👟 Check out Vessis Memorial Day sale and Vessi styles at www.vessi.com/cobyexplanes. If you missed the sale, Use code COBYEXPLANES for 15% off your order. Free shipping for CA, US, AU, JP, TW, KR, SGP
@FameyFamous
Жыл бұрын
Good timing. My everyday walking shoes are getting worn out. But these at 20% off are about double the price of the Merrell shoes I normally buy. Are they worth the premium?
@josedearimateiayjesus2178
Жыл бұрын
@@FameyFamous depends if you want give premium for americans or china
@unityorelse2375
Жыл бұрын
Y'all don't respect Africa so you won't see the connection 😞 you will though✌🏾
@Cybernetic_Systems
Жыл бұрын
That’s not a dog… 😉 #Labradors
@pauldickhaut2625
Жыл бұрын
China steals everything
@veowsaku
Жыл бұрын
The US aerospace company develops the systems and components for C919. My team have been working on this plane for years and those parts may have some of the commonality to Airbus and Boeing however C919 also have the unique sub systems. Believe it or not the commonalities between the plane is about 10% between the direct competitor models. 99.99% of the people rarely understand that recycle components from one plane to another May ended up costing more than developed new.
@TsLeng
Жыл бұрын
People don't get it. But a country that has a space station will and can build planes. All the hoo haa about stealing is just cope
@josephguo3429
Жыл бұрын
ye, all good stuffs was designed by u. got it
@minus21334
Жыл бұрын
doesnt matter, it's easier to run with the rhetoric comac 919 copied from boeing and airbus
@lilunchengsmiles
Жыл бұрын
Very informative. I have a question. When I read Chinese medias, they complained about USA intentionally gave them the C variant of the Leap engine which is weaker than the B and A version to keep Boeing and Airbus to have big advantages. Is this true?
@veowsaku
Жыл бұрын
@@lilunchengsmiles I don't believe that the company would give the customer less or more because of the Chinese vs Western customers. 1C engine has less thrust may be due to different requirements in the region where it will be operating the most. If there is a certain variable such as fuel quality, environmental pollution, and FOD susceptibility, are known then the engine maker will have to decrease the performance so that the flight hour reliability promise is met. The engines are the most expensive subsystem as well as flight safety so they cannot fail during flight.
@puzhao1639
Жыл бұрын
If reverse engineering is so easy, then explain why Japan failed again and again.
@largol33t12
Жыл бұрын
True, remember Japan many many moons ago, tried for years and poured billions and billions of Yen into an F16 project and simply threw in the towel. They couldn't get it to work and wound up buying customer versions from Lockheed-Martin.
@michaelgfyau4514
Жыл бұрын
Because USA don't allow them to.
@lzh4950
10 ай бұрын
@@largol33t12What about the F2?
@sparkles78
9 ай бұрын
WELL Red Emperor made space station which is 10 times more complex than a plane .
@mingouczjcz3800
9 ай бұрын
Good question. Well Japanese are now used to blaming USA for all its failures
@ebarsan
Жыл бұрын
Competition is always good. Airbus brought many changes for the better when it entered the market dominated by Boeing.
@achangyw
Жыл бұрын
I totally concur.
@sparkles78
9 ай бұрын
You must be drunk if you are thinking you can beat China ? Good luck, ask your govt to heavily subsides your shipping and transport industry first
@chjin1796
Жыл бұрын
The answer to this is simple, if it was easy to make airplanes by reverse engineering, then there wouldn't be just two giants in the world.
@tpplatfzft
Жыл бұрын
Look at the rapid expansion of CR and its HSR, who would have thought it would be possible in the first place? Aeroplane wise it is the same.
@Shy_Knee_Side_Up
Жыл бұрын
Both companies know every single thing they do is being watch and will be copied over time. That is a given. Also, while China is watching Airbus and Boeing - Boeing and Airbus ARE ALSO watching China. The knowledge transfer is not only one way.
@dc10fomin65
9 ай бұрын
Why nobody watches Embraer? Are they too stupid to make good flying machines ?
@amadoudiallo8129
Жыл бұрын
Given the cost of flights these days, I think the new Chinese made COMAX has a large share of the market to take
@g_pazzini
Жыл бұрын
good fit for LCC
@namisu9652
Жыл бұрын
comac
@achangyw
Жыл бұрын
Hope so
@rudyalfonsus686
Жыл бұрын
if they can win 50% of the local market, that would be more than enough for them
@esaw7067
8 ай бұрын
even if they only end up with a market share in domestic or developing country, its better than no share at all.
@petemacron4185
Жыл бұрын
The payoff matrix was pretty silly and not really applicable to this situation in my opinion. You’re assuming a simultaneous game which really doesn’t make sense here unless you posit that Boeing/Airbus would build a factory in China in complete secrecy and only announce it once completed. More realistically Boeing/Airbus would know the other party is building a facility in China and respond in kind. This is a lot different of a scenario than a simultaneous, one-shot game like what you describe. It’s more of an iterative game spaced out over a long time.
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY,---------------if the making of a plane can be copied , then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@Tomcatters
Жыл бұрын
I think it's a BIG mistake! Just remember what happened to US when started to move US factorys to China by 80's 90's and look where this got us today... Now Boeing and Airbus are doing the same, but with planes.
@hishamhassan6426
Жыл бұрын
Care to elaborate?
@mauroizquierdo9544
Жыл бұрын
Boeing hasn't built a single aircraft in China, Airbus has though, and that has its risks, other mfg like COMAC may "steal" that tech.
@vladilenkalatschev4915
Жыл бұрын
It’s already too late by all means, because for China it’s already enough to have a sample in order to copy
@mikercflyer7383
Жыл бұрын
Profits Uber ales.
@user-vv7ir1pl4j
Жыл бұрын
It's capitalism prize goes to the best manufacture for cost efficiency logistics. It's socialism to make those companies stay in the us
@lfu3530
Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure C919 is safe to fly since Chinese government don’t have the same privilege to get away with a fail like when the FAA of US giving Boeing a pass on the 737 max.
@lilunchengsmiles
Жыл бұрын
This video has many false information. China doesn’t need to steal foreign technologies if foreign companies decide to build assembly lines in China. When foreign companies want to build assembly in China, they have to reach agreements with China to give up certain IPs to gain privileges to slides of vast Chinese market shares. Most companies have been practicing that except Tesla. That is one of the points which triggered the trade war between US and China. One of the main reason westerners pick China is due to Chinese infrastructure build efficiency. Took Tesla 168 days to build Shanghai mega factory vs 300 days of German mega factory.
@Zrich98
10 ай бұрын
Embraer is honestly china’s biggest competition. Not Boeing or Airbus. Not likely they will be competing with them for a while. Embraer is huge and they have the cleanest safety record of all manufacturers. The E-jets more specifically are awesome jets. And with the E2’s out, I don’t see how the C919 beats the E-jets.
@zeyuwang2317
Жыл бұрын
C919's first commercial flight was yesterday.
@Peizxcv
Жыл бұрын
Listening to this guy explaining things is like listening to Peter Griffin explaining things
@Eiaacademyy
Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@samhy
Жыл бұрын
COMAC in the long terms will breakthroughs of many important components of aviations system's and subsystems.
@ccudmore
Жыл бұрын
Isn’t Airbus’ move to build their planes in the US similarly risky? We can’t naively ignore that there’s a lot of corporate espionage in the US as well.
@Calebs_Aviation
Жыл бұрын
Very true… The USA 🇺🇸 is also pretty well known for espionage and spying/ sabotaging other countries companies or their projects!
@tirentu
Жыл бұрын
yeah but anti-chinese propaganda is built in to every part of our existence in NA, so thats ok but when the chinese do it, theyre being sneaky and evil
@Sanyu-Tumusiime
Жыл бұрын
the US isn't dirty. we don't violate intelectual property. we are NOT CHINA.
@Sanyu-Tumusiime
Жыл бұрын
@@Calebs_Aviation America isn't dirty like CHINA CHINA CHINA. CHINA IS EVIL
@Ttui89.
Жыл бұрын
Then airbus can sue boeing
@christianljung6600
Жыл бұрын
The American way to think is in short terms. The chinese think and work and plan in very long terms. For them is just the first step, they dont care if they are 20 years behind , they know that in 20 years from now they will be were Airbus and Boing are , or even better.
@pinenkuo
Жыл бұрын
China Airlines isn't from China though, it's from Taiwan.
@BWB_Cubing
4 ай бұрын
7:47 „but thats just a theory, A GAME THEORY“
@rapidthrash1964
Жыл бұрын
Anyone can reverse engineer a plane with the right knowledge and access to a plane that they want to copy; it’s not just China
@stephendoherty8291
Жыл бұрын
Yes but if you can force ex workers to give their knowledge or rob the secrets you can cut the cost to get it to market and bypass competitors expensive investment
@stephendoherty8291
Жыл бұрын
Why didn't the chinese buy bombardier and presto chinese A220
@TsLeng
Жыл бұрын
And this is a country that has a space station.
@barkobummer
Жыл бұрын
@@TsLeng western powers are slowly losing the competitive edge and that's why there's constant smear and hate going on.
@marcmcreynolds2827
Жыл бұрын
"Anyone can reverse engineer a plane with the right knowledge and access to a plane that they want to copy" That's not how it works. Most of what goes into making an airliner isn't something you can just examine. For example, by what process was the metal for a bearing heat treated in order to have the necessary hardness? What sort of vacuum process, applied how many times, was needed to make a fan hub impervious to fatigue cracks? There are many thousands more things like that involved in producing an airliner which aren't revealed by examining a sample.
@ChristopherBurtraw
Жыл бұрын
I see it as minimal risk for IP. Most things on a plane can be reverse engineered once the product is physically delivered. Pros heavily outweigh this possible con. The bigger risk is that the government can just take anything that's inside the boarders if they desire. Automakers know this from experience, not necessarily with the PRC, but other countries with no limits on government power over the economy for sure - see the GM plant in Venezuela. As long as the economy remains relatively stable though, the CCP is not likely to do this.
@indian2003
Жыл бұрын
As an Asian I will always try to buy Asian products and I will gladly fly on a Chinese plane. Look at the 400 odd people that died in American 737 Max? Dont American planes crash?
@isaac_609
Жыл бұрын
Why did you put a China Airlines plane in? China Airlines is the flag carrier of Taiwan not China.
@fanjin
Жыл бұрын
0:40 Another youtuber who mixed up Air China (CA) and China Airlines (CI) 🤣
@rais1953
Жыл бұрын
Coby! Are Vessi shoes made in China? :)
@Avendesora
Жыл бұрын
Nope! They're made in Taiwan.
@rais1953
Жыл бұрын
@@Avendesora So made in China then. The name of the authority in Taipei is the Republic of China, its main airline is China Airlines, its athletes compete as Chinese Taipei, they speak Chinese and the constitution of the Republic of China claims sovereignty over all of China including Taiwan.
@Avendesora
Жыл бұрын
@@rais1953 Nah, but I can see why it's important to you to hold on to that belief as tightly as possible.
@stevesmoneypit6137
Жыл бұрын
@@rais1953 There is a world of difference between Tawain and China
@longbeach7623
Жыл бұрын
@@stevesmoneypit6137 the pollution and lack of air quality are not that much different.
@bbbl67
Жыл бұрын
Sure, Boeing and Airbus are making a mistake manufacturing in China, for exactly the reason you stated, they don't want to lose market share there, but risking losing their IP. But they also can make cheaper planes there that can be sent to other places outside of China (maybe not to the US), so it's not exactly a bad strategy. As for whether I'd fly on a Comac plane? Sure why not? It can't be any less safe than a 737 Max, we found out how badly the FAA screwed up their scrutiny of Boeing during those dark days. A better question to ask is whether you trust that the 737 Max is actually being better monitored now than it was before? So would you fly on a Max yet?
@marcmcreynolds2827
Жыл бұрын
"It can't be any less safe than a 737 Max" Sure it can.
@yogiahmad328
Жыл бұрын
Agree 💯 %
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY------------------if making a plane can be copied, then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@vladilenkalatschev4915
Жыл бұрын
Actually the reverse engineering is not that impossible. The example for that is B-29/ TU-4
@JDAbelRN
Жыл бұрын
TU 4, is that the new Russian passenger plane? 😂
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY---------------if the making of a plane can be copied, then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@1changi
Жыл бұрын
COMAC can make plane bodies at a lower cost for China at the moment. Makes a lot of sense to co-operate. Well, C919 is merely a Boeing737/Airbus 320 copy. Once they can dominate domestically, the market for this narrow body plane, they can move on to make 777 or 787 copies in the future. One day, not long in the future, COMAC will market C919 to the rest of Asia as a viable alternatives to Boeing 737 or Airbus 320.
@MetaView7
Жыл бұрын
copy? They use different materials and technology on the wings and body, how do they copy?
@johhw_6432
Жыл бұрын
C919 Copying Boeing? Copy planes that crash and explode ?
@budisuwandhi6818
Жыл бұрын
Everything China made better than the west always will be call stolen technology never China achievment.
@alanjyu
Жыл бұрын
I actually do not think that it is necessary to assemble airplanes in China when there are viable alternatives in places such as Mexico and India where the cost of Labor is lower. The manufacturing sector in China is also expected to shrink because the population is aging and people are retiring and many young people, especially the ones with college degrees, do not want to work in factories. The age of the average Chinese person is 38 years of age to while the age of the average Indian is 28 years of age. This difference suggests that India's population will grow and China's will shrink. India is already currently able to provide more labor support and at a lower cost. It has more people of working age. I'm also pretty sure that China lies about their total population. Their population had actually been shrinking for 20 years and their government is not going to tell you about the hundreds of millions of people whose lives were lost during COVID-19. Some experts estimate that China's real population is only between 800 million and 1 billion.The Chinese economy is simply not as mighty as the Chinese government makes it out to be. In reality, India had been the more viable option for many years now. Apple is already trying to leave China and I think Airbus and Boeing should follow suit.
@JDAbelRN
Жыл бұрын
I agree, India has proven they can produce very technical products and Mexico can also, but would require billions to build infrastructure to actually build a complete jetliner. Why doesn't Canada build bigger plants to finish or completely build an existing AB or Boeing design? The stolen secrets and reverse engineering threats are non existent.
@wainber1
Жыл бұрын
The question that forms the title of the above video is interesting. That's although Tupolev, with authorization from the Soviet Government, stole designs from the British-French Concorde to try to build its own: the TU-144. Tupolev's Concorde equivalent, as the Mustard KZitem man claims in his video "Why You Wouldn't Want to Fly On The Soviet Concorde - The TU-144 Story," lasted under a year hauling passengers. It's too early to say whether the C919 will be a commercial success but if it is, it may very well give Airbus and Boeing a run for their money.
@lhommeaudacieux
Жыл бұрын
As an economist I can assure, you don't understand how game theory or duopolies work. This is a long term game played out repeatedly. If A did not build but B did, A can still chose to build in the next round, nullifying B's gains. B knows this so they abstain from building. This is still extremely simplified but at least more applicable than your eco 101 version. Also neither Boeing nor Airbus actually build any engines and the Chinese do have access to modern engines so the fact that domestic manufacturers are 20 years behind is no draw on Comac. Sorry I really enjoy watching your videos but this one is full of errors (more than just the ones I mention here). Please improve your quality control.
@Lock24hi
Жыл бұрын
Another one leaves southern California!
@RobertCrandall-ce8gv
2 ай бұрын
I do not beleive any stealing involved. Documentaries if commercial aircraft, as well as model kits give very specific information 8n all types of aircraft, etc. Aircraft parts and manufacturing is done all over the world, so I think obtaining stats, info is readily available Bob
@skylineXpert
Жыл бұрын
I wont be surprised If they are. probably avionics & other key designs In order to be self reliant...
@golf94srm
Жыл бұрын
for both it's a way to increase production capacity at a lower cost!
@armchairwarrior963
Жыл бұрын
I rather fly a Chinese plane than a Boeing any day of the week.
@fattfatt6483
Жыл бұрын
THIS NOT STEALING, SHOULD BE CALLED FAIR COMPETITIONS ! MORE SURPRISES ALREADIED ON IT WAYS ! CHINA 🇨🇳 👍
@gt-lv3zo
Жыл бұрын
you include a clip of a China Airlines 777 in this video but China Airlines is Taiwanese. Air China is the mainland PRC airline. I'm sure China Airlines would prefer not to be inferred as being from the PRC or confused with Air China.
@ruemignon
Жыл бұрын
I rarely see anyone clarify this fact underneath a video about the appalling safety record of China Airlines. I am sure many people would prefer China Airlines to be associated with China in situations like this.
@Flanker-L
Жыл бұрын
@@ruemignon Last year, a Taiwanese killed 6 Taiwaneses in America, the news title is "Chinese killed Taiwanese". It's right because Taiwanese is also Chinese, but the title's intention...
@yogiahmad328
Жыл бұрын
There's no such thing as Taiwanese. The real taiwanese is ABORIGINAL TRIBE who lives in the island for tens thousand of years Small eye lip, yellow-white pale people is Chinese. They're Chinese who born in Taiwan island. That's it
@diollinebranderson6553
Жыл бұрын
@@Flanker-L bruh source?
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY-----------------if making of a plane can be copied, then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@nestorreyes5253
9 ай бұрын
yes, of course!
@andysandys.6825
Жыл бұрын
Remember when COMAC start develop 919 they joint with BOMBARDIER which at that time Bombardier sells CS 100 - 300. Now Bombard CS already RIP but CS series soul now fly in 919 & A 220. ...... "With Bombardier we'll go Boarding"........
@texassabre7214
Жыл бұрын
BS. Do you know how old 737 is? 67 years!
@keli4068
Жыл бұрын
air bus was helping COMAC to develop c919, in exchange China only ordered air bus plane for last 5 years
@leecrowley2101
Жыл бұрын
Oh I almost forgot to say have a safe and fun Memorial Day weekend. Take care of yourself.LeeCrolley,lll
@superman28607
Жыл бұрын
I think that even if comac gets boeing and Airbus IPs, both will only lose the Chinese market and that's it. Never forget the upbringing of Airbus. Unless comac makes some extremely advanced and efficient plane just like A300 when it first came out and giving away a couple of them free pf charge, they will struggle to disrupt the duopoly of Airbus and Boeing. Yeah we may see more comacs in western airports carrying Chinese airline livery, but it will take some huge gamble from comac to see western liveries on a comac
@horacewonghy
Жыл бұрын
CCP be like: now we made the plane, you airline must to buy a number of it.
@barkobummer
Жыл бұрын
Beauty is China don't care what the west thinks, it just carry on. meanwhile, U$ led west is always thinking there is no way China can catch up LOL, they forgot China built their own space station, chips, rail, Ai etc despite constant western sanctions. Meanwhile U$ led wester are thinking and spending tons of resoruces on, "how can we slow china down?", what a winning strategy. LOL
@rohitsinghyxrs
Жыл бұрын
@@horacewonghy isn't boeing and Airbus were doing the same thing till now... Ccp stays rent free in Western minds 😂😂
@yogiahmad328
Жыл бұрын
Well let's see pal. Looks like it need times for changing western mind. But it's possible! Just recently Elon Musk state that Chinese space ship is more advance then the rest of western and it's allies think 😊 By the way let enjoy the comac journey to the top
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY--------------if the making of a plane can be copied, then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@alphamalegold
Жыл бұрын
Can you do more COMAC videos
@PAC-fp9hy
7 ай бұрын
Is the world round?
@marcelfermer5369
Жыл бұрын
Of course they are! But greed has always had disastruous consequences.
@joeshaw5501
Жыл бұрын
I watched the video and assumed that you probably didn’t know that many COMAC engineers were trained in Boeing Wichita.
@Connor_Roush
Жыл бұрын
They copy everything. Absolutely disgusting.
@infoworld7706
Жыл бұрын
assembling an aircraft will disclose tech secret? if I am comac, I will buy one from boeing or aribus then i will get more tech secret.
@user-vibami
Жыл бұрын
My gut tells me, it will make planes safer for their people and loads of money coming west
@sportsMike87
Жыл бұрын
I’m surprised Japan or Korea hasn’t developed a mass market jet yet
@frozenuruguayball6436
Жыл бұрын
Since Mitsubishi is developing a plane and so is Honda we could see some Japanese aircraft
@peter0x444
Жыл бұрын
@@frozenuruguayball6436 Didn't mitsubishi leave this market?
@frozenuruguayball6436
Жыл бұрын
@@peter0x444 I don’t know actually
@MADHIKER777
Жыл бұрын
@@peter0x444 Mitsubishi made the Zeros used by Kamikaze pilots in WW2.
@peter0x444
Жыл бұрын
@@MADHIKER777 okay, but how is that relevant today?
@ariefbudi427
Жыл бұрын
If smaller country like Brazil can build good enough commercial aircraft, there's no excuse china cant do the same with enough time and investment
@Wbliss
Жыл бұрын
What a cry in distress from a western person, whining about the new Chinese commercial jet being produced domestically & questioning about quality & allegations of property theft or commercial spying and all those negative connotations from the usual quarter in the west . The design & production of a short range commercial jet are no trade secrets anymore these days as this western guy had made it out to be.! What’s a commercial jet looks like nowadays, where the plane displays one large airframe, two big wings, tail wings, rudder , landing gears, etc, So what’s the big deal for a country like China with the aviation technology, resources, skilled manpower & management to produce a commercial aircraft from scratch.? The C919 domestically produced plane is an introductory model for the domestic market , as a supplemental asset for China commercial market. The foreign producers, Boeing, Airbus would face some competition from Comac Inc. for China’s domestic market,while the prospects for foreign markets may yet be seem far away for the C919 at this point. As a reminder , China is the only Asian nation to produce & operating its own space station now, there is nothing in aviation that China can’t do efficiently. That’s the scary part for the west.!
@leecrowley2101
Жыл бұрын
Loved the video very much! Are you planning to move back to SFO. How are you enjoying Nashville? Take care Lee Crolley,lll.
@noahtramposh3350
Жыл бұрын
"Is china stealing (insert anything you want here)?" "Yes."
@evereachyu
Жыл бұрын
Assumption is the mother of all fxxk ups!
@eaglestar2962
5 ай бұрын
Every country on earth, not only China, but also European countries and USA, yearn for excellence and domination of technology. Including making advanced planes. However, look at WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) recent statistics. China has more innovations (patents) compare to any nation on earth. Look also on gold medals accumulation by country on International Math Olympiad, International Chemistry Olympiad, International Science Olympiad, International Physics Olympiad, and International Olympiad of Informatics. In the past 30 years, China somehow has beaten every country on earth by a great margin on those brain olympiads. You can check the facts easily on google or youtube.
@longbeach7623
Жыл бұрын
Is the sky blue? What modern technology in the post industrial age has China ever produced with original innovation?
@MetaView7
Жыл бұрын
Both Airbus and Boeing have repair and refurbish and partial production facilities in China for over 20 years.
@bazoo513
Жыл бұрын
Let me just say that monopolies (and oligopolies) are bad from the standpoint of consumers. Two relevant airliner manufacturers are far too few - I would prefer at least four. And I don't care for American protectionism masquerading as "ideological differences" when all other excuses fail. We are already seeing the beneficial influence of Chinese agility and low labor cost in the battery electric car market, in the way Japan had several decades ago in ICE car market. The more, the merrier!
@bazoo513
Жыл бұрын
@@marcmcreynolds2827 In a more competitive market somebody would fill the gap(s) created by Boeing blunders. Airbus has monumental backlog in their most successful program, so A320 series was unable to fill the 737 MAX gap, for example. There is no need for every manufacturer to fill every niche. True, new aircraft model development is now orders of magnitude more expensive than in the golden age of aircraft industry, although, frankly, I don't understand why, especially for airliners, where the technological advancements are _very_ incremental. The only radical advancement in the last several decades was glass cockpit and fly-by-wire (lifted from military programs; the former is now practically commodity) and materials (GLARE, carbon composite). OK, engines have also advanced quite radically. As for Chinese protectionism, sure, but they don't espouse the virtues of global free market, do they?
@marcmcreynolds2827
Жыл бұрын
"The more, the merrier!" As long as the market can support multiple providers. There wasn't enough money in mid-sized widebodies to support both Douglas Aircraft and Lockheed, for example. As for protectionism, China's home-market protections are legendary.
@cobytrains9568
Жыл бұрын
choo choo great video!
@NaumRusomarov
Жыл бұрын
china doesn't care that their tech is 20 years behind airbus and boeing. this won't matter if the planes end up being much cheaper than similar ones produced in the west. they'll sell. china needs airbus and boeing to teach them how to build planes fast. the moment they think that goal has been achieved the western manufacturers will immediately get the boot. this scenario has played many times over the past 20 years.
@d.b.cooper1
Жыл бұрын
Very fair analysis, the benfits still far outwigh the negatives. Maybe if they relocated entire key R&D departments it would be a story, but this is basic business sense that thankfully prevails in the mad political world we live in. Hopefully business can avoid bs wars
@pesawatindonesia
Жыл бұрын
superb mister 😍🤩
@johnsamuel1999
Жыл бұрын
I remember china stole the tech for high speed trains
@OhmUdomvanich
Жыл бұрын
China done technology transfer from many manufacturer not stole from them.
@johnsamuel1999
Жыл бұрын
@Ohm Udomvanich sort of they forced high-speed rail manufacturers to work with Chinese partners. They wanted Chinese engineers to also be a part of the process. Now they make their own trains. Theirs no way companies sold their tech willingly, they knew they would lose the Chinese market if they did
@johnsamuel1999
Жыл бұрын
@Ohm Udomvanich of course, western companies were quite naive and greedy
@cchotyoung
Жыл бұрын
3:55 If you have evidence, go ahead and file a lawsuit. If you don't, then refrain from making baseless accusations. Be cautious about accusing someone of defamation without proper grounds, as it may have legal consequences.
@jameslee4946
Жыл бұрын
All aircraft companies. They are still from each other. On the of top service. They Compete with each other. .Underneath.They're working with each other. You don't know that, right? Now you know. I worked in an aircraft company before.
@paraagshah4153
Жыл бұрын
That is a rhetorical question!
@sheldoninst
Жыл бұрын
Coby, I sincerely hope that whereever you moved to, that you do NOT vote as Californians do.. after all you ran away from high crime, ridiculous homelessness, super high taxes, and grossly overpriced living expenses, to name a few problems most impactful (though not unique) in CA.
@marcmcreynolds2827
Жыл бұрын
Something's overpriced if people aren't willing to pay for it. California costs more (the coastal areas, anyway) because people who have money would rather have less of it and live in California than hang on to it and be stuck somewhere that's got boring terrain and often-dangerous (or just miserable) weather. Which explains a lot of the "ridiculous homelessness" as well: If you're going to be stuck living under a tarp one way or the other, where would you want to be stuck? Hurricane alley? The frozen north?
@dharmharylallsingh4559
11 ай бұрын
Chinese people are smart and in 10 years they will manage it with AI.
@subhranshuganguly2246
Жыл бұрын
Why not open plant in India .
@edddiscaya47
Жыл бұрын
I think that Essie shoe is not made in China.
@loongdechuanren1008
Жыл бұрын
China is the only country that can build a larger quantity, so, imagine the eventuality especially if it has a newer version.
@georgiebestmanutd4746
Жыл бұрын
Condescending attitude. GI Joe has already prohibited chip sales to China; same issue w/ airplanes
@KingIstvan
Жыл бұрын
Living in Seattle?
@jacobwasserman9505
Жыл бұрын
Fascinating. And no i wouldnt fly a c919 yet
@undecidedgaming1432
Жыл бұрын
So which game theory episode are we watching😂
@yesnathan22
Жыл бұрын
Why its even a question ?
@TheGecko213
Жыл бұрын
It is one thing to copy and produce planes by China but a different thing to prevent it from falling from the skies due to sub-standard parts and avionics :))
@ruemignon
Жыл бұрын
No matter how safe the engineers tried to make a plane, they could not stop a psychopath like Andreas Lubitz from Germanwings.
@marcmcreynolds2827
Жыл бұрын
Mostly Western avionics, along with many other systems. I've seen a "60%" number for Western content.
@temle7489
Жыл бұрын
Why think and innovate if you can just send your thieves downloading data for a very short time?
@AbdulMutalibbinDuitMutalib
8 ай бұрын
Boeing 737?? The FAMOUS FLYING COFFIN!!!
@KET1979
4 ай бұрын
compromise safety and quality to meet schedule...You don't change your quality process for schedule. You make quality happen in the schedule-- thanks boeing
@jamestsavarangarusesabagin550
Жыл бұрын
China has woken up..They believed in themselves and got self motivation.China is not stealing from Boeing and Airbus
@MrPathorock
Жыл бұрын
steal? lol, all countries have rights to build anything they want, if they are capable
@catttcattt
Жыл бұрын
I hardly feel that the author of this video actually knows just how many components Boeing/Airbus parts are actually made in China, especially those of the engine. Someone from a supplier revealed in the Chinese equivalent Quora that there are few components of the engine that are actually not made in China. Sometimes, business is business. It is not entirely following the line drew by politicians.
@johhw_6432
Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍
@joey3291
Жыл бұрын
oh give me a break, the planes are already in their backyard for decades, what point are you trying to make???
@randomguy7175
Жыл бұрын
The world needs more options.. good wishes to China.. hope other nations build too..
@lingye-jv6rn
Жыл бұрын
I've seen an interesting case where China sells four kinds of shoes for $1, $10, $100, and even $1000, and a guy bought $1 shoes, found the quality bad, and started attacking all Chinese shoes, but no Found out it was because he could only afford $1.
@IftekharAhmedSarkar
Жыл бұрын
lol true
@kimchiba4570
Жыл бұрын
There are many such dumb mofos globally
@steviehaha
Жыл бұрын
It’s the Middle Men who procured cheap items to sell, you get what you pay.
@deonchen455
Жыл бұрын
😂 you literally hurt their feeling !
@fattfatt6483
Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂 a dollar for 1ooo dollar's product ?😂😂😂😅
@paulfollo8172
Жыл бұрын
Greed breeds stupidity!
@northernsamba7388
Жыл бұрын
Luthansa is bringing back the Air Bus 380. Why, because Boeing is having trouble shipping 787 and Max 8 due to quality problems.
@tomleesy
Жыл бұрын
I think it’s crucial to remember that Airbus and Boeing are producing/furnishing the A320 and 737 in China, especially because the short-hall market is dominant and key to Chinese aviation. Both of these aircraft have been updated but are older and built upon established technologies and production techniques, so despite the spying concerns neither Airbus or Boeing are giving away their big secrets about their new long haul jets like the A350/787, and as you said Coby, Comac still have a very long way to go to produce high quality planes consistently
@domkhay6991
Жыл бұрын
Every countries spied. USA is the greatest culprit of all. China didnt put a gun on the heads of Boeing and Airbus to have factories in China. It the other way around. What about the international space station which US banned China from it? China Tiangong will be the only one left in a couple of years. Hahaha, USA is down the drain, loser.
@wolfgangselle3272
Жыл бұрын
Still China has the advances to see how to build modern airplanes. China doesn’t invent anything .. they copy ( steal ) it around the world. Or buying companies to get the technology and the costumer.
@hanfucolorful9656
Жыл бұрын
From 0 to 1 is the hardest step, you got to start from somewhere.
@andrewlim7751
Жыл бұрын
Besides jet engines, nothing about A320 and 737 is a secret.
@wolfgangselle3272
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewlim7751 I would disagree … because this airplanes are longtime on the market and all “ secrets “ are already in the open. Secrets like the material of the body frame, or the wiring there are so many secrets. And of course also the production process is a “ secret “. And after ( for example ) Airbus open up a production line in China they got almost everything. And what is NOT a secret is that China steal all this stuff! And without western technology China would be nothing! Period!
@pappyd8417
Жыл бұрын
Of course they are just like Russia stole the shuttle among other things
@marcjohnson4884
Жыл бұрын
I hit up a head hunter link for aviation professionals interested in flying in China. Would love to score a free trip there. I love chinese food.
@yangguzheng3544
Жыл бұрын
China has educated labor at a much lower cost, why not? And the C919 anyway won't compete in the European and North American market any time soon. It's not a big risk letting people know how to assemble the fuselage and wing sections. COMAC eventually has to rely on its own aviation engineers to actually design a modern commercial airliner.
@johannessamuelsson6578
Жыл бұрын
I think Michael O'Leary said that he (i.e. Ryanair) would shift the B73M orders to C919 in wake of the groundings. Don't know how relevant that is today now that the MAX is flying again.
@yangguzheng3544
Жыл бұрын
@@johannessamuelsson6578 I believe he's happy about C919 mainly because Chinese airlines will probably leave the queue at Boeing and Airbus, so Ryanair get their 737s delivered earlier😆
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY-----------if making of a plane can be copied , then C919 would have come out 50 years ago
@yangguzheng3544
Жыл бұрын
@@sunnyuutinn EXACTLY. Aviation engineers wouldn't need so many years of painful education if a plane can be COPIED, like just put a pair of wings on the fuselage and some engines.
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
@@yangguzheng3544 those white and part white part jews & full jews keep saying "copy " "steal" on asians BECAUSE THEY ARE RACISTS they think far eastern / non -white people are stupid !
@fleipeg
Жыл бұрын
I think ERJ is in more danger than BOE or EADSF in the near term.
@quinnshumway4650
Жыл бұрын
Have you studied economics? That was literally a perfect explanation of basic game theory
@henrygeorge6388
Жыл бұрын
I disagree with your narrative that China 🇨🇳 will steal technology ,mind you China is only doing what they know how to do better and that is working very hard with perseverance and dedication not stealing from any body.. God bless The Great People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 Amen ❤❤❤❤
@bazoo513
Жыл бұрын
Strange that you haven't mentioned the case COMAC ARJ21, an aircraft with, shall we say, striking resemblance to MD-80/MD-90 which were produced _under the license_ (that is, with full design transfer, but nor necessarily production knowledge transfer) in China. Despite of having the all details of these aircraft design at their disposal, it took 14 years from the start of ARJ21 design work to entry into service (8 years after its first flight). It takes more than "paper knowledge" to build efficiently such a complex product.
@zegzbrutal
Жыл бұрын
Those 14years were actually time taken for the Comac to learn how to become a commercial manufacturer, and develop their Chinese suppliers. To be honest it's acceptable regardless of which country that is outside EU/US
@bazoo513
Жыл бұрын
@@zegzbrutal And with that initial step now out of the way, things are expected to move more rapidly? Possible...
@zegzbrutal
Жыл бұрын
@@bazoo513 should be, but my guess is the production rate won't increase for the coming 5 years. Expect China Eastern to give a lot of feedbacks to Comac for improvement in later batches.
@sunnyuutinn
Жыл бұрын
NO COPY -------if the making of a plane can be copied , then this C919 would have come out 50 years ago !
@ims3312
Жыл бұрын
Bombardier Inc had planned to develop a mid-size passenger jet, called the C Series, aimed at competing with Boeing and Airbus. The program began in 2004 with an investment of more than $5 billion, but the project suffered multiple delays and cost overruns due to technical and financial problems, leading the company into financial trouble. In 2015, Bombardier signed a C $1.3 billion agreement with the Quebec provincial and federal governments, receiving financial assistance from the government to support the project. In 2017, the C Series development completed the acquisition of a large number of US airline orders, Boeing filed an anti-dumping complaint against Bombardier, accusing the C Series program of improper government subsidies, resulting in a major blow to the program. In January 2018, the US Department of Commerce announced the imposition of anti-dumping duties of up to 292% on the C Series project, because the profit margin of Bombardier C Series project itself is not high, the price after sanctions can not recover the huge order before, the US government's anti-dumping sanctions and Bombardier company can not obtain profits When the CSeries was in crisis, Bombardier even wanted to move production to low-cost regions and discussed cooperation with ComAC and Shenyang Aircraft Corporation In 2018, under pressure from the U.S. and Canadian governments, Bombardier continued to sell shares, but it was difficult to sustain, and finally, unable to obtain cash flow, Bombardier sold the C Series project to Airbus Canada Limited Partnership, a unit of Europe's Airbus, for 1 Canadian dollar. The C Series was renamed the A220. Airbus has a factory in Tianjin, China, which mainly produces parts and assembly work for the A320 family of passenger aircraft, as well as parts for the A220. The plant began production of A220 components in 2017 and is now an important part of the A220 supply chain.
@lonelywolf159
Жыл бұрын
Your Chinese accent is too bad, the pronunciation of Tianjin and Zhoushan is completely wrong, and the location of Tianjin and Zhoushan on the map is also wrong.
Пікірлер: 803