Fun fact: the camera was actually able to record in color and high resolution. This is actually the way it looked in the USSR back then.
@fincestoloras
10 күн бұрын
They did have Colored cameras it just wasn't used here In fact ussr pioneered in photo lenses back is 10s and 30s nobody really rival them Soviet lenses are even today extremely expensive and famous for quality
@DanY-mj4gl
9 күн бұрын
@@fincestoloras It was a joke
@andrewcavenagh9016
Жыл бұрын
The HBO depiction of him was certainly distorted. Although a strict authoritarian, by all accounts he was not the foul-mouthed tyrannical bully that Paul Ritter portrayed While the actions he took and the orders he gave were undoubtedly significant contributors to the disaster, he was also not aware of the shortcomings in the reactor design that would cause them to have such deadly consequences.
@Eltanin25
10 ай бұрын
Well, the thing is that not even the scientist who knew about all the shortcomings, would have guessed it. They knew it wasn't as safe as it could be, but didn't know how unsafe either. It was after the explosion that they were able to connect the dots and say how it could have exploded. Anyway, the sciece behind the reactor is too complicated and it's up to the most clever scientist to come up with the safety measures and up to the operators to keep them. And Dyatlov didn't do that. He didn't respect the set of rules for the experiment and he disrespected every safety measure for the reactor. He got the reactor to the state where it was dangerous, if he obeyed the rules, or if he disrespected just one of them, it wouldn't have happened. The reactor wouldn't have exploded in the normal regime as Dyatlov is suggesting in the interview. It wouldn't have exploded even during the experiment, was it conducted as it should have been.
@britneyfanvideosfl
4 ай бұрын
They were working under false information. He was told they couldn't explode. I don't think he was an evil person and even tried to help others. During this time USSR was under commie rule. They were taught certain ways to think ect. The depiction was wrong. The movie about Golda Mier portrays her as a hard or mean person and she wasn't in real life.
@lukegda
Жыл бұрын
I'm always amazed for the videos you upload and also a huge thank you for subtitles 😁
@zeusantony5027
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic find and thank you for making this available.
@rsha_norkb
Жыл бұрын
congrats on 5k subs! RBMK-5K
@makismargaris6936
Жыл бұрын
unique , we thank u for your offer
@Just-human2000
4 ай бұрын
I think he is lying. He knows that this type of reactor has technical defects, but he did not expect the reactor core to explode.
@matt8043
Жыл бұрын
Pripyat looked like a beautiful city such a shame for it to be abandoned in the way it was
@jaytorr6701
6 ай бұрын
Probably as a person he might be different as he was depicted in the series. Of course a drama needs a a villain. However, even though he had the failsafe of the AZ-5 button, he operated like he was managing a steam engine and not a nuclear reactor.
@aluminium5738
4 ай бұрын
Dyatlov's exams were the hardest, thats according to Molye, and it's all that needs to be said.
@aramirez8427
Жыл бұрын
WOW....amazing video.
@lukavideo
Ай бұрын
Why is ignored fact that Tuptunov and Akimov didnt activated AZ-5 button before the test of turbine? It was written in protocol of the test that AZ-5 should be activated before test of turbine.
@StefanKo1224
7 ай бұрын
Why is there so many films from late 80s and 90s that are black and white without coloration, like it was filmed in 1940s
@thepoint...
10 ай бұрын
We're judging a man by watching a western documentary, not knowing the entire thing. Great, isn't it?😃
@deansmith6924
8 ай бұрын
Best comment here. Nobody reads history any more just watches HBO and thinks they know it all. The design of the displaces was changed about 1983 and only 2 units used that fatal changed control rods. Unit 1 at ingnlina and unit 4 at Chernobyl. The operators where never told. It was Dyatlov and Akimov That worked out what caused the accident in hospital. In the Soviet Union men where always to blame never equipment. It’s in the small print of INSAG- 7 report. All RBMK rods were corrected after the accident. History learned incorrectly is just propaganda
@boskee
4 ай бұрын
It wasn't even a documentary. It was a TV Show written by the guy who came up with the Hangover Part 3
@TheOldnic
4 ай бұрын
It points to Dyatlov's boss that built Chernobyl unit 4 !
@sir_christmas_leopold_duckson
11 ай бұрын
I wonder if he ever got to enjoy a butter and caviar sandwich again before he died.
@slawaol4582
11 ай бұрын
а поднимать мощность после провала тебя кто заставлял, или СИУР Топтоунов/Трегуб сами себя заставили ? Не было бы этого, не было бы и аварии. Мудило, людей, станцию и город угробил..
@user-li2ke3zp9x
5 ай бұрын
В 75 году на Ленинградской АЭС был такой же случай без участия Дятлова… Но пронесло. Имеющиеся параметры реактивности на момент чп в руководстве по эксплуатации не трактовались как критические и связанные с безопасностью. Запас реактивности, на то время, описывался как наличие потенциала для управления. Чем он больше, ем больше диапазон для возможных действий. О концевом эффекте знали, но о том, что при определенных обстоятельствах от достигает такого масштаба - нет. Не надо перевешивать работу конструкторов и проектировщиков на работяг. Проблема была на других АЭС, родится вывод о том, что это системная ошибка, а не одного человека стрелочника? Или пока сложно, проще все таки найти виноватого и всю вину кучи ответственных людей свалить на одного?
@user-vz1wf1dv9e
4 ай бұрын
Вот реально до взрыва не знал об опасности РБМК а после прям прозрел, всю подноготную поднял а что же раньше молчал не бил тревогу? Какого хрена полезли со своим экспериментом? Две станции отказались от этого а на ЧАЭС впереди планеты всей, да ещё без ведома и контроля разработчиков реактора.
@alexanderbykov5814
2 ай бұрын
диванный эксперт
@theophanesantoniou8539
10 ай бұрын
you see now how far different western documentaries are from reality? it s a different universe
@asierbarriorosales2505
10 ай бұрын
Dear user, Sadly, so sadly, there is no "documentary" but a Sciense Fiction genre TV series is more than enough on keep the "brain-washing machine" on... What else but IDIOTS can we expect from "IDIOCRACY- LAND"? All the best, fella. Greetings from Spain
@natalisuvorova7116
9 ай бұрын
100%
@btudrus
Ай бұрын
what has this propaganda piece have to do with reality?
@jamesbowden4871
Ай бұрын
Interview with Dyatlov from prison: not great, not terrible.
@politicstoday8002
28 күн бұрын
Aged very much in those 5 years
@mastercylinder5225
4 ай бұрын
Who was in charge at the time of this disaster????? Don't forget that!!! It seems many commentors below seem to have forgotten that key point. He could have stopped the process, but he didn't.
@laserdrip
9 ай бұрын
Effortlessly lights up a cig, man doesn't give a f&*( about radiation.
@254lele
Жыл бұрын
he was a chain smoker too
@aluminium5738
4 ай бұрын
Everybody was.
@Eisenbergsteve
Ай бұрын
Bruh its crazy😂😂
@LML8071
Жыл бұрын
其實我相信有部分是設計問題,另一部分是官僚體系,他有罪,但不完全是他的罪
@brazil271
9 ай бұрын
the hbo series about chernobyl should have cast will ferrell in the role of professor legasov, because they look too much
@maxdronov
Ай бұрын
We know that it was not HIS fault.
@brachka77
Жыл бұрын
Штейнберго-хомячки, долдонящие, что "это был не эксперимент, а испытание!!!!111", послушайте чем это было для человека, руководившего этим экспериментом, ведь говорит прямым текстом: "Сам эксперимент выбега..." 1:35
@Killer93441
Жыл бұрын
Шёл бы ты куда-нибудь доучиться орфографии...
@natalisuvorova7116
9 ай бұрын
Глубокий достойный человек
@kbtechandmedia
Жыл бұрын
Surprised he just didn't go Reactor 4 on the prison walls.
@oktogen1476
Жыл бұрын
This video actually destroys HBO series full of propaganda. Narrator part at the middle till the end of the video is eye opening
@KellyJK07
8 ай бұрын
Some people say that he was an excellent, skilled worker...doesn't matter in this case...the western perspective is better, and has more compassion for human life, which shows in our infrastructure designs. The soviets were cruel, dishonest, and took human life to be of little value...in many things they did. One does not have to look deep into design and manufacture of military equipment, subs, space rockets, SSTs, nuclear power or weapons...all of it caused massive loss of life and pollution...due to poor design, and many other shortcuts, and sins...
@ganessinv
Жыл бұрын
this guy's over selfishness to get promotion resulted in one of the worst tragedy for humans.. this kind of cruel man should not exist. he had several opportunities to stop the test but he was so adamant and went ahead, destroyed earth.
@AntiDot70
9 ай бұрын
Arrogant and defiant to the bitter end.
@tehsohong
Жыл бұрын
Stop the lies Dyatlov you forced Akimov to do it and you violated some safety rules. Although, the rbmk reactor's design also has to pay and be fixed.
@dez1989
Жыл бұрын
It's amazing that he still has the arrogance of 10 men. The way he acts in all of his interviews was still the same. I didn't do it. I didn't cause it. It had nothing to do with me. With this arrogance I can see how he pushed the other operators in the control room that night. I understand that there was critical information that he was not aware of. Maybe he would have acted differently if he knew of the instability of the RBMK. To be honest, I don't think it would have mattered. Prior to the meltdown he had lost his son to an accident. His son died of radiation poisoning years before the accident. Even the death of his son didn’t change his arrogant attitude towards radiation and the way he ran the RBMK reactors. He ruled that control room that night with the typical Soviet will! Damn these people. They aren’t near as smart or powerful as I am. Damn this reactor! It can't explode! Nothing I can do can hurt this reactor. And so on!
@swokatsamsiyu3590
Жыл бұрын
While I do understand that he didn't know about the fatal flaw in the Control Rods and the equally guilty Soviet state absolutely used him as a convenient scapegoat, his arrogance truly is insufferable! Having studied both the accident and the RBMK extensively, I still cannot get over how badly he abused both the staff and the reactor and still thought it would turn out well. I have worked with big, powerful heavy machinery for the better part of 30yrs and there are certain things you just do not do with that type of equipment, no matter how many reassurances you get from higher-ups/ smart people. And that goes double for when you're dealing with things like a nuclear reactor! Yes, the RBMK has design flaws. Yes, it shouldn't have been built the way it was. The Soviets were idiots for combining weapons grade plutonium production and electricity generation in one reactor. They were a bunch of tools for not giving it proper containment and for not sufficiently addressing the positive void coefficient. But Dyatlov absolutely forced it to do things it couldn't. An RBMK was never designed to run at low power for extended periods of time, because the poor thing can't do it even if it wanted to! The soviets designed it with the intention of running it at full power for as long as they could make it run at full power without breaking anything. It was well known among most operators that the RBMK is a handful at the best of times, but especially at low power near the end of a fuel cycle it will become downright grumpy if you start to muck about with it. If you then start forcing an operating regime on it for which it is ill-suited, you are courting disaster. The earlier accident Dyatlov was involved in, was at the top secret naval base where he supervised installing nuclear reactors in Soviet submarines. Those are all VVERs (the Russian variant of a PWR) without exception. These reactors are known for their safety, stability and mild temper, especially when compared with an RBMK, and he still managed to piss one off to the point it lost its cool and spilled its radioactive guts all over the dock. Anyone else see a pattern here? He came away with a 100 Röntgen radiation dose which later unfortunately killed his son through secondhand exposure. He was never the same after that. It made him more driven, more willful.
@aluminium5738
Жыл бұрын
@@swokatsamsiyu3590 if you believe that Dyatlov abused staff, then you clearly have not been studying Chernobyl hard enough. Edit: I read the rest of your comment, it was chock-full of inaccuracies, so let me fix them. 1: "The Soviets were idiots for combining weapons grade plutonium production and electricity generation in one reactor." Nope, plutonium was never produced in RBMKs, in fact, RBMK was not even designed for plutonium production, as RBMK was a civilian reactor. A few reactors made prior to RBMK (the "grandfather" reactors) were experimental, and the proposal to use them for military purposes was drawn up but turned down. 2: "The earlier accident Dyatlov was involved in, was at the top secret naval base where he supervised installing nuclear reactors in Soviet submarines." He worked at the Lenin Komsomol Shipyard in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and headed Secret Laboratory No. 23, which yes, equipped submarines with nuclear reactors, but the issue comes here: "Those are all VVERs" No, VM type reactors. You clearly have never had any experience with nuclear reactors, so let me explain. VVER is a civilian nuclear reactor for generating electricity, and yes, meets more safety standards than RBMK. But these reactors are not naval reactors. In fact, naval reactors are different than civilian reactors. The fact that you thought that soviets were cramming VVER reactors into submarines is beyond me. Anatoly Dyatlov wasn't an incompetent buffoon like you think of him as, in fact, I know for a fact that you watched the inaccurate Zero-Hour documentary at least twice without even touching actual literature about the disaster. You state that you have spent 30 years working with heavy machinery, Dyatlov spent 6 years studying at the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, graduating with a degree in Automation and Electronics, with Honors. He spent 14 years at that shipyard and tested and installed 40 VM-type reactors. He transferred to Chernobyl under construction in 1973 as the third Senior Specialist at the plant, with practical experience in the nuclear industry. Since VM reactors are much different than RBMK, he actively studied everything about those reactors, working 10 hours a day. He developed a friendship with a certain Anatoly Sitnikov, and was eventually made Deputy Chief Engineer for Operation of the Second Stage (Unit 3 and 4) with Sitnikov being Deputy Chief Engineer for Operation of the First Stage. In November of 1985, he supervised an equipment test on the turbines, and again in April of 1986, where his life would be changed forever.
@dez1989
Жыл бұрын
@@swokatsamsiyu3590 More Driven, More forceful and More arrogant to the point of IDIOCY! Instead of having learned a lesson and learned to respect the atom, he became the complete opposite! If they would have run a mental and emotional test on this man, they would have easily seen that he was NOT mentally or emotionally qualified to work anywhere near a nuclear reactor. I know, different times, different cultures. However it truly stands to reason that you need the most stable human beings to be in control of such devices! Sort of like Putin running the Soviet Union! Oops, I ment to say Russia.
@cynser2292
Жыл бұрын
@@aluminium5738 thank you
@SesionPacifica
11 ай бұрын
@@aluminium5738 great commentary, thank you my friend
@sarahawkinsliepke4908
Жыл бұрын
No matter how much we all pray for his soul to be forgiven He killed so so many people
Пікірлер: 61