He isn't answering the question of "Being" but rather explaining how he would approach the question. This is exactly what I needed. It's so simple, but our brains go for the most complex way to address our existential angst and get lost in the thought. Thank you, Mr. Derrida.
@xyz-tl3qs
7 жыл бұрын
this video shows how deeply he is influenced by Levinas, the trace, the violence of language (the said) and so on, are themes of Levinas's philosophy
@theory_underground
Жыл бұрын
exactly what I was thinking!
@DermochelysCoriacea
11 жыл бұрын
This is excellent. I love the way Derrida thinks. He has the unique ability to really get at that essential thing. The great thing is: it is accessible to anybody.
@WolfAndLamb3
3 жыл бұрын
Quite the contrary -- His whole point is that we can never get at "the essential thing;" it is accessible to no-one.
@vvviiixxx8745
3 ай бұрын
not sure whether to differ, or to defer. (with regard to the above comments)
@user-vv4lo5yz3h
2 жыл бұрын
Thinker way ahead of his time 🙏
@jakecarlo9950
3 жыл бұрын
Fuck yeah, that's awesome, thanks (a dozen years later... yow). That's an outtake? Jesus, that's the most I've ever felt like I understood what my man is up to. Thanks again to the past you that is something other than the modified present you. ;)
@Lovesock69able
9 жыл бұрын
"Blame everything on Plato and the rest of get away with the whole she-bang." (No doubt)
@TheGuiltsOfUs
2 жыл бұрын
POWERFUL
@Lovesock69able
9 жыл бұрын
"So then, his ideas are correct as pre-conception, but untrue as examined, conceived of, or iterated by voice." (Irony)
@garvisdead
Ай бұрын
baba Derrida! thoda tham jaao 🥲
@jipangoo
Жыл бұрын
This sums up the whole Derrida thing. Read The question concerning technology and there you have Derrida.
@Lovesock69able
9 жыл бұрын
"Why? Your ideas, dear Sir." (Irony)
@Lovesock69able
9 жыл бұрын
"Who's ideas?" (Plato)
@Xavyer13
2 жыл бұрын
L'effect
@edcify8241
Жыл бұрын
c'est moi
@mr.tamimi8854
Жыл бұрын
Poor Derrida, he must've been an overthinker who can't sleep, sometimes it's more efficient to understand and see the truth when you just believe without questioning too much. Reality is of a major question itself rather than the existence or being, the best thing to do is just to be a believer.
@edcify8241
Жыл бұрын
?
@theory_underground
Жыл бұрын
You're the one we feel sorry for... so scared of thinking you're worried you would lose sleep 😅
@AlexanderVerney-Elliott-ep7dw
2 жыл бұрын
Derrida has no ontological understanding of Being becuase Derrida is without Dasein as we witness 'here' with Derrida not being 'there'. Derrida has no presence of the present unable to be present unable to come to presence: Being is not 'interpreted' as Presence: Being is Presenve.
@georgholden3735
6 жыл бұрын
every video i watch of derrida he has nothing intresting or original to say.
@philosphorus
2 жыл бұрын
That's because you don't get it.
@philosphorus
2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I know very little French, but from what I think you said... You have to understand what he is trying to explain... It is very hard to do by trying to add it all up together.
@philosphorus
2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I think the point is thought itself.
@philosphorus
2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I think so. His whole point is really in understanding just how different something can be if framed/phrased in a certain way. It makes perfect sense to me, but it is difficult to put into words, which is why so many hate Derrida lmao
@spritualelitist665
2 жыл бұрын
You can only understand Derrida if you understand and grasp Hieddeger. You can only truly understand Deleuze or Baudrillard if you understand Nietzche. Also Marshall Mcluhan in some ways.
Пікірлер: 30