Coherent, sophisticated, nice, and optimistic? I like this guy.
@rgwak
6 жыл бұрын
More street, less tweets!
@blackout07blue
6 жыл бұрын
Lol. He's literally bought & owned by corrupting Big Money.
@Tan87ful
6 жыл бұрын
Agreed 💯💯👏🏽👏🏽
@stoka4049
3 жыл бұрын
Youre an idiot
@GingerGingie
6 жыл бұрын
"MORE STREETS! LESS TWEETS!" Preach!
@schoppepetzer9267
6 жыл бұрын
Isn‘t Skid Row in Los Angeles? Wouldn‘t that be something local politics should take care of?
@chibihime1000
6 жыл бұрын
Schoppe Petzer last year, we voted on increasing our sales tax to help fund an initiative to fix the housing crisis and make more areas available for the homeless. Temporary shelters and services as well as longer term housing. Problem is there’s a lot of NIMBY going on and it’s not easy to get a neighborhood to say yes to having those shelters in their area? But they’re trying. It’s still a long work in progress, but it’s definitely one of our largest issues
@schoppepetzer9267
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for providing some local insight
@dazzaspc
6 жыл бұрын
The homeless problem in this city is a blight and it's getting much worse, not better. the numbers are frightening. Throwing money and making it easier to be homeless isn't solving the problem. imagine that. The only reason the crime rates are going down here are the police have stopped reporting and stopping crime. Look it up. pretty big scandal this year. This mayor is a joke. Nice suit tho
@paddleduck5328
6 жыл бұрын
Not putting money into it certainly isn’t helping, and it’s not just LA. Orange County has been experiencing increasing homelessness. Everywhere, really.
@grahampcharles
6 жыл бұрын
Most cities have a skid row - it’s a generic term that derives from old logging camps. L.A. just happens to call their skid row by the name “Skid Row,” which dates back to an old (1950s? I think?) effort to clear it out.
@channelforpositivitylunder9385
6 жыл бұрын
I love California (as a Californian xD) (more specifically soCal) but please do something about the *101* and the *5* ASAP
@dazzaspc
6 жыл бұрын
It's every freeway here. How many plans have you had to change, how many events have you skipped because of the thought of traffic,? Even subconsciously, "I'd love to go to that dear friend's birthday party.....but its across the city,...never-mind", now multiply that by the millions that live here. But at least our taxes aren't the highest in the country right and they clean the trash and furniture and baby toys off the side of the highways?....oh.
@paddleduck5328
6 жыл бұрын
The 5 is not too bad, the 91 and 405 are good. The 710 and 110 though, ugh.
@pakalolo2936
6 жыл бұрын
Good luck. Leave California to really live.
@VanBurenOfficial
6 жыл бұрын
hey Garcetti, widen the 110 in downtown it's jammed every freaking second of every day
@chibihime1000
6 жыл бұрын
Bogmire777 while you’re at it, please add at least three more rows to the terrible 405
@fangorangutang
6 жыл бұрын
Freeways are not built or maintained by local government. That would something to take up with your reps at both the State and Federal levels. Think Caltrans and USDOT.
@ashmitanandy
6 жыл бұрын
This guy is politician *AND* a decent person? Whoa!
@blackout07blue
6 жыл бұрын
Lol. He's literally bought & owned by corrupting Big Money.
@Tan87ful
6 жыл бұрын
Exactly:) He seems great which is refreshing
@Marksmaniac5551
6 жыл бұрын
It is increasingly obvious (at least via certain social media discussion) that there are irreconcilable differences between fullthroated Democratic Party loyalists and faithless Democratic Party voters on a litany of policy postions as well as the regard of elected officials. One side has a notion that the other should effectively "fall in-line" and "stop being naive purists". The other believes that the party effectively acts like its "too big to fail" and that the party "needs to wholeheartedly represent the people and not be corrupt". In the court of law, irreconcilable differences are grounds for a divorce and I believe that is what the current division within the party merits. IMHO I feel that an effective way to do this is to take advantage of the unpopularity of DJT and the likely, yet not permanent, overthrow of the GOP in state legislatures, governors' mansions, Congress and the Oval Office between 2018 and 2020. Before power is likely obtained in these branches of government, a clear, executable plan needs to be agreed upon by all candidates and elected Dems in order to enact the divorce process. This can be done via Comprehensive Election Reform. This will include but may not be limited to anti-gerrymandering laws, anti voter suppression laws, voter empowerment actions (expanding election day, no excuse absentee/early voting, same day registration, mandatory-ish voting), open/hybrid state run primaries, campaign finance reform (public finance of elections, "get money out of politics") and electoral college review & reform. However most important to the divorce process, federal and state ranked choice voting need to be implemented. This will nullify the "spoiler effect" lamented by many of those against third-party voting. Furthermore, the Commission on Presidential Debates and other debate/town hall/forum regulating bodies must immediately allow at least Green Party and Libertarian Party candidates on the debate stage. Also, rules must be put into place that make getting onto the debate stage and ballot easier for all hard-working candidates. In order to receive the immediate party unity that apparently held in such high esteem, it is strongly encouraged that all candidates and elected Dems agree to this Comprehensive Election Reform Pact. Failure to agree could result in consequences (for Dem party) similar to the elections between 2010 and 2016 on all levels of government. Since nothing in this reform is abhorrently objectionable in nature, it should behoove wholesale, fullthroated agreement. Once in power (respectively for each level of government), this Comprehensive Election Reform agenda must be signed into law and executed upon within the first 100 days in power for that branch of government. YJKLJLNASD F E W FASDFWEDF
@Marksmaniac5551
6 жыл бұрын
It is increasingly obvious (at least via certain social media discussion) that there are irreconcilable differences between fullthroated Democratic Party loyalists and faithless Democratic Party voters on a litany of policy postions as well as the regard of elected officials. One side has a notion that the other should effectively "fall in-line" and "stop being naive purists". The other believes that the party effectively acts like its "too big to fail" and that the party "needs to wholeheartedly represent the people and not be corrupt". In the court of law, irreconcilable differences are grounds for a divorce and I believe that is what the current division within the party merits. IMHO I feel that an effective way to do this is to take advantage of the unpopularity of DJT and the likely, yet not permanent, overthrow of the GOP in state legislatures, governors' mansions, Congress and the Oval Office between 2018 and 2020. Before power is likely obtained in these branches of government, a clear, executable plan needs to be agreed upon by all candidates and elected Dems in order to enact the divorce process. This can be done via Comprehensive Election Reform. This will include but may not be limited to anti-gerrymandering laws, anti voter suppression laws, voter empowerment actions (expanding election day, no excuse absentee/early voting, same day registration, mandatory-ish voting), open/hybrid state run primaries, campaign finance reform (public finance of elections, "get money out of politics") and electoral college review & reform. However most important to the divorce process, federal and state ranked choice voting need to be implemented. This will nullify the "spoiler effect" lamented by many of those against third-party voting. Furthermore, the Commission on Presidential Debates and other debate/town hall/forum regulating bodies must immediately allow at least Green Party and Libertarian Party candidates on the debate stage. Also, rules must be put into place that make getting onto the debate stage and ballot easier for all hard-working candidates. In order to receive the immediate party unity that apparently held in such high esteem, it is strongly encouraged that all candidates and elected Dems agree to this Comprehensive Election Reform Pact. Failure to agree could result in consequences (for Dem party) similar to the elections between 2010 and 2016 on all levels of government. Since nothing in this reform is abhorrently objectionable in nature, it should behoove wholesale, fullthroated agreement. Once in power (respectively for each level of government), this Comprehensive Election Reform agenda must be signed into law and executed upon within the first 100 days in power for that branch of government. AUSDFUEF W DF ADF AS DFKDFD
@diegoolivares7156
6 жыл бұрын
seth is the man
@MaxBorker
6 жыл бұрын
I had to do a presentation for an econ class last semester where I looked into the consequences of hosting the Olympics, and LA is the only place to have made a net profit on hosting the games, both times they've hosted. It's a very important asset for bidding cities to have the infrastructure already built out, or else they've got a money pit on their hands.
@rgwak
6 жыл бұрын
You know who else is having trouble on the dating scene? T'rump...Ivanka just keeps turning him down. Sad!
@Tan87ful
6 жыл бұрын
Ro G 😂😂
@frankgonzalez2269
6 жыл бұрын
FIX THE DAMM ROADS, AND STOP WASTING OUR TAX MONEY .
@stoka4049
3 жыл бұрын
Yep. Pigs!!!
@subhajitdeysarkar9724
6 жыл бұрын
Where is the monologue?
@oiat
6 жыл бұрын
Cool guy.
@blackout07blue
6 жыл бұрын
and Owned by corrupting Big Money. Yay!
@Pontius888
6 жыл бұрын
I met him last year, very respectful and thoughtful guy.
@dazzaspc
6 жыл бұрын
Now if only he was a competent mayor....
@TheDeLeonGarageCollection
4 жыл бұрын
OK let’s take score Los Angeles: Worst school district in the State Worst traffic in the country Biggest poverty level in the country Most homelessness in the country Highest rents and housing in the country. So what was he saying about taking action? Nice guy but completely ineffective
@ethanhughes2943
4 жыл бұрын
Terrible mayor... this is proving to be true with every day passing...
@JorgeRuiz-xk7br
6 жыл бұрын
I can see him being president
@briankoski2532
6 жыл бұрын
Yep. Keep the faith... In time Trump will be haggling with inmates over commissary.
@dazzaspc
6 жыл бұрын
You're right. It does seem like some kind of religion at this point. I mean, cause there's no evidence. lol. But your right, Russian Bots and Facebook adds... Lets just wait for those charges from Muller, sure theyll be coming any day now,.....I mean its been on the news every single day for a whole year now! any day now .....that and Jesus coming back. lol
@ginathornburg6194
6 жыл бұрын
Seth got something wrong. Mayor Garcetti is gone 2/3 of the time courting support out of state for his 2020 presidential run. I think Mr. Garcetti does seem like a very sincere guy, but homelessness has exploded on his watch, while developers have been having a field day.
@JAWS8000
4 жыл бұрын
I respect this guy 💯
@stoka4049
3 жыл бұрын
Youre a nazi
@molly-gh4we
6 жыл бұрын
Great mayor!
@ethanhughes2943
4 жыл бұрын
this didnt age well lol
@carstereobandits
6 жыл бұрын
Garcetti, single-payer healthcare or GTFO2020
@paddleduck5328
6 жыл бұрын
Yes, support progressive candidates and issues!
@Marksmaniac5551
6 жыл бұрын
It is increasingly obvious (at least via certain social media discussion) that there are irreconcilable differences between fullthroated Democratic Party loyalists and faithless Democratic Party voters on a litany of policy postions as well as the regard of elected officials. One side has a notion that the other should effectively "fall in-line" and "stop being naive purists". The other believes that the party effectively acts like its "too big to fail" and that the party "needs to wholeheartedly represent the people and not be corrupt". In the court of law, irreconcilable differences are grounds for a divorce and I believe that is what the current division within the party merits. IMHO I feel that an effective way to do this is to take advantage of the unpopularity of DJT and the likely, yet not permanent, overthrow of the GOP in state legislatures, governors' mansions, Congress and the Oval Office between 2018 and 2020. Before power is likely obtained in these branches of government, a clear, executable plan needs to be agreed upon by all candidates and elected Dems in order to enact the divorce process. This can be done via Comprehensive Election Reform. This will include but may not be limited to anti-gerrymandering laws, anti voter suppression laws, voter empowerment actions (expanding election day, no excuse absentee/early voting, same day registration, mandatory-ish voting), open/hybrid state run primaries, campaign finance reform (public finance of elections, "get money out of politics") and electoral college review & reform. However most important to the divorce process, federal and state ranked choice voting need to be implemented. This will nullify the "spoiler effect" lamented by many of those against third-party voting. Furthermore, the Commission on Presidential Debates and other debate/town hall/forum regulating bodies must immediately allow at least Green Party and Libertarian Party candidates on the debate stage. Also, rules must be put into place that make getting onto the debate stage and ballot easier for all hard-working candidates. In order to receive the immediate party unity that apparently held in such high esteem, it is strongly encouraged that all candidates and elected Dems agree to this Comprehensive Election Reform Pact. Failure to agree could result in consequences (for Dem party) similar to the elections between 2010 and 2016 on all levels of government. Since nothing in this reform is abhorrently objectionable in nature, it should behoove wholesale, fullthroated agreement. Once in power (respectively for each level of government), this Comprehensive Election Reform agenda must be signed into law and executed upon within the first 100 days in power for that branch of government. SDF FFFFFFFFFFFFWWWWW W W W
@NewMessage
6 жыл бұрын
I would certainly be nice to see a generation who pays attention to the world, to counter the last one who only pay attention to their phones. Wait.. gotta take this.
@tiawilliams5690
6 жыл бұрын
New Message So you haven’t been paying attention the last few weeks, have you?
@veemacks7255
6 жыл бұрын
"I would certainly be nice" Just how nice would you be?
@NewMessage
6 жыл бұрын
attacking obvious typos/auto-correct errors is considered the lowest form of trolling. Try harder.
@canislupusfool
6 жыл бұрын
The worst generation is the baby boomers. Also, correcting grammar and spelling mistakes isn't trolling.
@bonesonstones1
6 жыл бұрын
How about this: we stop bickering about entire generations being the sole source of this political climate, acknowledge that society will always change with every new generation to come and as with everything, that change can be ambiguous in valence. You people sound like kindergardeners arguing who has the nicer lunchbox.
@thelastofthelemmings6279
6 жыл бұрын
The Olympics destroys everything it touches..
@eddybala5837
4 жыл бұрын
Hes not italian tho nor does he provide good paying jobs to locals😂😂
@msfair3625
6 жыл бұрын
Omg I thought that was Lewandowski on the thumbnail.
Пікірлер: 86