It’s so stealthy, in fact, that no one will ever see one in the air.
@funnycomplications4582
Жыл бұрын
funny
@chiefkeefgaming2005
Жыл бұрын
Noone will see it at air bases either
@typie34
Жыл бұрын
Iranian military guy on TV "BUT BUT its there, you just cant see it thats how good it is DEATH TO AMERICA!"
@bidarvandi
Жыл бұрын
just like alasad trump of headace nothing else
@renthokstu
Жыл бұрын
Just like they said Iran cant make drones?😚
@reggieziet
Жыл бұрын
You know whats most impressive about this video? That they made a CGI model where a pilot actually fits in the cockpit, unlike the "real" life version of this Iranian jet
@miklosernoehazy8678
Жыл бұрын
...the small size of the cockpit makes me think this thing is actually a suicide bomber, manned by a child soldier... ...a stealthy "Martyr's Bomber" carrying a couple of suitcase nukes...
@amiranisi6490
Жыл бұрын
Just like the drones it used :)
@cemo3292
Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@spartanonxy
Жыл бұрын
@@miklosernoehazy8678 Well thank you for that lovely image. I was worried I would sleep soundly tonight...... But yeah I really would not put it passed the Iranian government.
@iraniankiddo5535
Жыл бұрын
Sure but those Iranian Drones that blew up Himars in Ukraine were CGI too ? 😂
@alifehresti9982
Жыл бұрын
Long live Iran .the only 1 unique country which faced heavy western sanctions for almost 50 years and still is building new military technology and rising gradually! Iran 🇮🇷🇮🇷
@drpk6514
9 ай бұрын
Manual control is an advantage since it is immune from electronic jamming. This fighter actually looks perfect for dog fights which is needed for defending a land rather than attacking as does the US. I remember the time people saying Iranian ballistic missiles were Photoshop.... Now Iran has one of the most diverse and biggest arsenals in the world. Same as the Iranian drone inventory.
@fluxacadmey5836
8 ай бұрын
Absolutely finally and unbiased comment
@talknstang400
7 ай бұрын
And Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world lol
@dancingkitty11
7 ай бұрын
The Iranians have cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs.
@AIMI4U
5 ай бұрын
From the days of F-16, planes become impossible to control by a human anymore, since you need surgically accurate inputs to get things done.
@rezah336
5 ай бұрын
@@AIMI4U f16 is designed to be unstable by choice
@gingecate
Жыл бұрын
Tbh as an aircraft designer the intakes on the top with no s ducts is not a huge issue. They will be mainly shielded by ground radar, the more concerning issue would be boundary layer ingestion into the engine. Considering this is an issue that still plagues nations with far bigger budgets I would have to pull the bs card on this design.
@Mad_gamers323
Жыл бұрын
another thing i think is angle of attack the engines will bo stalled
@kodiak64
Жыл бұрын
The plane must have literally no high alpha qualities other than dropping like a stone. That's speaking as an aero engineer (qualified as one, not working as one!) Overall, it's not a serious project and seems to be designed for its own domestic audience to feel proud about. What else could it be?
@hellothere1656
Жыл бұрын
Something tells me the intakes look like that because it might not be a supersonic jet. The engines may still be the Iranian Owj turbojet with afterburners but just like the mig17, those afterburners are just there for some extra thrust for better payload capacity for take-off and climb rate. Not really for sustained supersonic flight.
@ChrisDavis333
Жыл бұрын
Where can we check out your work? Or should I pull the BS card on you?
@carnifexor3010
Жыл бұрын
Much like the rivet problem of the SU-57.....
@fridaycaliforniaa236
Жыл бұрын
This tiny thingy looks more like a drone where someone decided to put a pilot inside.
@jaanikaapa6925
Жыл бұрын
It is that. Just a mock-up using the drone they were able to steal.
@vindictivegrind9370
Жыл бұрын
@@jaanikaapa6925 Naw, they just built it based on a model they found from SketchUp
@alisamadi1892
Жыл бұрын
It looks like a finch
@waitingforanalibi2224
Жыл бұрын
Is the more likely scenario! Trying to build an air industry around a sole crashed U.S drone tech perhaps?
@fridaycaliforniaa236
Жыл бұрын
@@jaanikaapa6925 Yup :)
@JoshuaC923
Жыл бұрын
We might laugh at them, but i will give their engineers and mechanics props for keeping the oldies flying till now
@amazingmonkey886
11 ай бұрын
Sure I give props to Cuba's mechanics for keeping their cars going but that is mostly a testament to American car quality in the 60's. And I still wouldn't bet that Cuba can make a F1 car.
@hhaaddiizzffaarr
3 ай бұрын
@@amazingmonkey886 Car and Jet technology have very different developments. A car from today will be in almost every way better than the ones from the 60s. An F35 and an F14, not so much- in fact, there are things that the F14 does much better than the F35 like speed and maneuverability. Even in terms of stealth, the US developed more stealthy jets in the 80s. Rocket, space, and aircraft engineering have not changed much since the 1950s when you compare it to automobile engineering. In 1969 the US landed on the moon, how much has the US space program developed since then?
@Nightmare-dd4bp
3 ай бұрын
you can't say that when you vote for Biden 😂
@Rich.xavier
6 ай бұрын
As a iranian I have to say Bro that fighter jet was a lie😂 Our government always talks about building fantastic military stuff but 90% of them was lie
@sheikhsaju-bw6nm
6 ай бұрын
Telling me without tell YOUR jew From Iran 😂😂😂
@alihanaydogdu6158
6 ай бұрын
You are the only intelligent iranian 😂
@Amen6magi
Күн бұрын
When they take rq170 you say same think but even dont know whwere is it for 6 months until iran self telling your😂s@alihanaydogdu6158
@e.sstudios1015
Жыл бұрын
It's a very stealthy aircraft, because it will stay on the runway doing taxi tests all day long!
@jaanikaapa6925
Жыл бұрын
Not even that. It just is there. Made of cardboard.
@bobman36
Жыл бұрын
People are so mean to non superpower countries
@DanielMasmanian
Жыл бұрын
@@bobman36 bear in mind, this machine is designed to kill people, too
@KingTFD
Жыл бұрын
@@bobman36 just be a superpower, stoopid
@hcardoso
Жыл бұрын
As their kamikaze drones?😜
@IAmTheAce5
Жыл бұрын
_'we don't need fly-by-wire'_ So, you don't _have_ fly-by-wire? ...
@bandvitromania9642
Жыл бұрын
Yup most probably because they can't source one i think
@JakubKas
Жыл бұрын
The Russian method: "It's not a bug, it's a feature! "
@RonJeremy514
Жыл бұрын
"Hey, why would you pull wires instead of using a stick and a hotas like everyone to pilot this thing anyway?"
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
pretty hard to make one out of cardboard and Fiver 3D models.
@Amen-Magi
4 ай бұрын
What america x36 do😂
@Soap_MikeTavish
Жыл бұрын
The advantage of losing a fly-by-wire system is that in the event of an EMP, whether generated from a nuclear detonation or otherwise, means that the pilot could keep flying whereas the control might be knocked out for other pilots depending on the protection of their aircraft!
@zoranhome
Жыл бұрын
...still there are at least 200 orher vital systems in that jet that are very susceptible to EMP.
@o-wolf
Жыл бұрын
Don't make comments with common sense &impartial logic.. it's not allowed around here
@Power5
Жыл бұрын
Not keep flying, but able to perform a controlled glide to the ground instead of uncontrolled tumbling out of the sky. Every other computer controlled system in the plane would be knocked out, but at least the stick will still move the control surfaces.
@ConsciousnessAndScience
Жыл бұрын
This was my idea as well. Makes total sense.
@ivanganic3984
3 ай бұрын
Today people Jam UAV controls and signals, make drons to land untouched, tomorow maybe planes fly by wire...who knows.
@Arty_McParty
8 ай бұрын
(Compare this with Automatic stick shift and Manual) 1-Anti EMP...(That means when EMP strikes, you can control your plane) 2-Cheaper to make , electronics are more expansive to make.
@Ryan_Winter
5 ай бұрын
This was also my guess. Electronic warfare could be an issue for a fly-by-wire system. If it's "old-school" it's immune to that sort of attack.
@Arty_McParty
5 ай бұрын
Exactly! EMP won't work on some of the planes making your tank , car , fully Electronic is kind of bad.. maybe a hybrid.. because EMP will take you out in a heart beat... hell even solar storm can devistate the society if unprepared.! @@Ryan_Winter If youre jet well equepped to reflect solar storm you will withstand some of emp but that's expansive! and idk if you can actually install it on your plane
@lightspeedvictory
Жыл бұрын
Here’s the thing: if they go even further into the anhedral design, specifically making the wings hull wings, they’ll get a few advantages. Of those that I can remember off the top of my head: a) the ability to shield underwing external stores from radar and b) by using gull wings in conjunction with all-moving wing tips, one can eliminate the need for the vertical tail and rudders. Furthermore, all-moving wing tips can ease design complexity and reduce maintenance costs by moving all wing surface controls to the wingtips, which also has the added benefit of increased roll performance. In terms of the air intakes, they could theoretically could’ve put radar baffles in the air intakes and we just can’t see them, but this is just me spitballing at this point Requesting videos on the following: -switchblade aircraft designs such as the FA-37 Talon from the ‘05 movie “Stealth” or the X-02 Wyvern from the Ace Combat franchise -Super Tomcat-21 and ASF-14 -the NATF program as a whole -early ATF proposals -Sea Apache -F-20 Tigershark -Bae SABA -Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Bomber proposal
@polduseri909
Жыл бұрын
Don’t forget that Iran lost one F-14 in the hands of Tom Cruise 😂😂
@PeterMuskrat6968
Жыл бұрын
Mf just strolled up and was like “Hey who left the keys in here”
@PetesGuide
Жыл бұрын
And the rest were taken out by cruise missiles!
@vindictivegrind9370
Жыл бұрын
I like how the Iranian airbase guards are so stupid they didn't think Maverick and Rooster were sus running around the tarmac in obvious American gear.
@PetesGuide
Жыл бұрын
@@vindictivegrind9370 maybe not-I was thinking about this, and part of their MO is to copy us Americans, so perhaps their flight suits are similar and they color their helmets to look cool.
@JGL841
Жыл бұрын
In American propaganda movies, the enemy is always an idiot and the keys are always in the ignition.
@armanmotamedi9156
Жыл бұрын
This is a UCAV the pilot is there for the proof of concept and development. The camera pod is a test equipment used for flight test and development. Fo rthe serial production you can be sure it will be removed. The UCAV is a top hemisphere stealthy. It will be used to approach AWACS and fire a missile. It will fly in formation with F5s in an air to ground role. There is a posiibility that it will be able to take off from the lakes rivers etc in case the runways are destroyed by the enemy. Thus the intakes are where they are, over the wing. In that case the wing tips can be used for steering in the water. Since it will be used for ground attack it has to have combat survivability against shoulder fire missiles and AAA -at low level flight nothing is stealthy - so fly by wire is not an option. The intake are shielded by the wings against ground radar. The original version probably served as a glider for the proof of concept.
@hatefeulblast
10 ай бұрын
Your answer about all manual control: extreme sanction levels cause the high shortage in any kind of hightech gadgets.
@theemperorprime2406
Жыл бұрын
It honestly looks like the Sukhoi Su47 (the plane with backward wings) except they made the wings normal
@Humbulla93
Жыл бұрын
the SU47 had forward swept wings
@yoamal1187
Жыл бұрын
only similar thing is the color
@fanaticaudienc8089
Жыл бұрын
I'm Iranian. This thing is just a hoax. All of the budget is directed toward missiles and drones. Including stealth drones. And So far is working. I mean HIMARS is like our fateh missile and the drones are just ours!!! So... I can't fault them for not focusing on manned jets
@vindictivegrind9370
Жыл бұрын
@Toni Dinh I can't wait to see it in the rain
@Clonefiles
Жыл бұрын
Itu bukani Sukhoi Su47
@RageDavis
Жыл бұрын
Hmm, when discussing the inlets for the engines, two things come to mind: First of all, yes, they are rather small, but so are the engines. And unless building am combination of RAM jet and conventional turbo jet/turbo fan with afterburner, small engines don´t require large intakes. Second, the hightend position of the intakes should be rather effective against ground based radar, since they can hardly be seen from below. Therefore, the designers might have had a higher interest in optimizing the stealth characteristics concerning ground radar compared to airbased radar systems. Finally, there was the question of why it might be wanted to be wanted to have a plane with the capability of using manual controls instead of a fly-by-wire system. First of all, this means that there is a high degree of redundancy and savety: A plane, that can be flow manually, will be more likely to survive once the electronics fail, e.g. when being hit by bullets or shrapnel or as a result of an EMP: not every country has EMP hardened electronics at hand. These two aspects of the design make me wonder, if the aircraft might be a ground attacker and/ or optimized of use in a conflict that includes nuclear weapons.
@Power5
Жыл бұрын
Again, the FBW system is only 1 of hundreds of systems in the jet. Unless this is just a reskinned pre-coldwar jet, an EMP will kill everything in the jet except the ability to control the glide to the ground. Not exactly helpful. But as you said, when the iranian electronics likely fail, the pilot would be able to still control what is left still functioning on the jet.
@drmorcoch9338
Жыл бұрын
your comment is actually very funny. the only way this piece of junk will ever get off the ground is if you push it off a cliff
@atoriusv5070
8 ай бұрын
Ground attack? With two bombs of capacity and no internal guns? Nah. If anything it's an interceptor, but they didn't properly plan for decreasing the signature other aircraft's radar. But I'm leaning hard towards it being fake or nearly completely useless.
@alistairbest3622
Жыл бұрын
$80 million per unit for F-35, versus $5 million per unit for an Iranian jet, that explains everything.
@romman3133
Жыл бұрын
The reason for broken wings is use of ground effect , its makes the fighter be able to fly stably fly at very low altitude
@artiomvv569
Жыл бұрын
It's so stealthy that we haven't even seen it at all (other than the taxiing tests from mock ups)
@artiomvv569
Жыл бұрын
@JZ's BFF I mean, canvas and plywood was used for the Horten Ho 229 which had a smaller radar cross section than a Spitfire or Mustang. The materials absorb radar waves instead of bouncing them back i think
@artiomvv569
Жыл бұрын
@JZ's BFF dummy or fake vehicles are still being used for deception as of today. Like Ukrainians are using wooden mock ups of HIMARS launchers and inflatable tanks to deceive the Russians
@jacksontrevor191
Жыл бұрын
@JZ's BFF Japan lost terribly
@jacksontrevor191
Жыл бұрын
@JZ's BFF you the one sitting up here pretending like Japan was this great deceiver they didn't even realize their codes had been broken just like Iran ain't got nowhere neat a stealth fighter
@randyeduo
Жыл бұрын
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
@NarekAvetisyan
Жыл бұрын
This thing looks like it came out of a Kinder Surprise.
@dancingkitty11
7 ай бұрын
So stealthy that not even the Iranians have seen it fly.
@user-xq7tr6st5y
7 күн бұрын
@MrPathanoo
11 ай бұрын
YUP!! I also made a stealth aircraft which flys at the Hypersonic speed and I keep it in my latrine.
@DrJiKentauriuzHero
Жыл бұрын
Hypothetically speaking, I think the reason why the Iranians probably went for manual controls is that they might be aware/afraid that they lack the sufficient means to counter advanced electronic warfare systems that many modern fighters are equipped with.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
Жыл бұрын
Their domestic missiles, drones and loitering munitions obviously have no manual controls as they lack pilots. Seems weird to trust missiles to not suffer from EW and then fear that electronic shielding is insufficient.
@Typexviiib
Жыл бұрын
I think it's more the recognition that they lack software engineers capable of designing the system. Ew isnt much of a threat to fly by wire.
@bluesnjax9134
Жыл бұрын
I wonder if it is to allow them to fly through an EMP?
@Typexviiib
Жыл бұрын
@@bluesnjax9134 this is a more likely scenario, but it seems like a really outdated way to handle the problem. However it would be an economical way to handle it. My question is, why would that be such a concern for the designers of this plane? Nuclear bombs are the only realistic source of an emp powerful enough to disrupt fly by wire. Is Iran developing a tiny short range stealth strategic bomber? This would match up well with the mechanical controls and air intake location.
@TexasGreed
Жыл бұрын
@@Typexviiib I dont know shit about EMPS but wouldnt that fry the aircrafts APU and it would lose power supply for ignition of fuel? I would imagine all electronics would be useless making the fighter only good for landing or unguided gun runs and MAYBE un guided bombs or rockets if they also designed them to not need electronic control systems. Radar would fry i think too. IR and radar seeker heads in your missiles would be toast. But I guess if you can get the aircraft home safely it can be repaired and used again.
@vitoriaes4042
Жыл бұрын
Confiança é tudo. se você não acredita, jamais conquistará, Nós acreditamos nos irmãos iranianos!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
@mansari7310
Жыл бұрын
tanks man .respect from iran this american are really arrogance
@ebadidronepilot
Жыл бұрын
🇮🇷🇮🇷🙏
@amirbehradi112
Жыл бұрын
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@Karenmovahed_LA
8 ай бұрын
Thanks,but terrorist sepah whit this shit and so much things like that becomes a shame for our nation 😂
@colonalklink14
Жыл бұрын
It's amazing what plywood, Elmer's glue, and duct tape can produce!
@mansari7310
Жыл бұрын
main reasons why the Iranian jets Qaher 313 does not want to completely be relying on computer wire system is to stopping plane crashing due to emp or hacking and since their adversaries are technologically capable it's pretty smart move to in addition to wire systems have the ability to work in their absence due to computer hacking or emp.
@BlackPill-pu4vi
Жыл бұрын
Flying without a computer requires an aircraft planform that is inherently stable. Stable is good for passenger airliners but, not for fighters. What Iran needs is Russian assistance to make the Qaher 313 become a reality and good enough to take to the Paris Airshow. Until people see it flying at the airshow and parked for inspection by VIPs, it doesn't count and doesn't matter. Iran was rightfully humiliated when they tried to pass off a R/C model as the real thing and a taxi test where the main gear had hidden electric motors to move it along. Iran needs a real propaganda victory with the Qaher 313. I have no doubt that what Iran and Russia come up with will be bigger and the engines covered with something more robust than the plastic fuselage around the exhaust. But, it MUST look like the Qaher 313 that was roundly mocked and now shows itself in Paris as the equal of, say, the Saab Gripen.
@mansari7310
Жыл бұрын
@@BlackPill-pu4vi f35 took 35 years to finish the development and dozens of countries were involved in that project and you expect Iran to do it two years after showing the prototype of curse they are fake just like their drone that US intelligence told us Iranian drone are epoxy mockup propaganda and footage of them in flight are photoshoped fake. but since 2019 that they attacked Saudi oil infrastructure and patriot system couldn't stop them. and 1 patriot system destroyed by Iranian drone in UAE same patriot that failed again and again against cheapest Iranian drone In Saudi and UAE and recently in Syria that resulted in 1 dead and 6 injured American. ridiculous Ukraine claim is a pr propaganda ordered by US to change the embarrassing results of patriot missile but Iranian Khordad 3 which not even the best of Iranian air defense design (the best is Bavar 373) shot down the most expensive drone In the world (global hawk) with the first attempt in 32000 altitude that supposed to be out of reach of air defense missile the best Iranian air defense design and development is Bavar 373 which Russia's aviation expert admitted is superior to s300 but he also said it behind s400 but only in range . so, from an objective and unbiases look at comparison of their weapons performance it would become obvious that USA was engaging in propaganda in exaggerating and overhyping their own weapons without any evidence to backed it up and engage in anti-Iranian propaganda to smear them by blatant lies that their drone epoxy. the Lier and propagandist is the US not IRAN you westerners have no idea about Iran except through western anti Iran propaganda. but outside their propaganda they themselves admit to Iranian advancement. but not in media ASPI which is Australian technology tracker put Iran among top ten technology superpower in all 44 critical strategic technology and in 7 of them in top 5 . what about US Persians without exception either winning or in top 3 in science Olympia. Iran unveiled hypersonic missile. Iran is among the countries that put satellite in orbit and only 8country can do that indigenously and none of them achieved it while under sanctions and embargo. the first award winning female mathematician was Iranian result of Tehran sheriff university of technology. Iran Ranks 5th in World Nanotechnology. Iran rank 13th In AI development according to global data institute and others Iran in top 5 manufacturers of gas turbine by capacity which is a critical strategic technology only handful of countries are poses after German Siemens stop the delivery of its gas turbine Iran mapna group sent 40 gas turbines with higher efficiency and lower price to Russia. Russia is dependent on Iran for its aviation spare part for airliner. Iran sending car, medicine, surgical robot, corona vaccine, gas turbine, drone, composite material and many more. and i remind you again Iran is under Sevier sanction for 45 years
@nimomemre6550
Жыл бұрын
I'm telling you brother, it doesn't matter to me how efficient this jet is going to be. And apart from laughing on these military innovations just because of their Irani origin, I think the design of this jet is super cool. 👍 Iran is really creative and in terms of drones like Shahed 136 & Mohajer 6 are not only creative but also very effective.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
Creative is not the word I'd use to call a bunch of Ali Express flying roombas with plastic explosives ductapped to the underside.
@kaizer7568
6 ай бұрын
@@supermaster2012you haven't seen those drones
@supermaster2012
6 ай бұрын
@@kaizer7568 they have been downed over Ukraine and they are literally Ali Express garbage ductaped together with chinesium tape. They run a Chinese clone of a raspberry pi 2b but with only 2 a56 cores. The camera is 480p and can only pan 5 degrees, no gimbal or stabilizer. The lipo battery is the most dangerous part of the air roomba.
@kaizer7568
6 ай бұрын
@@supermaster2012 as I said you haven't seen them. The Iranian drones have proven to be more effective and very cheap. Do you know why Ukraine stopped using Bayraktar, because they were useless against the Russians
@kaizer7568
6 ай бұрын
@@supermaster2012Better look for a picture of a Shahed drone online. They aren't poor built are you say
@mundanestuff
Жыл бұрын
I would love to know what happens when you fly at increased angle of attack and the air stalls in the inlets. Be that is what will happen. You will suffocate the engines and stall them, then you stall and pancake into the desert at terminal (for you) velocity.
@waitingforanalibi2224
Жыл бұрын
Ahh, the boundary layer effect. The nemesis of aircraft designers the world over!
@alinili5569
Жыл бұрын
Come on Man never mind angle of attack. The thing doesn’t exist and it was made of potty’s And even Potty fell apart after 6 months
@icyneko9175
Жыл бұрын
The rest of the world: We want our jets to be stealthy and be supermaneuverable so that it can do the Pugachev's Cobra and the falling leaf... Iran: I want a jet with funny angles Iran is built different
@carlosandleon
Жыл бұрын
what if it climbs backwards? Like upside down? Like the space shuttle?
@atoriusv5070
8 ай бұрын
I was just coming into the comments to say that! It'll choke the engines out due to lack of air. So either this aircraft is BS or they plan to NEVER aggressively climb or dogfight. I'm going with the former. It's all nonsense with mockups to look like they're advanced without putting any money or effort into it. It worked for soviet Russia, but it's definitely not gonna work for them.
@gavinchristiantoro
Жыл бұрын
Usually an analog control is meant to provide necessary cueing and feedback to the pilot.
@cyclone3999
11 ай бұрын
At least in race cars, We drivers like to avoid any drive by wire inputs as this increases the amount of feedback we get through the controls, allowing us to have a better feel for the car. I assume the lack of fly by wire controls on this jet is there for a similar reason. Giving the pilot a better feel for his aircraft and the air around him.
@ktwei
Жыл бұрын
You mean the thing (not plane) that taxis around with the pilots knees above the canopy rail?
@zainch4297
Жыл бұрын
Yeah this dude will do anything to make a video
@zainch4297
Жыл бұрын
This wasn't even a jet
@flymacseamus3474
Жыл бұрын
That pilot was part of the Iranian Revolutionary Basketball Team
@dark_lord_0169
Жыл бұрын
Iran Air force should stick to Drones.
@skydiver1013
Жыл бұрын
The Conqueror F313 is so stealthy, nobody will ever see one flying.
@adrianshephard224
Жыл бұрын
Just as Iranians didn't saw stealth drone RQ170 flying. OH WAIT? They did and they stole it from stupid overconfident Yanks, landed it in the middle of their air base and inspected the entire thing screw by screw. Now they spanking Ukraine so hard on it's arse, that type of red hot glow is sufficient to bake a cake. HAHA!
@based_asian.2119
Жыл бұрын
Just like you said about shaheed drone
@user-nf6ot5di4o
Жыл бұрын
@@based_asian.2119 damn
@stephenkalatucka6213
Жыл бұрын
O K, guys. We could call it "conqueror, or P.O.S. Mark VI.
@Alikianipanah1995
Жыл бұрын
You will see its (as a stealth drone) flying over some EU countries soon. ☺️🇮🇷💌
@m.anthonyc.8761
Жыл бұрын
Let me guess, it's even lightweight because there's no need for brakes either. A trap door opens up below the pilot and they drag their feet to slow the aircraft down.
@engrfka
5 ай бұрын
This video should be tagged as 'comedy'
@dave_riots
Жыл бұрын
Iran already sort of does have stealth jets, but they're unmanned, few in numbers, and fewer of them are actually armed with nothing more than air to ground weapons. Not to say they couldn't design a stealth fighter of their own, but it'll take a lot of resources and time to do so, even if they have technical assistance from China and Russia.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
you mean the Ali Express flying suicide roombas?
@dave_riots
Жыл бұрын
@@supermaster2012 No, like actual surveillance drones like the Shahed 171 Simorgh and Shahed Saegheh. They both come in armed and unarmed configurations and are both probably flying over Ukraine right now in support of Russian troops. Most military drones use a lot of off the shelf equipment to reduce costs, since most military drones are meant to be disposable anyway.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
@@dave_riots aka terrorist renamed Ali Express drones.
@Peakfreud
Жыл бұрын
@@dave_riots You're too smart to be down here.
@Not0nSaturn
Жыл бұрын
It’s so stealthy and “homemade” that you won’t even see it in real life! Woah!!!
@FoundAndExplained
Жыл бұрын
I’m loving these comments
@ranginkamoonebirang1009
Жыл бұрын
yeah they said our drones are Photoshop and toys ten yrs ago you keep taking we keep building
@josephc.9520
Жыл бұрын
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 I have always been amazed by Iran's drone development but your questionable profile picture makes it hard for me to believe you are not a government bot. Seriously, are you that petty regarding Israel?
@ranginkamoonebirang1009
Жыл бұрын
@@josephc.9520 they own the media thats why you think they are not bad its an old saying that a jew will hit you while crying and screaming like they are being hit they killed our scientists people snd still are attacking our country none stop they literally support separatists against my country why should i be a government bot to hate the enemy?! actually my profile is not even 1% of what i really feel about them
@cemo3292
Жыл бұрын
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 Building 10 thousand dollar drones are different then building stealth aircrafts my guy 😂
@shadow_spark8788
Жыл бұрын
Iranian gov: Our country needs a new stealth fighter jet! Engineer right after complition any of Ace Combat games: I've got an idea!
@vindictivegrind9370
4 ай бұрын
Some Iranian who downloaded some 3D plane models from SketchUp: *_"Hold muh hookah!"_*
@subjectc7505
Күн бұрын
It's so stealth, it's been deployed multiple times..in CGI and dreams.
@SAMax2268
Жыл бұрын
Interesting, as an aeronautical engineer I am not entirely convinced by the overall design. There are some aspects to this concept in that it at least gives countries venturing into this area of aerial defence a platform from which to build on. Right now, I think they are a good few years away from service.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
As an aeronautical engineer, what is your hot take on this thing being a bunch of cardboat ductapped to an F5? Because that's what it is...
@Cobrax_x
Жыл бұрын
For high altitude nuke EMP, it would be the most advanced operational fighter jet in the air in such a case.
@colincampbell767
Жыл бұрын
Actually just about every US military aircraft will still be flying. And even a lot of consumer electronics and just about every car will also. You'd be surprised about just how much stuff has to be protected from electromagnetic interference.
@zXPeterz14
Жыл бұрын
Except every other electrical system, like the fuel pumps etc woukd still go down, guess itll be a pretty cool glider though 😅
@MizanQistina
Жыл бұрын
To think about it - manual control can't be hacked - manual control is immune from EMP blast More electronic and digitalized, more vulnerable from EMP and hackers
@VistokDB
10 ай бұрын
The fact after the end of WT ad it became the most replayed. everyone skipping ads
@RandomTrinidadian
Жыл бұрын
Probably the only jet that was laughed out of existance. Its so stealthy, ot has not been seen in almost a decade 😁
@michaelfried3123
Жыл бұрын
I'm certainly laughing at the silly premise of this video...Iran is now gonna go from 50 year old F-14's with no replacement parts to stealth? While under heavy sanctions... right, and I have a bridge to sell too. Silly stuff for idiots is what this channel produces.
@vindictivegrind9370
Жыл бұрын
LOL! North Korea's military projects are more believable than this Iranian crap.
@michaelwheeler2275
Жыл бұрын
Listen, if Iran has that jet, it will create the most deadly surprise attack after 9/11 😟
@michaelfried3123
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelwheeler2275 Iran has tiny little plastic boats and a bunch of missiles, that's about it. I'm more afraid of my neighbors dog (he's a Chihuahua) than I am of anything Iran has in its military.
@hellothere1656
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelfried3123 Iran does have its own locally made frigates and semi heavy submarines. They also made what seems to be a reverse engineered version of the Russian supercavitating torpedo. Something the US Navy doesn't have. U can underestimate them all u want, but it aint smart to underestimate someone that much.
@chrisgaming9567
Жыл бұрын
The manual control thing is easy to explain, it's to be able to use the aircraft even when computer equipment is at risk of being hacked
@brucevu7917
Жыл бұрын
It would also be cheaper and les complex, yeah?
@BlyGuy
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely. Just think what would happen to the US airfleet if our computers were hacked/infected or rendered inoperable via EMP. You could still fly the F4's and some Tomcats (we probably have quite a few that could be made flight capable relatively quickly) I think. Any others in the US fleet that are candidates?
@bartandroid123
Жыл бұрын
The cocpit they showed off is litterally instruments from a cessna.
@CaptChang
Жыл бұрын
Or simply "don't have any".
@vinrico6704
Жыл бұрын
I agree 100% with it cant be hacked but it can be broke visa vie physical damage. All of this is moot as Iran is not capable of building a gen 5 or 6 stealth fighter plane. They harvested more info on aeronautics from this very comments section than they ever did reverse engineering f-5s, f-14s, and some recent drones they have been able to capture.
@tomspeed2000
Жыл бұрын
That bump under cabine belong to the nightingale ,while the pilot sitting in the jet the birds will singing for he
@kala-ujala
Жыл бұрын
Iran and stealth fighter..lol..100 years away
@classicmoviez3909
Жыл бұрын
Can u build a toilet street 💩💩😂😂
@Dagreatdudeman
Жыл бұрын
My guess is that the 313 is body kit for the F5. Much like how Pontiac Fieros were turned into Ferraris.
@ramtosantosa7661
Жыл бұрын
I second this,
@RRninja-jq6lp
Жыл бұрын
usa did similar with f117 and it was a (basically )succes
@James-rn7dx
Жыл бұрын
Then they painted it black so they could call it stealth. They may actually think black paint is all it takes!!
@RRninja-jq6lp
Жыл бұрын
@James Iran made a lot of advancements in nanotechnology, so they might have developed an actual stealth coating
@ramtosantosa7661
Жыл бұрын
@@James-rn7dx so imma half stealth okay
@keiththorpe9571
Жыл бұрын
Their aircraft's lack of fly-by-wire computer control is not an advantage, no matter what they say. They haven't incorporated it into their jet because they don't have the expertise or (probably) the computer tech necessary to add it. Also, any claim of making the aircraft immune to EMP is ridiculous, because American combat vehicles reliant on computer control and netcentric warfare systems are hardened against EMP effect. If they're concerned about compromised operability due to EMP, it's only because, there too, their technology is lacking.
@swedhgemoni8092
Жыл бұрын
I can see how hardened the RQ-170 was against EW...they downed it in mint condition.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
Жыл бұрын
@@swedhgemoni8092 It's a drone. A pilot inside wouldn't be fooled by spoofing.
@swedhgemoni8092
Жыл бұрын
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD The systems would be. Especially given how reliant platforms like F-35 and upwards are on datalinks...a repeat of that would sever the connection with wingmen and leave the whole formation vulnerable (F-35 is a worthless aerodynamic turd by itself and I've zero confidence in it's survivability if forced into a standalone engagement).
@yestermonth
Жыл бұрын
I think fiber optic cables are more harder to EMP, just slap that on your fighter like the Koreans.
@lolcatize12
Жыл бұрын
@@yestermonth Nah man, too expensive.
@Jefff72
Жыл бұрын
IMO the odds of spotting Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny will be higher than spotting the F313 in flight.
@DemsRNutless
6 ай бұрын
I laughed so hard my belly started to laugh too 😂😂😂.
@garydavis1557
Жыл бұрын
I'm very impressed with the stealth design of this plane. Because I don't see it leaving the ground.
@chenhao778
Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Hykje
Жыл бұрын
The stealth design prevents you from getting a speeding ticket when driving on the highway.
@randyeduo
Жыл бұрын
you saw it in the air, didn't you? typical westerner, you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
@aligamming1037
Жыл бұрын
Because iran had not taken the flying shot
@boluwajiolalekan4173
Жыл бұрын
Open your eyes
@benjohnson9532
Жыл бұрын
A mechanical aircraft will help against EMP style attacks.. or they simply do not have the tech to have a fully electronically controlled plan
@marcsole4261
Жыл бұрын
Caution they have a new flying carpet
@colincampbell767
Жыл бұрын
You realize that EMP defenses became standard in all military hardware during the 1950's - right?
@nebulaunfolding
Жыл бұрын
Also computers and their cases are heavy. Small aircraft can get away with manual control.
@rezah336
5 ай бұрын
if iran can control missiles then they can control a plane
@JamesSmith-er2pn
Жыл бұрын
No fly by wire serves two main purposes: 1. They're sanctioned which makes it hard for them to get components 2. If facing an adversary that has greater technological means analog controls are the safer bet over digital controls systems. ///they probbly dont want to see the flying version of Stux-net.
@HadrianDan
10 ай бұрын
Ghost of Iran is similar to what the Red Baron was about. Finding neat as well Tanks of Iran and Egypt. Their faith is fair game so far, much to admire.
@Kyujin666
Жыл бұрын
Despite all its flaws must admit it's a pretty badass design 😎
@colincampbell767
Жыл бұрын
The design look badass. But has never actually flown.
@JesseKnight2000
Жыл бұрын
The IAIO Qaher-313 looks so freaking Awesome
@PasleyAviationPhotography
Жыл бұрын
FREAKING!
@RandomTrinidadian
Жыл бұрын
And thats all
@xenos7583
Жыл бұрын
Looks ugly ngl
@vindictivegrind9370
4 ай бұрын
@@xenos7583 They probably stole some kid's 3D plane model from SketchUp
@Idiotresponsibly
Жыл бұрын
Cant wait for the first pilot to do a high G pull and have the canards create a vacuum in front and cause a double compressor stall
@marcolisi6726
Жыл бұрын
It's a start is what it is. I don't think it will fly but it is something for Iran to gain experience with. They will learn from it and come up with ideas to work within their means. I live in Canada and wish my government would have the balls to start a fighter program and build up an aviation industry from there instead of relying on everyone else.
@kingdomofprussia9749
Жыл бұрын
Wow, the only positive comment about Iran in this entire comment section Props to you 👍
@nancyswildlifemore.nancyst9169
7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@philipcooper4375
Жыл бұрын
They decided to power it with engines America designed in 1956 for the T-38 trainer,later becoming the F-5 tiger☺️probably the best part of the plane 😄
@RonJeremy514
Жыл бұрын
Hey at least it will probably emit less IR signature. Now concealing it is another story.
@randyeduo
Жыл бұрын
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously--thats why u cn;t see the fact of the matter
@zAvAvAz
Жыл бұрын
i love the design and it is simple and functional
@Willtolov
8 ай бұрын
Being able to override automatic aircraft functions is vital... computers fail and are subject to many glitches.
@Tswa567
Жыл бұрын
About the only advantage i could think of not having fly by wire is that it becomes moderately less susceptible to EMPs (which currently can only be generated by high altitude nukes, so… i think you’d have other issues)
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
you're forgetting the obvious advantage, that you can't make a fly by wire system out of cardboard.
@Cooe.
Жыл бұрын
It's due to sanctioned computer chips. It's really not that hard to understand.
@ThePilot4ever
Жыл бұрын
The "I want to believe" of stealth fighters
@SeSmokki
Жыл бұрын
That's also the Su-57
@cemo3292
Жыл бұрын
@@SeSmokki at least SU-57 can fly not like the crap in this video 😂
@mfrfpv9079
Жыл бұрын
Fly by wire is not emp resistant. So a nuke won't take you out of the air also not susceptible to chip shortages
@coolcalm1605
4 ай бұрын
It's good for support close combat range. I believe it the best in this class. This fighter only needs a 100-meter runway and can fly at low altitudes to evade radar detection. Go ahead. But for fighter in the category of F22, F35, Su 57, Su 35, Iran should build bigger turbofan and new bigger size of Qaher 313.
@Jaco93
Жыл бұрын
Lol amazing what you can do with an F5, some cardboard boxes and sticky tape, clearly a world beater…some would say the position of the intakes would cause some compressor stall issues during medium to high AOA manouvering, but clearly the genius behind this design took that into account.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
be lucky that they didn't make it goat shaped.
@rolflandale2565
Жыл бұрын
2:37 Not necessarily full manual flight, If autonomously managed while manually navigated command, in stealth mode, inertia sensors & memorized geo map, can offer a human pilot stealth free-fly. 7:33 a smaller intake wouldn't necessarily supress air, because it offers ramjet sonic flow advantage, unfortunately the speed potential of the engine purpulstion rate is not demonstrated.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
it's literally a cardboard mockup, this thing doesn't and will never exist.
@rolflandale2565
Жыл бұрын
@@supermaster2012 lol, cardboard... It's "literally" CGI no dought. Nobody out of 🇮🇷 flight base has seen it. Was it a comp generated of a cardboard plan? *maybe*
@saeedfarmanali
Жыл бұрын
@@rolflandale2565 may be soon they will be spotted in Ukraine
@rolflandale2565
Жыл бұрын
@@saeedfarmanali However, most nations wouldn't sell their military arms supply, unless it's already in the outdated model phase. So far, Iran is doing this in prototype rehearsal. Then again, *maybe* they have something much greater than this model.
@DroneStrike1776
Жыл бұрын
Looks like something I would draw...when I was 8 years old.
@user-10cpu
6 ай бұрын
The shape of the wing does not mean that the jet is not fly by wire controlled, fly by wire can be used even without computer, the main goal of this technology is to reduce the strain and then computer was integrated. The shape of this wing will increase lift an reduce drag by decreasing the wing area and turbulence
@darthvader0219
Жыл бұрын
Looks like the XFA-36 from Ace Combat 3!
@daimaoryujin
Жыл бұрын
It needs stable manual control because the secret of the 313 is that it’s actually just a re-skinned F-5. They decided that since they have to build new planes anyways just make it look cool! They found a drawing one of the kids made and just decided to go with that…zoom zoooom!
@andrewvare3173
Жыл бұрын
Fly by wire has low survivsbility in an EMP event, for instance.
@jasonwise8957
10 ай бұрын
That bloody RQ-170 catapulted our drone program 😂😂😂
@AaronShenghao
Жыл бұрын
The drooped wing tip can be used for “wave riding”, similar to what used on XB-70
@CrossWindsPat
Жыл бұрын
Haha yea I doubt they are thinking about using their Mach shockwave to make travel more efficient lol. I would be surprised if that thing could even break the sound barrier.
@AaronShenghao
Жыл бұрын
@JZ's BFF yeah, XB-70 usually don’t drop the tip until passing supersonic. It don’t need be adjusted during wave riding like swing-wings. The reason for not droop the wingtip is for higher aspect ratio and improved low speed performance.
@theussmirage
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, this tiny jet with those massive intakes wouldn't break the sound barrier on a good day with a tailwind
@patrickcamp5885
Жыл бұрын
@@theussmirage "with a tailwind "?
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
the hot glue couldn't keep the cardboard together so it bent in the direction of gravity,
@mattsnyder4284
Жыл бұрын
If you are trying to avoid a EMP blast and survive, then a non-computer controlled plane would work best to destroy your enemies military support structure.
@Peakfreud
Жыл бұрын
Interesting idea. However if the U.S Government Built a 210 million dollar F22 without taking Emp into consideration, then we have much much bigger problem to be concerned with. Not saying you're wrong because it is possible, just expanding perspective.
@llaboy2000
Жыл бұрын
If you don't have fly by wire, your adversary cannot take it over electonically.
@pixelnazgul
4 ай бұрын
The wingtip pointing down is the same as wingtip pointing up on F-4. And albatross wing has been a concept for a long time. They could have gotten it from boeing, or not, because there's multiple ways to come to that, you can't know untill you ask them.
@ssnipess8153
Жыл бұрын
From personal experience manual flying is actually slightly better than computerised flying this is because the flying is more down to pilot skill and not AI. But for faster response in a battle situation computerised flying could or could not be delayed when a pilot inputs a manoeuvre this is because the competent has to translate it then input the move but with manual it’s done instantly
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
That's literally not a thing, most modern fighters are impossible to fly without fly by wire. Touch grass
@MonsieurPhilippe1
Жыл бұрын
An aerodynamically stable design does make sense, if you are lacking the capacities to develop fly-by-wire software, the avionics suite etc. In that case, anyone would try to close the gap, best possible, leaving headaches to the next generation, more time to catch up, included.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
it's kinda hard to made avionics suites out of cardboard.
@MonsieurPhilippe1
Жыл бұрын
That is not, what I meant.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
@@MonsieurPhilippe1 okay, here have a baguette and a white flag.
@MonsieurPhilippe1
Жыл бұрын
Capitulation accepted.
@St-nb3pv
5 ай бұрын
The RQ-170 was not "downed" by Iran. It had shut down due to system failure.
@tim18wheels76
Жыл бұрын
(Funny version) F313 mockup is what happens when you buy parts on Wish for your mockup. F313 Conqueror prototype just keeps telling itself, "I think I can. I think I can."
@attackontitanfan.4880
Жыл бұрын
Iran has passed its test in ballistic missiles, drones, tanks, be sure that it will perform in the best way in fighter jets as well. Iran's F313 is very similar to China's FC31, I believe it is a Chinese fighter and Iran wants to assemble it. And China has given the technology of this fighter to Iran.
@Avgeek-
Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see a video on South Africa's Project CARVER (New Generation Fighter Aircraft) and the impact it had on the development of the Atlas Cheetah under Project TUNNY.
@mwanikimwaniki6801
Жыл бұрын
Just Googled it gaddamn.That woulda been amazing.
@lenadams854
Жыл бұрын
And mbb lamp Lampyridae
@gloin10
Жыл бұрын
The plane, as shown/described in the video resembles a scaled-down prototype....
@reyhemj6668
Жыл бұрын
Iran is filled with the f5s . That's how it work . They just took everything off of a F5 and put them in some piece of metal
@aurorajones8481
Жыл бұрын
2:50 Id argue direct control is always best. Obviously as a last resort back up which is why those features are here in this. Its a bit much but in the modern day of electronic warfare they might have worries about having their fighter's control paths blocked possibly by some electro jamming device. Hey I'm using my brain here. Think about it tho. Thats how drones have been taken out in the past. They jam the flight control or flat out take it over from drones. Why not use the same tech to swat fighters out of the sky.
@aurorajones8481
Жыл бұрын
Im referring to drones being taken over. Not actual fighters but why not.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
Жыл бұрын
Because jet fighters are not piloted remotely. Drones are hacked typically by spoofing GPS and telling the drone that it is landing in friendly territory. A pilot inside the aircraft that controls the aircraft will not land simply because the control logic tells him to.
@lindellsiler5994
Жыл бұрын
I'm no expert but here goes. FBW and other systems may be beyond their design capability and daily serviceability. What real good is a hangar queen when you need a sortie now. Using parts/engines/weapons that you trust and are available might make sense for a country that changes allies and enemies occasionally. The desire to have a new wave F5/MIG21 I can understand but can they pull it off? That remains to be seen.
@psyamok3735
Жыл бұрын
Iran is still flying F14, and 3D printing spare parts for it's aging fleet. If they can build their own fighter jets, they would have retired F14 long ago.
@peterk2455
Жыл бұрын
They really have upped their game. Their materials science alone has taken them from cardboard and plywood to plastic and 2 pack paint.
@CaptChang
Жыл бұрын
Could it be that the current version is just a new skin on an existing F-5 to make it a bit more lik F-14 but with some stealth? Yes, I know it's single tail vs twin tail, but it seems to make sense given what they have to work with, much like Taiwan's IDF looked like a weird mish-mash of F-5, F-16, and F/A-18 (with a dash of some Mirage jets in there) It's clear they don't have the avionics to make a true 5th gen stealth fighter, but can this this be even called 4.5gen? It's likely without radar as well, so it'd be CHEAP compared to a true 5th gen , much like F-5 vs F-14.
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
it's a coardboard mockup made from a 3D model they got from Fiver.
@sauronthemighty3985
6 ай бұрын
This jet looks like it was designed by sci fi artists who have no idea how planes actually work
@user-si8cf2we5w
18 күн бұрын
so stealth that not even iran can see it?
@raresuperjake6628
Жыл бұрын
The reason I believe manual control is used is because emps would be ineffective against it
@dreamhunter2973
Жыл бұрын
They can't even make a supersonic trainer jet on their own....🙄... How the Heck are they gonna make a 5th generation jet....🙄
@nishadshirodkar6091
Жыл бұрын
Love your work !!!, hopefully one day the Indian aircrafts get the stage too 😁!
@vinrico6704
Жыл бұрын
India can actually build real planes not toys like these guys make
@supermaster2012
Жыл бұрын
@@vinrico6704 yet can't build a functioning toilet.
@vinrico6704
Жыл бұрын
@@supermaster2012 everyone has strengths and weakness...
@meDarkmask
Жыл бұрын
After reading it, I want to say that this is a bluffing😅 fighter, which is more suitable for drones.
@charliehigglons7490
Жыл бұрын
I actually like the airframe design but what doesn't make sense to me is the position of the intake. From the front you can see these rectangular profiles on the sides. This is where I would expect the intakes to be. The inlets are too small for a twin jet, they could work for a single engine design though. The airframe itself would work if this was rectified
@RandomStranger10
10 ай бұрын
so stealthy, that not even its pilotes have seen it yet.❤
Пікірлер: 2,5 М.