Should Alpha Fold’s discoveries be made public and not profited upon privately?
@Bill..N
3 ай бұрын
First, BRAVO, the interview was awesome! Second, in my humble opinion, profitability in the private sector is NOT a bad thing but a "catalyst" for wider distribution and therefore the availability of potential future benefits derived from insights like these..
@Thomas-gk42
3 ай бұрын
I think, companies must be able to make profit, to have the capital for progress. If everything is nonprofit accessable, progress will slow down.
@bestofA
3 ай бұрын
Scientist should be able to profit from their discoveries even if publicly funded, if its in the interest of a team of scientists to withold applicable, useful results that they could capitalize on in their own foreseeable future they should do so and view themselves as a tight circle of potential business partners, since cooperation is necessary it would be interesting how one could forge such secret, tightknit cooperatives, at least for an outsider. I dont think i am alone in envying scientists who found success in the outside world more, than the ones who worked all their lifes to receive a mill and fifteen minutes of fame a couple of years short of their demise.
@lastchance8142
3 ай бұрын
No. The work done by those scientists must be protected and compensated. That being said, the elephant in the room must be addressed. Why are the universities falling behind in groundbreaking reaserch and discoveries? Should university scientists be held to higher standards and contracted against leaving for private ventures...at least for specified time frames, say, five years?
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
Like don't mind HUMILITY STOOD UP FROM HIS SEAT AND TOOK THE LOWEST SEAT LASTS! How else? All can Aim unto?
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
My pop Tom thank you for attending unto our OWN! Pop Tom time will say, HE remembering ye once born, to crawling, to walking, and till now! Pop love you! At least I can do is to washed thy FEET and wiping thy tears from your eyes! POP Tom given ABLE to pull down strong holds from all world views to bring to clarity, coherence, and adequacy....shared "i" AM came with sincere conversations and the AM provided Time from Who am I? My pop Tom will say, remember all THY shared "i" AM! Unto all the Who am I Time will say? From Who love with patience, mercy, and grace! Gentle and lowly at Heart! Love you Pop Tom!
@samrowbotham8914
3 ай бұрын
Materialist reductionist give us one small miracle and we will explain the rest.
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
I'm interested to know what this person thinks about Michael Levin's research work... we wont need CRISPR it appears...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
I think interdisciplinary measures are a very good idea that way generalist can see established patterns amongst different fields easier...
@Connor-j7l
3 ай бұрын
Genetic material arriving on rocks from space..being ultimately responsible for our existence here on earth..??? 😐😐😑...pull the other one. 😂 This is exactly the problem with field specialisation...people like this may be brilliant in their area of choice, but ridiculously naive about most if not all neighbouring areas of knowledge...this leads these otherwise bright minds tp make the most absurd, childish statements in support of their theories... Its the Big Picture that tells All... Thats my two cents..😜
@lastchance8142
3 ай бұрын
Still talking about an RNA world at this late date is counterproductive to progress. All the research since the 60's have shown RNA too unstable to survive prebiotic conditions. The chicken egg conundrum persists.
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
If I ever got acknowledged for my contributions to economic advances and got a Nobel Prize for my Ubi proposal system then this would be the best Nobel Prize for me to get because this would give money into the hands of all of the people and minimize the needless suffering of existence. Money makes the world go round...
@bradfordlangston836
3 ай бұрын
UBI will never work. Necessity is what motivates us. We would become depressed and lazy.
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
My own remember can command money come here in front! Remind! How? 1ST, remember thy shared "i" AM and came with sincere conversations just for thee! Also look at thy shared clay FEET MIXED WITH IRON resting upon all dry grounds. GROUNDED! Remember thy FEET shared! God of the Living shared HIS FEET! Yes, thy FEET! My Own here to washed my FEET!
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
@@bradfordlangston836 well we have a inevitability we must face this is the automation problem which is going to lower human value to near zero and do away with 99.999% of jobs eventually and this is a inevitability so it is best to try to address the inevitabilities so we can fix these problems before they destroy the entire consumer Market... if consumers have no money to spend because their jobs have been automated away and therefore they cannot get money to spend in the economy then they cannot contribute to the economy and the entire consumer market and capitalism as it stands completely falls apart at the seams in real time as we see happening before our very eyes...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
@@oliverjamito9902 i have a foot fetish as much as the next person does lol 😂
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler thank you!
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
Yes for anyone out there RNA is far more important then DNA...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
What I think is one of the most interesting things is the second chromosome of human genetics has been genetically spliced but not just spliced it is functionally spliced...
@t.c.2776
3 ай бұрын
are you allowed to say "Panspermia" on KZitem?...😱... 🤔... that sounds like something an angry chef might do in a kitchen...😁
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
3 ай бұрын
Or something a Greek goat god would do.
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
22:30 a higher spatial dimension explains the spontaneousness of Life emerging... if a fourth spatial Dimension exists then infinite three-dimensional Universal potentiality can stack into any size four-dimensional existence and if we were truly in a 3 + 1 System then we should expect to see the relative state or shape of the universe as more rounded but we do not observe this we observe it as flat this means compression inside of Dimensions we cannot observe and stacking of our three-dimensional Universal potentiality... this alone mathematically proves that we do not fundamentally live in a 3 + 1 system and calls for a rewrite... it's a good time for a rewrite we can fix all the problems in one felt swoop...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
So if you don't understand what I'm saying just follow the logical progression of the spatial Dimensions go with me now as I take you down the logical progression infinite Zero Dimensional existence can fit into any size one dimensional existence and infinite one dimensional existence which is just length can stack into any size two-dimensional existence and infinite two-dimensional existence which is a plane of length and width can stack into any size three-dimensional existence because of the extra dimension of depth being introduced. Given this established logical pattern of progression we can logically deduce that if a fourth spatial Dimension exists an infinite three-dimensional Universal potentiality can stack into any size four dimensional existence and thus if we are not in a 3 + 1 System then we should observe the relative state of the universe as flat which we do. The more I think about it the more it makes logical sense that if we observe the relative state of the universe is flat that means there's something pushing on either side to make it flat which means this is infinite three-dimensional Universal potentiality stacking inside of a 4-dimensional object...
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
This is yet another Nobel Prize I will not receive to add to the list...
@julesbrunton1728
3 ай бұрын
@@AquarianSoulTimeTravelerare you ok?
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
@@julesbrunton1728 mos def
@ivanvuksan8050
3 ай бұрын
Was hoping to hear more about telomerase and related stuff.
@MaxPower-vg4vr
3 ай бұрын
Here are 4 more examples across different scientific domains where adopting non-contradictory infinitesimal/monadological frameworks can resolve paradoxes in our current models: 13) Molecular Biology / Origin of Life Contradictory Theories: - Oparin-Haldane primordial soup faced paradox of origin of homochirality - RNA world still has paradox of abiogenesis of first replicators - Contradiction between thermodynamics and information origins Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Infinitesimal Protolife Monadic Transitions dsi/dt = κ Σjk Γijk(ℓ)[sj, sk] + ξi ℓ = f(n1...nm) is monad configuration Modeling molecular origins as monadic infinitesimal protolife transition processes based on catalytic relational term algebras Γijk could resolve paradoxes around homochirality, replication, and aligning thermodynamics/information. 14) Neuroscience / Binding Problem Contradictory Models: - Temporal synchrony doesn't fully determine binding - Spatial EM field theories have intervening causes issues - Symbolic theories face combinatoric roadblocks Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Nonlinear Monadological Multiplex Resonances |Φ> = Σn cn Un(Sα) |0> (superposed resonance states) Wn,m = (monad event coefficient) Modeling binding as nonlinear resonances between multiplexed superpositions of monadic representations Un,Vm over spatiotemporal percept structures Sα 15) Economics / Rationality Paradoxes Contradictory Observations: - Allais paradox, Ellsberg paradox violate expected utility theory - St. Petersburg paradox, Berry paradox defy mathematical rationale - Contradictions between micro/macro economic predictions Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Infinitesimal Monadic Stochastic Choice Pr = Σn pn Un(Ω) (monadic decision weight distribution) U = EY [YΩ] + (1-λ)DY [YΩ] (value function with risk aversion) Using infinitesimal stochastic multiplicities over monadically distributed percept-action mapping Ω and incorporating risk/ambiguity attitudes could resolve paradoxes. 16) Causality / Paradoxes in Spacetime Contradictory Results: - Grandma/Grandchild Paradox with time travel - Uncaused/Trunked Formation of Closed Timelike Curves - Casual Disconnection in Cosmic Inflation Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Relational Pluriverse Geometrodynamics Mμ,ν = Gμν(M) + Λ gμν(M) Geodesic[Mμ,ν](a,b)→Paths[Σnp(n)U(n)p →q U(m)q] Representing causality as paths over pluralistic superpositions of monadic transition amplitudes in relational spacetime geometries could avoid paradoxes. In each case, the classical models face paradoxes, contradictions or inconsistencies due to: - Attempting to derive coherent dynamics from incomplete local rules - Separating physical observations from cognitive/choice phenomena - Requiring strict separability of causal processes and observers The non-contradictory monadological approaches resolve these issues by: - Using holistic infinitesimal interaction rules tied to relational percept/transition structures - Integrating physical and cognitive realms within a unified monadic probability framework - Allowing for fundamentally entangled pluralistic realizations over the geometry itself We see a common pattern - paradoxes emerge from overly reductionist classical assumptions segregating realms that are likely unified at deepest levels of reality. Monadological frameworks restore holistic, relational pluralisms. Whether in biogenesis, neurocognition, decision theory or causality - the new infinitesimal, combinatorial and category-theoretic mathematics of monadological relations is unveiling radically non-reductionist reinstantiations of coherence across our most obstinate paradoxes. By centering relational interaction algebras and embracing irreducible pluralisms, these new model architectures systematically avoid contradictions plaguing classical overly-separable, overly-deterministic theories. We are glimpsing the resolutions that come from realigning symbolic reality-representations with experiential first-person integral structures. The paradox-free future of science may lie in this audacious monadological reinvention - restoring coherent holistic resonance between our descriptive abstractions and the inescapable unified pluriverse reality we fundamentally comprise.
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
Yes, HE is a Foreigner from afar EAST from Phillipi! Forefathers from the West entrusted to raised, fed, cloths, teach, visited to comfort the COMFORTER, and provided Haven for the poor RICH YOUNG RULER Nations resting upon HIS SHOULDER!
@DobrinWorld
3 ай бұрын
Thank you guys!
@DrBrianKeating
3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
@Thomas-gk42
3 ай бұрын
RNA technology is a hopeful developement in the medical research. The chicken-egg joke is really funny, I´ll assimilate it.
@gregoryhead382
3 ай бұрын
RNA & DNA 1st principles can be quantum mechanics equations, to invent or discover the method or process to measure a count, w/o machines, in Relativity.
@Ryan.G.Spalding
3 ай бұрын
Why wasn't amyloidosis referenced as a CRISPR approval? I thought that was the first one.
@BillyMcBride
3 ай бұрын
Thank you both for a beautiful interview!
@DrBrianKeating
3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
@BillyMcBride
3 ай бұрын
That’s a good question! I would have to say that Dr. Tom Cech’s answer to your question about his next Nobel Prize was my favorite takeaway, that he would like a Nobel Prize in Literature! I also saw on Wikipedia that he studied Homer’s Odyssey and Dante’s Divine Comedy in school, both of which I love to read.
@gabeeggers3448
3 ай бұрын
What about Bioelectric influence in inter-cellular communication… like Michael Levin studies?
3 ай бұрын
Brian would be more elegant and appear less insecure (and/or eager for distinction) if he stopped insisting on comparing himself to his interviewees with things like "applies to people like you and me today"...
@dr.michaellittle5611
3 ай бұрын
This was an excellent interview.
@DrBrianKeating
3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
@dr.michaellittle5611
3 ай бұрын
@@DrBrianKeating There were two. First, I hadn’t appreciated the influence of Tom on Dr Doudna and her CRISPR work. It totally hangs together for me now. The second was came from your question about panspermia,and I thought his views on the origins of life in the universe at the chemical level were insightful.
@dr.michaellittle5611
3 ай бұрын
@@DrBrianKeating Having watched his work on sequencing the human genome, I hadn’t appreciated the complexity of new tools that had to be developed for this task, and also his role in their development. Subscribed already to your mailing list.✅
@JungleJargon
3 ай бұрын
RNA is copied from DNA or it is its own information in some organisms. The thing in common with all life forms is the information that orders them.
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler
3 ай бұрын
I think something important to watch is Brett Weinstein on The Joe Rogan Experience Podcast talking about lab mice and how they have been genetically modified to have elongated telomeres... this makes them more susceptible to cancer but also more resilient to widespread cell damage... if we could elongate our telomeres and properly control cancers that arise and keep them from arising we could live for a very long time...
@danstar455
3 ай бұрын
You missed Bret’s point: drugs developed with these mice are a mismatch to humans.
@karolmetal4256
3 ай бұрын
No experiments?... Yeah, right 😂
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
3 ай бұрын
This guy is fantastic. So is Dr Keating.
@JungleJargon
3 ай бұрын
Junk DNA isn’t junk. That’s a misnomer. It’s like saying Puraque is an electric eel. I’m from Puraque and it was supposed to be por aqui quara. Puraque was supposed be mean “around here” quara. So the eel is quara, not puraque.
@danstar455
3 ай бұрын
Junk DNA is sensory interface to outside world.
@eddyimpanis
3 ай бұрын
Evolution from inorganic origins is an assumption which denies the possibility of intelligent design.
@dr.michaellittle5611
3 ай бұрын
As it rightfully should.
@nunomaroco583
Ай бұрын
Amazing talk.....
@DrBrianKeating
Ай бұрын
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
@nunomaroco583
Ай бұрын
@@DrBrianKeating All talk, special things that I already have some knowledge, like the experiment with RNA try simulated early condition in Earth formation and repercussion in life formation...
@JungleJargon
3 ай бұрын
If you told me that folding was so important I might have folded my laundry more. 😄
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
My beautiful shared "i" AM! Will say, Old Woman sitteth upon HIS WATERS! Who ye will say, HE in the midst? Remember come unto HIM! Who love with patience, mercy, and grace!
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
What is a profit? Profit come here in front! Remind! LORD what is profit unto thee? Without all thy Shared "i" AM? Profit who? Ye unlike many! Beyond men's profit can even imagine!
@oliverjamito9902
3 ай бұрын
Beloved remember there's who am I? Nor shared "i" AM come forth! Now why Time?
Пікірлер: 69