If you're wondering if I really takeoff with the open spoilers, the answer is yes. During flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@einherz
Ай бұрын
may be something with controllers? actually this thing can reduce aoa because you use more power for same speed, and this can help, but.... i thought it's something about engine temperature:) low speed need more turbine rpm actually and this opened things can moves out some heat, i guess:) but i really don't know, never read about that.
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
@@einherz Yes, it could be the controls that were too sensitive or the MSFS flight model itself, which in many planes is not realistic during taxi, takeoff and landing.
@einherz
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience in my case all good, i much less accurate pilot than you, believe me:) she take off like usual and landing like usual, if trim good, speed good. check your controls and settings probably
@NeroontheGoon
Ай бұрын
How about NOT calling them spoilers and actually calling them what they are, those are AIRBRAKES!
@einherz
Ай бұрын
@@NeroontheGoon come on man. that thing in controls set as spoilers for spoilers and airbrakes. don't push asobo to create another mapping, as they does with separate boosters for heli that could set on the same trim for fix wing, then they add big messy condition lever, that could live on mixture, they add heli throttle, that could live as always had on rpm... they even add prop pitch... yes that all different things, but one general axis that can move prop pitch and set rpm and heli throttle can used in different models by different ways. as spoilers and airbrakes does. because of that separate and word concretize we now need to create different profiles, because some models glitchy, because they add that nonsense separate crap. they could create one axis and call it mixture/condition or prop pitch/rpm/heli throttle. and now you give them idea to create new bug shit with airbrakes separate from spoilers.
@SliceofLife7777
Ай бұрын
F104 Starfighter. Designed and first flown in the late 1950's. By the early 60's it became the first jet to incorporate the General Electric J,-79 augmented turbojet. The engine and the plane were designed for mach 2+. It was the first jet to test and use the Vulcan 20mm rotary cannon. It was the first fighter to have fully blown flaps (boundery control system). It was the first production fighter accepted into US service capable of mach 2. The US Airforce had no idea what to do with it but they wanted some. It could take off, climb to 30,000ft in less than two minutes, while hurtling towards a target over 100 miles away, kill it, and be wheels down back at the airbase in less than twenty minutes. Very stable at high speeds, and very fast, even at low altitude. Even todays modern fighters would be hard pressed to catch it. It remained in production until the early 1980's and served well past the turn of the century. Not bad for an obsolete 1950's hot rod. But..she had rules. You don't follow those rules, you crash. Even with the boundary layer control system, she had a high stall speed, and exceeding 5° angle of attack could tumble the Starfighter. No recovery was possible, and the early models had downward firing ejection seats. Only disciplined pilots and an experienced ground crew could make this machine relatively safe. Remember, only Germany had a huge problem with the plane. Even so, they kept flying them because the Starfighter was the cheapest mach 2 fighter option for them, and many other European nations. These small countries found this plane's blistering acceleration and top speed, and agreeable price tag worth the short range. Watch Discovery Wings F104 Documentary. It was awesome. It was dangerous. It was fast.
@clockdva20
22 күн бұрын
Yes But Germany used it as a multi roll aircraft something it was not designed for as one of the Century series it was designed as an out and out Bomber interceptor in the same way the F4 Phantom was. and soon that doctrine would prove to be a major issue once the USA was at War in Vietnam and Dog Fighting returned. But the Starfighter is another Ground breaking design from Kelly Johnson's Lockheed team who gave us some of the greatest planes ever to fly.
@dukeford8893
19 күн бұрын
@@clockdva20 The USAF F-104C was a multi-role aircraft. The original Starfighter was designed as an air superiority fighter, not an interceptor.
@DieTabbi
6 күн бұрын
The widow maker, next to F4 and F15 one of the most iconic planes of childhood.
@CaptVirtual
Ай бұрын
F104 Starfighter. Essentially a missile with a man strapped to the front.
@donjuandemccarthy2041
20 күн бұрын
Congratulations, now you understand why one if it's nicknames was the "Missile with a Man in it"
@mrfoogaba2005
Ай бұрын
In Germany we have many nicknames for this Aircraft like „Supersonicprothesis“ or „Widowmaker“. But it keeps on being one of the most fascinating Jets! I saw one last weekend in the airplane Collection of the „Deutsches Museum“ in Munich. A beautiful rocket disguised as a airplane.
@cerrystyle
Ай бұрын
We use the same nickname in Italy like yours "widowmaker" which we say "crea vedove" or "spillone" (big pin) or "cigar" for the typical shape.
@R3volutionblu3s
21 күн бұрын
I would argue that in it's intended role as an interceptor it wasn't really any more dangerous than other contemporary fighters. The problem was that so many countries tried to shoehorn it into the role of a fighter-bomber. I have never been able to understand how anyone could even look at this aircraft and imagine that was something it could be well-suited for (Unless I was a German politician looking looking at it next to a briefcase full of cash being held by a Lockheed exec).
@michaeldenesyk3195
Ай бұрын
Taking off with the airbrakes deployed is definitely NOT in the flight manual for the real F-104, or any other jet or propellor-driven aircraft.
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
@@michaeldenesyk3195 The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@joyl7842
25 күн бұрын
My dad would have loved this so much.
@deborahchesser7375
11 күн бұрын
It’s hard to believe how real that looks. He definitely would have loved it. 🐾✌️🇺🇸
@sanghoonlee5171
16 күн бұрын
4:07 That's just beautiful...
@danmallery9142
20 күн бұрын
Still one of the most beautiful planes ever designed. I can only imagine what it could do if you put a F110-132 in it. It would would absolutely scream! (Before anyone starts, I am not getting down in the weeds of the feasibility of this. Intake inlet size, airframe strength, controls, the fact that there are hardly any flying examples of f-104s in existence make it an impossible mental exercise only)
@FastJetPerformance
Ай бұрын
Well, that was epic - love it, scariest thing I've ever seen - 200 kts approach speed!
@chrisl.7016
Ай бұрын
Ah the F-104, that's the aircraft static display that outside of my basic training barracks.
@PN_48
Ай бұрын
Love it. Man I wish we had this when I was younger and had time to sim!
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@sonorousbelchpipe1021
Ай бұрын
Nice touch - they actually modeled the horrendous exhaust plume of the early gas-guzzling GE J-79. You really didn't need radar in that era to spot your opponent. The trailing thick black smoke of the jet exhaust was a dead givaway of your position. I read somewhere every time a 50's-60's era SAC bomber (as in B-47 or B-52) took to the skies an entire forest in Brazil died within hours. Nice nose profile shot during dusk landing with full moon in the background.
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@NeroontheGoon
Ай бұрын
@@sonorousbelchpipe1021 Ya, bombers take off in America and a forest in Brazil dies? The idiocy of that statement hurts my brain. What kind of epic fuckery are you reading, some sort of tripe and drivel from some douche bag environmentalist? a climate clown? please, enlighten us,inquiring minds want to know.
@Masca79
Ай бұрын
Welcome to the real Formula 1 guys.
@CrisGameplay11
Ай бұрын
Boa tarde meu amigo mitológico parabéns pelo joinha garantido tmj 🤗 😊
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Muito obrigado!
@ancientmonotheism5118
Ай бұрын
90% RPM, 190-200 knots during final. Not bad. I usually had 86% RPM and 170 knots.
@haedubabaganush
Ай бұрын
We would always aim to land at 180 kts, but sometimes higher depending on how much fuel was left on board....but the 180 to 200 zone was pretty normal.
@ramonmedina1974
24 күн бұрын
Cool to hear the J79 sound!
@BuzzbeeDC
Ай бұрын
Do you realize how this plane is so fast? Literally you'd need a flight control system of the F16 to make it stable. Flown in the early 60's. That's why it's The Widow Maker.
@michmat77
Ай бұрын
Airbrakes… Airbrakes ❤
@325xitgrocgetter
16 сағат бұрын
Wasn't this the plane used in the Star Trek episode "Tomorrow is Yesterday?" The F104 was sent to intercept a UFO which turned out to be the Enterprise in low Earth orbit?
@matteob.966
Ай бұрын
One of the best videos I've seen on mfs, great editing
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@sergelibe4946
28 күн бұрын
👍👍👍👍
@einherz
Ай бұрын
why airbrake out? aha, i found in the your comment the answer. nice video:)
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
@@einherz The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@alexsky88749
21 күн бұрын
This is a magnificent airplane video! Very realistic!
@FlightSim_Experience
21 күн бұрын
@@alexsky88749 Thank you!
@Redhawk03a
Ай бұрын
Stunningly beautiful aircraft
@Hypersonicbiker
4 күн бұрын
The rocket like rocket. Low drag plane. I think, how will this plane with modern materals?(This plane deserve remake) Modern engine, modern dijital cockpit, carbon fiber and composites lightweight materals...etc. No fuel tanks of course...(Fuel tanks and other bombs are doing to widow maker)
@dimitriosadamopoulos5272
5 күн бұрын
I have never seen before take off with air brakes on!!!
@TheBearStudios
Ай бұрын
The F104 G .. G for Germany. Bob Calvert and the Star Fighters.
@KillerKev1961
Ай бұрын
Hopefully a module for DCS becomes avail.
@deborahchesser7375
11 күн бұрын
4 drop tanks, he must be going for a ride.
@TheGarconrapide
12 күн бұрын
The Spanish Air Force was the only one to operate the F-104 without a single loss
@Lee78072
20 күн бұрын
Absolutly Beatiful. Love it. But why are the Airbrakes out all the time? A Game Glitch?
@FlightSim_Experience
20 күн бұрын
@@Lee78072 Thank you! The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@Lee78072
20 күн бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience Ah thats why. Anyway your Video is really great. Alot of great Atmosphere.
@crackerbarrel6965
Ай бұрын
Yet another mission oriented aircraft found outside its elements in MSFS.
@marathi22
Ай бұрын
And yet us casual players can get to play with it in an accessible sim. Isn't it a wonderful world?
@archerpiperii2690
25 күн бұрын
I think I see a plane over here with my name on it...
@DrDoid0420
Ай бұрын
Great video! I have just subscribed to your channel 😀 Would you please tell what S/W you used to 1. Record flight and 2. To edit that recording. Many thanks.
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Thank you! To record I use Nvidia Shadowplay and to edit I use DaVinci Resolve.
@katewingfield4828
Ай бұрын
Why do he opens the airbrakes during takeoff?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@crumble701
26 күн бұрын
how did this aircraft fly with such short wings, partially blocked by pods underneath? No wonder there were so many crashes… ChatGPT answered my question in detail actually
Great video. Lots of details. I don’t understand why a demo of this stunning aircraft would be flown around like a Cessna 172? It is designed to cruse at Mach 1.7, 70,000 feet. Actual spec were confidential. It’s a hot rod. This was like a demo of a Ferrari on a Sunday cruse. Still, I liked it. Is the simulator not capable?
@FlightSim_Experience
12 күн бұрын
The idea of the video was exactly that. The route I chose for the flight is short; So, if I climbed to 70,000 feet and reached maximum speed, there wouldn't be time to do cinematic takes. See this as if it were a Ferrari being filmed for a movie clip.
@frnkbooth6871
12 күн бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience Thanks. Makes perfect sense. Great video.
@FlightSim_Experience
11 күн бұрын
@@frnkbooth6871 Thank you!
@mackjsm7105
Ай бұрын
um... AIR BRAKES?????
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
@einherz The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@mackjsm7105
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience AH!! thank you sorry!!! I was like close the air brakes and go fast!! lol
@streetrace442
18 күн бұрын
Do you always leave your air breaks open on take off and while in flight?...I read your statement about the air breaks. You made me thankful that I was with an A-7E squadron instead.
@FlightSim_Experience
18 күн бұрын
@@streetrace442 During takeoff, the problem was probably with my joystick, which was very sensitive. However, after takeoff and in some other scenes where the air brakes were activated, it wasn't because of a problem, but because I didn't want to reach very high speeds while recording the video. The purpose of this video is to be cinematic only, and the flight I chose has a short route. Leaving the plane at maximum speed would make me arrive too quickly, not giving me time to do all the cinematographic recording. Watching the video, it looks like I took off and did the entire flight with the air brakes open, but to make the video well edited, I need to remove many scenes so that the video doesn't get tiring to watch, at the same time I leave scenes that call attention and don't make people skip the video or leave it without having liked it.
@brutusmuerto
Ай бұрын
The howl.
@wajiwajiazuki6576
Ай бұрын
SPEED BRAKE!
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@wajiwajiazuki6576
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience Thank you for the explanation However, the F-104's landing speed is fast. It would be difficult to land at 200nt😅
@YY-ut9zm
Күн бұрын
音が音が音がーーーーー!!!!!!
@user-tj5tm2ow7d
27 күн бұрын
amazing live footage how did they get it?
@KyleCowden
19 күн бұрын
The Silver Sliver
@stinkyfungus
3 күн бұрын
I dont think that even a gas guzzler like the 104 needs 4 bags to oneway to nellis from edwards...
@KernitTheFont
28 күн бұрын
Guessing we're ignoring the PAPI lights in the starfighter? 😅
@Flighter37
Ай бұрын
Nice video. :)
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Manny32V
Ай бұрын
sounds are bad ass.
@thecsr2944
8 күн бұрын
The G version... again? Why not make the A or C version finally for a sim? 🤷♀🤷♀
@burnerjack01
Ай бұрын
Was that the plane known as the Lawn Dart?
@rattlesnake8531
21 күн бұрын
Take-off with the speedbrakes deployed.... the bird would never have got airborne and would have crashed at the end of the runway. One of 292 total losses of F 104s of the German Air Force and Navy! And this accident would certainly have been a pilot error, not to mention all the dubious assessments of the F 104 accident investigations. Ingame instability it is simply a bug.....
@SuperSeanobrien
24 күн бұрын
Your speed brakes were deployed for the entire flight.
@FlightSim_Experience
18 күн бұрын
The purpose of this video is to be cinematic only, and the flight I chose has a short route. Leaving the plane at maximum speed would make me arrive too quickly, not giving me time to do all the cinematographic recording. Watching the video, it looks like I took off and did the entire flight with the air brakes open, but to make the video well edited, I need to remove many scenes so that the video doesn't get tiring to watch, at the same time I leave scenes that call attention and don't make people skip the video or leave it without having liked it.
@hasanmahmood2739
28 күн бұрын
I think air brakes should have been realistic rather unrealistic.
@G3R3SkYwAlK3R
Ай бұрын
Airbrake for life!
@techstepman
Ай бұрын
i dont wanna be that guy , cause its a great vid but, what happened to the airbrakes?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@techstepman
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience huh...thats good info.
@thesnazzycomet
17 күн бұрын
oooo she pretty
@iagikV2
25 күн бұрын
👍
@Oulsky
17 сағат бұрын
Et les aéro-freins au décollage ??! Ça casse le réalisme… sinon c’est beau
@jerry-c.w1782
Ай бұрын
speedbrake opened during takeoff ??
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@frankyang4114
Ай бұрын
take off with airbrake extend?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@JasonSnow-zq2ve
Ай бұрын
I'm not an expert but not having the airbrakes out on takeoff might make things easier.
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@JasonSnow-zq2ve
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience If it works for you dude. You enjoy that.
@shirleytwsw
Ай бұрын
Why airbrakes deployed ????
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@Chris11249
2 күн бұрын
You're in a sim, why didn't you max out the low level flight speed?!
@FlightSim_Experience
2 күн бұрын
Because this video was made with the purpose of being cinematographic only.
@Chris11249
2 күн бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience Well it was very cinematographic, so you did well! Maybe on the next one :) Can you do an F4 Phantom?
@SumonBari-eb9qz
21 күн бұрын
পারবতীপুর অফিস
@26043449
29 күн бұрын
No quitaste los Air Break
@FlightSim_Experience
27 күн бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@26043449
27 күн бұрын
Thank you for explaining
@RobertoBusi62
18 күн бұрын
tail airbrakes? why?
@FlightSim_Experience
18 күн бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
Ай бұрын
Is MS FS F104 better than DCS F104?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
I don't know. I never flew the F-104 made for DCS.
@haedubabaganush
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience The flight model for the 104g in DCS is very well done by the VSN guys and follows the published data curves quite well...however, it suffers from the limitations of the unclickable cockpit and like the MSFS model, the accelerations are not quite right. It would be very good if someone would develop a full fidelity model with working cockpit for DCS.
@ozark6454
27 күн бұрын
Meh, no good if your into combat sim w/multiplayer
@FlightSim_Experience
27 күн бұрын
This video has just one purpose: To make a flight with cinematographic style. I really like combat simulators like DCS, but for now I just watch this type of content because I don't know anything about aerial combat strategies.
@tomaszyka3762
29 күн бұрын
Start wwith open brake shields is nonsense.holt úpadek vzdělání
@iamtoooldtocare
21 күн бұрын
The sound for this aircraft sim is awful. I’ve seen these things take off and it’s deafening. This is really poor.
@C-141B_FE
Ай бұрын
Chuck Yeager did it better. #TheRightStuff.
@jwiese100
Ай бұрын
You got the right stuff?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
I did not understand your question.
@jwiese100
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience movie reference
@kidsafe
Ай бұрын
“He must have clearance, right?” “Yeah sure, he must! It’s here someplace…”
@jwiese100
Ай бұрын
@kidsafe you got any beemans? Lend me some would ya ill pay ya back later
@user-mf7wl5mb4z
29 күн бұрын
Страшный и бесполезный
@ncc2000
Ай бұрын
American fighter simbolo della Aeronautica Italiana.❤ P.S Why the aerobrakes are open during take off?
@FlightSim_Experience
Ай бұрын
The explanation is in the comment I left pinned, but during flight tests with the F-104 before recording this video, I had a lot of instability problems during takeoff: it always reached very high speeds or one of the wings fell to the sides. Of course this is one of the main features of the F-104; instability was normal for this plane, in addition to it being practically a 'rocket'. But when I takeoff with the spoilers open, I was able to drastically reduce the instability, making it much more stable and controllable, in addition to being able to maintain a speed of around 300 knots during the climb.
@ncc2000
Ай бұрын
@@FlightSim_Experience I repeat: this is "an Italian airplane". I've never heard of this. Maybe a software "bug"?
Пікірлер: 158