Oh my god hes alive! You do you man, it doesnt matter how long it takes for you to put out videos, everyone will still come back every time to watch. Goodluck to you man, keep it up!
@lasersaber
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I will keep experimenting and sharing everything I find interesting.
@kil98q
5 жыл бұрын
@@lasersaber Missed you man :P love your video's
@QHQ76345
5 жыл бұрын
@@lasersaber we love man 💕🤗
@goharnawaz9972
3 жыл бұрын
@@lasersaber sir is grephite reduce lenz affect.
@burntreynoldz7885
Жыл бұрын
Pathetic. Comment deletion
@WTF_BBQ
5 жыл бұрын
I think the reason it does not have the same effect as a Copper tube is due to the inconsistent conductive path for electrons. Electricity always follow the least resistance. This is easy for copper. It's just a straight line or the shortest distance. For the graphite, there are areas with high and low conductive areas so electric current follow irregular paths which produces irregular counter electromagetic fields. If you were to make a coil based on graphite, then you are essentially forcing the electrons to follow a specific path that is identical to the behavior of a copper coil. I'm sure Lens law will become apparent. ANd oh, welcome back ......... You've been gone too long.
@kreynolds1123
5 жыл бұрын
I think it has much more to do with diamagnetisim.
@versag3776
2 жыл бұрын
What about carbon fiber?
@jezzamobile
Жыл бұрын
Agree 👍
@magus104
5 жыл бұрын
you were missed
@AdityaMehendale
5 жыл бұрын
1) The graphite rod you have is amorphous in the sense that all graphite sheets are not nicely oriented. Such "compacted" graphite is a poor conductor (much worse than copper) as evident from its resistivity - (between 3e-3 and 3e-6 ohm.m as opposed to 1.7e-8 for copper). This is a primary reason that resistors were mostly made from carbon in the last century. You cannot measure it with the multimeter, since the lead-wires of the meter are much thinner and much longer than the tube you try to measure. 2) If you can get your hands on HOPG (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite), it can be a lot of fun to play with due to its diamagnetism. It is also a better thermal-conductor than copper in-plane 3) For coils, stay with copper :)
@taboosaboo
5 жыл бұрын
1 that all makes sense, but a three digit reading, should easily show the difference, at a fixed voltage. 2 sounds interesting 3 bet there's better
@billiardrichard6351
3 жыл бұрын
@aditya mehendale So what do you think using a HOPG type of graphite to drop a magnet through a pipe of such material will it slow down the magnet or it will be faster due to HOPG diamagnetic properties?
@AdityaMehendale
3 жыл бұрын
@@billiardrichard6351 gut feeling: electrical conductivity will be dominant; the minuscule reduction in permeability (compared to air) shall not play a big role. Note: the HOPG sheets are optimized for thermal conductivity; not electrical. Also, how do you "weld the tube"?
@Markoul11
5 жыл бұрын
*Hi lasersaber,* I am an Electrical Engineer. According to the established theory of EM I did some calculations and I concluded that you have to increase the carbon graphite cylinder wall thickness x5 from the one you have constructed in order to observe the same magnetic breaking Lenz Law effect as the copper tube you used in your experiment. For example, if the wall thickness is 3mm of the graphite pipe you have to increase that to 15 mm. I suggest you do the experiment again so your don't get wrong conclusions which will mislead your future experimentation. Good luck. Markoul11
@tylerpripps4969
4 жыл бұрын
@Lasersaber, I'd love to see a follow-up on this!
@joshuameldru4004
5 жыл бұрын
Hello sir, love to learn and just plain enjoy seeing what you are working on! You were missed, very glad to see you still sharing with all of us your curiosities. Can’t wait for more! Thank you for sharing!!
@electronicsNmore
5 жыл бұрын
Great to see a new video! It's been a while. :-)
@Hack_Life.Everyday
5 жыл бұрын
...and he is back with another big life question answered! We missed you...
@NickMoore
5 жыл бұрын
The tube is an electrical load! When I think of resistors I always thing of higher values as being "bigger resistors" but really they are the smaller load. If you take a brushed motor, solder a resistor to it and spin it by hand there will be very little force resisting you but if you short it out and try to spin it you will feel a significant force resisting you. The shorted motor is a higher load in the same way that the copper tube is a higher load for the magnet. One way to get more brake for you buck would be to increase the speed that the magnet enters the carbon tube or to just have a longer tube, it could be that the braking effects are so small that they are not apparent until near the terminal velocity of the magnet in free air. Super cool idea, and I love the tritium motor!
@HighTekRedNeck
5 жыл бұрын
i know from some experimentation on my own that Carbon and especially Graphite tends to have directional difference or rigid electron path or i guess what you could call a grain that it will conduct in certain directions better than others and that most tubes and are sheets laminated together with resin so that they are good conductors along the length but do not complete the circuit needed to exhibit the lenz effects that you see in the copper pipe that is generally extruded so its a complete tube instead of more of a rolled up newspaper where the path of least resistance is along the length. Rods of Graphite tend to be compressed powder and resin an i'm guessing there are lots of inconsistencies in resistance along the length unlike the uniform lattices of the metal. But i'm by no means an expert.
@loveboyhatch
Жыл бұрын
I stand to be corrected if wrong. I am not well studied enough on the topic yet, neither have means to experiment for the time being. However, it is interesting if by that it means graphite/graphene solid states can be polarized, in such a way that it behaves in a similar manner to rectifiers/diodes. I wonder if there is any voltage reading or any kind of induction going on in this particular set-up with no Lenz effect. If so, how does that compare to a 90 degree phase EM circuit.
@guyfawkes2470
3 жыл бұрын
It does make sense that the magnet went through quick. This is due to graphite containing more positrons than electrons, 'if I'm not mistaken'. So, of course it would slide through faster, the graphite is more net positive and the Electrons are attracted to positive charges.
@jasonwitt8619
5 жыл бұрын
The pyrolytic graphite should work as a core to wrap magnetic copper wire onto. Both would work hand in hand. I'm glad to see your back and safe, we were all worried about you after not hearing from you for so long.
@jamest.5001
5 жыл бұрын
I think there is alot left to learn about magnetics and electromagnetics , there has to be something more out there, something we do not know yet! Something that will change the world, even more than splitting the atom! Keep it up!!
@GiesbertNijhuis
5 жыл бұрын
That.. I find very very interesting.. and welcome back!
@tjncooke
5 жыл бұрын
While you tested linear resistance, keep in mind that your graphite tube was much thicker than your metal ones. For Lens' law, it's current AROUND the tube, as close to the magnet as possible, that is important. Looks like the ID is about 1cm, so about 3cm circumference = L, and lets say that A = 1mm*5cm for both to look at "just near the magnet" in both cases. Copper resistance would be 10uOhm and carbon would be 720uOhm. 72x less current all else being equal. And that doesn't really even get into the other issues mentioned by others. Interesting experiment!
@drbahb1
5 жыл бұрын
So good to have you back.
@KM-es4yx
5 жыл бұрын
Very nice experiment. Thank you for bringing us along.
@MiniLuv-1984
5 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the next video - some of the commenters gave some good hints...thanks. but I am looking forward to your future experiments with the carbon to help me get the ideas expressed in these explanations.
@SuperFinGuy
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back! Probably because the magnetic domains of the graphite are all over the place, canceling each other out. Try to magnetize it and see if you will get a different result.
@Kangsteri
5 жыл бұрын
Old people used to know that there are "reflectives" (metals) that push or pull with magnetism and neutrals (plastic, wax, etc) that dont react. So if iron and aluminium are in the ends of that spectrum, then carbon is the most neutral "reflective" and it needs way more extreme conditions to measure its full accurate properties.
@rmarbertin8131
2 жыл бұрын
I think it will fall faster thru the graphite tube, because it's diamagnetic, so it will reflect the magnet's flux, and much more strongly than the common "levitating" trick shows, because it's contained, and curved. Or maybe not faster, but smoother. Might not even notice the difference. You should try putting that magnet in a small graphite crucible.
@thebeststooge
5 жыл бұрын
Wow, what a long time. Glad you are back too.
@erlendse
5 жыл бұрын
I am sure a graphite coil would work as eletromagnet, but it will likely run hotter due to higher resistance. I kinda expected it to be slowed down some, but not to the same extent as copper, just due to lower conductivity. The copper have high currents (unsure about magnitude, but I know it's major), and graphite would have too high resistance to make it major. Try meassuring with a 4-wire milliohm-meter, your meter was limited by test-leads, and resolution at the lower end of the resistance range.
@elams1894
5 жыл бұрын
Just throwing a theory out there. Unlike copper, there is no dielectric permattivity occurring in the graphite. Although both copper and graphite are diamagnetic, some polarisation is dielectrically induced in the copper as the magnet falls through a copper tube, allowing their dielectric planes of inertia to combine causing drag. With graphite, magnetism is displaced only and there is no dielectric drag occurring.
@redcryptoknight6489
5 жыл бұрын
Glad to see you back!
@blg53
5 жыл бұрын
I believe the reason for the "absence" of Lenz's effect is simply that graphite has much lower specific conductivity than metals resulting in the eddy currents too weak to create a substantial opposing magnetic field.
@kreynolds1123
5 жыл бұрын
It dropped almost as fast as free fall. Try wrapping a coil around the graphite rod and an air coil of the same dimensions, and drop the magnet through tube with coil and free fall through coil measuring the voltage generated in each. Hypothesis: because graphite is a relatively strong diamagetic material, you'll have fewer lines of magnetic force cutting the coil wrapped around the outside of the graphite tube, and thus will observe less deflection in a meter connected to that coil. Other observations. Superconductors are examples of perfect diamagnets, and aside from flux pinned magnets, magnets will float across a super conductor unrestricted by eddy current loss in the superconductor. I strongly suspect a magnetic will drop faster through a copper tube with a graphite inner tube, than the same copper tube without a graphite inner tube.
@tylerpripps4969
4 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you're here. I've missed your videos. I've always thought about using carbon for things in place of other conductors (electromagnets, motors, etc) but I feel that this is not going to work (I haven't watched the video yet). I think it may be because of the non homogeneous nature of the graphite vs the metal.
@daleniggemann
5 жыл бұрын
Try different types of graphite. Glad you are back.
@saverking
5 жыл бұрын
You're back.. Awesome
@nw7696
5 жыл бұрын
Remember why we were forced to use graphite instead of copper for spark plug wires back in the 80's? Extremely low EMF with acceptable conductivity at higher voltages. But there you go, spark plug wire core maybe from a manufacturer that is willing to sell it to you. You will have to find a feasible way to insulate the core though, maybe with a Saran Wrap type tape? All my best.
@robson6285
5 жыл бұрын
Of course gives a current trough carbon a magnetfield but since the, relative, high resistance of carbon it will be a "lossy" coil that indeed warms up much more than copper.
@htmagic
5 жыл бұрын
Cheyenne, if that tube was made out of pyrolytic graphite, I believe it would have slowed down. But the regular graphite, no deal. I have a magic trick where a pyrolytic graphite chip floats on 4 neodymium cube magnets.
@MrFmiller
5 жыл бұрын
A carbon coil is an interesting concept. I'll be interested to see how you propose to make a winding with it without changing the electrical characteristics. Perhaps an impregnated string? Check the resistance. Even then the effective area of a strand would different. Impregnate another string with copper and check resistance and magnetic properties. Maybe a helical glass tube filled with powder? Check that with copper powder as well. Cut a helix out of a tube? Pretty fragile. You'd need to chek that against a similar copper helix. Point is any configuration found to work should be checked against a standard. My suspicion is that there will not be any appreciable induction. No basis for the prediction, just gut feeling. I could be wrong. It's worth experimentation. It might have unexpected results and applications.
@MrEdsster
5 жыл бұрын
Thought you were a victim of one of your experiments. Glad you're back hopefully it won't be so long for the next video.
@westonweber7638
5 жыл бұрын
Try printing pancake coil with graphene ink. Also trying to make a bowl-shaped electromagnetic graphene coil. Another thought would be to coat fishing line with graphene conductive ink and then insulate it with enamel. I also feel that the carbon tube accelerats the magnet slightly. Thank you for the post!
@retiredshitposter1062
5 жыл бұрын
you sir, have a brilliant mind.. I hope you're experimenting on your own too. good luck!
@mahendraguru6269
11 ай бұрын
Yes I have tried this making wire of a graphite but it doesn't make electricity 😢
@bcideinc
5 жыл бұрын
The reason the graphite doesn't slow down is it is porous. Look up the Edward Leedskalnin Perpetual Motion. It works as long as you don't use laminated metal and plate. I've enjoyed your videos and info now I'll give you one. Find one of those little Radio Shack round magnets look for 1/2-Inch Round Ceramic Magnets 5-Pack. Now check and you will see there is a N and a S. Use a gas burner and heat it on the flat side either north or south and it kill one side the magnet leaving you with a one polar magnet..
@vidura1080
5 жыл бұрын
That's really odd, I didn't expect the result, but the textbook science is at least incomplete, when not wrong in some aspects.waiting for results with graphite conductors.As a succession grapheen threatened materials could be used for coils. Thanks for sharing.
@MrZenerTech
5 жыл бұрын
Hey good to see you're still around! Thanks for posting a video after all this time. Really looking forward to more. Wishing you the best...
@ReasonForemost
5 жыл бұрын
@lasersaber Good to see you and your insightful ideas back, and yes, let's keep experimenting.
@bcideinc
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back. What happened to the free energy device where you charge it with a battery and the light stays on for quite a while? I think you were getting VERY close to what Alkua did. I wonder if you put a magnet on there somewhere if it would give the little boost needed to run without having to use the battery to start it? I have many ideas if our interested. How about a monopolar magnet? I"ve got one.. :) The carbon tube is porous, in order for the lenz to work the metal has to be solid. I think a Magnetic field is like water. The more porous the faster the water/magnetic field will run threw it. BUT the less porous the less it goes through it thus the lenz is the lack of going through. Search for the Edward Leedskalnin Perpetual Motion Holder. Using a solid bar it works BUT put laminated sheets of metal it doesn't work. Try this, put a bunch of holes in the copper pipe and see what happens. OR try cutting it down the side and see what happens.
@dijasom
5 жыл бұрын
I predict, it will fall through fast, though, if it was a tube of Graphene, i wonder if it would slow down. as that is much more electrically conductive? neat Experiment, and the concept, of electromagnetism, and graphite, would definitely, be a neat video series, potentially.
@jellyfishjelly1941
5 жыл бұрын
The main thing here is the fact, that resistivity of graphite is ~1E-4 Ωm while for copper it is 1.7E-8 Ωm so it's still 10000 times less conductive. Making coils of graphite may be interesting as the electron-hole pairs keep generating and recombining, trough the resistance would be really high. On chip inductors are a thing but i think they use metalization layer or metalized polysilicon.
@jellyfishjelly1941
5 жыл бұрын
@Reno Simpson 1E-4 is just a fast way of writing 0.0001 (1·10¯⁴) that many programs and fellow robots understand. Ωm (ohm·meter) is a unit of resistivity. You can derive it form the formula for resistance = resistivity · length / crossection -> Ω = Ωm·m/m².
@heavycurrent7462
5 жыл бұрын
@@jellyfishjelly1941 You took your time to explain fully and nicely to him. You deserve a thank you from me even I didn‘t need help reading them. Thank you!
@JoshBate
5 жыл бұрын
It must be because the graphite is anisotropic right? I was very surprised by the result! Thanks for the video!
@xenathcytrin202
5 жыл бұрын
That is very weird. Wait, maybe, this is just a guess, the graphine isn't conductive all the way around, or there is some kind of barior or layer seperation that doesn't let the current flow in a circut to creat a magnetic feild?
@Migueldeservantes
5 жыл бұрын
I'm totally amazed, I was expecting the magnet to take even longer to go thru out! thanks for the video! it'll be interesting to see if if good enough to make a magnet coil!!
@TrentTationnaiseXization
5 жыл бұрын
Eyy welcome back. I like the way you think.
@Salsacola1
5 жыл бұрын
Good experiment, it blew my mind. Am currently working on a project based on your supercapacitor video. Thank you for sharing those ideas!
@QuantumLightTV
5 жыл бұрын
Good job! The effect is quite astounding. The implications could be wonderful for lower emf with electric current?
@lasersaber
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I love your videos. Your illustrations are always excellent.
@victoryfirst2878
5 жыл бұрын
Could using copper pipe that is corrugated make a bigger difference is magnet fall rate ???? Keep experimenting with this idea. Their is some great things that can be made of this stuff. Look forward to more experiments from you lasersaber.
@il51diablo
5 жыл бұрын
nice to see your video again!
@dans-designs
5 жыл бұрын
good questions! im wondering if it has to do with the creation of eddy fields within the conductive material? i know copper and aluminium are great at allowing external magnetic fields to generate eddy fields and currents within the core.. im not sure about graphite...
@BushImports
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks man, you answered many peoples question which was, are you still alive and well, We are all happy to see you are ok. I got the fall rate right on the graphite but I have no clue on the other. The little motor is really cool.
@iandale
6 ай бұрын
That’s answered the question I’ve been wondering. So does that men no back EMF
@markpelayo
5 жыл бұрын
Thank God you're back! Hoping to see more of your helpful videos. :)
@Chris-ny5hv
3 ай бұрын
Awesome video!!!! I've wondered the same thing but had no way to make graphite tube lol. Thank you for making this video!!! Now what does this tell us about magnets current and conductors?? Obviously some "rules" we're not commonly aware of are at play here. Graphite coils would be an incredible test to see.. after this small experiment that would be very worth while... But where would one begin to make graphite coils?? 3d printed powders??.. CNC cut graphite disks cut into spirals, the stack them to make flat coils.. but what about solenoid?
@r4v5t
5 жыл бұрын
I was pretty sure about noninductivity of graphite. Still the real experiment kept me excited. :-D
@GrandadIsAnOldMan
5 жыл бұрын
That is a great question, I really wanted it to fall slowly. Great to see another video from you pop up in my subscription feed :-)
@johnhosky2931
5 жыл бұрын
I’ve been wondering the exact same thing!!!! Yes. Try making a carbon transformer as well. And welcome back!!!! Don’t be surprised if all your new videos get blocked, demonetized, or taken down though...
@EdwinPurmerend
5 жыл бұрын
I think that the copper tube acts like one bic fat coil winding that has a short. so if you disconnect the short by a thin cut, the magnet will fall fast. When you connect the cut, the magnet will fall slow.
@69Atho
5 жыл бұрын
Ok,well that is interesting. The carbon tube conducts just as well as the copper,but when you drop the magnet through it,it dose not have any lenz force acting against the magnet like the other conductive tubes. Why is it not acting like a shorted turn like the other materials ?.
@largerthanlife736
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back!!
@ab_ab_c
5 жыл бұрын
I wonder if having a thin aluminum tube tightly inside a copper tube would make any difference (thinking the magnetic patterns in each metal might be different & cause a novel effect).
@TechnoW1zard
5 жыл бұрын
Copper atoms have just one electron in their outermost valence shell but carbon has an outermost valence shell with 4 electrons. Consider also silicon has 4 electrons in its outermost valence shell. Some mix between conductive and semi-conductive properties maybe
@shanealexander9952
5 жыл бұрын
try this, for fun, take a piece of copper wire and make a jumper from the top to the bottom but make the distance from the tube about an inch. Try a thin wire and then a really fine wire. Vary the width from the copper tube. The magnet is compressing and forcing the static field to move through or at the furthest point but the entire field is within the reach of the magnet so the magnet and the field resist each other. The only 2 (choices) the static field has are to leave the copper or to skirt the easiest point. By making a jumper outside the main effect of the magnetic field, a current will flow. Just like an electrical motor winding but inside to outside. Make the jumper shorter than the full length so your magnet doesn't just pop out the bottom? Also fun to use a variable resister to see the speed difference. Edit: Try it with an led or diode and it becomes a one way Lenz's Law Also try just making the outside of the copper non-conductive with electrical tape, would it change anything? I don't have any kind of workbench but I would take a bet. Edit: would an external jumper with a high resister midway that spun into a coil at the bottom around the base of the tube create an electromagnet at the bottom to slow the magnet further. Second Edit: does that graphite interfere with the magnetic field like ferris metal. Last thing, the inner diameter, the thickness and how much of a static field it holds all matter. Thats my answer
@dhawthorne1634
5 жыл бұрын
The main difference between the graphite and the metals is that the metals have more delocalized electrons. The outer shell electrons in metals are not bound to the atoms themselves; rather they flow around the crystal like an electron soup. Metals with more valence electrons tend to be more efficient conductors. Graphite has three covalent bonded electrons holding the crystal together in a very orderly structure. This leaves only one electron to be delocalized. However, the fact that it does have one delocalized electron per atom is the reason this non-metal is a good conductor in the first place. Small meters like that use a low voltage, low amperage current to test for continuity. Try ramping up the current in those different conductors and things get a bit more obvious. The graphite will begin to incandesce a lot sooner because it does have much greater resistance than the metals when it comes to high amperage. This is why Edison used graphite filaments in his light bulbs. They were the easiest to get glowing and remained the preferred material through much of the late 1800's and early 1900's. The reason we no longer use graphite for incandescent lights is because they are comparatively dimmer, more brittle, require thicker filaments which make them bulkier and heavier and they are much shorter lived than the tungsten filaments that were invented in 1904 in Hungary.
@toochi84
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back!
@UnclaimedVision
5 жыл бұрын
Really love your videos! I am mostly focusing on domes and structures that will last through time.
@sato4kaiba
5 жыл бұрын
Doesn't graphite have higher resistance than copper and iron when present in an electric circuit. If I am correct, the reason the magnet falls slowly is due to the electromagnetic field produced from the eddy currents on the material. Since the resistance of the graphite is so high, the are not electromagnetic fields generated in it. Just My Two Cents
@toofsman
5 жыл бұрын
Hey, I am glad you are back, I also look forward to the findings you have on graphite and it's relations to magnetic fields. I agree with one of the other comments that the lack of eddy currents is most likely due to the irregularities in the graphite compared to the copper or aluminium. If you were able to find a way to reorder the system to make it more uniform it might make a difference. Keep experimenting.
@yethinderragav
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back ❤️❤️❤️
@ryanjamesloyd6733
3 жыл бұрын
Robert murray smith used his graphene ink to paint a bit of a coil (like, just on a piece of paper) and got some voltage out of it, passing magnets over it. (in one of his recent low torque wind generator vids) So I Think it's possible, as induction occurrs. If it is indeed immune to the lenz effects, coating thread in a graphene ink, could make for a more efficient and much lighter motor. If I manage to make some graphene ink, it's something I'm going to try.
@kaecey
5 жыл бұрын
I AM SO HAPPY YOU ARE BACK!!!! Love it!
@TheBdd4
5 жыл бұрын
I was fooled! All 3 tubes have very low resistance. I chose slow magnet fall through carbon tube. Now I am wondering if a carbon coil can be made to operate as a solenoid. Thanks for arousing my thoughts. I now wonder why. I'm thinking about dropping a magnet through a shorted copper wire solenoid and also controlling the magnet's position while it is inside the coil.
@_John_Sean_Walker
5 жыл бұрын
I think the carbon is like wires. The induced current can not move perpendicular, like in the copper. No Lenz. (An open copper coil has no magnetic resistance.) A carbon coil could therefor be very interesting. Good luck with that expiriment. Love to see it. Thanks for the video.
@_John_Sean_Walker
5 жыл бұрын
Laser.
@3amali1
5 жыл бұрын
graphite is very resistive compared to copper, so the amount of current that is generated due to the magnet passing is low therefore the amount of magnetic field generated from that current will also be small. You can try aluminium foil compared to thick aluminium tube, u will find same issue,, it is all about eddy current...
@Markoul11
5 жыл бұрын
Alternatively you can use a pure .999 silver pipe which is 2000 times more electrically conductive than graphite and very diamagnetic to see if the Lenz Law magnetic breaking effect is produced. If yes then you will know that you didn't see that on the graphite pipe because its relative high resistance which hinders the creation of eddy currents.
@allenshepard7992
5 жыл бұрын
Wow, Thank you so very much. 1) I thought graphite was a pretty good insulator. 2) I thought it would fall because the induced magnetic fields would not line up. Copper has free electrons, Carbon bonds more completely. I think the bonding prevents the induced field as the conducted electrons scatter , with different polirizations, through the material. They do not all line up. Would coils work. Willing to bet a beer that it would work. Why? Sufficient amperage creates a path of electrons flowing over the skin of the carbon creating a magnetic filed. PLEASE try it and let us know.
@hoptownsfinest703
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back sir!
@hoptownsfinest703
5 жыл бұрын
Also I forgot to ask sir. Will you be selling products on teslamaker.com/ ? I really would like to purchase a simple pulse motor.
@robertjonessr.4187
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back
@consciousenergies
5 жыл бұрын
Welcome back good sire and a great question to ask nature. From some of my own past experiments I have done, I notice different effects depending on the carbon alignment. This is delving into the realm of nanotechnology and how to develop crystals in different orientations. Don't be a stranger my friend 🙏
@Markoul11
5 жыл бұрын
graphite is is much more relative diamagnetic than cooper which is slightly diamagnetic and aluminum which is paramagnetic such as no eddy currents or very little are magnetically induced on the graphite that would exhibit an observable Lenz law effect you are demonstrating. It's more or less like trying to get the effect out of of a wooden pipe even if you could make somehow the wood to be electric conductive. Do you think you would get the Lenz Law effect?
@FreeenergyDan
5 жыл бұрын
Good to see you back making videos. Very interesting experiment. I've seen magnetic induction heaters heat up a copper pipe that is close to the magnets as they spin. I wonder if graphite would heat up. You wouldn't need a copper coil, just a big hunk of graphite like you've got
@Reza-nu9gn
5 жыл бұрын
He's Back!
@dremaboy777
5 жыл бұрын
VERY interesting. looking forward to see where to go with this. i thought it would experience drag. if a coil made of that material can produce a magnetic field... that's somewhat of a game changer. elimination of ferrous material, is elimination of lenz. Got me thinking of painting to pancake coils of graphene/graphite ink; lay them on top of each other, and see if the joule their circuit works. Hmmmmmm
@letropchiant
5 жыл бұрын
What if you make a longer one? How much speed could it reach? Is it possible for you to try taking apart those magnets and glue them in a way to have the same pole in each side then see what happens while putting them in each tube? And is it possible for you to get the weight of the magnet outside and then inside the tube (when the motion is done)? thx
@XXCoder
5 жыл бұрын
Wow you're back! Been a while. :)
@musikSkool
5 жыл бұрын
Brass, lead? Just curious. Cody's Lab might even try it with silver or gold if you ask nicely.
@PaulMillard1973
5 жыл бұрын
It's odd, I thought that because it had the same conductivity, it would act just like the copper. But clearly it's two completely different behaviours being two different materials. Presumably it would be based on the arrangement of electrons throughout the atomic structure that defines the behaviour of the induced magnetic field?
@AlienRelics
5 жыл бұрын
OK, I paused at 1:52. I think it will fall slower than outside a tube, but faster than through a copper or aluminum tube of the same wall thickness and diameters. Simply because it is higher resistance, so the energy is dissipated more quickly.
@AlienRelics
5 жыл бұрын
Wow. I thought there would be more slowing in the carbon tube.
@pamparampa3046
5 жыл бұрын
Good to see you again :-)
@gregoryreese8491
3 жыл бұрын
Have you tried to construct a coil of prolytic graphite? I did; what do _you_ think happened when I dropped a cylindrical magnet through it? How about a spherical magnet, same result or different? ; ) BTW, your spinning device is just about the coolest thing I've seen in years, _absolutely wonderful!_
@versag3776
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe try carbon fiber wire... Was thinking about doing this as well. You're talking about pyrolytic graphite... Diamagnetic
@taboosaboo
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I've been wondering the same thing. I'm not surprised that material choices matter!.. but I am surprised how dramatic a difference! . It is not an electromagnetic effect! It's a material magnetic effect. Magnetic material Electra effect? ... There will be different combinations. Thank you again so much
@cragmc8386
5 жыл бұрын
Great to have you back! Loving your soln setups and also the boost box. Have you made the next version of that yet?
@Markoul11
5 жыл бұрын
However this experiment is very interesting nevertheless. I wonder if the graphite will be pushed away by a moving strong magnet, the same used in the pipe Lenz experiment ? I really doubt it. Of course all materials are partially diamagnetic and paramagnetic at the same time. However the dominant property of the two in the material is which makes them diamagnetic or paramagnetic in total. Seems that if you use a much stronger magnet you will get the Lenz effect on the graphite pipe... try it.
@SkyValleyStuff
5 жыл бұрын
Ive been obsessed with magnets since i was a kid. i have many designs ive rawn, but money always stops me from makin any of them. One day though.. :)
@alpha_hank1595
5 жыл бұрын
Good to see you back! Have you ever experimented with crystal cells replacing solar panels for any of your Soln projects?... As for the Lens law issues; it might help to realize electrons are not actually particles but rather the point where a line of force crosses another line of force.
@landonferguson7282
5 жыл бұрын
Nice vid. I have an experiment of my own that uses len'z law. I want to see if spining some magnets inside the center of an aluminum heat sink that I drilled a hole in, would be an efficient heater or not. I know the magnetic drag creates heat, but I can't find out if using the eddy currents to create heat would be efficent. The only thing that comes up is how to minimize eddy currents, which is the polar opposite of my goal.
@diveflyfish
5 жыл бұрын
Latrice imperfections in the graphite layers can produce dipoles. See article Room Temperture ferromagnetism in Graphite driven by a two dimensional network I’d point defects Nature Physics 5 Oct 4, 2009 pg 840-844. Also could be due to iron contamination as well. Interesting gross level effect with rotational spin and faraday disc
Пікірлер: 301