The Metric Halo CS EQ has been quite solid since the early 2000s. This is an iteration of it with a cool solid state extraction. If you dig back and listen to albums where MIO CS was primarily used, they sound like good productions w/ the underlying quality of mix speaking for itself, rather than the digital tools used.
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@truckguy3
Жыл бұрын
Still one of the top 3 for me eq’s always. It’s very ssl like, and just sounds fantastic. A stable and legend for a reason.
@wheneffigies
Жыл бұрын
This channel is always a great wealth of knowledge
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
thank you heaps! stoked that this is valuable for you!
@metalenvyer
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the info on the EQ I've been looking for a good alternative to fab filter.
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
I'm glad I could help hey!!!
@metalenvyer
Жыл бұрын
@@DrMikeMetal I'm glad I found your channel because I'm trying to be a great metal engineer. I used to be a guitar tech in the 80s and 90s I've worked for bands like Megadeth to Candlemas. I'm the Candlemas video Solitude Live. Now that I've retired from all of that I have plenty of time to do my own thing and try to make some e great music. And once again thanks I'll be following you closely.
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
@@metalenvyer that's amazing! Wishing you the best of luck and hoping to help in any way I can
@oleskiyashko2901
Жыл бұрын
Great review. I feel the same when I’m use pro-q because I overdoing to match
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
Yep!!
@paulmistygatz7888
Жыл бұрын
1. ProQ has many keyboard shortcuts, too. 2. just limit yourself when THIS is the only problem. Just set a default preset with let’s say 7 bands and don’t add any other band! 3. it doesn’t matter if they sound the same or not with the same settings! It matters if you can get the same result no matter how you set them!
@DrMikeMetal
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Paul! So this comes from my current experience with MBEQ, and I obviously still use Fabfilter all the time With MBEQ, I find that I get the result faster, especially with notches. They tend to be more effective, and with Pro Q I tend to overdo them and find too many resonances which aren't there. Somehow, MBEQ workflow is simpler and faster for me, and gives better results. This is entirely subjective and just my observations, and I hope that it helps!
@progreggae
Жыл бұрын
thank you for review! please try X-EQ 2 by SSL ! the only thing X-EQ 2 is missing is dynamic mode otherwise its a great PRO-q 3 competitor!
Пікірлер: 15