Very good lecture! I never really understood the BSD conjecture before, but now I feel like I have a pretty good handle on what it says. Hope I can prove it someday, or at least some key results leading up to its proof.
@mashmax98
3 жыл бұрын
there are some really weird videos in your favs
@ashutoshchakravarty2669
2 жыл бұрын
@@mashmax98 💀 dude is obsessed with feet
@danlds17
Жыл бұрын
Another stupid question: Why didn't you start with a more general 2-variable cubic (which includes y^3) ? Excellent talk !
@davidwilkie9551
Жыл бұрын
Prizes for Academic work are a bit of a mystery to students who have their skills in agriculture or physical activity, so the idea of an approach to Mathematical Conjecture from a Condensation Chemistry POV is more effective than turning the pages of recorded history.
@kamilziemian995
3 жыл бұрын
Clear, interesting lecture that is pleasure to hear.
@kamilziemian995
3 жыл бұрын
Excuse me, in the description in the title of third lecture (this lecture) is "Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer". I believe that is a type and it should be "Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer", with one "-" removed.
@Darrida
8 ай бұрын
Sir Peter Swinnerton-Dyer is English baronet.
@kamilziemian995
8 ай бұрын
@@Darrida Thank you for pointing it to me.
@georgemissailidis3160
3 жыл бұрын
12:05 that solution there is actually a special case of a more general theorem. Use the fact that: (m² - n²)² + (2mn)² = (m² + n²)² for all m, n. Now divide both sides by (m² + n²)². The case in the video is m=s and n=1.
@AnitaSV
3 жыл бұрын
s=m/n in your equal m and n are integers, in this it is rational. So effectively they both cover all solutions.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
3 жыл бұрын
Sorry for the very dumb question, but why is Eq. (1) in his video y = s(x + 1) ? I thought the slope is y = mx + b....so how did we determine that the slope (s) is equal to the y-intercept (b)? I feel like I missed something very easy but I can't find where I went wrong. Is it because the unit circle has a y-intercept at {0,1}? Why then cant we use y = s(x - 1), since {0,-1} is also a y-intercept?
@hvok99
Жыл бұрын
@@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 No bad questions. You are right that the equation of a line is given by y = mx+b, and slope defined as rise over run. Here the run from the point (-1,0) to the y-axis is 1 and the rise is how much you went up after one step.. which is the slope. The y intercept IS the slope here. So we can rewrite the equation as y=sx+s and factor out the m to get y=s(x+1) To your point about the negative values, they still work here as plugging in negative slopes will make this work as well.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
Жыл бұрын
@@hvok99 yep of course, that makes sense now. I knew I was missing something simple. Thanks for explaining it well bro!
@darylcooper6090
3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful lecture !
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
3 жыл бұрын
10:24 sorry for the stupid question, but why is the slope equation y = s(x + 1) ? I thought y = mx + b....how did we determine that the slope (s) is the y-intercept (b)?
@ikavodo
3 жыл бұрын
This a specific linear equation for a line with slope s passing through the point (-1,0). We have s= (y - y0)/ (x - x0), so simply plug in P's coordinates to get y = s(x + 1)
@TheMartian11
3 жыл бұрын
Well, in Europe and America usually only the y-intercept form is only taught, which is y=mx+c, where c is the y-intercept. there's actually another form you can derive using the x-intercept instead, which is y=m(x-d) where d is the x-intercept. the guy said m=s and d=-1 hence, y=s(x+1)
@MK-13337
2 жыл бұрын
Starting from (-1,0) the slope is just rise/run. So when you go an unit length in x (from -1 to 0) you go up (or down) a length equal to the slope. So your coordinates after a unit step in the x direction will be (0,s) giving you the y intercept as s.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks everyone for the help! After reading your replies, I realize how elementary this was 🤦♂️
@sunshine4164
3 жыл бұрын
His silence speaks more than his words. How is he at computers ?
@fabiangn8022
Жыл бұрын
Gracias por compartir
@madvoice3703
3 жыл бұрын
THE RIGHT STATEMENT IS BEABLE PRIZE
@indranilbiswas629
3 жыл бұрын
Nice ❤️
@dr.rahulgupta7573
3 жыл бұрын
अद्भुत अति अद्भुत ।डा राहुल ।
@thdgus7895
Жыл бұрын
La démonstration de π(1-ap/P)? Soit la serie Fp(k)=1/2^k+1/3^k + 1/5^k''''''''' vers l infini la série des premiers quelques soit k de N π(1-1/p^k)=1-Fp(k)+la somme de 1 vers l infini de 1/p^n×fp(P+n) et la somme de 1/p^n×fp(P+n)=1/2fp(k)^2 - 1/2 Fp(2k) d ou π(1-1/p^k)=1-fp(k) +1/2fp(k)^2 -1/2fp(2k) quelques que soit k dans N il y a cette égalité ' on peut vérifier π(1-1/p^k)=e^lnπ(1-1/p^k)=e^-fp(k)-@ le symbole @ le Epsilons donc π(1-1/p^k)=e^-fp(k)-@=1-fp(k)+1/2fp(k)^2 -1/2fp(2k) quelques soit k dans N pour le produit π(1-ap/p)=1/Le(1)=e^lnπ(1-ap/p)=e^-Lp(1)-@ d ou Lp(1)= lnLE(1)/e^@ d ou π(1-ap/p)=1/2(Lp(1)-1)^2 +1/2(1-Lp(2))=t(ln(Le(1))^2 l égalité π(1-1/p^k) =1-fp(k)+1/2fp(k)^2+1/2fp(2k)=e^-fp(k)-@ est valable quelque soit k appartient à N
@grimaffiliations3671
3 жыл бұрын
No idea what I’m doing here, don’t even know my fractions
@christopherc168
2 ай бұрын
You can learn, keep asking stupid questions , fail and fuck up till you dont , wisdom comes from experience, experience comes from good and bad judgement, the path to knowing and understanding is endless.
@success_habbit469
3 жыл бұрын
i am not kidding. this problem is going to be solved in upcoming 2 years.project is on progress. believe me
@magisterialanubis06
5 ай бұрын
guess not
@LolIGuess123
3 жыл бұрын
I think the mic used in the seminar is too close to the mouth, lots of lip smacking and breathing distracts from the talking. Maybe run an EQ over the audio and filter the high frequencies
@wtpollard
2 жыл бұрын
Not a helpful comment. Do you really think the people who organized this lecture are reading these KZitem comments?
Пікірлер: 47