Joe: It's so hard for a dummy like me... John: Well, if you draw out a probability density function - lmao
@FusionC6
3 жыл бұрын
ahah i laughed at that too
@clawsoon
3 жыл бұрын
Funny thing is that he could've started his answer with, "Yes, you've basically got the idea. In more detail, it works like this..." I work with a guy like that, and occasionally when we're talking to management I'll jump in when he's half a sentence in and say, "The answer to your question, manager, is yes. Go ahead, colleague, continue your explanation, apologies for interrupting." If I don't, he gets to the end of his answer and management has no idea whether he just said "yes" or "no".
@MrDick410
2 жыл бұрын
He’s asks for simplification and this guy just gets more complicated 🤣
@KrazzeeKane
8 ай бұрын
@MrDick410 as a similar person myself who cannot ever keep it short and sweet, I sympathize with Carmack lol. It ain't easy being autizzy
@XZARKHAN
4 жыл бұрын
After you defeat all the frys electronics employees, you gotta face this final boss
@marcocano8399
4 жыл бұрын
I felt this
@internziko
4 жыл бұрын
I literally Lol'd at this comment.
@aGuyNamedEr1c
4 жыл бұрын
Calculus Prime
@Serjical1
3 жыл бұрын
Okay I defeated Fry's, now what
@jonathanirwin5549
2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@agrobots
4 жыл бұрын
The way he just explained quantum tunneling was so articulate that I felt real smart and real dumb all at once
@biggsydaboss3410
4 жыл бұрын
Then you had the appropriate response :)
@iakobkv271
Жыл бұрын
😂
@PcPFilmsDayton
4 жыл бұрын
I grew a pair of glasses, and a pocket protector trying to watch this.
@BASEDinMaine
4 жыл бұрын
Lmao. The way he says "Probabilistic" multiple times is enough to trigger the mutation for me.
@biggsydaboss3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@BASEDinMaine He's describing the wave function of quanta (quantum particles), which is a set of mathematical equations that desrcibe the chances of a particle to exist at any given location. The collapsing of the wave function, quantum decoherence. Is when the particle is actually a spicific point in space & according to some theories time. Yes particlrs, according to some theories, have non-zero chance of existimg anywherr & at any time. However some scientists argue that this would break causality & possibly the conservation of matter principle. I tend to agree with the sceptics regarding particles ability to be at any time. However I am less sure of the immutable natute of causality. Especially when we consider the part that virtual particles play in the physical universe. Virtual particles may disrupt causality, but play no part in the conservation of matter &/or energy, as they are merely borrwing energy to exist for a limited time.
@biggsydaboss3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@luk187 Because the analogies we use to describe such things are often extremely imprecise.
@FusionC6
3 жыл бұрын
@@luk187 The way to tell if someone really knows what they are talking about, is if they can dumb it down enough for someone who isn't knowledgeable on that subject to understand it.
@mandu9520
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Joe for just letting this guy talk.
@CarlosHernandez-rl2wg
4 жыл бұрын
Mandu This why I think Rogan is the best interviewer of the current time. He interviews people from different walks of life (Scientists, comedians, rappers, politicians) and effectively keeps up with them without focusing on one attitude like the usual latenight talkshow format.
@stevegoodson9022
4 жыл бұрын
It's a difficult thing to explain, an analogy might have helped, rather than trying to get into the quantum physics of tunnelling. I'd probaby use bowling lanes as an analogy, there's always a chance your ball will go into the gutter or even another lane, and if you reduce the width of the lane far enough that chance will become a near certainty.
@Hotou560
4 жыл бұрын
sooo much better
@haywoodjablomi1022
4 жыл бұрын
I agree with you but if you half to make it that easy to exlain then maybe they have no business even in this conversation
@gambitjl396
4 жыл бұрын
Definitely makes it easier for some to understand but I'd rather hear the scientific explanation myself as I love to read and take in all the information I can to further uderstand things. As Gabe said, if you have to explain it to the point of a child maybe some are just not fit for the conversation to begin with. Thats a whole other subject in itself.
@gamingtutor4575
4 жыл бұрын
So, how do quantum computers work? Do they harness the unpredictability and interpret that for computation? I find all this stuff fascinating.
@boahnation9932
4 жыл бұрын
Good analogy my dude
@atomicsmith
4 жыл бұрын
Oh I thought they were talking about Julianne Moore's Law: Each film she is in will be twice as hyped and half as good as her previous film. There is no known way to circumvent it.
@degreesocean1697
4 жыл бұрын
lol
@yonnsmith9243
4 жыл бұрын
Good one, very creative.
@majav15mg
18 күн бұрын
What’s the name of the movie where she shits and farts in front of a girl who later kills her?
@urazoktay7940
Жыл бұрын
He really is a genius and it shows. I love John Carmack so much, he is one of my teenage heroes.
@Flat_Earth_Addy
6 ай бұрын
lol no
@davidusa47
4 жыл бұрын
This dude was awesome. He’s the first guy I’ve heard explain the quantum mechanics problem coherently
@bangolio7
5 ай бұрын
John Carmack is indeed awesome, I can listen to him talk for hours because he just takes you on a journey every time he speaks and you come out smarter. Thanks to him we have Doom, Quake, Wolfenstein and Commander Keen; He was the main guy in charge of Oculus VR development in meta and much more. There should be statues of this guy all over the world if you ask me, for all the joy he has provided to so many people.
@granth.4299
4 жыл бұрын
Joe: “Jamie, look up ‘Atom as a billiards ball’”
@Jester2415
4 жыл бұрын
Just nod your head like you understand, Joe, just keep nodding.
@TexasGreed
4 жыл бұрын
I watched the whole podcast and there was a part where how just looks down at the table and says "oof" for no reason. I think he was just like fuck this is to much for my brain.
@gambitjl396
4 жыл бұрын
Obviously Joe's not a genius but he calls himself a dummy he's actually pretty intelligent as this isn't really that difficult to understand if you have a half a brain
@vazquezb2011
4 жыл бұрын
@@gambitjl396 He needs to relate to his audience, but Joe's plenty smart and getting himself educated in his podcast by some of the sharpest minds and best teachers in the world. Some of it is bound to sink in.
@XaeroR35
4 жыл бұрын
@@vazquezb2011 Yeah, Joe can speak on almost any topic that comes up now due to that massive amount of knowledge he has gained over the years.
@Juan_shot
4 жыл бұрын
"that's crazy"
@Tacos27182
4 жыл бұрын
The best video I’ve seen so far to help imagine how quantum mechanics works
@boggers
4 жыл бұрын
yeah, ask a scientist and he'll make some analogy that doesn't line up with reality and leaves the listener with confusing half truths... ask an engineer the same question and he'll tell you exactly how it works and how you work with it.
@DeliciousFood69420
4 жыл бұрын
Pbs Spacetime is amazing explaining quantum physics
@themanagement69
4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Most pros make it more confusing when they explain it.
@daalv8016
4 жыл бұрын
@@DeliciousFood69420 any links bro i love pbs
@DeliciousFood69420
4 жыл бұрын
@@daalv8016 the pbs spacetime channel here on KZitem has almost 2 weeks worth of nonstop binge watching on Top Notch Quantum mechanics and deep space...enjoy!
@Twobarpsi
4 жыл бұрын
Joe "I built my own computers to play DOOM" Rogan
@ATSinclair11
4 жыл бұрын
Got big enough to meet the dude who made Doom. It like being a guy who built up his Civic going meeting the head of Honda engineering.
@Twobarpsi
4 жыл бұрын
@@ATSinclair11 nice!
@SanDiegoOfficial
4 жыл бұрын
Mooooom the atoms jumping around again.
@BlastinRope
4 жыл бұрын
William Aristides electrons
@biggsydaboss3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@BlastinRope Atoms can do it & even there is a non-zero chance that you or I could end up at another point in space (by some theories, time). The numbers of years you'd have to wait to get to a probability of 1 is so large, it's unimaginable. The interestimg things about probabilities, that from our perspective over such a period of time the probability is 1, each moment it is as equally unlikely to happen. The odds don't incrementally reduce over each passing moment. Which leads us to the somewhat paradox that something with a probability of 1 (it will happen), may actually never happen. An good analogy. The odds of winnimg the UK's national lottery (that happens once a week) jackpot. Is 17.5 million to one. If you buy one lottery ticket per week for 17.5 million weeks, you have a probability of 1 in winning the jackpot. However each & every time you buy a ticket, you still have a 17.5 million to one chance to win. These odds don't alter assuming everything else remains the same.
@littlemanoo
4 жыл бұрын
Biggsy DaBoss So you’re telling me there’s a chance! 😄
@biggsydaboss3410
4 жыл бұрын
@@littlemanoo In all practicality, everything we can imagine has a non-zero chance of ocurring. So yes there is always a chance :)
@BlastinRope
4 жыл бұрын
Biggsy DaBoss now theres some science cultism that approaches religious levels of insanity.
@bayraktarx1386
3 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how Joe asks a question about quantum tunneling because he couldn't understand it with first time so dude explains it with even more difficult concepts 😂
@NunYurbis
4 жыл бұрын
When you start to refer to numbers of something as integers in real life situations you know it's time to take a break from the compiler lol
@NunYurbis
4 жыл бұрын
@Ivan Pe Nah, sorry, can't remember the time code, but the clip isn't very long and well-worth a listen, so you'll hear it.
@Xeotroid
4 жыл бұрын
The word integer isn't exclusive to programming, and it makes sense in this context when you're talking about tiny distances that can't (here at least) be divided any further.
@NunYurbis
4 жыл бұрын
@@Xeotroid I know the word isn't exclusive to programming, but it IS a very uncommon word as far as common usage is concerned, that is the point. In fact, this is the first time I have ever heard the word used in common conversation that was not about programming.
@PurushNahiMahaPurush
3 жыл бұрын
@Ivan Pe 0:35
@realmchat6665
4 жыл бұрын
So awesome, Carmack is amazing and he does a great job of breaking down complex concepts. Thanks for having him on, more of this please :)
@Zzutubez
4 жыл бұрын
Does Moore's law apply to DMT?
@sjolson68
4 жыл бұрын
Moore's law is really about pushing semiconductor technology smaller to drive wafer costs down and making more money, so no. :)
@DeusEx.Machina
4 жыл бұрын
@@sjolson68 did you even look into it ?
@MistyRedSpread
4 жыл бұрын
Every 2 years dmt gets harder to source and if you do find it, is probably clandestinely made in a kitchen. So no, no moores law with dmt.
@Asdfgfdmn
4 жыл бұрын
Moore's Law states that DMT amount will not be doubled every two years, so no
@Fummy007
4 жыл бұрын
DMT gets twice as potent every two years.
@milhousevanhouten3796
3 жыл бұрын
When people say America is in decline, it might be true, but we will put up a fight with genius like this.
@NickChapmanThe
4 жыл бұрын
It is crazy that John Carmack, a software genius, is explaining the end of the road for Moore's Law, a fabrication (hardware) limitation preventing packing more transistors on chips. Ask this guy about VR or Game Engine Development...even gaming in general. That said, I enjoyed his answer and learned some things and I'm pretty familiar with all this stuff.
@Heatwave9000
Жыл бұрын
Why can't we just make the chips bigger?
@mfrunyan
5 ай бұрын
@@Heatwave9000 the larger chips have a higher chance of not working properly after being manufactured, i.e yield goes down. It ends up being too costly to make economic sense and is the reason why AMD uses multiple small chiplets glued together. Also heat and power delivery becomes more of a problem
@scottgrdina5599
4 жыл бұрын
This guy is too smart for me. I'm a moron. Time for me to leave now.
@seabass4323
4 жыл бұрын
Dont leave. Learn. This is fascinating stuff
@patrciaclemons8183
4 жыл бұрын
If you sat and read the books he did, you'd be there too young buck.
@H4I2I2EE
4 жыл бұрын
He's a programmer/engineer. It has to do with math. Quantum mechanics has to do with math. Learn math then everything you don't know you can figure out.
@seditt5146
4 жыл бұрын
He is a Genius though, one that just happen to get his big break with his video games going viral in a time before viral is a thing. Unlike many however he was not a one hit wonder. Carmak made and worked on some of the biggest games of a generation and lead the forefront of advanced techniques for lighting(still does matter fact), mathematics and various other tricks to make things work in ways they shouldn't have at the time. One of the formulas he worked with for finding the Square root faster on a computer is not hardwired into the microcircuits CPUs of the computers which used bit shifting instead of floating point mathematics to find the sqrt(even though he didn't directly invent it he applied it in ways most did not and brought it to the forefront). The dude really is a smart man and he fits the part perfectly. He reminds me of the stereotypical computer nerd of the 90s and if there was ever something like a rockstar in the coding world... This guy is it without a doubt. Hell, he even partied with Rockstars Nine inch nails during the creation of Quake back in the 90s during the height of NIN success. Good man, I got nothing but good things to say about him.
@outsider1st
4 жыл бұрын
@@seditt5146 he did not code that neat sqrt trick. That was someone elses creation and it goes back decades in history.
@michaelpilkenton133
4 жыл бұрын
This guy is awsome great explanation. Would love to chat with him.
@dinkomalinko8585
4 жыл бұрын
I love hearing John Carmack speak, genius
@liggerstuxin1
4 жыл бұрын
I’ve always wanted someone to explain this to Joe.
@UnfluffedMarshmallow
4 жыл бұрын
the last 30 seconds was just a bombardment of words. i could barely keep up
@kuma1388
4 жыл бұрын
So he puts it into dummy terms and still no one understands😂🤣😂🤣
@tilidie5272
4 жыл бұрын
speak for yourself..
@radicai355
4 жыл бұрын
It's pretty simple
@krisjohnston5569
4 жыл бұрын
@@radicai355 "Quantum mechanics is simple" Tip your fedora elsewhere
@radicai355
4 жыл бұрын
@@krisjohnston5569 *tip* dumbass
@meatmissilef111
4 жыл бұрын
makes perfect sense if you've ever had advanced physics courses, particularly condensed matter, quantum mechanics, or semiconductors. So yeah basically nobody. sucks to be a normie, have fun with getting laid, us nerds have science to attend to
@zarodgaming1844
4 жыл бұрын
i love him XD always nice to listen to him, when he is exited about the matter
@FusionC6
3 жыл бұрын
Joe: I'm a dummy Carmark: so if you draw out a probability density function...
@spood87839
4 жыл бұрын
Carmack--Roggin in 2020!
@uniform1313
4 жыл бұрын
This clip blew my mind...
@percydevries
4 жыл бұрын
What an amazing podcast this was.
@myadv6083
4 жыл бұрын
This beautiful man is so smart, i wanna treat myself beacuse i understood a decent amount of what he said.
@nighthawk0490
4 жыл бұрын
I love this guy! Now I did take nuclear chemistry and nuclear physics in undergrad but OMG he explained it soo well and soo simply. "Wires only several atoms in diameter." Quantum tunneling tho... I wiki'd that and wow. Phd level there.
@djacob9800
4 жыл бұрын
My brain is toast.
@Fraustyy
4 жыл бұрын
I'm too dumb for this conversation so imma give this a thumbs up and head out. See ya on the next clip guys!
@jastv
4 жыл бұрын
Good to see an old school IT guru on the show. Take some notes Jamie.
@Bigbuggin
4 жыл бұрын
Jamie can't even scroll in the right direction
@PhyA52
4 жыл бұрын
Geezuss how significant this clip is...
@ldn0224
4 жыл бұрын
Talking about "wire" far smaller than a hair and with close proximity the electrons may jump to another sub-hair width that is right next to it.
@JSokil
4 жыл бұрын
When young Jamie pulls a picture from Albany Nanotech for the thumbnail.
@amantahiliani
4 жыл бұрын
I weirdly understood all that
@Trollseeder
4 жыл бұрын
the guy is unbelievable at breaking down super complex concepts
@quadlineboarder
4 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised John didn't mention the other big limiting factor which would help what he explained make more sense: the speed of light. Information travels on these wires at the speed of light, and since we can't make the speed of light faster, we just jam transistors closer together to shorten the travel distance of current. That leads to the explained problem where it's getting too condensed and quantum tunneling happens. At this point the chips also get insanely hot so you have a problem with keeping the chips from overheating
@businessbuilder92
4 жыл бұрын
Looking thru these trying to find which one then read circumventing Moore's law choice made
@geerstyresoil3136
4 жыл бұрын
when you blue screen or device unexpectedly reboots, usually its the non ecc memory faulting... Carmack actually did a pretty decent job in explaining it in layman's terms.
@chrisstevens8474
4 жыл бұрын
I would love to see Brian Cox and John in the same room together.
@s3m4jno5w4d
4 жыл бұрын
Oh, there's some shit right there
@JB-qt3wo
Жыл бұрын
Dude…this guy is like a genius.
@OGfps94
4 жыл бұрын
Mind = Blown
@gambitjl396
4 жыл бұрын
Just as hundreds of years ago many would never have been able to perceive the technolgy we now have, most likely there will be new technologies that will make this all obsolete making Moore's law irrelevant.
@unintentionaleffectiveness4393
4 жыл бұрын
Human ingenuity and the money that would come for the individual that cracks the puzzle and steer technology into a new direction will likely occur but that is the key word, right? “Likely”... it could be that we eventually get stuck. Hopefully that’s not the case though. If it was though, I would laugh in my grandchildren’s face as I was dying. “Yeah, that iPhone is basically the one I had in 2019, loser” 😂 can’t wait!
@KiiroSagi
4 жыл бұрын
It's possible, not "most likely".
@philmccracken9437
4 жыл бұрын
I concur
@jadejl3784
4 жыл бұрын
We could get stuck though the way human evolution and evolution of technology I see the human race ending first.
@angelicaa5106
4 жыл бұрын
As some predict technology merging with humans could be the next major part of evolution. Some think we will be half machine or the human mind will be living in a machine or merged with AI. If thats the case I never zee us getting stuck as technology would move on at a faster pace then ever. Though Moore's law could still be an effect as it has to end somewhere.
@madsbs123
4 жыл бұрын
Next large step down in scale is using quarks and gluons for computing.
@azriell783
3 жыл бұрын
Carmack is my hero
@asdfjoe12
3 ай бұрын
In fact, an advanced fab costs at least tens of billions of dollars. The cost John Carmack said was at least ten times different than the actual cost, but he has a good take on that...
@jebdulles5809
4 жыл бұрын
It takes a lot of processing power to run modern bloatware.
@steveclark9934
4 жыл бұрын
Cool moore's law.
@inspectorzenigata1
4 жыл бұрын
I was really expecting this to be about 3d transistor stacking. There are ways to increase transistor density other than constantly shrinking.
@sjolson68
4 жыл бұрын
Stacking, and basically all other methods to develop circuits sub 10nm, ends up with the same scale problem for the reasons Carmack discussed in that the interconnects end up as the limiter and not the device channels.
@inspectorzenigata1
4 жыл бұрын
@@sjolson68 which is why I talked about stacking rather than shrinking. You don't need to go sub 10nm to increase transistor density when you can just stack 2 or 3 levels of transistors. I'm sure there will be yield issues, but the quantum issues could be avoided by using larger interconnects. Clearly there's a need for it because TSMC announced a few months ago that 3d stacking is their plan moving forward and that they don't think that Moore's law is dead.
@sjolson68
4 жыл бұрын
@@inspectorzenigata1 Well, I was referring to what would be discrete device vertical stacking (ie. not feasible for many reasons) and by my understanding, TSMC is doing a wafer (really a die) stacking method for what will end up being effectively a MCP but with identical silicon vertically connected with TSV. I don't believe that really addresses the spirit of Moore's law but in in terms of practicality it's necessary because of all the device scaling issues previously discussed. All the major manufacturers are in the MCP space at this point but I believe this is the first time someone's publicly announced effectively going from horizontal core parallelism to vertical. It will be interesting to say the least. It's the same principle as building a hi-rise building vs a ranch style home - efficient use of a footprint. It's just a lot more challenging at the micron level for both yield and reliability. :)
@inspectorzenigata1
4 жыл бұрын
@@sjolson68 right, but I think you can understand how I thought a video titled, circumventing Moore's law might be about 3d stacking.
@hughJ
4 жыл бұрын
What about building a small portion of the chip where the spatial relationship of the wires corresponds to their logical relationship, such that the degree and quantity of tunneling errors you produce corresponds to the degree and quantity of logical error? Could you then have some arbitrarily small wires running at arbitrarily high clock speeds and utilize it for particular tasks where speed is more important than accuracy and determinism?
@McGyver777ATGMAIL
4 жыл бұрын
3D and high bandwidth between CPUs could be another way around. But the ultimate would be photonic processors
@kamranki
2 жыл бұрын
God of programming talking about quantum physics. Turned out to be quite interesting!
@DCComicsAndSomeOtherThings
4 жыл бұрын
This man has a smart voice
@coltencurlin45
4 жыл бұрын
Yup. What he said
@nightcrawler2099
4 жыл бұрын
Love the shirt
@s3m4jno5w4d
4 жыл бұрын
Someone needs to get this to someone in the Royal Institute, Carmack is a great educator
@s3m4jno5w4d
4 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see a discussion between John and Eric Weinstein
@k0myer01
Жыл бұрын
Where can I get a t-shirt like Joe's? With a relaxed neck like that... brand?
@christopherkwasnik6683
4 жыл бұрын
Damn this practical application of the nature of atoms existing as a cloud of probability in terms of location blows my mind! That’s like airplanes using Einstein’s relativity to adjust their clocks but with quantum reality & computers that’s fucking insane. Cool thing to see in my lifetime
@DumbledoreMcCracken
4 жыл бұрын
He explains it well
@Matthew.E.Kelly.
4 жыл бұрын
So few of us are able to contribute anything of value by commenting on this video that the two responses I was going to give are already here. & I keep up with quantum tech, mechanics, & physics.
@gambitjl396
4 жыл бұрын
What are those two things?
@Matthew.E.Kelly.
4 жыл бұрын
@@gambitjl396 Both were regarding the limitations of quantum computing at micro-scale & how it differs from nano-scale. Most of the last 50 years of computing being, you know, constantly making shit smaller!
@Matthew.E.Kelly.
4 жыл бұрын
@Jacob Monnin since someone else said exactly what I was going to, no. That would be the opposite of special.
@JPRytmo
4 жыл бұрын
I kept up and feel proud 😁
@jholid6y
4 жыл бұрын
Proof that reality is crazier than the Kardashian’s family.
@onestopshop5659
4 жыл бұрын
He Never Blinks 😨
@spmcginnis
4 жыл бұрын
Bori Glock He never sleeps, John Carmack. He says he’ll never die.
@onestopshop5659
4 жыл бұрын
S 😂😂😂
@nismofury
4 жыл бұрын
Joe is like mm hmm yes mm hum look smart look smart ...
@sartori69
4 жыл бұрын
Legend
@brittensomerville8883
4 жыл бұрын
I like how he said a "handful of atoms". You could probably fit atleast a few hundred quintillion atoms in your hand lol
@Cornwall1888
4 жыл бұрын
Noob Fury human hair is 300,000 atoms thick, those wires are thin
@brittensomerville8883
4 жыл бұрын
@Natty Fatty Powerlifting obviously
@limescaleonetwo3131
4 жыл бұрын
4:38 "oof"
@daveo7481
4 жыл бұрын
My dude just smoked 2 hits of meth, took a tab of the drug from limitless and topped it off with some DMT and went off about some real tiny Shrodingers cat business.
@Doom2pro
4 жыл бұрын
You can only sketch out a circuit on silicon so small, you can't make features smaller than the atoms themselves, it's like trying to make a playing card sized car out of jumbo lego blocks... The only way forward is to find smaller atoms that have semiconductor properties if you want smaller circuits.
@decentsizedballs
4 жыл бұрын
I’m gonna go give myself a swirly for listening to this
@hashpond420
4 жыл бұрын
We need that crystal shit from sg1
@littlemanoo
4 жыл бұрын
So you’re telling me there’s a chance !😄
@David-db1bz
4 жыл бұрын
HOLY SHIT JOHN CARMACK
@ismaelherrera8844
4 жыл бұрын
John Carmack should do Doom 5 Carmack edition
@piercer4882
4 жыл бұрын
Yep.. makes perfect sense...
@Zudexa
4 жыл бұрын
Goddamn I love john carmack
@markmark5269
4 жыл бұрын
I understood everything he said. That's it, I'm off to the Doctor's tomorrow, somethings just not right.
@seebe2084
4 жыл бұрын
I didn’t watch the whole podcast. Does Joe ever mention Quake?
@paradigmshift2223
2 жыл бұрын
love this guy lol
@philipthrasher
4 жыл бұрын
lol @ probability density function -- he used that phrase in an attempt to explain something more simply, hahaha
@utopia4056
4 жыл бұрын
So basically in that situation, the closest link just gets demolished?
@semperuna1609
2 жыл бұрын
Intresting
@michaelvendick2785
4 жыл бұрын
Why does this dude sound like he's about to break out into a fit of laughter at the end of each sentence?
@TexasGreed
4 жыл бұрын
Because he loves talking about nerdy shit to people. That's how's he's always been but he used to be very bad at it. He's held a lot of talks over the years and gotta way better at it. I think he's just goofy happy to have such a huge audience to unload his live for nerd shit on.
@vshazam
4 жыл бұрын
Indeed.
@annikapavlona1304
4 жыл бұрын
Huh. Interesting. I always had known you had a loss of electrons (due to discharge?) when you get to single digit nanometers semiconductors but did not know it was actually quantum tunneling. So somewhere there must be a optimum error/power curve in which we all, for example, decide to stay at 4 nanometer processes for the foreseeable future. Which can also be a boon seeing we can invest more time and attention into faster software and better batteries/heat management to improve overall results. Basically all we're doing now is throwing more power to improve computing instead of optimizing the computing we already have.
@spiritus.9
4 жыл бұрын
Smart af.
@wacksparrow88
4 жыл бұрын
Basically the bandwidth shrinks albeit satellites and microwave telescope expand the horizon path for space exploration. To improve simulation for conditional theories such as medicine, gps, and weather predictions, Moore’s law can contract. This contraction can happen with replacing binary Rubric cube method with letter replacement by adding a second order derivative for the use of natural and better application of transcendental numbers.
@wacksparrow88
4 жыл бұрын
Ppf function along Moore’s law which is a exponential decay function. Use natural log as the transcendental for completeness(circles, power functions). Double derivittive if applied Lorentz curvature which is isomorphic on an orthogonal space
@wacksparrow88
4 жыл бұрын
E =mc2...mass(electric flux) replace. Energy(statistic for probability function). C speed of light is where you apply modulus function such as time function. Time can therefore be a construct(learned in German ytber) there is where a derricate can be applied and use natural log for identities(learned on physicsforums.org)
@wacksparrow88
4 жыл бұрын
My base arithmetic sucks so let’s say 001 = A replace with new method. 003=b then let 002 go both ways. Assign function in a series and store results both ways for a and b
@toedyhood1353
4 жыл бұрын
“...a handful of atoms wide...” Wouldn’t a handful of atoms be approximately as wide as a hand?
@samfutch8994
4 жыл бұрын
That's moore or less correct.
@Waghdatiger
4 жыл бұрын
Just smile and nod boys. Smile and nod.
@RoadRallyLife
4 жыл бұрын
This man is inevitable.
@fuckshan
4 жыл бұрын
I want his shirt
@BengalsOAL
4 жыл бұрын
What if that's how the big bag actually happened? A quantum random teleportation but from another dimension. And when it arrived to this empty dimension it collapsed thus causing a mini super nova (the big bang) and starting everything we know today? Multiverse is extremely interesting...
@FuglyFatt
4 жыл бұрын
This guy could have easily ended up being one of the richest people on the planet if he decided to make something more boring besides video games. But, as a PC and tech nerd in general, I'm glad he did what he did. What he was discussing here is something I have always been interested in. The process of designing and making a CPU using photolithography is a fascinating subject. These devices are everywhere yet there is very little information about how the details of photolithography available to the public. There are a few old Intel videos about the basics and some other short youtube videos about how a chip is made from sand to the final product but the interesting part is the shrinking of the transistors and how they are able to take such tiny detailed pictures then basically develop/etch them onto a piece of metal.
@seanlee566
Жыл бұрын
Not only did he follow his passion, but it was so cool of him to not sell it out. Like he could have stopped coding, go more into the business side. Focus on moneymaking trash games. But no, he just wanted to make fun games for people.
@TheSubieFan
4 жыл бұрын
Just to let you know the chip manufacturer is tsmc he misspoke.
Пікірлер: 349