KZitem, you're the best. Quick and knowledgeable than what anyone can imagine.
@anaxocgrahm
7 жыл бұрын
Wow! What my AP teacher couldn't explain in 3 hours, you did it in 11 minutes- THANK YOU! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
@oo1albm66
5 жыл бұрын
correction plz...that is vestibule which u called hymen... hymen is in the vagina... that ws vestibule not hymen ... which u mentioned
@Cramerica66
9 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this explanation. It helps a lot more than pictures in a text book for me.
@doriskamara4396
3 жыл бұрын
great explanation, thanks
@laurenhahn890
6 жыл бұрын
fantastic image, how you drew/conveyed the muscle of uterine wall. helpful!
@catundertail4160
3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic image, how you drew the musce=le of uterine wall. helpful lol
@lucy_Nduti
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining so well 😊😊
@jsnow07grad
2 жыл бұрын
I find these videos so helpful!
@kebbybeene3109
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks have benefited a lot
@livieart5640
5 жыл бұрын
Really helpful thank you so much
@khaliljaafar9510
4 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for this explanation :0
@goziegraal9598
4 жыл бұрын
i see you
@aladatan
7 жыл бұрын
very well explained and thanks for sharing.
@edwardtjola3247
7 жыл бұрын
very clear and well explained
@rhussellerivera8538
8 жыл бұрын
thank you so much :)
@hannahdaniel4422
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I learnt a lot
@flagotganura9707
Жыл бұрын
I like it
@rachelslater3295
4 жыл бұрын
Cool♥★
@moonie9024
3 жыл бұрын
when does the breast develop after your first period? PLEASE i need heLP
@aparajitasaha9624
3 жыл бұрын
Your q is wrong.
@marieschrag3918
2 жыл бұрын
it takes like years theres no set time
@CofaMakesVideos
7 ай бұрын
So dysphoric, I hate health class
@nickthebetamale2901
3 жыл бұрын
Pog
@TryingDinosaur
3 жыл бұрын
pogchamp
@nishapal736
Жыл бұрын
Pratical sir
@azizkash286
6 жыл бұрын
why are women soo hard to understand XD
@isaiah9501
6 жыл бұрын
Males have a complicated reproductive system
@catundertail4160
3 жыл бұрын
Nice video noob xd xd kkk lolbaconhairs lols
@elimiles4702
3 жыл бұрын
Not all females have slender waist and curving hips. This pink-outlined barbie doll is so not realistic. I am sincerely disgusted.
@anonymousartist2176
3 жыл бұрын
Nobody cares what you think
@elimiles4702
3 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousartist2176 Talking to yourself, eh?
@beanibopiboo
3 жыл бұрын
I get what you're saying and why you are offended, but I don't really take it in any certain way because that is not the point of the video.
@beanibopiboo
3 жыл бұрын
Btw, the woman barely has any curves, so I don't know what you're talking about.
@sashas3362
4 жыл бұрын
But since reptiles, fish, amphibians, and birds can change reproductive role one could argue there is no exclusively male or female reproductive role. I mean if a male changes so that it can produce ova then producing ova isn't a uniquely female trait. You can argue that the male turned into a female but that is arguable. I could argue that producing ova is something males can do too and isn't a uniquely female trait. So, there is no biological male or female.
@NP-ky2wy
2 жыл бұрын
Yes... if humans were reptiles. However, humans are mammals.
@sashas3362
2 жыл бұрын
@@NP-ky2wy You're missing my point. The general definitions for "male" and "female" apply to all animals.
@np6294
2 жыл бұрын
@@sashas3362 No, I get your point; your referring to gender assignments being arbitrary. I agree that all things are arbitrary and yet we put a name to things in order to refer to them. If we were not labeled as male or female, it would have been another label so that it we can be referred to. I here what are saying, it just is not concrete enough to be used in science. For example, If the reptile either, but the insect can only be one version each, how would you label it to refer to the abilities of that arachnid versus the other? What you are arguing is as accurate as, 'why does that stop of land need to be called a highway if it can sometimes also be a freeway.' I hope this analogy makes sense. I'm unsure if both versions of road are universal.
@sashas3362
2 жыл бұрын
@@np6294 I still don't believe you understand my point. I understand your inability to comprehend my logic though. This is a complex debate. You apparently, like most, prefer to think of the 2 different reproductive abilities as the traits which define 2 different sexes. That is certainly valid logic. But my argument is based on the fact that there are people who would NEVER accept that a (human) person born a male could become a female even if medical science had evolved to the point that a male could transform themselves so they had fully functional ovaries and uterus. In some peoples minds if a person is born male they will always be a male regardless of what they do to their body. So I am turning their logic against them and destroying the concept of the sexual dichotomy. You see? Perhaps it will help you to understand if you were made aware of the fact that there are people with swyer syndrome who are fertile and capable of giving birth. These people are claimed to actually be male. But if they can get pregnant and give birth then we must either accept that A) they are female or B) males can also produce ova, get pregnant, and give birth (or lay eggs in the case of some animals). If we choose to believe males can also get pregnant then we must end our belief that there are 2 different sexes. This may not seem like a logical choice though because obviously there are still 2 different reproductive roles. But biological sex isn't determined solely by reproductive ability or role in biology because scientists cannot agree on how exactly to define sex. Sex is determined by many traits. It may seem logical to you to define a male by the reproductive role of fertilisation and a female by the reproductive role of producing ova. But I am not certain that applies for all species. After all, how do we define "ova"? There are some creatires which would challenge any definition of ova you might suggest, especially when we begin to include plants and other creatures aside from animals. A "male gamete" does not need to have a tail like spermatozoa does to be a male gamete. Take pollen for example. Size also isn't a trait we can use to determine whether a gamete is male or female. There are animals wherein the female gamete is the same size as or smaller than a male gamete. With (most) fish both the male and female eject their gametes from their bodies. So how do we determine sex? Any definition we might settle upon might be challenged by some animal(s) out there (either already known to exist or yet to be discovered). So where do we go from here? Any definition of sex we might settle upon may ultimately be proven to be a stereotype which does not accurately apply to all. But perhaps a sterotype doesn't need to be accurate for all, does it? It only needs to be accurate for most, right? Hence the existence of typical males and females. Then there are the atypical males and females, right? But one could argue maybe only typical males and females should be regarded as males and females while the atypical males and females should be regarded as something other than male or female, a 3rd sex (or gender) perhaps. This is what some cultures have done. But some people would be offended by being regarded as something other than male or female simply because they do not comform to the sterotypes. So the issue of gender as a social construct complexifies the debate, you see? There is a push underway from authorities to redefine a woman as the feminine gender. But how does one define feminine? Certainly there is a way to define femininity in such avway that an Ai could determine a person's gender (the same as people do) but only if we rely upon stereotypes. This results in those who do not conform to the stereotype being excluded and offended, perhaps even oppressed due to enforcement of those sterotypes through social programming. There is still a lot of debate about all this. The fact that there is suppression of truth about human hermaphrodites (true hermaphrodites) doesn't help settle the debate. Add to that the fact that many true hermaphrodites prefer to identify as either male or female in an attempt to livevas normal a life as possible. They are ignoring reality imo. But many of those people tend to believe one's sex/gender is determined by whether they are masculine or feminine which then leads to debate over how to define masculine and feminine. These same people tend to accept a person can be a woman if they both conform to the stereotype of femininity and prefer female pronouns. They also tend to refuse to accept that someone who identifies as female (prefers female pronouns for some reason) is actually a girl/woman if they do not conform to their ideal of femininity. They rigidly enforce the gender stereotypes in an attempt to avoid the pitalls of logic one would otherwise encounter in the debate of how to define the genders. I find many doctors who are supposed to specialize in providing gender affirming care for transgender patients tend to refuse to accept atypical "non-binary" transgender or intersex/hermaphroditic patients, continuing to use male pronouns to address those deemed by them to be masculine, for example. I find that very strange. Anyway I could talk about this for hours so will just end thos by saying this is an unsettled debate and may remain an unsettled debate for a very long time if not forever. The best solution may be for people to segregate *themselves* into communities wherein they have all come to an agreement on how to define sex and gender instead of people with conflicting beliefs trying to live together.
@np6294
2 жыл бұрын
@@sashas3362 @Sasha S Again, I do understand your point. It is becoming clear, however, that you do not understand mine. Please look up the word arbitrary. Also, an exception is not the rule. I am not transphobic and people will always judge others, as you are insulting my intelligence simply because I brought reality into focus. At my previous college, they had attempted to have unisex bathrooms to accommodate trans students. There was a rise in sexual harassment among other things. I mention this to say, it not as easy as just saying everyone can be anything. Genetically, there are many differences between what we call man and women. Those gametes you mentioned, they produce hormones that create even more changes between the two genders. I am surprised you did not mention those who are born with both? There are many exceptions, but the general breakdown leads to 2 genders. If someone feels they are meant to be the other gender, that is their gender, not my own. I just know that doing away with gender is not as simple as you make it out to be and if you are not aware of that then learn about it, don't just read about and assume you are the expert and speaker for everyone.
Пікірлер: 58