AWESOME FIND! I just love when pauper uncovers thse absolute not-playable-in-draft cards and makes them look powerful
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@atmaximum thanks!
@jeremyleger712
Ай бұрын
I love the excitement. I feel this way every time I play pauper.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@jeremyleger712 when you find the deck that speaks to you it's so much fun!
@Holden_Prio
Ай бұрын
I've personally been loving your regular uploads! I have been liking playing highway robbery in my list - worth looking into imo
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@Holden_Prio yeah robbery has also been very nice
@HarborMastr
Ай бұрын
Double video day!!! This deck is so sweet, excited to see more gameplay!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@HarborMastr the deck that I can't stop daydreaming about hahaha
@Fry_Guy
Ай бұрын
At 38:41, if you cast rite and then Prophet, you can reunion for 6 attackers with power into 5 blockers and win.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
sadly they don't have trample :'(
@Fry_Guy
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz Fair enough but 6 attackers with at least 1 power into 5 blockers is enough when opponent is at 1, isn't it?
@calebmears3455
Ай бұрын
They have 6 blockers no?
@zackb9383
Ай бұрын
The joy you get playing this deck is... priceless. Keep it up, bruv.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
haha thanks!
@odoylerules1435
Ай бұрын
I think i found a cool pauper combo with a new card. I think ivylane denizen, evolution witness, and wild cantor is infinite damage with evo witness. If you have all 3 on board. You can sac wild cantor and make a infinite big evo witness with triggers of ivylane denizen. I think it works, im not a judge though. Just a thought i had. This deck is awesome too.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@odoylerules1435 that is cool too!
@mayonaise000
Ай бұрын
Now this is entertainment! Pleas keep up the fun jank, it tickles my fancy
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Thanks for coming!
@matthewmagda4971
Ай бұрын
I love to see this. It's the closest thing to a real combo deck since Galvanic Relay.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@matthewmagda4971 it's so sick
@Gio-ff2md
Ай бұрын
OMG nice find! Dangerous Wager might be good in rakdos madness too😱
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@Gio-ff2md oh yeah for sure
@K0L1
Ай бұрын
Lets goooo ive revatched two rubystorm older videos today :D so this is sweet. im gonna make this deck in paper for our next local tournament :P
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@K0L1 one more for tomorrow haha! Then I need to probably break on it
@gijoe3211
Ай бұрын
Loved this iteration! All the other flex slot draw/filter spells didnt quite feel right, but Dangerous Wager is just perfect. Instant speed makes for some sick interactions, not needing cards in hand to cast is huge upside. Love it
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@gijoe3211 thanks!
@magonista66
Ай бұрын
This is a great iteration. Keep at it. I hadn't thought of the familiar.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@magonista66 thanks!
@CosmicCharles466
Ай бұрын
Sweet! Wager looked sick! I've decided to put gut shot in the board after seeing watching, can't always board it in though.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@CosmicCharles466 I think I'm on blessing now. Weird doing these ahead of time haha
@CosmicCharles466
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz me too, I'm running 4 in the board with the 4th fam. The issue is that fams toughness is 1 so the shaman could always sac anothercartifact in response to blessing, I think that blessings still the plan against affinity though because you also need blasts
@888ian2
Ай бұрын
Dude this seemed like such a good deck!!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@GianvitoTaneburgo
Ай бұрын
Fantastic video! At 37:41 you scry-down Apostle's Blessing, but if I'm not wrong, that was gg for you: give protection to colorless and swing for lethal. Opponents' creatures had devoid.
@gustavofigueiredo3963
Ай бұрын
I think it wouldn't work because devoid is colorless and you can't choose colorless with apostle because it says choose a color or artifact, and neither does the job
@GianvitoTaneburgo
Ай бұрын
@@gustavofigueiredo3963 ah, I see! Thanks!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
you're correct thanks!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
I think blessing was printed before colorless stuff existed maybe :/
@oblobear2093
Ай бұрын
This deck is getting crazier. 😅
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@oblobear2093 let's goooo
@baedenne605
Ай бұрын
this deck is so sick; I've loved seeing it evolve. have you thought about adding a copy of fling? it may be useful with prophet against removal or just to finish the game up outright
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@baedenne605 I just feel like it is only good when you've already won so much that a wet towel will win
@baedenne605
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz yeah, that's totally fair
@danielschmidt7143
Ай бұрын
game 2 when you used Apostle's Blessing to scry, you should just do that in your upkeep. you still get to scry your draw for turn but that way you have protection for the turn rather than just burning it in their end step. The more you know!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@danielschmidt7143 well today I learned. Nice one!
@doctafill77
Ай бұрын
Storm is just fun to play. And it's really not so bad to play against as long as it's not too consistent.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
absurdly fun
@devangoad
Ай бұрын
I do miss the goblin matriarch as a way to either search the pinger or a cost reducer but I understand it being hard to find room
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
it ended up being so mid and a lot of mana
@devangoad
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz fair, I was also still under the impression that name sticker was still around for some reason. Actually don’t see why it needed banning lol
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@devangoad stickers were banned as a whole. Wasn't the good guys fault hah
@BrunoAngos
Ай бұрын
Have you ever thought about testing Fling to see how it performs? Sometimes it's more worthwhile than relying on combat (where you can take a Fog, for example).
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@BrunoAngos people suggest this a lot but I general have shied away. I think snipe is a better wincon in that slot because it can win randomly and not need a full chain. When you full chain the world is your oyster
@david_s5693
Ай бұрын
You wouldn't believe it but I was gonna recommend Wager the other day!! I didn't think it would be good because I saw you cast Electric Rev several times before the "go off" turn. But it makes sense cause of how much impulse draw you have
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Awesome! It seems great tbh
@wrybreadd
Ай бұрын
Cool iterations on this deck. Would you consider playing Pirate's Pillage? Card draw + mana and it's likely cost reduced down to just 2 or 3 mana Love your videos man! Keep it up!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@wrybreadd yeah very neat card. Been testing it a little. The problem is just cards in hand
@devangoad
Ай бұрын
Wager is so incredible in this list
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
for real!
@DrSiddha
Ай бұрын
The wager works so well with this deck!
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@DrSiddha not that dangerous here haha
@h8reset194
Ай бұрын
Did you like the "storm" lands better ? In paper they seem better, curious about your oppinion. Also i was thinking B splash instead of G because Black familiar don't die to Snuff, niche but have regen and i think Deadly dispute + Duress seems better vs attriction, ( also a lot of cheap removal for g2/3, pauper always was a heavy interaction format ) maybe is worth the test ? Love the videos man keep the great work !.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@h8reset194 well I thought about going RB but then you're really jund which I think makes it worse overall. What do you mean the storm lands
@h8reset194
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz the old Storm Pauper use the sac lands from invasion xD. And i mean cut the Green for the Black, for the cost reduction maybe go with 4 Nightscape Familiar and 3 of any other reducer since you have 4 Petal + manamorph + the sac lands colors and Black can give you treasure tokens also, it's a ideia xD
@Kirbykopf432
Ай бұрын
how about gut shot in the sb for krark clan shaman specifically?
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@Kirbykopf432 I definitely considered that. I think apostles blessing is the best card in that slot. You'll see it tomorrow :)
@devangoad
Ай бұрын
Impulse or resolve, which is a better name to call both of them as effects? Personally I prefer resolve but only because they stick around for next turn so it’s not exactly descriptive of the effect in general
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Reckless Impulse -> Rimpulse lol
@ValerieEnriquez
Ай бұрын
This deck tickles me the same way poison storm does. I just want to keep drawing cards and killing my opponent as a treat.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@ValerieEnriquez haha let's goo
@ChromeSignage
Ай бұрын
M3G3 at around 38:40 you could've cast a burning prophet, played mountain, cast rite of flame, cracked bitter reunion, and attack for lethal? Or am I missing something?
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@ChromeSignage sadly we didn't have trample
@kingbandit7459
Ай бұрын
In round 3 apostles, blessing pro colorless would’ve won the game, right? 37:42
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@kingbandit7459 if only, but that's not an option
@kingbandit7459
Ай бұрын
Oh is it just artifact? Sorry haven’t read the card in a while
@viniciuspassacantili8692
Ай бұрын
7:08 why you can only scry once in paper?
@user-ze6su9ti6u
Ай бұрын
I think you do scry twice, but in paper if you decide to keep the first scry on top then you don't have to scry again (since you'd presumably still keep the same card on top).
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@user-ze6su9ti6u yeah you just shortcut it. "all on top"
@romandongarra617
Ай бұрын
I really want to buy this deck in paper, do you think the play pattern in real life would be easier or harder? Love the vids keep up the great work :) Just got to the part of the video where you talk about playing the deck IRL ... oops
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@romandongarra617 haha no worries!
@noneofyourbusiness3288
Ай бұрын
I really want to call this deck "GRuby Storm".
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@noneofyourbusiness3288 haha nice! Start a trend
@akuyara4420
Ай бұрын
M3 G1 they didnt have enough artifact to sac or am I messing something?
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Dang I should have made them play it out whoops
@akuyara4420
Ай бұрын
Love it
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@goyohiga
Ай бұрын
Hahaha this is a deckbuilding fest, loving it.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@goyohiga I can't stop!
@NatePrawdzik
Ай бұрын
I think your guttersnipe count is too low and your feldon's cane count is too high.
@SkillsByNiels
Ай бұрын
The worst part of the deck is drawing guttersnipes
@NatePrawdzik
Ай бұрын
@@SkillsByNiels When trying to play 20 to 40 cards, yes, but you only have to do that because you don't have a guttersnipe in play.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
The balance of mana and payoffs has been very difficult!
@NatePrawdzik
Ай бұрын
@@kalikaiz Don't give up! I've just been watching you work the brew and I've been noticing this pattern.
@kalikaiz
Ай бұрын
@@NatePrawdzik do you have suggestions on the ratios?
@Wiggly-T
Ай бұрын
Deck looks sweet! Might brew something like this in the future.
Пікірлер: 98