Enjoy these types of videos? Please give it a like Support this channel: www.patreon.com/eternalised KZitem Member Perks: kzitem.info/rock/qos1tl0RntucGGtPXNxkkAjoin Donate a Coffee: ko-fi.com/eternalised PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/eternalisedofficial Official Merch: eternalised.creator-spring.com
@Naruto_H
3 жыл бұрын
How do u read?? Tips??
@derrickdomino7287
Жыл бұрын
Mod
@vatoloco1751
Жыл бұрын
"Your not alone in your psyche" that's a tough pill to swallow and take responsibility for
@joeybeann
Жыл бұрын
You're
@milascave2
Жыл бұрын
Especially when it is completely undefined as to what he meant, unless he explained it after the camera stopped recording.
@rhmotes
10 ай бұрын
@@milascave2 He spent the minutes before that explaining exactly what he meant
@schiacciatrollo
6 ай бұрын
hm, i came just to put my own comment in our world of aboutism .. and the word responsibility struck me hard at first because it was this what i wanted to say .. 'i understand nietzsche saying that god is an excuse and that we! have to take responsibility' the statement 'god is dead' from a philological point of view and knowing that any word is sort of a prejudice is technically the best wave to flush away the big fat shell of 'god' like in mr. god this is anna anna says they make god smaller by, in my words, sitting on his face all day long ... very clever of buddhism of sitting on the own S and not on 'god's' face
@igzotiktv3600
4 жыл бұрын
I just found this channel, you guys make great content with depth and and simplicity. Keep making these videos
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks!! Appreciate your kind words. This is what keeps the channel going :)
@TheGilzam
2 жыл бұрын
Found one of your videos on Nietzsche, now I'm going to binge your videos from the beginning.
@enbilerfrainitiald8529
4 жыл бұрын
I respect Jordan Peterson a lot. However, I'm more on Nietzsche's side on this one. Peterson's religion is so nuanced that almost nobody holds his views, he doesn't even believe in a god insofar as there's evidence for one, but acts as if he exists. I understand that Judaeo-christian values have been developed for millennia with older religions enmeshed in them and so on. But, a religion is by essence dogmatic, it does not advance with science, it stays the same. The religious texts are not modified, that's the problem. Why not create a "religion" that is honest and does modify its texts, Peterson would say that it's metaphoric, has to be interpreted, has to be viewed as the era where slavery and so on was completely normal, but that doesn't take away it's responsibility to advance its views as we advance as human beings. At least, I'm not convinced yet.
@timteller1400
4 жыл бұрын
"he doesn't even believe in a god insofar as there's evidence for one" wrong.
@enbilerfrainitiald8529
4 жыл бұрын
@@timteller1400 You have evidence for a god? I'd love to hear it.
@timteller1400
4 жыл бұрын
@@enbilerfrainitiald8529 You missed the point.
@enbilerfrainitiald8529
4 жыл бұрын
@@timteller1400 I can't decipher what you're trying to say. It'd be better if you stated why it was wrong, I want to know as well.
@timteller1400
4 жыл бұрын
@@enbilerfrainitiald8529 "he doesn't even believe in a god insofar as there's evidence for one" Wrong. That's not what JP thinks about god. You made two replies. And both times you came across as a condescending prick, a know-it-all. I don't like narcissists. That's why our conversation ends right here. Good luck to you.
@namelessoverman
Жыл бұрын
A well-researched video that packs enough in a short time regarding the substantiality of Peterson's assertions on Nietzschean philosophy; well done!
@ministryoftruth8499
3 жыл бұрын
I agree with Jung and Peterson that it isn't reasonable from Nietzsche to expect every person to arrive at their own hierarchy of values, but for different reasons. 1. I think Nietzsche greatly misses the point of morality in his transvaluation. Morality is not like aesthetics. We need moral values primarily so that we can live with other members of our species with minimum conflict. Moral values are social values, hence these cannot be created individually, nor all the time. Moral values must necessarily be agreed upon, shared, negotiated, they're the result of a consensus, a societal contract; ideally passed in a non-intrusive manner through traditions/institutions and updated only when strictly necessary, cause moral values need a good measure of permanence/stability to work best. It just so happens that for a very long time the Church/Christianity held a monopoly over the traditions/institutions of the West, but it need not be so: morality is independent from religion, and secular traditions/institutions are perfectly capable of passing along moral values, so moral values need not be religious values. 2. Even if point 1 were not a thing, I do not think it would be reasonable to expect every single individual to have the capacity, time, and inclination to work out their own hierarchy of values. If every single individual differed so little in all these regards we could hardly call them individuals. They'd be more akin to the Borg. My 2 cents for what they're worth. Thank you for the excellent videos.
@TheExNonGrata
3 жыл бұрын
>Moral values are social values, hence these cannot be created individually, nor all the time. Moral values must necessarily be agreed upon, shared, negotiated, they're the result of a consensus, a societal contract; ideally passed in a non-intrusive manner through traditions/institutions and updated only when strictly necessary, Not entirely true, Yes moral values can be values used to guide us how to live among each other, but they are first primarily a guide to live in the first place. They most can be created individually because before societies, there was the individual. They are not the result of a consensus, that implies the people who constitute socieites all had a say. Morality, as nietzsche says are determined by the leaders of a soceity. > I do not think it would be reasonable to expect every single individual to have the capacity, time, and inclination to work out their own hierarchy of values. If every single individual differed so little in all these regards we could hardly call them individuals. Niether did Nietzsche
@MrHawkMan777
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheExNonGrata I don't think the history of culture should be seen as individual elites dictating society. Many times in history this has been the opposite. The reason why Christianity spread throughout Europe during the late Roman empire was because elites had grown decadent and incredibly rich with growing amounts of slaves and so the common Roman grew sick and tired of the pantheon based system which affirmed elites rule and so many would become Christian despite fierce persecution, such as being burnt alive by Nero. The masses would increasingly turn Christian in Rome after the emperor Constantine converted but he converted likely because he knew that the old religions were not liked by the masses and so Christianity was a way to reunify the Roman world and also he had a dream which basically made him an actual believer. But I think this shows that the best and most powerful cultural beliefs are ones that both elites and the masses come to believe and are often enacted through consensus of the people in all classes. if the Roman elites could have had it thier way they would have destroyed the idea of Christianity which states that every person has value under god's eyes which contrasted massively with the mass enslavement of the Roman empire and it's glory of conquest. There are many other examples such as French Revolution (which I'm personally critical of but still demonstrates this point) or Buddhism and it's reaction to the steep inequality and discrimination of the Hindu caste system. I do think culture is built by consensus and culture is how we think. Your culture and the way it helps you interact with others allows you to learn and enjoy the company of other humans. We are social animals it's how we became the dominant species and so we have to rebuild consensus in my opinion not disregard it.
@MidnightVentures
2 жыл бұрын
@@MrHawkMan777 😳
@dantegoat8568
2 жыл бұрын
very well said, secularism is necessary even to peterson for he makes the argument "not everything that is wrong should be illegal". but it's true that democracy, and our modern moral values came from christianity and on that sense i agree with peterson, which took a long time for me to do so considering i've stopped believing in a religion for decades.
@ThriftyCHNR
Жыл бұрын
@@dantegoat8568 The moral values from Christianity were ripped of from earlier religions and paganism. It is totally possible to construct a more efficient moral system without religion.
@carmenortiz5294
6 ай бұрын
Glad I ran into this site. I remember why I decided to get my Doctorate in Psychology. My plans are to watch every video, starting from the oldest to the newest. Been such a long time that I have to start from the oldest, regardless of what is covered. I am now almost 77, but I have time, plan to make it to 105 to beat my great granmother's record. Of couse I hope to watch them all before I get to 77, lol.
@timteller1400
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, if you live your life and work, eat, sleep, watch TV in between, you have a lot of time left to find the right ethics and morals for yourself that guide you through life.
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
An unfortunate reality, life breeds conformity.
@noambar3159
7 ай бұрын
That's existentialism pretty much; you are your own voice of truth which you base by experience.
@Davlavi
2 жыл бұрын
This channel deserves way more views. Keep up the great videos.
@thadtuiol1717
Жыл бұрын
The very fact that JP is considered to be "one of the most influential philosophers of our time" speaks volumes about how degraded and degenerate our time is.
@mr.buttram2837
Жыл бұрын
By pointing out things that most people should already know?
@ntodd4110
Жыл бұрын
@@mr.buttram2837 He says a lot of of things that sound "common-sensical" (therapists are trained in that sort of thing, after all), but when he takes on more complicated issues or controversies and injects his own prejudices into them - very pronounced and poorly-informed prejudices - that's when his power to sound "common-sensical" gets misused. His own ethics are not nearly as clear-cut nor as "traditional" as he would have us believe. That's when he becomes just another huckster trying to bilk the rubes.
@ARDG89
Жыл бұрын
most influential philosophers of our time? 😂 jp? according to who
@Ozscaro
11 ай бұрын
go clean your room kid, if you don't agree with him doesn't mean he's wrong
@yaboijacrispy70
11 ай бұрын
@ntodd4110 an example please lol? by "prejudice" i think you mean his religious/political beliefs, and calling that poorly informed or prejudiced is probably the most ironic statement I've ever heard💀😂 sorry thousands of years of knowledge that you've misinterpreted as "prejudice" are coming back to light through jp...not even saying he's a perfect man or the greatest philosopher, but degrading him to a con man simply for having his own beliefs...shows YOUR prejudice, my friend. no ill will tho have a good one buddy🙏
@psychmaestro8528
4 жыл бұрын
Amazing critique & analysis! Your tweet led me here!
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! Appreciate your kind words!
@dvoovra6975
3 жыл бұрын
*Note for the beginning: JP isn't a philosopher. Great video though.
@Eternalised
3 жыл бұрын
Yep. Thank you!
@ryokan9120
3 жыл бұрын
By the same token, you could also say that Nietzsche was not a philosopher. His academic field of study and expertise was actually philology.
@donotletthebeeswin
11 ай бұрын
I think this video essay fundamentally misunderstands what Nietzsche meant by "God is dead". It's not that God no longer governs our reality, that he's deposed. Instead, it's that he's been rendered unbelievable and his institutions lack the spirit that they once did.
@007lutherking
3 жыл бұрын
"We cant create our own values because we don't have that capacity" well that's something a man who hasn't found the treasure that is hard to attain would say, JP didn't find it, CJ didn't find it, Nietzsche came scary close to finding it, if only he had that thing, the thing which is the journey and the destination to enable him to pull himself out of the madness... We can infact realize our capacity to form our own morals, all it takes is a good old fashioned destiny's trial which you need to pass... Without it you guys are all lost and will cling to whatever philosophy that makes sense to you without fully knowledge if it was the right thing. One thing I will say though, dont be sheep, it is everyone's individual journey and so you alone are responsible for your actions.
@am-shak
2 жыл бұрын
yuuup
@Replied_ByMeatr1der5
Жыл бұрын
Only problem with that is that that value you've encountered must have had the accessibility enough for you to discover it, and more importantly *created* before you've come in contract with it so you can't say you've "created" it. Your journey would've allowed you to find the treasure that lies in the deepest depths but that was already created by God for you (symbolically speaking, I am no religious).
@brenda726
Жыл бұрын
Something from nothing. Even the beginning of the universe doesnt make sense if we take only a strictly human and scientific approach. The only thing that makes sense is that it did have a beginning from something, and that something can not be of this dimension, as that would immediately relegate it to nothing.
@007lutherking
Жыл бұрын
@@brenda726 yes the beginning is hard to explain so we can only speculate at this point.. the beginning as well as the end. The middle though for sure is the process of evolution which also has the property of exponential acceleration. Ie neo cortex is faster than limbic system is faster than basal ganglia.. whatever comes next after neo cortex in the evolution ladder will be quantum computer quick and will probably be able to make sense of and understand 4th dimension.
@room9podcast
Жыл бұрын
“If you see the bhudda in the road…kill him.”
@donotletthebeeswin
11 ай бұрын
Calling JBP a philosopher is like calling Elon Musk an engineer.
@jackpaumier6288
9 ай бұрын
Butthurt, bitter leftist I assume? Grow up for Christ sake.
@spasticalien
4 жыл бұрын
i see jordan peterson quote nietzsche often, this clears things! thanks for the video
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! Thanks for watching
@TheExNonGrata
3 жыл бұрын
be careful, peterson tends to appropriate Nietzsche
@dantegoat8568
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheExNonGrata "there is only my way, and your way, no right way" -nietzsche.
@TheExNonGrata
Жыл бұрын
@Prasanth Thomas It is yep, but the two aren't mutually exclusive. Ever since Nietzsche made way into the self help sphere, it has become diluted so much that even a Christian could take Nietzsche's words for his own cause.
@TheExNonGrata
Жыл бұрын
@@dantegoat8568 There are 1000 ways to interpret Nietzsche. They are all correct. Peterson has the 1001st take.
@laurabuhus5959
2 жыл бұрын
Great channel. Love it!
@soundeomix1854
4 жыл бұрын
Awesome, I really enjoy your channel. I share this video 👏
@shad0winfo
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent summary. Both have strong points.
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! Appreciate you watching.
@MrHawkMan777
2 жыл бұрын
Tbh I think this is one of the most important debates that almost no one is having
@Y0UT0PIA
Жыл бұрын
My issue with meta-modern trad-LARPism and the reason I basically agree with Nietzsche over Peterson is that, as far as I can figure, after the death of God, religion *can't* fulfill the function of 'providing a transcendental value structure' the way it did in pre-modern societies. Petersons notion that you should 'act like you believe in God' is essentially postmodern - he's not saying that you should believe it because it's true, but that you should adopt the value structure because it's good for you, *knowing* that that's what you're doing. That's all well and good, but if that's all your religion is to you, then it can't be your highest value - if it were, your highest value is 'believing what is good to believe'. At best, a religious tradition can be a stepping stone, a ladder one climbs to reach some higher place, not somewhere one can linger and still consider one's life and one's values ones own. The postmodern condition lies in the knowledge that God is dead and no 'rational', enlightened structure can fill the hole. For us, the abyss is an ever-visible everyday reality that we have to learn how to live with, and to try to mimic how our ancestors lived does not allow us to turn back the clock and become like them, it turns us into warped, disfigured parodies of our ancestors.
@noambar3159
7 ай бұрын
I mean for me, as a theist, God is my absolute Ideal of goodness and virtue, the metaphysical Father that punishes and rewards. That is what I would call my highest value; act to please God.
@blackshadow1596
2 жыл бұрын
The final video . I've watched everything now . You made me aware .
@wonka9917
2 жыл бұрын
5:48 so here come the islam with resoulution,islam is a focus in the life before the death “dounya” and the after-death “dar al akhera”,the islam is a functional religion is concerned about the functions religion performs for society and the individual.
@andrewwlt5330
4 жыл бұрын
Fascinating discussion & nice to know you👍
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for stopping by.
@andrewwlt5330
4 жыл бұрын
I love to learn Nietzsche & music (Chinese guzheng) You can see my channel
@PWizz91
3 жыл бұрын
So glad you worked on your narration, great video but I much prefer your new work
@mayranoguera838
Жыл бұрын
Icy of philosophers as uncles or aunt's or cousins and whatnot because y'all have different points of view and I think they help us in a sense where they give the tools so that we can make sense of what's going on inside our own belief system
@adarsh_3007
3 жыл бұрын
Nice video! 👍😊
@GaryKirkham-ju8gw
Жыл бұрын
Apollo and Dionysus - how much more grown up of a World would we have if people understood and embraced this concept ...
@liamhickey359
Жыл бұрын
Peterson is a philosopher? Pass me the puke bag.
@thespiritofhegel3487
Жыл бұрын
'This self-consciousness knows what the validity of the abstract person amounts to in reality and equally in pure thought. It knows that such validity is rather a complete loss; it is itself this conscious loss of itself and the alienation of its knowledge about itself. We see that this Unhappy Consciousness constitutes the counterpart and the completion of the comic consciousness that is perfectly happy within itself. Into the latter, all divine being returns, or it is the complete alienation of substance. The Unhappy Consciousness, on the other hand, is, conversely, the tragic fate of the certainty of self that aims to be absolute. It is the consciousness of the loss of all essential being in this certainty of itself, and of the loss even of this knowledge about itself-the loss of substance as well as of the Self, it is the grief which expresses itself in the hard saying that 'God is dead'.' - Hegel, 'Phenomenology of Spirit', 1807.
@citizenoftheyearCC
4 жыл бұрын
Interesting video I think we get our values from the society around us and that it changes as laws and social norms change.
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Certainly, good point! Thanks for the comment.
@keithtaylor55
4 жыл бұрын
That's called moral and cultural relativism...and while that is certainly true to an extent (that we are a product of our environment) ...when you take that notion to its ends...it means that there is no such thing as right and wrong or better and worst. It seeks to make sense of the world by suggesting everyone is a blank slate - that we are entirely malleable and subject to our environment. Its the foundation of the Leftist doctrine that has infiltrated our Universities for a generation...I suspect that is where you got this. I would strongly encourage you to watch many more of JP's lectures and try to undo that indoctrination...its precisely why we are seeing so much chaos in our society today. People have turned to this ideology and as JP warns...the consequence of nihilistic chaos (which is the inevitable end of this doctrine) creates a strong desire for order...the worst kind. History will soon repeat because God is dead and we were foolish enough to think we could replace him. Humans are not intellectually capable of an alternative to slave morality.
@IrishGal690
4 жыл бұрын
Why is the narrator talking like a vampire??
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
This made me laugh 😂 I'll try sound more human!
@cosmiccomedy7394
3 жыл бұрын
To make all the girls wet
@adarsh_3007
3 жыл бұрын
Where and how do you get your stock footage, mate?
@Eternalised
3 жыл бұрын
I use Pexels and Pixabay for free stock footage
@BastianUllr
Жыл бұрын
To begin with, Nietzsche does not understand the individual as an innate condition of the animal man. The animal man gains its self-consciousness to its full extent with the structures that can internalize through society. The will to power as a fundamental behaviour of life (which is just the result of energy as long as you are alive, that's all. It could be the manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics at the very core of all matter, and that's that.) is what explains these structures that allow power to be enacted, ever so more complexly, while at the same time generating "rules" or mechanisms that enhances its "freedom" or ways to act out power. It is the limits to power what provides more power, but not all limits. Overcoming is from ruling, ruling is setting limits. It is rules what allows you to play a game. Else, it would be just noise, else it would be just matter and not life. So, it is not that one can create out of the blue rules. Nietzsche knew clearly, as he analyzes in Genealogy of Moral and beyond good and evil, that we NEED culture to be man. Culture is part of what makes is closer to the "ubermensch". But, the culture that gave tools so the animal man can acknowledge the mechanistic nature of its animal self, is in itself the realization of the structures that "one" can use during "activity" when exerting power. We have the mechanistic view of Nietzsche, we have the manifest intention to overcome "metaphysics", and we also have his philologic procedure to read the past (something seems to me was inherited later by Hermeneutics), and we find that well, Nietzsche really could not claim that each "Ubermensch" would create its own moral value out of thin air, because we would need to manifest the exploration of these realization not to annihilate life, but to affirm it. One could say scientists are the ones revealing and creating the path of life for life to follow as they find what nourishes and enhances the possibilities of men to actualize power. The problem when doing that is that, well, you have no idea what might be the best way to affirm it, but for sure it was not telling life that it was a finished conquered game, but instead, that to rejoice looking what games now the animal man is capable of playing with the new code that has inherited. Reality would need to come forth as it comes, and we might face it tragically and upright. But you do not "create" your own values to replace the ones that made Christianity, the purpose is to show that values are a veil of intention. This is later explored by Wittgenstein. Now, I also do not think that Nietzsche considered that "all man would transcend." So, no equality for all. But for sure, those in power are also aware of their responsibility, their weaknesses, their appetites, ultimately, their animality as their own. That is more power than to be pray of it all. The inner battle is life, and everything is tension (hence the power everywhere). That runs along all German critic school of thought after Kant (Synthesis). I do not think Nietzsche was keen on equality at all, so no point of making "ubermensch" a formula, which accounts for the innate differences of that particular living creature. Yet, affirming life or ensuring life was a concern, in spite of the probable sacrifice this might mean. And this has been interpreted in far too many ways, as it poses the idea that the one capable of power has the responsibility of yielding power at its best. And that includes the ones who are not as powerful as long as they can be aware of their cultural bestowed agency and sincere reason behind it. Narcissistic folks would be like "I hear someone is calling me!" but really, are they powerful once we see their true colors? Yeah well... they just weaponize the fearful masses against life that is not them, that's all. No room for "honour" or grace when is due.
@brendangolledge8312
Жыл бұрын
I have found out how to generate/find values from within the self. I wrote a book on it and write youtube comments on it sometimes, but generally, people don't care. If you are interested, I can teach you how. And it's not feel-good spiritual mumbo-jumbo; I can describe in exact detail how it is done.
@Swati_1112
Жыл бұрын
Is love dead ? Not yet . ♥️
@finneganmcbride6224
4 жыл бұрын
Great video. Very well done.
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! Glad you enjoyed it.
@saimbhat6243
Жыл бұрын
Jordan peterson is not a philosopher, he is a clinical psychologist. He is rhetorician at best and a conservative ideologue at best. His arguments for religious dogmas are laughable. And not to mention his convenient use of survey correlation data to conjure up truths about human nature. Nietzshe would have despised everything jordan peterson argues for. Not only does jordan peterson take his personal beliefs as objective truths, moreover he starts crying every time and uses personal attacks in response to personal attacks. Jordan peterson takes post enlightenment humanist values as true christian values, which is completely ahistorical. It was after attacks from Renaissance intellectuals on church that gave way to modern western value. Most likely it was the examples from church of what should be eradicated from society which guided Renaissance intellectuals. Kant, Hume, Locke, nietzshe, marx, hagel, copernicus et al regarded christian morality as untenable and argued not for amending it, but replacing it. Although Christianity did have effect on their thinking, but it is definitely not the case that they had positive opinions about religion.
@saimbhat6243
Жыл бұрын
@@prasanththomas3130Well, if you think that "thou shall not kill" is a christian moral, then there is no doubt about your argument. But "thou shall not kill" and "love thy neighbour" etc stuff is just rational necessities for a functioning societies and you can find such moral in all kinds of pre-christian societies. But I can quote you hundreds of things from both old and new testament which condone, praise, enforce and justify things that even a layman of todays age will find offensive to common human decency. In contrast there are many pre-christian religions like jainism, manichiansim, bhuddism etc which categorily forbid any sort of violence and harm. When pope urban gave calls to invade "holy lands" and crusaders starting going buckwild right from the jewish communities in france to egypt or some literature of vatican when it had political power or some writing of martin luther on jews, those things are as christian as other things, you just cannot wish them away. Funny how you call these philosophers "traditional christian", but when they were writing, those writing were rejected by the church. Lol
@ntodd4110
Жыл бұрын
@Prasanth Thomas You're right about Nietzsche's anti-humanism. That's right where he and I part company. In my opinion, that anti-humanism inevitably pollutes rational politics and ushers in totalitarianism. Friedrich was not a Nazi, nor was he anti-Semitic, but his anti-humanism was definitely used for "human - all too human" purposes. He was lucky to have gone mad before he saw the full consequences of his own writings.
@MrHawkMan777
2 жыл бұрын
This is what I love the most about Peterson. It's his insights into the psychology behind belief systems and I always loved the way he talks about Nietzsche and Jung as great thinkers who offer explanations into the modern age before they occurred. I hate the fact the Peterson has entered the realm of "controversial" figures. This has all come from wokeness. What Peterson says in the video about how Nietzsche was a real critic in that he was criticising not to destroy but to construct, demonstrates how seriously wrong PC culture is. It has sought to destroy Peterson and almost succeeded, without actually trying to help build something or listen to his ideas. Peterson is actually trying to convey a message and has looked at all the arguments when his opposition rarely does this.
@corbindalis
2 жыл бұрын
Peterson is a great thinker? Hahahaha what are you smoking?
@MrHawkMan777
2 жыл бұрын
@@corbindalis I didn't say that, you've just put words in my mouth. I wouldn't call him a great thinker because I don't think he really has come up with anything new. He conveys good messages from other people in a concise way.
@Ecxoes
4 жыл бұрын
Another interesting video, its hard to disagree
@Eternalised
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment! Appreciate it
@dirkturtle3354
Жыл бұрын
What would Jordan Peterson say to the fact that Nietzsche's work as we have it today is largely the result of his sister.
@schiacciatrollo
6 ай бұрын
only problems make intelligence
@gertbruwer7072
11 ай бұрын
This is why Jung also disagreed
@alankuntz6494
2 жыл бұрын
You need to read , "All too human" Nietzsche was not a fan of any sort of conceptualized idea of God and most certainly not an abrahamic one. He definitely was not a Christian apologetic. I would call him an Apophatic contemplative in the truest sense of the word. He was a deconstructionist like Buddha and Nagarjuna and Jacques Derrida. was not a fan of any sort of conceptualized idea of God and most certainly not an abrahamic one. He definitely was not a Christian apologetic. I would call him an Apophatic contemplative in the truest sense of the word. He was a deconstructionist like Buddha and Nagarjuna and Jacques Derrida. Jordan is a christian fundamentalist apologetic and convolutes, distorts Nietzsche like he does with Derrida. He probably has never heard of Nagarjuna.
@Hirnlego999
Жыл бұрын
Completely silly, he never lived in the first place. Nor is the invention of him the solution.
@shipaskof8371
Жыл бұрын
A rose is so beautiful. Its geometry, its scent, its colour, but seen every day, it looses its initial magic, its joyful effect on the senses. So it is with everything. The trajic truth. We experience joy when relief from suffering comes or we make it come.
@BigShotBeans
9 ай бұрын
Some of you are so dense and dull. Just listen and try to attain something from what the man is saying.
@danielwalsh7618
5 ай бұрын
He is a clinical psychologist. He is not a philosopher nor to my knowledge has he ever clamed to be one.
@samlazar1053
6 ай бұрын
If God is Dead then so is the nation.Its laws and morals. And nasty tyrannical regimes will arise as result of it. Hitler and Stalin and Mussolini and Franco and all the others Tyrants showed u that
@joshuambuvi3209
Жыл бұрын
God is not dead,, our faith in God is instead dead
@realCharAznable
11 ай бұрын
That's the same thing lol
@Over-Boy42
10 ай бұрын
I believe Nietzsche did kind of view "God is dead" in a celebratory light. Because he saw God's replacement with the Ubermensch. Which it seems there is nothing he rejoiced more then the Ubermensch's coming.
@devinbradshaw9756
2 жыл бұрын
Just because we cannot create our own values does not mean God isn’t Dead, it means we are are simply a bridge
@kevinbeck8836
Жыл бұрын
We are the source of the values we have. Why is doing what we've already done before now impossible?
@skippy180864
10 ай бұрын
How can what was never 'alive' ever die ? how can what did not begin ever end ?...There is no 'god debate' because the other primary participant (god) will never appear: In other words no deity worth the name would ever need a 'human being' to argue for its existence.
@DJSTOEK
2 жыл бұрын
🖤
@laserus3333
Жыл бұрын
Fred was a Satanist
@ayushjha208
2 жыл бұрын
💋 muuahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
@Luvmeesh
11 ай бұрын
🩷🤍
@shipaskof8371
Жыл бұрын
Religion, for many has given false hopes of freedom happiness peace of mind if theyll just believe and trust and obey whatever they think their God s Will is. Some fall for the lie because their lives by their efforts, but also by chance, turn out ok and so they credit this to obedience to their God. Those who have also been obedient but whose lives turn out to be of immense suffering, wake up and realise there is no God. They have to find the strength within to console themselves, to endure, to rise above their meaningless sufferings. They dont have the comforting delusions of believers in a God.
@Usammityduzntafraidofanythin
2 жыл бұрын
Ubermensch sounds like another attempt at utopia
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
Nesmie mať žiadny stres nemôže fungovať ani biblia
@jeffreyflynn5746
Жыл бұрын
Ya you just lost a long time subscriber.
@sunflare8798
2 жыл бұрын
Peterson a philosopher? LOL
@CatnamedMittens
2 жыл бұрын
I mean, objectively he is.
@sunflare8798
2 жыл бұрын
@@CatnamedMittens does he have a degree in philosophy? Has he published anything in the field?
@CatnamedMittens
2 жыл бұрын
@@sunflare8798 Maps of Meaning
@sunflare8798
2 жыл бұрын
@@CatnamedMittens that's a book on psychology
@dantegoat8568
2 жыл бұрын
@@sunflare8798 nietzsche didn't have any academic expertise or a "degree" on philosophy either. he studied philology
@nietzsche1749
2 жыл бұрын
God is dead, God remains dead, because he is imaginary.
@ARDG89
Жыл бұрын
I never got this argument. how is god dead? god isn't human. gos is a human concept.
@JoePesciVSBillyBatts
2 жыл бұрын
Dieu est en réparation
@ricsouza5011
Жыл бұрын
nietzsgger
@tongleekwan1324
5 ай бұрын
John Peterson is just another clown using techniques like circular argument, pulling the wools over your eyes. confusing the opponents, etc
@TheShredfest89
2 жыл бұрын
He died singing Christian hymes.
@nathanmchiyengi7883
2 жыл бұрын
So
@lula4408
Жыл бұрын
@@nathanmchiyengi7883it's just an interesting fact
Пікірлер: 190