Watched this entire course and not knowing too much about poker. Entered my first tournament with over 100 people and came 2nd. Highly recommend. Literally watching this entire course again because bad habits have crept into my game.
@BarvGwydh
8 ай бұрын
This is not a good resource for learning poker
@kwamestar
8 ай бұрын
@@BarvGwydh what would you recommend? i am struggling a little with the concepts
@BarvGwydh
8 ай бұрын
@@kwamestar To be honest I am not sure what to recommend for beginners. But if you want something that's fairly entertaining and at least somewhat educational, raiseyouredge has good videos. GTOwizard has some good videos too, but they might not be good for beginners. You can also just ask online on places like twoplustwo and r/poker about specific questions you have about the game, best way to learn is by engaging with other people like that. And if you seriously want to get good there's beginner courses like BBZ's $50 From The Ground Up course (some of it is free iirc). There may be better alternatives.
@viniciusguedesdossantos2905
8 ай бұрын
why you say so? @@BarvGwydh
@sdnmkhn
6 күн бұрын
Hi H3 fans!
@internetshaquille
5 күн бұрын
yw 😛
@smarttrad1ng
5 күн бұрын
lol yup
@kamillaazim4862
5 күн бұрын
Family
@FlygonLJ
2 күн бұрын
Familyyyy
@3genac
4 жыл бұрын
Been playing 15 years and never caught on to the 5 or 10 straight rubric. Good teaching explicates the obvious. Thanks!
@PROPAROXITONO
2 жыл бұрын
me neither.
@Nikillem
3 ай бұрын
Such a simple tactic that I can’t wait to start using!
@septicwomb4394
Жыл бұрын
1:00:24 the A-high flush isn't the best possible hand; there are three straight flush possibilities because of the 345h board (A2h, 26h, 67h).
@domkaz1669
3 жыл бұрын
This is so cool! Thank you for these free lectures, I very much appreciate your work.
@yiningwang632
2 жыл бұрын
You cannot make a full house or better without a pair on the board --- You can, royal flush and straight flush
@calvinsaxon5822
3 ай бұрын
1:00:25: nope, best possible hand would be a straight flush since 345h are on the board (and someone could be holding 67h)
@boda.t
5 ай бұрын
At 01:00:20, the AKs doesn't have the nuts, only the nut flush assuming they don't know of course the other hands. 76 hearts would have a straight flush on the turn.
@dbless2005
4 жыл бұрын
This editing still slaps
@ottomanbob
3 жыл бұрын
Facts
@galadriel212
3 жыл бұрын
I agree
@hamed736
21 сағат бұрын
Cheers; how about the 1 unavailable video which is hidden? :D
@TupDigital
24 күн бұрын
Opening of every new section of this class is the prof saying, "SO...."
@TheTenerifeVibe
Ай бұрын
Holy fuck even from episode one this is a great insight
@jay98
2 жыл бұрын
The video is excellent! I noticed at 1:00:00 that the player with AKh doesn't have the best *possible* hand, which on the turn is 67h
@alvarobcf
2 жыл бұрын
I came to the comments to check if someone had this same thought haha
@numsig
2 жыл бұрын
There are a few mistakes in this lecture. This one where 76h already has a SF, but also his question about knowing when your fullhouse is best possible hand was wrong. QQ on board - having a Q and the highest side pair in your hand isn't a nut hand whatsoever. Another player could have a pair of the highest other pair in their hand...ie: QQ K97 player one has KQ, and his opponent has KK for a better full house.
@jay98
2 жыл бұрын
@@numsig this absolutely needs clearer explanation too, your full house can only be the nuts if your singly paired card is highest on the board *and* the paired cards on the board are the highest index on the board as well, a critical detail. AK is the nuts on a board with AAK, but not AKK as your opponent could have AA.
@PROPAROXITONO
2 жыл бұрын
@@alvarobcf me too! the best possible hand would be 6 and 7 of hearts.
@numsig
2 жыл бұрын
@@jay98 that's exactly the point I was making. In the example in the video he states a "nut" hand which isn't. The lecturer seems a little nervous and unsure throughout this course, but the content is generally good.
@DoktorL0ve
Жыл бұрын
i want to take this class so bad!!!!
@sayurnara7311
Жыл бұрын
Hi there, thanks for the upload. May I know where we could possibly download the slides?
@williammiller3052
4 ай бұрын
Category 3: I have amnesia and am therefore not sure
@Exercise4Freedom
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting this! I have one question, he talks about some facts, and I didn't understand why he said that I need a pair on the board to have a full hous eor better, becaus I can have a straight flush or royal flush without it, even though isn't likely to happen
@donpistacios
3 жыл бұрын
That's right, teacher "forgets" to consider SF and RF a lot. Like the "how can you be sure, that noone has better hand than your Fullhouse." With Q,Q,J,10,X (Q,J,10 suited) on the table, you could have QJ (or QQ for that matter) on your hand and still be far from nuts.. SFs are not likely to happen, but still possible..
@upplsuckimcool16
2 жыл бұрын
@@donpistacios the 3 suited cards were too far apart in his examples to show a straight flush. I thought the same thing but the slide he shown didn't work for a SF. One thing that bothered me as well is that he says "if you have a pair the probability of someone else having a pair is lower" which isn't true. When you have a pair the probability of someone else having a pair goes up. You've taken a pair out of the deck which takes away one of the cards that would be entered into the equation of having two different cards.... The probability doesn't go up that much, but it does go up..... more than 1% I think just thinking about it quickly.
@upplsuckimcool16
2 жыл бұрын
It's actually untrue that the probability of someone else having a pair if you have a pair goes down. The probability of someone else having a pair goes UP because your pair takes away one of the cards that might make someone elses hand not paired..... When you have a pair in your hand the likelyhood someone else does as well goes up..... not down. In fact, whenever I have a pair, I assume someone else does..... even though the probability doesn't go up THAT much it DOES go up.
@BarvGwydh
8 ай бұрын
I don't understand your reasoning, but this is wrong. The probability goes down. For the same reason that if you have an ace in your hand, the chance of someone else having pocket aces goes down. There are 3 combos instead of 6. If we dealt the cards face up to 2 opponents, and we saw that player 1 got an ace, we'd know that player 2 has a 1/450 chance to get dealt AA instead of 1/225. Same concept post-flop just less simple in terms of combos.
@upplsuckimcool16
8 ай бұрын
@@BarvGwydh The probability of someone else having a pair goes UP because your pair takes away 2 of the cards that might make someone elses hand not paired.....
@BarvGwydh
8 ай бұрын
@@upplsuckimcool16 No, there are less ways for them to have a pair. Let's say a board is 2 6 J. You have J8. This means there are only 2 other jacks, instead of 3 to worry about. So there are 2/3 as many combinations that make a pair of jacks as there would be if you did not have a jack yourself. Maybe if you give a specific example of what you mean then I can help you understand where you went wrong.
@upplsuckimcool16
8 ай бұрын
@@BarvGwydh we're talking about pocket pairs man. At least that's what I remember the video saying.... he was talking about pocket pairs... I was always talking about pocket pairs. When you have a pocket pair it makes it more likely someone else does by a non 0 %
@ChilledTV
23 күн бұрын
Say I have Ace of Clubs and Ace of Diamonds. There are 50 cards left. Every other pair has 6 ways of forming (not counting duplicates like CH and HC). The letters are suits which are representative of one numbers possible pairs. CD CH CS DH DS HS 6 pairs. So when left alone every card has 6 possible pairs. If I have a pair, the possible pairs left are (12 x 6) + (1 x 2) = 74. 12 x 6 is the untouched cards, 1 x 2 as there’s only 2 aces left. Whereas, if I have Ace of Clubs and King of Clubs there’s 3 possible matches for each: DH DS HS so (2 x 3) + (11 x 6) which is 72. This means there are more possible hands with pairs if you have a pair (74 > 72). This is accounting for one person pre flop, I’m not knowledgeable enough to calculate more.
@paulg6274
Жыл бұрын
I guess if youve literally never played poker before you will learn some stuff from this but it's pretty randomly organized and not how Id start teaching someone
@markpayton3895
5 ай бұрын
Best way to learn instead of this course?
@paulg6274
5 ай бұрын
@@markpayton3895 there are a dozen training sites that are much better
@markpayton3895
5 ай бұрын
@@paulg6274 Are there any specific ones you recommend?
@samb1169
16 күн бұрын
Other than for people who are literally learning the rules, this is absolutely terrible.
@BadBoy_604
2 жыл бұрын
Asking if anyone in that room if they have won more than $100k or $1M in a poker tournament seems like a pretty douche question.
@jsl2411
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah definitely
@upplsuckimcool16
2 жыл бұрын
that's why he didn't ask....... he stopped at 3k when noone raised their hand.
@sunny4883
2 жыл бұрын
sharks are not a type of fish
@micmac1719
2 жыл бұрын
Biologically they are; in poker no
@Tthumb
2 жыл бұрын
Don’t waste your time watching this
@worthplayingfor2197
Жыл бұрын
is it bad
@matias4747
Жыл бұрын
@@worthplayingfor2197 Is it??
@BarvGwydh
8 ай бұрын
yeah there is no point in watching this, you can sort of tell when he mentions his friend being a good player because he cashed in 2 tournaments, and then he shows some very outdated books that weren't even very good when they were released, now the game has advanced a ton and these books are pointless. learn poker from poker players
@markpayton3895
5 ай бұрын
@@BarvGwydh Any recommendation for better books that are more up to date or professional player to learn from?
@BarvGwydh
5 ай бұрын
@@markpayton3895 it depends what you want to learn. I'm not sure for cash games. for tournaments, Modern Poker Theory is pretty good, but getting a little outdated maybe. whenever I talk to accomplished pros, they usually say they never read a book. people mostly learn from independent study (hand reviews) and study groups / mentors
Пікірлер: 64