Howard Stern: "What's the highest you've been paid for a movie?" Bradley Cooper: "5 Million, The Hangover Part 2" I'd have done it as well
@Onmysheet
11 жыл бұрын
Danny Dyer had a go at Frankie Boyle too and Danny got his arse handed to him once again. LOL
@WAAAAAAAAAAAY
12 жыл бұрын
"the plot [of Hangover 2] had none of the suspense of the first Hangover" genius :)
@importedmusic
13 жыл бұрын
The Hangover II was hideous....but I'm surprised that no one else picks up on the fact that the most depressing part of going to see these films in the cinema is that everyone else is seemingly having a good time.
@drexlspivey5828
6 жыл бұрын
importedmusic Pretentious person alert... Everyone else was enjoying themselves but I was sooooooo much more intelligent and above them...
@1SaG
3 жыл бұрын
To paraphrase Michael Caine on his involvement with Jaws 4: "Never seen it, but I'm told it's utter shit. OTOH, I've seen the house that it bought me, and it is splendid." So, yeah... don't feel sorry for people earning millions by appearing in shitty movies.
@sunside7
2 жыл бұрын
This!!
@jaycuthbert245
3 жыл бұрын
The emsil guy sounds like one of marks "b#m boys"
@KenFromBeara
13 жыл бұрын
@importedmusic True. Totally hideous. And unfunny! I trust Kermode's telling of this movie!
@chrissyroller
13 жыл бұрын
who is this guy?
@Howler15
13 жыл бұрын
@TheDanEllis dyer isnt exactly a great mate to have a pint with and maybe could not act anymore
@cfcolly
12 жыл бұрын
Yea but... the hangover 2 was hilarious...
@simonxag
7 жыл бұрын
Kermode's attacks on Dyer are nasty. As a big-name critic Kermode does have a position of power and no matter how little he likes Dyer's performance it doesn't justify picking on the guy for cheap bullying laughs. In this case he's actually encouraged a member of the public to insult the guy walking down the street. What must it be like for a non-public person (just an actor) to have strangers randomly abuse you? It's ironic that in the 2nd part of the clip Kermode jumps to the moral high ground to condemn genuine evils in big money cinema.
@benphillips8174
7 жыл бұрын
The difference is that Kermode makes fun of Dyer with a silly impression. Dyer's career is a total mess and has only been getting worse, and his public profile is just as bad (remember when he made a joke about slashing your wife's face open in a lad's mag?). Kermode does not have a position of power at all, since his listener base is far smaller than the audience of Danny Dyer's films (and, er, Eastenders) and most people who follow Kermode are intelligent enough to realise that anything he says about Dyer is a joke. As a film critic, the appropriate reaction to someone so ridiculous making so much money making such terrible films is ridicule. In contrast, Dyer has on more than one occasion threatened to physically attack Kermode. So, I think it's obvious where the moral high ground really lies. And how on earth are you coming to the conclusion that a famous actor is not a public person?
@simonxag
7 жыл бұрын
Kermode is not just "a film critic" he's THE "Mark Kermode" and has as much media presence and power as other UK critics put together. I'm not defending bad things Dyer may have done, but think of the activity that's reported (effectively celebrated and encouraged) in this piece.
@benphillips8174
7 жыл бұрын
That's true, but the fact remains that Danny Dyer is far, far more famous than Kermode (in the UK at least). No film critic is as well known by the general public as someone who's been all over our television screens for the last couple of decades. I doubt the venn diagram of Danny Dyer fans and Mark Kermode fans has a very large overlap either. What activity, taking the piss out of Danny Dyer? He's a big boy (supposedly), I'm sure he can handle it. Dyer makes lots of money essentially just playing himself. Making fun of him isn't bullying because it affects him in precisely no way except maybe to bruise his belligerent ego. He's a public figure who has been rather careless with his reputation, and should expect to receive a great deal of stick in return from the public and the media alike. Realistically, there isn't very much to say about Dyer's output. It's usually very basic and deeply flawed, so beyond 2 or 3 minutes of genuine criticism (Kermode did this for Vendetta more recently, where he did take some time to praise the film's cinematography) there is little left to say. Making fun of Dyer's awful delivery is a comic and entertaining way to criticise his awful films.
@robertmcelwaine7024
7 жыл бұрын
Well, put it this way, it's one thing to criticize someone's acting, it's quite another to get nasty about it. It's Kermode's job to be a critic, not an arsehole. Dyer Isn't the only one he's taken pot shots at both Anthony Hopkins and Gerard Butler. He dedicated one of his brief Kermode Uncut segments to ridiculing the latter of the two which was obnoxious. So say, what you like about Dyer but Kermode behaving like a 10 year old, point and laughing at people whether you agree with his opinion or not Isn't the sort of behaviour you should expect from a grown man.
Пікірлер: 20