14:55 That is some extraordinary camera work. Thanks for all the effort you put into these videos!
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
You have the same middle name as my mother’s maiden name.
@jazzyjay1150
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision Autistically fantastic
@rodfrey
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision It's actually my wife's maiden name, we both changed our names back when it was rebellious. Her family are all in Iowa.
@crunchygreentea
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision you do have as we say here a "big Irish head on yah"! Love the channel, say hi to your Ma.
@number40Fan
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know what 9 people in this world were thinking when they gave this video a thumbs down. The dance of this CNC machine alone, making this part, is worth the price of admission.
@An0nymvs.mp4
Жыл бұрын
im not an engineer or a cnc machine operator but i find these kind of videos very interesting.
@SMCca
3 жыл бұрын
I'll never get tired of that simultaneous 5 axis action!!
@ICON.Engineering_
3 жыл бұрын
Definitely your channel provides more benefits and practical use than those fancy clips from Titans of CNC. You show a proper way to make money from CNC machine. Respekt
@thefatSquirrel
3 жыл бұрын
That 5 axis machining looked so cool, Awesome work!
@muimasmacho
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine how challenging that part would have been to make for aircraft in WW2, before CAD, CAM, CNC, in inconel. We're not in Kansas anymore. Respect. 😶
@ramanshah7627
3 жыл бұрын
This is so cool - this huge CNC machine pulling moves like that swordfight in the bamboo trees in Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. Being raised on manual machining, I've never seen anything quite like it!
@endemiller5463
3 жыл бұрын
Peter learning something new and it seems so easy for him! I'm still stuck trying to get the stock dialled in! Thanks mate - God Bless
@paulmace7910
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Learning how to use the full capabilities of the machine is always a good thing. It opens up new markets. Next stop is some aerospace work.
@spikeypineapple552
3 жыл бұрын
lmao this guy makes rocket parts.
@billdlv
3 жыл бұрын
Cool Peter! Looks like it was a good learning project. Glad the camera survived.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
There was that time filming this video. The camera with its mag base got thrown into the chip pan (that clip got cut). But the case has been through that before an survived. Thanks Bill!
@ryanoconnor8160
3 жыл бұрын
Deep thanks and appreciation for all that you share and do so that viewers have an incredible window into your incredible world. I found your videos just a few months ago. Thanks to you I checked out Wintergatan. You are both amazing people. Its been incredible watching. Cheers from Brooklyn to Texas!
@jimsvideos7201
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know how it would do if you spun it up to 20k but it's a great learning experience and a nice conversation piece. Thank you for all the trouble of filming the process and sharing it with all of us!
@RRINTHESHOP
3 жыл бұрын
Nice experiment. Skill building.
@expidition07
3 жыл бұрын
That was quite an interesting little project you put together. I enjoyed watching you model it first and how you design the part that you are going to machine and then all the different parts of the machining process. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us and hope to see more of them,
@BruceBoschek
3 жыл бұрын
Invaluable information for those learning these skills. Thank you!
@gerardomarquez2565
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Peter! Your are right, those jerky motions and lines represented in the piece, are because of how the part is model; is something call “UV LINES” that you can check on fusion. For me are like the vectors of how the part was modeled, so when you activate the “lines/vectors” you will know how tool is going to move, because is going to follow those lines; by checking that you can choose the right or most correct toolpath!
@BD-qq4fn
3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing! I watch your work and think about the advancements since tape driven mills (Cincinnati Milacron). Thank you for posting.
@muimasmacho
2 жыл бұрын
I worked for the company that made tape readers. They were bleeding edge technology, 50 yrs ago.
@addisme7561
3 жыл бұрын
If you never do it you’ll never know, practise makes perfect as they say, not sure who says it. Thanks Peter, talents can always be added to with experimental projects. 🤙🏻👌🏻
@glennfelpel9785
3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely outstanding! What modeling and machining capabilities you have. Nothing else to day - Outstanding
@franksprecisionguesswork501
2 жыл бұрын
Great experiment. I helped a friend do something similarly with a big old Fadal machinery Center. The real trick was to use the biggest bits to hog out material before switching to the Pine point
@Parkwoodparkenfarker
3 жыл бұрын
You can't just dream it up, and then expect it to be perfect on the first iteration. We are just machinists. Though usually, we have our heads on better than the engineers.
@brentyard2852
3 жыл бұрын
I'm curious how many actual machine run hours you have in this part? It came out looking real nice for your first go at it.
@agie170hss2
3 жыл бұрын
Pretty awesome result for a first crack at it Peter!
@СергейБережной-ш3щ
3 жыл бұрын
А ты крутой дядька!)) Отличная работа!))
@extradimension7356
3 жыл бұрын
Very watchable - come out better than what I was expecting (all things considered) - compared to some I have seen that's a great 1st impeller :-)
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Extra Dimension!
@Ujeb08
3 жыл бұрын
As a machinist who did mostly 3 axis machining for all of my career, I can really appreciate this demonstration of 5 axis work. I don't understand it all but seeing it broken down the way you did gave me some understanding. The coordination of all of the axes during a blade is mind-blowing! I really enjoyed it. thanks.
@medievalhamster
3 жыл бұрын
It appears I'm not the only one who gets bored on a Wednesday and sees what sort of goofy stuff I can do with a computer.
@jerrooney8714
3 жыл бұрын
Stunning to see the mazak running in 5 axis.
@michaelmoore1779
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know anything about cad or machining but i sure do like shiny!
@creed6.549
3 жыл бұрын
very awesome shows you always learn something by doing it 👍
@a222parker
3 жыл бұрын
When you model the two curved surfaces to be tangent only you'll see thier boundary in the reflection. To remove that, the model needs to be curvature continuous - tangent + the rate of change of curvature between the two surfaces being smooth at the boundary. I.used to do this with surfacing way back. Not sure if some software can do it in solids nowadays.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
The surfaces are tangent. When using ruled features for milling the cam software uses the match lines the call them. It would be better if you can draw straight lines from both profiles all along the surface roughly perpendicular to the profiles. The shape I modeled wasn’t that way. This causes the machine to make those kind of jerky movements you saw in this video. I didn’t really think about it till I ran this program. I could have modeled it better. But it was just a quick test. Next time I will know.
@dannywilsher4165
3 жыл бұрын
Much enjoyment Mr. Peter!!!
@bcbloc02
3 жыл бұрын
So how do you reckon they did this job in the 50’s? Hand carved a profile pattern and then stylus copied it using a dividing head to index each blade?
@CothranMike
3 жыл бұрын
Sounds about right. The systems back then could do hydraulically coupled about as fast as those tape driven in the early 70's.
@stephenworsley
3 жыл бұрын
The separate sections might be due to your extrusions not being joined? It looks like you might have created separate bodies which would explain the split lines. I have had fusion seemingly glitch like this even when it is set to join however. I think the large radius may have caused problems too, it looks weird after it's applied. Sketching and revolving this fillet may improve things. Great work as usual though! Thank you!
@Wmbhill
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video
@CapeCodCNC
3 жыл бұрын
Very impressive for your almost first time! Amazing to see such a big machine coordinate movements like that. Hey how are those awesome anvils coming along?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I just have to get around to doing something with that. By that time it will be 100.000 subscribers.
@CapeCodCNC
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision hahaha that will happen faster than you think!
@TylerBrigham
3 жыл бұрын
Thats impressive. I get why they always use an impeller as an example of simultaneous 5 axis work. Do you have to do much simultaneous 5 axis on real jobs or is it mostly positional 3+2
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Rarely is it necessary to do full simultaneous five axis milling. Or at least the kind of work I do. I do quite often do five axis positional work.
@mattnorris742
3 жыл бұрын
Hi Peter, great vid. I'm curious did you make that extra long shrink fit holder? It doesn't look like an extension, I've never seen one like that, nice for that machine.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I have a video showing how I did it. Capto 8 to .250 shrink.
@mikejenkins9135
3 жыл бұрын
Amazing how that machine can articulate
@TomChame
3 жыл бұрын
Very very neat, thanks.
@capnthepeafarmer
3 жыл бұрын
I've found when using Fusion for anything that's more complicated than some extrudes or boxes, using the surfacing tab is the way to go. Otherwise it fails to do a lot of basic radii or other operations. It's no Solidworks, but fumbling around with it you can eventually get what you want.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I don’t usually use Fusion for modeling. I just used it here because I know a lot of people do and the would understand it.
@dimisdnc710
3 жыл бұрын
Wow, every good job sir!
@DavidGonzalez-tc2gz
3 жыл бұрын
Nice job I always wanted to run a 5 axis I ran a 3 axis haas milling machine.. if you need help I'll work for you, I'm kinda far dough in south America
@DavidGonzalez-tc2gz
3 жыл бұрын
Mr pit this may sound crazy but I have a step file part that I was not able to make cuz we had mastercam x7and i see you have a fancy program spaceclaim maybe you can show how to machine it ..any how only if want too, I'm no longer make cheeps I make pizza now, let me if you want to see the part it'll be a good video ...hope you understand I'm not a US native but I was there for more then 20 years
@Duongphan223
3 жыл бұрын
this is a great video, I watched every videos on your channel and learned a lot from you. I saw you modeled on fusion 360, would does it program on Fusion as well?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Not this program for this machine in Fusion.
@bigdaddy7670
Жыл бұрын
I'm sorry Peter, Fusion uses the "Stitch" command instead of the "Knit" command (Solidworks). So, go to your Modify pulldown menu and select "Stitch". Then pick the individual surfaces you want to join into a single surface. Please let me know how this works for you.
@RotarySMP
3 жыл бұрын
Will you continue and turn it into a model jet engine?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I was thinking a blower for a new blacksmith forge.
@jasonhill2180
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision I was just about to say you should make a housing and see how much air it will move. Might be good to turn the OD down to remove the radii on the blades. Glad you're thinking about doing something with it; hope you find the time!
@mep1624
3 жыл бұрын
Amazing stuff.
@sshep7119
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't "merge" command make the three sections into one fin?
@SuperAWaC
3 жыл бұрын
Those surface problems you had, Mastercam just recently added some features to specifically deal with those sorts of things (or what I believe what the issue you had was), reflowing UVs of any surface within Mastercam itself. Fusion360 makes ugly solid models when it comes to 3d and multiaxis surfacing.
@stuarthardy4626
3 жыл бұрын
Peter when you did the extrude in fusion360 for the blades did you use join , if you used new body( default) you get that segmented look to the exude Great to see new videos from you always information Stuart
@micahhunter2706
3 жыл бұрын
Hey, my truck was stolen last week and ended up in Poppy's tow yard right behind your shop!
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Yes there is a auto storage behind our building. That’s also where they towed my truck after my accident.
@Bulldog75stp
3 жыл бұрын
Boy. That machine can do about anything you want, huh?
@hankbauer9121
3 жыл бұрын
If you were making many of these, how much would it cost for one piece? great video as always
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
This isn’t the matching to produce this kind of part. It’s rotary axis can’t rotate fast enough. It can do the motion necessary but it’s to slow. I only did this as a programming exercise. To learn more about a cycle in my cam software. So as to the price for such things I haven’t really got a answer fo you.
@dlfabrications
3 жыл бұрын
As far as the impeller geometry surfaces, you can make them with a sweep function by controlling the rotation angle. Then pattern this shape (circular). Then make a circle sketch and revolve it around the same axis as the rest and set to cut mode. Then chamfer the ends. This creates a continuous CAD form that may not effect the machining side of it.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I would have been more careful with my modeling if I knew how it would affect the milling cycle in cam. Next time I will know. This is what experimenting teaches.
@Eggsr2bcrushed
3 жыл бұрын
If you ever want to run the Integrex off Fusion CAM, let me know. I own a small company that makes custom Fusion posts. I will help you for free because of all the free education you have given this community.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that. It might be worth while for KZitem videos. But for actual work Fusion doesn’t have a good simulation for this kind of machine.
@OakwoodMachineWorks
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision They just added machine sim, I wonder if a machine like this can be set up now?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
@@OakwoodMachineWorks I don’t use fusion but on occasion. As such I’m not familiar with what you are referring to. Are you saying you can model you machine to us in a simulation
@OakwoodMachineWorks
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision Correct! I'm not sure how it does with mill turn, but it appears to have a fairly impressive 5 axis sim for what it is. It's pretty much like what they did with HSM works, which makes sense considering it is the same can kernel
@DanielPerez-bn9bi
3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, thank you.
@loupitou06fl
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. May I ask why you are not using the CAM package from F360 ? Issue with the Mazak PP ?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Fusion as it stands can't handle this machine for this kind of toolpath. Also I don't have a proper post for the Mazak Integrex machine. In Esprit TNG I can see a proper simulation. This is very important for 5 axis toolpath to avoid a collision with the tool or the machine elements.
@gwharton68
3 жыл бұрын
Great video. What is the start to finish time for a part like that.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I can’t really say with all the filming video everything takes about five times longer.
@theessexhunter1305
3 жыл бұрын
never do that on a bridge port....well not that fast lol nice job Peter
@MCEngineeringInc
3 жыл бұрын
Very cool!! 👍🏻👍🏻
@mehsborka7142
3 жыл бұрын
Просто супер 👍
@jonwatte4293
3 жыл бұрын
The 90 degree meet at the bottom of the fins seem like another area that would cause trouble?
@ianide2480
3 жыл бұрын
I may be a little late to this game, but.... In fusion 360, go to surface tools, set your selection filter to select only faces, select all the faces with edges that you want to smooth out, hit the delete key on your keyboard, this should delete those faces, now select Patch, select the outline of the new hole in the solid that you just made, and it should show an outline of the edges so just click on it, click OK, now use Stitch select the 2 bodies and click ok. Now you have nice smooth transitions and no edges.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks I'm no Fusion expert. In fact I don't really use it hardly at all. So I don't know the ways to properly model things. I will give it a try and see if that makes a difference in the cam software's tool path.
@Awfultyming
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome thanks as always. So would you just make a sub and run on g54 and then: g55 A0(72 degrees); m97 p1; type of thing for making this work and then repeat for the whole part. I'm familiar with a hass vmc and that's how it would work I dont know if it's something else for something this complicated
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
It could be done that way. In this case I just manually entered the new C offset and started the program. But a cleaner way to do it in the program would be to use a small macro statement at the programs end. The machines fixture offsets can be accessed by a machine variable let’s say its #7006 for the C of G54. So at the end before the M30 you could say #7006 =[#7006+72.0] than on the next line IF [#7006 LT OR EQT 288]GOTO 1. This will add 72 degrees to the offset and repeat the program (jump to N1 in the program ) until the statement is no longer true. If the statement is no longer true it will jump to the next line in the program. Then M30 on the final line. to be really clean before N1 in the program also set #7006=0.0 so you always start with C offset at zero. I’m not completely sure of the commands in the IF statement it’s been a long time. To be sure I need to look them up. But I think you get the idea.
@Awfultyming
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision ok that makes sense
@TheDayzman
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing
@travisbreeden9393
3 жыл бұрын
Idk if you work/draw your models in surfaces or solids but in my experience cnc and cam tends to agree with each other better on a solid body
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
The model I used was a true solid model. But it would have been better if the surfaces of the blades were modeled in a different way to what I did. Because of the match lines in my surfaces were not perpendicular to the edge profiles. It would be better if the blades were one complete surface on their faces with no breaks. So the ruled features defined in Esprit would interpret that better (If that makes sense) . You could see this in the way the machine moved. It could be more fluid instead of the somewhat jerky movement. Also you may have noticed the tool path in some areas didn't really follow the flow of the edges. So because of me not understanding the importance of this when I modeled the part it caused this. Now the machine was able to machine the shape and I could have got those areas that didn't quite clean up with additional programming in Cam. But I now know after this experiment how to model the part better for this kind of machine work. Thanks Travis.
@travisbreeden9393
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision I ran into this all the time doing tube forming dies. Granted surface finish is not a requirement in that type of work but I like to do my best regardless and make the machine/toolpath run as smooth as possible. I do understand the learning curve of doing cam/cad engineering work yourself.
@prototype3a
3 жыл бұрын
I wish I had a real impeller model to send you to mess around with.
@speartoolmachine7420
3 жыл бұрын
Do you have an impeller job coming up? Or just having some fun?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Just practicing/learning and making a video. No job at this time.
@Krzys_D
3 жыл бұрын
Wow when did esprit get an actual GUI
@SuperAWaC
3 жыл бұрын
Like 2 years ago lol
@davidgottschalk6612
3 жыл бұрын
I learn more from you about machining, trying keep up with my degree love your depth.
@ryannoppe247
3 жыл бұрын
Do they supply u with the post?
@bigdaddy7670
Жыл бұрын
I think if you use the "knit" command you can make the fin surfaces "one" surface.
@EdgePrecision
Жыл бұрын
Thank you I will try that! As I think I said in the video. I'm not a Fusion expert. I really don't use it much.
@bigdaddy7670
Жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision I don't use Fusion at all, but I use Solidworks and we can "Knit" multiple segmented surfaces into one surface with the "Knit" command. Please let me know if this works. :)
@waller393
3 жыл бұрын
Mazak moves well for the size
@cnc-acrylic
2 жыл бұрын
wow⚽
@leichen5474
3 жыл бұрын
厉害 厉害 真的羡慕你 🍺🍺
@ryanb1874
3 жыл бұрын
How would you manually programe that start with a tip location and angle bearing, and just program every axis the degree of change over constant time, what math to connect all this to curvic geometries 🤓🤓🤓🤓
@socoj2
3 жыл бұрын
Just wondering. How much this part would cost if i said HEY make me one? Im kinda interested to Test the airflow on it.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
That is hard to say. Also like I said in a previous response to a comment. This machine is not ideal to manufacture part like this. The speed of the rotary axis isn't fast enough. What you saw in this video is about as fast as it can go. When your dealing with rotary motion. No matter how fast the linear axis can move the rotary axis slows it down to what it does. For a 15 year old machine it can mill the shapes but it would not be fast enough for economical production. My only intent with this was to experiment with this cycle in the cam software. Thanks!
@travistucker7317
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision you could try switching your g61.1 to g64 and see how that goes
@socoj2
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision I was more meaning if its just a Test piece want to sell it for the scrap value and shipping?
@yoky0505
3 жыл бұрын
Wow fusion360 cam program?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
No I used Fusion just for the cad model. I used Esprit TNG. For the cam programing.
@yoky0505
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision oh.. thanks! I really enjoy watching your video. I want to learn espritcam from you.
@bobrunge7594
3 жыл бұрын
Had a 405 for small stuff. Beat the pants off everything.
@刘宇-c8v
3 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏👏👏👏
@chrisyboy666
3 жыл бұрын
Right 1st of all I don’t want to try and tell you how to suck eggs…Your by far a better machinist then I will ever be..But I’ve been on the Apps for years now and I’ve done extensive amount of prg and cutting strategies on impellers..You can’t use 1 size ball mill…Without going into to much detail your right about prg size…A basic impeller can be 1 million lines if code…You need to rough semi finish..wall roughing wall semi finishing then actual finishing and you need a Cnc with @ least 20.000Rpm…and you have @ least 4 different size ball noses to get the detail and finish required…I’ve tried to keep it brief here…Machining impellers is not easy you need skill which you have in abundance but you also need the machine to match …spindle speed and actual machine movement feeds and rapids to get the detail and finishing you require
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I think I said in the video that this is the very first time for me using this cycle on the software. The whole intent was not about tooling or programming for a high production job. In fact the my machine it 15 years old. Although it can do the movements necessary to machine a shape like this, its rotary axis don't move fast enough to do it efficiently. In other words it would not be the machine to use for this in production. As far a spindle speed it will turn 10,000 rpm on the milling spindle witch is a good match for its speed of movement. As I said before I used only one ball mill because tooling wasn't the reason for this exercise. Of course in production a larger tool would be used for the main roughing and progressively smaller tools to refine the details. I don't think I presented this as the best way to do this.
@ehamster
3 жыл бұрын
Stop goofing off and fix the chip conveyor. ;-) Or is this for a home brew pump to empty the coolant tank?
@hypersphereengineering6015
3 жыл бұрын
If they're solids, can't you perform a Boolean Union to combine them into a single solid?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I probably could have. But before I did the machine work I didn’t know it was a problem. Now I know for next time.
@hypersphereengineering6015
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision yeah the CAM will usually crack the shits at the transitions.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
@@hypersphereengineering6015 yes did you notice how the machine was making those strange moves. I think if the model had a smooth flowing surface it would be better.
@hypersphereengineering6015
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision yeah the jerky motion was noticeable on the roughing cycle. The finishing passes were pretty good. The end result still looks pretty damn good considering the CAD model. Like you said if the model was smoother the surface finish might have been better. You have a hell of setup. I have a small 4 axis in my home workshop. I'd love to play with 5 axis one day. Congratulations on the final part. It looks great
@erimora8075
3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@davidgottschalk6612
3 жыл бұрын
hey how s your shoulder?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
It’s not perfect. Or what it use to be before the accident.
@AbbeyRoad69147
3 жыл бұрын
What material is that please?
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
It’s just 6061 T6 aluminum.
@AbbeyRoad69147
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision thanks. I am in dallas. Just got my Haas VF-OE working in my garage.
@wheredidmyhammergo
3 жыл бұрын
Iso, impeller shaped object
@FOOKALLDEMOCRATS
3 жыл бұрын
Do you have an email to contact you at? I would love to come work for you
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! But I only work by myself now.
@FOOKALLDEMOCRATS
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision I understand, I'm 28 and a machinist and machine shop manager for a company in NC, always been a fan of your videos and know filming consumes alot of your time and wasn't sure if you could use a helper, I've always want to do 5 axis machining but haven't had the opportunity yet, I've done quite a bit of 4th axis and live tooling turret Lathes but haven't worked anywhere doing 5 axis, love your videos cause you go in depth on setups and issues you run into, you and Titan definitely keeping the knowledge of machining alive and its greatly appreciated, have learn so much from the videos that has helped me improve as a machinist
@bobrunge7594
3 жыл бұрын
I used to be a Regional Sales Manager for Bostomatic and our 505/605 could out perform accuracy, speed and finish, anything out there regarding impellers…case closed.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
I don’t know about then. But if the Impeller is small enough they would have to be awfully good to beat out a Kern Precision machine.
@bobrunge7594
3 жыл бұрын
@@EdgePrecision Had a 405 that could do the small stuff. I know Kern. Good but not as good as a Bostomatic. They’ve been gone for 20 years.
@bobrunge7594
3 жыл бұрын
Sold 20 of the 400 Bostomatics series to Carrier Corp in Syracuse to put in their plant in Arkansas to do impellars for turbo chargers and A/C units. Then the plant got hit with a hurricane and took the building out.
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
That’s interesting I have no experience with Bostomatic machines. This Mazak Integrex in this video is not the machine to make this kind of thing for production. This was for me just a exercise in programming and to see if I could make the shape.
@bobrunge7594
3 жыл бұрын
Heck of a good job you did as well. If you have a good CAD/CAM system, that’s a good thing. Bostomatic used the same tilting head concept. You’d set the center point if the tapered ball endmill at the B axis center of rotation. Thusly… no motion. Then you’d program to keep the cutting edge tangent to the surface by tilting B… rotating A…. And moving XY and Z linearly.
@pascutioan
3 жыл бұрын
And that is how you TANGO !
@scottsherrard
3 жыл бұрын
You need to combine your model
@EdgePrecision
3 жыл бұрын
The model is one complete solid. Its the match lines and flow in the surfaces that affects the cam software. Now I know.
@bruisedorange5576
3 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else hear the background noise at 6:44 into video? Holy sh*t, I thought an owl or something grabbed up cat outside. I hate when videos do that to me.
Пікірлер: 160