If you don't know the album Captain Lockheed and the Starfighters by Robert Calvert, now is the time to seek out this gem.
@Kenzyuzou
12 жыл бұрын
@2three1two ご指摘ありがとうございます、素で今まで気づきませんでした^^;
@josemoreno3334
4 жыл бұрын
I saw a pair of F-104s flying up at Edwards AFB back in the early 1980s. They had NASA markings on them.
@larrydplotner5201
Жыл бұрын
I worked on them 83 to 94.
@kadaosw
13 жыл бұрын
great plane
@user-vm2jm6mm9r
4 жыл бұрын
私のパートナーの父親は新田原でトッガンの名を頂いたらしいです。 マルヨン最高!
@WvhKerkhof
4 жыл бұрын
the f 104 was famous for the sound, we want to hear the sound.
@ticklemeandillhurtyou5800
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
4 жыл бұрын
Those F-104 wings are dangerous. Like a couple sword blades.
@j.jasonwentworth723
4 жыл бұрын
The F-104 aircraft came with wing leading edge (and perhaps also wing trailing edge) covers for that very reason, so that servicing personnel wouldn't accidentally cut themselves on the sharp wing edges while working on and/or around the aircraft.
hige K 最近のは一部プログラムによる自律飛行又は一部を自動化した半自律タイプで基本衛星回線を使用した遠隔操作になるみたいですね、航続距離、操作可能範囲は衛星回線及びGPSによる位置修正機能により搭載燃料の続く限りとなります。 基本通常の飛行機を人が直接操作出来る事は可能で人間と云うリミッターが無くなるので通常では人間が耐えれない様な機動を行なったり速度を出す事もやろうと思えば可能みたいですね。
@user-qs5kb5dr1n
4 жыл бұрын
ん?6分14秒のところに映ってる島って硫黄島?
@tamatama3444
4 жыл бұрын
0:07 に硫黄島って書いてあるやん
@user-qs5kb5dr1n
4 жыл бұрын
0:07のどこに書いてあるの?よく見えない。
@cana5312
4 жыл бұрын
未来都市 右上にiwo-jima って書いてありますよ🎶
@user-qs5kb5dr1n
4 жыл бұрын
Canaボー ありましたw ご指摘ありがとうございます。
@user-rk6gd1ty2d
Жыл бұрын
これ単座機で有人で飛んでるから、UF-104JAじゃなくてUF-104Jが正解なんじゃないの?
@user-mh4gu9lh1c
5 жыл бұрын
ファントムも無人機になるのかな?
@user-kk6wg5xb8l
4 жыл бұрын
ファントム爺さんならば 毎日飛んでますよ~!岐阜の空を。。(⌒‐⌒)
@trdysweet22
4 жыл бұрын
アメリカとかでは無人標的機になってたような
@user-hb4or6ol1k
4 жыл бұрын
今は亡き、ロック岩崎氏がF15を撃墜判定したあのマルヨン
@vgadqwa5908
2 жыл бұрын
ロック岩崎操縦するf-15かf-4 vs f-22、Su-35 勝ちそう!
@timpeterson2738
Жыл бұрын
Sorry but a terrible waste of a superb war bird only to be used once for target practice, should be illegal to do that to fighters like this.
Should have sold these to the ultra-rich. Our tax dollars wasted again by our wastrel gov't. We have two flying now in displays.
@ilkersedat2158
4 жыл бұрын
Very bad fly.dangerous fly
@j.jasonwentworth723
4 жыл бұрын
Not really--Spain flew F-104s, and didn't lose any. The problem was military planners using the F-104 for jobs it was never designed--or intended--to do. It was designed as a high-speed, high-velocity interceptor, to quickly go out, climb high if need be, and confront (and shoot down, if necessary) unknown or identified-as-enemy aircraft, as far from its base as possible (with a return fuel reserve, of course; this could be increased if another home-country [or allied country] base was downrange, in the general direction of the intruding aircraft). But then military planners started hanging bombs on Starfighters (rather like using a race horse to pull a plow), and using them for low-altitude ground attack operations with bombs and rocket pods hung under their wings. Yes, the F-104 could and did function in these new roles, but not very well--but that wasn't the aircraft's fault, as it was mis-used.
Пікірлер: 116