In today's video; ''Is the Original Lens Better? Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM vs. Mark II'' we're going to tackle a topic that's been on everyone's mind: the showdown between the original Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens and its successor, the Mark II version. 📷💥
Now, here's the kicker - the Mark II lens comes with a hefty price tag, nearly 4,000 Australian dollars! That's right, it costs even more than the renowned 70-200mm GM f/2.8 II. So, the question is, are the improvements really worth the premium you'll be shelling out?
Join me as we take a closer look at these two lenses, scrutinising every aspect from sharpness to bokeh, low-light performance to build quality. We'll also discuss how the Mark II's enhancements, while existing, might just be more marginal than you'd expect.
We won't just tell you what to think; we'll show you. Get ready for side-by-side image and video samples, along with our candid opinions and discoveries after putting both lenses through rigorous testing.
Whether you're a professional photographer or a dedicated hobbyist, this comparison video is here to help you make a well-informed decision when it comes to your wide-angle lens choice for your Sony camera. 📹🔍
Before we dive into the details, make sure to hit that "Subscribe" button and ring the notification bell so you won't miss our in-depth gear reviews, tutorials, and photography insights. And of course, share your thoughts in the comments section below. Are you leaning towards the original 16-35 GM or considering the Mark II despite its premium price tag? I want to hear from you!
Thanks for watching, I look forward to navigating the world of optics and photography together.
Негізгі бет Is the Original Lens Better? Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM vs. Mark II
Пікірлер: 13