter weight moving in the opposite direction. He's using 6 inputs tho.
@detlefschrempf5387
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the tip! I will look at it.
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
@@callardo1 man thats a way cool printer hes got there. Very complex design.
@seb3d
3 жыл бұрын
Great video, keep it up, looks like you are onto something!
@winandd8649
2 жыл бұрын
@3:46 Look a bit like my printer there 😎, only I use (one per corner) V-wheels, so the V of the wheel rides on the edge of the extrusion in a 45 degree angle. These 4 wheels in the corners are the only thing guiding my bed, and it's rock stable! What's moving the Z-axis? 4 acme lead screws (8mm lead), connected together with a GT2 belt at the underside of the printer, powered by one nema17 stepper. The motor has no troubles moving the bed whatsoever.
@atomatopia1
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if filling the chamber with higher density gas would help translate vibration as well as dampen/absorb it in the friction between gas particles. Haven’t found any research into it but it might have interesting results(?)
@atomatopia1
3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps this may increase your fluid friction on the moving parts and perhaps negate the vibration dissipation a little, but still a potential variable to be tuned
@REDxFROG
3 жыл бұрын
That's sweet! My printers are placed on stone plates which are laying on foam. So theoretically if I wanted to do this, I think I would have to use 3 sensors. X and Y and one sitting on the stone plate itself to compensate for the movement of the printer as a whole. (But I guess the software wasn't designed for doing this) That's why without a wall mount, the test wasn't super perfect. The printer still had movement. Due to the noise I wouldn't want to do this. My printers are slow and dead silent in server enclosures. Slow but still produce ringing at like 60mm/s. Like the Prusa mk3s+. It's so bad🥳
@slayyou
3 жыл бұрын
I have my printers set up the same way, with the addition of a petg spring to allow the mass of the printer more travel while reacting to forces. Input shaper still seems to improve things in our situation. I tuned mine manually though.
@reasonsvoice8554
3 жыл бұрын
Well im back got the sensors klippers installed and working almost ready to install and test the adxl345
@createforcuriosity225
3 жыл бұрын
Great ! keep it going, you did really nice videos, and this one is very usefull
@ModPhreak
3 жыл бұрын
I'm really new to 3d printing and just got a prusa mk3s+; found tightening the belts (more than I first thought was nessesary) helped with reducing ringing. I can tell the speed creates a lot of stringing, but for my mostly functional prints that might be very acceptable for a substantial increase in speed. Has someone at Prusa looked into using this sensor as well? Oh and I'm a bass player and the tutorials I could find mentioned it should sound like a bass string. Well that is actually 60Hz and what it should sound more like is a guitar string. Just thought I would mention that as well.
@Rocan0
3 жыл бұрын
We are all talking about mass and springs and damping, but what about friction. I'm thinking of the effect of R in an RLC circuit. It would make the steppers works a bit more, but the springiness of the belts could just disappear if added properly. By properly I mean a way of creating friction without too much difference between stationnary and dynamic friction, without too much wearing and with the least play possible in the mounting of the device.
@haenselundgretel654
3 жыл бұрын
Actually acceleration is causing vibration. Acc. times mass equals force. And vibrations are countering forces when accelerating/decelerating a certain mass.
@Eluderatnight
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if increasing the mass of the frame would help. Sand filled steel square tube welded and braced with gussets.
@jimbob1er
2 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to put two accelerometer?: one for the print head and one for the print bed, to check the difference between the two. Currently the accelerometer on the print head use earth as reference, but if the printer frame and bed also move (vibrate) relative to that reference, the input shaper ignores it. I think it would be relevant to check the difference between the material deposition side and the reception side because the real defects on the part is a result of theses two components.
@M1America
3 жыл бұрын
Was that printer a tronxy x5s in a previous life? Im currently upgrading my x5s and am looking for a linear rail retrofit kit. The existing solutions on thingiverse have the rails on the outside of the extrusion and the structure reaching around over the belts and then mounted to the x axis. Seems like it is throwing away stiffness for no reason. I like your gantry better.
@pjak2000
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome work - but the bed is still suspended on the springs that have poor lateral stiffness. Why add pom wheels when there is freedom on the compressed springs?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Thats one thing I will address soon :)
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Also ..as you can..i have added a nut so the spring is more compressed. But still needs a better fix
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Also.. it was the whole bed frame that was shaky. So the wheels have helped. The print surface itself is not that shaky but still could be improved
@AndreySemjonov
3 жыл бұрын
Maybe using silicone standoff better in that case than springs?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Ill find something
@user-yk1cw8im4h
2 жыл бұрын
what does the probe point section in the config do? I don't have it set up but it seems to work? But my result doesn't make my print quality better for the tower test
@michaeld954
3 жыл бұрын
Can i just buy one off you tuned and ready to go
@laszloszell8753
3 жыл бұрын
First of all you need a welded frame ,because this 1000 screw holding together aluminium frame a pice of kako. All lathe,cnc machine need a solid block do as for 3d printer.
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Next build
@laszloszell8753
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D You definitely need it,if the weight no problem then you can use 40x40x2mm iron profil. The bed linear guide this also not really good ,even if you buy 20mm round bars. You have to use HGR15 or 20 linear rail at each side. At the Y axis you could use only linear rail if you turn it 95° (flip at side),so in this way cannot bend and dont have to use the square carbon fiber tube. You could use also Bowden extruder so only the hotend and the air blower would stay at the y axis,but you need a really tight tube for the 1,7mm filament,otherwise you will take out all your hair while solve all the over and under extruder problems.
@meneeringenieur1866
3 жыл бұрын
is this only meant for Corexy printers? or can Cartesian printers also benefit from it?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Any printer yes
@erikmcclain3703
3 жыл бұрын
Is your printer completely custom or did you start with something?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Started as a x5s... and kept the frame and bed assembly
@rushmore1305
3 жыл бұрын
Could you share some info on the frame of this machine? Is it available for public to build? What size carbon square tube is that
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
frame is 2020 and 2040. The square tube 2020/18id
@rushmore1305
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D do u have design files you would willing to share
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
@@rushmore1305 yes next week
@wormball
3 жыл бұрын
Why is the blurred rectangle there? As we see slightly later, there is nothing to censor beneath it, but it steals all the viewer's attention.
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Wait... What? This is a bug. It was not there before. KZitem did something ...I'll try to fix it
@ckafrouni
3 жыл бұрын
Are those mgn9 rails?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
only on the X... Ys are MGN12
@cardosodouglas
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D do you plan to share your printer project?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
@@cardosodouglas sure thing
@cardosodouglas
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D i'm modding a X5SA as well, your printer has all the parts i already have on hand, please let us know when you upload the project files. your videos are really awesome, you're really pushing the limits with everything you've done. That gantry with the square carbon tube is gorgeous
@reasonsvoice8554
3 жыл бұрын
Also noticed there was a 9 axis sensor but dont know if that would be supported
@banknote501
3 жыл бұрын
The other axis are rotational. You shouldn't need that in a printer, head should not rotate. But maybe worth a try to see how stiff the construction really is.
@reasonsvoice8554
3 жыл бұрын
@@banknote501 that was my thoughts way above and beyond whats required But also as you said i think it could possibly reveal some interesting information on how stable setup is etc
@glengroenendaels4229
3 жыл бұрын
Salut a toi , ton analyseur de spectre pour tendre les courroies pourrait être un bonne outils pour tendre toutes nos courroies de la même façon pourrais tu nous présenter ton application ?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Chaque printer est different et aura des mesure differentes. Et meme le meme printer avec 2 type de courroie differente aura des mesure differente. Alors on ne peut pas appliquer mes mesures a d'autre printer. C'est plus un analyse technique pour sois meme.. et au aussi pour sassurer que les 2 coté ont la meme tension
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Sur le playstore... go look spectrum analyzer
@glengroenendaels4229
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D donc pour l'accéléromètre sa ne sert en générale que 1 fois lorsque ont règles les courroies sa ne prend pas de calcule tout le temps et une fois que ont connait la quel tension ont doit donner a nos courroie ont en as plus besoin ?
@rumu3f431
3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@rayge
3 жыл бұрын
Where do you get the stuff to make the cables?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
I used a cat5e cable i had laying arround. And used dupont connectors and a crimper
@rayge
3 жыл бұрын
@@Vez3D well that's an easy way to do it! I have like 300 ft of cat 5.
@robertwood3970
3 жыл бұрын
You could decrease the weight of the extruder even more by using a Flex3drive.
@banknote501
3 жыл бұрын
FlexDrive introduces artifacts by being itself a bit springy.
@robertwood3970
3 жыл бұрын
@@banknote501 If I can print a 500mm per second I can live with some artifacts.
@banknote501
3 жыл бұрын
@@robertwood3970 Yes, there are always some trade offs.
@iamducatti2276
3 жыл бұрын
Can you give me more information for your extruded?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
You mean extrudort? Look for the hevort hextrudort on google
@Andre-kf8vp
2 жыл бұрын
This broke my Klipper. Now it does not connect anymore. Got errors while following the instructions. Python too old.
@mnrobards
3 жыл бұрын
And the bed is on springs.......
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Very stiff spring though lol. And now with a the mods, its quit rigid. But yeah.. something i need to address
@josefjosef1524
2 жыл бұрын
Doing my phd in input shaping lol
@digibluh
3 жыл бұрын
nothing wrong with the frame moving as long as the whole machine is moving with it... otherwise stiffening the machine just transfers the energy elsewhere, like belts or extruder since it hangs low... if they can handle it.... the energy must be absorbed somewhere.
@evolutionairarms6559
2 жыл бұрын
a lot of waffling i got to 14 plus minutes and we hadn't done anything, sorry man i got bored!
@jc84com
2 жыл бұрын
I would like to see a follow up video to this 2021 video As Klipper added the ADXL345 kinematics tutorial in Jan 2021 and your fantastic video a few months later. A More detailed explanation on how to read and understand the output graphs and what they mean. This was by far the best video on Input Shaping and how to somewhat interoperate the graphs with BeltTensions and Ridgid machine. MZV EI 2HUMP 3HUMP Hertz Power Spectrial Density, Ideal vibrations tolerances. and what to aim for.
@GoldenJaguar3D
3 жыл бұрын
also acceleration is still limited base on the type of input shaper selected as it can get very aggressive with smoothening the prints too much.
@FilmFactry
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, really want to learn this. Not much good info out there.
@espadon315
2 жыл бұрын
Is it still best option for ringing?
@IslandSpark
3 жыл бұрын
how did you fasten your rail to the carbon gantry?
@csenior10
2 жыл бұрын
I don’t quite understand things like these so trying to wrap my head around what it is I’m doing and why I’m doing it was a foreign language to me. I basically need to be talked to like a 5 yo about this stuff. 😂 I have scoured the internet and all of KZitem and I couldn’t find anything that explained it and didn’t leave me more confused than before I started. Until I came across yours. I’m still a little unsure about a few things but I think your video has steered me in the right direction. I now know a bit more and think I can start making some sense about it. I think there needs to be more videos and instructional content that really go into depth about each section. Especially when it comes to tuning. Not many people know about the capabilities of their machines. Especially when it comes to Klipper. I went with Klipper because it made so much more sense (at first) than Marlin but most of the content on Klipper assumes you know how to code and speak 5 different computer languages once you get into the tuning process. I just want to understand how it all works so I know what I’m doing without having to get a computer science degree. I think this is where your videos shine. Maybe So thank you for putting in the time to make this and share with the world.
@JamieHarveyJr
2 жыл бұрын
Your belt tension appears to be directly affecting the damping of the system. Increasing damping reduces the peak response but widens the response range. Decreasing damping increases the peak response but narrows the response range. Seems inline with your observed data. I’d assume it’s easier for input shaper to manage a narrow spike than it is to have to handle a wide range of frequencies. Even if the narrow spike has more intensity.
@picassoimpaler3243
3 жыл бұрын
going to throw something at the wall to see if it sticks regarding the belt data you gathered. Based on the way resonances typically act, the stiffer you make an object, the higher in frequency the resonance occurs. Looking at the data it appears that the secondary peak is the belt resonance. As the belt gets tighter, that secondary resonance moves up in hz as it should, but it is also loosing amplitude because it is stiffer. Because of that it leads to a smoother curve. On the other hand, because the belt is tighter, it doesnt help damp the main resonance that is occuring around 80 hz there. Thus making that vibration a higher amplitude. That leads me to believe that the ~80hz resonance is something other than the belt. Perhaps that is the resonance of the pair of aluminum extrusions holding your moving arm. Since you ran this test right in the middle of the extrusions, that would be the prefect place to excite that resonance, I would retest with the arm all the way up or down the y axis to see if that changes the result. This is very similar to vibration of speakers and their environments which i am used to. So i would imagine it would be very similar in principal
@GoldenJaguar3D
3 жыл бұрын
you can use shaper calibrate and it will do x an y and automatically recommend a shaper for each axis in the terminal just hit save config and it will set it in your config
@adamflight1
3 жыл бұрын
I'm just looking at purchasing my first printer. Your videos are really helping me to decide where I want to go with this as a hobby and eventually as a money-making tool. Thank you so much, I can't wait to someday make one of these beautiful machines.
@jvdp33
3 жыл бұрын
Great video! You are an inspiration to a lot of us. when I watched the part where you attached the cable I was aware of one thing, hear me out it might improve your results even more. The cable that connects to the sensor will also affect the resonance, since it is a mass (and stiffness + damper). I know it seems very little but I think it will be enough to influence the results. It would be best if it runs together with the other cables, perhaps even permanently. This might be difficult since obviously you don't want to run the cable with your other cables due to noise... Alternatively you can get a thinner cable to reduce the effect that the cable has on the measurement. Not sure if it would help but maybe you can make another measurement somehow?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
yeah.. I should zip tie it to the print head
@chrismorrison9140
2 жыл бұрын
More to Jvdp's point, you need to consider that about 1/2 of the weight of the cable is carried by the print head. Same for your cable chain with it's cable. Plus they act as a spring. The lightest and least resistant to motion cable is the flat flexible cable FFC. Maybe another video on that with before and after would be cool? Nobody else has done one.
@giulianofrassineti2717
Жыл бұрын
GH Enterprise has therefore found a solution that allows you to add Input Shaping to 3D printers in a simple and immediate way, avoiding the use of external host cards such as RPI4. Just replace the X and Y axis drivers with the GH Smart Shaper drivers, add some configuration commands to your g-code and you are ready to print with input shaping.
@lisacesco1982
Жыл бұрын
everything looks solid apart from the main thing "the bed" havnt you thought of putting it on spacers and using a probe to level the bed.sorry i just cant understand why youve done all that work to make printer solid and then left the bed on springs
@JoshW1ck
2 жыл бұрын
3v and neutral are wrong in that wiring diagram, vcc should go next to the sda pin not the other way round
@ameliabuns4058
3 жыл бұрын
input shaper messes my dimensions D:
@gold-junge91
3 жыл бұрын
Have you screw your printer to the wall ? 🤣
@toastytheog
11 ай бұрын
2 years later and 60k isnt a typo anymore
@ThantiK
3 жыл бұрын
POM/Acetal/Delrin
@shahriarjalilian
2 жыл бұрын
Awesome!!!
@sar2908
3 жыл бұрын
Talking about dealing with vibrations. I imagine the belts teeth on the X axis, running on the edge of your bearing setup (at high speeds) would cause a fair amount of vibration. Would changing the belt pulley wheels from bearings to toothed wheels (similar to the drive wheels on the stepper motors) help smooth things along?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
I dont know. Ill have to try someday
@TheObviousEspionage
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, i had terrible ringing on my printer from those non-toothed pulleys until i switched them out for toothed pulleys.
@H엑티브
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheObviousEspionage ...
@Andre-kf8vp
2 жыл бұрын
😭
@opensourceeducated2862
2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Always glad to find another maker sharing his research & troubleshooting. I'm trying to learn how to convert my ender 3 v2 to run klipper so I can overhaul my works printers. When I finally heard about the .config file for editing firmware it was the tipping point + the sophisticated features for figuring out this massive undertaking (for my A&P educational background). Thank you for putting in the time and sharing!
@lowfat32
3 жыл бұрын
Where did you get that carbon fibre tube?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Aliexpress
@massonmilo5754
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent setting! I'll take that after build up my Voron printer. By the way, did you ever plan to open source your printer some day? I am really interesting about it.
@AM-jw1lo
3 жыл бұрын
I can't see a great difference. Maybe quit the 4 modes, print more of the best and worst and show a model of something where it justifies its use.
@netmaster78
3 жыл бұрын
is that a modified X5SA?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Almost !! Its a X5S hehe .. you sir have good eyes
@reasonsvoice8554
3 жыл бұрын
Just looked up the accelerometer board you need 🤔 £1 sod it ordered Not even played with klipper at all yet but its gonna happen 😂
@daveks21
2 жыл бұрын
Hi can I get a copy of you wall mounts
@Vez3D
2 жыл бұрын
Oufff.. this is old and I dont tink i have this anywhere now sorry
@patricknellis1296
3 жыл бұрын
Super de bonne idée!!! Sa me donne des idée aussi pour la mienne( Tronxy 400) qui ne pourra pas accoter la tienne Ahahah!!
@fabiuh991
3 жыл бұрын
Add sticky rubber pads to the acrylic centres
@mathieuxxx9121
3 жыл бұрын
Great video! have you shared your tronxy mod somewhere?
@forbiddenera
3 жыл бұрын
What printer is this? Custom? Plans anywhere? I like the size and want to build a new one..
@wage4598
3 жыл бұрын
I believe less weight leads to more vibrations because larger weights will absorb them
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
Thats true for some area. Not for moving mass. Moving mass will create vibration
@alexandereckhardt7153
3 жыл бұрын
do you even need the carbon square tube, wouldn't the linear rail be rigid enough?
@Vez3D
3 жыл бұрын
They are springy a bit.
@patrickmaartense7772
3 жыл бұрын
hope you did not pay the amazon price: costs < 1 $ on ali
Пікірлер: 138