I bought an R10 as a beginner when it came out. I switched to a second hand Sony A7 III at relatively high cost due to the lens situation and I've already saved more on lenses than it cost to switch. Maybe in a few years when 3rd party lens lineups and the 2nd hand market have had time to flesh out. Also, Canon's product stack is very obviously stripped down to push people to more expensive options. Its a shame because my family has literal generations of Canon brand loyalty but that's what you get when you put your shareholders first.
@Janggut40
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the review.
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@Ansonandco
2 ай бұрын
Cool little camera! Even better photographer 😉
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
thanks dude!
@josea.santos6988
Ай бұрын
Hi, great review. The 270 ex canon flash will work on my Canon R10.
@PavSZ
Ай бұрын
thanks! good to know!
@blackiconstudios
26 күн бұрын
you're the 1st person to see duin studio shoot with the Canon R10 and after watching this I'm quite impressed with the results despite it being underated
@PavSZ
25 күн бұрын
Thanks! It is OK camera for the money. Really capable despite being the bottom of the range model
@blackiconstudios
25 күн бұрын
@@PavSZ Can you do another studio shoot with the R10, just a Request 🙏🏽 please
@PavSZ
24 күн бұрын
@@blackiconstudios I'd love to but I do not own this camera. I had it on loan for awhile
@KingfisherSeven
2 ай бұрын
Interesting - thanks!
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching
@sanjaybali1021
2 ай бұрын
Where do u put the R50? Seems to close to the r10 and much cheaper.
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
yes, I'd put R50 at total beginner, amateur market. R10 is just a touch better overall in my opinion
@choppergirl
Ай бұрын
Only interested in 16:9 1080p 30fps recording, so kinds swxs you glossed over literally the only thing that matters to a KZitemr. One big negative seems it's not supported by the Magic Lantern project. Which means whatever crippled firmware Canon is on there is what you get.
@PavSZ
Ай бұрын
I'm a full time KZitemr and 16:9 1080p 30fps has never mattered to me. Why is that important to you?
@choppergirl
Ай бұрын
@@PavSZ All my KZitem videos are shot in 1080p 30fps. Most desktop computer monitors are 1080p. Literally, on a smart phone, nobody is even going to watch anything at a setting higher than 360p. Why? Cellular data costs $$$, and is going to choke on buffering higher resolutions over wifi.
@PavSZ
Ай бұрын
@@choppergirl I record everything in 4k but edit in 1080p but export in 4k YT likes 4k uploads, they are less compressed than 1080p ones. Also YT serves users on smart phones lower quality so people do not waste data.
@choppergirl
Ай бұрын
@@PavSZ My 16 core 32 thread Ryzen 7950x would choke on 4k footage because I stack clip on top of clip on top of clip. I'd need a 5,000 dollar Eypc CPU to edit in 4K and get no benefit from it all, and eat up harddrive space like you wouldn't believe. Nobody watches anything in 4K. Nobody on my block including me has a 2.5K or 4K monitor or TV (and I've got 150 computers in the barn going back to the 1970s... this is tech central). Even on the desktop with three 1080p monitors, I don't watch YT videos in 1080p... usually in 144p to 360p. Comcast limits your bandwidth to 1.2 terabytes a month, and with 5 people on my wide area network, we barely come under the limit every month. While I was blind for 5 years, I watched everything in 144p the absolute lowest YT bandwidth. The sound track carries most of the content information people are listening to. If you're going to splurge on excess bitrates, put it there, not in higher video resolutions or frame rates. Try it sometimes... click on a talking head video, or anything else, and go walk away and sit on the couch to listen to it from across the room. You still get almost entirely what the video is about. Only if there are screenshots or diagrams on the video do you really need to see what's going on. Hard to say as a video editor, but true. The video portion of a video is the least valuable.
@ivanstanusic9341
10 күн бұрын
I found offer for 888 euro with RF-S 18-45mm is it worth it?
@PavSZ
6 күн бұрын
yes! R7 is a little better overall though
@winstonseb7706
2 ай бұрын
idk man, I felt the fuji is more worth it
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
which one?
@winstonseb7706
2 ай бұрын
@@PavSZ fuji xs10 & xh1, maybe they are more to video focus, but they gave more features
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
IS VERY HARD TO FIND ANYTHING THIS GOOD IN THIS PRICERAAANGE! A7RIII?
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
are you for real? Of course there will be something costing this or less that is older and out of date
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
@@PavSZ maybe you should point consumers in a better direction.
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
this thing costs more tha an old ZVE10 that does 4K 60
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
you sound like an expert. I'm sorry that I ofended you with my personal opinions. Canon holds majority of market and most of new comers go for Canon because that's the brand they have heard about. Anybody already invested in Canon lens will not look into Sony, ever. ZVE10 is a totally different camera to this. I don't know why you even bothered watching it or commenting on it. It's obviously not a camera for you but thank you for your comments and helping me out overall. Love you
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
@@PavSZ at least it can mount 300 different lenses instead 30
@luismendesfilms
Ай бұрын
zve10 does not do 4k 60fps, canon R10 does! zve10 does not have a viewfinder, R10 does! Cano R10 does 15 to 30 continuous shots per second, zve10 does not!
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
any really interesting thing aroun here?
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
wow! thanks for another comment. Please watch another 100 of my videos and do the same. Much appreciated!
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
@@PavSZ Please make a video saying how fantastic is the R5mkII and prise why is better than a Z6III or and a7rV wich are same price range when both together (with a couple of 7artisans af lens too a50mil on the Z and the 85 on the E) Hahahaha
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
no I don't buy any camera. no thank, there are no lenses for that mount in apsc, so if I need a 35 I need to buy a ff 24 1.8 Please don't fool us
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
no lenses for that mount? they are all RF mount lenses. Same mount. There will be more RF-S lenses coming out for sure and Sigma and Tamron are starting to make Canon lenses too.
@knnry
2 ай бұрын
@@PavSZ there are no RF lenses for apsc, in Canon, I have to buy FF counterparts. Sorry but pushing apsc Canon to consumers is not fair, even if the sensor delivers. Are you short of ideas? Canon left its apsc budget compartment so alone that asked Sigma for the 18-50. 18 45 kit 55-210 18-150 a bounch of manual lenses pergear 25? TT 35 and 50 7artisan 12 and 24 (all because their precious ficus algorithms could be reverse engineered) I think I listed em ALL This is advertisement. Good bye
@PavSZ
2 ай бұрын
@@knnry wow you are so clever. Well done! Google what advertisement is.
Пікірлер: 39