The best visual effects? Logan, no doubt. That shit blew my mind when I found out that in multiple occassions, Hugh Jackman was full CGI. Especially when he sees X-24.
@Alptraumification
5 жыл бұрын
The best CGI face replacement I’ve seen so far was in the movie Logan.
@pottuvoi2
5 жыл бұрын
Oh, yes. It was amazing.
@stargazestudios
5 жыл бұрын
It was so good, I honestly thought he did the scene twice most of the time
@nikhilbharali5298
3 жыл бұрын
@@stargazestudios So, you're telling me Hugh Jackman didn't do a double role in that movie? Or did he just give the expressions for X24 and that is what was replaced later in VFX?
@nikhilbharali5298
3 жыл бұрын
@@stargazestudios Oh OK! So Hugh didn't do even the expressions of X24 or anything?
@SlaV0
4 жыл бұрын
What a great effects! And I am huge fan of digital effects of 90’s. This was pure pleasure to see original footages of Forrest Gump and how it was made compared to final movie. Such good effect considering low performance of computer pd that era. Great to see and learn.
@TheOneTrueSpLiT
4 жыл бұрын
The people behind all this invisible CGI/VFX wizardry don't get the appreciation they truly deserve. I find it fascinating how much reliance the industry has on these people to pull-off even the most basic of scenes such as those in Ugly Betty as you commented here. I could see where CGI was going way back in the late '80s/early '90s when I dreamed of making a career in CGI. All we really had then was the great work by John Lassiter and the Pixar team, of which I re-created many scenes on an Amiga 2000 and Real3D, until Terminator 2 debuted and firmly set the CGI flag in the ground of the future.
@johnprudent3216
4 жыл бұрын
Invisible effects, to me, can be just as amazing, or sometimes, more so than the obvious ones. The craft behind them only adds to their underappreciated magic. Glad to see a video about this. I also love that there is intelligent, constructive analysis/ criticism of films that got certain right or wrong.
@wado1942
2 жыл бұрын
I feel the same way about golden-age Hollywood effects. There's so many matte paintings, miniatures etc. that I never knew were effects, till I saw how they were done. Some are still flawless today.
@MacLeod1905
5 жыл бұрын
This is why I love old movies
@Xillaw
5 жыл бұрын
Yeah - the voice is very robotic. Not quite there yet.
@More-Space-In-Ear
5 жыл бұрын
These people who spend many many hours behind the computer screen all deserve oscars, they’re the ones who literally are making films a frame by a frame...I love VFX and CGI, it’s come a long way since I did it....
@matheuspande
4 жыл бұрын
I just found this channel and I need to say that from now on it is my favourite one
@BEST_Pictures_Film
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the many informations in this video. Very good job!
@alftr5479
4 жыл бұрын
Superb video
@halo1reach1nerd
5 жыл бұрын
this is just a text to speech video lmao
@JumpzVidz
5 жыл бұрын
It's still an amazingly well put together video
@deenanthekemoni9821
5 жыл бұрын
Great videos bro. Keep up the solid work 👍,
@chengong388
5 жыл бұрын
A lot of complaints about “unrealistic” digital humans now days are not because the effect wasn’t real enough, it’s because people know that actor is already dead or much older. To people who don’t already know, almost none of them can see the effect.
@bilalkomputer
5 жыл бұрын
Your digital voice has beaten the CGI information. Nice work!
@TOMKHOMION
5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful works
@moutishmtauni5792
5 жыл бұрын
thats really amazing thank you for sharing this and help us to improve more :)
@zobook
5 жыл бұрын
The Michael Douglas deaging effect, although amazingly well crafted, is very noticeable (there is a little bit of uncanny valley there), R.D. Jr. one i think looks more natural.
@Phoenix_of_Sun
5 жыл бұрын
I don't know, when I see clips of it on KZitem it looks really fake but when I watch the movie on Blu-Ray it looks really convincing. It's like the KZitem encoding makes CGI effects stand out more for some reason.
@neeteshgurjar3250
5 жыл бұрын
Is it your voice or updated text to speech, sounds more natural
@JackRipper8881
5 жыл бұрын
Text to speech. It sounds shite.
@StefanReich
5 жыл бұрын
@@JackRipper8881 What? If it's a computer, it sounds AMAZING. Didn't think it was a machine at all
@Praxiszooms
5 жыл бұрын
@@JackRipper8881 I noticed it right away...the sound of the voice is pretty good...the intionation though...and the emotion...is completely lifeless.
@parsleyproductions7956
5 жыл бұрын
@@Praxiszooms I've just realized when this video ended. Been so shocked that I noticed it at the end
@Soloohara
5 жыл бұрын
i noticed it only after this comment, I thought it was a human voice
@FarmingWithAsifBashir
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Keep it up. Thank you so much! 😍🧡🦋👍💛😘💜🌹☘️🌷💚❤️🍦💞♥️
@macanimation5471
5 жыл бұрын
Amazing content 😱😱👍👍
@Rodgleztube
5 жыл бұрын
Perfect video!
@j8577798yt
5 жыл бұрын
Amazing!!
@JuxtapositionRed
5 жыл бұрын
wow I went the entire video without realizing that the voice was automated. I figured it out when I read the comments.
@tommyboybr
5 жыл бұрын
*SUBSCRIBE TO ME FOR NO REASON* Me too, at the beginning I thought that it sounded a little robotic, but as the video progressed, I thought that it was real because it got more natural.
@artyknotswastaken
5 жыл бұрын
I noticed at the first 30 secs lol
@JuxtapositionRed
5 жыл бұрын
@@artyknotswastaken Huh, I would never had known had I not read the comments 🤔
@ChironLastBackup
5 жыл бұрын
@@artyknotswastaken i already after 5 seconds!
@Durwood71
5 жыл бұрын
I thought it was plainly obvious after hearing the first few words.
@kolynxazaka6877
4 жыл бұрын
great job
@noremacanimation
5 жыл бұрын
Great video. I have to disagree about Tarkin though, I thought it stood out a mile as a CG head.
@MobiusVideo
5 жыл бұрын
Noremac Animation & Games Agreed. I hated it. It was marginally better than Leia but not much.
@2lobo777
4 жыл бұрын
it was really bad
@kalaipunal
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your uploading and imformarion
@miked1869
5 жыл бұрын
I have to say that although I'm not a huge fan of Forrest Gump, watching the clips from it here gave me a new appreciation for the outstanding quality of its effects work. Hard to believe it was released in 1994! In general I think this video is a bit over-generous though. Some of the shots that the narration claims are indistinguishable from reality are actually at least a little bit 'off'. Children of Men is one of my favourite films, and they did a great job with the CGI baby, but it's not completely convincing.
@AB-mv1mb
5 жыл бұрын
it was awesome!
@FilmFloozy
3 ай бұрын
Terrific!
@piotrekpunk
5 жыл бұрын
0:18 Małgosia Kożuchowska
@toniodotcom
4 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love CGI that is CGI you can't tell, even when they show it to you, you still won't see the difference.
@corelkeycinema4dtutorial725
5 жыл бұрын
I've learnt many thing from your channel, thanks VFX Geek, plz. make more video
@Rophe18
4 жыл бұрын
Interesting at first but scary shit at the end lol
@iphone4wsom3
4 жыл бұрын
One of these days I reckon we'll get a whole movie that's made 100% in cgi, the set, the actors, everything! Would be hella cool to see
@rockunbrunat1316
4 жыл бұрын
it so cool
@ugzz
5 жыл бұрын
I always notice CGI characters, i guess i have a bit of an eye for it. Blade Runner is the first time i was fooled 100%, that effect is stunning.
@TheChromaKid
5 жыл бұрын
Yeah the effect in 2049 blew my mind when I found it it was an effect, being unfamiliar with the character from the original I had no idea that it wasn't just another actor
@pottuvoi2
5 жыл бұрын
Fast and Furious 7 had some of the most amazing work done for a face replacement by Weta Digital.
@republicgalaxy4348
5 жыл бұрын
im not surprised at all when it got to a point when the thought and creativity had left the brain and absorbed studio fever and the majority of film makers forgot what the real world looks like
@Scripture-Man
4 жыл бұрын
Oh the irony… a video about "invisible effects" narrated by a text-to-speech program! :)
@StartupMediaProduction
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent brother , can you make a video on how to get started with vfx . Mind, tools and area perception of vfx creation. If u do than its huge help for me and many more .
@deck8462
5 жыл бұрын
They have always trouble with the mouth movements. Its something that still requires some years to be perfect
@TheUzurpator96
5 жыл бұрын
Wow, i'm shocked seeing Polish actors in movie about CGI :o
@RSpudieD
5 жыл бұрын
I do like this Text To Speech better so good job for swamping it out. Good job overall, actually.
@neeteshgurjar3250
5 жыл бұрын
I didn't notice until I checked the previous one. I am no native English speaker but this really sounds more humane.
@Verspassungsschutz
5 жыл бұрын
You mean, the narratjon is not natural from a human?
@WSWEss
5 жыл бұрын
my brain just blowed up
@Diablist
4 жыл бұрын
i just noticed UNREAL ENGINE :D
@MatikTheSeventh
5 жыл бұрын
Unnoticed? Captain Big Head was the oddest CGI until Flying Head Bruce Banner.
@Winduct
5 жыл бұрын
The sheep from Brokeback Mountain are invisible CGI.
@Steve.909
5 жыл бұрын
The Baby was the most effective digital effect IMO.
@zorkan111
5 жыл бұрын
It's a bit sad that the better these CGI people are at their job, the less recognition they'll actually going to get because no one's even notice any CGI in the first place. Their job is to make sure no one notices that any work was being done in the first place.
@gekfurian
5 жыл бұрын
As I know, the first movie in which they used invisible special effects (they actually called them "normal effects") is True Lies, by James Cameron, in 1994 as well.
@Argelius1
5 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video, despite the annoying synthesized narration.
@SilaDrenja
5 жыл бұрын
8:10 when I watched terminator genesis, I thought that uncanny effect was on purpose to show he was just a robot
@Vitaliuz
5 жыл бұрын
Perfect! You almost cannot tell that the narrator is an AI.
@StefanReich
5 жыл бұрын
I want that software
@abstract734
5 жыл бұрын
speaking of fx i never even realised this was text to speech!
@hellfire5108
5 жыл бұрын
What about the Silver Surfer? That effect is still amazing today.
@kaliyuga1476
5 жыл бұрын
is irony or are yoy actually bragging about ir
@fredgarvinMP
4 жыл бұрын
Next video will talk about the advancements in speech synthesizing.
@rafatowers
5 жыл бұрын
Children of man was incredible
@daogenify
5 жыл бұрын
lmao 1:04, when Steven Seagal was a thing
@TheHannahcast
5 жыл бұрын
Just out of curiosity, is the narration being done by a text-to-speech program?
@VFXGeek
5 жыл бұрын
Yes ;)
@jagendrasinhbarad5647
5 жыл бұрын
@@VFXGeek which one?
@germanmontero228
5 жыл бұрын
04;16 Industrial Light & Magic | VFX and Animation Studio
@Devi1kin
5 жыл бұрын
От Таркина так и несло "зловещей долиной", слишком нереалистично он там смотрелся на фоне того же Креника, как и Лея.
@IceSword1728
4 жыл бұрын
Make a video of 'TextToSpeech effects - the history and the future'
@Mautar55
4 жыл бұрын
How could you forget the Benjamin Button movie?
@kernowarty
Ай бұрын
One problem as the visual effects get perfected for digitally created humans will be CCTV evidence of crimes. Surely that evidence will not be submissable in court because the argument could be that it was digitally created?
@NosferatuArucard
4 жыл бұрын
At 9:28 Is that suppose to be famous person (that I don't recognizance) or is it justa screen test :)?
@Idkdeclan
5 жыл бұрын
So much unexpected green screen in ugly Betty
@gravypatron
5 жыл бұрын
Speaking of de-aging, don't forget possibly the greatest example, Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. 👍
@skajsen
5 жыл бұрын
What happened with the faceswapping of Eastwoods face in In the line of fire (1993)?
@4thPlayerFilms
5 жыл бұрын
Most of these look pretty solid, but dear god, what went wrong with Tarkin and Leia? Those two weren't even close, they both looked like assets ripped from one of the EA games.
@yanndick
11 ай бұрын
Invisible effects have a sad side effect though : when somethjing amazing is made as a practical erffect and directly shot, most people thijnk it's just another CGI effect just because "they can do anything". 🙄
@Jahu-qs2us
5 жыл бұрын
Yeah that ping pong scene in forrest gump. Toooootally undetectable. Well... unless you have experienced physics on planet Earth
@shishersh1712
4 жыл бұрын
what if we start having animated celebrities that like appear in different movies and they start winning best part lol
@Anubis3200
4 жыл бұрын
They already do. I mean actors are replaced for digital models in half of Marvel films, especially action shots. Like Hella is CG apart from the face and full on lighting Thor is full CG apart from the head. And now Will Smith is releasing a new film where there will be his young clone running around who is CG character.
@APRICEPRODUCTION
5 жыл бұрын
3:32 you can see the scene with the tennis courts and buildings are CGI... the textures on the building look flat and looks like a 3D model.
@MOHAN-my6er
5 жыл бұрын
what TTS do you use????
@Arch3an
5 жыл бұрын
They probably used a generic one, then later edited the audio to make it sound smooth. (This is just a guess and how I would do it, though)
@mikebailey783
5 жыл бұрын
The text-to-speech voiceover used here almost falls into the uncanny valley of voice; it rides the line between stunted and fluid in an unsettling way. - Is it a Digital Human?
@djjarjun
5 жыл бұрын
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@sendforacar9323
5 жыл бұрын
Because they were talking about high-end visual-effects and fooling people in this video... Means we didn't notice the robotic voice?
@miguelcarvalho1960
4 жыл бұрын
Matte painting.
@SquirrelMaster115
4 жыл бұрын
just realize months later that is a robot
@aashishshahi6441
5 жыл бұрын
u should have listed paul walker frm furious 7
@mcv7396
4 жыл бұрын
Anyone know name of the movie in the end ???
@joerivangeluwe1570
4 жыл бұрын
am i the only one who don't mind the voice?
@editingdudevfx
4 жыл бұрын
Osm
@tezza48
5 жыл бұрын
What's with the TTS CG voice?
@javierjavier9841
4 жыл бұрын
NASA effects
@angry4ever804
3 жыл бұрын
Is this a joke? Rogue one digital face was much more noticeable than terminator Yes cause it has more talking scenes But the few seconds that Arnold digi double speaks is not noticeable at all
@aangirasahn3024
5 жыл бұрын
You kind of sound like a speech synthesizer
@RenaldMusic
4 жыл бұрын
How do you decide where you put the damn caption "before/after" because l'm so lost it pisses me off !
@VFXGeek
4 жыл бұрын
The captions are auto-generated by KZitem. I didn't create it.
@RenaldMusic
4 жыл бұрын
@@VFXGeek Not the subtitles the before/after in the video regarding the effects
@FarhadAhmedofficial
5 жыл бұрын
Invisible VFX
@polyeknewton
5 жыл бұрын
What about audrey hepburn in that advertising in italy?
@GUMMY_MKII
5 жыл бұрын
I want to know something Why is now everyone calling every algorithm « AI »? Motion tracking is not supposed to be an entity that acts on it’s own, it’s a sequence of operations that analyzes multiple images and translates it into a 3d space.
@MyFilippo94
5 жыл бұрын
There is actually a very valid reason. When you hear AI (from people that you can be sure they know what they're talking about) most probably the referred technique is not an algorithm. I have not now looked up to get perfect definitions, but commonly an algorithm is a fixed set of logical and mathematical rules that generally take an input value and give out another one. What is being referred as an AI is a neural network. Like an algorithm you can use a neural network to generate an output from an input, but unlike an algorithm, its working is very organic, much less clear and human-determined, and more importantly is _does_ change and evolve without literal human intervents on its inner working, not in the same way of an algorithm. These AIs are generated with a system similar to neurons talking to each other, and by training (literal trial and error of the inteligence), its behaviour slowly concentrates from pure randomness to the desired results it has been instructed to reach. You can teach an AI how to remove noise from an image, how to understand human language and turn it in digital words, how to recognize the content of a video (youtube's _algorithm_ is an example of this), how to generate music, how to swap faces in videos and photos (look for deepfakes videos)... You don't put literal math in an Ai, defining math formulas that describe the content of pixels with numbers and whatnot, it is deeply different. Look up for Neural Networks to discover more about how actual artificial inteligence is being used in your intrest areas, it's very fascinating.
@DrQuest44
5 жыл бұрын
The voice narration sounds normal but the speech syntax is odd.
@xscitobor1233
5 жыл бұрын
What was updated?
@VFXGeek
5 жыл бұрын
Only some details and ending. The video is basically the same.
@AB-mv1mb
5 жыл бұрын
few videos were added in the ending
@bdgjarvo2917
3 жыл бұрын
David Fincher blood in the girl with dragon tatoo
@aloorinithin5099
5 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on WETA DIGITAL
@VFXGeek
5 жыл бұрын
I'll add that to my list 👍
@MikeyMoNL
5 жыл бұрын
What puzzles me is that sometimes VFX seems totally unnecessary. Take one of the final examples in the video. Why did they have use a CG(-enhanced) cap? Thay could have just used a real cap. The same goes for Odin's eyepatch in Thor Ragnarok. For some strange reason they added the eye patch in post production. Is Anthony Hopkins allergic to eye patches?
@everythingphil9376
5 жыл бұрын
Tron Legacy's younger Jeff Bridges was great too.
@Winduct
5 жыл бұрын
No, it looks terrible today.
@everythingphil9376
5 жыл бұрын
@@Winduct No, The Scorpian King in The Mummy looks terrible.
@FabledGentleman
5 жыл бұрын
@@everythingphil9376 So did young Jeff Bridges xD
@TheRobloxianTacoLord
5 жыл бұрын
grand moff tarkin***
@GameDwarf
3 жыл бұрын
you got terminator because it was a robot who was doing the talking in the movie not a human being
Пікірлер: 210