Joe before 2020: That's entirely possible Joe after 2020: That's not outside the realm of possibility
@trackzero0
2 жыл бұрын
Lmao!
@hamzamahmood9565
2 жыл бұрын
Joe 2022: It's not impossible ya know. Chimps do it
@madlad453
2 жыл бұрын
2025: but it's a possibility... on dmt.
@beaudickerson1390
2 жыл бұрын
Evolution
@sandylynn7343
2 жыл бұрын
Have you seen “Elon Musk meets Alex Jones” It’s crazy!! 😂 👽
@Az56818
2 жыл бұрын
They should put a warning saying this contains misleading information everytime a politician talks
@meorme6603
2 жыл бұрын
There should be protest infront of every fake news building🙌
@MarkSmith-dx3cd
2 жыл бұрын
or anyone else for that matter.
@JohnnyDarko01
2 жыл бұрын
yeah they'll only do it for one side tho.
@brianschwartz7351
2 жыл бұрын
Especially JOE BIDEN and the democrats!
@the.shotgun.approach
2 жыл бұрын
or everytime Fox News is on air.
@thatf_inguy8220
2 жыл бұрын
The biggest problem with modern society is that we've lost our appetite for nuance. If you believe in climate change, but dont believe its an imminent threat that deserves 100% of our attention and resources, you dont have a ideological home. Our current society forces you to pick a team, then adopt all tenants of that teams beliefs. Some people are more than willing to do this. The ones that don't often find themselves disgusted and withdraw completely from the discussion, leaving only the fundamentalists to engage in the debate.
@omnipotentbanana1576
2 жыл бұрын
If you believe in and understand climate change, then you will know that it is an issue that demands a huge amount of our attention and resources, far more than we are giving it now. I'm sorry man, but it's just that simple, this isn't about opinions, it's about facts. And facts don't care about your feelings.
@thatf_inguy8220
2 жыл бұрын
@@omnipotentbanana1576 I dont disagree with you. Climate change is very real and requires immediate action. If you read my comment, Im simply arguing that we need to be realistic about our approach. This means we cannot allocate 100% of our attention and resources on this one issue There are other issues which kill far more people today and those require attention and resources as well. You cannot say that no issue is as important as climate change.
@omnipotentbanana1576
2 жыл бұрын
@@thatf_inguy8220 Thats true, but there is not a single country in the world that is doing enough about it in the first place, so its hardly a very unpopular position
@pluntchgunster6156
2 жыл бұрын
@@thatf_inguy8220 What about an issue that kills millions of people? Nah, thats not really an issue.
@strings1586
2 жыл бұрын
@@omnipotentbanana1576 You are an extremist. A radical. Dial back the diet of Reddit and Don Lemmon.
@zackboudreau1834
2 жыл бұрын
People acknowledge it’s a problem… but people don’t acknowledge politicians will use it as a tool to pass a big bill and do nothing about it. That’s our biggest problem.
@JL_Lux
2 жыл бұрын
There hasn’t been a bill passed to address it….
@DragonCaptain
2 жыл бұрын
@@JL_Lux he did say "will", something that will happen, hasnt happened
@222ableVelo
2 жыл бұрын
Why are you speaking for everyone? I don't think it's a problem at all. And I have scientific, empirical, and logical reasons for thinking this is the case. So, no, not all people acknowledge it's a problem. It's not a problem. Especially people like me who have observed the decades where this was purposely made into a problem for various reasons -- and we witnessed it happen in real-time.
@poundlandbandit6124
2 жыл бұрын
@@222ableVelo What reasons do you have? Just out of curiosity
@222ableVelo
2 жыл бұрын
@@poundlandbandit6124 Well, I'll give you two big ones, although there are many more. First, pretty much everything that was predicted to happen from what scientists and advocates then called "global warming" (which they later changed to "climate change" ), has actually not happened at all. They were just flat out wrong. I'm mainly talking about all of the predictions from about 1998, 2000, 2008, 2012, 2017, 2018, etc...... None of it has actually occurred in real life. That's real-world, empirical evidence. Real science. The temperatures predicted are incorrect. The ice caps melting was incorrect. The sea levels rising to catastrophic levels was incorrect. No snow on certain mountain tops was incorrect. A lot of the climates they claimed would change, have not changed.... etc.. etc.. They are still the same overall -- although they fluctuate year by year, decade by decade within limits. Secondly, as I somewhat mentioned, the scientific models they constructed and relied on heavily for these predictions were incorrect. No matter how much they bloviated about how true they were, they have been proven wrong. So what does that say about their computer models? There are all sorts of other problems with the anthropogenic climate impact theories, that's just for starters.
@GS-zc4sk
2 жыл бұрын
As a city kid from the 70s I can tell you the cars have extremely cleaner exhaust emissions. What I don't see anymore is, focused pressure on chemical companies that STILL dump into our air & ground water. Destroying nature in the process.
@erik1tennant
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, and I have to say it’s ridiculous how there is so much pressure on people to buy electric cars when they aren’t as clean as they say, and how they think aviation is such a large problem to our climate when it only has a ~3% impact on CO2 emissions, as a whole. If it is that large of a problem, focus on power generation around the world, as it is a much larger part of emissions, and help develop nuclear fusion etc.
@austiniscoolduh
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. It’s not the average person’s fault. It’s the mega corporations, who are trying to push blame on us
@gunsandkithes6900
2 жыл бұрын
@@erik1tennant LOL if we try to point out the actual thingies that accounts for most of the emission, yall gunnna loose your shit saying we all coming to take awayyy your hamburgers cz cow fart XD. And We actually are focusing on power generation and everything, thats whats actually in the bill. But the bill is blocked by coal money in Dems pocket and god forbid if anyyyyyyyyyyy republican everrrr gives a shit.
@esquiredan2702
2 жыл бұрын
Most american cities are cleaner today than they were 30 years ago in terms of industrial pollution. The EPA and related regulations have done an ok job putting pressure on oil, chemical, and manufacturing companies to act more responsibly. It's far from perfect but better than it once was. That said, we as consumers have a responsibility too. We can't all just gaslight the discussion by saying "I'm a drop in the bucket, it's all about the evil corporations". Don't let anyone without good data convince you that EVs aren't better for the environment, or that Americans shouldn't worry about pollution because we can't control China/India, etc. Everyone benefits from a healthier environment and investing in more sustainable/efficient energy sources.
@erik1tennant
2 жыл бұрын
@@gunsandkithes6900 If you’re going to argue with my statement at least say it properly… right now it isn’t valid whatsoever.
@kayligo
2 жыл бұрын
I’m digging the log cabin vibe. Much nicer than the hell toaster.
@alex_schenck8
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@pull-pot7120
2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha I've had that same thought!!! Living in a Toaster Oven with Joe Rogan.
@gh7213
2 жыл бұрын
Lmao hell toaster
@mallamby13
2 жыл бұрын
Lmaoo
@thenoneckpeoplerepresentat8074
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah right, nothing reminds me of a log cabin more than red velvet drapes.
@almartin6227
2 жыл бұрын
KZitem needs to change “the climate” of their censorship department.
@nicolemathews9303
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/0ZuLzaN3raZ-e34 ⬆️Elon Musk meets Alex Jones! 😂 👽
@carlodave9
2 жыл бұрын
I'm not allowed on Joe Rogan's show. He won't amplify my opinions. I am being censored by Joe Rogan! I'm a victim! What f-ing whiney babies everyone has become. The Right most of all. To be a Republican now you have to incessantly whine on behalf of Trump. Dude totally ignores COVID for 3 crucial months. He's a victim! Loses an election. Victim! Is hundreds of millions in debt despite inheriting $400,000,000. Victim! Doesn't pay shit in taxes but whines about taxes. Victim! Gets to appoint thousands of judges and stack the Supreme Court for himself. Victim of the judiciary! Not one substantial thing is being done to adapt to the climate crisis but it's the deniers who are the victims, victims, victims!!!
@skidaddlej6786
2 жыл бұрын
@@carlodave9 deep breaths my friend, In and out, In and out, In and out, now calmly go and read some facts. Remember in and out deep breath’s.
@mandralliance
2 жыл бұрын
@@carlodave9 Man... You are being lied to. Please my friend... Go and search a bit. It will help you
@robertnajdovski1939
2 жыл бұрын
@@carlodave9 yes. Thank you. Freedom of speech does not mean you have freedom to a platform. Its like getting angry at a newspaper that they wont print your views every day
@iamtheslug40
2 жыл бұрын
Best starting point to understanding climate change is knowing that the earth does not care about your opinions
@oneloveleo1884
2 жыл бұрын
She doesn’t care and humans can’t control her
@ryanr4361
2 жыл бұрын
That, and the fact that we are literally running out of fish in the ocean. That's kind of a big talking point nobody brings up
@banquetmeal663
2 жыл бұрын
@@oneloveleo1884 Pretty sure we can control burning a bunch of shit and putting it into the atmosphere.
@mattblack118
2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't care about our CO2 emissions either. In fact it's plants rather like them.
@Jack-e5t
2 жыл бұрын
@@mattblack118 good job on winning dumbest comment ive read today
@cliffbooth8423
2 жыл бұрын
I feel Joe is speaking up a lot more lately. Love it
@Maza675
2 жыл бұрын
Cnn bullshitting about ivermectin might have been the last straw for him
@Xpistos510
2 жыл бұрын
He always spoke up. He's just lately been speaking up towards his right wing audience, and he's been consistent with his left-bashing. That's what's new.
@Fister_of_Muppets
2 жыл бұрын
Well how many high profile left outlets crapped on him... of course he's calling it as he sees it. Same reason he moved to Texas. People are getting fed up with the crazy woke/cancel/progressive/etc mindsst.
@kjs1069
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah he's real and averse to bullshit. The left's & controlling media's bullshit has been flowing thick lately.
@niks9652
2 жыл бұрын
@@Xpistos510 you americans should really forget about left and right lmao 2nd civil war incoming
@williamrivas7809
2 жыл бұрын
The world: “Don’t use Wikipedia on any schoolwork it’s not reliable” KZitem:
@PTPalmer_NPC
2 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia > any regular encyclopedia
@ericjohnson5617
2 жыл бұрын
You tube - hold my beer
@christopherbelanger6612
2 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia for anything not related to the contemporary events or contemporary biographies is actually pretty good.
@ericjohnson5617
2 жыл бұрын
@@christopherbelanger6612 so you're a fan of high schoolers using wiki as a citation or no?
@AgentSmith911
2 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia isn't a reliable because it can have been vandalized at the time you read the article. But to get a quick overview, it can be helpful. Just know that you need to check the sources used on the Wikipedia page.
@nfmjcn2687
2 жыл бұрын
Rob Lowe’s lost twin, Rob High
@OnPointFirearms
2 жыл бұрын
Bwahahahaha! Nice!
@luuul5254
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@drfuck
2 жыл бұрын
Single-handedly funnier than anything Joe Rogan has ever said
@halon7476
2 жыл бұрын
Nice 😂🤣👍
@Bonaccio
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@leegibson5469
2 жыл бұрын
No one can admit they are wrong anymore. On either side. "I'm right and your stupid." Its a dangerous mentality. That means we can no longer have constructive dialog anymore.
@mattblack118
2 жыл бұрын
There are no "sides" when trying to understand complex systems like climate and poverty. There are just many differing opinions on how they function and how to control them. If you are on a "side" then you have already lost the plot.
@abhinavdangwal6180
2 жыл бұрын
@@mattblack118 There are two sides. One that says anthropogenic climate change is real and the other that denies it. If you think that is not the case, then you don't know what you are talking about.
@bobs4429
2 жыл бұрын
@@mattblack118 In one sense I essentially agree. if one sees the issue in terms of "my side" and "your side" then the discussion has devolved into a competition of ideas -- of ideology. On the other hand I completely disagree with your assertion that there are only opinions of equal value. This is nonsense. Instead one needs to understand the issue at hand in terms of supporting evidence. In the case of anthropogenic climate change the evidence, which has been mounting in recent decades, has sufficient warrant and so is clear. It is real. To think that the notion of climate alarmism has equal merit is dangerous folly.
@timeWaster76
2 жыл бұрын
The way I see it the problem is once someone can belive in something they have zero proof for it's hard for the the change their thinking once real evidence is presented
@TopperPenquin
2 жыл бұрын
Yes we can... Climate Change Due to pollution is absolute Carl Sagan inspired Bullsh!t
@johnnytsunami3695
2 жыл бұрын
The last part is the truest as people moved away from religion they began to worship a new god of morality and politics and are unaware of it.
@JesusPerez-pl5cx
2 жыл бұрын
Bro you freaking snapped on this comment you on your Jordan Peterson shit
@mrwaltermathews
2 жыл бұрын
Everyone is in a religion but me. You follow science? That's religious. I'm the one clear thinking you should listen to me. See how stupid that critique is. Even based on the few metrics he mentions, it seems pretty clear this guys ability to analyze data isn't great. He made a bunch of money off of a book though. What are the chances the publisher is a conservative?
@SMOMEGA1
2 жыл бұрын
@@JesusPerez-pl5cx Let’s go Brandon!!!
@z.bongerman1062
2 жыл бұрын
Religion can't do anything outside of spirituality. Religion can not build a hospital, or educate a doctor, or cure a virus.
@iamBIGBROOX
2 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@whiteknob7944
2 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of how Red Bull loves the Earth so much they’ll go turn anything into a race track. Then talk at me like I’m the one killing the Panda bears.
@ivan2795
2 жыл бұрын
Did you know that polar bears are actually thriving?
@grimsolace4433
2 жыл бұрын
@@ivan2795 Of course white bears are thriving, but he's talking about them light furred bears, i.e. PANDAS. China should set them free!
@albertoalves1063
2 жыл бұрын
This reminds me that I live in the city, really far from the ocean, went to the beach 2 time im my life, but the straws that I used in home are killing all the turtles in the world. But no one ever answered my question that is "how my trash end up in the ocean?"
@johnfitbyfaithnet
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent point
@johnfitbyfaithnet
2 жыл бұрын
@@ivan2795 racist. *sarcasm *
@Sailing_seel
2 жыл бұрын
117 degrees in Portland. More than 120 degrees up near British Columbia. Ice storms all over Texas. Completely normal nothing to worry about here.
@dday881
2 жыл бұрын
I’m not saying that that’s not a legitimate objection, but those temperatures have existed in those areas in previous centuries at varied times.
@theunknown4570
2 жыл бұрын
Said it for 2 plus decades. You raised entitled generations. Now they are adults. And we all are going to pay dearly. My GOD. I did say this over and over again since 95.
@alexm2889
2 жыл бұрын
"they say I'm misleading!"... proceeds to mislead everyone listening...
@VisibilityFoggy
2 жыл бұрын
"Proceeds to say something snowflake left-wing lunatics disagree with, but cannot dispute since it's empirically correct, so they get around it by calling it 'misleading...'" - Fixed it for you.
@kathrynmercier4874
2 жыл бұрын
He tries to curtail the criticism of being misleading by being misleading, which is the irony this commenter is pointing out. Yes, technically, something being misleading is subjective, but this guy is being misleading even with every benefit of the doubt.
@aidonis98
2 жыл бұрын
2 billion people live on or near river delta's that will likely be brackish within a decade, but drugs are the problem. This guy is amazing.
@avienated
2 жыл бұрын
Why not 10 billion, let's make some really big numbers ya'll.
@Spratdragon
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah and my parents were told by scientists growing up that we were about to go into an ice age.
@aidonis98
2 жыл бұрын
Stay in the south. The real wall should be built around the great lakes.
@daverlb
2 жыл бұрын
Joe got so high before this that he achieved gain of function
@jacobmojapelo2448
2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@BigSmoke-bu6ib
2 жыл бұрын
You are buck wild
@etubrutus3501
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 that’s good
@jspella1477
2 жыл бұрын
What the ? Where did you hear that one before? It doesn’t apply here
@lesclaypoolonbass9431
2 жыл бұрын
High off what? Weed is illegal in his shitty ass state
@jonny-b4954
2 жыл бұрын
Why are deaths of storms the determining stat ? Its property damage thats biggest issue.
@rexringtail471
2 жыл бұрын
True, but prop damage is very hard to correlate directly to the increase in storms or their severity. Most of the increase in prop damage is due to increased value in the threatened area, which has very little to do with the storm itself, if anything. At least that is how it seems to me. Fatalities is a little bit better metric but still runs into a similar problem: more and more people live near the water, so are at greater risk.
@terrancewilliams9209
2 жыл бұрын
how about the strength of the storms. that seems like a good metric
@jonny-b4954
2 жыл бұрын
@@terrancewilliams9209 True but at the sametime no one really cares about a cat 4 storm that doesn't do any damage and stays in the middle of the Ocean. It's the metric of more and more of our coastal cities being wrecked more and more frequently that makes folks want to do something about it.
@jasonsimms8251
2 жыл бұрын
@@jonny-b4954 death is binary. Property damage could be because of insurance over-reporting, population rise, and people moving to "climate" prone areas like the coast and below sea level. Also the environmentalist are claiming that climate change will kill of humans not that it will damage their property.
@jonny-b4954
2 жыл бұрын
@@jasonsimms8251 Still, it's a bad gauge in my opinion. It's the cities destroyed that matters. No one really cares about a half dozen people lost to a storm. But the total turning upside down of one's life. Of one's day to day. Insurance over reporting is never a significant factor though. Someone may rip a few extra shingles off their roof to get the roof totally replaced but never met anyone who destroys their home to get paid. You never get what it's worth anyways. Even 10% fraud doesn't change the outlook all that much. Well, technically I've never heard of climate change people focus on the human death aspect personally. They've never focused on one thing in general. But more the basic toll on humans in general. Migration, your home destroyed, job lost, environmental damage, less spaces for humans to live (since we prefer to live near water) And yeah, I reckon deaths in 3rd world countries.
@Mojavehixon
2 жыл бұрын
everyone wants to talk about "us vs the environment" but no one likes talking about "us vs ourselves"
@timeslot09
2 жыл бұрын
We can't survive without the environment, we're inseparable from it.
@timeslot09
2 жыл бұрын
@Stu How else will humanity respond if alarm bells aren't ringing? Scientists have been raising the alarm since the 70's to try to turn this ship around. It's nearly too late now. I have little hope humanity will correct it. Sad for the earth and devastating for all of us who live on it.
@afishy1465
2 жыл бұрын
@Stu right right nothings changing at all go back to business as usual.
@yonidellarocha9714
2 жыл бұрын
@@afishy1465 again, as the OP said, you are focusing on the enviroment, instead of focusing on human behaviour and it's incentives. If you want to do something for the environment, you better start convincing people of not buying so much plastic crap, or better yet, create and grow a system that incentivizes not buying plastic crap. People respond much better to incentives (be them economical, cultural, sexual, etc.) than to argumentation and well polished debates. So, i can explain to you why buying certain foods in plastic containers is bad for your health, but you are going to keep buying it unless there is an actual instinctually based punishment (be it a higher price, social ostracism or the inauthenticity of the plastic version of a cultural item). So, next time, instead of condecendigly responding to a comment by sarcastically stating some unfalsifiable claim, i want you to remember the last plastic wrapping you threw away and try to feel as cocky about that as when you wrote that comment.
@boyzen45
2 жыл бұрын
@@timeslot09 In the 1970's The scientists were saying we were headed for a new ice age, then global warming, after that climate change, we're almost out of time so send your money to the richest people in the planet. (YOU) have to make sacrifices...
@stevebreedlove9760
2 жыл бұрын
The issue isnt people dying from hurricanes and heat waves. It is the collapse of agriculture and wide spread famine and war. You cant say people are cherry picking and then cherry pick.
@cardboardu6019
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly right. If honey bee populations collapse it doesn't much matter how many species of ants are left. This guy sucks bad.
@nikpetrovic3877
2 жыл бұрын
really misleading information. "frequency of natural disasters" and "number of deaths from natural disasters" are not the same thing. its just a ton of cherry picking and smoke n mirrors shit. this guy does suck
@cardboardu6019
2 жыл бұрын
@@nikpetrovic3877 100%
@JohnDoe-nq5pk
2 жыл бұрын
@@cardboardu6019 honey bee populations are not going to collapse. That is fear mongering. I was a beekeeper for a while and still know many personally.
@cardboardu6019
2 жыл бұрын
@@JohnDoe-nq5pk I said "If honey bee populations collapse it doesn't much matter how many different species of ants there are", at no point in that statement did I make a claim about any insects. I work in health care, I have no opinion on honey bee health. Sorry that wasn't more clear, that is my fault. I just meant something like, don't miss the forest for the trees.
@Boa796
2 жыл бұрын
Open Society Foundation employees going ham in the chat 😂
@HH-el8vp
2 жыл бұрын
Open society
@Bonaccio
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@lordnelsonmc.billionberg9166
2 жыл бұрын
Soros only wants butterlys and honey for all people 🦋 except for white people
@irishmeltdown8566
2 жыл бұрын
Username checks out
@PixelLulu
2 жыл бұрын
Isn't climate change more than just about what our climate is doing? Isn't it about conserving finite resources? Protecting vanishing ecosystems? Protecting our air? Protecting our water? Etc etc? I think as usual the politicians and news channels have done a terrible job at figuring out how to communicate what's really important about the climate change debate and it's led to the politicisation of a very relevant subject
@garad123456
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Even if we arent going extinct in the next 100yrs, we can only benefit from stopping pushing shit into the air and ocean
@kelvyquayo
2 жыл бұрын
It’s ultimately about money. The only civilian to walk on the Moon Harrison Schmidt called it out for what it was. It’s not that there’s not a problem.. it’s that the only people with any ability to tend the flock are wolves and that will never change.
@joshbull623
2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, it has devolved into "We are going to destroy our planet!!!" which is absolutely false. Taking even a glancing look at what the earth has endured in its billions of years, barring mass nuclear war, what we have done and can do doesn't even come close to what it has endured and healed from. But that is the stance that seems to be at the forefront, Earth will be destroyed because of humanity, not "lets have clean air and water because we breathe air and need to drink water". To quote George Carlin "The planet isn’t going anywhere; we are!". Everything is so hyperbolic which makes these important topics easy to dismiss when they should be discussed.
@darkgreenkid296
2 жыл бұрын
the problem can be true, but that doesnt mean that people who are in power are selling the true solution to that. its extremely naive.
@PixelLulu
2 жыл бұрын
A few assumptions on the replies to this post that caring about the state of the climate etc automatically makes you gullible as to what the people in power do behind closed doors?
@jamesvanderwire4667
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine feeling bad for Bari Weiss LMFAO!!!
@Lightningkuriboh
2 жыл бұрын
Word
@ratta_tat
2 жыл бұрын
@Nai Somar interesting...I didn't know. I'll check her out. Gotta keep an open mind right?
@buildlackey
2 жыл бұрын
Toadie !
@RegurgiNate84
2 жыл бұрын
All the scientists agree... When you fire every scientist who doesn't.
@holyhandgrenadeofantioch2019
2 жыл бұрын
The similarity of tactics between climate “science” and Covid “science” - getting clearer every day
@RegurgiNate84
2 жыл бұрын
@@holyhandgrenadeofantioch2019 Weird how both issues coincide with taking away all civil liberties away too...
@CaliMex96
2 жыл бұрын
>the Rogan experience
@rogerandes8
2 жыл бұрын
or threaten to fire. scientist gotta pay bills and eat too, just like the rest of us
@rogerandes8
2 жыл бұрын
@@holyhandgrenadeofantioch2019 i've noticed that too, AND if you really want to piss them off, check the similarities with climate science and the discovery institute
@marcusaurelius1935
2 жыл бұрын
I think joe should start bringing in prople with differrnt view points together so theres a debate rather than making isolated claims and then people going in their respective SM/news echo chambers amplify their prejudice.
@blackvo1d
2 жыл бұрын
Yea, like poor Gupta, who had to go around CNN on apology tour after JR podcast.
@fultratio
2 жыл бұрын
No need to hear the lefts bullshit cart of lies . If you have common sense then you know the climate emergency is just about $ . Hence the Canadian carbon tax . Does nothing but burden the people with an extra tax .
@nWofan4ever
2 жыл бұрын
@@fultratio okay so you would prefer to just live in a rightist echo chamber?
@charmolettafranquestafiestayam
2 жыл бұрын
@@blackvo1d He could have just told the truth in the first place but yanno.
@ichrised
2 жыл бұрын
That's not how interviews work, boss
@Bolensgoldrush
2 жыл бұрын
Wow this guy is kind of full of it. 1:15 He wasn't censored by FB. FB added a discretionary banner on his post saying that it may contain "misleading information". Censorship would be if FB tok down his post completely. And by the sounds of the rest of this interview, he did post misleading info. 2:26 He states that natural disasters are not getting worse, and then backs up that claim saying that "deaths from natural disasters have declined over 90% over the past 100 years". But death rate is not how the severity of natural disasters is determined. For seismic activity, there's the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. For Tsunamis, there's the Tsunami Intensity Scale. For flooding, rainfall intensity. Just because we are more capable of saving people from these disasters does not mean they are getting better. 2:50 What he is conveniently leaving out is that although hurricanes will become less frequent, extreme hurricanes will become more frequent, meaning that a higher majority of hurricanes will be very intense. On top of this, the numbers he sites are onlyfrom one study. The studies on hurricane frequency due to climate change are very few and have varying results, so his arguments may not even be accurate. 2:59 Even IF less people are dying from natural disasters, the biggest impact is the destruction they do to infrastructure. A hurricane in a developing country like haiti can dessimate their roads, bridges, and structures and cost billions of dollars to repair. The same is true in the US.
@harrisonwintergreen1147
2 жыл бұрын
I'm 1989 the UN predicted climate catastrophe by 2000. Now it's 2021 and we still have 10 years to fix the problem
@marcusaurelius5149
2 жыл бұрын
"Censorship would be if FB tok down his post completely." Wrong. Objectively wrong.
@Rovers1783
2 жыл бұрын
And just like clockwork, KZitem's PRAVDA unit slaps a Wikipedia disclaimer on this video.
@CaliMex96
2 жыл бұрын
Shame Rogan has a cringe audience now. Lol
@ralphholiman7401
2 жыл бұрын
And, just the fact that they are citing Wikipedia as a definitive source, shows you the room temperature IQ group they are putting that up for.
@hollywoodlibertarian
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@ghost2021a
2 жыл бұрын
Can't see it, ad-block's great.
@odawg2255
2 жыл бұрын
I just noticed that how sad
@brett84c
2 жыл бұрын
I love that KZitem gives me a little excerpt underneath this video explaining what climate change is.
@clearmanlawyers753
2 жыл бұрын
You don't see 'excerpt' in the wild very often. Nice.
@TheGhost2612000
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah because wikipedia is the most reliable source of information /s These little excerpts are biased and pushing an agenda, just like the coronavirus excerpt. Maybe if corporations didn't run the government we could trust political figures. However, since money rules the world I will never believe those in power, and will continue to get information from our Father, Mr. Rogan.
@joe1hundred
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheGhost2612000 should’ve put the /s at the end of that statement
@micblades1117
2 жыл бұрын
Propaganda.
@Rodrifuuu
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheGhost2612000 Rogan here has someone that is defending corporations. Neoliberals and fossil fuel companies want governments to stay out of it and not regulate emissions, not fine these megacorps for their decades old lies and bribery. The climate change denial is the neoliberal establishment position.
@nicholasfabiano4725
2 жыл бұрын
Just because less people die from hurricane’s doesn’t mean they aren’t getting worse. I don’t know the science, and can’t say who’s correct, but that’s not a good argument
@TheJibbaholic
2 жыл бұрын
He gave you the numbers. The estimates were 5% stronger and 20/25% less frequent. His point would stand regardless. Our #1 goal should not be to make sure hurricanes do not get stronger. It should be to protect people from those effects. We can do that much more effectively if we tackle climate related issues in a calculated way. Not like it is the only problem we are facing.
@navtektv
2 жыл бұрын
Indeed. I live in Fiji and five years ago Cat 5 Cyclone Winston hit out shores and decimated the entire west in two short hours. It killed 44 people and while that was tragic, the real impact was felt by all that remained as many lost homes and businesses. The power lines were so badly damaged that some towns didn't receive electricity nearly four months after the event. Fiji's primary export is sugar, Winston damaged one of the country's four Mills, located in my town, so badly that it had to be completely demolished costing hundreds of people jobs and seriously hurting the economy enough that we still feel the effects of it today. Hurricanes aren't about the death count, its about the destruction it leaves in its wake.
@jjuhring1
2 жыл бұрын
JRE entire episode 1719 was incredible. I'm a better person for having listened to it. The discussion on homelessness, its possible solutions, and the current political hesitancy to take any meaningful action was mind-opening.
@loturzelrestaurant
2 жыл бұрын
Seen UpisNotJump explain Climate-Change and Hbomberguy Climate-Change-Denial? the 2 Sies of the Coin?
@monotech20.14
Жыл бұрын
This guy is a liar. Ask the people of the FL who had their whole city destroyed if we're getting better at preparing for hurricanes.
@cmmnsenserules4339
Жыл бұрын
@@monotech20.14 Whoaaaaaa, you're straight up calling him a liar?! You're gonna need to back that up.
@mitherapeuticmassage
Жыл бұрын
@@monotech20.14 If he was a liar, they couldn't be asked because they'd be dead. He said that people don't die as much from natural disasters, not that they don't occur and destroy property.
@nickbeaumont2601
2 жыл бұрын
Just because people won't die en masse doesn't mean it's not a serious threat to civilisation. Mass displacement and economic disruption have very real consequences and should be taken very seriously
@Chris-hb6jt
2 жыл бұрын
Then propose a realistic way to deal with it
@baddreams123451
2 жыл бұрын
KZitem links a Wiki article 😂😆😂😆
@moreplease394
2 жыл бұрын
They've been doing that since the election was contested, where have you been?
@AZ2PM
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah cos this guy is well known for pushing bullshit when it comes to climate change. Even here, he says 'natural disasters are not getting worse, deaths from natural disasters have declined over 90%' This statement is completely misleading. He's defining 'worse' by death count, not number, duration or financial cost, all of which are getting worse. This is exactly why Facebook put a warning, because its a narrow definition of 'worse' that neglects the reality and frames it in deaths - which are obviously declining as we have weather mapping and procedures that help us prepare to minimise death. This is why this dude is a joke of a guest and already copped all the criticism he deserved for his cash-grab book.
@davidchester429
2 жыл бұрын
@@AZ2PM no different to Al Gore saying that environmental disasters have got worse due to the monetary value of the damage caused. Everyone was still getting around on horses in the 1900s of course a hurricane is going to be more damaging when a society is more economically developed. As always there is a middle ground here but you do get a lot of alarmists claiming everyone is going to die in less than 100 years. My whole issue with the climate change debate is everyone expects the government to do something. Firstly if its that important do it as an individual first. Secondly what do you expect the government to do? If they do whats needed ie ban cars, flights, international trade, construction, more than 1 child and mass agriculture they will be voted out quicker than we can blink. So what needs to be done?
@TheGhost2612000
2 жыл бұрын
@@davidchester429 The individual can only do so much. The way I see this is, if climate change is such a big problem then manufacturers should be making the change. Make electric vehicles that are not expensive. Make ships run off of water or something else. Have air transportation change their fuel consumption too. So if this is soooo detrimental to our livelihood then why aren't technologies and regulations being put in place yesterday? To me, an idiot, it seems like climate change is being blown out of proportion. I do not trust the government to be truthful to citizens. When money is involved or can be made, corruption is lurking around the corner. Joe should have two climate change people on and have them debate.
@mhz7799
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/pmqhqm18koqdiqA
@Itsamansworld1
2 жыл бұрын
They are treating Joe like a flat earther now?... Settle down KZitem
@ieatfriedpikmin
2 жыл бұрын
Why are you afraid of context? Or do you and Joe just enjoy being a victim? Calm down.
@Itsamansworld1
2 жыл бұрын
@@ieatfriedpikmin y doesn't KZitem put that same context on these people who claim Russian collusion after it has been proven false
@Itsamansworld1
2 жыл бұрын
@@ieatfriedpikmin and what was said in this video that KZitem needed to give their OPINION...Im sure you won't answer that question directly
@Itsamansworld1
2 жыл бұрын
@@ieatfriedpikmin why doesn't KZitem put context on people saying ivermectin as horse medicine when its been prescribed to billions and is used to treat covid in Japan
@Itsamansworld1
2 жыл бұрын
@@ieatfriedpikmin how does it feel to have the emotions and mindset of a woman🤔
@npd6225
2 жыл бұрын
Alarmism is the biggest threat to society. Especially because the majority of society struggle to think for themselves.
@climatecraze
2 жыл бұрын
Ditto. We need to inform others there is no climate crisis ... kzitem.info/news/bejne/pYSb256CanugdnY
@MFK1967
2 жыл бұрын
As Hurricane Ian ravages Florida
@justincox4863
2 жыл бұрын
Joe, I appreciate your show in so many ways. Thanks for always asking the unadulterated question and then getting the answer.
@loturzelrestaurant
2 жыл бұрын
Hbomberguy does it too.
@MCshlthead
Жыл бұрын
didnt ask many unadulterated questions about that cat litter story though. dude is a unadulterated fooool
@josephhertzberg2734
2 жыл бұрын
I have not read his books, but I do appreciate his views on nuclear power. I have several people in my family in the nuclear industry (nuclear engineers(2) and structural engineer in the industry) they have explained the new reactors to me and they are very safe. We need to build new reactors for clean energy for electric cars. It's inevitable that we will do it eventually, but my fellow left of center voters need to educate themselves.
@alexarias5717
2 жыл бұрын
Honestly i feel the same way. It doesn't hurt to invest in renewable resources like solar and wind power
@Bonaccio
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@fredericklehoux7160
2 жыл бұрын
There's never been real argument against nuclear. If you compind every death from nuclear energy, including every accident like Chernobyl and Fukushima. The dead toll is less then 10 000 person. Coal plant kill or agravate cardiovascular conditions in more then a 100 000 people a year. There was never a rational argument against nuclear energy.
@robertj1777
2 жыл бұрын
@@fredericklehoux7160 nuclear waste is a real argument against nuclear 🤷♂️
@fredericklehoux7160
2 жыл бұрын
@@robertj1777 not really though. Some biased anti-nuclear advocate say bullshit like "you don't know if someone in 10 000 yrs won't open our nuclear waste cache after society as collapse. We have to be responsible and not risk future life" this is bogus on so many level and a very big what if. There's already cave in the world, those we first extracted uranium in for example. That are radioactive enough to kill you if you stay in for too long. We can make the same cave for our waste and sleep well at night, at worst it'll kill less then 10 people before they realize this place is curse or something, let's forsake it. We should not avoid the fact that the deadliest isotopes will decay in relatively short period of time too. We know we can make these deposit safe for our society in the near future. The benefit greatly outweight the risk. There's really just bad public opinion against nuclear, no real tangible argument.
@williamthomas5215
2 жыл бұрын
I will say that if you look at records for most powerful storms or highest temps or weather related incidents they’re all from 80+ years ago
@yeahboiii6640
2 жыл бұрын
I always find it funny seeing companies tell you in a commercial how much they care about you or that a food product has "real cheese" in it. Always view life through your peripherals instead of straight ahead. Reality is what it is not what someone else tells you it is.
@joeclaridy
2 жыл бұрын
Funny you say that. I wanted a foreign particular cheese that's made from fresh milk but I can't get it because it's currently under an import ban. But what I can get in absorbently large quantity is Walmart brand knock off made up of ingredients I can't pronounce.
@korbendallas8488
2 жыл бұрын
The irony is corporations are clinical sociopaths. They are incapable of caring. But they are experts in convincing people otherwise.
@mightymodo
2 жыл бұрын
@@korbendallas8488 perfectly stated.
@Rafungilo
2 жыл бұрын
It is made with real cheese. 10% is real cheese while the other 90 is random weird shit. Made with 100% real cheese not “100% real cheese”.
@VincentGonzalezVeg
2 жыл бұрын
@@Rafungilo it's big dairy The same reason why dairy was listed on the food pyramid and the healthy eating thing, my doctor recommended the Canada plate That has no dairy listed Dairy is not a needed nutrition, they're using their money to say that dairy is a needed nutrition And the evils of it I relate to what my dinner with Andre was about
@JackT-7
2 жыл бұрын
“I was censored” “How so” They put a warning label on my link” …..so you weren’t censored…. 🤦🏽♂️
@z.bongerman1062
2 жыл бұрын
Snowflake's always crying about imaginary victimhood.
@justinlavigne9814
2 жыл бұрын
That is a form of censorship. Lmao.
@roundearthshill248
2 жыл бұрын
@@justinlavigne9814 dude there are no varying degrees of censorship. It's either censored or it isn't and I don't believe adding context to controversial claims is censorship. If they had deleted the post entirely, that's censorship.
@justinlavigne9814
2 жыл бұрын
@@roundearthshill248 that is incorrect. Just like " fact checkers " putting a warning on something that they disagree with, even if it's true and is a fact. You make me laugh.
@gregtorseth
2 жыл бұрын
This guest was misleading in his "facts". Not saying he should have been censured, but his thesis is misleading. Agreed that drugs are a massive issue, but can't they both be issues that need to be addressed...it's not one or the other. Losses may be going down in the US, but North America is generally well positioned geographically from the worst effects of climate change. The same can't be said for many other parts of the world. Taking a US-centric view is irresponsible. The costs of natural disasters are skyrocketing. Just take a look at all the wild fires and droughts around the world.
@ifn30
2 жыл бұрын
Really appreciate the Wiki climate change link. Thanks Tube lol.
@taboowriter9229
2 жыл бұрын
Barri weiss is a PoS reporter who built her career on calling anyone who spoke out against israel's apartheid ethno state as a anti semite and trying to cancel them.
@MA-gs9te
2 жыл бұрын
Literally!!! She is the one doing the censoring!!!
@tsyqaib
2 жыл бұрын
How is Isreal an apartheid state with Palestinians living inside Isreal and Palestinian participating in their politics?
@radamrussell
2 жыл бұрын
That moral superiority...it's a helluva drug.
@jackcase119
2 жыл бұрын
Just because less people die, doesn't mean that it correlates to the intensities of the storms increasing or decreasing.
@fupm4531
2 жыл бұрын
I caught that as well. It’s a somewhat simple thought process to it but I see some of his points
@ryangibson609
2 жыл бұрын
I also picked up on that... like no shit we're better at avoiding hurricane deaths than we were a century ago. Populations have greater mobility today than in 1920. Seemed like a dishonest argument.
@24killsequalMOAB
2 жыл бұрын
Slightly more intense, much less frequent
@robertross9567
2 жыл бұрын
I haven’t read his book but based on what he is described, It kind of sounded like Facebook was right to put the warning label. He defended his argument about natural disasters getting worse by using some death statistics about America. Natural disasters and deaths from them are not limited to one country. And claiming we are or aren’t in a mass extinction are both misleading. This should be a conditional statement
@JohnWick-vh2qy
2 жыл бұрын
How's it misleading he is absolutely right. We are no where near a mass extinction of humans. You probably wear a mask while driving and showering
@Bvngum
2 жыл бұрын
For example New York is going to get fucked at the latest when sea level starts to rise high enough. Seems to me that future generations are going to have to deal with a lot of damage worldwide one way or another.
@ImRicWooo
2 жыл бұрын
And theres no way to know if storms are even caused by the climates change. Its been hotter than this before and its been colder than this before. This is the part that is now starting to be accepted that there is some climate change caused by carbon... Ive never seen a scientfic paper making this claim. All I know of is predictions for the future and none of them call it an emergency.
@Bvngum
2 жыл бұрын
@@ImRicWooo Not sure about the cause but I've been living in countryside most of my life & I've noticed quite sudden declining in insect numbers which is worrisome especially when we are talking about pollinators. Tick populations seem to be rising tho. Anywayz... I think you can see a lot of alarming changes when you just open your eyes and senses. You don't need any scientific papers for that. Everything is connected and if something like pollinators start to get extinct it will drastically affect humans too.
@Mrsimking34qc
2 жыл бұрын
His comparaison with death in america was weak and from other comments i've read, he doesn't understand everything he is talking about.... So yeah, facebook was "right" to put the warning label. But tbh, facebook doesn't care about anything but profits...
@captaincarl1
2 жыл бұрын
A warning that says a store disagrees with the scientific accuracy of a book is different from "censorship" ... They are literally still letting him sell his book in their store.
@Ryevin
2 жыл бұрын
Good to see Rob Lowe doing well
@ntn6233
2 жыл бұрын
Ha! I thought the same thing.
@trey8770
2 жыл бұрын
Michael is the best out there for a honest and practical approach to clean energy and the fear mongering of activists
@Kimberly-bu5fe
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@markzuckergecko621
2 жыл бұрын
@@driftlesshermit it's a big damn planet. There's plenty of real estate left. You're being hyperbolic to try and paint him as a loon, but you're only making yourself seem like a loon.
@trey8770
2 жыл бұрын
@@driftlesshermit “functionally extinct” you’re either stupid or one of those weird eco fascists. Probably both, I’m guessing you also want less humans and population control to “save the planet”.
@welcome872
2 жыл бұрын
Joe “that’s not outside the realm of possibility” Rogan
@anthonytorridson5360
2 жыл бұрын
Look up “Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones” It’s too funny!😡 😂
@Bammarjackass
2 жыл бұрын
“99.9% of the studies conducted and peer reviewed on this topic are wrong bro. Now finish your horse paste so we can free think some more.”
@dEcmircEd
2 жыл бұрын
the alarmism is not the studies, it's the headlines. I like people who try to think about solutions without taking the prophet of doom/modern society is all bad approach. no study on climate change advise you to panic that said It's seems using ivermectin to treat COVID is horseshit, even if it's not horse paste.
@barcafan1710
2 жыл бұрын
@@dEcmircEd Yeah but this guy also totally misunderstands the studies. 6% endangered species right now is not at all a refutation that we're at the beginning of a mass extinction. Mass extinctions can last millions of years, but this guy uses just the species in the year 2020 as evidence. If you're gonna say headlines are overblown, fine... but you should back that up with a better interpretation of the science. This guy just spouts one statistic that doesn't mean at all what he says it means.
@jamessgian7691
2 жыл бұрын
“Why is it more attractive?” - because they can say, “Big global government is the only way to deal with this.” As someone who has no need for the new, irrational religions, I haven’t lost my ability to recognize this is all propaganda.
@alvareo92
2 жыл бұрын
Some have no use for the new irrational religions but have very good use for the so-called “fact-based” rational religions that displaced the traditional religions in the enlightenment, like thinking any scientific proof that validates your argument is inherently true and unfalsifiable (just like the existence of God is for believers) and any other that refutes it is flawed. This isn’t necessarily directed at you, but to anyone who thinks they’re completely free of religious worship just because of their rational intellectual nature
@abhinavdangwal6180
2 жыл бұрын
@@alvareo92 Science is not a religion because it keeps improving itself. Studies are discarded all the time. Religions don't do that. Your religion doesn't. Some religions call themselves a philosophy but that too is false because philosophy is far too rigorous a discipline and the questions it asks can only be answered on the basis of reason. In the end, science gave us modern medicine and instant communication. All religion ever did was misinform people and demonize others.
@benyamin7363
2 жыл бұрын
Spot on
@jamesmcgarry1229
2 жыл бұрын
The guy is talking about the impact of climate change on Americans. That’s a very insular viewpoint. The world is a lot bigger than America, and people in poor countries that will suffer more are just as important.
@lamarjackson8630
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/0ZuLzaN3raZ-e34 ⬆️Elon Musk meets Alex Jones! 😂 👽
@EddyMcGuire
2 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Have been to the places you mention particularity in S America. They are doing fine. As a matta fact, a better place to live in many aspects because of fresh organic natural produce growing. They also have old school natural fires that cleanses the environment; not intentionally set for the purpose you talk of. But, put all that aside -- the biggest problem I have with you and your millions of minions, is that not one of you ever EVER mention geoengineering that's been going on for 15+ years and is what actually created this problem and the acceleration of it, and is bought and paid for by the same 1% that control you now - today - with all this other stuff. Wake up---Look up.
@jamesmcgarry1229
2 жыл бұрын
@@EddyMcGuire What??? Droughts and floods are not getting worse around the world? Miami Beach and the Florida Quays will suffer badly from water level rises… along with every other coastal community around the world. But you are saying there is nothing to see here? 😂…. And as regards this geo engineering you mention, cite credible sources (no Fox News 😂) so we can all learn.
@MetalJigRebirth
2 жыл бұрын
Does this guy think America is the entire world?
@CV-fb9kf
2 жыл бұрын
One of those “we can keep fucking the planet up and there’ll be no consequences “ K buddy
@PatrickPierceBateman
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. "Let's totally ignore one problem because this other problem of my choosing is much worse." He's probably bought and paid for by big oil companies.
@Dom-Dom-Dom
2 жыл бұрын
That's not by any means what this guy's saying lol
@yonidellarocha9714
2 жыл бұрын
Why instead of strawmaning his argument don't you steelman his arguments? It would give you some credibility at least. As a biochemical engineer and the former owner of a chemical production and distribution company, I'm much more worried about pollution than co2 levels (as of now, once and if we pass 2000ppm and people start falling asleep on the street while walking, then I'll consider it a bigger problem), specially given how little thought the average person gives to waste disposal. For example, a lot of countries say to dispose of medication by throwing it in the toilet, i see this as a disaster in policy, specially in coastal cities where a lot of the water recirculates several times before being dispersed into the ocean. But i won't focus only on governmental policy or people's idiocy, i also look at the bussiness i was in and think the same as i did back in the 80s when i started: "this is a mess, these people shouldn't be in charge of running these places, they are too irresponsible". Well, what do you know, 2 years later i was getting death threats because their places were being fined. Why? Because the inspectors were used to the disastrous conditions of their production plants, and when i set up a new and properly designed one, the inspectors realized just how low the stardards were and demanded a revamp of most of them. That's one case where the inspectors behaved like they were supposed to, but it usually doesn't happen this way, too much money going into their pockets and a lack of empirical standards to contrast with. To me, deforestation, destruction of habitats, ocean pollution, plastic pollution and particulate pollution are much more pressing issues than CO2 concentration. But sure, let's not focus on the actual contaminants that cause illness and birth defects, let's focus on CO2, something you are producing and every second of your life until you die, without any problem. If you want to be alarmists, that's ok, but at least pick something that is an actual immediate danger, plastics should be the big one, imo. I stopped using them for food in the 90s and can't believe that everything now comes in plastic wrapping, even fruits... I'm going to take an unpopular stance and blame the consumer, i don't buy that shit, but someone does, and that's the money that keeps the plastic flowing.
@karsakasdasfa6474
2 жыл бұрын
@@yonidellarocha9714 why do you think climate change is all about CO2 concentration? It isn't. It is about keeping temprature change below 1.5°C. Also that take on CO2 is like saying you'll treat cancer when it gets to stage 4.
@neworleans75
2 жыл бұрын
Not having access to Facebook isn't censorship. It's a private company. Just as a private building doesn't have to let you in. It's not a public square. Get a podcast ffs. Oh the irony. "I've been censored" says man giving a interview to a channel with over a million subscribers
@huffnbassist8779
2 жыл бұрын
This guy was a great guest. We need voices like him.
@nicholasc6876
2 жыл бұрын
Well i'm alarmed. My State is much warmer than when I was a kid. Way more 90+ degree summers with 70 degree dewpoints. Way more tepid winters with little to no snow. Lots of invasive species I never had to think about before causing rashes. Had to invest in a heat pump to keep up with this shit. Our State's power outages have risen considerably with the wild windy springs and autumn. Our ocean ecology is dwindling and moving further north. I can see it with my own two eyes. I don't need a book to tell me otherwise.
@anangrycat86
2 жыл бұрын
Can someone link me to a pie chart that shows amount of time humans have been round with a percentage of the chart for the time we have measured climate?
@markbrouk7857
2 жыл бұрын
Haha yeah good luck
@shapirasa9472
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/raeBrqybnJ2Zmqw breaking
@juniorballs6025
2 жыл бұрын
They conveniently ignore past warm / cold periods. Everything is cyclical to a degree and I'm really not sure how they think we avert the next glacial period?
@Kimberly-bu5fe
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@mattg2770
2 жыл бұрын
Important to take into consideration the fact that our carbon footprint went way up once the industrial age came
@Theylietous
2 жыл бұрын
This is what I’ve been trying to tell people, climate change is not as serious as it’s being made out to be stats show that the water levels were going to rise and when they do humans will just find somewhere else to live as humans have done since they began walking. Don’t be distracted. There are much more pressing issues needed to be addressed in todays society.
@ardenorcrush649
2 жыл бұрын
It's not a matter of sea level rising, it's a problem of temperatures rising or dropping beyond what is expect for each area, which will disrupt the economic and lifestyle activities in such places. For example, with a rise in temperatures, electrical networks will struggle to keep up as they will overheat sooner and fail, provoking blackouts, a whole lot of public infrastructure would need to be replaced. Harvests can also be ruined due to drought. Same kind of problem if somewhere temperatures would reach below zero suddenly, you can suffer agricultural losses by snow or hailstorms, roads blocked without access to equipment to clear them, pipelines freezing. It's a much wider problem than just a negligible sea-level rise.
@danielmendezmartorell2790
Жыл бұрын
@@ardenorcrush649 why is temperature Rising a problema?
@gabbypenny6884
Жыл бұрын
@@danielmendezmartorell2790 Majority of Storms are created at the equator as they need warm water to produce, the equator is where the Sun hits Earth the most with light and heat. When temps rise, the warm water at the equator will be affected causing larger and more dangerous storms. In addition, hotter temps means more wild fires and droughts. Natural Disasters are just going to get worse and worse.
@guyguy7953
Жыл бұрын
I think people finding somewhere else to live is the problem…
@27STS
2 жыл бұрын
Nah youre right. Nothing to worry about. Everything is fine. Lets just deny science. Yay Texas!
@abdullahiadam3268
2 жыл бұрын
You are the people he is talking about. It is becoming a cult now
@goomyworms3130
2 жыл бұрын
@@abdullahiadam3268 the cult is made up of the people who disagree with the scientific consensus that humans are negatively impacting the climate…
@kevslive
2 жыл бұрын
Scientists have no reason to lie yall on crack thinking climate change isnt a thing
@SuperBlueMoonWA
2 жыл бұрын
@@goomyworms3130 yeah let's get the government to help us. They definitely won't use it as a power grab.
@goomyworms3130
2 жыл бұрын
@@SuperBlueMoonWA you can complain about the government doing things you don’t like, or you can be an active community member, get into local government, advocate for certain politicians/political ideas, etc. That’s how the government works buddy, it’s just members of society who speak (or are supposed to speak) on behalf of their constituents…
@Mediumdoo
2 жыл бұрын
End the failed war on drugs
@aguyfromscotland5552
2 жыл бұрын
Definitely. Drugs have already won the so called "war on drugs”. Where there's demand, there's supply. Basic economics. Addiction has been around for thousands of years and always will be. It's a primal instinct and one of the most powerful one's.
@lexy5065
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@notsure2688
2 жыл бұрын
Need to hunt the cartel instead of calling parents domestic terrorists
@DSQueenie
2 жыл бұрын
“That San Fransicko …” well my brain just turned off. Bye guys.
@VisibilityFoggy
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I prefer "San Franpsycho"
@richrumbaugh7235
2 жыл бұрын
One of your BEST ! Great Job.
@nenmaster5218
2 жыл бұрын
Look at the Denial, rather than the abundanceo f Evidence. Thats tbh even more telling. Hbomberguy and Climate-Town have looked at the People paying to fight the Science and muddy the Water and they look at CAUGHT Lies. I'd argue this is even better to find the truth than looking at the Thing Itself.
@deanatkins4456
2 жыл бұрын
He sounds like a perfectly reasonable and serious guy. I'm going to check out his work.
@sentientflower7891
2 жыл бұрын
He isn't.
@PavelowB99
2 жыл бұрын
@@sentientflower7891 how so?
@sentientflower7891
2 жыл бұрын
@@PavelowB99 he is a known liar and paid shill.
@ANTIStraussian
2 жыл бұрын
@@sentientflower7891 if climate change turns out to be real people are going to be mad at you
@sentientflower7891
2 жыл бұрын
@@ANTIStraussian Climate change is real already. Get an education.
@stevelewza
2 жыл бұрын
He said his statements were mischaracterized by being labelled as misleading, but I think this statement can be a bit misleading if we're being honest: "Natural disasters are not getting worse, deaths from natural disasters have declined over 90% over the last hundred years." Disasters could very well be getting worse, while people are just getting better at dealing with them, it's conflating number of deaths with natural disaster severitity, which is misleading...
@jmerced
2 жыл бұрын
I thought that myself. Although, I think the reason he did that was because they were initially speaking about how much more dangerous certain things are than others and so he sort of just morphed into describing how natural disasters aren't that dangerous.
@agentmulder7608
2 жыл бұрын
I’d like to see him debate a real climatologist like Paul Beckwith or Michael E. Mann.
@lazenbytim
2 жыл бұрын
Who is he anyway? Just a bloke who wrote a couple of books
@stuartbrierley103
2 жыл бұрын
He wouldn't fare very well. A quick Google shows he's playing semantics.
@vishal-singh
2 жыл бұрын
Mass extinction events are not just defined by the percentage lost during an event - this is good for looking at historical events not ongoing events. Species lost per given time is the way to measure ongoing extinction events and the current rates are higher than some the historical events which we now call mass extinction events. This guy has a very human centric approach on looking at the effects of a climate disaster. Saying that the number of deaths are decreasing describes more about increasing resilience by building better infrastructure for ourselves not that the disaster is less severe than before. Counting deaths and measuring infrastructure damage is not the accurate way of determining the severity of a disaster. I don’t like Facebook even a little bit, but I agree with their decision on calling his book as misleading. This person needs to talk to researchers in the field instead of making up his mind after reading stuff on the internet as we all can be biased at times and only like to take information that reinforces our biases.
@willxiv
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for already making one of the points that I was going to type. I agree with Facebook‘s labeling of this book as misleading.
@pronoe
2 жыл бұрын
"The current rates are higher than some the historical events" Source? The climate change issue is a political one. If the issue is so pressing why have we been pestered for years about our lifestyle despite making progress while third world countries are polluting more and more every years and nobody bats an eye. Same goes for ships as soon as they reach international waters. It's all a show. Like this guys said at the beginning, climate change alarmism is just one more thing people use to virtue signal and feel superior to others. We've been told constantly for the past 20+ years that "10 years from now will be the point of no return". Every time there is a heatwave somewhere people scream "cLimATE ChANge". Same thing with flooding, hurricane, ... whatever. It's ridiculous...
@Jerbraska
2 жыл бұрын
@@pronoe ah the “…but third world countries” argument and misrepresenting past comments approach never gets old…
@Chadner
2 жыл бұрын
@@pronoe Right on brother. It's easy to tell what are the real issues and what are the made up ones. If the mainstream media is trying to make you care about something, then it's a non issue with a serious corporate agenda behind it. If they pretend it never happened, then it's something serious that we should definitely be talking about.
@vivekp4854
2 жыл бұрын
@@pronoe I agree third world countries like india and china are pollutiong more. 163 million indians don't have access to drinking water and 13% of indian homes don't have access to electricity. But they have to live without water and electricity since it's going to contribute to climate change. You guys don't need to change your living style like using public transport or using fuel efficient cars or maybe eating less meat. We the developing countries need to stop all development activities to ensure you guys live in comfort.
@tramrant
2 жыл бұрын
'Deaths from natural disasters declined' is exactly the 'misleading' part of this guys narrative. We got better at dealing with natural disasters, that's why there are fewer deaths, not because natural disasters are rarer now. It's like if it used to sprinkle a little and your clothes used to get wet in a slight drizzle of a rain, but now it's actually raining cats and dogs but you take an umbrella with u now. Sure you're dryer now than before cause of the umbrella. But you can't claim: 'see guys, it's raining less now cause I didn't get wet as much' No you doofus, it is raining heavy now, you were just under the umbrella and even that umbrella won't save you when that rain turns into a heavy storm, so you better do something about it now.
@rathelmmc3194
2 жыл бұрын
A natural disaster is defined by its death toll. If less people are dying then natural disasters are less of a concern.
@jacobunderwood4957
2 жыл бұрын
His bit about mass extinctions is flat out fake, too. He said some 6% of currently known species are in danger of becoming extinct. It's actually 1 million species out of the ~1.6 million that science has identified (with an estimated 8.7 million total species, most having not yet been scientifically identified). So his 6%, in reality, is anywhere from ~10% (of estimated species) or ~60% of known species.
@waynedurning8717
2 жыл бұрын
He stated more than once that we’ve become better at dealing with the natural disasters and that’s why they’re less deadly. If you could maybe step back and take a breath maybe you’d hear what he’s trying to say is there are other problems. Bigger problems like deaths from drugs that nobody talks about because the left have done an amazing job once again at focusing everyone’s attention on the least tangible and most emotional problems. The amount of people who die from drugs and the amount of human trafficking that goes on in this country never gets talked about by the left because it’s easier to insight anger against conservatives over climate, racism and sexism.
@waynedurning8717
2 жыл бұрын
@@damien7157 no we Should be talking about drugs AND human trafficking AND obesity AND climate change. I just watched the video again to see if I was letting bias effect my reasoning. I wasn’t. You’re taking one thing he said out of the context of the whole conversation and letting it eclipse everything else he says. First he qualified what he meant - by stating that we have become better at managing natural disasters but also by explaining how science predicts, unfortunately, more severe storms (by 5%) but also less frequent storms (by 25%). AND at 3:38 he even states very clearly that “climate change is real and something should be done about it” and then goes on to lay out his argument for why it just should not be the highest priority. (Practically the only priority) Do you see that you’re ignoring his whole argument because you caught him fudging one point? One which he immediately qualifies. There are a lot of things wrong and a lot of things to fix in this world panic and a myopic world view is not the best approach. Starting with it makes people crazy, it makes people hate and it makes people think they are doing good and making progress as long as they are on the “right” side of one single issue (while those suffering from the other issues are left to themselves) If you knew a good kid who died from fentanyl or a girl who had been abducted and trafficked I imagine climate change would slip from your top spot of priorities and you’d hear this guy’s argument a little different.
@saffaadventures365
2 жыл бұрын
He literally says we are better at dealing with it 😂
@ds8249
2 жыл бұрын
I use to think that narrative that Rogan was a pipeline to the right was goofy, but anymore I’m starting to see it
@al-du6lb
2 жыл бұрын
Stop thinking in black and white terms. What is happening is the left is splitting into two factions.
@ktk44man
2 жыл бұрын
@@al-du6lb what are those two factions?
@ds8249
2 жыл бұрын
@@al-du6lb I don’t really think so my man. This is pretty mainstream right and it seems like that’s Joes general narrative anymore. Could just be my confirmation bias though. I don’t watch as much since he went to Spotify lol
@al-du6lb
2 жыл бұрын
@@ds8249 I also think the right is dealing with similar issues. We are in the middle of a political realignment. There are some people on the left and right which softening up which is great in such a divisive time. It's not that they are become crypto republicans, it's something new. Things are getting shaken up which is a good thing. The standard republican vs democrat crap gets us no where and it's designed to do so.
@ds8249
2 жыл бұрын
@@al-du6lb I’m not so sure about that. I think democrats typically “go out to brunch” when a democrat is in office. I think their narrative isn’t as strong because they are lazy lol I don’t think joe is an indicator of dems softening, this really started after he moved to Texas. He’s probably experiencing cultural and contextual pressures, making him lean a little more to the right. You might be right, but I think my explanation is a little more simplistic than ideologies realigning so quickly within a year. There are a lot of factors in political realignments and I think complicity and laziness fit this narrative better. Again, you could totally be right lol these things are hard to examine until it’s autopsy time. I’m siding with what I think Occam‘s razor would say.
@jasonleech1254
2 жыл бұрын
Alex Jones will be on episode 1776. I fucking guarantee
@shapirasa9472
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/raeBrqybnJ2ZmqyW
@Kimberly-bu5fe
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@RagnarLothbrok2222
2 жыл бұрын
God I hope so
@neilpearce
2 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure some "open" scientists found out it's not just the planet heating up, but the whole solar system is. It's cyclical and was even hotter here 2000 years ago than today. We can't prevent it, we need to adapt to it.
@lana0069
2 жыл бұрын
👋👋👋👋
@loturzelrestaurant
2 жыл бұрын
@@lana0069 You applaud a pseudoscience-comment?
@bcdd8
2 жыл бұрын
I watched a program on the discovery Channel. This has happened before.... it's the earth cycle. Way before our time.
@ClyeRandom
2 жыл бұрын
Does Michael realise that there are other people living on the planet than Americans who have less money to protect from natural disasters? Just a thought.
@Gatorraider
2 жыл бұрын
As soon as this dude started sticking up for soros......yeah...I wouldn't trust him for a second.
@S.J.L
2 жыл бұрын
Ok, Fuck Soros and the W.E.F., etc...yeah? But we have to be welcoming to disenfranchised democrats, who are trying to find sanity...how else will you build? Most people have been wrong or mislead at some point.
@DissTrackTed
2 жыл бұрын
@@S.J.L 🤦♂️
@S.J.L
2 жыл бұрын
@@DissTrackTed How's your dad?
@OceanofMaya
2 жыл бұрын
ROFL. Are you familiar with Koch industries?
@100ghillie
2 жыл бұрын
@@OceanofMaya deeper, black rock industries owns everything.. the puppet masters if you will
@JupiterTarts
2 жыл бұрын
1. Just because the drug crisis is a threat doesn't mean that society can't work on them both simultaneously. They're two different problems entirely. 2. Just because humanity is better at dealing with weather changes doesn't mean it's not getting worse. One day, humanity might not be able to build around what nature is throwing at it. 3. If man-made climate change is whats causing hurricanes to increase in intensity despite being less frequent, that's worse than we had before. Infrastructure and people can withstand a few frequent small hurricanes per year. People can't withstand their homes being flooded or blown over every 4 or 5.
@a.m.4090
2 жыл бұрын
1. If that was true, society would invest proportionately to the lives lost to the crisis. Currently, the amount of attention/resources to the lesser problem (in terms of lives lost) far outweights the investment in greater problem. 2. If humanity isn`t able to build around what nature is throwing at us, it`s game over. The resources needed to alter the whole planetary climate to be human-friendly would be far greater, then resources needed to adjust to changes to local climate changes. If you can`t afford the latter, it would be impossible to afford the former. 3. If man-made climate change isn`t causing hurricanes to increase in intensity, then it`s not a problem.
@gbxgbxgbx
8 ай бұрын
You either go with science or not. If you're not with science, you have a "different opinion" than science - you're wrong. Is the subject of global warming "politicized"? Yes. Guess what, every big issue that needs to be solved and requires big amounts of resources from taxpayers, will need to be "politicized" in order to be solved. Because that's how you organize money to solve big issues. No other way. If the right wing doesn't understand science than what can we do about it? There will always be room for opposite politicians simply because it's lucrative, no matter how dumb unscientific their beliefs, politicians will go there, like the right wingers do - for the money. Since there is public to hear them willingly.
@danielmcdougall8388
3 ай бұрын
Scientists are censored and vilified for challenging climate change. They have more to lose challenging climate change. There is way more money to be made supporting climate change than challenging it. To say they do it fit money proves you know nothing. It’s not having a “different opinion”. It’s wanting to see a debate between real scientists. Blaming right wing proves you are not interested in debate, you have been gaslighted in to believing. Which is where shellenberger is 100% correct. Climate change is the new modern day religion, you believe. You don’t support scientific facts, you support science that validates your belief.
@TheLogicalKey
2 жыл бұрын
Fear and guilt are the best ways to control people. Make them fear a climate apocalypse while feeling like their lifestyle is the cause.
@JL_Lux
2 жыл бұрын
Just say you don’t fully understand climate change and leave
@Pistolita221
2 жыл бұрын
Truth! what got us here were the unilateral decisions made by the chemical, oil, auto, and insurance industries that decided our manufacturing, transportation and agriculture. If we focused the climate conversation on these people with trillions of dollars sitting there, waiting to be invested into new manufacturing, energy and transit we would employ millions with meaningful jobs, defend against crop shortages and property damage and improve society as a whole, with the new transportation tech. HSR would totally revolutionize the US economy.
@AlwaysHereAndNow
2 жыл бұрын
I'm so grateful I discovered this author on your show! My partner is now reading his book and we are learning so much.
@abhinavdangwal6180
2 жыл бұрын
How about reading a book on climate science too? Not propaganda like this but an actual textbook.
@DennisMcCoy-b2r
2 жыл бұрын
@@abhinavdangwal6180 Yes, saying that the world is getting warmer and climate is changing is propaganda unless you add every scary speculation you can think of and remind people that the educated believe it and the stupid and insane don't
@mayankdewli1010
2 жыл бұрын
@@abhinavdangwal6180 don't preach. Didn't you listen to what he said ? It's not going to kill 70 k Americans. There's no actual science behind this. No one can predict the climate over next 20 years
@godisnowhere8017
Жыл бұрын
@@abhinavdangwal6180 ut oh. Sounds like someone didn’t even listen to the clip 😬
@WouldYouKindly741
2 жыл бұрын
I can't help but feel like this guy doesn't have the first clue what he's talking about. Climate scientists aren't immediately concerned with human deaths and they never were. If you're presenting your argument against "alarmism" by saying that not that many humans are going to die within the next thirty years nearly every single scientist will agree with you. Even in some of our predicted worst scenarios it still won't directly amount to temperature or disaster related deaths. But what about agricultural economies? What about coastal fish harvesting economies? The US military predicted a total of 100B in damages from rising sea water to our naval bases by 2050. Agriculture is ALREADY extremely expensive and heavily subsidized. Global population is only going to keep increasing and as it stands there isn't a single nation on this planet that has developed large scale agricultural production without emitting large amounts of GHG. The economic consequences of this problem are going to catch up with us far sooner than anything else.
@WouldYouKindly741
2 жыл бұрын
@@savagereality5622 You skeptics always think you're making such a profound point with this rich environmentalist argument. We've had concrete proof that cigarettes cause cancer and severe complications later in life and yet people still choose to smoke anyway. This back and forth has happened with every single environmental concern in the past 50 years. Sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide isn't causing acid rain! Chlorofluorocarbons aren't punching a hole through the ozone! Oh wait turns out they are but we'll never find a way to deal with it cost effectively! Oh wait we found a way to deal with it cost effectively once we were actually forced to!
@realityhittingme
2 жыл бұрын
I disagree that agricultural products are expensive. If people buy fresh produce from the grocery store, dry rice, dry beans, etc.. You can live and eat for pretty damn cheap. I think clean water and proper waste disposal is a bigger issue than air pollution but there are plenty of problems we need to solve. I think mono culture at an industrial level will lead to environmental consequences but also has led to cheap food etc... I think the problem is people are alarmists instead of just showing and solving problems.
@WouldYouKindly741
2 жыл бұрын
@@savagereality5622 I'd suggest reading "Evaluating the Performance of Past Climate Model Projections" by Hausfather et al. if you want a detailed explanation of climate models and their accuracy. The short version is that slightly over half of some of the most well cited models were accurate within their expected error range. Hansen's 1988 model is one of the most interesting as it is often used by Fox and deniers to indicate how inaccurate models can be. However they almost always omit scenario B and C and choose only to reference scenario A which was considered to be the worst case scenario model. I hate to be rude and make assumptions here but between your comments on Al Gore, climate changing naturally, and models not being accurate I can't help but feel like I'm arguing with Fox news and Prager U talking points rather than someone that's actually read a study concerning climate change.
@WouldYouKindly741
2 жыл бұрын
@@realityhittingme As I said it is one of the most heavily subsidized industries in the US. So yes it looks cheap in a store but the reality of the situation is that maintaining and growing crops is extremely expensive and difficult to do. If it wasn't the farming industry wouldn't get billions of dollars every year.
@WouldYouKindly741
2 жыл бұрын
@@savagereality5622 So the totality of your argument is that all of the information I've given thus far which was provided by individuals that have spent years in their respective fields is void and null. All because another single individual has written books that aren't peer reviewed or held to the same degree of academic integrity as published scholarly articles? Just about the only thing this guy and I agree with is that eventually we need to switch to nuclear power. His opinion about climate change not worsening wildfires and disaster events is exactly that, opinion. And don't tell me that you honestly believe that peer reviewed articles are fake news and then look to a single publishing author as the source of all your "well informed" opinions.
@aidancottrell-boyce5648
2 жыл бұрын
It's frightening how easy this guy's arguments are to dismantle. And Joe just lets them go.
@cheechvda
2 жыл бұрын
Care to give an example?
@patrickedwards5967
2 жыл бұрын
Don’t confuse opinions for ‘true facts’ y’all
@luuul5254
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@Bonaccio
2 жыл бұрын
Most popular President ever! 😂😂😂 kzitem.info/news/bejne/xpqiuGd_onp-iIo
@sgcraig2430
2 жыл бұрын
Michaels argument has a lot of flaws in it
@p51abc
2 жыл бұрын
How...? Be specific.
@sgcraig2430
2 жыл бұрын
@@p51abc For one he only focused on the low death toll from natural disasters………“in the United States”. He completely ignored increases in wildfires, droughts, the melting of the ice sheets and the eventuality that many of our coastal cities will cease to exist. Plus I don’t think that he realizes that there is a world outside of the United States, and many other countries are going to be/are being hit way harder than Us. The facts simply don’t fit his narrative.
@p51abc
2 жыл бұрын
@@sgcraig2430 So your attempts to quantify disasters that haven't happened yet in the future are "facts"? He's right, the amount of natural disasters are not increasing, this is a fact. Please look for the facts on their own merits, not to fit your narrative.
@kathrynmercier4874
2 жыл бұрын
@@p51abc He’s straight up incorrect about the definition of mass extinctions, which made me raise an eyebrow. His statement on the numbers of fires decreasing is very misleading because his statistic includes man-made fires for agricultural purposes, which has decreased, but wildfires have not decreased.
@p51abc
2 жыл бұрын
@@kathrynmercier4874 Fair enough, I'm not really concerned about about the semantics of mass extinctions though as the cause is not so lucid. Some of the issues that we have are that extinctions cannot be assumed to be solely caused by climate change. I was recently in South Africa and saw a poached Rhino carcass... this has nothing to do with climate change and everthing to do with Chinese erections. As human populations increase (particularly in 3rd world countries), we will see most animal populations decrease, and this isn't necessarily because of climate change. Conversely, as for the wildfires, as our populations and habitated areas increase, the number of fires will also increase. We cannot make the assumption there is a climate change causation to an increase in wildfires-- Correlation does not imply causation. But, we can make an intelligent case that, as droughts increase from climate change, this also contributes to an increase in fires. But, you would be hard pressed to leave out increased populations and habitat spread as an important contributing factor, not related to climate change, for fires. A case can be made that the most rapidly exploding populations (those of third world countries) are fueling wildfires and diminishing animal populations much more so than climate change. But nobody wants to tell third world countries that they should control their populations, the left would be screaming racism....
@sicknado
2 жыл бұрын
"We didn't get off easy. The proper role of intelligence in a planetary species is that of gardener, caretaker." - Terence McKenna
@PapaEmeritusII
2 жыл бұрын
Good luck with that quote applied to china, india and many other countries that don't give a fuck
@jlmur54
2 жыл бұрын
"And we've got to get ourselves back to the garden." Joni Mitchell--Woodstock
@ktcarl
2 жыл бұрын
Are you sure you didn't get that quote from Chauncy Gardner in the film 'Being There'? JK
@unclebob7937
2 жыл бұрын
@@jlmur54 Damn right! 👍😎✌
@MarkHicks326
2 жыл бұрын
Didn't vote for him...
@postive-vibes
2 жыл бұрын
We're better at dealing with catastrophes, but that doesn't mean that extreme climate events aren't happening in greater frequency.
@foxooo
2 жыл бұрын
Love how joe doesn't challenge this guy at all.
@postive-vibes
2 жыл бұрын
@@foxooo No doubt. I see this not only with him but with many journalists too. It would be really great to hear incisive debate that could ferret out inconsistencies, etc. We'd actually learn more IMO.
@presceltolives2076
2 жыл бұрын
He doesn’t need to challenge him because he’s speaking common sense. It’s only you leftists pansies that want to blow smoke about the “science” behind the climate change “crisis”
@deanfowles3707
2 жыл бұрын
@@foxooo its because joe at this stage is just in it for the $$$$$$$$$$ and he knows who his audience are so of course hes not gonna push back.
@deanfowles3707
2 жыл бұрын
@@presceltolives2076 the one and only good thing about climate change is that people like you and everyone you love are going to suffer immeasurably just like the rest of us.
@phillheth
2 жыл бұрын
Can someone please define wokeism. Because as far as I can tell, all it means is; things people I don't like believe.
@currybumjenkins5428
2 жыл бұрын
sanctimonious, authoritarian twaddle based on outdated post-modern thinkers that idiots share to get a dopamine rush on social media
@psychegoddessoflight9358
2 жыл бұрын
Currybum Jenkins nice
@Boa796
2 жыл бұрын
It's difficult to actually define because it fits many topics but simply put: The rejection of ANY narrative, factual or not, apart from narrowly defined sanctimonious progressive narratives that are based on fringe case statistics only and whom do not consider the overall consequences of running a country or the world. (Think cops killing black people when most black people die from other black people or Climate alarmism when there's stuff right now killing way more people like the North Korean and Chinese dictatorships)
@psychegoddessoflight9358
2 жыл бұрын
People with a limited or misinformed perspective of history who've been misled into a worldview deliberately crafted for them, which hinges on fostering social division under the guise of humanism. Often adopted by those severely lacking in self awareness, who lean toward authoritarianism and end up promoting the very things they claim to be against (hypocrisy). People with fragile egos who can't bear to be proven wrong (i.e., the hallmark of narcissism), so will fly into rage or sulking tantrum when faced with evidence that counters their preconceived beliefs. Usually the result of unresolved trauma; their unacknowledged shortcomings & flaws are instead projected out onto everyone else (e.g., closet racists pointing fingers at others as deflection).
@phillheth
2 жыл бұрын
@@Boa796 Amazin'
@chiphenderson5213
2 жыл бұрын
"Natural disasters are not getting worse, we're just better at dealing with hurricanes and floods." This quote is what's misleading, both of those statements can be true. Natural disasters are ticking up in strength, we are better at dealing with natural disasters due to modern technology.
@chiphenderson5213
2 жыл бұрын
@Meech LOL, and that's where we're at with comprehension in the US in 2021.
@janinemcmahon218
2 жыл бұрын
Not for long. Will the oil industry allow more hydrogen vehicles in more States? They’ll destroy the stratosphere before they let those effect their pocket books
@babbakbukkak6515
2 жыл бұрын
So by all measurements natural disasters aren't worse, "they just could be worse if we didn't have experience in handling them". Doubt.
@chiphenderson5213
2 жыл бұрын
@@babbakbukkak6515 No, by all measurements they are worse. 9 of the 10 lowest pressures (for people that don't know pressure correlates to strength of a system) happened in the last 25 years. They're getting stronger, we're also better at handling them. Both statements are true, and one doesn't have a correlation to another.
@babbakbukkak6515
2 жыл бұрын
@@chiphenderson5213 So it's stronger but it's not worse because it's not as bad for us. You do realize climate must change, we can't have the same weather every year.
@Nasengold
2 жыл бұрын
If you are smart and get the hang of things, you will realize that these warnings from Facebook and KZitem always protect financial interests. There is tons of misinformation no one gives a crap about.
@father3dollarbill
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@patriciapalmer1377
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Incisive. Intelligent. Common sense. The consensus of most Americans.
@ninjaswordtothehead
2 жыл бұрын
If people in charge cared about the climate, they'd ban personal jets, multiple 1000+ sq. feet per person homes, and other massively inefficient uses of fossil fuels. No, it's always us little guys that need to make some massive lifestyle change so they are not slightly inconvenienced. Kinda hard to convince me to walk or worry about sea level when I drive a tiny, efficient car for about 15 minutes a day and you're flying across the country, for the second time this week, in your own jet to your beachfront mansion.
@barackblows1942
Жыл бұрын
We can always pray that their private jets will run out of fossil fuels and crash. 🛩💥🔥☠️
@freedomruss
Жыл бұрын
15 minute cities will keep you in your carbon bubble so the elites can continue to party like it's 1999. 🤷♂️
@paulfroelich1024
2 жыл бұрын
"I care more is total bullshit" Thomas Sowell has entered the chat
@B3DLAMMUSIC
2 жыл бұрын
What the hell happened to you joe? Watching you grill alex jones on his climate change denial was so awesome. How could you sit here and validate this modern day denial?
@johnpacheco1810
2 жыл бұрын
@@yeoooo I think that’s what he means
@trashaccount5106
Жыл бұрын
At 2:00, the only right thing to do as a host is say "So you weren't censored, you published unfounded claims and your post got tagged as containing misleading information?", then take the interview off air and only release the parts of it that aren't bullshit. What a drama seeker.
@jirace
2 жыл бұрын
Wasn't this the guy promoting nuclear on TED Talks? I actually liked his videos, but now we have solar and wind being far cheaper and nuclear requiring huge, ballooning upfront costs to build, besides the dangers, so it just seems like nuclear isn't necessary, but I'm not opposed to nuclear. On climate change: the costs associated with climate change, and the deaths are inaccurately represented when he only talks about hurricanes; he is cherrypicking. We would need to look at the risk of floods, the risk of fires, the rates of heat stroke, the damage to infrastructure, the deaths from famine or from water shortages, etc. Look at Lake Mead and consider the ramifications on hydro power and water for homes, businesses and crops if that dried up. Arizona had a heat wave that melted fences and trash can and caused the paint on street signs to melt and run. We are totally not prepared or well adapted for the extremes. In fact, some would attribute the advancement of the modern civilization over the last ten thousand, plus years as being possible because we had climate stability, but we are ruining that fast. Even if someone said they didn't buy into climate change, what do they believe will be the outcome of living unsustainably? Do they believe we can continue to pollute the environment forever, continue to propagate the population without control, continue to use up the natural resources forever, continue to deplete the forests and fish populations, etc? If we can't find a way to live sustainably then we will eventually deplete the planet's resources or alter the environment enough that it isn't conducive to life, or we will kill each other for resources. All of these outcomes aren't good for us. The planet will go on without us, unless we do something that is permanent like some greenhouse effect, but again, the planet will exist without us, but it seems like if this path is avoidable then it is worth pursuing.
@alexanderamann4602
2 жыл бұрын
Right on 👌
@matrix3509
2 жыл бұрын
Wind and solar isn't even close to being viable unless you want the entire fucking planet covered in solar panels and turbines to counter their intermittent and unreliable nature. We could have solved the "climate crisis" 30 years ago if we had actually invested in next generation nuclear reactors that are far cheaper and passively safe. Nuclear is, was, and will forever remain the only realistic solution to climate change. Everyone with actual knowledge of the issue knows this, and the fact that every climate alarmist absolutely refuses to acknowledge nuclear power shows everyone with a brain how much the alarmists actually believe in climate change.
@monash4250
2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear is the only option for mankind going forward. Wind & solar r merely bandaids and patches. They can barely meet a fraction of the entire human race energy needs, especially in the future and their environmental impact is worse. I suggest u watch some very interesting videos on KZitem and read some research articles on the internet that actually prove how nuclear is the better and only option. The so-called dangers of nuclear energy are over exaggerated and misunderstood. Nuclear is in fact the safest & cleanest option when done right.
@thomaswiens3037
2 жыл бұрын
this dude forgot the whole world was on fire a couple months ago
@ОлесяМэп-ф2г
2 жыл бұрын
They should put a warning saying this contains misleading information everytime a politician talks
@baileybowman2449
2 жыл бұрын
THE WHOLE WORLD? There were more wild fires 🔥 and higher temperatures 150, 100, and 50 years ago in California. Research for yourself instead of blindly believing everything you hear.
@Rodrifuuu
2 жыл бұрын
I've been giving Joe the benefit of the doubt for a long time but now he gives platform to professional climate change deniers? (Pretending that he believes in it but thinks it's not a big deal still makes him a denier). He's saying there's no Holocene extinction and his defense is that ONLY 6% of species are endangered? That's the estimated number for extinction of large animals, which doesn't take into account all the microorganisms that are endangered due to climate change, including all shell-making organisms, including diatoms, that will likely suffer if the ocean continues to acidify. And the mass extinction CONSENSUS takes into account the loss of biodiversity at an annual rate, which is happening at annual rates estimated to only happen during mass extinction events. That's why scientists say it's happening, it's because IT'S ACTUALLY HAPPENING. Imagine the hubris in pretending that burning the equivalent of hundreds of millions of years of sedimentation of organic matter in less than 200 years has no impact on the planet. Imagine seeing CO2 levels jump in less than 100 years to levels not seen since AT LEAST 2 million years ago and saying that this is not an issue? There is more than enough evidence showing that climate change will be catastrophic. The number of Americans that he quotes are in danger of dying from climate change is low, he says, while citing only the number of people estimated to die from weather events. Then he conveniently ignores that climate change is already causing droughts, which will get much worse in the next 20-30 years. Droughts lead to famines. Famines lead to mass migration and wars. That's where most of the mortality will come from. And this guy thinks in such simplistic terms that he can't even grasp the consequences of a messed up climate. It's like when Shapiro suggested that people living in low altitude coasts can just sell their homes when the sea level rises - it takes such a tremendous amount of either stupidity or disingenuity to make such a flawed statement. Pretending that 97%+ of climate scientists are in some sort of religious cult? Go ---- yourself. Shame on you Joe. The least you can do is have an actual climate expert now.
@lovelife2062
2 жыл бұрын
what a rubbish rant. planet is self sustainable . We live in the stabilist environment the planet has ever been. Enjoy your life before you die
@Rodrifuuu
2 жыл бұрын
@@lovelife2062 "Stabilist" is not a word and even if it was it would be misspelled. You have no idea what you are talking about. I'm a biologist and got a PhD in a department with top climate scientists. So feel free to explain why the climate is stable when all research shows that temperatures are increasing and the weather is becoming more and more chaotic.
@lovelife2062
2 жыл бұрын
@@Rodrifuuu your an alarmist thats all I need to know 🙂 enjoy your life
@Rodrifuuu
2 жыл бұрын
@@lovelife2062 Yes, because we're in an emergency. Hopefully you're too old to see the consequences of doing nothing (which is exactly what we're doing right now).
@sluggieify
2 жыл бұрын
@@Rodrifuuu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@remyruff
Жыл бұрын
He is still right on today.
@Unclewalnut
2 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that feels this guy is completely missing the point of climate change? Looking at the natural disaster deaths in 2021 is such a near-sighted deflection of the actual concern which is the irreversible destruction of our planet, habitats, resources, and food systems. Looking at the "now" is not appropriate when the real issue is 50, 100, or even 200 years down the road.
@tommygsgamingchannel
2 жыл бұрын
I think an important consideration for this how accurate the predictions are. The predictions are dire. However, the predictions aren't new. Experts have been making predictions for many decades. It's important to compare predictions that have been made, where the deadlines have already passed, and compare the prediction to the actual, real result. If they are close, then those making the predictions are to be believed. If they are way off, then it's clear we're dealing with a different phenomenon. For example, if a climate scientist made a prediction in the late 1980s that sea level would rise by nearly 9 feet, submerging most of lower Manhattan by the year 2018, while the actual sea level rise turned out to be around 3 centimeters for that term, it would suggest that the scientist really didn't understand what they were talking about, or that they may have been seeking to illicit a specific response independent of reality.
@itsrogo1550
2 жыл бұрын
Joe “come on down if your banned for anything” rogan
@BuddyLee23
2 жыл бұрын
Giving a voice to those now more voiceless.
@dazeng4633
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah... because conformists are just SOOOO cool
@Tpainactual
2 жыл бұрын
@@dazeng4633 all my punk friends growing up are now extremely pro government, ss long as it's Democrat. I don't understand it.
@flacornmallrat
2 жыл бұрын
@@Tpainactual why do people think that punks are anything but irresponsible posers? Drinking in public and looking weird doesn't make you a rebel.
@Tpainactual
2 жыл бұрын
@@flacornmallrat you are an irresponsible poser
@smirkingdevil
2 жыл бұрын
I love the “context” label KZitem felt was necessary for this video.
@nahikoroad
2 жыл бұрын
Yes very Ironic!
@jd3jefferson556
2 жыл бұрын
Irony at its finest
@dragospahontu
2 жыл бұрын
@@jd3jefferson556 exactly
@barrett8788
2 жыл бұрын
Me too. Because this guy is paid by the oil companies. He's a shill.
@messergabel
2 жыл бұрын
@@barrett8788 proof?
@marx2146
Жыл бұрын
The context is a complete lie, extreme far left propaganda from KZitem for putting that up
Пікірлер: 8 М.