Joe has temporarily giving up ownership for this show. Haha
@ColtonPhillips
5 жыл бұрын
I need to get me a Jamie
@xiiinosceteipsum
5 жыл бұрын
Jamie is as jamie does.. Mrs Blue.
@JohnStockton7459
5 жыл бұрын
Nigga u gay
@ridhvikgopal8912
5 жыл бұрын
I think the only person other than Joe to master the "Jaime pull up the video of the X doing Y" is Neil Degrasse Tyson
@fibsniper786
5 жыл бұрын
"Take another puff, my friend, because it's worth it."
@CytotoxinK
5 жыл бұрын
I might pop a mushroom cap to see what's up.
@dunhillshow5614
5 жыл бұрын
now back to Joey Diaz fart stories
@RR-hx7nj
5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@christianjames6297
5 жыл бұрын
"Listen dawg... I let out a fart one time back in 1988"
@lordjmme303
4 жыл бұрын
"Let me explain this to you cuz you need to understand. THE SMOG MONSTER!"
@TehUltimateSnake
4 жыл бұрын
Christian James “do ya undastand me cawksucka??”
@davidking3729
5 жыл бұрын
When he's not tripping people out with confusing riddles.. He sits around watching 3 TV's each playing a different matrix movie in a 760 degrees rotating chair...
@alonzokincaid1362
5 жыл бұрын
David King that would determine the derivative of the secondary electromagnetic linguistic curvature which simply equates to speed. The polyinclusive nature of the matrix is revealed in spinorial matter.
@scottysatpanalysis
3 жыл бұрын
@@alonzokincaid1362 😂
@kindle139
5 жыл бұрын
I like how his ‘simple’ explanation starts of with “so when you’re doing differential calculus...”
@arturczerwinski2616
4 жыл бұрын
It just sounds weird, but I've had it in my 3rd grade of high school and it's pretty simple and very useful math. You won't use it in everyday situations, but knowing about it changes how you perceive a lot of things both in math and in physics. Just what Weinstein says: "we lack language" AND what Rogan says "I lack tools" meaning really "I lack the instinct" are both true: it's hard to discuss certain things without differential calculus just using English, and I suppose it's more and more true in the realm of really advanced math and physics that you need to know some really tough things from modern math to get a grasp of anything, and you don't just get exposed to it by education system because of lack of time. Back to differential calculus, as you see there are countries that teach that in high schools (though not anymore in my country's case) and some don't. Somehow it's sad, as it's really nothing like some novelty, it was invented around 350 years ago. So... people like Weinstein and his colleagues are kind of blocked from spreading their knowledge - or suppositions even - to the broader public.
@DefiantStorage1009
3 жыл бұрын
You're right, it's adorable that he thinks Joe Rogan has ever taken calculus.
@evanw7878
3 жыл бұрын
Differential calculus is a joke
@dr.michelleevamorholt1538
3 жыл бұрын
thank you for making me laugh out loud :) Feels good!
@owenedwards9807
3 жыл бұрын
I mean on the scale of complexity we're talking about here differential calculus really is as simple as 1+1=2
@-_Nuke_-
4 жыл бұрын
Another way to understand Gauge Symmetry is this. I have an electron here (call it A) and I say "I call my A electron negatively charged" You have and electron there (call it B) and you say "I call my B electron negatively charged" The problem arises when I measure the charge of your electron from my perspective and based on my definition I find it positively charged and you do the same for my electron and you too find my electron positively charged. So when I measure the charge of my electron is negative but when you measure the charge of my electron is positive! If there is a way for you to understand why you made that "false" measurement you can derive a function that explains your weird result, that function will be Gauge Symmetry, there is a symmetry between my local space and your local space that makes us disagree on our measuring results, but now that we know that function, we can apply it and "fix" our measurements. Same thing apply to General Relativity, where to different observers measure different times or different lengths of the same clock or the same object, Einstein's equations are that function that shows those 2 different observers how and why they disagree on these measurements, and the reason is Gauge Symmetry. Therefore we understand that charge, time and space are arbitrary and can have any value locally if some Gauge Symmetry allows it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Another example is the photon. We know the Earth is round but a photon traveling at the speed of light will see the Earth perfectly flat, so what is the true shape of the Earth? Nothing, its arbitary or It's that visualisation that Eric Weinstein showed in the video, a 4 dimensional Earth that will look both round and flat based on our perspective and our speed.
@charc4819
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This is the first explanation I have read where the 'lightbulb flash' moment happened. Thank you so much. Brilliant explanation.
@jimjaspers2804
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@jimjaspers2804
4 жыл бұрын
Bravo, I've been trying to understand that for a while now and that was a great simplification.
@marv5078
4 жыл бұрын
I think I understood a little better now
@bambaking6265
3 жыл бұрын
Smart man
@ricecrash5225
4 жыл бұрын
I completely understood every word. Please don’t ask me any questions, I have nothing further to add.
@darrenwalshe8513
4 жыл бұрын
😆😆😆
@epicenterbasshd9636
Жыл бұрын
Shit is intense and the actual feeling of understanding is very real its like looking at different relative dimensions with different infinities 720° of infinities
@joseinteriano4417
5 жыл бұрын
when does the English version come out?
@TubsO2800
5 жыл бұрын
in about 720 degree and 2 flat globes forever turning into each other
@TubsO2800
5 жыл бұрын
StormyWeather hmmm I won’t judge the guy until I actually know the literature and physics, I’m fucking 17 and tired watching this shit, I doubt he meant to get that idea in my head, I think he just wanted to peek Rogan’s mind and just tell him that there are things that scientists have found that are beautiful and foundational to the universe but no one cares to seek them out
@gbalfour9618
5 жыл бұрын
I studied physics in college and to be honest I started getting lost haha.
@danzeljohnson3341
5 жыл бұрын
Noah Overholt j
@NorHeadHunter
5 жыл бұрын
@@gbalfour9618 Did you get an A?
@markyaus2011
5 жыл бұрын
This guy’s haircut looks like that Planet Hopf graphic
@dexzero
5 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@jewfrogabe19
4 жыл бұрын
Damn
@agentoranges
4 жыл бұрын
Dude's got rockstar hair
@TheMilwaukeeProtocol
3 жыл бұрын
Sexy Jewish hair.
@mustafahaq100
3 жыл бұрын
LOOL
@jopo7996
5 жыл бұрын
Oh. I thought gauge symmetry was how nicely your dashboard is laid out.
@AvengedSevenfold956
5 жыл бұрын
Funniest thing I’ve read in a while
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992
5 жыл бұрын
Gay
@mcnizzzle3961
5 жыл бұрын
this wasn’t funny but i still laughed. it was a 720 degree joke
@samt1705
4 жыл бұрын
😂
@BigMacMick
5 жыл бұрын
Joe "i might pop a mushroom cap and see whats up" Rogan
@DiligentChild
5 жыл бұрын
Came to comments hoping for this. Bravo.
@TheTruthTeller99
5 жыл бұрын
Joe getting the one chance to learn something incredible and gets distracted by the highest mountain
@msmurk2011
5 жыл бұрын
For real. Joe gets caught up on the weirdest shit thats usually not even significant. His ego is huge and he has to find any lane he can to impose his view. Even if it means being devils advocate about the dumbest fucking shit.
@wade8537
5 жыл бұрын
de marques you escalated that quickly
@michaelm3691
5 жыл бұрын
@@msmurk2011 Who pooped in your cereal bowl? Joe is far more curious and non-judgmental than the vast majority of people.
@donquixotedoflamingo5510
5 жыл бұрын
@@msmurk2011 I don't think this is an ego thing at all. Joe probably has an ego, but he checks it at the door to learn from his own guests since he's a very curious and open-minded individual. Sharing your own view and having a friendly discussion about it doesn't make you egotistical. This is a podcast not an interview.
@msmurk2011
5 жыл бұрын
His ego is fucking huge guys idk how you dont see it. He is extremely defensive of himself and is very adamant about aggressing his view when he thinks hes right. Im not saying hes not curious.. and he is non judgmental a lot of the time
@tear728
5 жыл бұрын
A bit too technical for Joe. I'm not saying he is dumb either. Its just Eric is talking about things that require very specific domain knowledge. If you don't know calculus or linear algebra he might as well be speaking gibberish, although Eric does an okay job conceptualizing it.
@tear728
5 жыл бұрын
@@lachyt5247 That's what I mean. If he doesn't understand limits then he won't understand the idea of the derivative. There is a whole bunch of prior domain knowledge one needs, otherwise one won't really be able to understand it. If he doesn't know basic matrix operations he wont know that ab = c is not the same as c = ba. I think Eric explained it okay enough although a little needlessly complicated with the pay raise analogy. It's basically like if Joe was trying to explain technical martial arts to Eric. He would probably be just as lost.
@tear728
5 жыл бұрын
@Regular Apistevist Basically same here. I study mostly linear algebra and calc on a regular basis but I find when I try to talk about it with people that don't understand it, they truly can't relate to what I am saying. Its literally like speaking in a different language. I just don't know if it was the greatest topic for Eric to discuss, although I found it interesting. Even then, I don't study physics so I'm only slightly more informed than Joe when it comes to what Eric is talking about lmao.
@DCFusor
5 жыл бұрын
@@tear728 I do study both physics and math...and I didn't "get it" or...he wasn't quite there with it. That said, sometimes you can't simplify things to the extent the "general public" can easily "get it". Ask Einstein, Schrodinger...and so on. I do fusion work, and after simplifying it as far as possible for some media person - which might take 15 minutes, they then ask for one sentence containing words of one syllable or less, and sorry, you just cannot get there. Well, that's press-release science, they get there, but it's effectively telling lies via skipping all the important truths.
@mogur00
5 жыл бұрын
@Regular Apistevist lol jesus christ ... did you just call Eric a dickhead, accuse him of showing off, bullshitting people, and attacking other physicists? fail.
@mogur00
5 жыл бұрын
@@seren3797 his name is Eric. Bret is his brother
@glennedwardpace3784
4 жыл бұрын
Joe: “Is Everest the highest?” Me: No Joe, YOU’RE the highest.
@kinbolluck476
11 ай бұрын
You can probaly chew hard enough to break your teeth if you wanted to
@JoeGamer81
5 жыл бұрын
"Okay Joe, this is the most important thing in the history of the universe, so listen closely: The spheroidial modial vortices represented above in Figure A renders the quantum fendium geodicic structure redundant on a macro scale. Think of it like this -- imagine you have a cup of coffee. Inside that cup of coffee exists the entire ordo-axiomatical nuon particulate substrate. Now throw that cup of coffee against the wall using only your mind. See? Akido masters may deny the dominance of the UFC, but their luboxial preturbations can't hide in the chunt field matrices. That shit Krause was spouting about squares on a chess board was fucking retarded. In two hours you could have a PhD in this shit."
@e99fuy0ng
5 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@arkoraa
5 жыл бұрын
now it all makes sense
@albinothug
4 жыл бұрын
JoeGamer81 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@lordjmme303
4 жыл бұрын
I don't know many of those words but I think I understand the difficulty of trying to explain a graphic like that using examples or layman's terms. You can't even compare quantum to the macro level. They are not the same even if some of the words describing quantum phenomena are the same as "regular" physics. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
@Moreoverover
4 жыл бұрын
This is too good
@TheMilwaukeeProtocol
3 жыл бұрын
I've been listening to Eric for awhile, and I've finally figured out, especially during technical discussions, he tends to switch reference frames a lot (e.g., talking about the subject and then suddenly talking about talking about the subject), and once I noticed that, it's been significantly easier for me to follow his speech. Still not *easy*.
@-KillaWatt-
5 жыл бұрын
Jamie got an A in physics but when the topic comes up he never says anything.
@RealisticIndustries1
5 жыл бұрын
Because he's all about doing his job and not blowing up his own spot. Jamie a lowkey badass
@Thatotter223
5 жыл бұрын
Gauge symmetry is a mathematical theory based on quantum physics, physics is separate from this idea; I believe.
@JimmyTurner
5 жыл бұрын
I'd say because there's a big difference in getting an A in a class and being an expert.
@christianjames6297
5 жыл бұрын
@@Thatotter223 you believe correctly.
@blakegreene4525
5 жыл бұрын
I could be wrong but I believe he only took intro physics. If you've been to college you know that an intro class doesn't make you an expert on the subject, although he might be knowledgable.
@Mac-tz4wn
4 жыл бұрын
6:32 - 6:35 is every viewers face when looking at that model 😂😂😂😂😂
@davidhorn7998
4 жыл бұрын
XD
@Adam-ui3yn
5 жыл бұрын
When your girl trying to argue with you but you hit her with the "not so fast, I know Guage theory" 8:00
@epicenterbasshd9636
Жыл бұрын
You hth to the maxx ima tell my girl that, un-ironically
@Christopher-hy5pu
5 жыл бұрын
Joe "is Everest the highest?" Rogan
@roddyrodrodrod
5 жыл бұрын
Joe's a dumbass.
@mursuka80
5 жыл бұрын
Imagine being over 50 years old and not knowing highest mountain in the world. American education at work here.
@TehUltimateSnake
4 жыл бұрын
Martti Hänninen imagine getting mad over nothing.
@JoeGamer81
5 жыл бұрын
I bet Harvey Weinstein could explain spinners.
@SThrillz
3 жыл бұрын
I can see Eric's words literally flying over Joe's head, just bouncing off all that in-glorious baldness 🤣🤣🤣
@tchrisou812
5 жыл бұрын
"Take another puff my friend, because it's worth it." Eric Weinstein 2018
@JJSMJ
2 жыл бұрын
"lay off the weed" - also Eric Weinstein 2018
@tchrisou812
2 жыл бұрын
@@JJSMJ lol balance is key
@JJSMJ
2 жыл бұрын
@@tchrisou812 True I smoke immediately after work and not a second early
@tchrisou812
2 жыл бұрын
@@JJSMJ that works
@thebenefactor6744
Жыл бұрын
Joe needs to puff some dmt, then Eric needs to talk fast, before the high ends. Then Joe will understand.
@LandoTech
5 жыл бұрын
Joe “but rock isn’t better than rock” Rogan
@HappyTwoBe
5 жыл бұрын
11:00 I love Jamie, "It's like MMA math."
@dreforeman1707
2 жыл бұрын
underrated comment
@mattjbg7025
5 жыл бұрын
I lack the tools as well
@bonniepoole1095
5 жыл бұрын
Love these guys! I've been trying to understand gauge theory from online sources but it was impossible until now. Eric says stuff as if we know his vocabulary, so, I take notes and then look up everything I don't understand. Then I understand about 5% more.
@natronfatumallafalla1922
4 ай бұрын
😅
@KyleJPie10
5 жыл бұрын
Listening to this guy talk just makes me realize I was never ready for this plane of existence.
@blazayblazay8888
4 жыл бұрын
Just did a spinner... Now I'm invisible
@GamingBlake2002
4 жыл бұрын
My brain melted when he said that rock beats rock because rock beats something that beats something that beats rock.
@moritzgro2442
2 жыл бұрын
That's because "beating something" is a transitive as it is a ordering-relation, just like < on the real numbers.
@MetalicAtheist
2 жыл бұрын
This video should be called "Eric Weinstein regurgitates information from an undergraduate textbook in particle physics without actually explaining anything."
@penzorphallos3199
4 жыл бұрын
15:00 here we go, we move from quantum physics to hand spinners
@jakep1979
5 жыл бұрын
My cat's breath smells like cat food!
@dadman9799
4 жыл бұрын
As an electrician I can confirm that with a “tic” tester we can confirm electrical currents through insulation.
@NerdKing9826
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Joe! This was awesome. You are really cutting boundaries with your podcast. I study math and physics, and this has increased my respect for you immensely. Thank you for bridging gaps in culture that were disconnected before.
@wilburshadens4164
5 жыл бұрын
-come home high -eat -go on KZitem -see this video -start to question if I’m to high or I’m learning this shit and it’s actually blowing my mind
@MeanBeanComedy
4 жыл бұрын
Ha! Jamie gets Joe. "It's like MMA math." "Oh, yeah!*
@GamingBlake2002
3 жыл бұрын
This was actually a pretty good explanation. The only thing I don't understand is whether defining a custom reference is a mathematical convenience or a necessity. What exactly _is_ the point in doing this?
@celidee
5 жыл бұрын
I literally just spilled my cup of water...thanks Eric
@MrLolifelos
5 жыл бұрын
This guy is great for insomnia
@abea2223
5 жыл бұрын
This whole conversation is dumb 😂
@hovikghazaryan9130
3 жыл бұрын
the hyper inflation wage example is probably the best example i’ve ever heard
@enhancingrice1825
5 жыл бұрын
Why wasn't there an Eric Weinstein in my life while I was in highschool?
@simens8646
5 жыл бұрын
Maybe the point could have been made even more clearly by pointing out that the peak of mount Chimborazo in Equador is the point on the earth furthest from the center of the planet.
@methaddict-dc7xh
Жыл бұрын
Being able to ask all these great minds any question you want whether the camera is running or not is truly one of the great jealousies of my life
@Gili0
2 жыл бұрын
These second derivatives are done on transcendental functions: sine,cosine, e^x; because they all yield the original function times a constant. Now this should make sense as to why the derivative is taken twice.
@tallahassZ
5 жыл бұрын
The Universe is Electric. JRE should get the TheThunderbolts folks on the show.
@littleAE86thatcould
5 жыл бұрын
electric in 4th dimension
@joshspeed7794
5 жыл бұрын
I concur.
@singularityhq
4 жыл бұрын
At 7:42 Joe looks like he's trying to choke the Physics into submission 😂
@dragonballZbigBang
5 жыл бұрын
Where's the full 3 hour video Joe?
@richieprynne4194
Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what hearing my dad explain filing my own tax report feels like
@OkayOkcomics
4 жыл бұрын
i'd like to plug myself into this video and fully understand it in 5 seconds like Neo hooked up and downloaded kung fu
@2552Zeus
5 жыл бұрын
Joe “does this make sense to you?” Jamie “yes” joe “it makes sense right” has no clue what’s going on he just doesn’t want to be the only one that’s lost 😂😂
@mikestirewalt5193
3 жыл бұрын
The highest mountain on the planet is Mt. McKinley in Alaska. Also called Denali. This is measured from the base of the mountain "0" to the top "20,310 ft" and does not take into consideration the base height of the land upon which it sits. This means Denali is actually a higher mountain, base to top, than Mt. Everest. Technically, Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain on the earth measured from base to peak, but most of it is underwater so that's a factor that needs to be considered with any "highest mountain base to peak" discussion. Unless the Pacific Ocean gets drained, Mauna Kea is tallest only in a technical sense.
@Mike-nf6nf
5 жыл бұрын
He's talking about spinors, not spinners (i.e. - Holly Hendrix.)
@thebidendotwin2926
4 жыл бұрын
If I keep listening to this stuff in the background will I eventually be smart?
@TehUltimateSnake
4 жыл бұрын
Asia and Caucasia i listen to this while I’m sleeping and now I’m a nuclear physicist.
@markortega7999
4 жыл бұрын
yes
@danellwein8679
3 жыл бұрын
that is what i am hoping for ... :)
@jaymorgan8017
2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like most of my education.
@tmjmccormack
5 жыл бұрын
Jamie and Joe should have swapped chairs for this segment
@albertescamilla
5 жыл бұрын
Jamie only knows basic Neutonian physics.
@petewiseman
5 жыл бұрын
The 720° arm-spin has a parallel in music. Rather than ascending through a scale note by note to reach the octave (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1), you ascend through alternate notes (1 3 5 7 9 11 13 1). This takes two octaves to reach the octave - as in 720°.
@petewiseman
5 жыл бұрын
... This gives a richer, more expansively musical result, although it is also already contained within the original 1-octave version.
@fromfleshtosteel
4 жыл бұрын
My issue with the coffee cup example is that it’s not the object’s fault you are uncomfortable when rotating it a full 360 degrees. You instead choose/need to rotate it twice only to make it possible for your arm’s ability of motion all while the cup has returned to its original position twice now.
@siinxx7656
4 жыл бұрын
It has been 2 months since you wrote down this comment, don't know if have figured that by now. But the point is not the constitution of the arm, but the fact that is possible to show case how a 720 degrees turn look like in the most simple way.
@sourdough7818
11 ай бұрын
Look at the object as the arm + cup with the shoulder as a reference point fixed in space
@marcusrosales3344
14 күн бұрын
I'd go to "guage pressure" as an explaination of guage theory. When you pump up a tire, it is measured in respect to the ambient pressure for convenience. You change the reference point depending on elevation! That is absolute pressure is meaningless but relative pressure (as in a pressure difference) is physical. We could measure in respect to vacuum, but then we'd have huge numbers. Also, a pumped tire (as in it is hard) at one elevation will require a different pressure for the same hardness at another elevation. This is why when you go down a mountain your relative pressure "decreases". The reference point is at a higher pressure, so that pressure difference is less. If we had a fixed reference, it'd always measure the same value. Again, our guage transform is a map which changes the reference point of pressure according to the ambient pressure. *Note: you can change the reference pressure, but the pressure difference will allways be the same.
@e99fuy0ng
5 жыл бұрын
Eric is so staggeringly intelligent, it's insane.
@sarahhockey2420
3 жыл бұрын
He is a genius
@Ruktiet
2 жыл бұрын
Undoubtedly he's very intelligent and eloquent, but he's also full of shit; he often does the following: he introduces very specific, difficult to grasp ideas that require a lot of introduction, motivation and prior knowledge of other subjects (often mathematics, or theoretical physics) to laymen who don't know anything about it, followed by a very poor explanation of it, and leaves them utterly confused, thinking that they are not nearly as intelligent as him, which probably is what he wanted to accomplish. He's often described as the opposite of Richard Feynman, and you can quickly notice why...
@vishwasshankar3929
Жыл бұрын
@@Ruktiet well put He makes it complicated than it already is Sure it proves that he is a genius but if he wants to communicate science to people like us he has to bog it down a bit
@epicenterbasshd9636
Жыл бұрын
@@Ruktiet nahh yall just not the smartest. Rewatch it like 5-6 times and you’ll get it, maybe more. But honestly I would rather have people explain it like Eric than people like Michio kaku who water it down too much and im left wondering what else is involved
@Ruktiet
Жыл бұрын
@@epicenterbasshd9636 ideas in physics are very often quite easy to grasp concepts. Putting them on a rigorous mathematical foundation is what makes it a bit more tricky. So if Michiu Kaku or Richard Feynman explain it so that essentially a toddler can understand it, you know these people understand the essence of it very well themselves.
@nemuritai
3 жыл бұрын
He should change the order to: 1.Physics is invariant to global phase Φ choice. Replacing Φ+1instead of Φ has no effect. Interestingly it is also invariant to local phase choice Φ(x), not just Φ. This requires an additional field, the vector potentisl A in the equations to make the equations be invariant locally. They have to be invariant as that is what is observed. With the extra field they are invarint. 2.The local nature of the invariance is not sufficient since different paths of transport may give different solutions, much like on Earth, different order of steps to the same spot will lead to you pointing in a different direction even if you arrive at the same spot. To get the invariance to path as well, an extra 'curvature' term is needed to offset this, which is the electromagnetic field, producing an Escher like invariance to path. Rock maybe seems better than rock at first glance but it all works out when you add the extra curvature term to make it work. 3.The local invariance can be described with 'fiber bundles' which is the math of local areas (little circles or squares on a sphere or mobius strip) which behave like normal areas even though the global area is more complex. The above shows how gauge theory consyrains the existence of fields, also things like masses and spin and antipartciles, many other things are constrained to exist or not exist just via requiring gauge invariance.
@basildog007
5 жыл бұрын
Echer's work is so trippy. Best art expo I've ever seen. Check him out on youtube, the guy was a pure genius.
@davesims7917
5 жыл бұрын
10:20 this analogy that he gave his absolutely horrible… I completely agree with Joe here which normally I don’t in these types of discussions but the guy didn’t awful job explaining why “rock is greater than rock”
@julianterris
5 жыл бұрын
I liked this epi. really cool to get some new insights into how the universe works -free! -Is some of this show missing?
@iridium1911
5 жыл бұрын
find the full podcast on joes channel... its like 4 hrs long
@YaBoiJeffe
4 жыл бұрын
So its the circular equivalent of a tesseract?
@peterc1019
5 жыл бұрын
The hopf animation shows two maps of earth: One normal, and one inverted. Does the inverted one correspond to the halfway-point of the glass rotation trick?
@suzannemartin8986
4 жыл бұрын
Do the things that require 720° rotation interfere/impact those that only require 360°?
@cristianespinal9917
4 жыл бұрын
I don't know how many times I've watched this segment, but I do know that I understand a couple of parts of it now... And others, Weinstein could have recited in ancient Mongolian and I would be just as lost as when I first heard it.
@zachfrancisco7041
Жыл бұрын
“We lack the time” never heard a better quote
@scapaflow2535
5 жыл бұрын
Tim and Eric did a stupendously good parody of this kind of segment on their skit about the universe.
@CroshVine
4 жыл бұрын
Joe, the "Rock is better than Rock" thing makes more sense if you look at it like this. Let's say you get knocked out by Fighter A, then a week later you knock out Fighter B. If Fighter B knocks out Fighter A, then you're technically better than yourself, because you beat the guy who beat the guy who beat you. Get it?
@eyeLie
3 күн бұрын
7:40 🤣🤣that cut to Joe’s face 😂😭
@justkiddin1980
4 жыл бұрын
After five minutes my brains starts making a weird farting noise, is this normal???
@MagXZaru
3 жыл бұрын
So i watched a few videos on Gauge symmetry and read some definitions and analogies and....I must missunderstand it because it seems so incredibly simple to me. As far as I understand Gauge symmetry is nothing more than the realization that the way the world works (charges and attributes of particles and the laws by which they interact) is not affected or changed by how any given intelligent being defines them for themselves. In other words: Just because I say an orange is blue and you say it's pink, does not change the fact that the orange is orange because the very nature of the orange is to be orange and the way we think about it does not change that. This just seems too simple, do I misunderstand something here?
@MagXZaru
3 жыл бұрын
Does this really just boil down to: Reality does not change by what I name it?
@Isaac_the_Seeker_of_Truth
2 жыл бұрын
That's the problem with how Lawrence Krauss and Sean Carroll describe gauge theory, it makes you think it's about how we chose to name things. It's related to that, but that's not physically what it is. The simplest example that makes it clear is the electron. The electron quantum field has a value at all points in space and acts as a wave medium. The phase of the wave is encoded by an angle on the unit circle in the complex plane ( exp(iθ) ). Harmonic waves are the simplest solutions you can imagine, but we know that in nature the electron quantum field isn't always harmonic, it has noise. So it's natural to assume that the physics should be invariant when we go changing the angle to add noise. If you compute the changes in the field (the time and space derivatives) to get a value for the instantaneous field action, you'll find that including arbitrary noise has an energy cost which can only be paid by a vector voltage, or more plainly, by a field identical to a photon quantum field. So basically, the derivative used to calculate the field action has to be altered in order to account for a "wave noise symmetry" by including a photon quantum field to set the level. Edit: I can't think of a simpler way to say this without losing accuracy, so I hope this sticks. If not, I recommend watching a few videos on complex numbers, complex waves, derivatives, Lagrangians and Lagragian densities, vector potentials, and the covariant derivative (which is really what this is about).
@captainchokdee1039
5 жыл бұрын
I love your brilliant mind Eric. Please keep doing these types of fascination podcasts.
@SladeMr123
4 жыл бұрын
You can't say derivative 13 times without explaining what that means before you loose everybody
@jackandrews7821
4 жыл бұрын
That's why we have the pause button and google.
@simonmathew6309
11 ай бұрын
Damn his explanation of the 720 degree rotation move with the coffee cup and Cmdr Frazer’s explanation of making a u turn in a fighter is very similar.
@itchykami
5 жыл бұрын
Poi spinning has a lot of 720 degree rotations. You weave the two strands together one one side of your body, but you have to weave them an equal number on the other side an equal amount to untangle yourself and return to normal. All to give the illusion of continuous spinning on a flat plane.
@orbifold4387
5 жыл бұрын
A mathematician explaining physics concepts is a PITA. Joe should invite a physicist to explain the same exact ideas so people can see the difference.
@venicebeachsportsnetwork6677
5 жыл бұрын
Tony Stark invented that first it's called Arc Reactor
@joelcurtis562
3 жыл бұрын
Gauge symmetry is not really all that mysterious. Here it is in a nutshell. Suppose you're at point A and I'm very close by at point B. Each of us has a ruler for measuring objects. Now, there is no guarantee that the units on your ruler will be the same as the units on my ruler. Nature doesn't come with built-in units. We can choose them arbitrarily, and in the most general case, your units will be different from mine. Say you choose feet and I choose inches. So your ruler uses feet and mine uses inches. Now, suppose we have an object that moves from point A (you and your ruler) to point B (me and my ruler). We want to know if the object's length changed as it moved from A to B. (In calculus terms, we want to differentiate the object.) Now, if you and I were using rulers that were both in the same units, this would be simple to answer. We could just compare our numbers. If my number is bigger, the object got longer, etc. But as I said, in the most general case, you and I will be using different units. In that case we cannot just naively compare the numbers. We must also account for the fact that our units are different. In other words, there are two reasons why we might find a change in the number that describes the length of the object: 1) The object's length actually did change and/or 2) the object's length didn't change but we shifted from using one length unit to another. For example, if the object is 1 foot long and its length doesn't change between A and B, you will assign it a length of 1 and I will assign it a length of 12. Does that mean it actually did change, that it got 12 times bigger? No. We're just using different units. And if we don't account for the fact that our units are 12 times smaller at B, then we will "measure" a change that is not real. It's not real because it doesn't reflect what happened to the object's length (which is independent of the units we're using), it only reflects the units (coordinate system) we use to describe it. In physics, we want to write down laws in a way that is independent of what units we use, so that relationships true in one set of units will be true in all sets of units. Only in this way will the laws reflect Nature itself, rather than our arbitrary ways of describing it. Therefore we build into the mathematics a 'correction factor' which is really just an elaborate version of a unit conversion. So when you change units in going from A to B, this built-in correction factor does this conversion for you automatically, so that you now have parity between your units so that when you compare numbers, the difference (which you need to do a derivative) reflects a genuine change in the object's length. In technical math terms, this 'correction factor' is called a 'connection'. In physics, the connection ends up representing what are called 'gauge fields', which in turn represent the forces of nature. So in brief: gauge symmetry is a way of finding out if an object has really changed (i.e. differentiating the object) by accounting for the fact that the reference system (units) used to describe the object may be different at different points (in spacetime), for different observers, etc.
@redjacc7581
4 жыл бұрын
carmel or does he mean caramel? regards the apple metaphor
“What does he do?!” - Tim Dillon on Eric Weinstein
@OnnoDijkman
2 жыл бұрын
Duudeeee I was just randomly watching this again for the nostalgia but wtf I even get what he's trying to say now! I UNDERSTAND THE DUDE ABOUT THE FIBER NOW!
@Woollzable
Жыл бұрын
Haha me too. What do you study?
@mattphillips2530
3 жыл бұрын
One mention of Lagrangians and the video bails. Just like me in college :3
@drewdavidson663
5 жыл бұрын
Anybody know the spinor animation link?
@evanrutherfordlazyahole9079
Жыл бұрын
Intelligent subtle way to ask for a raise.
@evanrutherfordlazyahole9079
Жыл бұрын
Better than beating up dumbasses.
@evanrutherfordlazyahole9079
Жыл бұрын
I trolled McNamara moron I deserve a raise he was busy looking tough lmao.
@chunky-d3204
5 жыл бұрын
I'm lost
@Hassan-bw5mr
5 жыл бұрын
ian davidson You just have to look into it that's all
@RR-hx7nj
5 жыл бұрын
I will explain it easier. Why would u ask ur boss for more money ? Hint. I flation.
@ReignForever
Жыл бұрын
This dude is my favorite person to watch on Joe's podcasts. Guy has knowledge on a whole other level than average humans. He has the ability to explain things in a way that most people can't do and won't bother trying to do, for normals like me! 😂
@natronfatumallafalla1922
4 ай бұрын
Ya he's different for sure
@devincognito8932
5 жыл бұрын
I just finished reading a book that covers differential equations for my math major, and I still need to watch this a few more times to understand. Sometimes I wonder how faster Joe's hamster is running with his guests lol.
@aftermath4096
Жыл бұрын
this is differential geometry, not differential equations, differential geometry is generally a more advanced topic
@XorDev
3 жыл бұрын
Me explaining math to my brother: 7:39
@SkottDennis
5 жыл бұрын
Why can't I find the whole episode?
@Adenzel
4 жыл бұрын
12:50 Pretty sure insulated wires most definitely still have a magnetic field or else electromagnets and everything that uses them would be useless or am I horribly mistaken?
@jackandrews7821
4 жыл бұрын
Wires in an electromagnet don't have insulation around the wires generating the magnetism. But there are also varying degrees of insulation too I guess.
@Adenzel
4 жыл бұрын
@@jackandrews7821 If there was no insulation the wires would just short out though. I've tried googling the effect of insulation on electromagnetic fields and come up with nothing that says the insulation blocks the magnetic field.
@lpz123
4 жыл бұрын
I’m here because Eric Weinstein made me realize I need to learn a ton
@travisfitzwater8093
Жыл бұрын
I've asked before but I don't recall ever hearing anyone talk about why squares and square roots appear so many times as integral to the working of equations in physics. Has anyone ever tried to figure that out. It seems, among many other phenomena, that answering the question of why certain things show up so often ought to lead to deeper understanding of the larger pictures in which they are imbedded
@Loonypapa
Жыл бұрын
Think of it this way: you're on the surface of the Earth, and you're emitting some radio frequency at a certain power output from an emitter the size of a kitchen table. Call this a unit sized emitter. As an observer moves away from that table on Earth, the power output hasn't changed, but the curved plane from where the observer can take a measurement shows the total power is reliant upon and related to the original unit area and power density. In fact that delta in power density between the two points correlates to the square of the distance between the original unit area, and the measurement-point area of equal total power over the new expanded area. Think of a balloon where you draw a square (the original unit area) on a barely inflated balloon, compared to how big the square is when the balloon is inflated under great pressure (the measurement point at great distance). The area difference is a function of a square of the distance. That is a physical measure (square of distance, i.e. geometry) governing the intensity of a field (i.e. field theory or physics). That is a simplified example of differential geometry at work in physics.
@traycer2
5 жыл бұрын
Where's the full pod cast!
@Testa717
8 ай бұрын
2.45 for imperial to metric for distance... 6.895 for imperial to metric for pressures, differential is inches of water to kpa or hydrostatic pressure vs gas pressure .249
@aaronarcee
5 жыл бұрын
Dan Winter has lectured on this for years
@clv9056
5 жыл бұрын
Joe "I didn't know Mount Everest was the highest point on Earth" Rogan
@cwallace
5 жыл бұрын
Highest point starting from where...in case you werent listening
@riyadhf1rdausehh
Жыл бұрын
what he is saying is that mathematically and confirmed experimentally, the nature loves unending cyclical shape, and it based everything on that shape. so gauge symmetry is essentially this weird connection to everything in the universe that is in that shape.
@jacobdieffenbach4835
5 жыл бұрын
The scientific definition of gauge symmetry seems to be the numerical measurement of a active formation of the flower of life. Does that make sense?
Пікірлер: 891