Excellent! A very clear, informative and enjoyable series of lectures on Kierkegaard. Thank you very much for uploading. I hope to see some new content soon! Please continue! Regards from Ireland.
@reimannx33
5 ай бұрын
Wonderful question at the end to tie together the various concepts presented in the lecture.
@stephenhall11
2 жыл бұрын
The volume on the audio is way too low. I can barely hear it. If it is too loud I can turn it down but I can't turn it up.
@ma7eus97
7 жыл бұрын
But, does Kierkegaard agree with Hegel that Socrates brought up subjectivity into the world? Even though he sees Socrates as purely negative
@Angelicaarchangelica
8 ай бұрын
No, or probably not since Socrates himself would negate such a preposition. Subjective simply is, in terms of what it isn't yet 🤣😏
@Angelicaarchangelica
8 ай бұрын
Kirkegaard was a bony type of individual.
@luancarvalhomatos7888
11 ай бұрын
Bug do contador aos 24:23
@stephenhall11
2 жыл бұрын
I wish I could hear it
@ahmeraslam1003
2 жыл бұрын
So Kierkegaard predicted Nietzsche?
@luancarvalhomatos7888
11 ай бұрын
Kierkegaard is not a anti conceptual author 43:05
@davidhutchinson7771
3 жыл бұрын
Am I finally past Søren Kierkegaard? That would have been the measure of a long life! [and I'd never have been able to finally think it through without Stewart's lectures] But fact is I'm only partly past Søren. Kierkegaard maintained we have to live with disjunctions...no "I am the walrus" for that dude. A place where antitheses remain antitheses. No, not all the time was there oneness for Kierkegaard! But two of his big disjunctions it appears I am past. 1. God telling Abraham he should sacrifice Isaac? No, S/He wouldn't have. 2. God becoming man is an impossibility logically? Not really, Indians in India were looking for Incarnations for nigh on nigh on. Times DO change, don't they? Eras change. Yet, I'm thinking SK still might have been on track re something in his own time, a smaller item...Hegel's philosophy [it is a little strange from our perspective today that SK had NO burning issues to relate to the king of Denmark when the latter repeatedly requested audiences with him]. Pertaining to Hegel, Kierkegaard gets involved re specifics on "irony," something I need to grok a little better. But to me SK might have been right in a more "general" way about Hegel, before you even get into that technical "irony" question [47:28]. Yes to me SK was real right about a "small" disjunction in his own time...he believed it was errant TO ASSUME HEGEL HAD IRONED OUT MANY DISJUNCTIONS. IOW he believed Hegel (the rage in SK's circle) who purported to wipe away so many disjunctions in Nature and humanity...had not explained the relatedness of opposing members in many pairs of phenomena. Hegel was ONE guy that claimed many processes boiled down to one dialectical process. But this ONE guy had sort of set up a pan-western Advaita. To embrace Hegel or to accept reality as a little more inchoate was the real either/or among scholars in SK's time. But in SK's circle it was soooooooo much easier to accept Hegel. This was really a case of disjunctions denied. But Kierkegaard said...NO, bring them all back! It was all a very fixed issue in terms of the period in which it lasted. And, in a similar way, that is where IMO the big disjunctions might be for us today...not just enduring disjunctions [which may end up fewer than we thought], but perhaps there's an equal number, or even MORE of the type concerning this or that temporary "issue," pertaining to whatever flash in the pan philosophy or guru. Or those types of big temporary conundrums on fb where, regarding one or another in particular, it's his or her evidence versus my own. Though the disjunctions we live with today aren't all the ones Kierkegaard thought the most challenging [or at least for me aren't those ones], there are still some around we have to abide. I'm sure he never lost sight of the one where one WANTS to see, yet one sees through a glass darkly. So, Kierkegaard was right to advocate patience in dealing with unsolvables in our lives. Maybe that was the big message of his I've been wondering about almost all MY life. There's not enough time for any one person to crack ALL the explanations out there, but I'm GLAD to have had the opportunity to have seen the whole fuzzy Kierkegaardian landscape lit up by Jon Stewart! PS Anyone would question Advaita?! www.sacredweb.com/online_articles/sw4_bolton.html
@reimannx33
2 жыл бұрын
To much blather - get a job, or serve in a soup kitchen instead of wasting time spewing gobbledygook.
Пікірлер: 13