Looks like an interesting company. I wish them well.
@graysonbaker9053
2 ай бұрын
shoutout tim dillon
@salty_berserker_channel
2 ай бұрын
you can invest in them. LUNR is their symbol. $3.60 a share. i bought a bunch. looks like a solid and and ambitious team
@jjthejetplane11
2 ай бұрын
Yep. Really interesting company. Its the best example in history of a spaceflight of a stock company that takes full advantage of the stock market, and gets away with a multi million dollar scam with no good results. Yep, I wish them well too......
@TheFlamingMoe1
2 ай бұрын
@@salty_berserker_channel ahahahaha
@ExceptionalLibra
Ай бұрын
@@salty_berserker_channel I did2 before the first launch.
@davidboyle1902
2 ай бұрын
Amazing that a small company may get to the moon twice in the same year. I wish the best of luck. Ad astra.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
2 ай бұрын
I hope this mission is successful.
@Ron4885
2 ай бұрын
Me too. 👍
@FerociousPancake888
2 ай бұрын
Same I have a decent amount of stock. Wouldn’t have invested if I didn’t believe in them. Hope all goes well, or at least most goes well.
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
2 ай бұрын
@@FerociousPancake888 What's the ticker?
@ARWest-bp4yb
2 ай бұрын
Looking forward to IM-2!🚀👍👍
@The-KP
2 ай бұрын
I'm really liking this channel more and more. Dispassionate reporting on space technology news, without injecting a bunch of bias or opinion like them other blokes. 👏
@marks7502
2 ай бұрын
thanks for the news
@dissaid
2 ай бұрын
Thanks man !
@NeilGros
2 ай бұрын
Sounds like a great plan good luck and congrats
@galliumgames3962
2 ай бұрын
Got invited to see the launch of IM-1 through one of my college’s clubs, basically the entirety of the intuitive machines company was out there too to watch it go up. We don’t get to see much moon exploration anymore, so I hope we get to see even more with the second mission.
@tluangasailo3663
2 ай бұрын
two moon landing in a year!
@Wurtoz9643
2 ай бұрын
4 counting SLIM and Chang'e 6
@zander_the_space_nerd
2 ай бұрын
@@Wurtoz9643 5 counting Blue Ghost
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
All cartoons, woo hoo.
@michelmilaneh8963
2 ай бұрын
@@richspillman4191low iq statement
@jshlds46
2 ай бұрын
Absolutely great informative video, Subscribed! Please continue to follow IM's progress and share updates with videos like this one.
@40MileDesertRat
2 ай бұрын
Here is to good luck and a great landing!
@rippingbag
2 ай бұрын
Shareholder! LUNR
@salty_berserker_channel
2 ай бұрын
mee too. bought in 3 times as their stock price dove. im underwater and will by even more
@migs7220
2 ай бұрын
@@salty_berserker_channel seeing the response to simple reports during the first launch, I wish you the most profitable reactions for the next year or so and beyond!
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
@@salty_berserker_channel Why? Because they draw cartoons?
@robsin2810
2 ай бұрын
May the force be with you.
@r-saint
2 ай бұрын
Wish them luck
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
Never, they are a stupid company that makes bad equipment.
@BLD426
2 ай бұрын
Best of luck..
@dougburright7275
2 ай бұрын
Do they have the Earth spinning in the wrong direction, in the views from the Moon's surface?
@crosslink1493
2 ай бұрын
It looks like it at just after 4:10. Good catch!
@davidcarrillo7758
2 ай бұрын
If south is “up” ie the world turned upside down from that perspective it changes east and west. Look closely and Africa is upside down. At 4:11
@fepatton
2 ай бұрын
Perhaps not. Remember, they’re talking about a South Pole landing, so here south is “up”. 😊
@Dergoh44
2 ай бұрын
Yup that's it, north pole of the earth is facing down, it's a simulated view from the south pole of the moon !
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
It's like if you look at the solar system from way above the north pole it turns counter clockwise but if you envision it from the south pole it turns clockwise.
@pranititiwari6525
2 ай бұрын
All the best🎉 congratulations 🎉
@johnnyhollis9977
2 ай бұрын
I think the craft could do with a wider span on the landing legs in view of it's height. Any sideways movement will have an effect on the inertia when landing, making toppling that little bit more likely. However fingers crossed that this one nails it this time!
@MattNolanCustom
2 ай бұрын
Do you think that the craft is uniformly dense?
@johnnyhollis9977
2 ай бұрын
@@MattNolanCustom Well I would imagine that most of the weight is housed in the lower half at least. It will be interesting to see what upgrades they make in the 3rd rendition of the vehicle. 😉
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
@@johnnyhollis9977 It also has to fit in the diameter of the launch rocket.
@selectthedead
2 ай бұрын
More for the algorithm! Would also love to hear more critique like this video or Boings Star liner! Especially with SpaceX. One does not see their wrong doings, but they are there. Like the Watertowers they did not reinforce.
@MrPashto96
2 ай бұрын
the water towers that they were already removing?
@jameswilson5165
2 ай бұрын
Well done!
@akakakakakak3084
2 ай бұрын
Easy cakes in 70's, and now is attempting 💪
@patrickradcliffe3837
2 ай бұрын
Five bucks this one will tip over too.
@MrSummitville
2 ай бұрын
I will be take that bet. I think, it lands up right.
@EtzEchad
2 ай бұрын
Looks like something I built in KSP.
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
That's because it's only a cartoon.
@riverakers
2 ай бұрын
I hope they double check the double checkers before the next attempt.
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
It is all cartoons and simulations.
@buntnik
2 ай бұрын
Would any lander designer put odds more in their favor by using a low center of gravity design?
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
Do you know what the CG of that lander is? Why do you assume it would be easy to make it lower? Do you think the people who designed are stupid?
@SebastianWellsTL
2 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@CAPTINKING
2 ай бұрын
imagine astronauts in 2028 like: lets tilt this back up and plug it in
@realmstupid-on8df
2 ай бұрын
Maybe they should try landing a ball so it can't possibly land sideways again.
@UQRXD
2 ай бұрын
100 million, compared to wars small change.
@scottymoondogjakubin4766
2 ай бұрын
Lets break the chain of landers landing sideways !
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
Let's build a lander the correct way and eliminate the possibility of falling over.
@nicosmind3
2 ай бұрын
Breaking a leg? That's very popular with actors
@UtahBlender
2 ай бұрын
Really cool mission purpose, but will it find, water?
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
Only if the simulation program says so.
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
If it does that will be something.
@curtc4918
2 ай бұрын
You build a tall lander and are surprised that it tips over? Blame it on software!
@alanmartin6708
2 ай бұрын
Are they going to launch on Space X rocket?
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
He only said so.
@alanmartin6708
2 ай бұрын
@@richspillman4191 What do you mean?
@rockerfromthebackstreets
2 ай бұрын
JUST ADMIT THE LAST ONE CRASHED
@manuwilson4695
2 ай бұрын
COME ON AMERICA! get your act together.
@ironspider9280
2 ай бұрын
Idk why ,but your voice sounds so sarcastic 😂😂😂 Great video though
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
Terrible video, nothing real about it.
@JacquesTreehorn
2 ай бұрын
I bet it lands on it's side again.
@agustinvelazques3748
2 ай бұрын
Hopefully this time they don't spend some of the budget on pizza parties, wait till you land successfully!
@jjthejetplane11
2 ай бұрын
The fact that this 'lander' and the company that built it haven't delivered on anything they promised yet is really telling. 'We promise to live stream the landing' (they didn't do it) 'we promise it will land safely' (they didn't do that either.) And the fact they were calling it a success for the nation and then didn't tell anyone it failed until the stock markets closed... this company made a poor example of a lunar impactor, which we could already do in the late 50s, and they called it a success... So. Many. Lies!
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
Let me see you do it. Otherwise shut up. Try sleeping at night, it might help.
@LeonelLimon-nj7tu
2 ай бұрын
Can you please shoot the LZ with Harpoon first that will relay telemetry
@LeonelLimon-nj7tu
2 ай бұрын
to lander or even connect to, like a sleeve.
@LeonelLimon-nj7tu
2 ай бұрын
...oh, and fuck AI 😆
@LeonelLimon-nj7tu
2 ай бұрын
Harpoon collect sample from penetration + drill apparatus
@UQRXD
2 ай бұрын
Earth spinning wrong direction I agree.
@davidcarrillo7758
2 ай бұрын
From South Pole. Africa is going east since it is upside down
@UQRXD
2 ай бұрын
@@davidcarrillo7758 Upside down.
@MrRussvett
2 ай бұрын
how about NOT going down and forward at the same time 5 feet above landing "down only"
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
That can be resolved by using the tested landing system as intended instead of an untested software system.
@robbhahn8897
2 ай бұрын
Maybe the next one can do the trick of standing on its head😅
@Ryan.Dias619
2 ай бұрын
Lunar circus competition 😂😅
@greggsteven1028
2 ай бұрын
make it short and squaty
@fedorbutochnikow5312
2 ай бұрын
How does Intuitive Machines profit? Who pays them? Who needs data from the moon?
@filonin2
2 ай бұрын
Scientists at various NGO's around the world. The Moon will be colonized and divided up for it's resources within our lifetimes and the planning needs to start now.
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
Did you ever learn how to do an online search? All of your answers are likely to be found there!! It is better for a person to learn how to fish than to expect that fish will just be given to him!! 😁
@fedorbutochnikow5312
2 ай бұрын
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 With all this schooling you gave me, you could have just answered my f*cking questions.
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
@@fedorbutochnikow5312 Sounds like you would do almost anything to avoid looking up the answers yourself?! 🙄
@fedorbutochnikow5312
2 ай бұрын
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 with an attitude like yours I sure do look up answers myself.
@tanagra2
2 ай бұрын
Even to a child. You can see its top heavy with spindly legs. It was bound to fall over.
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
No it's not bound to fall over. If the safety on the first flight has been properly disabled on the first flight then the laser range finder would likely have worked properly allowing for a safe landing. Instead the IM lander had to use an untested software system which resulted in the lander falling over primarily because it was still moving sideways as it approaches the surface.
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
So you're a child eh?
@khankrum1
2 ай бұрын
Who IS IT the creates these headlines????? Machines " plural " ARE! not IS !
@tepidtuna7450
2 ай бұрын
WTF? "Intuitive Machines" is the company name. "IS" is correct!
@migs7220
2 ай бұрын
If Intuitive Machines was a band, maybe you would be pedantic. Intuitive Machines is a single entity. A company.
@alistairallen829
Ай бұрын
Yes it was a remarkable achievment it didnt cost the usual extravaagant amount of money for such a mission. It wasnt cost efective, because effective has to be successful. This mission failed, and everyone knows that. So stop bleating on about the amount of Data that was procured for the other science modules. The data retieved would not fill 4% of my Home PC hard Drive and thats 500 Gb. The true reflection of success is shown in your share price. Please take it on the chin and admit that in all the excitement, schoolboy errors like preflight check lists were disregaurded, when they should have been checked and rechecked on many formats, it was an enable or disable pin switch that was critically overlooked. Therefore your simulater tested and mission chosen lander software could not be initialised. Thats why you failed.Good luck if Nasa give you another go, we only are as good as our last f*** up
@Вивсівідстій
2 ай бұрын
Only SpaceX could perform a successful landing.
@filonin2
2 ай бұрын
Many already have and SpaceX has not so... no.
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
Space X has never landed any vehicle on the moon. 🙄
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
Right after Tesla get's those self driving robo-taxis built. The Moon can wait.
@Helliconia54
2 ай бұрын
using the same heavily flawed lander for second mission? they must have money to throw away. It needs a MUCH wider stance. I hope the second lander falls over. Then maybe, just maybe, they'll take this seriously. So stupid.
@michaeldeierhoi4096
2 ай бұрын
How many times did you succeed at a really difficult task the first time? Just because the IM-1 ended up on its side the first flight does not mean that the whole lander is flawed. The first failed because a safety switch for the Lazer system was not disabled ahead of time. Consequently, the Lazer land finder could not be used and an untested software landing system had to be used. The IM-2 has upgrades to correct this problem and we will see how it does. It's also amazing that this tiny aerospace company built this lander for the relatively low cost of 100 million. This company is persistent and consequently will do better the next try.
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
So you find Aladdin's lamp, you rub it and this is what you wish for?
@Helliconia54
Ай бұрын
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 A smart person LEARNS from others. Apollo had a WIDE stance and landed. Not rocket science
@michaeldeierhoi4096
Ай бұрын
@@Helliconia54 I'll be laughing when the company called Imaginative Machines, that built this probe, corrects their landing system protocol with a similar probe and lands on the moon on the second try. For a company that built the craft on a shoestring budget and NASA support they will get there. Why they designed it the way it is is their business.
@richspillman4191
2 ай бұрын
What a stupid design, anyone can see that it is top heavy.
@pi.actual
Ай бұрын
Without any specs how do you know what the center of gravity is? The thing made it to the Moon and you think the people who designed and built it are stupid? Based on just looking at a picture?
@richspillman4191
Ай бұрын
@@pi.actual It is obvious number one, two, they are not on the moon it is just a make believe story
@meesalikeu
2 ай бұрын
i was wondering where this was thx
@woody5109
2 ай бұрын
Maybe they should just purchase a lander from China 😂
Пікірлер: 119