This set of leaks is insane and sets up War Thunder for the next five years when it comes to fruition. It is nuts that this info has been leaked and I have no idea how the leakers got a hold of it. Truly crazy how much stuff has come out
@squadenjoyer
2 күн бұрын
please give me a link to those leaks cuz i cant find it in yo discord server
@D0P1C3
2 күн бұрын
9:20 you cover the globe only africa left unless you count south amerika but we have tams in game so all good comrade :D
@TheEuropeanCanadian
2 күн бұрын
@@D0P1C3 AMX exists too and many others
@philliphagan4760
2 күн бұрын
They added the British export Vickers MBT mk3 tank purchased by Nigeria and Kenya. I always thought they should have issued unique skins from those two countries with the tank as options you could grind instead of the British standard ones. It would have brought a little more of Africa into the game.
@Slavic_Goblin
2 күн бұрын
Throwing Balkan nations into the Polish tree is just silly. If anything the Italian tree makes more sense, cause Hungary already got thrown in there. But a better suggestion would be a Yugoslav tree, and then you can even add the Non-Aligned Movement countries in there since way back when they cooperated to a fair degree.
@Luck00001
2 күн бұрын
phillipines being part of the chinese tech tree seems a bit wrong
@soldatjun8763
2 күн бұрын
its beyond weirdness almost like Gaijin is smoking something very good lmfao philippines is a treaty ally of usa and majority of philippine hardwares were western techs tbf singapore also was kinda weird to be put in chinese tech tree as singapore is also a close ally of usa and singapore frequently deploy their troops and hardware to usa nad other western align nations and they even host usa troops in singapore XD
@trentenidk8431
2 күн бұрын
It would make sense if they chnage it from a chinese tt to a multi national tt but idk if theyll do it
@Itisowlcat
2 күн бұрын
Its like putting Iran into Israeli tech tree, As a Filipino, Id rather Philippines go into an actual ASEAN tech tree
@NathanPa-xo3zj
2 күн бұрын
@@ItisowlcatThis. All of Asean are against China , i rather enjoyed The Asean Multi Tree than being putting on China
@dy031101
2 күн бұрын
Singapore is at least friendly to ROC component of China, but the rest of ASEAN...... kinda out of place.
@zzebiasse4258
2 күн бұрын
ASEAN nations for China. Lmao I bet this will be very politically controversial
@tk03_85
2 күн бұрын
The mods have already had to nuke certain forum topics lol
@vendettapurge7452
2 күн бұрын
True It's gonna be a bigger issue, especially in Vietnam and Philippines
@AyedYoutube
2 күн бұрын
At least taiwan and china used to be one country Wtf does ASEAN have to do with China? Some of them fought literal wars against each other and China still has territorial disputed with like 90% of ASEAN
@superabcdet
2 күн бұрын
i wonder what kind of pots, snail lord pets smoking lol. how dafuq ASEAN nations fall under China tech tree?? Singapore and Indonesia using Leo2, Russian jet, F15 & F16. Malaysia using polish tank PT91M, mixture of Russians and American jet Thailand using Oplot ,Gripen and F16
@dy031101
2 күн бұрын
I have a conspiracy theory that Gaijin plans Singaporean subtree in order to avoid implementing ROC units at top tier.
@jPlanerv2
2 күн бұрын
As polish dude i would love to get pl tech tree, but if they are planing to add Poland and shove all it neighbour countries inside the tree as well, it should imo be named East Europe tech tree or some thing like that.
@viktorgrossmann6500
2 күн бұрын
I am Czech and I appreciate this very much. Not to make it all about Poland but about the whole of Eastern Europe. If it's real, though.
@nikolaideianov5092
2 күн бұрын
@@viktorgrossmann6500yes I want to see some cursed balkan s*** T34 62 anyone?
@CrispyPratt
2 күн бұрын
It would be a much better tech tree if they involved multiple nations
@annguyenlehoang7779
2 күн бұрын
Poland in german tech tree take it or leave it
@gicikmard9166
2 күн бұрын
@@annguyenlehoang7779 vietnamese funny name so im not even taking your opinion seriously
@axmajpayne
2 күн бұрын
ASEAN nations could (and should) easily be their own tech tree. There really isn't much need to put them under China, which already has a fairly strong tree. I feel like a lot of players from those countries would also take offence to being put under China's tree.
@AuGTN01
2 күн бұрын
Singapore joining China is crazy, putting it in GB would've been the way to go cause of the British Commonwealth. China literally has 2 other nations with their own special vehicles (Pakistan and North Korea) to be added to their Tech tree. as for Japan, adding either a Thai or Indo line to their air and ground lines would be great. Edit: adding a whole ASEAN sub-tree to China of all nations would be counter-intuitive realistically, remember that half the members of ASEAN are in a struggle with controlling the South China Sea area, especially the current heat with the Philippines. if an ASEAN sub-tree is going to be implemented to China, the whole ASEAN War Thunder community are going to RIOT.
@tk03_85
2 күн бұрын
Previously it was thought that Singapore would just be part of the ASEAN tree for Japan, but people were especially sure that it wouldn’t go to China. Turns out Gaijin didn’t really care about Singapore’s demographics or alliances lol. I could definitely see an argument for a British introduction, but there’s still a whole commonwealth in line before Singapore IMO.
@AuGTN01
2 күн бұрын
@@tk03_85 true, the commonwe has a lot of members. Canada, Australia and South Africa being some of the biggest. Unfortunately most of Canadian and Australian stuff are going to USA.
@armandorodrigues144
2 күн бұрын
soon the chinese tech tree will have the Leo 2, M1A2, F-15 and F-16 it makes ABSOLUTELY no sense, what is even the point of playing different nations?
@Feafdom
2 күн бұрын
Singaporean leopard should go to germany or britain never china
@dy031101
2 күн бұрын
"China literally has 2 other nations with their own special vehicles (Pakistan and North Korea) to be added to their Tech tree." While, from my perspective, the presence of Singapore in China tech tree can be justified in that the country is friendly to the ROC component of China, I as a ROCAF fan am already a bit disgruntled after Gaijin decided to place J-10 behind F-16A MLU, and the idea of adding Singapore to China tech tree makes me even more nervous. ("Can we have Mirage 2000Ei?") ("BuT yOU ALrEadY hAvE J-10~") ("Argh...... then can we have proper F-16A-20?") ("BuT yOU ALrEadY hAvE Singaporean F-16~")
@armoredspain7053
2 күн бұрын
Spain, Poland, Yugoslavia, Switzerland (too late) and Czechoslovakia can have independent tech trees
@superfamilyallosauridae6505
2 күн бұрын
Spain will be part of Italy.
@alexphenex8
2 күн бұрын
Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia mixed tree would be better
@obycajnyneznalec1237
Күн бұрын
@@alexphenex8 Smrť Maďarom ,As long as hungary Stays with Italy i am happy
@brodiemetcalfe4727
2 күн бұрын
I feel Singapore should have gone to Japan
@PWB06
2 күн бұрын
Singapore has nothing to do with Japan. Most of the population is Chinese and they don’t really use any Japanese equipment.
@bruhwth
2 күн бұрын
Or to the British tech tree, since Singapore is a commonwealth country and used to be ruled by the British
@theoriginalcornisgood2.0
2 күн бұрын
No. Britain better. Not Japan. It's just as bad of an idea as going to China (Gonna argue about Taiwan? Guess what, Taiwan is called the ROC. The ROC is the main "nation" in China from tier 1 to tier 3)
@tk03_85
2 күн бұрын
@@theoriginalcornisgood2.0 Singapore would have gone to Japan along with the other western aligned ASEAN nations. Ideally that would leave countries like Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Bangladesh, and even Pakistan to be part of a Chinese Subtree. I’m in favor of Britain getting a full commonwealth subtree, but I think the Asian countries should primarily go to Asian trees (sub or whole). Especially since countries like Britain aren’t exactly limited when it comes to easy sub tree additions / justifications. Just missing Singapore isn’t really a huge issue for a county that’s still on the short list for getting Indian vehicles.
@bruhwth
2 күн бұрын
@@tk03_85 considering Singapore’s history with Japan especially during WW2, its a bit like placing both North and South Korea together into a Korean tech tree.
@ЙоанДимитров-в4ж
2 күн бұрын
Yugoslavia have so many tanks and planes from early WW2, WW2(Croatia Independent State, Montenegro Protectorate), Post-Cold War, Cold War and domestic prototypes build in Yugoslavia that they can form Yugoslav Tech Tree, which will be bigger than Israeli Tech Tree. IF they include the Ex-Yugoslav nations together with Bulgaria, Albania and Greece in Yugoslav Tech Tree can brought to Balkan Tech Tree bigger that Chinese and pre-Atila update Italy.
@Yugoslavz
Күн бұрын
This is what I’ve been saying for nearly three years thank you
@ISAFMobius18
2 күн бұрын
They need to rebrand these multi country trees from one nationally to a group or region tree. Similar to what World of Warships did for some of their tech trees
@SimonSenaviev
2 күн бұрын
Not a single Brazilian vehilce, which leads me to believe these are real
@TheEuropeanCanadian
2 күн бұрын
One day the caralho will come
@agaribs
2 күн бұрын
@@TheEuropeanCanadianLa ele 😂😂😂😂
@archer1681
2 күн бұрын
Why aren't they put the Philippines in Japan? Because WW2? That's not the majority of our relations and history. That would be like adding Iran into Israeli tech tree or India to China same thing with a lot of Asian countries if they're gonna get added. Just because it's in Asia doesn't make it China.
@cocoadesu2918
2 күн бұрын
this makes sense ngl, better than being put in China specially with out current issue right now regarding West Philippine Sea
@darko277u5
2 күн бұрын
we are basically torn up rn, on one hand leakers state a massive SL nerf and increases of Ammo costs on other hand Smin denied such thing by "Hello everyone. As a rule, we do not comment on rumors and speculations of the community regarding War Thunder, because most of you are much more interested in learning about new features and changes from trailers and patch notes. But this time we could not ignore the statement made above about increasing the cost of ammunition and reducing silver earnings by 50%. We did not have such plans in the past and do not have them now. Moreover, as part of the roadmap, we did just the opposite - increased silver lion earnings, and also reduced ammunition costs, and therefore do not plan to revert these changes." his words soo yeah we are basically torn on whom to believe at this point
@Organic_Chemistry_Junkie
2 күн бұрын
Honestly, if all ammunition costs and repair costs were removed, a massive slash in SL would make a lot of sense. If our only SL expenses are 1) vehicle purchase costs 2) crew training costs 3) expert qualification costs, then such a change would be good and simple. SL should be just like RP - it only goes up no matter how you do. Repair & ammo & ordinance costs make things overcomplicated.
@nikolaideianov5092
2 күн бұрын
@@Organic_Chemistry_Junkie yeah feel like it would be a very good change But i dont actualy thinj it would happen
@darko277u5
2 күн бұрын
@@nikolaideianov5092 i agree, if something they always ruin it... i don't really expect that they remove ammo and repair costs, i just hope they leave economy as it is rn, it's balanced for time being and i wish it remain like that
@dotEXCEI_
2 күн бұрын
Smin, the guy who says: guys xyz wont come this update, or xyz was just a one off... And then it happens and he says: haha suprise
@yosef_tetro
2 күн бұрын
The possible SL nerfs are infuriating. Gaijin is trying to remake the economy changes we all rebelled against. We should rise up again.
@SomeOrdinaryJanitor
2 күн бұрын
no way those massive leaks were real, that's actually pretty cool (even if they are going ultramodern. except the SL stuff obviously.)
@Organic_Chemistry_Junkie
2 күн бұрын
If all SL costs were removed except for 1) vehicle purchase costs 2) crew training costs 3) modification purchase costs, then SL could sensibly be slashed across the board. Repair bills are completely abusable and overcomplicated for newer players to understand. High repair bills on some machines encourage ODL (though that's not the main driver of ODL by far).
@SomeOrdinaryJanitor
2 күн бұрын
@@Organic_Chemistry_Junkie of course, i was talking more about the current state. I've been advocating for the removal of crew training and ammo replenishment costs, especially at high tiers where one vehicle can cost 320,000 SL to put in a slot. repair costs i kinda understand being in the game, it discourages ratty/suicidal playstyles and incentivizes learning the game. though i do agree, it shouldn't be Wallet-draining.
@ez230z
2 күн бұрын
Hear me out, minor nations should all live in a combined separate tech tree, than you can use to research any other tech tree. This way you can have a full tech tree and it would relieve the grind somewhat.
@nicolaspeigne1429
2 күн бұрын
Everyone missing the point that the leaks could be 100% real but it could never come, just like some vehicles that are in the files for years.
@oneaboveall1751
2 күн бұрын
As a regular serving in the Singapore Armed Forces, it's quite ridiculously hilarious and unbelievable that our vehicles are under China tt. I've always imagined seeing our Leopards under Britain tt. Seriously posposterous I'll bluntly say, Gaijin.
@divingeagle09
2 күн бұрын
I wish we could get more South American vehicles, even it's own tech tree, since there's a very long list of vehicles and variations of them from a lot of different countries in the region
@user-qq8ek4zs4s
2 күн бұрын
8:06 I beg to disagree here for two indisputable reasons : - A) It would be anything but logical to have ex-Soviet republics anywhere else other than the Soviet main tree , otherwise how do you justify India under Britain main tree ( that would be a blatant double standard be it from Gaijin or part of the community ) . - B) You allege that if Gaijin follows reason , that would cause ''something they don't want to deal with'' , implying some sort of pressure from part of the ''western community'' with dubious geopolitical views . First and foremost let me remind you the ''western'' community in WT is a minority , last time Gaijin received some pressure from the community it was largely thanks to the Asia community and more specifically Chinese community ( which in terms of geopolitics is vastly aligned with Russia ). Secondly you seem to overestimate the importance of the part withing that ''western community'' that shares those dubious geopolitical views . In fact i would raise your bet and argue that if contrary to logic ex-Soviet republics or nations that had strong historical ties with the Soviet Union or Russia do not go under the Soviet main tree that would cause something that Gaijin doesn't want to deal with !
@Cecil97
2 күн бұрын
its so funny how the multi national tech trees are such a political mine field
@exoticdachoo007
2 күн бұрын
Yugoslavia needs to have a separate tree. It has too many different vehicles that shouldn't be missed out on by making it a subtree. I mean they literally have a sherman with a 122mm, do you need anything more? Granted I don't think it gets a stabilizer sadly but still!
@francibalanci5617
2 күн бұрын
My only complain is that ex-Yugoslav countries tech tree isn't seperate because we had/ have alot to offer without taking a spotlight from other countries that weren't a part of Yugoslavia. Tech tree wuld be too diverse, so Poland with other closer neighbours and Yugoslavia culd get their own two ones and still have many vehicles shown without making it a USSR/ Russia 2.0 tech tree overwhelming with to many vehicles.
@brunobegic3841
2 күн бұрын
A Yugoslavian tech tree needs to happen. Then just give them a Greek and Romanian sub tree and you have everything covered: from low tier weirdmobiles to top tier tanks and aircraft.
@RzeTon
Күн бұрын
Speaking as a Polish Man. I'd lose my mind if they added a Polish Tech Tree. But if they would want to add other countries to it. They might as well make the: "Visegrad Group" which is a alliance between Poland, Hungary, Czechia And Slovakia (it was founded when they were still Czechoslovakia),and put all those Nations Tanks evenly so every country has Its fair share of units.
@leeneon854
2 күн бұрын
Phillipines, south Korea should go to U.S, Malaysia Singapore, are commonwealth nations, of UK, china should get north Korea, Vietnam loas Cambodia, Japan should get Thailand,
@charliepulanco4938
2 күн бұрын
may be the phillippines go to israel
@cocoadesu2918
2 күн бұрын
@@charliepulanco4938 not really, even if they helped develop vehicles for PH, doesn't mean it should go to Israel.
@tsukoo-1494
2 күн бұрын
South korea should be for japan only
@thechaozrevenger404
Күн бұрын
@@tsukoo-1494 definitly not
@tsukoo-1494
Күн бұрын
@@thechaozrevenger404 0 reason to join us
@derritter3873
2 күн бұрын
ASEAN nations going to China is ridiculously horrible. They already have a sub tech tree and don’t need the bolster. I feel like this a just to give China the ability to have more US vehicles. Also, as a Filipino, I despise this. I mean seriously? Did Gaijin not think of how some of the ASEAN players would react? Especially with what China has been doing to the Philippines lately. I’d rather have ASEAN to Japan, or an independent ASEAN tech tree.
@resliaamayrilisys4617
2 күн бұрын
true as an indonesia it makes me weird, especially japan main need love
@Sunnyboy-ob4xz
2 күн бұрын
i feel like the two Koreas should get their own techtree, surely there is enough tanks and planes between the two for a whole techtree, if not they can be the host for the rest of SEA subtrees because China sure as shit shouldn't get them. The Korea subtreea make sense but my god are they pointless, China gets some North Korean cold war jets probablly without a top tier while the US gets more of its own export jets, sure sounds like fun
@lestra5
2 күн бұрын
Its really a shame if Yugo doesnt get its own tree.. wtf is a eastern europe tree…
@danielmartens6369
2 күн бұрын
I was really hoping there was going to be a combined Korean Tech tree, but I understand if there isn't
@obsidianjane4413
2 күн бұрын
Cut n' Paste "People are gonna get sick of it" People are already sick of it.
@Leefjuice4005
2 күн бұрын
I have to admit I'm not the biggest fan that chinese gets the Vietnamese tanks or other asian vehicles.... Rather see it as a South East asia as nation kekw
@tofuchanz
2 күн бұрын
I would've preferred a Blue Dragons & Red Dragons faction kinda like in Wargame as opposed to really any of these subtrees
@notazombie...notatall8577
2 күн бұрын
Good thing i've already fully spaded the Skink in the British tree, i get to keep it :> the ran is also pretty cool, Britain 3.7 is fine, but it's a very welcoming addition. Let's hope that we get other low tier additions too, seems like a promising update
@kon_pap
2 күн бұрын
9:19 did you call Greece a central power ? 😂
@JetfireQuasar
2 күн бұрын
Central EUROPEAN power
@nikolaideianov5092
2 күн бұрын
Wants next? Bulgaria being considered a major moon power?
@tkg__
2 күн бұрын
@@JetfireQuasar it's not... it's either "South Europe", "Mediterrenean Europe" or straight up "Balkans".
@JetfireQuasar
2 күн бұрын
@@tkg__ or central because it's in the central 3rd between eastern Europe and western Europe.its not mutually exclusive
@kon_pap
2 күн бұрын
Greece is South Europe and East Basically South East European Balkan Mediterranean country , simply 😂
@automated8493
Күн бұрын
I don't mind the nations having sub-nation trees, but what I don't like is when I'm at the bottom of the tree, something new gets added and I have to grind the ENTIRE sub-nation tree, including several vehicles that I've had on other trees, just to research the main nation tree. Sub-trees should be entirely optional, but should need the main tree researched first, not the other way around.
@questionmark05
2 күн бұрын
For naval, I think the next 16" ship should be HMS Rodney post at least 1943 refit or later. The british have HMS Colossus, dreadnaught, malbourgh, queen mary, orion, invincible, glorious, and now Barham in pre ww1 or ww1 fit outs, only Hood and the event ship Renown have AA and radar. None of the others can defend them selves from air attack, and you can't rely on destroyers like real combat. No more british ww1 ships. US heavy crusiers are early ww2 or post ww2, the early ww2 secondary batteries are 5"25, an AA only gun, or auto 3" but only 2. Only other options are 1 event ship or a rare premium. The next US ship should be USS wichita. The next french should be refit Richelieu, Italian littorio, german, bismark, japanese probably a destroyer since they just got 2 16" ships in a row. The soviets probably Royal Sovereign, the ship they got alongside USS Milwaukee as replacements for italian war prizes whoch make sense considering whats coming next pass.
@Kiefiron
2 күн бұрын
Are Romanian ground vehicle coming in WT or is just a "possibility"?
@Johnson217
Күн бұрын
I'd love to see TR85's. They may be terrible for when they were made, but they have hella chonk armor!
@Kupalski0031
Күн бұрын
An ASEAN tech tree would be more interesting as compared to just adding it to the Chinese Tech tree. In light tanks alone, there will be a LOT of variation. Same goes with Aircraft. But pretty much, it is very standard. Many vehicles of which exists already in game such as the F5s, F16s and Su 27 and MiG 29s. Variation will likely be in the Ground tech tree. Particularly the Light tanks. Many ASEAN nations operate the FV 101 scorpion tanks either in the 76mm guns or the 90mm. However, Philippines have the Sabrah Light Tank while Indonesia has the Harimau Hitam that can easily occupy the Top tier Light tank position.
@GruntBig
2 күн бұрын
ASEAN countries going to China would be quite the power boost for top tier, considering both Singapore and Indonesia have Leopard 2s, F-16s, and (soon) F-15s, not to mention the Malaysian Hornets, MiGs, and PT-91s and all kinds of stuff mainland ASEAN nations have
@superabcdet
2 күн бұрын
@@GruntBig if Malaysia did getting into China tech tree, at least they have the fastest reverse speed and well armored of T72 variant. PT91M hahaha
@dy031101
2 күн бұрын
I'm starting to harbour a conspiracy theory that Singapore might have been planned for China tech tree so that Gaijin can avoid implementing ROC units at upper tiers.
@saplingseedsaccrew3143
2 күн бұрын
8:50 RIP L3
@MP-kx8lb
2 күн бұрын
Everybody discuss about some irrevelant changes in a future, when sb commit child abuse before our own eyes.
@jjhalley8524
2 күн бұрын
Their should just be a united korea tech tree it makes so much more sense
@jochemhoogantink8075
2 күн бұрын
Poland tech tree gonna be op af
@whitefalcon630
2 күн бұрын
Why not throw everything Israel into the US tech tree?
@bruce_invincible
2 күн бұрын
10:30 Wrong. Nobody will ever make people happy, especially in War Thunder. But I can agree that more vehicles can be more fun. But the bigger BUT is, if they both nerf the SL & RP rewards AND add gaijillion more vehicles, then even selling ur soul to snail won't be enough get all of the vehicles.
@henriqmarques_
2 күн бұрын
unfortunaly no Brazil subtree, we have so many interesting vehicles, not enough for a entire tree but for a subtree? would be really fun.
@tplays6688
2 күн бұрын
Weird right? All these Tech Trees and not a South American one? I feel like that would be one of the most interesting TTs out there.
@henriqmarques_
2 күн бұрын
@@tplays6688 exactly, mainly for the domestic designs like the Osorio, Tamoyo I, II and III, Guarani's and a lot more, not to mention upgrades to foreign vehicles like the Stuarts with a 90mm from the AML-90, There's a lot of potential.
@Torples
2 күн бұрын
Honestly they just need to rename the tech trees to better include sub trees in the future. The game is getting too big for major nations to have like two or more minor nations under them
@armandorodrigues144
2 күн бұрын
the idea of adding extra M48's and extra M60's to the US tech tree in the form of a South Korean subtree is, in my opinion, stupid don't want to add it to Japan? fine, wait until Poland is added
@tkg__
2 күн бұрын
Nah, it's about giving US the K1 and K2 MBTs to have a more interesting line-up than "just Abrams" and some K9 SPGs.
@armandorodrigues144
2 күн бұрын
@@tkg__ so South Korea would only be added for the top 2 ranks? where does that make sense?
@Fergusius
2 күн бұрын
Why not just add Yugoslavia tech tree which can then be subdivided into Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia. This is ridiculous. :(
@viktors9385
2 күн бұрын
Israel should really be part of the US tech tree. It literally makes no sense to have half a tree by itself, most of which is US vehicles anyway. Gaijin really fumbled that one, so I have no trust in their tech tree design going forward.
@__Nomad
2 күн бұрын
japan need sub tree not USA
@winter2899
2 күн бұрын
Murdering that l3 at 8:48 cant be forgiven
@bigmack16
2 күн бұрын
Lets gooooo more nations
@upnightnick
2 күн бұрын
Welp, if they go through with this plan, Japan best fighter jet will be the F-2 ;-;
@mauswaffe
2 күн бұрын
ASEAN for China... Let's see if they change course or if War Thunder really is doomed
@BIASMANYT
13 сағат бұрын
8:40 Don't eat what you don't need
@Takeout419
2 күн бұрын
So excited for more countries🎉🎉🎉🎉
@petergray2712
2 күн бұрын
Singapore (short list) Leopard 2A4SG Hunter IFV M113 Ultra IFV Bionix II Wheeled IFV SSPH Primus SPH M113A2 Ultra Mechanized Igla SAM
@dy031101
2 күн бұрын
"Can we have Mirage 2000Ei?" "BuT yOU ALrEadY hAvE J-10~" "Argh...... then can we have proper F-16A-20?" "BuT yOU ALrEadY hAvE Singaporean F-16~" "WTF Gaijin?"
@brodiemetcalfe4727
2 күн бұрын
They should do a commonwealth sub tech tree for the British
@TheBigCheeeze
2 күн бұрын
If this is true then these additions would be awesome, But what about japan? What potential nation could go to Japan beside Thailand?
@Organic_Chemistry_Junkie
2 күн бұрын
If you ignore politics, South Korea would fit well w/ Japan to fill gaps. America does not need Korean stuff.
@AbsoluteZeroGravity
2 күн бұрын
I hope Indonesia and South Korea joining Japan tech tree with Thailand.
@asak_souteki
2 күн бұрын
It would be enough for Thailand to come to Japan.
@fiklego_pl
2 күн бұрын
IMHO south korea should go to japan and not US
@jjhalley8524
2 күн бұрын
South korea would straight up riot if put with japan
@lamoking647
2 күн бұрын
Never most southkorea tanks made by usa style not japan
@tenarmurk
2 күн бұрын
Agreed
@fiklego_pl
2 күн бұрын
@@lamoking647 they both worked with US and newest SK mbts look more like japaneese ones merged with french ones. Japaneese tree also needs more variety of tanks
@thechaozrevenger404
Күн бұрын
@@fiklego_pl So we should add random countries to Japan just because of the lack vehicles? Then i guess Iran can be Israel and Canada in Germany right.
@WildSTYLEracee
2 күн бұрын
I really hope they add Jordan to the British tree. I want a leclerc and challenger line up
@hadialdennawi8665
2 күн бұрын
You meant UAE 🇦🇪?? IT WILL GO TO FRANCE dude yo almost everything they got is French and some American
@RGM-0079
2 күн бұрын
Malaysia should be in Britain tech tree...or at least in Japan tech tree since it need more vehicles...China already got it cover...looks how abundant their vehicles is...
@kerotomas1
2 күн бұрын
Subtrees are way better than adding completely new nations because of the long and/or crazy expensive crew grinds. South Korea should have gone to Japan. They are closely related to eachother and are major allies. (Also the whole japanese tree is lackluster and with full of gaps unlike the US)
@MrGrim2u1987
2 күн бұрын
As for Africa, how many technical Toyota's can you have ? 50 cal version. Rpg version. Rf version.
@karasek2001
Күн бұрын
I really hate the idea of putting Czechoslovakia in a subtree, Czechia has so many unique (and also upgraded and domesticated) vehicles that it should be its own tree. But i guess thats too much work for Gaijin lol...
@IkarusGhostI
Күн бұрын
It would get absolutely destroyed by the other nations (Israel)
@strf90105
Күн бұрын
I have no qualms with South Korea in US, and since it's not Japan there won't be as big a complaint from Koreans, but I think another nation could really use Korean vehicles. The connection is roundabout, but hear me out. Korea in Italy. We know Italy Ground doesn't have many nessecary options to stay competitive. Even with Romania and Hungary, there's only so much they can add, and neither have reliable top tier missile systems. It's not completely unrelated either, because during US arms embargo on S.Korea, S.Korean order of German wheeled AFV's got blocked, but Italy worked very hard to illegally dodge the embargo and provide S.Korea with wheeled AFVs. Not just that, but Italian armor steel technology was the starting point and original basis for Korean domestic armor. Korea requested Italy send armor steel technology along with run flat tire technology to license build the CM6614 APC as the KM900, and Italy granted the request. Onto more gameplay purposes, Italy lacks real MBTs in terms of numbers (Ariete is a light tank pretending to be a MBT) and Missile SPAAs. Even if Romanian M1 Abrams and T-80 are added, they're not enough. K1 and K2 tanks would bolster the lineup nicely. Also, Romania and Hungary both lack modern SPAA SAM systems, relying on towed radar and physically separate missile systems. Korea has some vehicles that can fill the missile gap like the Biho II twin 30mm Oerlikon SPAA with 2 to 4 SAMs mounted on the turret with the guns. They also have the K-SAM Pegasus which is basically the Biho chassis with the ItO 90M turret with modified Crotale NG missiles which will probably be a copy of the Crotale already in game.
@redned7771
2 күн бұрын
been saying it for a while now have a stand alone Warsaw pact tech tree having that tree be the Polish tree is perfect. issue with the idea is Hungary is already in the Italian tree. I know TEC you do not like having too many independent trees but there comes another issue when a tech tree just never seems to end because of the number of vehicles it has. Russia is one of those tech trees. the fact Russia can make 5, 6 or even 7+ vehicle lineups pretty much at any BR it wants is a good sign to make a new nation. with all these research bonuses people will be more incentivised to play additional nations.
@spongegobler3449
2 күн бұрын
I never knew how small Switzerlands military is until i looked into what they use/used because of War Thunder. I honestly don’t think Switzerland is going to shake up Germany enough to make it more enjoyable to play… other than their f18’s. I did note that they have a pretty neat turretless Cold War tank, and a 2A4 with a very nice armor package, but that’s about it. No remarkable, SPAA, IFV, Light Tanks, or Heavy tanks.
@thom0243
2 күн бұрын
i just want to see australia or canada on UK
@Yugoslavz
Күн бұрын
I see in the comments a lot of people want Yugoslavia and it doesn’t make sense on how this leak is having Croatia and Slovenia in a “eastern euro” Tree with no Yugoslavia mentioned, Yugoslavia did have lend lease crafts but Yugoslavia and the successor states do have domestic designs from captured German to the hybrid Stuart tanks and even from the kingdom age, also for the rankV+ if you look up YugoImports they have tons of crazy designs you can see made mostly in Serbia, and the crazy car hybrids from the civil war like the zastava 750 with a m60 anti tank gun, don’t get me wrong I do believe Yugoslavia would need some help as a independent tree which is why I think Bulgaria can be a great sub-TT and for the 2 naval players, Yugoslavia had a decent navy from 1920 cruisers to Cold War missile boats like the Končar-class and much more including aircraft from Soko and ikarus making their own aircraft designs
@superbuster11
2 күн бұрын
I've lost my enthusiasm for Gaijin over the years, but if they introduce more Polish or Polish-used vehicles, planes, tanks, or ships, I'll be very happy 🙃 It doesn't matter if it's a separate tech tree or just a sub-tree.
@cynthiahatterene6739
2 күн бұрын
Definetly very interesting to hear. I was surprised tp hear south korea going to the us tree as i moreso expected it to go to japan to buff their tree. And usa being more likely to maybe get a latam subtree for all of the other south american and central american nations as well as mexico. I also hope that israel will become somewhat of an Middle eastern tree so they dont end up completely lacking and empty compared to Everything else as they REALLY need some more stuff. Maybe even add some lf the African vehicles to israel to fill theit tree up more. Australia and canada along with india can then easily fill out the british tree with their stuff, france can get more benelux stuff. And rather then getting a polish tree i think itd be smarter to just have the EU tree instead and then have all of the other EU nations within that. Rather then have poland+eastern europe and then another tree for the rest of europe. Like that wed really have the entire globe covered and every tree should have a decent amount of vehicles aviable to them. Either way im definetly looking forward to more trees/nations hopefully with good crew voices and according languages. And some unique fun vehicles too.
@SpeedyCM
2 күн бұрын
It is utterly weird to put ASEAN under China considering most of them are vehemently opposed to China and/or communism, especially the larger more militarily powerful ones.
@Miklos_Horthy4865
2 күн бұрын
Hearing Intermarium coming to the games makes my want to touch myself for the first time. Really I have gotten bored of all the nations and I really want another nation to the point that I don't care if it is all copy and paste
@nmcmm8341
2 күн бұрын
U talk but where is link? Who say this? Anybody talk on forum pages but where is leek? Pls next time add link
@covertmist0348
2 күн бұрын
Did they say anything about the Norwegian sub tree??
@BryanSalesDP
2 күн бұрын
It would make sense if (in case there will be) the Philippines would be a sub-tree for US.
@lancistyes
Күн бұрын
if all these tech trees are added i feel like the game would just be to big
@Chiga-lt6vq
2 күн бұрын
Even indian line in british tech tree is dont sane
@dadsoutdoors9247
2 күн бұрын
Lol I knew it was weird that they have the IRIAF f14 on america
@blackjack8697
Күн бұрын
I don't think Eastern Europe will be in Poland because with the amount of soviet equipment itd have to be a red for nation for simulator reasons or itd be a mess. And I think more people would be upset if Poland was labelled as a opfor nation than ex soviet countries being in ussr
@stinkymonke3622
2 күн бұрын
If they add poland i want them to add romania to it as an excuse for the gepard in the polish tech tree
@iYzn
2 күн бұрын
i will never understand why gaijin doesn't give love to ME countries like if we look at most of the upcoming aircrafts and tanks had a huge impact on the wars that happened during that time
@AbsoluteZeroGravity
2 күн бұрын
Of all other ASEAN nations beside Thailand. Singapore, Philippines and Indonesia should go to Japan sub tree.
@kakaprutt666
2 күн бұрын
I don't like the idea to have so many contries with China, not that it shouldn't have or that those countries shouldn't be in the game but i would have prefer more help for Japan. I may have put Pakistan, Vietnam, North Korea, Cambodia in the chinese tree but most of the other asian countries in the japanese tree. But let's see how it is in 2027 :o FInally Super happy for a central european tech tree, they deserved it.
@NotMyOriginalHandle
2 күн бұрын
How many times do we have to teach them this lesson. DON’T MESS WITH THE ECONOMY OF THE GAME. IT IS FINE THE WAY IT IS.
@the_defaultguy
2 күн бұрын
personally id like to see more "bits" of Philippine related stuff Planes? Tanks? boats/ships? even maps? id take it, AFAIK theres only 1 plane 1 skin 2 decal Philippine stuff in game putting them under China tho....yeah no oil and water situation
@cocoadesu2918
2 күн бұрын
this ^, it's a really bad move if they add it to China specially since the issue is still ongoing
@IANF126
2 күн бұрын
i think it would make more sense to make an "eastern european" tree and have poland as a sub tree but hey whatever
@tplays6688
2 күн бұрын
8:49 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO😭😱😢😨😰😥🫨💀
@angryskimaskman3332
2 күн бұрын
Rebranding USSR to "USSR" instead of Russia would be much better then making these mundane connections to eastern European nations I would think would make more sense and would be less confusing.
@kamilm6616
2 күн бұрын
We need poland 🇵🇱
@nikolaideianov5092
2 күн бұрын
Make east europe tech tree That way we also get some cursed balkan s***
@locke3437
2 күн бұрын
Love the ideea! I want to grind a new teck tree from the start, that was the most fun I had playing wt! Now I have no tecktree to start fresh on! Even better if they add Romania to it, I did not want romania to go as a sub tree to russia
@denislungu4985
2 күн бұрын
Romania should be a Germany subtree because they were close allies in WW2. Some russian ww2/cold war stuff would be nice for Germany and also Abrams, F16 and stuff. That would be perfect in my opinion !!!!!!
@ankurar6492
2 күн бұрын
8:13 what do you mean it’s literally called USSR for a reason Poland would only get Czech and Slovak Tanks
@1Reddd
Күн бұрын
They're going to nerf SL gains? Bro, it's hard enough already what are they doing?! Is there going to be some sort of equal trade off, maybe increase research points?
@papanate2141
2 күн бұрын
I mean i wouldnt be bothered if Gaijin added our BMP-23 to the soviet tech tree whether people shit their pants or not history is history you cant change it.
@crusadr1099
2 күн бұрын
as a greek, man i want my country in this game as a sub tech tree
@solreaver83
2 күн бұрын
Pretty sure I saw in a discord chat sm1n has denied this lists accuracy
@BlackWolf9988
2 күн бұрын
im not a fan of a eastern european faction atleast for sim. there is already soooooo many imposter vehicles for ground sim where you have to pay attention if the guy next to you is friendly or not all the time because people hide their decals with flags. just for reference, you have have a bunch of ww2 american vics in the italy tree + a BTR-80A. you have 3 different nations that have a T-72. you get a german BMP-1. a finish T-55 and T-54. a swedish T-80 a indian T-90 a M60 in the chinese tree. a israeli T-62. and many many more ground vics. there also is a ton of russian planes and helis in NATO trees aswell as china getting a lot of NATO planes and helis. it wouldnt be so bad if atleast stuff like eastern germany, hungary and taiwan could choose to fight on the other side to make it historical which it sadly isnt. i really hope gaijin starts caring about sim players.
Пікірлер: 366