Henry M. Quillian III and Toby Tatum lead this episode of Litigation Fundamentals focused on work product, a broad topic under Georgia and Federal laws. Using O.C.G.A. 9-11-26 as a foundation in addition to federal guidelines, Toby kicks off the discussion by defining a work product as an objection raised when a party asks for documents and the other party doesn't want to produce such documents. Toby makes an important point that the 1937 Work Product Doctrine has been amended 13 times, underscoring the evolution of the rules.
Two types of work product are presented and discussed: fact work product and opinion work product. Noting that the burden remains on the party raising the topic, Toby and Henry walk through the differences of the work products and provide a handful of case examples to illuminate the process. The duo weaves in reminders that work product rationale aims to protect certain documents that a party prepares with an eye toward a litigation strategy with an emphasis on timelines.
Негізгі бет Litigation Fundamentals | Identifying Work Product & Material Prepared in Anticipation of Litigation
Пікірлер: 1