In the fifties I had to leave home for awhile and live at my Grandmothers farm in central Iowa. Grandpa was advanced for the times by putting the water pump inside the kitchen sink so Grandma didn’t have to brave the mid-western winters. But we still used the classic outhouse that was a hundred feet too far in the winter and a hundred feet too close in the summer. I took baths in a galvanized tub in the back yard. I recall reading about of Dr. Livingston in Africa were he speaks of putting on a freshly boiled shirt. There was no mention of a Mangler but mom’s clothes washing washing still had a smaller version of the roller she called a Wringer. No spin dry back in the day. More recently I worked at an industrial printing plant that had huge rollers for the process. I know of at least one women employee that lost a leg in the thing. It wasn’t Victorian but the technology probably dated from the forties.
@johnrogan9420
2 жыл бұрын
Industrial safety. .still primative!
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
I had a godson who worked in both commercial and hospital laundries and he showed me the mangler at the hospital. I think that is what you described He said they were quite dangerous. I asked him if he had ever seen any accidents. He said no, but hed heard of a few. I'm clumsy so I would never want to get near one.
@davidpowell3347
Жыл бұрын
The "modern" electric Maytag washer that my grandmother had featured a wringer that ran the cloths through a pair of rollers that were spring loaded such that they squashed much of the water out of the clothes as the clothes were pulled through by the turning movement of the rollers there were no automatic timers on the machine but you could put water into the tub by turning on the hot or cold tap connection,pump water overboard into the adjacent sink by moving a lever on the washer control panel,and you could turn the washing agitator action on and off. Of course you could also engage or disengage the turning action of the rollers. I think it was positioned above the tub so that the water squeezed out of the clothes went down back into the tub. There are rumors that other versions of the washer were not electric but instead had a lawnmower type engine as part of the works.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting lecture. Being a modern h.sapiens sapiens-Neanderthal hybrid, I find them fascinating, as well as their sister-species, the Denisovans. Glad I found this, thank you for posting!
@JorgeTurenne
Жыл бұрын
Gran conferencia y estupendo profesor
@jesusexposed1848
2 жыл бұрын
that's how royals began by cousins getting married 2 start a dynasty
@fightfannerd2078
Жыл бұрын
Are you saying Royalty have more Neanderthal dna?
@gaylecheung3087
2 жыл бұрын
Different cultures connecting that’s what’s we’re still doing it now!
@George-pl7dw
3 жыл бұрын
Believe showing face shot of the attendees is unnecessary yet it reminds us of how little change there's been in humans for 40,000 years, still dangerous ugly creatures.
@seadog915
3 жыл бұрын
And most of them are old people! It kinda looks like Darwin himself was closely related to the Neanderthal!
@jchang76
3 жыл бұрын
Ugly inside, too, it appears, doesn't it?
@LeaMessenger
3 жыл бұрын
@@seadog915 hahahahaha even Darwin himself relayed to us that it was only a theory. Now that we have DNA we realize that we are not evolved from apes and gorillas etc.
@seadog915
3 жыл бұрын
@@LeaMessengerLOL It was a joke. It's ALL only a theory, but I think you should read a little more about what DNA proves or disproves.
@LeaMessenger
3 жыл бұрын
@@seadog915 Since we have never met and don’t know each other how can you know what I know or what I don’t know. Or what I’ve read and not read. It’s all good.
@8698gil
2 жыл бұрын
Why does he refer to modern homo sapiens as human? Aren't neanderthals human, too? Just a different human species? Shouldn't he say "sapiens" instead of humans? Otherwise, it was a great talk.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
I did not quite hear that. I heard him say that there are more human species sapiens sapiens. On the other hand, denisovans/the ghost species/Neanderthal having interbred with us means only one thing: same species.
@8698gil
2 жыл бұрын
@@annepoitrineau5650 Doesn't "homo" refer to human and "sapiens" to a subspecies of human? So Homo Neanderthalenses and homo sapiens are both subspecies of the genus homo. That's my understanding, anyway. Could be wrong.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
@@8698gil Yes, absolutely. Within Homo, Denisovan, neanderthals and Sapiens are humans. That's what I understand.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
@@annepoitrineau5650 I consider them humans. As you point out, both groups were genetically close enough to produce viable offspring.
@anthonyproffitt5341
2 жыл бұрын
@@annepoitrineau5650 there are other examples of two species breeding and having offspring that aren’t sterile. That said labels are labels, and labeling anything from thousands of years ago is imperfect. Bonobos and Chimpanzees are extremely close in genetics but have been isolated from each other for 2 million years and are recognized as separate species. They can produce viable offspring.
@anneshields2010
2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. video and come to think of it some of my cousins are jerks and I’d rather kiss a Neanderthal any day than talk to my cousins
@lindagusch2671
2 жыл бұрын
You can pick your friends but you can't pick your relatives!!
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
I have a few relatives like that LOL
@janehitt646
2 жыл бұрын
Why does he keep calling them animals? Are they yes, as much we are, and he is calling us humans.
@davidpowell3347
Жыл бұрын
The pathetically aged person whose skull is shown at about 22:00 ,someone obviously must have been helping him to survive for a considerable time before his death.
@markgarin6355
2 жыл бұрын
Audience seems older than the presenter.
@jestergodfield690
3 жыл бұрын
I wish dinos where still around! Not the meat-eaters, of course. I would totally ride a triceratops to work each day
@drunio1504
4 жыл бұрын
Oh good, Flame Wars in the comments. 7 million yrs of evolution has brought us to this.
@craftycriminalistwithms.z3053
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@davidpowell3347
Жыл бұрын
Is it still believed that certain Neanderthal bands made a practice of hunting and killing giant bears,which practice with the thrusting spears(with reloadable stone points/tips) that the Neanderthals had must have been quite difficult and dangerous Neanderthal would have had his large thrusting spear,used it to push a point into the bear,pulled his spear back and put another point from some sort of pouch into the business end of the spear and then attempted to place another point into the bear,meanwhile his brothers,cousins and maybe his father are all doing the same thing to overwhelm and bleed the bear to death
@johnrogan9420
2 жыл бұрын
Audience closeups...bet we will be considered distant ancestors in future anthropology studies.
@ilkeadrall710
3 жыл бұрын
Why is everbody so scared of cannibalism? We were cannibals. And some peoples are still cannibals.
@Fuzzmo147
3 жыл бұрын
Of your time & space👍👍
@ilkeadrall710
3 жыл бұрын
@@Fuzzmo147 I'm not really sure what you mean but I'll risk. Of our time and space. Current day: Papua New Guinea, Congo, Liberia, Some Polinesian Isles.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
There are 2 kinds of cannibalism (I am not interested in the difference between ritual or not ritual). 1- You kill the other in order to eat them. Awful as is any murder. 2-Someone dies, and as you live in penury, you can't afford to let any meat go to waste, so you eat them. If I knew I was dying, I might get some comfort knowing I will help keep my friends alive. It is not very different from organ donation.
@johnrogan9420
3 жыл бұрын
Baipol Lake Siberian horseman and his horse...N1a1a
@mrgeno4682
2 жыл бұрын
We had one at my job. This guy looked just like what they portray. Most people in the factory were afraid of him. I guess he had throwback gene's.
@RMCbreezy
2 жыл бұрын
Or he was a dick and you could not dehumanize him. Revel in the dark side padawan
@phorrheel5289
8 жыл бұрын
ohh.. i can't wait for the Neanderthal memoirs!
@martylawrence5532
2 жыл бұрын
Neanderthals, by actual DNA tabulation, were 99.84% identical to humans. Why the physical trait differences with such identicalness? Scientists say it was because of gene expression modifications for larger nasal passages and stoutness as a for instance. Bottom line? Neanderthals WERE human. Are fans of evolution taught by their mentors that gene expression differences imply DNA mutations? They do BUT the fact is they do not. Gene expression modulation is done chemically by already-existing biological system present in ALL life called the 'EPIGENOME' that is preloaded with its ability to pass adaptations for HUNDREDS of generations WITHOUT DNA mutations getting groomed by natural selection. This new elucidated ability was stated in 2014 by Dr. Skinner in a peer-reviewed paper. Evolutionists have hated the implications of this! Why? It fits the Intelligent Design signature while replacing the theorized Godless signature of on-the-fly evolution. The evolutionary theory is now missing its 'engine'. Evolution is not happening. It's a juggling act...a sleight of hand...all smoke and mirrors. Let me explained further...Intelligent Design proponents and evolutionists both agree that all aspects of gene expression and gene regulation mechanism are happening...both agree about the presence of the epigenome and its epigenetic capabilities, and about genome degeneration is a fact of life. Both sides can get a PhD in all of the above aspects and apply science and discovery without disadvantages to the ID proponents. The 'evolutionary theory' is ADDED by assertions, assumptions that their precepts are correct, as spin is added to these aspects. However, the presumptions of the precepts being correct were wrong. Epigenetic adaptations, without DNA mutations, was used as 'evidence' for evolving DNA mutations. This leaves mutations as being just mutations with no evolving progression coming from them. In fact, natural selection has selected epigenetic modifications, NOT mutations...thus giving it an intelligent design signature. This makes gene flow, sexual selection, and their frequency changes take on the ID signature too...not the evolution signature. Do mutations cause changes in the attributes of life? Yes but they are evolution-impertinent such as in 'speciation' due from loss of offspring capability. There is no evolutionary generation coming from degeneration. This leaves just one alternative. We are a creation, not a slow evolution. The Creator is Jesus Christ. Take His free gift of salvation purchased for you by His work on the cross and resurrection. You only have to believe and this free gift is yours starting right now, forever. The Darwin-pushers don't give a damn about you. Don't be their useful idiots anymore. Be a child of God with forever-life. The theory of evolution says it has an answer of how it gives needed adaptations to changed environments. It says it does in the case of the Darwin Finch. The finches came from the mainland onto the island with new diets pushed upon them. Their beaks had to change for the new diets. The theory says DNA adaptations that are beneficial gets naturally selected that gave the birds the new beaks all in a no-God spin of all-nature self-creation over a 2 million year period. So is it true? IF God existed, how would He do it? Not by accidental DNA mutations happening onto needed adaptations, would He? So again, if God existed, how would He do it? What the God signature of it look like? Well, the biological elements enabled for adaptations would exist BEFORE the finch's diet changed. Not evolution's AFTER the environment change. God's way would provide the means without mutating the all-important DNA sequences BUT...does this biological system exist? If it does not exist, then atheists would have strong evidence against the existence of God. If the biological system exist, it's a kill-shot against the evolutionary theory. So what is the answer? IT DOES EXIST! It is called the epigenome providing adaptations by epigenetics. It's a second code that runs over top of the DNA sequence codes like software. Genes are made of DNA letters but there are what acts as switches turning them on and off or...up and down like volume knobs. It's called the epigenome. New studies from the 2010's show these types of adaptations are done by this means called epigenetics, NOT by DNA mutations. It's a SMART AND INTELLIGENT way of adaptation pre-loaded in ALL life from bacteria, viruses, plants, insects, and all means of complex multicellular life. These adaptations for finches, for instance, only takes 17 years...not millions as the evolutionary theory has inserted. Epigenetics is another code that evolutionists would love to ignore and be kept swept under the rug. Even school biological textbooks of the 1990's pounded and preached evolution WITHOUT one word of epigenetics. I looked at one of their textbooks from 1997. Epigenetics has an intelligent design signature. It's God-created. His name is Jesus Christ. Get to know him! Epigenetics was not credited until the first time in 2014 for TRANSGENERATIONAL ADAPTATIONS AND TRAIT PASSING FOR HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS. Has evolutionists used epigenetic adaptations as 'evidence' for their DNA mutation/natural selection engine for evolution? You bet they have! They have presumptions of what came out to be wrong assumptions. Their assumed precepts were wrong that makes the evolution concept impossible. Does DNA mutations happen? Of course. Over 200,000 genetic diseases and conditions exist because of them. Do they cause change in species? Yes but it not evolution-pertinent. Genome degeneration is not evidence for evolutionary generation. It's an absurd idea. Don't fall for their smoke and mirrors. Evolution is NOT happening.
@Fuzzmo147
2 жыл бұрын
😂
@rehoboth_farm
2 жыл бұрын
Stronger bones and muscles, better teeth, larger brains, genetically compatible, tool use, art, burial of their dead... Obviously, we are much more evolved. A totally different species.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
Modern Europeans as well as Asians, are human-Neanderthal hybrids.
@johnrogan9420
3 жыл бұрын
In the year 9595 bc...no am pm convenience stores. .no cell phones ..
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
Also no more Neanderthal: they died out 24000 BC latest.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
@@annepoitrineau5650 Modern Europeans and Asians are Neanderthal-sapiens hybrids.
@caliedon1
3 жыл бұрын
Obadiah 1:3 “The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?”
@craftycriminalistwithms.z3053
2 жыл бұрын
what? Que??
@MISSIONCAT11
2 жыл бұрын
THANKS FOR THIS EXTREMELY INTERESTING LESSON ON HUMAN HISTORY. I think of the very highly educated and adventuresome academicians who go into rugged areas all over the earth to get this evidence of previous anthropoid existence. They are dedicated risk-takers as well and we are in their debt.
@kiwihans100
2 жыл бұрын
In the desperate attempt to prove 'we come from apes' a puzzle for those pointing to the N's is that their brain size was 400cc's larger than ours! Makes one think? ( Ours; 1200cc, N's 1600cc )
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
@@kiwihans100 We come from an ancestor we have in common with the other great apes.
@anthonyproffitt5341
2 жыл бұрын
@@kiwihans100 what?
@kiwihans100
2 жыл бұрын
@@anthonyproffitt5341 Hi! What are you querying?
@brandycoke713
3 жыл бұрын
Where the Neanderthals born
@Joakim1400
4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic lecture! Really learned a lot.
@davidpowell3347
Жыл бұрын
Concerning the question at 38:45 ,doesn't evidence of cannibalism frequently turn up in archaeology of "modern" humans? Remember the Donner Party incident? ! also accounts of cannibalism,at least of the dead,during the final days before the total defeat of the starving and surrounded German 6th Army at Stalingrad
@anneloving8405
Жыл бұрын
New Guineans are very partial to long pig.
@joannad5374
6 жыл бұрын
That Glenn Starkman, PhD is definitely one of them! take off the glasses and the suit, and give him a bearskin and hair and he could pass unnoticed in Flintstone Park.
@joedoggggs
6 жыл бұрын
yessss
@willhovell9019
2 жыл бұрын
Not a good introduction , as the welcomer mispronunciation of our cousins name
@christineludlam4170
2 жыл бұрын
I had always thougfht that neanderthals were humans,I didnt realise they were apes .thank you,
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
They are indeed apes, but then so are humans.
@ag358
2 жыл бұрын
We are apes also.
@vincentrolfe1384
2 жыл бұрын
When I got married I began to look and stand more like a Neander person. I have taken down all the mirrors in the house and it does not bother me as much. I quit doing window shopping in downtown Chicago too.
@lisarochwarg4707
2 жыл бұрын
Can you think symbolically? Maybe you're a mix.
@Fuzzmo147
2 жыл бұрын
DONT worry……… it’s called being married… bet the Mrs is never in… out shopping all day&back to her dressing room full of mirrors😜😂…
@vincentrolfe1384
2 жыл бұрын
@@Fuzzmo147 you won the bet Janet and the daughter is following close behind. We seem to be keeping all the Amazon del vehicles busy in Chicago just dropping 3-4 boxes at our front door a day + wkends. Then, yah, guess who uses all my HD packing tape and drives the returns to UPS USPS, etc. Chanel 5 is up to $100/oz now and plastic bottles. What is the world coming to!!
@Fuzzmo147
2 жыл бұрын
@@vincentrolfe1384 😆😆😆
@brunop11
3 жыл бұрын
Neandertal is proof that the out of Africa theory is wrong actually. It seems the more we learn, the less likely out of africa becomes (Rh- blood type). Denisovan is another one that is not found in people of sub Sahara African ancestry. More than likely we are all a combo of many different humanoids and each race is just a different mixture. Although we are all very close to the same nowadays. It would have been amazing to see all the different kinds of humans back then, when they really looked different. Image people who were all about 61/2 to 7 ft. tall coming in contact with the hobbits of Indonesia, who were less than 3 ft. tall.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
My guess, since I'm just an interested amateur is that race is a matter of various genetic mixtures, plus whatever adaptations were added.
@anthonyproffitt5341
2 жыл бұрын
The % of DNA from Denosivan and Neanderthal is significant but combined for some no more than 4-5% and for most no more than 2-3%. So 95%+ of all humans are from modern human migrations out of Africa, while the DNA from these other populations, that were interbred, can trace their ancestry to a population of some homo species at some point from Africa. So one way or another everyone began in Africa, with varying percentages of our DNA, migrating out at different times in history.
@35806willnala
2 жыл бұрын
@@anthonyproffitt5341 Exactly Well explained
@fightfannerd2078
Жыл бұрын
We come from Africa but modern humans do not come from Africa
@waynejackson1426
Жыл бұрын
@@fightfannerd2078 there are still modern humans from Africa. The summary of the story is, while some Neanderthals or Homosapiens decided to leave Africa, some remain but all species evolved hence Asian, Native Americans, Africans, Europeans and South Americans are all humans but with distinctive different features.
@charleskesling4477
2 жыл бұрын
Just wondering where do Adam & Eve come to play in the human history other than the bible
@TheTommyData
Жыл бұрын
I thought we learned that Neanderthals were not our ancestors, was that after this speech?
@williamrbuchanan4153
3 жыл бұрын
Kissing leads to,, you know!
@annharrison3905
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, so maybe they didn't die out after all.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
@@annharrison3905 Since all non-subSaharans carry Neanderthal DNA I believe that they have live on.
@marktwain622
2 жыл бұрын
So does a good foot massage.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
@@annharrison3905 Of course they did not: we carry them in us still. I have read somewhere that the total Neanderthal DNA (if you collated all the Neanderthal DNA left in Sapiens) is about 40%.
@bastiannicholls7692
3 жыл бұрын
This guy calls Neanderthals our ancestors several times in the speech, and at the same time he refers himself at them as animals. so were they just animals, or humans some how? taking into account all their human characteristics, I personally find inapropriate or disrespectful calling Neanderthals animals, it is exactly the same as when Europeans called Africans and Australian Aboriginals animals, just because they behaved and looked different.
@robertgreen9150
3 жыл бұрын
2 groups flora and fauna. Bastian, you figure it out.
@martylawrence5532
2 жыл бұрын
Neanderthals, by actual DNA tabulation, were 99.84% identical to humans. Why the physical trait differences with such identicalness? Scientists say it was because of gene expression modifications for larger nasal passages and stoutness as a for instance. Bottom line? Neanderthals WERE human. Are fans of evolution taught by their mentors that gene expression differences imply DNA mutations? They do BUT the fact is they do not. Gene expression modulation is done chemically by already-existing biological system present in ALL life called the 'EPIGENOME' that is preloaded with its ability to pass adaptations for HUNDREDS of generations WITHOUT DNA mutations getting groomed by natural selection. This new elucidated ability was stated in 2014 by Dr. Skinner in a peer-reviewed paper. Evolutionists have hated the implications of this! Why? It fits the Intelligent Design signature while replacing the theorized Godless signature of on-the-fly evolution. The evolutionary theory is now missing its 'engine'. Evolution is not happening. It's a juggling act...a sleight of hand...all smoke and mirrors. Let me explained further...Intelligent Design proponents and evolutionists both agree that all aspects of gene expression and gene regulation mechanism are happening...both agree about the presence of the epigenome and its epigenetic capabilities, and about genome degeneration is a fact of life. Both sides can get a PhD in all of the above aspects and apply science and discovery without disadvantages to the ID proponents. The 'evolutionary theory' is ADDED by assertions, assumptions that their precepts are correct, as spin is added to these aspects. However, the presumptions of the precepts being correct were wrong. Epigenetic adaptations, without DNA mutations, was used as 'evidence' for evolving DNA mutations. This leaves mutations as being just mutations with no evolving progression coming from them. In fact, natural selection has selected epigenetic modifications, NOT mutations...thus giving it an intelligent design signature. This makes gene flow, sexual selection, and their frequency changes take on the ID signature too...not the evolution signature. Do mutations cause changes in the attributes of life? Yes but they are evolution-impertinent such as in 'speciation' due from loss of offspring capability. There is no evolutionary generation coming from degeneration. This leaves just one alternative. We are a creation, not a slow evolution. The Creator is Jesus Christ. Take His free gift of salvation purchased for you by His work on the cross and resurrection. You only have to believe and this free gift is yours starting right now, forever. The Darwin-pushers don't give a damn about you. Don't be their useful idiots anymore. Be a child of God with forever-life. The theory of evolution says it has an answer of how it gives needed adaptations to changed environments. It says it does in the case of the Darwin Finch. The finches came from the mainland onto the island with new diets pushed upon them. Their beaks had to change for the new diets. The theory says DNA adaptations that are beneficial gets naturally selected that gave the birds the new beaks all in a no-God spin of all-nature self-creation over a 2 million year period. So is it true? IF God existed, how would He do it? Not by accidental DNA mutations happening onto needed adaptations, would He? So again, if God existed, how would He do it? What the God signature of it look like? Well, the biological elements enabled for adaptations would exist BEFORE the finch's diet changed. Not evolution's AFTER the environment change. God's way would provide the means without mutating the all-important DNA sequences BUT...does this biological system exist? If it does not exist, then atheists would have strong evidence against the existence of God. If the biological system exist, it's a kill-shot against the evolutionary theory. So what is the answer? IT DOES EXIST! It is called the epigenome providing adaptations by epigenetics. It's a second code that runs over top of the DNA sequence codes like software. Genes are made of DNA letters but there are what acts as switches turning them on and off or...up and down like volume knobs. It's called the epigenome. New studies from the 2010's show these types of adaptations are done by this means called epigenetics, NOT by DNA mutations. It's a SMART AND INTELLIGENT way of adaptation pre-loaded in ALL life from bacteria, viruses, plants, insects, and all means of complex multicellular life. These adaptations for finches, for instance, only takes 17 years...not millions as the evolutionary theory has inserted. Epigenetics is another code that evolutionists would love to ignore and be kept swept under the rug. Even school biological textbooks of the 1990's pounded and preached evolution WITHOUT one word of epigenetics. I looked at one of their textbooks from 1997. Epigenetics has an intelligent design signature. It's God-created. His name is Jesus Christ. Get to know him! Epigenetics was not credited until the first time in 2014 for TRANSGENERATIONAL ADAPTATIONS AND TRAIT PASSING FOR HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS. Has evolutionists used epigenetic adaptations as 'evidence' for their DNA mutation/natural selection engine for evolution? You bet they have! They have presumptions of what came out to be wrong assumptions. Their assumed precepts were wrong that makes the evolution concept impossible. Does DNA mutations happen? Of course. Over 200,000 genetic diseases and conditions exist because of them. Do they cause change in species? Yes but it not evolution-pertinent. Genome degeneration is not evidence for evolutionary generation. It's an absurd idea. Don't fall for their smoke and mirrors. Evolution is NOT happening.
@miguellopez3392
2 жыл бұрын
@@martylawrence5532 creation science is just agreeing what ever real science says and slapping god on top of it.
@scatdog1
2 жыл бұрын
We are all animals numb nuts.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
Human beings are animals. ALL human beings are animals. It is not disrespectful, it is factual. Disrespect comes in if we start to pretend some humans are and some are not, animals.
@sheilakirby5616
3 жыл бұрын
IT'S YOUR LIE *** TELL IT LIKE YOU WANT TO !!!
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
Another Christian intellectual who cannot deal with the fact that humans are great apes, along with chimps/bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. All a part of God's fascinating Creation, and all related.
@omygodchick
3 жыл бұрын
Ooooooooo 🤯😵💫 the Stone Age people are your grand grand parents
@markgarin6355
3 жыл бұрын
So did neanderthals evolve in Africa, then left, or left then evolved throughout eurasia...
@brunop11
3 жыл бұрын
They are proof that the out of Africa theory is wrong actually. It seems the more we learn, the less likely out of africa becomes. Denisovan is another that is not found in people of sub Sahara African ancestry. More than likely we are a combo of many different humanoids and each race is just a different mixture. Although we are all very close to the same nowadays. It would have been amazing to see all the different kinds of humans back then, when they really looked very different. Image people who were all about 6 to 7 ft tall coming in contact with the hobbits of Indonesia, who were less than 3 ft tall.
@markgarin6355
3 жыл бұрын
@@brunop11 I've always wondered if the contribution to modern humans was neanderthal for lighter skin color/hair, denisovan the oriental skin coloration/hair and facial features... eventually leading to north/south american inhabitants. With other offshoots effecting other minor variations. Subsahara africans also interbreeding with other local hominids kept their skin darker, as well as genetic need for protection from the intense sun.
@jacobjones5269
3 жыл бұрын
Well... The newest theory, I believe, is Neanderthal evolved from Homo-Erectus (Ergaster), long after they left Africa and lived in Asia... And over time Neanderthal made its way to Eurasia and finally Europe proper.. And much later Homo-sapians evolved from Homo-Erectus in Africa and moved out of Africa through the Levantine and onto Asia... And then Homo- Sapians moved out of Africa again, later still, and into Europe.. All great apes come from Africa, in some way..
@corterapidoetramontina2904
3 жыл бұрын
@@brunop11 yep. Thats the more accurate line of anthropology these days.
@annepoitrineau5650
2 жыл бұрын
One human species got out of Africa. It was a common ancestor between Sapiens and Neanderthal. This species, while in Eurasia, then branched out into Neanderthal and Denisovans. Sapiens evolved from this species much later than Neanderthal.
@garyk.nedrow8302
3 жыл бұрын
Neanderthals were not our "kissing counsins." Paleo-anthropologists even debate when Neanderthals split from our last common ancestor, but it was no earlier than 500,000 years ago and perhaps as far back as 800,000 years ago. The fossil record is extremely thin and any conclusions are highly conjectural. There are huge gaps in the fossil record, and the number of Neanderthal sites is very limited and geographically dispersed, masking the range of variation and rate of mutation within Neanderthals themselves. That makes paleoanthropology a fruitful discipline for creative speculation. At present, Academia suffers from an extreme liberal bias, and almost all videos on anthropology and paleo-anthropology are projected through the prism of political correctness. Academicians seem intent on making Neanderthals, Denisovans, and all hominids members of humanity - our biological cousins. It is a correlative of the general denial of differences and distinctions between modern races, an academic attempt to mandate "equality of outcome" in evolution. But it isn't so. Neanderthals and modern humans were very different. Even the similarities advanced in this video are suspect. Long before modern humans and Neanderthals existed, hominids were walking on two legs, using tools and fire, and trading for resources. Homo erectus, for one, was doing all of those things 2 million years ago, and homo erectus was not human. Neither was Neanderthal. I would argue further that until very recently the species homo sapiens was not truly "human" either. Modern humans that evolved in Asia and Europe do have 2% of their genes in common with Neanderthal. Exactly when that inter-breeding took place is speculative: some say as recently as 60,000 years ago in Asia, while others say 400,000 years ago. The later date is more likely for Europeans, during homo sapiens first unsuccessful migration out of Africa. But whatever the case, no academic argument can refute this fact: the human genome rejected all of the Neanderthal genes except for a few genes that offer resistance to or confer susceptibility to some diseases and the ability to adapt to high altitudes (found in Tibetans, for example). Note that a major genetic risk factor for the Covid-19 virus, found mostly in Asians, was inherited from archaic Neanderthals. But the nearer in time the inter-mixing is hypothesized, the stronger the genetic rejection must have been. We evolved separately for most of several hundred thousand years. Those facts hardly make a convincing argument for kinship. Moreover, our genomes were not compatible. Only Neanderthal males and human females could produce viable offspring. The reverse didn't work. There are no modern males with a Neanderthal Y chromosome. Which suggests the two species are more analogous to a male donkey and female horse producing a sterile mule than to the mating of Asian and African elephants. Finally, no academic argument can surmount the obvious: homo sapiens adapted to and survived the last glacial advance, while Neanderthal, for whatever reason, did not. In the scales of evolution and the survival of the fittest, Neanderthals were less fit. The argument that Neanderthals were our "kissing cousins" doesn't hold water.
@margaretlawrence3385
3 жыл бұрын
Keith Urban?
@johnrogan9420
3 жыл бұрын
Human....ape....human...like dog...wolf....dog
@sheilakirby5616
3 жыл бұрын
IF YOU PAY MORE ATTENTION TO HUMANITY AS WE KNOW IT *** WE CAN ALSO SEE THE NEANDERTHALS WALKING AMONG US !!! ONE POTENTIAL REALITY TO US BOTH IS THAT WE BOTH HAVE THE HAVE THE PERCEPTION AND OVERWHELMING DRIVE TO SURVIVE !!!
@lisarochwarg4707
2 жыл бұрын
So does my cat.
@greenflagracing7067
2 жыл бұрын
They look rather foreign.
@sheilakirby5616
3 жыл бұрын
WHILE ON THE OTHER HAND *** EVER SENCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME *** THERE WAS ALWAYS THE REALITY THAT SOMEONE ALWAYS WANTED WHAT THE OTHER HAS !!! THAT COULD LEAD TO RAIDING * WOMAN - NAPPING !!! WAR *
@PaulJersey
3 жыл бұрын
This is my best guess. They were older style people, but people nevertheless. Modern man came out of Africa 40,000 years ago and assimilated them, and also killed them off. I am thinking of modern man as a superior predator. Modern man was like a pride of lions and they killed off the Neanderthals like lions kill off leopards and hyenas. A top predator will kill off its competition for food every time. Modern man had spears, bow and arrows, throwing axes and domesticated wolves. Modern man had to survive in Africa with lions and were tough as nails. The poor Neanderthals were nice people who took care of their wounded, but they didn’t stand a chance against the invaders.
@corterapidoetramontina2904
3 жыл бұрын
You probably dont know, since you said that...but there was a LOT of Lions in Europe in the Paleolithic times. They were called Cave Lions. Also Hyenas, Tiggers, Bears, Wolves, Rhinos, Mammoths, Cougars...and guess what, they were all bigger than they relatives in Africa. The megafauna of out the african continent were all bigger than the remaining in africa by then and today. And there where the Neanderthals, living at the middle of those beasts and passing through 9-11 months of hard winter per year. This vision of yours about these hominids being poor and dumb are completely mistaken. And what are u sayin? they did had spears, axes and perhaps even bows and arrows dude. Also their brain are measured by archeologists and antropologists to be a few times bigger than the "african modern sapiens". Dispact the fact that they probably had a lot of mental disorders such as autism, no one would be surprised to find out that the IQ of them could be quite higher than ours... And let me remind u, when the Sapiens and Neanderthals first encountered, at the Levant, 55,000-45,000 years ago, the "modern man" did not even dreamed on domesticating wolves to turn them into dogs or what so ever...the domestication of wolves started way way later that the Neanderthals all had already dissapeared from the landscape.
@corterapidoetramontina2904
3 жыл бұрын
The reason that extinct the Neanderthais was probably hibridization with the outsiders that made them lose the genetic majority over the crescent population of new comers, (since the neanderthals were a few tiny group, and almost ever living isolated from each other groups, soon or later they would lose in number against the sapiens), disiases, and probably natural disasters...besides the fact that the world became warm and wet over the millenia, and the sapiens take this as an enviromental advantage to rule over the new territory...
@abrahamellisjr4757
3 жыл бұрын
Reading must not be a joy to you. Please expand your knowledge.
@PaulJersey
3 жыл бұрын
@@abrahamellisjr4757 read carefully. It’s says “my best guess”.
@abrahamellisjr4757
3 жыл бұрын
@@PaulJersey Guessing is an expression of belief, opinions without fact. better to.. than express ...
@svenwilliamson406
Жыл бұрын
Cut the silly close-ups of the audience will ya!? Doing some three second visual comparison between the skull on display and the audience Homo delegatus is dumb. Spend more time on the slides or the lecturer; they are what we came to see.
@jon1rene
3 жыл бұрын
Neanderthal editing 🙄
@annepark5257
3 жыл бұрын
You were so wrong!!
@omygodchick
3 жыл бұрын
Nope 👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽👎🏽🤬😒🤞🏽🧐🧐study
@meredithmericle7487
2 жыл бұрын
Neanderthals---white-skinned, blue-eyed gorillas. I know someone who looks just like this (no kidding).
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
They are not gorillas, which you would know if you understood genetics.
@meredithmericle7487
2 жыл бұрын
@@harrietharlow9929 Oh, Harriet, dear, dear Harriet, my sense of humor obviously escapes you. Save your comments for those who don't get it. If you knew me you would be embarrassed questioning my knowledge of genetics.
@harrietharlow9929
2 жыл бұрын
@@meredithmericle7487 Whatevs.
@malmalhi007
3 жыл бұрын
6:36
@lisarochwarg4707
2 жыл бұрын
Was that you?
@malmalhi007
2 жыл бұрын
@@lisarochwarg4707 a throwback to our ancestors Miss. Woke!!
@JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C
2 жыл бұрын
Not of Ape descent
@jesusexposed1848
2 жыл бұрын
Albinos u miss me
@caliedon1
3 жыл бұрын
Genesis 25:25 “And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.”
@Lepocoloco
2 жыл бұрын
Genesis 19:1-26. Two angels visit a guy called Lot in the town of Sodom. Every single man living in Sodom turns up on Lot's doorstep demanding to be allowed to rape the two angels. Lot asks the men if they would rather rape his two young daughters instead. The crowd say they would not, so God strikes them all blind and tells Lot and his family to get out of the town without looking back because he is going to destroy it. Lot's wife disobeys the instruction and looks back, so, for reasons that are not adequately explored, God turns her into a pillar of salt.
@gaylecheung3087
2 жыл бұрын
Yawn 🥱
@uppercut2246
2 жыл бұрын
Do you start with & provide empirical evidence of Evolution!? Or do you continue with the already debunked 'Theory'. I won't waste my time waiting to find out. So much for Joogle cracking down on misinformation.
@angelloulou2958
3 жыл бұрын
There were not kissing cousins....They used what they had, others....They didn't know or reason like we do today. Eventually, others came in with 23 pairs of chromosomes, and the species slowly changed over time....
Пікірлер: 180