This was exactly the sort of unbiased analysis I was looking for. Very clearly explained. Thank you. I will now move ahead with MBTI as part of an intra company communication project with confidence that it is an appropriate tool for that particular job.
@cassianpicaro
4 жыл бұрын
I have been binge watching your videos this evening. Got recommended your D&D MBTI video and i really love it. You explain stuff really well by pointing out the answer and explaining the necessary points instead of going round around in circle like other youtubers who just want more watchtime. Props from an INTJ girl
@AsuraPsych
4 жыл бұрын
Appreciate your words. I do my best to put out meaningful content and over the past few months I've been putting a lot of effort into this channel. Thanks for watching!
The big five is measuring a 3D object with a 2D ruler. From the two farthest points on the surface it can see. It spits out true information about a person but MBTI had already gone further than that. Though we may need Big 5 if we only want certain infor mations about a person or if seeing certain trends in graphs would help something, it will still end up in inaccurate 'qualitative judgement' about people's behavior. Because you can't put people in a spectrum and expect nothing deeper lies in the reason people tend to have similar personalities. MBTI doesn't care about the similarity they are showing outwards, its what order the brain is most comfortable using if there is a given set of functions(and the order is unchangable). Use Big 5 and list the results together with your height, weight, skin color, etc.
@StarkMagnus
6 жыл бұрын
Best explanation of big 5 I've seen, I finally understand it now, thanks.
@raposojogadorgf8761
2 ай бұрын
Finally did a Big Five Test, for an INFP like me the results were quite broad and shallow. I already knew all of that about myself. MBTI on the other hand helped me find out my cognitive function stack which is Fi-Ne-Si-Te. Cognitive functions reveal much more about one's thought process and what they priorize.
@anneh851
2 жыл бұрын
I've taken the MBTI many times, always scored the same (INTJ) and it fits very well. Then I took the Big 5 and it was waaaaay off. Said I was 100% extravert. Anyone who knows me knows that simply is not true. :)
@kyleking8741
4 жыл бұрын
Use big 5 for business use mbti for personal
@jasonjase8661
3 жыл бұрын
Mbti and enneagram are the best
@jayrisinger387
4 жыл бұрын
The big 5 makes assumptions about my traits that are, frankly, dead wrong. I'm very introverted, but I am not shy, bashful, or submissive as the big 5 would lead one to believe. In this model extroversion is seen as a positive trait and introversion a negative trait. Just because I am an introvert doesn't mean I am a recluse who doesn't like people or leaving my home, in fact I am very outgoing and I am very sociable. I just like to think before I talk: I like to work out an idea in my own head before I present my truth, unlike an extrovert who likes to talk as they think and show everyone how their minds work.
@xandercorp6175
3 жыл бұрын
It sounds like you are struggling against your personal understanding of the terms and not the OCEAN framework per se.
@twistedsunshine3276
4 жыл бұрын
As an intuitive person, I don't trust the one who made big 5 lol. I am still biased to Mbti since i can relate to it more. The big 5 is like a small part of mbti. Each of the personalities had their certain big 5 qualities in some way.
@Lazulii33
2 жыл бұрын
They’re largely unrelated, mbti is inherent, the big five can change.
@lukeholyland8302
4 жыл бұрын
I personally quite like the Big 5, it's goal isn't to make you feel good about yourself, tell you what it thinks you'll be good at and give you a pretty label along with how common/rare the personality type is. The big 5 is impartial and factual (so long as you answer honestly), its goal isn't to tell you what you are, but show you why you are, and trusts you're intelligent enough to see how each trait interacts with one another to craft you, and thus infer what your flaws and strengths may be. Plus it's inevitable, in that the Big 5 will always occur when data is factor analysed, always, same as when testing intelligence, IQ will always come out as the only factor, these 2 systems exist as a result of the data; the big 5 just is, its impartial whereas MBTI exists only for a label. Also the Big 5 is pretty easy to understand, I personally find it difficult to remember 16 4 letter acronyms, each with variation, and recall the meaning of each letter. Also it's just more specific, big 5 is 5 factors, whereas MBTI is 4 very, very vague factors. Really I am quite surprised MBTI is taken the least bit serious anymore, or used at all in any business sectors.
@ianr1557
4 жыл бұрын
This...especially the first sentence
@anonnymus1227
4 жыл бұрын
I agree. The purpose of the big 5 is to know which areas are your strengths and weaknesses. The MBTI focuses too much on archetypes, specially on first impression since their tests are more on letter dichotomy and behaviorism. If ppl didn't like their big 5 results then they completely miss the point of personal development. Lol. Mbti makes you feel good abt yourself.
@Ignasimp
3 жыл бұрын
@@anonnymus1227 Disagree. The Big 5 uses some traits as being better than others, and this is dead wrong. It also says the opposit trait is a lack of that trait instead of a different end of the spectrum. Extroversion, conscienciousness, agreeableness, opennes to experience; are all xonsidered better than their opposites, which are considered a lack of that trait, which is not true. It creates a judgement when It's supposed to be objective. The only one considered negative to have is neuroticism.
@xandercorp6175
3 жыл бұрын
@@Ignasimp It's almost like objective reality is not neutral, and the kind of person you are dictates what you can do and how you can do it.
@kimberlyl3727
Жыл бұрын
MBTI isnt limited to 4 factors, your MBTI type is determined by 8 different cognitive functions, and each function manifests differently in different people based on the order they're placed in. The functions are also not vague once you start to research and understand them. Its also pretty interesting to learn how functions work together.
@jarrodyuki7081
Жыл бұрын
you need both!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@calistamuskitta797
5 жыл бұрын
This was really helpful. Thanks!
@david_oliveira71
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that/those great clarifications!
@leannehinton151
Жыл бұрын
it all becomes clear as day!!!! thanks so much
@meghaig7915
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate you and the content you share
@Gunrun808
4 жыл бұрын
Scoring 0% on neuroticism made me have a few more positive thoughts.
@alexyodson5749
4 жыл бұрын
I scored a 98... Which I completely understand
@imelitist2828
4 жыл бұрын
71%
@faz1232
2 жыл бұрын
Wow! I scored 90%
@goca710
2 жыл бұрын
100% 💀💀💀
@iansantiago6526
4 жыл бұрын
Really good video,man
@rowannieuport3942
4 жыл бұрын
Extremely useful--thank you very much!
@NikkiJohnsonFreeThinker
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video - super-helpful in a number of respects! One question: Could you clarify a bit more why the MBTI percentages for each preference pair do not reflect the degree to which particular traits are actually exhibited by subjects? Is it something about the way the questions are respectively structured? Thanks so much!
@Karatop420
5 жыл бұрын
The main drawback to the big five is that the average business manager will test...dundunduunnn... AVERAGE!!! ...BUT, the average manager will test a certain mbti type and feel special. I mean, come on, the guy in charge MUST get a result that proves his specialness, not the cold reality of him being "average," which is what most will test on the big 5. Think about it. The bane of the average supervisor is a test that works. They find more use from something that encourages.
@caine7024
5 жыл бұрын
very interesting
@attackinglife3442
4 жыл бұрын
I am not sure, because MBTI maybe will make them feel better in showing what they are good at, but not necessarily pointing out the bad habits. In my understanding for the majority of people the big five will still show that the trait that is the most dominent in their field will be higher. As exemple, the manager will still have a higher score in conscientiousness then the average employe in MBTI.
@Ignasimp
3 жыл бұрын
MBTI also shows the disadvantages.
@JohnSmith-ox3gy
3 жыл бұрын
I would imagine being average is what you want in an average business manager, can communicate with the majority and people have the most experience dealing with that type.
@xandercorp6175
3 жыл бұрын
This is business politics with regards to personality metrics in a nutshell. It's the reason so much mainstream business psychometrics is so fluffy and vacuous. There's nothing more anathema to an establishment (that claims to be merit-based but is actually political) than personality tests that work and make no bones about what traits they are measuring.
@MathewKenyi18
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this information.
@CharlesLeGoff
5 жыл бұрын
very clear, thanks
@blainefiasco8225
3 жыл бұрын
*blows internet kiss* thank you so much. Qualitative vs quantitative explained it perfectly for me. MBTI is Qualitative, but that's ok with me. I hate numbers anyway
@2muchtalk173
2 жыл бұрын
Good job, thanks
@sailaway8244
2 жыл бұрын
Why is neuroticism considered a negative trait when it more likely to be a survival mechanism? 👉💉being a topical issuel🤔
@stuffasvines2865
7 ай бұрын
I’m confused. I thought you were suppose to use the cognitive functions to determine your mbti type.
@donwald3436
Жыл бұрын
ERMERGERD the man's name was hyphenated first that's saxist lol.
@jarrodyuki7081
Жыл бұрын
if i score bad on the big 5 my father shouldnt judge me hes an infj.
@noor8463
4 жыл бұрын
Well my results on both align perfectly lol
@Anonymous_Anon882
Жыл бұрын
I don’t mind the big-five (and neuroticism, by the way, isn’t such a bad trait) and its definition of introversion but people who hang up on that alone in 2023 and keep banging on about how it’s possible to be a self-confident so-and-so who talks to new people with ease as an introvert irritate me. There’s too much to it to openly condense it to something very specific and social which doesn’t really say anything about the person’s personality and I just think people should be past that one-sidedness to some extent. Misusing the word “introvert” based off the big 5 (which is already a limiting framework in itself) and over-conflating it with social anxiety doesn’t help. Big five has its purpose and relevance but it shouldn’t be glorified and should just be taken for what it is (nothing more) and that goes for all five dimensions. They paint a picture but they don’t tell a story.
@infj-tguy6275
2 жыл бұрын
Ok so I'm not takin the big 5 test because I don't care about if I'm 56% introverted or whatever, I'm an infj-t and that's the end
@reneeharold7358
2 жыл бұрын
In a non egalitarian country both men and women score high in neuroticsim because both men and women are oppressed. In an egalitarian society men are lower in neuroticism and women have the same level of neuroticism as in non egalitarian country. That's because it's mainly women who are oppressed in egalitarian countries. It doesn't sound that egalitarian to me.
@jvc8947
5 жыл бұрын
I’m so open to recognize my neurotic agreeableness-you would know this except for my introvertedness. I’m open to explanation. 😂. I don’t even get consciousness... that’s just not a real thing.
@blainefiasco8225
3 жыл бұрын
My thing about the big 5 is that it's just a bunch of adjectives and most of them at least at face value sound like something you want to have high scores in. I don't find it as comprehensive as MBTI.
@Lazulii33
2 жыл бұрын
Besides arguably openness neither high nor low traits are a good thing in the test. You can like mbti without having to say big 5 isn’t good.
@blainefiasco8225
2 жыл бұрын
@@Lazulii33 Wouldn't having all but neuroticism be good to be high in?
@Lazulii33
2 жыл бұрын
@@blainefiasco8225 neuroticism isn’t always bad, most of history’s greatest minds had it, as you cant innovate if you’re not unhappy with something. So having low neuroticism just leaves you complacent. However that doesn’t mean everyone should want it either, everything comes with pros and cons. Low conscientiousness just means you’re adaptable and less rigid than people who are high in it. But again isnt better than having high conscientiousness. I dont really see how being an extrovert is better than an extrovert to be honest. Introverts tend to be more original, and have more time to work on hobbies and projects, again it doesnt mean being an extrovert is worse either. Individuals low in agreeableness tend to make good lawyers and scientists, as it means you’re less likely to accept things at face value. Im not gonna say the other option isnt worse either this time, Im sure you get the point.
@blainefiasco8225
2 жыл бұрын
@@Lazulii33 ok, when you put it that way it makes sense. Thought the pro of neuroticism sounds a little contrived, but I do see what you mean. I never thought of it that way thank you. I guess I was taking the big river a little personal because I'm a high neurotic.
Пікірлер: 59