If you're going to use text to speech then at least don't give it abbreviations.
@CliSwe
Жыл бұрын
You need to be precise - pedantic, actually - in the editing. Matilda I should read Matilda One.
@Liddy37
Жыл бұрын
Great subject, realshame about the automated speech skewing or making errors to a good text
@Baddad36
Жыл бұрын
Computer voices, don't you love them. Completely ruins what might have been an excellent video. I bailed after a minute or so.
@sirridesalot6652
Жыл бұрын
The Matilda II was NOT a development of the Matilda I just in case some here thought that it was. The wheels at 1:50 and 3:11 are those on a Valentine. The two biggest disadvantages of the Matilda II tanks were its slow speed and its small gun. It also lacked a high explosive shell most of the time and thus could not clear infantry or anti-tank emplacements. The small gun was a major handicap for many British tanks.
@howardchambers9679
Жыл бұрын
Small gun? It was a 40mm which at the time could penetrate ALL German armour in 1940. Admittedly the HE round wasn't issued to tank regiments but it was a weak round anyway. To put it in context, the best anti tank gun the Germans had was the 37mm. The Matilda mk II was impervious to it. Not only thick armour, but spaced at the front. The only round the Germans had that could penetrate it's armour was the 8cm flak.
@EllAntares
Жыл бұрын
@@howardchambers9679 about that time Germans moved to equip Type III with 5.5 cm KwK and contemplated 7.5 cm. And small caliber sabot while penetrating armor sometimes didn't do much else.
@ashleybishop9937
Жыл бұрын
Agree, pity about the robotech voice and abbreviatons"Rommel backlash es immaginative"! around the 7 minute mark. Pity also about the continued use of Valentine, Covenentor and A11 footage. Don't these people check the footage first. Sometimes you have to give up listening. Didn't mention the Russian use, even though they showed film of them....poor show.
@MichaelB4708
Жыл бұрын
The Robot voice sux for sure
@johnnyzippo7109
7 ай бұрын
Ughh the robo voice docs just do not cut it for me
@nigeldunkley2986
Жыл бұрын
The "Mark Eye"!?? Bloody autotext. It the Mark ONE not Mark Eye
@johncunningham6928
Жыл бұрын
I was waiting for the Mk Eye-Vee...!!
@grahamsouthamn9798
Жыл бұрын
You forgot that the Aussie sused the Matilda in New Guinea, gun versions and Flame thowers as shown by your photos. They lasted until the end of the Pacific war. I knew a man who was a driver in N.G. Bloody hot but the Japs couldn't strop them
@jtfoto1
Жыл бұрын
Your correct. My father was a gunner in Matilta's.
@Whippleofd
Жыл бұрын
Just read the dang thing yourself. What's the fascination with ai readers? These seem like great videos, but the computer reading makes me move on and not sub.
@pathowe4787
Жыл бұрын
Completely ruined by the robot voice over
@richardstone3473
Жыл бұрын
OK every technical statement required explanation. eg Double decker engine sharing same shaft? Whoa. Now I am typing this I am the one who needs to look up wikipedia
@Yukanhayt-Mhenow
Жыл бұрын
The 3 IN gun... The way it says "in" instead of inch hahaha dumb AI
@johnscallan5648
Жыл бұрын
you are correct.
@joeobyrne3189
2 ай бұрын
Mark eye, lol.
@sirridesalot6652
Жыл бұрын
What's with the descriptive blurb not being about the Matilda tank?
@BensWorkshop
Жыл бұрын
I think you would be better off doing your own voice over. Personally I find the accent and pronounciation a bit off putting, particularly say in for inches when it is written in text as in, and mark I instead of mark one.
@hawnyfox3411
Жыл бұрын
' ........."against the Panzer AIIIIE - AIIIIE - AIIIIE 'S' Or as you or I , we humans would say...... "Panzer Threes" Hahahhahaaaaa (Bloody Robots !_
@whitepanties2751
Жыл бұрын
Not helped by the robot voice, the many statistics hard to take in from the narration, would have helped to display them on screen.
@robinsteeden7466
Жыл бұрын
Wow the "Mark Eye" with a 1.85 "IN" gun. Teach your reader software how to read English abreviations or the community will never take you're videos seriously.
@billy54bob
Ай бұрын
Why show Aussie Matildas with no comment? Very devaluing of the whole post. Not to mention a captured Matillda (at least twice) flying the nazi flag.
@geroldwenisch8839
Жыл бұрын
Just food for the 8.8 cm Flak german gun. They were able to hit this tank - and the guys inside had no chance to fight back (because there is to much distance). A fact.......not an opinion.
@iangascoigne8231
Жыл бұрын
They were still good enough to see off any German tank of the time. A fact……not an opinion.
@Bluelamb03
Жыл бұрын
"The TOS-1A heavy flamethrower system is intended for direct fire support of advancing infantry ...." WTF???
@iamspartacus3114
Жыл бұрын
It never three tenned Germany.
@stephentraveler5291
Жыл бұрын
Just needed 105 howitzer! It could knock out Panzer from explosion alone and not need to penatrate armor .
@EllAntares
Жыл бұрын
You're describing the fictional "fatpard" VK 16.02 with 105 mm
@michaelpielorz9283
Жыл бұрын
That`s a good one (:-))
@richardstone3473
Жыл бұрын
I do know this. The mark 1 was called Matilda as it looked like a duck. it does
@SBKDisco
Жыл бұрын
The MK i? Its the Roman numeral I as in 1. AI Voice overs suck.
@travnickis1
Жыл бұрын
Computer Ai voice. Good Ai, but artificial.
@chrishutton1458
Жыл бұрын
You need a new script writer. This was a torture to listen to.
@tonyday7233
2 ай бұрын
Terrible commentary,
@nicklatheron8795
Жыл бұрын
Awful "speechelooooow" voice over
@tasjan9190
Жыл бұрын
Haha yeah right! Germany Panzers smoked those rust buckets.
@howardchambers9679
Жыл бұрын
Is that sarcasm? The 40mm on the Matilda II could penetrate all German tanks in 1940 whilst being impenetrable to their 37mm anti tank shells.
@tasjan9190
Жыл бұрын
@@howardchambers9679 Yeah right, the Matilda was already obsolete when it rolled its raggedy ass off the assembly line just like the Cromwell annnd Churchill was. BAHahahaha
@andylanigan3752
Жыл бұрын
@@tasjan9190 Get your history from Marvel comics? Better than your "Ronsons" in which caught fire when a German farted in their direction.And the Russians preferred the Matildas they got to the Sherman's. Jerk.
@howardchambers9679
Жыл бұрын
@@tasjan9190 it's so refreshing to find someone completely oblivious to the utter shite that falls out of their idiot mouths. I suppose you think the Tiger 1 was around in 1940? The only gun that could pen a Matilda II was the 88mm flak. That's an anti aircraft gun. It wasn't fitted to a tank. Instead of talking out of your fundament, go Google it.
@howardchambers9679
Жыл бұрын
@@tasjan9190 if possible could you insult me in a language I might Understand? Might I suggest English.
Пікірлер: 49