Have an interesting Single-Cut comparison cued up for you guys this week! Some unusual shared history between these two models too Let me know which guitar you guys thought sounded the best! Enjoy :) Guitar links: Epiphone 1959 - sweetwater.sjv.io/baO0bx PRS McCarty SE - sweetwater.sjv.io/21aJkO
@robertlucas9867
Жыл бұрын
Idk, both are very close. If I had money I’d buy both. 😅 But I’m partial to PRS because of consistency, modern clarity and looks but I love both.
@russellzauner
Жыл бұрын
FGN Neo Classic
@joeformayor
Жыл бұрын
Even though I agree the PRS is stunning. Les Paul wins on just being CLASSIC…. To me I will always remember being a kid and seeing Slash play on this goddess of a guitar and being hooked ever since. I associate certain times in music history and it makes me think of Les Paul. Just like to me a Fender I associate with Eric Clapton. Anyway great video as always!
@henrymrowicki7004
Жыл бұрын
The epiphone edges it out clean, little closer dirty. I have the epi 59 and an older 2014 se custom 24, im probably going to put a set of the burst buckers in the prs. I still like that McCarty quite a bit, wouldn't toss it out the bed.
@JayDoge
Жыл бұрын
Hey Darrel, can you do an epic PAF shoutout with Epi 59', Sire L7, PRS Starla, PRS McCarty SE, Schecter Jack Fowler, Charvel Pro-Mod So-Cal Style 2 24 2PT etc?
@joshuakincheloe
Жыл бұрын
Tonally you got to have both. The stereo width double tracking with one of these on the left and one of these on the right would be amazing. The Paul Reed Smith has a lot more mids and highs and there’s so much more chonk in the 59 Les Paul, that it would just sound superb together, I say, get both! I would definitely use the Paul Reed Smith more for lead tones too. Yep you got to have both.
@tazman4103
Жыл бұрын
The Allman Brothers, Shades of two worlds. Track 5 "get on with your life" is the example you're looking for. Dicky Betts is playing a PRS And Warren Haynes on a Les Paul
@rickbullock4331
Жыл бұрын
I personally like the satin look on the Epiphone. As far a sound goes, I found both guitars were vey similar. I’m not a guitar player myself but just love listening to people who can. As always, great review.👍👍🇨🇦
@SubutaiTuul
Жыл бұрын
Agreed, personally happy its a satin over a poly, but of people want it to be more shiney, they can always Polish it.
@ramilrodriguez8340
Жыл бұрын
Liked more the sound of the Epiphone on all your clips. Rounder and warmer with enough clarity. The high gain bridge sounds so good, so much better to my taste.
@mikepj1025
Жыл бұрын
This was awesome. Epiphone has really launched itself to a new level with this guitar and pretty much most of what it puts out today but these ‘59s are incredible. ThESE PRS SE are the best SE PRS has put out to date IMO. At these price points, buying both is an option. Great comparison.
@caleb7107
Жыл бұрын
This video has really been helpful. It's the McCarty all day for me, thank you for the great content!
@poodleguiderpeyes7388
Жыл бұрын
I have both of these guitars, and very much enjoy playing them. Can't gp wrong with either of them. The Epi sounds a tad fuller. At 8.5 lbs it's heavier and also has a thicker neck. Satin or gloss, I like them both wqually. The 594 is lighter & feels modern & is easier to play with the thinner body & nice fret finishing. Ssounds a bit brighter too. Thumbs up to both.
@srwaite7
Жыл бұрын
Hats off to both companies for delivering great value. I love my Epi ‘59 - been playing for 45 years and still can’t believe how good it is for the money. 👍🏻🎸🖖🏻
@chancemiller9340
Жыл бұрын
Poor Country Labor = “Great Value”
@DMSProduktions
Жыл бұрын
@@chancemiller9340 China is NOT a 'poor' country!
@j_freed
Жыл бұрын
@@chancemiller9340 Poor QC Standards = another USA Gibson you send back.
@fr3ak1shh
Жыл бұрын
@@j_freed Returns are a time (and sometimes money) inconvenience.
@Sloozer45
10 ай бұрын
@@DMSProduktionsIf you read his comment more carefully, you might notice his includes the word "labor", your's does not - you haven't yet addressed his comment. Though, China's Supreme Court ruled that the "996" work schedule is illegal in August of 2021, it's doubtful that it is being enforced. So, a highly competitive "good job" in many industries in China where a version of USA's "hustle" culture exists, workers commonly work 9am to 9pm, six days a week/72 hours. Btw, it was similar conditions in USA until "labor" revolted enough and fought to get "organized labor/unions" founded. In 1955, 33% of the USA workers were union members. The unions in USA brought many quality-of -life benefits to families - 8 hours/day, 5 days/week, paid sick-leave, vacation time, etc. You may be old enough to notice that over the last 40 years, increasingly, workers are working longer than 8 hours and more than 5 days; this trend has been the result of the success that the Republican Party has enjoyed destroying labor unions over the last 43 years, starting with Reagan Administration and continuing ( keen observers noticed that in October '23, during the USA Auto industry workers' strike that when Trump went to visit the workers, he went to a subcontractor's shop that was non-union, his campaign put a few people in the crowd holding "UAW" signs; these sign-holders were later determined to be the non-union-shop owner's family members. Of course, Fox News went along with the lie). Republicans' efforts to destroy the labor unions have resulted in ~6% of the private sector being union currently, down drastically from the peak of 35% in ~1953. Back to Chinese labor conditions: the U.S. Dept of Labor has officially placed 6 Chinese products on list that is produced by forced child labor. More recently, the same dept, issued a report noting that the concentration camp conditions by Chinese govt of the Uyghur people includes more than 100,000 of them being used as forced labor and that there is new evidence that this is no longer occurring ONLY in Xinjiang province, but instead the workers are being delivered elsewhere in China to be put to work in other industries. This new development has me wondering about the very recent trend in budget guitars (0ct '23) where all the best "bells and whistles" most sought-after features in guitars liked stainless- steel frets, compound-radius necks and locking tuners can be acquired for $200 US dollars; the refrain I keep hearing from KZitemrs guitar reviewers, "I don't know HOW they can sell this for only $200 ( they have been saying that when these guitars are/were being sold for $300-$400). I want one of these guitars badly. I'm worried about what I'm supporting and encouraging.
@JeroenBoterman
4 ай бұрын
The satin finish on the epi will show more scuffs and marks over time, as mine does. And I quite like that! Gives it its own soul after a few tours. Gloss finish seems to protect bodies way better against dings and beer.
@JeroenBoterman
4 ай бұрын
That bit of history in the beginning really separates this video from others'. Well done.
@drumstrings726
Жыл бұрын
I think the epiphones tone was slightly clearer and more refined. Both sound great though.
@MelodyMaker218
Жыл бұрын
I have the McCarty SE and a Epi Standard Pro and they both are sweet and sound great but the McCarty is my favorite out of the two.
@StephenOshea
Жыл бұрын
the ep has more chime. other than thats i would purchase both
@joshbechaistron791
Жыл бұрын
Epiphone all the way. Not a fan of either company, but the epiphone is kitted out way better, no need to modify it at all.
@gregb6387
Жыл бұрын
Those Burstbucker's really have some personality.
@belgo40
Жыл бұрын
I chosen the McCarty last month, thanks to your previous video, and I'm very happy with this one, I never played on a guitar like this. If I had to do it again, I'll take the same, with another color :)
@andrewbecker3700
10 ай бұрын
After finally breaking down and purchasing the PRS SE McCarty .594 singlecut standard, I can say it's more different than alike my '59 Epiphone LP. Granted the PRS is an all mahogany construction without a maple cap. But the differences go way beyond that. After upgrading the tuners and all the electronics except the pickups, the PRS is just a way fatter sounding guitar. My '59 is spanky compared to it. I find the LP more comfortable and easy to play. I bought the PRS because I wanted a guitar with some lower output pickups to play more bluesy stuff on.
@lunareclipse1482
Жыл бұрын
I think the deciding factor is the neck difference. Some players prefer a bat; others don't. The sounds are similar and amp settings should make both brands interchangeable. Also, most everyone prefers a lighter guitar. PRS does not have an angled head stock - more stable with ageing. I am impressed with the quality/price of these new guitars. So much better than the older ones, IMHO. Everyone can afford a luxury Model T now.
@deckert618
Жыл бұрын
The Epi sounds marginally better to me when compared back to back with the SE, but individually, either one would work just fine for me. I do like the improved ergos and the addition of coil splitting on the SE. Plus, the tuning stability on the SE is way better.
@colbytaylor9805
Жыл бұрын
The Lemon Burst version of the '59 Standard is my white whale...I fell in love when I first saw it and fell in love again when I played it in person
@racerex3159
Жыл бұрын
I have an Epiphone and a PRS. Sound goes to Epiphone but playability and tuning stability goes to PRS.
@PaulyDTheKiwi
Жыл бұрын
Sorry but for me the Epiphone absolutely smashed it out of the park. Don’t get me wrong, I would love either one but to this old fella’s ears, the Epi wins this round. Cheers again Darrell 🤘🏻
@MrTPF1
Жыл бұрын
I've been drooling over a PRS SE McCarty for months now. I love my Gibson LP's, but the SE McCarty is very hard to pass up. I thought they both sounded very close to each other.
@activese
Жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you for all your work, I do prefer the sound clean of the epi, not so dark more articulated or mellow notes, but the prs with distortion sounded more open with more headroom.
@jaminpartanen9058
Жыл бұрын
I’d like to hear what you thoughts on the Harley Benton SC 550 II Gotoh PAF is like and how it would compare to these two.
@dawoud8013
Жыл бұрын
Same here ! she is missing in this video !! i'm about to buy .... :/ ^^
@zeusapollo8688
Жыл бұрын
Made by slaves
@sgt.grinch3299
Жыл бұрын
The burstbuckers sound tremendous. I thought EPI had a more define tone. The PRS is very nice too, but I would go for the EPI.
@stonerjoe21
Жыл бұрын
The 594 has more crispy mid to high tones where the Epi has more low end chuncky. I can find a use for both in my collection!
@robertburns5145
Жыл бұрын
To my ears the Epiphone sounded a little better on the clean tones. I feel like they both sounded the same on the dirty settings. Overall for sound quality I give Epiphone the edge. In looks however, the PRS was far superior.
@karmad3269
Жыл бұрын
What makes the difference on the Epi are the burstbuckers...
@cart4574
Жыл бұрын
They both sound identical to my tin ear. The PRS though to my eye is perfectly gorgeous.
@ozarkpipertony8396
6 ай бұрын
Great video as usual Darrell and at the price point on these, I picked up one of each! Thanks for sharing.
@monstermilkman1411
4 ай бұрын
which one do you prefer?
@modelsandtrains7915
Жыл бұрын
I got a 60s epiphone it’s plays beautifully still would like the 59
@MB57
Жыл бұрын
I love them both, which is a great problem to have at these price points.
@bryanwilliams3665
Жыл бұрын
Preferred the sound of the Epiphone.Nicer pickups to my ears.
@timwhite5562
Жыл бұрын
I definitely prefer the Ep's pickups. Even with the low winding on the 58/15LTs they're pretty compressed. The BB's are much more open sounding. They sound the way a PAF should. Are they set-up similarly? Are the heights similar relative to the strings? I wonder if you lowered the SE's if they would open up a bit. I have a single McCarty S2. I replaced the 58/15 (originals, not the low-turns) with a set of Wagners, paper in oil caps, vintage tapered pots, etc. It sounds great and plays phenomenally well, but it's a pretty specific tone. I've been wanting a double-cut that I can throw a set of Fluence into that gives me a few options and that will be a bit more 🤔…cooperative with higher gain amps and pedals. Something that can be a grab-&-go, Swiss army "sessions" type thing, and something that, while not cheap, i won't be as apprehensious about playing out. I played one of these and the DGT, and I'm going with the DGT. The SE is a great guitar and worth the price and then some. That said, the S2's differences with the Core 594 in regards to tone and the feel of the neck are negligible, whereas the SE & S2 are definitely more pronounced. If I hadn't been already playing the S2 for a number of years, more than likely would have went with the 594. It really came down to deciding "if it's going to be different, then just get something different." Also upon further reflection I think the 25" scale of the DGT puts it more in that in-between zone for my purposes. *You should be able to buff out the finish to a bit of a gloss. I had a Gibson ES335 with a satin finish that ended up getting glossy where my forearm would rub against it. Although that was a nitro finish, I don't think the SE is nitro. I honestly wish my S2 had a matte finish. I actually really like that on nitro finish guitars. They tend to have thinner finishes and resonate more. I didn't think I'd like them as much on a really highly figured AAA/AAAA top, then I saw a Core line with them and completely changed my mind. I think they look better with a matte finish. When I saw it I was compelled to touch it. I was sure I was going able to feel the flame because it makes it look so three dimensional.
@omegad7674
Жыл бұрын
Both sound great, but dirty PRS se pulled ahead for me. Great vid.
@sid35gb
8 ай бұрын
Tone is subjective. What I do know is the PRS will have build quality above the Epiphone. PRS will have better access to the upper registers lots of tone options.
@jcguitarvibe
Жыл бұрын
Hard choice! Thanks for the video I am between these two...probably I'll buy them both but first the Epi! More classic LP sound but the PRS sounds and looks awesome!
@jladams61
Жыл бұрын
Ahh man. This is a tough one. I'm a huge Epiphone fan having owned a few with my current #1 being the Epi Custom Pro Koa ltd. BUT! I've always wanted a PRS. After this nice comparison I have to go with the Epiphone......by a split whisker. It's just thr right vibe in my mind. Its...almost, the original gangster.
@corneliuscrewe677
Жыл бұрын
Loving my Les Paul Custom Koa🤘
@thomasdempsey4870
Жыл бұрын
Got both! I have 3 epiphone 1959s and the doublecut mccarty 594.
@lunarneptune4006
Жыл бұрын
There was something about the McCarty that reminded me of active pickups
@TVsBen
Жыл бұрын
McCarty Core guitars also have plastic buttons on the tuners. I think they're meant to look like Kluson vintage tuners, and you can actually swap them out with the vintage style Klusons. The Epi has a bit more bottom end which I like. The McCarty sounds great, though. Hard to choose.
@BuckFlicks
Жыл бұрын
Man, I bet that satin finish on the LP saves at least a pound over the thick poly that Epiphone puts on all their other guitars. One of the issues I've had with all my Epiphones was that the buckers were too hot and/or muddy for my taste. Those Gibson Burst Buckers sound excellent. I think the LP sounded better in every example, but they were close and both sound excellent.
@paisteplayer1040
Жыл бұрын
After owning several core McCarty 594's I sold all my LP's and havent looked back. Its not just a nicer guitar (prettier) its a better made guitar with all the short comings of a Gibson LP corrected.. To me the bridge is much better, the neck angle is better, the nut is cut better, the headstock angle is better, the angle the strings come out of the headstock is better, all that created far better tuning stability.
@timothyweesner6286
9 ай бұрын
Buy An SE 594, swap the pickups out for Gibsons, and the do a shoot out. It’s the pickups that make them sound different. As far as I’m concerned, the PRS SE line smokes epiphone and Gibson quality wise. Through an ESPLTD EC1000 in the mix?????
@elwynsmiles
Жыл бұрын
I have the Epi ‘59 and it’s awesome 🤘
@donvape336
Жыл бұрын
The prs is so clear. Both the same on crunch.
@garyatkins4479
Жыл бұрын
Les Paul for me
@cuatro336
Жыл бұрын
The LP is more familiar sounding (it's an iconic instrument for a reason), the PRS is better balanced in terms of the tone. They're both incredible values and do exactly what they were designed for.
@taymalloy1604
11 ай бұрын
The Epi sounded better on cleans, but the PRS sounded better on drives, more articulate! Surprised by this. Both are great! :) I would choose the PRS! In this round!
@paulcopsey6573
Жыл бұрын
I have kind of already voted with my wallet given I have 4 Epihone Les Pauls. They just feel more like home. Sometimes when you try to improve or add stuff it just misses the mark & actually loses something. I have always been a bit underwhelmed when trying out a PRS. As for the coil split thing..... have it on a "Classic" & never use it. Bit of a novelty to fiddle with in the 1st fee weeks of ownership, then a case of realising that's not what a Les Paul is about & the real fun is using the pick up switch & the tone & volume knobs.
@anthonymigliaccio5747
Жыл бұрын
Epi is the clear winner
@tjm5492
Жыл бұрын
Darrell...oversawn? Was that with a band saw, chop saw or Japanese pull saw? 🤔 Gotta go with the Epi, but it's very close.
@nicholsjon9472
Жыл бұрын
The Eppi sounds better than I thought it would, but I'd take the PRS all day.
@akwamarsunzal
Жыл бұрын
Personally I think both guitars look stunning. The Epi satin finish is nice, I just wonder how it looks in real life, but I like it. The PRS is a stunner and very showy! The problem.... I just cannot get on with PRS pickups. They seem to do everything "ok" but nothing "great" in my opinion.
@seattleday9690
Жыл бұрын
I would go for the PRS SE Mc Carty. I already have Epiphone Les Paul's.
@alsantariga1085
Жыл бұрын
I like the epi
@yeti1002
Жыл бұрын
Great demo , I'll take both guitars. They both sounded great
@DMSProduktions
Жыл бұрын
VERY similar, but the PRS sounded a little darker!
@OperatorPuski
5 ай бұрын
Very close but I think the 594 sounded better overall
@callenmcclusky4383
Жыл бұрын
I liked the PRS a bit more there was just a bit more bite and modern refined sounding
@callenmcclusky4383
Жыл бұрын
Also looked sexier lol
@GOOSE-1334
5 ай бұрын
PRS for me all the way. The tones and the feel and playability fit be better than anything made by Gibson.
@InspiretoVictory
Жыл бұрын
One is made in China and one is made in Indonesia. So it's a no brainer to go with PRS. As much as I want to get the new Epiphone 58 Explorer, I'll never buy one because they're made in China. As far as what they sound like, that's the least of my concerns. There are so many amazing aftermarket companies out there making amazing pickups, you can tailor your sound to exactly what you want. The feel is more important. The neck profile is very important. Especially on a set neck guitar. I prefer chunky necks as close to an inch thick at the first fret as possible. For some reason, those types of guitars are only found in the very expensive range. For years, now, I have had to go the aftermarket/custom route to build what I like. It's really frustrating because it seems like all the modern guitar companies do the same thing to produce for the masses. Thin U or modern C. Boring. Different shapes and different features, but all pretty much the same.
@stratman9449
3 ай бұрын
i bought the prs SEsinglecut 594 about 1/2 year ago....great guitar....BUT therre are quality issues (which i didn't have with my older korean made 245Se)....fret sprout, failing electronics switch.....so i ripped everything out , pickups, electronics and switches...even the knobs and pickup frames.....and tuners......now all is good and sounds great....except the fret sprout...haha....and don'task how much i spent either.... today i'll exchange the nut with a graphtech one (cheap at 13.-$)...so....would i do it again...??...maybe not.
@ferox965
Жыл бұрын
Les Paul always. Every PRS I've tried I've found to be dead sounding.
@othinus
Жыл бұрын
Epiphone is more smoother sounding PRS is more analytical Cheers from Philippines!
@JTroskaTV
Жыл бұрын
I would go for the refined ergonomics of the PRS. But I’ve got to admit, I think I prefer the pickups in the Epiphone. What amp or model are you using for those neck pickup checks? I struggle with my neck pickup sounds and really like what you’ve got.
@mrbertiep1
Жыл бұрын
PRS has a bit more sparkle, more tone options and the nicer finish.
@jwv6985
Жыл бұрын
In my opinion the PRS is the winner. I just cant get past the head stock design of the Epiphone. Other than that, they are both excellent choices.
@lynnfrancesanderson1829
Жыл бұрын
So… what would you compare the PRS DGT Grissom with?
@enojunior740
Жыл бұрын
Gibson les paul legend🚀
@juanpanchoec
Жыл бұрын
Both are great, but to my ears: neck is much better on the Epi, the other two are a little better on the PRS.
@virgilgiordano4582
Жыл бұрын
I assume by the 3 screw truss rod cover that it's doesn't have a Gibson style truss rod.
@bub2010
Жыл бұрын
You didn't compare tones to the split coil sounds. I own a pauls guitar SE and for the price and extra functionality the PRS to me wins hands down unless somehow they screwed up the coil splits in this model. It can sound SO many ways with the splits.
@tomstegall1346
6 ай бұрын
Trying to decide between these two guitars thanks will let you know what I decide
@tomstegall1346
6 ай бұрын
I ordered the prs I thought that both guitars sounded magnificent but had to go with the PRs on the basis of beauty it’s a great sounding guitar as the epi is very nice sounds from both the PRs just looks better
@tomstegall1346
6 ай бұрын
I did purchase the prs McCarty single cut after watching this video
@leonardszubinski4709
Жыл бұрын
Darrell, why is it that you never use wah wah pedals, fuzz pedals or delay pedals on any of your demos? It would be nice to hear them instead of constant distortion pedals!
@rexrathtar3893
Жыл бұрын
1:45 Oversawn. Is that like another method of cutting logs, like quartersawn and riftsawn?
@wayup76
Жыл бұрын
I liked both but some way I like prs sounds better I all so like lp how much are they you should give prices thank you I love your show
@shanethackeray1988
Жыл бұрын
Both are fantastic, there are subtle tonal differences between them, nothing bad just different. I’d own both if possible.
@dj_tmc
Жыл бұрын
They both are amazing. But, the tonal differences are so subtle and space is at a premium at my house. Annnnd, since I already have a CE 24, I don't think i can justify another PRS in the house at the moment! (yes, they sound even more different than these two. But, I need to save room for a tele and another bass, as mine's fretless)
@IamMusicNerd
Жыл бұрын
The traditionalist in me wants to pick the Les Paul, and I do like my older Epiphone Les Paul a lot, but I have to give it to PRS on this one. Their SE line build quality and sound is just spectacular for the price.
@tomstegall1346
6 ай бұрын
I agree but both are fantastic guitars,wow guitars actually
@clivematthews95
Жыл бұрын
I enjoyed the video 😊 There’s not much between these, they sound so similar. Both of them are so good, so pleasant to the ears ❤. But prs kills in the looks department no question, I think they’re both really good value for money
@WattchomanBrandySavage
Жыл бұрын
Love the classic inspiration behind the Epiphone, but that PRS is just so beautiful.
@bobjohnson7908
Жыл бұрын
I was surprised by how good the Epi sounded.
@stevehuffman1495
Жыл бұрын
Yep. I wanted to like the PRS at least as much, but I think the Epi has better tone.
@cameronclark595
Жыл бұрын
Epiphone has really upped their game in the last few years. I have a couple of their 1961 Tribute Plus models. They look great, play beautifully and most importantly sound as good as any Les Paul coming out of Nashville.
@pads-zr9ln
Жыл бұрын
That's the burstbuckers
@jonathanstrand2474
Жыл бұрын
These days, if you dry the wood properly, CNC is extremely accurate, there really is no reason for it not to be good, the manufacturing process is well known, that why we see the ERT’s and the AIO guitars for well under $500. I bought a 335 copy with a gorgeous flame top, gold plate hardware & gold plate Grover pegs for $465.😳 I installed SD Picks ups and switchcraft parts, a cloth covered wiring kit with CTS parts. Plays like a dream, sounds fabulous well set up in the showroom before sale. Bone nut! Wow! I almost spent more on the case!
@MrPhotonjockey
Жыл бұрын
@@cameronclark595 I have one as well and I second that opinion.
@BrentAdams
Жыл бұрын
Both are great guitars. I'd go for the PRS SE McCarty for the looks & refinements (I like the feel and playability better....That makes all the difference, along with a little more clarity in the sound). Loved your comparison. THX!
@masonbuckley_2
Жыл бұрын
Darrell, it’s been super neat to watch you all these years and see you progress as a guitar player and content creator! Keep up the good work.
@Robbie63
Жыл бұрын
I have an Epiphone 59 and it is a fantastic guitar. Great value for money and sounds absolutely amazing.
@ianasmith678
Жыл бұрын
PRS all day long
@MrPhotonjockey
Жыл бұрын
No way I would choose a PRS SE model over an Epiphone with USA Gibson pickups. I have an Epi 1960 Tribute which spec wise is very similar to the ‘59: plus Grover locking tuners, splittable CTS Pots, Switchcraft input and toggle, USA Gibson 57 pickups. The major difference is the 60s slim taper neck. The Epi sounds as good as my Gibson Les Paul at a fraction of the cost. The new PRS SEs are very nice, but they still have overseas electronics.
@Turbo-D
Жыл бұрын
i don`t like gibson but epiphone all the way here apparently 🙏
@DOESlab
Жыл бұрын
I feel like PRS SE generally have better quality through out all the models. SEs also somehow feel so m uch better when you hold them, and play them, and very inspiring
@GearGasms
Жыл бұрын
I did the 59 a couple of weeks ago on my channel and was super impressed. The PRS sounded better to me though
@Tryggvasson
Жыл бұрын
like the prs sound for the cleans, and the epi for distortion - that low end bump on the prs doesn't help it much there. the epi definitely sounds more "vintagy", and true to the part, but i like the top end on the prs. looks wise, i like the epi more - except the satin finish, of course. but those frets on the prs - maan!
@leevespa4564
Жыл бұрын
Sound very,very similar....but the prs looks nicer.....the epi looks cheap with that satin finish,unfortunately
@andreybyl
Жыл бұрын
Epiphone sounds little better with distortion
@clivematthews95
Жыл бұрын
I also wanted to say thank you for the history lesson 🙏🏾 Love you Darrell ❤
@manbearpig2164
Жыл бұрын
I like the Epiphone clean sound, the PRS distortion, the PRS looks
@paisteplayer1040
Жыл бұрын
I played one of these epi 59's few weeks ago and what made me laugh was that epiphone can do much better binding work than Gibson.. Which is ridiculous considering Gibson has been doing biding for what 6-7 decades,
@datruth9872
Жыл бұрын
I Love my P.R.S. will NEVER get rid of it. Although my Les Paul is fun to Crank On. 😃
@EM-km8em
Жыл бұрын
The Les Paul sounds like cream and butter to the ears with the cleans… it also sounds like a Machine ready to annihilate with the heavy gains… The PRS is beautiful but it cant touch the Les Paul creamy tones
Пікірлер: 450