"WTF are you? HIGH?" Michi thats what ive been asking ever since you started talking.
@chriskwakernaat2328
4 ай бұрын
sometimes she is , sometimes she's not.
@somerandomguy7100
4 ай бұрын
Schrodinger’s zooted
@tbk2010
3 ай бұрын
"Old people are 4D" Yes Michi. I just turned 40 and suddenly I had an extra dimension that wasn't there before...
@bananaraptor7747
3 ай бұрын
the joint dimension
@Ghost_Embers
Ай бұрын
Well yeah the random pain. 😅
@lonepigeon68
26 күн бұрын
@@bananaraptor7747 bit do the joints help with joint pain?
@maissthro3645
4 ай бұрын
Man... She ended up like a stereotype of a Florida surfer: "woooooaaaahhhh... That's sssoooo deeeep, bruh..."
@Sergei_WHY
4 ай бұрын
Michi getting casually mindblown while trying to make sense of science and philosophy is my favorite thing. Toaster did a great job feeding into that bit, at the low cost of some of his sanity.
@edgaratio
4 ай бұрын
Some things just never change. Water flows, fire burns, and Michi doesn't understand semi common knowledge.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
but then comes the sciencey stuff like how the chemical reaction that is fire also produces water and you can make things colder using sound.
@NekuraKero
4 ай бұрын
@@ghostagent3552 whaaaaat
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
@@NekuraKero CH4+2O2=CO2+2H2O. Aka hydrocarbons combusting in rooms with oxygen will give you carbon dioxide and water. Anyways, watch NighthawksInLight's video on acoustic refrigeration for the sound thing or some vids about how we can make the JWST so cold and you'll also get the same info on that.
@Bloddrake
4 ай бұрын
Look the Theseus's Paradox might be semi common knowledge to us in the west, butt i actually find it reasonable that a mid 20? Indonesian woman have never heard of a nearly 1900 year old Greek thought experiment.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
@@Bloddrake it just means that she's not chronically online like us
@jacobbesler3214
4 ай бұрын
This was a ride, going through the different topics. Ship of Theseus - she's cooking Color and reflectivity - she might be cooking too hard Multiple dimensions - Michi, turn off the stove
@gravelhs
4 ай бұрын
I died at old people part, it's so funny to see how every breakthrough leads to another wall
@jamesvivian2855
4 ай бұрын
Time being the fourth dimension is demonstrably real from time dilation occurring at high speeds
@alchemicpink2392
3 ай бұрын
And also when calculating what the gravitational influences of celestial bodies are sometimes space falls out of the equation but time stays.
@ryanpennington9592
3 ай бұрын
There are physicists working on both timeless and spaceless physics, trying to show that both space and time have no independent existence and merely emerge from deeper physical laws.
@ParadiseDB7
3 ай бұрын
Not how dimensions work and also that debunks it being the 4th. Also... time exists for 2D objects as well. And 1D.
@sergiudana8716
4 ай бұрын
Show Michi Imaginary numbers that'll be fun
@chiichan3774
4 ай бұрын
Tho I have to argue that all numbers are imaginary, as they only exist in our minds.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
Hamiltonians and 3d+ matrixes would be even more fun if people could actually teach her that.
@Grassie_D9938
3 ай бұрын
Oh yeah don't forget about chaos theory, it gets chaotic
@sandhiwistara9128
4 ай бұрын
Toaster : What is color ? Michi : I don't know I color Blind *end credit*
@rowdeemunkee
4 ай бұрын
We should show her that "scale of the universe" video.
@Spedatr0n
4 ай бұрын
That’d be interesting!
@Feanor1988bis
3 ай бұрын
Trying to explain her that when you look at an object you are technically looking at how it was a certain time in the past would be funny too.
@aizero-ih3uy
3 ай бұрын
espescially from metaball studios for that massive zoom out scaling
@Sergei_WHY
3 ай бұрын
After that, maybe we can move on to PBS Space Time. Perhaps after some Kurzgesagt to ease her in a bit.
@volbla
3 ай бұрын
The powers of 10? That's a bloody classic.
@shingshongshamalama
4 ай бұрын
The way she pronounces the word "philosophical" is the funniest thing in this video.
@chriskwakernaat2328
4 ай бұрын
wait till she figures out that everything in space is falling , and being weightless in space , just means you are falling at the same speed..
@edmg7
4 ай бұрын
Is that mind-blowing? I mean, I guess it doesn’t surprise me since I learned that’s what being “weightless” is back in fourth grade science.
@Edino_Chattino
4 ай бұрын
@@edmg7you'd be amazed how many people can't grasp this concept
@Gnulcho
4 ай бұрын
If you're talking about orbiting around the Earth, it's technically drifting away at the same speed you're attracted due to gravity. Once you get enough distance to any massive body, you're no longer falling, but everything will distance itself (technically it's the expansion of empty space, rather than physically moving iirc) from you in an ever increasing speed, until at one point it becomes physically impossible to get back, even with lightspeed (which ultimately causes the heat death of the universe). Well, that is how I understand relativity, which may be wrong. To clarify: As in I might not understand relativity correctly, not that relativity is wrong.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
But also falling doesn't really exist, the paths merely converge and bent to a point at the center of gravity. ScienceClic made a really good animation for spacetime curvature in proper 3d model (not bent 2d sheet)
@NekuraKero
4 ай бұрын
Wdym by everything is falling ? Falling only exists when gravity exists ?
@santiagolopezmedina5980
4 ай бұрын
Good to see Michi embraced absurdism at the end of her existencial crisis.
@lonelystrategos
4 ай бұрын
The hypercube is fun, but Time Cube is where it's really at.
@MiishaKorvian
3 ай бұрын
"SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE" o7
@somedudewatchintv5297
4 ай бұрын
I always like it when Michi gets taught science. I remember when she was taught the difference between air and oxygen.
@vehlinge
3 ай бұрын
My personal favorite existential crisis/“that’s deep dude” thought exercise: describe what nothing is 😂
@DakkaBert
3 ай бұрын
i refuse. problem solved.
@vehlinge
3 ай бұрын
@@DakkaBert either intentionally or not that accomplishes the task too lol
@bengrogan9710
4 ай бұрын
The differeential is if you are able to interact with the dimension A 2nd object can willing interact with the 2 dimensions - it exists in the 3d, but it cannot willingly change A 3 directional being can move willingly in 3 axis - but on the axis of time we are only in the present Time a 4th dimensional being is able to alter its position in the axis of time
@Vanlifecrisis
3 ай бұрын
Yea, you can think of dimensions as constraints. A 3d object is constrained from controlled movement on the fourth.
@friskdremeurluck7907
4 ай бұрын
Kinda wanna see michi super medicated with a super medicated mouse.
@The.Mr.JBiggs
3 ай бұрын
9:15 unless you meet Zen, Haruka or Matara than you hit the Double D dimension
@lemur6435
4 ай бұрын
the hypercube part killed me this was too funny
@immortal_shrooms6757
4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: shrimp colours don't exist, they have more colour bits in their eyes but for individual colours, while humans have less colour bits but are able to mix colours
@Lord_Marquaad
4 ай бұрын
So they see like a compressed color spectrum?
@shingshongshamalama
4 ай бұрын
That's not how anything works. We don't "mix colours." Our brains simply assign what we call colours to various different of the red, green, and blue wavelengths defined by what each of our different cone cells detect. When an object you're looking at has a mixture rather than just one, that's what you see. If a shrimp looked at something that stimulated multiple different colour receptors at once, it would still see a combination of those individual wavelengths as well.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
@@shingshongshamalamaif you think about it, all the vision we perceive is just a biological fourier wave conversion
@toospooky051
3 ай бұрын
It's not an accurate metaphor but I like to think of it as the difference between standard definition and ultra high definition. A human 's and their cones can see at 720p, but a shrimp's eyes can see at 8k
@LumiLunar
4 ай бұрын
Am I still the ship? 💀
@0ldgrumpyman
3 ай бұрын
Wait till she finds out that we are all 11 dimensional, but only perceive 4.
@ParadiseDB7
3 ай бұрын
Literally in the video bud
@ParadiseDB7
3 ай бұрын
And we can only perceive 2 dimensions
@0ldgrumpyman
3 ай бұрын
@@ParadiseDB7 You don't have depth perception? Also she knows there are other dimensions, but I don't see here realizing that all matter has all the dimensions.
@ParadiseDB7
3 ай бұрын
@@0ldgrumpyman oh sorry bud didn't realize you were an alien with freaky non human eyes. No bud, all humans, you included, perceive the world in 2D
@ParadiseDB7
3 ай бұрын
@@0ldgrumpyman all humans, you included bud, perceive the world in 2D
@bekfastlegend2715
4 ай бұрын
I’m going to butcher this explanation but an example I learned about the fourth dimension was to imagine someone was trapped in a three dimensional cage, if the person was in the fourth dimension, they could simply move to a time where he is not in the cage just like how a three dimensional person can escape a two dimensional cage by moving to the third dimension
@hazamax2139
4 ай бұрын
I mean it's not like we decide to move from 2D to 3D. It's more that we can't be bound by two dimensions when we are three dimensional.
@gravityassist3492
4 ай бұрын
as someone who study quantum physics I definitely overqualified to enjoy Vtuber, yet here I am
@Lord_Marquaad
4 ай бұрын
If Michi is your oshi than you're attracted to the opposite of your self :V
@gravityassist3492
4 ай бұрын
@@Lord_Marquaad she completes me
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
@@gravityassist3492now go find us a magnetic monopole
@MortZar
4 ай бұрын
Man I get it, she hurts, but we don't watch her to think, we watch vtubers to turn the brain off
@hazamax2139
4 ай бұрын
Bro wdym there's no over or under qualifications for enjoying something lmao
@Lord_Marquaad
4 ай бұрын
Damn Eviltoaster is good teacher, I aspire to be like him
@garethdewhurst1499
4 ай бұрын
maybe its my understanding but I feel like he didn't explain 4D very well, its about being able to navigate in those dimensions I think? so if, as 3D beings we can navigate to a point in a 3D space (like finding seats in a cinema), then a 4D person can navigate to that seat at any point in time, they can choose to go to that seat yesterday, then next year, then a week ago in same way that we can navigate to first one seat, then go to a different seat in the cinema.
@hartlettal8104
4 ай бұрын
💀💀 man you work really fast, nice clip!
@RaidThren
4 ай бұрын
2:13 The Mochi Boat
@maxboot2115
4 ай бұрын
I like the logical conclusion of the Ship of Theseus: once everything is replaced, if you take the original parts and out them all together in the same original configuration...is that the Ship of Theseus? Is the new one? Are they BOTH?
@Feanor1988bis
3 ай бұрын
The trick to answering the question is to define his property rights, but while you'd find a technically correct answer that way, the philosophical dilemma of whether it's still the same ship would remain unsolved. Also I'm pretty sure you can't replace the keel, because removing it would basically require building the ship back up from zero, and at that point it becomes hard to argue it is the same one even if you use parts salvaged from the old.
@aizero-ih3uy
3 ай бұрын
@@Feanor1988bis so... that could be the answer, it's still the old ship because it's still has it's old irreplacable part of it in it, once you rebuild it from ground zero, that's when it becomes a different one
@ELbabotas1
3 ай бұрын
But if you disassamble and reassemble a Pomni wodden string toy, piece by piece, seems like the same one unless changing the string that kept it together means it's a recycles thing, is the string the toy? Is the concept of toy the crossroad in wich matter and configuration meet? is the continuous existance of toy after it's first day of use just the human stubborness of wanting thing to persevere and remain? The moment a chip and a strand fall, it is no longer the object you originally saw and percieved, but it is still named the same, like a amnesiac person, like the son to a man, proud of its family name. The question is confusing by using Michi logic. If you want to mix fields, a thing can mean a thousand and be incongruent with itself. Things exist as a construct of the human mind desiring a simplified measurable outcome that can be used or avoided. The crossroad is like why we live, why the bear porridge is just right, Goldilocks is not on venus or mars, mercury or neptune. The right time, the right energy, the right conditions. The green line is where the true name lives. If a furry splinter is no longer Pomni, then the answer is that the new parts with no original are he true Toy. If the fallen is still a part but outside of it's main form, then the object is not broken or fixed, it grew, it expanded. Both are the true Toy. If the original factory provided components you first saw it with are what make it, then the Pomni is gradually decreasing, desappearing into the void, replaced by a new one. The Toy is dead. If somehow restored. What does restored mean? Somehow finding every atom that was ever shed? Or could we be talking furry splinter, and shape and configuration of inherited stuff, making the new toy with 'old' wood being filled the cracks with new unrelated material, also get he name of 'Toy'? Or is it as the biggest amount of non decreased material left? If restoration Has any part of original material, Toy was not dead or revived, if a molecule is not longer accountable for a name. If restoration has full molecular count as irrelevant and the conceptual material itself is main, then you get two different toys. The result depends of your preconception, and is non interchangeable with other people's ideas. Reality is formed by our hive minds, a connection of perceptions, when you are not there: there is no tree or forest, nor fall. Only hidrogen and carbon. Strong atraction. If you leave a computer working after the last breath ever given, the world still exists, alveat virtually. The is no universe with no life, there is calculations that show that, like the forth dimention(or the idea of a fifth), there is something outside of life, but not reality. When your eyes close, all Matter is Dark, and every day it grows closer. So, the answer depends on your beliefs. What IS? What does It mean? It's on you. When a concensus is achieved, everyone is on he same boat, and using the same measuring stick, an IF can be chosen as The One. In the mean time, who wants a wooden doll?
@jaybee9213
3 ай бұрын
Why is it called the Ship of Theseus? It's because he owned the ship regardless if the parts were replaced as long as the original owner still have it.
@francislelievre5172
3 ай бұрын
a good analogy for geometric dimensionality could be to imagine you have a 3x3x3 cube in minecraft, in position 1x1x1 you place a white wool, in position 2x2x2 you place pink wool & in position 3x3x3 you place red wool and the rest black, but you have a mod that allows you to instantly tp the yourself and a guide overlay of the chunk you are in to the Nether with one click, to the End with a second click & back to the Overworld with a third click, now the Nether & End are a spectrum of dimensionality just like Left-Right, Up-Down, Forward-Backward, Future-Past, Anawise-Katawise. so we can now think of the first cube as 3x3x3x1 and make cubes in the same place as 3x3x3x2 & 3x3x3x3 each with a different coloured block in position 1x2x3x2 & 1x2x3x3 and by moving block between the three overlapped cubes you are doing something like a Rubik's cube in 4D. Geometric dimensionality & Lorentz equations, Minkowski spacetime & Einsteinian spacetime are different things. a geometric hypercube is as separate from time as the idea of a square but the parabolic trajectory of a physical thrown block is time dependent, but the mathematical abstract of calculating the parabola isn't. time certainly is a dimension in multiple fields of math but also might not be IRL according to some physics theories.
@thatguyjared8560
4 ай бұрын
A study was actually published in 2014 debunking the mantis shrimp thing. Apparently the photoreceptors in human eyes are configured to make comparisons in the intensity of different light frequencies to blend colors, whereas the cones in the mantis shrimp's eyes rely on photoreceptors for individual colors, making them effectively worse at distinguishing different shades of color than humans.
@spamreciever4208
2 ай бұрын
"You get that free with your 3rd dimension" is such a Hitchiker's guide to the Galaxy ass sentence lmao
@edmg7
4 ай бұрын
This makes me want to see Michi play the Zero Escape series.
@ellieechoes
4 ай бұрын
Toaster should just have explained string theory and she would've gotten it.
@BaristaBryanA
4 ай бұрын
Markiplier : could this toaster be one of my people ?
@The.Mr.JBiggs
3 ай бұрын
The Big Bang is theoretically a 3-D instance as it's considered a fix point in time
@0ldgrumpyman
3 ай бұрын
Unless Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology theory is right. Then time existed before the Big Bang.
@The_DGO
3 ай бұрын
The nervous system doesn’t get replaced much at all. Most of those cells are the same ones your entire life
@PassiveSmoking
3 ай бұрын
Think of it this way. 3D is like a single frame of the film Toy Story. 4D is the entire film.
@yunyunpilled
3 ай бұрын
I still remember someone explained it to me like reality is an infinite number of pictures being taken.
@grifferman
3 ай бұрын
It's always fun hearing people discover Cartesian mind/body duality for the first time.
@filippo5834
3 ай бұрын
You missed the simplest way to explain dimensions themselves and why we cant imagine (so we cant drow them as well) more dimensions than basic 3D + 1 dimentional time. Dimention itself is vector - direction we can move. So 1D directions are forward and backward, 2D additional directions are right and left. If you imagine compass it has N E S W directions and all of them are at "flat" surface and there are right angles between all of them and you can imagine "center point" in the middle of them where compass arrows are rotating. 3rd dimension additional directions are up and down so as you can expect surface changes into object couse another extra directions still have to be placed in right angle to rest of directions going out from "center point". And there we go with 4th direction, additional directions are named ana and kata (you could hear those names in biology as anabolism and katabolism, those are opposite mechanisms so thats why they were used as opposite directions), the point is you have to take our "center point" with forward, backward, right, left, up, down all in right angles to each other and add ana and kata in way to make all 8 directions to be in right angles to each other. Human brain is not ready to understand quantum's physics and thats why we cant drow diagram of 4 dimensions. But.. i didnt explain time dimensions yet so lets begin. Compare time 1st dimension to space 1st dimension (forward, backward), time 1st dimension move possibility is just forward - as explain we, earth, sun and everything we know is moving forward time, everything is getting older in simplest words. Sciense is allowing time to have more than one dimension and direction couse we couldnt regret it yet. Well.. 2nd time dimension allows to move backward in time but we didnt find how to. Its not end about time dimensions, couse as time is going forward and we are flowing with that its not fact we can go only with one small exacly path, take a look at road cross, you can go forward time with right space or left space (or other direction) but experiences proved that one physical 3D object can move through 2 holes in wall at once to 'land' on 2nd side of wall but only when object has no observer. Thats telling us we are going through many time directions in 1 dimension at once casually and unnoticeable. Another funfact, we are living in 3D space world (couse we cant imagine more space dimensions) but our eyes are seeing only 2 dimentional, when we are looking at cube we know its 99% cube or 1% illusion fake but we see it flat, we are looking at right, left and up walls of cube but we dont see rest, we can say rest doesnt exist couse we cant notice it by just looking from one perspective
@zaraphehe8109
4 ай бұрын
Wtf are u high? Best impression michi. It should make animation
@SuperInsanewolf
4 ай бұрын
you lose certain childhood memories usually cause of trauma of some kind.
@Accelerator370
4 ай бұрын
This why i love michi, in 20 minutes she learnt that she doesn't need to be smart to be happy, the best philosophical conclusion in history of mankind ❤
@sarahtopless6991
3 ай бұрын
with that question there is a simple answer because it is simple the ship is no longer the same ship because ALL of it has been replaced but with the body the brain organs and bones never get replaced so you are always you the only thing that is replaced is the skin mech
@DakkaBert
3 ай бұрын
Damn she really got us at the end
@rosl.
3 ай бұрын
Michi talking about class politics in fashion: 🤓☝️💯🧠💥🧠‼️ Michi when light exists: 👶
@Nabekukka
4 ай бұрын
God I've missed these moments.
@r0landleaf370
3 ай бұрын
every 7 years, you technically have a new body.
@RhysHill-ur8lq
4 ай бұрын
This question is a matter of opinion in reality
@michaelklim8277
3 ай бұрын
I would absolutely LOVE to just try to educate vtubers all day. It is always funny. On the hypercube, these gifs never made sense to me. The concept of an extra dimension made sense, but that weird fleshlight video didn't. But a few days ago, I saw a video of a hypercube being unfolded to appear as a 3D object like you would to a cube to make it 2D. It finally made sense visually. What these animations are trying to represent is that each side of a hypercube is actually a cube, and we get the weird shape from trying to bend the cubes to fit together as a 4D object. Also, I don't think that a hypercube is supposed to be the same fourth dimension that time is. A hypercube exists in our 3D space plus one of the other 11 spacial dimensions plus time like normal.
@SDE1994
3 ай бұрын
the ship thing is a big contentious point in restoration, there is a big golden castle in Japan that burnt down a few decades ago and was rebuilt, it is considered the same castle by the government and JP historians, while in UK, the Flying Scotsman has has so many parts replaced several times its 100 year life that many consider it not the original FS
@Bleats_Sinodai
Ай бұрын
Color is a perception of different wavelengths. An object looks to be a certain color because it reflected that specific wavelength of light into your eyes.
@NinthSettler
3 ай бұрын
i once had a hallucinatory dream where i could see outer space in 4d. It was like a youtube video with a progress bar that i could scroll to make stars appear and disappear. Pretty cool.
@zamorvex
3 ай бұрын
as someone with tetrachromia i can confirm that everything in nature has way more color variance than what other people with 3 cones can see
@BobAronius-xn4ub
3 ай бұрын
Really wanted him to talk about 2 watches and a train.
@DJAutonomous
Ай бұрын
Him: "no."
@bxnaxmxxnaxx1914
3 ай бұрын
When your adorable brain mush cant handle the pounding science is giving it. But it's fun, even if one ultimately chooses from few available options. Even being willingly basic and loveable.
@kittykaidoodles796
3 ай бұрын
Listening to laymen trying to describe science as if they're an authority and getting it WRONG is impossible to watch for me I want to correct him so bad so Michi gets the real info lol
@MementoMori-kn4dh
3 ай бұрын
2D 2.5D 3D Theoretical 4D
@gexianhen
3 ай бұрын
the idea of the book is kinda correct.if 4th dimentional being could see all the 3d universe as if it was a book , every second staked on top of himself
@turbulnceofawsm9940
2 ай бұрын
how dare he remind me of calc 3 and differential equations
@TheMrDavidCurran
3 ай бұрын
I like to think of this in terms of what we, as humans, can manipulate. I can pick up a drink bottle, move it up and down, side to side, and closer or further away, but I cannot move it further in time. We are fourth dimension beings, because we move in the fourth dimension, but can't manipulate it.
@volbla
3 ай бұрын
I feel like Toaster needed to go even more basic, like: what actually is light.
@scyrra9908
2 ай бұрын
0D = a dot, 1D = singlular point, 2D = completely flat, 3D = cubes & stuff, = 4D time (it getting later in the day is moving forward in time)
@mutilixusX
3 ай бұрын
3:14 It's not about the ship, it's about the crew of the ship 😂 nakama forever
@WhimsyHeath
3 ай бұрын
Someone should show Michi the videos from the creators of Miegakure- they are really good explanations about 4D things, they're mind bending.
@iandownes3130
2 күн бұрын
Look up "An immense world" by Ed Yong. If you didn't understand their light/color conversion.
@nolan8233
3 ай бұрын
Human cells have always been my counter to the ship of theseus. Its still the same boat as things were relaced one at a time, if you were to rebuild the ship from nothing its a new ship, but so long as you build off the original, its still the original
@SLeoPereS
3 ай бұрын
im so glad i asked the 4D question
@the.real.mutantroosta
2 ай бұрын
i like my axe, its had 3 new handles and 2 new heads
@tiagotiagot
3 ай бұрын
The Sun looks yellowish because the bluer parts of it's light get spread more easily by the air (and that is also why sunsets and sunrises are redder, the blue got spread thin going thru more air due to the shallower angle, and the stuff closer to red is what's left); not all of it but a lot of it. So you would think it would be white without the air, right? But here is the big twist, it has a lot of light across a wide range of colors, and it would look white to us, but it is actually the brightest at the green frequency, the Sun is whiteish green! And our eyes and brain just compensate for that and make it look white!
@korben600
3 ай бұрын
“I used a mobius strip to cheat on my tests.” “…” “Wait, you guys don’t cheat on your tests????” This explains SO much…😂
@isengaja
3 ай бұрын
Michie got science lesson and got 🤯🤯🤯
@volbla
3 ай бұрын
So yes, as of right now string theory is indeed "just a theory". It is an attempt at explaining some of the deepest mysteries of the universe, like how the hell gravity works at very small scales. It has not been properly tested, and it's hard to tell if it's even _testable_ because it makes claims about such tiny objects that we don't know if it's possible to measure them. But it is derived from a mathematical framework that is based on reality. It's not just a guess. It is, to put it in detective terms, a suspect. It seems to explain some of our observations, but we are still far from certain so we can't put it in jail yet. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. All scientific explanations are _hypotheses_ until they've proven they work better than all other potential explanations. A general addendum about science: The universe can be described by mathematics. That just means that we can calculate in precise detail how things behave. If i throw a ball (and i know of all the forces involved) i can tell you _exactly_ where the ball will land before it happens. In theory anyway :] But some of our calculations don't make sense or don't fully agree with our observations. That means our mathematical models are somehow wrong or incomplete. Science is an investigation of how the world actually works. It is a search for new formulas and ideas that accurately describe the universe. We are not all-knowing, so the best we can do is think, test and observe. If we're lucky we might end up with a _less bad_ explanation for how the world works.
@Forchune
3 ай бұрын
Using time as the 4th dimension is pretty confusing. Using the flatland analogy to add a 4th spacial dimension is easier to explain imo.
@BladeLigerV
3 ай бұрын
Now, what we need to do, is ask Henya about this stuff?
@somedudewatchintv5297
4 ай бұрын
20:14 I just got reminded of a KZitem video made by a former astrophysicist Dr Fatima. It's called something like Gravity is a social construct and that's OK. The thumbnail is just her with the caption "why we made dark matter up".
@Lord_Marquaad
4 ай бұрын
idk how many have written about this but to replace the board in the ship, each piece have to be cut in the ship in mind, so the design is still uniquely Theseus's. It's neat that the old ship still influence the new one. does that make sense?
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
But then again, someone could just cut the ship further into a new shape entirely independent of the original ship. For example, if the ship was made of plastic, you could just melt it onto a new piece. All that's limited is the available material and our brains that are hooked on object permanence.
@VictorianSnailGod
3 ай бұрын
Did you know that physics is just applied philosophy?
@Bjaz98
3 ай бұрын
A point/dot, is the cross-section of a line, which is the cross-section of a square, which is the cross-section of a cube, which is the cross-section of a tesseract.
@nate_venture
4 ай бұрын
I get the idea of philosophical questions like this, but I feel like you only get "stuck" on them with no answer if your mind is rigid and you have trouble with abstraction. Case in point: it's still the ship of Theseus. It was never not the Ship of Theseus. "But how can you just say that?" I can already hear some smarmy voice in reply. Because as far as I'm concerned, the Ship of Theseus isn't the parts, its a construct different and greater than the sum of the parts. So the mast broke, and you replaced it? That's now the 2nd mast used on the Ship of Theseus. The old broken mast, is the original mast of the Ship of Theseus. The ship is still the Ship of Theseus, and as soon as the new mast was used that is now the mast of the Ship of Theseus. So even as you advance and replace every other part over years or centuries, at every step the new parts become part of the Ship of Theseus and it never stops being the Ship of Theseus. Because the Ship of Theseus isn't just the collection of parts. Take it the other way. You have the Ship of Theseus, in it's original construction of parts. And you disassemble it. Now, it is no longer the Ship of Theseus. Because you've actually deconstructed it into nothing but a set of parts. Parts which could be used to construct the Ship of Theseus, or to reconstruct a rebuilt 2nd iteration of the Ship of Theseus. But the parts on their own are no the full construct. Much the same that before the ship was built, before the parts were harvested and prepared to be assembled, they were not at that time Parts of the Ship of Theseus. They were just parts. Then the Ship of Theseus was built, and is something more than just the raw parts gathered together. So removal of a part, replacement of a part, even the replacement of all parts doesn't dissolve the greater construct that is the Ship of Theseus. Only complete simultaneous disassembly, in my opinion, would result in the end of that greater construct. So yeah these are neat to think about and all that, but I think they're only mind-blowing if you're unable or unwilling to just make a determination. If you're only ever leaving them open-ended for yourself, I feel like you're dropping the ball on the point of thinking about it at all, which imo is to figure out how YOU personally view and consider these sort of concepts. Nobody has to agree with you, you can make a determination as simplistic as "it's still the Ship of Theseus until more than 50% of the hull is replaced" and that's also valid. The point is for you to actually bother to figure out what you feel the answer would be, to better understand your own mind.
@Gnulcho
4 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the "Immovable Object vs Unstoppable Object" question. There you can just say that the objects pass through each other. I can't say that I came up with that solution by myself though, that was one of the bigger physics youtubers (or, well, wherever that youtuber got it from), but I can't recall which one.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
That's a paradox for you. Sometimes our brains either just can't comprehend it or can't make a solution for the problem. Though the ship of theseus merely shows us the pitfalls of our sense of object permanence and essence. Just like how ol, Shrödinger's cat can break our brains at first, we have to move on from our intuition since they're not as useful for something we weren't evolved to understand.
@adriannebee2056
4 ай бұрын
I would say it more shows a person's view on objects and symbols. Some people will say it's not the real thing if it's not the original, but some will say the symbol remains the same. You can have people say it's not because it's not the material of Theseus's time. It came after, thus it's become something else. But you can also say once it is installed on the Ship of Theseus, it becomes part of it, and thus even though none of the original material remains, the ship isn't the materials but the symbol behind it.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
@@adriannebee2056 or the ship of theseus grew from one entity to many through the inclusion of new materials. You could also say that the Ship of Theseus never existed since it is merely so in the conceptual level, not objective reality.
@blitz_cuby5450
3 ай бұрын
"So he's saying that its all just a theory" You guys know what to do just comment it 😆
@alchemicpink2392
3 ай бұрын
In terms of moving through the 4th dimension: Nothing actively does that (which is why time travel is impossible), everything just exists at a new coordinate of time as it passes. Like, a second is the distance between two points in time the same way an inch is the distance between two points in space. Also big fucking note: THEORIES ARE PROVEN TO THE CURRENT BEST SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING. Edit: Nvm, a chatter pointed it out. And yeah, it's extremely important to get the difference between theory and hypothesis correct when talking about physics. Because "theoretical physics" are not "hypothetical physics".
@greedier-7661
3 ай бұрын
Well the problem is if we think of time as 4 dimension or not. We could think of 4 geometric dimension and it would simply make objects appear out of nowhere or reaper/ get bigger and change shape, he should have told her a 2d paper example, where we could place a cube on paper and people living there would only see square(well technically a line). So we humans are 4 dimensional beings as we live in 4 dimensions but are only capable of seeing 3 dimensions.(2 dimensional being could only see lines). If we take 4 dimension as time, 5 dimensional creature could see certain amount of time at the same time and interact with any point of it. On the other hand 4 dimension as a geometric type would make that 5 dimensional being simply be able to appear and disappear things warp their shape depending on their true 4 dimensional structure. The weird thing is that then everything we see would have hidden more complex shape as the same way even paper has 3 dimensions, we humans would have hidden 4 dimensional shape.
@ghostagent3552
4 ай бұрын
Point1: Weird thing is that memories aren't as permanent as we make them to be. Literally trying to bring them back up is almost like us generating it again Point 2: It's all about how light itself is interpreted. Objectively it is the specific wavelength of light regardless of whether or not we can perceive it. The semantics would be the issue by then. Point 3: 4th dimension is more likely just more directions in space. String Theory requires atleast 11 dimensions or something (not sure if it's called M Theory now or not), but really it's just physical dimensions plus time. Point 4: A 4d object can only be perceived as a flattened slice into 3d or 2d objects since we literally cannot see or imagine them. The hypercube here isn't a good representation, I suggest 4d golf. Point 5: Game Theory lore is technically only a hypothesis or a suggestion, not a proper theory. Point 6: Sometimes science can seem unintuitive until you look greater and deeper into the matter, but it is a gateway to understand phenomenons in nature. Math then, helps systematize calculations of the variables, allowing us to make predictions with them as one of our greatest tools.
@The.Mr.JBiggs
3 ай бұрын
From thoughts of agency and owns self of being to photosynthesis process aided by chlorophyll, not what you expect when watching VTubers
@johnj.spurgin7037
3 ай бұрын
Actually the 4th dimension would be TIME.
@Kokuki39
3 ай бұрын
I want to see her try to comprehend the other 7 dimensions XD
@johnj.spurgin7037
3 ай бұрын
If you think about it, everything we think is 3d is 4d because we perceive it as 4d creatures. We can't actually perceive 1D or 4D completely.
@r0landleaf370
3 ай бұрын
3rd. dimension is for physical interface/interaction through the 4th.
@CrazyGamebino
3 ай бұрын
i thought this story sounded familiar i just never learned the name but to answer the questions it is both still the ship and not the ship by the first replacement
@rezkel7404
3 ай бұрын
Here is a modern one, at what point in replacing parts does the old computer become a new computer?
@Ai_M3talloidX7
3 ай бұрын
Clocks can be whatever shape we make it. Square, rectangle, circle and ovals, triangle, octagon. They aren't limited to one shape or a device. I think I'm out of my depth here...
@ashardalondragnipurake
3 ай бұрын
wish i had a vtuber to explain simple things to this seems fun
@neiljohnragas7449
3 ай бұрын
There's actually one question for the Theseus Boat: So, if the boat that was replaced all over is already a different boat, what if we built another boat using the parts. that was replaced, from the original boat. Which boat now is Theseus Boat? The newly built from the original parts or the current with replaced parts? I cracked the hell up on "if people are 3d, then old people are 4d"... WTF
@Silber7
3 ай бұрын
Has she played the game 'Superliminal'? Could be fun to talk about 3D again
@saphironkindris
3 ай бұрын
The ship of Theseus is the ship of Theseus. It is not any single piece of wood or cloth, it is an idea, and once the materials are removed from the ship, they stop being part of the ship. Even if you built a new ship with all the same parts, the 'original' ship is still actually the 'new' ship that has all different parts. I clip my fingernails and shed skin, are those clippings still a part of me? No. Even if you eventually got enough biomass to build a whole new Silver, is that new silver 'silver'? No. It's something completely different. Silver is me, even though all of my parts are changing over time.
@lollypopalopicus
3 ай бұрын
To add some more context to the hypercube. It's not a 4d cube, but a 4d cube's shadow. To explain, if you hold a cube up to a light, it's shadow on the wall is 2d, but you can make out that is a 3d cube's shadow based on it's shape, and the way it morphs as you move it. In the same way, just as 3rd cube makes a 2d shadow, a 4d cube hypothetically makes a 3d shadow. the hypercube is not actually a 4th dimensional cube, but a visual representation of what it's 3d shadow would look like.
@Octagram_
4 ай бұрын
Ah yes, the beginning of the short 13 hours stream
Пікірлер: 243