This is a great lecture on the philosophy of language. Thanks for sharing.
@luyombojonathan6688
7 ай бұрын
Beautiful work !!! Cheers
@BetsyWillie-t8f
17 күн бұрын
Clark Daniel Walker Eric Hernandez Jason
@KripkeSaul
Ай бұрын
Why the constant Kripke bashing?
@rezamahan7109
5 ай бұрын
hey guys! how are ya? I have a philosophical logic exam in 7 days, I love philosophy, and I'm drunk!!! do you have any solution to this dilemma?😶
@albertusmagnus5829
2 ай бұрын
Another great synopsis thanks - Chordate relates to the property of having a spine / backbone aka notochord - but doesnt change the overall discussion 😊
@SimonCushing
2 ай бұрын
Cordate
@dominykamauliute
10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@das.gegenmittel
3 ай бұрын
Is this still a relevant work or is there something more new?
@PhDip
2 ай бұрын
It is still quite relevant - in fact in many cases, the data models used in AI (large-language models and machine-learning techniques use Kripke’s theory of naming with respect to graph-theory). A quite remarkable turn of events for a seeming abstract philosophic concept.
@markpovell
Ай бұрын
No wonder AI is turning into such a clustered cultural car crash - thanks to Actual Traffic Cones along with many other contingencies@@PhDip
@Ricback2
11 күн бұрын
Despite what's said above, Kripke's view is absent from scientific enterprise on language communication and meaning comprehension. Psycholinguists, neurologists debate and even defend Grice, Davidson and Searle, taking these philosophical views as common ground for the field. In philosophy itself, Kripke can still and unfortunately be considered as the main view.
Пікірлер: 13