Самый запомнившийся момент когда танк напролом едет через лес,ломая вековые сосны как щепки.Конечно,немного жаль деревья...)Лайк.
@is8heavytank595
2 жыл бұрын
Tôi thích cảnh bắn súng máy và pháo chính
@rubenskiii
8 жыл бұрын
whenever i think of a "tank" this monster comes to mind: big,noisy and intimidating as hell.....
@nikkollaus
8 жыл бұрын
tank from l4d
@namespacestd131
3 жыл бұрын
then you obviously did not heard of object 260 aka IS-7
@doogustrog
3 жыл бұрын
Pfffff, IS-7
@Austrium1483
3 жыл бұрын
t-55
@hassanlabyad4082
3 жыл бұрын
@@namespacestd131 But did the IS7 enter mass production like is8 or is5 in the video
@PATRONSKiii
11 жыл бұрын
Wow ! great video about this tank. People often ignore its existence, and think the only tanks of ussr were T-55 at this time... It compared quite well with nato tanks even into the 1960's, and totally outnumbered nato heavy tanks M103 and concqueror... T-10M variant is interesting, with nice features, a very powerful gun, and a devastating KPVT for light armor and soft targets...
@JeanLucCaptain
Жыл бұрын
just watching it blow through that snow and those bog marshes is amazing.
@abc64pan
9 жыл бұрын
That's a beautiful looking monster.
@shykj8892
3 жыл бұрын
"Blyatful"
@Altair-hero
3 жыл бұрын
@@shykj8892 lol
@vadimisportil8097
8 жыл бұрын
Лучший танк своего времени!!! Сын ИС-3 с мега дороботками!!! с противоядерной защитой.
@jasonmoore1900
9 жыл бұрын
This tank is bad ass and one of my favorite tanks! I want one so bad! If I had one and could afford fuel for it, I would drive it to work everyday.
@petros311
2 жыл бұрын
you could not afford for parking tickets! lol
@is8heavytank595
2 жыл бұрын
Tôi cũng muốn
@vardans710
6 жыл бұрын
0:39 "That one ricochet" "We didn't even scratch them"
@bigmeme8464
5 жыл бұрын
War Thunder is better anyways
@cursedcliff7562
4 жыл бұрын
" *IT SEEMS WE MISSED* "
@Ninwildkat
7 жыл бұрын
Wow! The T-10M had 14.5mm coaxial heavy machine gun! And 14.5mm on the roof of turret! Northkorea actually puts 14.5s on the roofs of their tanks.
@danonmobile8437
5 жыл бұрын
1:20 is that how they get quick camo 😂😂
@tylnozcn27
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah probably
@falke_9775
3 жыл бұрын
You see ivan, when drive through forest, mother nature give camo
@s_3v
2 жыл бұрын
Yes just smash some tree
@nogisonoko5409
7 жыл бұрын
0:24 *Camera zoom in* Me:Dat ass XD
@user-ou4qc3gv6l
4 жыл бұрын
Т-10М самый красивый советский танк, внешне, да в прочем и всего мира
@is8heavytank595
2 жыл бұрын
Tôi không hiểu họ đã chế tạo những xe tăng có tháp pháo hình bán cầu đẹp như vậy tôi rất thích Xe tăng Liên Xô
@serhiib6730
6 жыл бұрын
дружить с русскими очень приятно, воевать с русскими не надо, никогда и не кому, всем добра
@ShengTheCraftsman
5 жыл бұрын
1:17 RIP gun
@cursedcliff7562
4 жыл бұрын
oof
@afzalch7969
4 жыл бұрын
Broken hahahahah
@SashaAvendale
4 жыл бұрын
1:26 here's was fores? Which forest you told?
@mb26
7 жыл бұрын
A sport tank for your family.
@user-fl1xo3bi1v
2 жыл бұрын
Отец участник операции Вихрь в Венгрии радист и их перебросили из Урала для наведения порядка в Венгрии 1956 и из воспоминания танки ИС Сталина очень хорошо помогали в боях в г Будапеште..
@gamerhistorian7843
9 жыл бұрын
WarThunder Patch 1.51 hype.......
@jhnwik469
6 жыл бұрын
Cutie Marxist it's trash now lol
@sincereeastman6972
6 жыл бұрын
Marco *rUsSiAn BiAs^
@PeenileCansir
5 жыл бұрын
Why did they leave it at 8.7.
@calvinrenfrow3072
3 жыл бұрын
I forgot it didn’t come straight with the Tech Tree when Ground Forces dropped.
@drrocketman7794
5 жыл бұрын
Specifications? Audio? Description? Great archival footage of this little-remembered Soviet tank.
@murf503
9 жыл бұрын
for its time nothing would have stopped it
@user-ou4qc3gv6l
4 жыл бұрын
Не ИС-10, а ИС-8, именно он стал Т-10
@ryouichisan
10 жыл бұрын
Ehm... it's not IS-10. T-10 and T-10M is correct, but the project originally named IS-8. Anyway.... sooooo cool video!!
@yolkhere
10 жыл бұрын
IS-8 was built only 10 tanks (tanks were tested in April-May 1950). For the IS-10 tank was altered engine transmission compartment.
@ryouichisan
10 жыл бұрын
Didn't know. Thanks! :)
@warkiller_v2999
7 жыл бұрын
The IS-10 (JS-10 in URSS) was rename T-10 after the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953. During his production he receive differents names, Is-8, Is-9, Is-10, OBJ 730 and after the final production he receive the name of T10. When they upgrade him he receive some others names like T-10A, T-10B and T-10M
@trolski1618
6 жыл бұрын
Math TvGaming there was also prototype called is5
@hassanlabyad4082
6 жыл бұрын
Takumi Fujiwara and is 6 too
@ShengTheCraftsman
5 жыл бұрын
if only the French's AMX 50 B had cool promo video like this, nope, they just let it rot in that museum
@swayamprava8251
3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: a better version of this tank was tested, the is-7, but was never entered into production because it was very expensive. The only prototype sits at display in Kubinka.
@topsecret1837
4 жыл бұрын
Something I was never able to understand about modern tank design was how the heck did no one consider the use of Heavy Tanks for Indirect Fire? With a low profile turret like this, I could imagine the elevation being increased to the point of having it being just as capable of launching missiles towards targets directly as it could fire shells in a ballistic trajectory (perhaps ramjet assisted) dozens of kilometers away.
@nickfilippos3340
4 жыл бұрын
Modern armies prefer to have vehicles specialized on each task. A heavy tank that is used as self-propelled artillery would not be as accurate and its armor would slow it down in tactical maneuvers instead of giving it an advantage in battle. Furthermore, these tanks were too expensive to be used just as artillery pieces. After all, soviet/Russian tank designs are not particularly famous about their elevation angles. I hope I have answered your question!
@topsecret1837
2 жыл бұрын
@@nickfilippos3340 ‘Modern armies prefer to have vehicles specialized in each task’ except they don’t. The whole point of the past half century was in making them as non specialized as possible to improve manufacturability, organization, overall mobility and weight. Heavy tanks in the form that was desired were simply too heavy to fulfill any of those purposes. What I was suggesting and I still suggest is a vehicle with a similar purpose to an SU-152, using a 6 inch gun or thereabouts with a shorter caliber that would have been able to elevate even with such a low profile turret. Depression would have been a limitation but if using guided missiles depression doesn’t really matter so long as the laser designator can point at the target. Also, modern armies are desperate for a tank that can specialize in urban combat instead of ad hoc solutions on MBTs that result in them being excessively heavy, even by WWII German standards. M1A2 Abrams with the SEP upgrades get to 68 tons, which is easily 20-30% heavier than the T-10.
@topsecret1837
2 жыл бұрын
@@nickfilippos3340 Also, a armored vehicle today with specialized heavy armor better arranged and designed to withstand IEDs and anti tank mines while holding a 150-155mm howitzer in a wide, low profile turret that can turn 360°, even if it were to reach the weight of the M1 Abrams would still have options in terms of just using a much more powerful engine. Diesel Turbines are extremely common, for instance.
@augustussohn893
8 жыл бұрын
You know, I've always wondered why they didn't just keep the design and outfit it with modern armor and suspension, etc. That tank really does look badass.
@robertgaudet7407
4 жыл бұрын
@@Gridlocked They're also faster and generally larger, have auto-stabilizing, have a completely different form of armor than hardened steel, computer-assisted fire control, ect ect. They aren't really 'heavy tanks'. They do weigh a lot.
@trashtrashisfree
Жыл бұрын
More modern tanks less weight better Firepower more maneuverable. Fuel for a 35-ton tank versus a 50-ton tank. Run out of fuel you're a Sitting Duck.
@nickfilippos3340
4 жыл бұрын
This video always gives me the goosebumps.
@shawnshawn7756
10 жыл бұрын
Wow..................the Russians sure made some amazing tanks during world war 2! Goes to show their bravery and courage , they never gave up .
@xaviercharlton8158
10 жыл бұрын
This is a post war tank. It was made to fight against NATO tanks like the M 60 and Centurion
@PATRONSKiii
9 жыл бұрын
Lol... Imagine this tank in barbarossa, instead of KV-1... I think germans would have surrendered on spot.
@nogisonoko5409
7 жыл бұрын
What would happen if Russian use T-90MS Tagil in the battle of Phokhrovkha?
@drrocketman7794
5 жыл бұрын
Um...IS-8/T-10 was Cold War, 1952...
@zed9095
5 жыл бұрын
@@nogisonoko5409 that's an export variant
@t10god
8 ай бұрын
I just think late 40s-50s Soviet heavy tanks are neat.
@killerdragon2011
3 жыл бұрын
Ngl I feel like give this thing composite armor era and a Multi Fuel engine and I bet it can still compete with modern tanks
@JeanLucsIronWarhorses
17 күн бұрын
this video is a classic bit of badassery.
@redle0pard
9 жыл бұрын
Now this is what a Real Tank should look & perform like! Great Video; Thanks for posting it.
@GEXGE11
10 жыл бұрын
The music is called? great video
@yolkhere
10 жыл бұрын
artist / song: Jim Davies - Empire (Electronic Guitar 2012)
@GEXGE11
10 жыл бұрын
yolkhere Thanks here's a cookie for you >^.^>#
@yolkhere
10 жыл бұрын
GEXGE11 thanks of course, but I do not Hammy Х)
@joash480
6 жыл бұрын
Darud-sandstorm
@i5ionut
3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful work.
@dendevis4331
3 жыл бұрын
1:53 после преодоления заснеженного бугра у водителя фактически перекрыт обзор.
@antonio13688
7 жыл бұрын
IS-8
@MattiaSetteSeven
9 жыл бұрын
i love t-10m best soviet tank
@theophanesantoniou8539
Жыл бұрын
my personal opinion is that the latest ww2 versions of this ссср monster were superior over the tiger tank. it s a good tank even against the abrams. it had a tremendous amount of firepower beyond its gigantic cannon. i think it carried at least 4 machine guns
@holokyttaja5476
Жыл бұрын
Good tank even against the Abrams? You have to be joking, the Abrams would put a dart through it's front armor from 3 miles away while the Soviet giant wouldn't have had time to react
@spamuraigranatabru1149
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine this with T-54/55/62AM upgrades.
@domenicogrimaldi591
3 жыл бұрын
I was doing a bunch of reading on old tank obstacles (particularily the Czech Hedgehogs) and was directed to this video...Impressive.
@dendevis4331
3 жыл бұрын
размеры кажутся внушительными, хотя масса почти как у современных средних танков.
@AndresLopez-wn8lt
6 жыл бұрын
Soviet cam from the 50's looks like its from the 20's
@victorkipray6042
4 жыл бұрын
Монстр холодной войны
@bualmr5634
3 жыл бұрын
For the mother land
@peterszabo3293
5 жыл бұрын
1:17 - től dönti a fát a gép.Mi a jó ebben?Hogy csak tüzifát dönthetnének az erdészek vele.
@deltaplus9k23
3 жыл бұрын
I see where Westwood Studios drew their inspiration for the Apocalypse tank in Red Alert 2.
@jenggoatee
9 жыл бұрын
song name?
@jpod73
4 жыл бұрын
Badass.
@gloriosaurss.4418
2 жыл бұрын
Exelentes tanque T10 y T10M gloriosas máquinas soviéticas.❤🇷🇺❤💪💪👏👏
@crysisidiol999
10 жыл бұрын
Cool looking , but sadly obsolete from the moment it left the factory . The days of the Heavy Tank where numbered from the moment MBTs like the Centurion and T-54 started coming out .
@Goreuncle
9 жыл бұрын
...Mate, if the IS-10 was obsolete when it left the factory, then the Centurion was a fossil. The IS-10 (later T-10) was so obsolete that the Americans used it as reference for their M103 heavy tank (which is a clear copy), and the British, who invented the tank but forgot how to build them during the 1930s, started trying to emulate Soviet tank designs with the introduction of the Conqueror. If your design is being copied, that means you are doing something right. You can't seriously say that the Centurion was more advanced than the IS-10. The Centurion was another British box (a nicer one, perhaps, but still a box), the British were still building boxes instead of streamlined tanks during WW2, British tank designers were still living in the 1930s in several aspects. Soviet tank design was already better than the American/British in late 1941, with the T-34. From that point on, Soviet tank design could only improve, and it did. The Soviets kept that lead until the 1970-80s. Sure, the Centurion was successful, that was because it was constantly upgraded, updated and modified to fill different roles, but Soviet tank designs were always better than British ones.
@destroyerarmor2846
2 жыл бұрын
@@Goreuncle HEAT FS made all tanks obsolete before composite armor. Then ATGM make them obsolete now
@abadai5443
7 жыл бұрын
The most advance tank back in 50s
@robbleeker4777
9 жыл бұрын
doesnt look like it had a stabilizer on it
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
9 жыл бұрын
The T-10Ms did. A More advanced one than used on the American M103.
@jules123589
5 ай бұрын
That button translation literally says ''sending'' lololo!!!
@bigverybadtom
4 жыл бұрын
An impressive tank which saw no real combat.
@mickvonbornemann3824
2 жыл бұрын
Actually did in the Middle East
@noorsheda1549
9 ай бұрын
@@mickvonbornemann3824wait really?
@davetaika7408
6 жыл бұрын
Soviet power supreme!
@user-rj8hd4wv1y
3 жыл бұрын
Очень жаль, что в Великую Отечественную небыло этих машин!..
@dendevis4331
3 жыл бұрын
ис-1 и ис-2 выпускались с 1943 года, хотя переломный момент уже пройден, согласен.
@Nikowalker007
2 жыл бұрын
Был КВ , родоначальник тяжелых танков , отличный танк для своего времени
@Burboss
4 жыл бұрын
IS-3 on steroids and Stalin's will. Deadly...
@Sbanar
9 жыл бұрын
Eats an E 100 for breakfast
@cunny8896
9 жыл бұрын
E 100 wasnt even created...
@Sbanar
9 жыл бұрын
The chassis was a little bit built.
@iMadCatzZ
9 жыл бұрын
Dumb shit... The T10m is 15+ years older than the e100
@nogisonoko5409
7 жыл бұрын
in WoT,E 100 eats you.
@nbayounguzi4083
7 жыл бұрын
no more like gets eaten by e 100
@zeezeiler
10 жыл бұрын
bro, i guess this is a is-8 not an is-10
@zrbbg9639
6 жыл бұрын
Joost den Braber You can call them both names.
@Wonni
10 жыл бұрын
ist an IS-8 but u can also say T-10.Its the same ;)
@markmccummins8049
5 жыл бұрын
Cool video. Better music would be Cher’s “Russian” song “Bang Bang.” Even had a musician plucking a balalaika!
@danielszabo9505
9 жыл бұрын
CHANGE THE NAME OF THE VIDEO !! T-10 was the real name of this tank but before transmission the Soviet engeneers had changed the name from T-10 to IS-8 (Joseph Stalin 8). So the T-10 and T-10M is the IS-8. Maybe there was NOT IS-10 but it's only MAYBE !! It is truth T-10/T-10M is the IS-8 and IS-8 is the T-10 !
@yolkhere
9 жыл бұрын
daniel szabo I repeating :) IS-8 was built only 10 tanks (tanks were tested in April-May 1950). For the IS-10 tank was altered engine transmission compartment. After the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953, the IS-10 tank has received the designation the T-10 (the modernized T-10M).
@danielszabo9505
9 жыл бұрын
Really?? then I'm sorry, I didn't know that but thanks the new information.
@piotrsergeievichrakovsky9087
7 жыл бұрын
Actually IS-8 and IS-9 were prototypes, the IS-8 was almost the perfect copy of a IS-5 ( objekt 730 in 1950 with the same catalisor than the IS-4) after they maded modifications and makes with it the IS-9. Than when they finally complete the project they maded the IS-10 but after Stalin's death they just put T-10... After the T-10m came. "M" for Modernisation... If we talked about smilaryties... In the family of IS there is IS-1successor of the KVs series and IS-2 ( the IS-1 with 122 mm barrel instead of 85mm )... After the IS-4 ( with the T-34/85 turret shape disign ) then the IS-6 inspired from the IS-4.... For the hemispherical turret shape there is the IS-3, the first tank with that design... After they made the IS-5, witch is very unknow tank. Than the IS-7 witch was more similare to the IS-3 but extremely more heavier ( IS-3 48 tons/ IS-7 68 tons ). Than they remake the IS-5 design into the IS-8/IS-9 and finally the IS-10/T-10 witch is the very last and the direct successor of the IS-3...
@zoltancsikos5604
7 жыл бұрын
Obstacles around 2:10 look like rubber...
@dodododes
8 жыл бұрын
what a agile tank here.... cromwell is not that agile in war thunder in realistic battles....
@Elijah.Goodwin
8 жыл бұрын
Well the Cromwell has really slender tracks
@RazorPL01
5 жыл бұрын
Not IS-10 but IS-8 aka T-10
@fratercontenduntocculta8161
3 жыл бұрын
dude this thing has a Dishka as a coax
@worldoftancraft
Жыл бұрын
KPVT. Kepevete.
6 жыл бұрын
It's not tank, it is demon
@frankfraser4583
9 жыл бұрын
Tamiya had a model of this but it is out of production. It was not a very good kit. Time to have a better version! Trumpeter. Tamiya, are you listening?
@smw1279
6 жыл бұрын
that thing was in service as late as 1993?
@pootnannies
4 жыл бұрын
isn't this the IS-8 and not IS-10?
@wixte
6 жыл бұрын
that was not a 27 second reload
@andregilet4192
3 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is a Nightmare on chains!
@ypoulopezouli
10 ай бұрын
Great video but the T-10 is the IS-8.
@Artemiy_777
7 жыл бұрын
Beautiful russian tank. and cool music!
@sreejyothsna3199
6 жыл бұрын
Russia should remodify and use these super heavy tanks now
@lucyle7906
3 жыл бұрын
About T-10: a heavy tank, but 0:28 how is can fast at heck
@ionutzcar8158
4 жыл бұрын
looks like is8..is this is8 or is10?
@sumrandumguy7177
4 жыл бұрын
T10 was derived from is8 Is3>is5>is8>is9>is10/t10
@zigzigler5111
5 жыл бұрын
Great video.. for some reason
@mr.laughington5740
3 жыл бұрын
The only heavy tank that can fire APDS out from its barrel.
@megaaids2653
9 ай бұрын
conqueror mk2
@Georgespicedaddy
8 жыл бұрын
the last few seconds where the t10m good video tho
this thing and other like it is why the NATO forces were panicking so hard and making absurd wnderwaffen like the UKs FV4001 that had little practical battlefield use. and the Americans had no real experiences in heavy tanks either so the M103 was doomed from the start.
@legionstrog
8 жыл бұрын
Знай наших.
@therealgsicht
4 жыл бұрын
2:47 What aircraft is that?
@metallist23
4 жыл бұрын
Looks like Soviet heavy helicopter Mi-26
@DarmoeD88
2 жыл бұрын
Сексуальный танк🙂
@charlesramos4294
5 жыл бұрын
The big, heavy, nasty JS Beast/T-10......!
@13thBear
5 жыл бұрын
Beastly creature. Sure played hell destroying trees and bushes! I wonder how well it would have managed actual combat in tank vs. tank environment. Does anyone know- did the Arabs have T-10s against the Israelis?
@Abed1984
5 жыл бұрын
No, They didn't have this beast.
@cyberswiper6317
7 жыл бұрын
IS-10 hmm sounds like a good tank clicks on video oh it's a T-10
@sixfootturkey5511
9 жыл бұрын
Stalin be proud
@kommieivan1259
7 жыл бұрын
8, IS-8 9 never existed and they never got passed 8 IS-1, 2, 3, 6 then 4, 5 and 7 where competitive of each other (designers where), then 8 but 7 was revealed later even if it was designed before IS-8/T-10(M)
@Russinh0
3 жыл бұрын
The Iosif Stalin Tank 10
@AlASokolov
3 жыл бұрын
IS-8. After Stalin's death tank was renamed.
@roastthetoast2345
7 жыл бұрын
the IS-10 never existed it wasn't even a prototype the last tank in the IS line was the IS-7
@sander6438
6 жыл бұрын
RoastTheToast is8 is also t10
@2706mauricio
5 жыл бұрын
Is like a beautiful nightmare.....that coming for you
Пікірлер: 337