@@universeisheregaming6400 1st: im a girl 2nd: im talking to the original comment
@ms.z980
6 жыл бұрын
ابن الهيثم ❤ الله يرحمه كان عالم كبير .. ان شاء الله يجي اليوم الي يطلع من بلداننا علماء بشطارته واكثر يرفعون الأمة
@isaiahbaggett2758
9 жыл бұрын
the bandage on Newton's head was a nice touch - anybody else catch that?
@yuuurawizzard
6 жыл бұрын
isaiah baggett what's its significance?
@dr.manoyanaucho7724
6 жыл бұрын
Don Jefé the injury caused by Apple falling on his head
@khurana6945
6 жыл бұрын
Dr. Manoyana ucho ....oh gr8 i noticed it bt couldnt make it out...
@nomnom112
5 жыл бұрын
@@yuuurawizzard I think it's the myth that newton had his moment of epiphany about gravity when he was sitting under a tree and an apple fell on his head.
@ycdcherokee
5 жыл бұрын
No, you are the only genious
@VAISHALISHARMA
5 жыл бұрын
Sometimes it behaves like a particle and other times it behaves like a wave . But it isn't exactly like either ! Video starts and ends on the same entangled question 👏
@HosamSultan
11 жыл бұрын
Colm Kelleher has a lot of lessons here... and they are the best always :) Thanks to him and to the creative animators...
@namanrajsingh6139
5 жыл бұрын
(Answer needed from TED ED itself) How light can act as a wave? (Because wave always requires a medium to move, just like a sound wave. And light also travels through vacuum). Does light contain any amount of physical matter? If light can sometimes be a wave, then can we believe in dark matter, present in vacuum to support the wave of light? How is light seen on microscopic level in a vacuum in contrast to a microscopic image of vacuum with no light? Or do I need to study something to get my answers?
@andrewli8173
4 жыл бұрын
Me trying to reply and ignore the fact it said only Ted Ed: Well it is- Mamta: NO
@namanrajsingh6139
4 жыл бұрын
@@andrewli8173 Thanks for your attention Andrew, but can you be more specific?
@evank3718
3 жыл бұрын
Petition to call it a wavicle
@manahilnaeem4416
3 жыл бұрын
Where is the usual narrator? His voice is so calming
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
Жыл бұрын
The simplest explanation is that light is a wave with particle characteristics as a probabilistic future unfolds photon by photon. This idea is supported by the fact that light photon ∆E=hf energy is continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons. Kinetic energy is the energy of what is actually ‘happening’. The dynamic geometry of this process forms an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future continuously unfolding relative to the electron probability cloud of the atoms and the wavelength of the light.
@John14-6...
3 жыл бұрын
With some of the amazing things the Greeks came up with it's hard to believe they thought that about light for a thousand years when there was no answer why it gets dark.
@Ginger_Hrn
4 жыл бұрын
Let's not goona neglect the fact that we are also wave & particle at the same time
@abbieq11
5 жыл бұрын
I asked this to my father when I was in 2nd grade and he laughed and said it would take too long to explain
@blauwbeer556
4 жыл бұрын
if after 10 minutes of explaining and you respond with a "huh?!" i would just say "ahh don't sweat it, maybe an other time."
@randomgoose3704
3 жыл бұрын
Do you have any idea how little this video satisfied my curiosity.
@sanjuansteve
7 жыл бұрын
Is it possible that a photon is a particle that acts like a wave because it has a dark matter particle orbiting it, pulling it into an axial wave motion as it travels? And that perhaps the only reason for photons' max speed limit is the dark matter they're paired with? That could explain the double slit experiment results with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector. This could also explain the deflection of the axis of the particle's wave motion moving thru polarizing filters rotated less than 45 degrees apart. This could also explain why the universe is expanding from the central Singularity point of the Big Bang outward in all directions faster than the speed of light into previously completely empty universe space, given that there is no Dark Matter there yet.
@fastestslowest1864
2 жыл бұрын
Hello, after a long time. Hope you are doing great. Did you get the answer? I appreciate your theory of presence of dark matter but how to decide when light will behave as a particle or wave and at what conditions?
@nevanjohn
Жыл бұрын
This is an interesting theory!
@sanjuansteve
Жыл бұрын
@@nevanjohn Thank you my friend.
@createdbeing302
Жыл бұрын
Interesting theory, but the issue is that electrons and other atoms also behave in the same way. Are they all too connected to dark matter?
@sapiens8billion
Жыл бұрын
Reasonable theory. On a side note for anyone....when is a photon a wave? Answer without referencing the double slit experiment.
@Tupster
11 жыл бұрын
You do know that the uncertainty principle isn't an either/or thing right? It is a gradation. So light is not either a particle or a wave, it is all gradations in between. It really isn't EITHER. But as I said before, I'm a computer scientist so I'm used to blurring the line between what things are and what they do.
@mrhadaray
11 жыл бұрын
This video really brightened my understanding
@michaelrasyad8684
3 жыл бұрын
The answer is simple. LIGHT IS LIGHT
@Ali_emad.01
Жыл бұрын
مين جي من كتاب م محمود مجدي
@Wldfyre1
11 жыл бұрын
Yeah, they really brightened my day.
@ABod-mas3oud
6 ай бұрын
رجاله عبدالمعبود ❤❤❤❤
@el-bosst.v9635
Жыл бұрын
رجالة عبدالمعبود
@gg_tube2038
3 жыл бұрын
Lights are photons emit waves as it travels so lights have properties of both waves and particals(photons) I think
@clark_cant
11 жыл бұрын
great great great! also, keep this guy, his voice is awesome!
@shivanshchoudhary6280
6 жыл бұрын
Aha, I understood what they are saying! But now I have a headache and i am feeling dizzy😵 So I think Qûâñtum theories can be understood and not understood at the same time. Gosh, what am I thinking!!😲
@bobjohnson6512
6 жыл бұрын
Is it an electrons oscillating field? It is a particle in that sense, but is also the movement of that particle.
@TrendFusion_X
Жыл бұрын
How many of you looking for answer in comments
@edenny55
11 жыл бұрын
EXACTLY! I was gonna post this same comment until I saw you said it first. It's a motion, not an object. It has no mass. Waveforms are a behavior of particles thus cannot exist on their own. So how can light be a wave with no particle? With no particle, there is nothing to wave! It's like asking why there is no wind in the vacuum of space! I love science but these TedEd videos have been irritating me. I was thinking they gear these towards kids, or think were STUPID. But this is just dead wrong
@thekkl
9 жыл бұрын
Can we accurately describe light as exclusively a wave or just a particle? No. Are the two mutually exclusive? Yes.
@slo74786
9 жыл бұрын
Exactly. I think one of the prime drivers for the discoveries made by Einstein was a forthright insistence on rational intelligibility. That's why he didn't like quantum physics. If our 'model' for what light is isn't rationally intelligible there's a simple reason:it's not correct (or, at best is incomplete)If you watch videos like this or videos about the double slit experiment you hear expressions like, 'this runs contrary to common sense' or 'despite what our intuitions tell us...'. Rather than acknowledging that there's a problem with our models: namely that they're rationally contradictory and unintelligible, the criteria of intelligibility get's obscured by downgrading it to a desire for 'common sense' or for things to follow our 'common-sense' intuitions. At the same time the irrational gets elevated to the point of being mystically inaccessible to our minds, but none the less, amazingly valid. What a crock. Something that's in 2 separate places at the same time doesn't quarrel with common sense, it defies reason. And there's an easy way to explain where we are (if not what's going on specifically). We've discovered phenomenon experimentally that we can't yet explain. We just have to admit that we don't understand the results, and don't have a satisfying explanation for them. Keep the results, discard the explanatory bit (since it doesn't make sense) and try again! Maybe the particles are riding waves that we cannot readily detect (like beach balls at a wave pool. I know that's a childishly uneducated guess, but the central point is that as long as we're cunningly satisfied with irrational explanations, there's no urgent impetuous to think creatively, shift paradigms and upgrade our explanations. In quantum theory, it seems like there's a kind of eccentric distinction to the irrationality of current explanations. Isn't the universe weird! the more bafflingly irrational the explanation is the better.
@Erik20766
9 жыл бұрын
Why would they be mutually exclusive?
@thekkl
9 жыл бұрын
Erik l For a particle the dimension, by definition, does not matter. For a wave it must. There are actually a lot of reasons though that something cannot exist for which the wave model and the particle model are accurate, and they are mostly of the form "It's this way not that way." The math we use to describe them is different. Therefore something cannot be both.
@thekkl
8 жыл бұрын
***** How?
@eneafrancesco
8 жыл бұрын
+Matthew Helm Imagine a boat gliding through an infinite lake. You could experience it as an object moving through space, but you can also measure the waves in the lake. I think we have a wrong picture about space being empty, it's more like a field, a 3D structure, and light is traveling through it, and the interaction with it causes this duality of wave/particle effects. But you can't separate the boat and the waves, they coexist and are part of the same action: light traveling through space-time. What do you think about this?
@samjohns7863
3 жыл бұрын
just ate a bagel
@fuckfrancisco
3 жыл бұрын
awesome ppppp
@brandonriley9457
5 ай бұрын
How was it?
@born-to-learn724
7 жыл бұрын
according to de brouglies dual nature of light hf=mc^2 . It means light is both particle and wavw
@LutherAAOO
13 күн бұрын
Very Informative !
@tegbirsingh3735
Жыл бұрын
This raises another question, what if there is something else other than a particle or a wave?
@schmetterling4477
11 ай бұрын
There are neither particles nor waves. We teach in high school that light is quantized.
@gdr1174
2 жыл бұрын
Well.. glad we cleared that up 😁
@SuperHeroR
11 жыл бұрын
I would watch this if it was 30 minutes longer, and got into more details. The shorten down version is vague, and it didn't really answer what "light" is.
@hannahnicole9547
6 жыл бұрын
What I learned from my teacher before is that light carries energy like a particle but travels like a wave. It's called "dual nature of light" something like that. Not really sure tho
@hannahnicole9547
6 жыл бұрын
It has something to do with Huygen's wave theory of light and with Thomas Young's double slit experiment in the 19th century (?) Not really sure, correct me if I'm wrong pls :)
@ritturana5223
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks to..".de brogliee"......he concluded..that like matter light also behave as particle as well as wave nature😎😎😎thanks me later after liking comments 😂
@limelightmoon
11 жыл бұрын
If anyone really liked this video, you should check out the film called "What the bleep do we know" it really explores a lot about light and how we the observer influence lout comes. I believe it's already on youtube
@sempiecush8386
7 жыл бұрын
If light is a wave, then it needs some material(fluid) to exist and travel. Just as ocean waves need water. What is there to 'do the waving motion' for light to exist as a wave???????????????????
@user-tv8oo3ko3o
7 жыл бұрын
Yvon-Sebastien Landais yes
@MC-mx1mt
7 жыл бұрын
Yvon-Sebastien Landais bro do you even know about electromagnetic waves?
@LHTansil
7 жыл бұрын
Mechanical waves like sound need a medium. Light does not. If that were not true, sunlight would never reach us from the sun.
@ianmacmillan6744
7 жыл бұрын
Aether
@jlo13800
7 жыл бұрын
the aether is the medium
@ozziew1z743
Жыл бұрын
I think we should stop thinking of light as a particle or a wave but rather neither and also both; we need a new term for light.
@cmd2tuts
11 жыл бұрын
Dd you notice how the yellow pencil was easy to bend but hard to stretch?
@secretunknown2782
3 жыл бұрын
This was my question too If light does not have any particles then how can light vibrate the atoms by hitting them
@schmetterling4477
3 жыл бұрын
By transferring a quantum of energy.
@harshitagarwal5188
7 жыл бұрын
what do we mean when we say "Light is wave"-is it that the light particle photon traversing the medium doing that wavy motion?
@james36091
11 жыл бұрын
It's a duality(both)! look at minutphysics' wave and particle duality videos.
@stephencabanilla7838
5 жыл бұрын
ILOVE YOU! TED ED!!!
@Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo
Жыл бұрын
Photons only exist where light is emitted or absorbed. Otherwise light is not quantized (a perfect wave).
@aharinparvin
5 жыл бұрын
You people are great! Keep doing and creating these amazing videos.
@unemployed756
5 жыл бұрын
Me : What is light a particle or a wave? TED : YES
@coki7472
2 жыл бұрын
they’re actually explained just fine
@southestst
Жыл бұрын
@@alireardon6664 they would literally have to explain quantum mechanics in an understandable way
@aerience
Жыл бұрын
@@alireardon6664 the explanation is okay, but indeed not detailed, as they have to keep it simple for everyone imo
@Angel-oq5bs
5 ай бұрын
WELL, IT IS BOTH . Because we can justify some optic phenomenums of light by saying that it's a wave; like refraction , diffraction, and reflexion. you can also justify the fact that light transforms energy to matters by saying that it's a particule. (sorry if I made some mistakes in english . i study MQ in french ;) )
@StuffByDavid
11 жыл бұрын
I'm glad they shed some light on this subject
6 жыл бұрын
That was quite the elucidation.
@jrhooman
5 жыл бұрын
hello from the world that exists 6 years after this comment
@aedenthegreatyt
5 жыл бұрын
*rim shot*
@gauveeberry2203
4 жыл бұрын
What a glowing review
@robenkhoury7079
4 жыл бұрын
@@jrhooman 😂👌
@supaflylob
6 жыл бұрын
Classic TED Is light a particle or a wave? Thats a good question **queue outro music**
@bradf.9365
4 жыл бұрын
I thought this was just me for a second. I was ready to pass the link along while watching, but then it just ended. I felt... shortchanged.
@mumtajkhan3085
4 жыл бұрын
Both light is wave as well as particle
@awr1001
4 жыл бұрын
This video answers the given question, then again it does not ...
@susmitachakraborty8245
2 жыл бұрын
@@awr1001 schrodingers video
@xpndblhero5170
8 ай бұрын
My question wasn't answered either.... 😑
@tendies
9 жыл бұрын
So we don't know what the fuck it is
@mountainmonkey15
9 жыл бұрын
It's a God Created occurrence
@itskelvinn
9 жыл бұрын
I dont know what it is, therefore god created it. We dont know things, therefore god exists. Christians disgust me
@mountainmonkey15
9 жыл бұрын
PapaKay lol not how we think
@ExperienceCounts2
9 жыл бұрын
I'm a Christian, Deal with it So you speak for all of Christianity? Wow. Such modesty. Appeal to ignorance and appeal to authority is *exactly* how Christians make excuses for the absolute disconnects between their supernatural world and the natural world the rest of us live in. Ignorance is knowledge. What is a soul? No Christian can say, but they "know" it exists. How do you tell which gods create the soul? No Christian can say, but they "know" it is their gods. Religious fallacy is the basis of Christianity and all other deistic faiths. You do know that's the difference between philosophy and theology, don't you? In philosophy, statements must be logically consistent. In theology, logical inconsistency, including outright contradictions like "we don't know, therefore we know" are permitted as "the will of the gods" any time and any place they are needed.
@ihategayass
9 жыл бұрын
+Jean-Luc Dushimiye it is both, it is energized particles; the form of energy is 'm kinetic. but I don't know what kind of particle, that is why I'm here
@TEDEd
11 жыл бұрын
That's the guy! He's also done a few others on the nuances of color and light.
@IDMYM8
6 жыл бұрын
just pin this comment.
@prabhsodhi5402
6 жыл бұрын
My M8 they will never dude😋
@koolcloud6177
3 жыл бұрын
@Varanus komodoensis e
@1A.....
3 жыл бұрын
😀
@Jesuisunknown
2 жыл бұрын
Why don't you pinning it
@bilibili68
8 жыл бұрын
that plaster on Newton's head is a brilliant detail!
@turing4991
7 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@turing4991
7 жыл бұрын
+ABHI The apple.😂😂
@hashansampath4066
6 жыл бұрын
Is that because of the apple??
@sarahsaleh4661
6 жыл бұрын
surely😝
@EdwinvandenAkker
6 жыл бұрын
I was just about to say that! Brilliant!
@jjsmith706
6 жыл бұрын
If you value your sanity, do not read the comments.
@AuraDevGen
6 жыл бұрын
AGREED
@juukeey3941
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for warning me
@dhawkeye4439
4 жыл бұрын
I think this is true for most videos’ comments
@i-See256
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@lemon-vy3mj
3 жыл бұрын
i lost my sanity a long time ago
@anuravsaini
4 жыл бұрын
Nature-What do you want to become light , particles or wave? Light -Yes
@Al-Hussainy
2 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by nature
@rithika5407
Жыл бұрын
Nature?
@hd_cat1197
9 жыл бұрын
The ending of the video says: "sometimes light behaves like a particle and other times it behaves like a wave", but that's not really an accurate definition of light. Light are packets of photons, so its energy is discrete. However, these photons are described by a wave function. Then, it's not correct to say that light sometimes behaves like a particle and sometimes like a wave, but it take properties of both concepts and its behavior is defined by these properties.
@aedenthegreatyt
4 жыл бұрын
@HD_Cat u have a large brain
@alvin83100
4 жыл бұрын
Photon acts like a particle! Light = photon Light acts like a particle too.
@yashagnihotri6901
4 жыл бұрын
According to me , Light (Photons) are accompanied by the wavefunctions which collapse differently based on the way the observations are made, thus if the observer is quite big ( As in Classical Physics ) the wavefunction collapses and thus we are able to witness particle nature of light and if the observer happens to be very small( As in Quantum Physics where slits are made unimaginably small) the wavefunction collapses to its other Eigenvalue which lets us see the wave nature of it.
@harshupadhyay2422
4 жыл бұрын
You said there same thing
@tigrayrimey6418
3 жыл бұрын
Your explanation really it make sense.
@parulaggarwal9405
5 жыл бұрын
1:53 I guess that APPLE fell on newton's forehead....
@that1828
3 жыл бұрын
You explain complex topics like this in such a fun and interesting manner which makes me want to love science and explore it 😀
@cxffaye
2 жыл бұрын
Samee
@janakjoshi7558
Жыл бұрын
believe me you dont want to
@davidschapiro8192
8 жыл бұрын
Light isn't sometimes that sometimes this. it's both! Wave and Particle, acting in Harmony
@yzhishko
8 жыл бұрын
Bullshit! Light is not particles at all. One experiment in video clearly shows that. Think about radio waves. They have the same nature as optical waves because they are oscillations of the same matter - physical field. But we don't assign any particles to radio waves. The optical light interacts with substances and our body a little bit different than any other waves. That's why it's so mysterious to modern science.
@notpickybutstrict9484
8 жыл бұрын
+yzhishko Bullshit!! You are and idiot!!! he said both ya moron which explains all experiments. it's a partial acting in a wave and that with any wavelength that is it extremely rare ( and talk about rare, its more likely that a superpossition will come out with another superposition. ) because the particles are moving in a wave so when they cross paths they miss the collision and when they do its not detectable.
@nSackStyles
8 жыл бұрын
absolutely incorrent.
@benciccarelli9870
8 жыл бұрын
manyakmami That Is stupid
@benciccarelli9870
8 жыл бұрын
manyakmami light has wavelengths that depend on the photons energy, photons inherently act as waves and move in a wave. That is why different sources of light can be different colors, they have different wavelengths
@kiprask
11 жыл бұрын
Gassendi said: "Light is a particle" Hooke said: "Light is wave" Planck said: "Why not both"
@oriontigley5089
4 жыл бұрын
"I dunno" -Ted ed
@amitsaraf6209
5 жыл бұрын
Quantum mechanics, god's plot hole in the universe.
@blauwbeer556
4 жыл бұрын
i know this is a joke but that happens everytime with things: "why do my patients die on me everytime i put a giant unwashed scissors in their bodies? must be god's plothole" or "why do rocks bounce off of water? must be god's plothole" or even "why do grounds all of a sudden sink? must be god's plothole" and everytime it is explained with science so what is different with this situation? but i have to admit it was a funny joke.
@mihirmehta9959
3 жыл бұрын
are you related to Aditya Saraff
@sujalgvs987
3 жыл бұрын
Or rather, a limitation of our mind; Just like how understanding integration is beyond a dog's limits
@hueyfreeman9504
5 жыл бұрын
It's just like water. Sometimes you get drops of water ( particles) and when you put them together , you get waves . Just my way of making sense of it.
@ExplosionKid570
4 жыл бұрын
That isn't the same thing. When you have a ripple in water, although the particles move up and down, they ultimately return to their original position resulting in a net 0 transfer of mass. However light physicaly travels from the source to its destination.
@Asmaa_311
4 жыл бұрын
Light is diffrent ...it's special
@manali6402
4 жыл бұрын
No definitely not😂
@kpop-lb3uk
3 жыл бұрын
Wiowoooooowww. Thats a good one😄
@Al-Hussainy
2 жыл бұрын
Asmaa اجل يا اختاه عندك حق
@tomisoetan9061
6 жыл бұрын
The animation on this is gorgeous! Like all ted Ed videos, about 50% of my attention is being awe struck by the animation
@ExploreLearnEnglishWithGeorge
4 жыл бұрын
Me: *Soo.. what is light?* Physics: *Yes*
@ExploreLearnEnglishWithGeorge
4 жыл бұрын
neither "particle" nor "wave" is not an answer to the question what the heck is a photon...what is an electromagnetic wave...what is it? What is it made out of? Strings of energy in the quantum field? I can't believe we've been pondering this stuff for well over a 100 years and we're stuck. I really sometimes feel like stuck in some George Lucas film about FORCE being the main protagonist...while nobody actually knows what that bloody FORCE is !!!?! Force = Energy ... potentials and spin and probability...I mean,as the saying goes 'if you think you understand quantum mechanics, then you really don't understand quantum mechanics@ - that is indicative where our science is atm...nobody seems to understand what we're made out of...other than "electromagnetic waves" or "energy" or "potential" .... perhaps the answer trully is in the "Simulation theory"
@YoussefAhmed-gn2pg
Жыл бұрын
محمود مجدي 👑
@razarasool_
7 жыл бұрын
What if light travels as photons in the form of waves?
@thespaceace8164
7 жыл бұрын
They'd still collide when two beams of light crossed each other, causing scattering which doesn't happen.
@michagrill9432
7 жыл бұрын
Top 5 The thing is it works with single atoms too
@mrsimmons9451
7 жыл бұрын
TheSpaceAce that's a pretty weak response. Water waves, which are made up of water molecules, do not scatter when interfering with each other, similar to how 2 or more light beams interact.
@thespaceace8164
7 жыл бұрын
What are you even trying to say?
@milolegends42
7 жыл бұрын
Isnt that basically like saying a chair in the form of a table therefore saying its actually a table?
@freddiebates4738
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you Colm. I've struggled with this concept for quite some time. Your explanation has helped to open the door to Quantum Physics for me.
@javiercobian9546
5 жыл бұрын
So are you a particle or a wave Light: yes
@ahamilton2528
4 жыл бұрын
Light is an energy which is itself invisible but makes other things visible.
@deepugami
3 жыл бұрын
then how are we able to see light rays
@quafshattaiyush2613
3 жыл бұрын
So we can say light is basically waves acting like particles ryt???
@cyanide6954
4 жыл бұрын
Short answer : both Long answer: both but not both
Light ruined my LIFE. This is why I love darkness.... ; p
@Ariadne4
3 жыл бұрын
But even darkness consists of light...
@rvp_sou8328
Жыл бұрын
Mr Mahmoud Magdy
@jojo.s_bekaar_adventures
4 жыл бұрын
4:01 "Well light isn't really anything we're used to dealing with our everyday lives." Well..., actually light *"IS"* something we're used to dealing with our everyday lives.
@user-di3vl9dp6o
4 жыл бұрын
He actually said 'Well light isn't really LIKE anything we're used to dealing with IN our everyday lives' 😅
@بوديعصام-غ2ر
6 ай бұрын
مين الجاي من عند مستر عبدالمعبود😂😂
@JomanaMahmoud-q3q
6 ай бұрын
من عند محمود مجدي بس انا اللي بحثت 😅
@aakashjoshi4580
4 жыл бұрын
After the discovery of photoelectric effect, Einstein showed that light is neither a wave nor a particle but a wave packet.
@mariam-ii4fb
7 ай бұрын
جيت اول واحده هنا 😂
@annaxia4338
9 жыл бұрын
Actually, all matter is both wave and particle. And all objects emit radiation (light), just in the infrared red spectrum
@sairachaudhary6870
4 жыл бұрын
Isn't a "wave" a wave of particles? Correct me if I'm wrong.
@somurambabu7221
Жыл бұрын
Guys guess why Newton has a bandage on his head Answer :- because he was known for his discovery of gravity and it was due to a apple falling on his head
@BingusKingus
6 жыл бұрын
2:52 Woah........ I feel dizzy
@ziadmohamed-uw8su
6 ай бұрын
اخوكم المراكم جاي من كتاب عبدالمعبود
@Killerking0-0-0
6 ай бұрын
انا مش فاهم النص التاني من الحصه دي
@ziadmohamed-uw8su
4 ай бұрын
@@Killerking0-0-0 حصة اي يسطا أنا لسا شايف الكومنت والله من شهرين 😂
@endsu
7 жыл бұрын
if u didn't watch the video yet, light is both a particle and a wave
@gritlup2089
5 жыл бұрын
Wave's and photon's do not exist it's impossible. Wave's of what? Look up Theoria Apophasis on KZitem, he also cover's extensively on Magnetism. The explanation's coming out of that guy's mouth with make your head fall off your shoulder's and flop on the floor
@unknownpeople2820
5 жыл бұрын
That's the exact reason this is called wave-particle duality. Yeah, i'm showing off as someone who learn quantum physics
@gritlup2089
5 жыл бұрын
Wave's and photon's do not exist it's impossible. Wave's of what? Look up Theoria Apophasis on KZitem, he also cover's extensively on Magnetism. That explanation's coming out of that guy's mouth with make your head fall off your shoulder's and flop on the floor
@Tupster
11 жыл бұрын
I'm also talking about individual particles acting like waves. That is because a wave is a behavior, not a thing. A particle actually never appears to be in multiple places. You will only ever find it in one place at a time. The waviness is in the description of where you expect to find it.
@djidji201
5 ай бұрын
This video's author lied about the greek theory of light. What he mentioned was NOT what Plato and Pythagoras said. The author of this video is a Liar.
@rubipanjiyar9531
4 жыл бұрын
Just wow. The way you explain is excellent.
@schmetterling4477
2 жыл бұрын
It's neither. It's a quantum field. It has been a quantum field since the 1930s. I know... it was the great depression and people weren't paying all that much attention to physics, so all of you missed the news back then. :-)
@nimehage
6 жыл бұрын
Light is neither a wave nor a particle. But it shows properties of either, depending on its energy.
@amandeepgill3382
4 жыл бұрын
Light is a wave made up of particles
@-_Nuke_-
9 жыл бұрын
A WAVE OF WHAT?? ?? ??
@gabri41200
9 жыл бұрын
Eletromagnetic
@-_Nuke_-
9 жыл бұрын
gabriel luiz That doesn't answer my question...
@gabri41200
9 жыл бұрын
wave of water
@-_Nuke_-
9 жыл бұрын
gabriel luiz haha still doesnt answer my question...
@dylankelly5511
9 жыл бұрын
CornerrecordZ Light is actually two types of waves oscillating perpendicularly to each other. One is electric wave which is formed by charged particles. The second is a magnetic wave that is formed by the movement of electrons. When these two waves oscillate perpendicularly to each other electromagnetic waves are formed.
@Kozan007
Жыл бұрын
“What do you know about quantum mechanics?” “I have a grasp on the basics” “ then you’re doing it wrong “ “ is light made up of particles or waves ?” “Quantum mechanics says its both-but how can it be both “ It-can?!” “CAN’T” “But it is- it’s paradoxical and yet it works”
@schmetterling4477
11 ай бұрын
But if you had listened in school then it would be crystal clear. You just didn't. ;-)
@maccyio1327
8 жыл бұрын
Can we at least make a new name of what light really is? Like.. something that behaves like a particle and also like a wave but is not a particle nor a wave.
@SrVazz
8 жыл бұрын
It's called electromagnetic wave
@maccyio1327
8 жыл бұрын
awesome...
@Small_Vocaloid_UTAU
8 жыл бұрын
Then what do you call electrons? These behave like waves when not observed and they behave like particles when observed.
@inox1ck
8 жыл бұрын
Ok I get it. it is a pwave , a parve or quantumwave you name it. Both e- and photons are qwaves.
@danielk2834
7 жыл бұрын
it's called a wavicle
@d.william8181
5 жыл бұрын
Listen the song : Waves Of Light - Brian Cox
@nesseihtgnay9419
5 жыл бұрын
Light is a wave-particle. When you observe it light it acts like a particle, but when you don't it act like a wave. It's just how quantum reality works.
@gritlup2089
5 жыл бұрын
Wave's and photon's do not exist it's impossible. Wave's of what? Look up Theoria Apophasis on KZitem, he also cover's extensively on Magnetism. That explanation's coming out of that guy's mouth with make your head fall off your shoulder's and flop on the floor
@Al-Hussainy
2 жыл бұрын
That's not reality first it makes absolutely zero sense second that's how science works people act they discovered the secret of the universe until a guy comes some 100 years later to say that everything we thought is wrong and light turns out to be one totally different thing and obviously all of us will be wrong in the future
@Al-Hussainy
2 жыл бұрын
Human brain has limits just like your sight has limits you can't try to understand everything physics isn't the ultimate reality it will never be perfect we just try to understand as much as we can to help us in our lives but good luck trying to explain reality
@davidwalker5054
Жыл бұрын
Who decided it has to be either a wave or a particle. it is what it is and is beyond explanation. The universe and nature are under no obligation to make themselves easy for our brains to understand or to act and behave like we want them to or expect them to
Пікірлер: 1,6 М.