phenomenal, you made a concept I couldn't understand for so long so clear and concise
@KatherineSilzCarson
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Celia for your comment and for watching my video. I am happy that you found it helpful!
@zhepingwang4954
3 жыл бұрын
this is an underrated channel. wonderful logic flow. subscribed!
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment, Zheping! And thank you for subscribing!
@abdupathan5176
2 жыл бұрын
I rarely subscribe to channels but this video was wayyy too helpful! It literally had EVERYTHING I needed and was explained super concisely. Thanks you!!!!!!
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment, Abdu, I'm glad it was helpful! Thank you for watching!
@MrGoofyCz
2 жыл бұрын
Great explanation! Saved me a lot of times and nerves. Thank you!
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
I am glad it was helpful, Matteo. Thank you for watching!
@britishaccent221b4
3 жыл бұрын
You just saved my day, thanks for great explanation
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! And thank you for watching!
@hnt7961
3 жыл бұрын
What the best useful video on Mixed Strategy and providing clear summary as to why we need to use Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium! Thumbs up.
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the compliment - and thank you for watching!
@cameronschyuder9034
2 жыл бұрын
Oh my god Was having a mental breakdown over my homework assignment, you explained this perfectly!
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Glad I could be of help! Thank you for watching!
@karkiroman
Жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏, you are an amazing teacher!!
@KatherineSilzCarson
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@parthnegi9041
3 жыл бұрын
Explained it much better than my professor! Thank you very much!!
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
I am glad it was helpful! Thank you for watching!
@crosbybilly8907
2 жыл бұрын
sorry to be so off topic but does someone know of a method to log back into an instagram account? I stupidly forgot my login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me
@adrieneverett9476
2 жыл бұрын
@Crosby Billy Instablaster ;)
@crosbybilly8907
2 жыл бұрын
@Adrien Everett Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and im in the hacking process atm. I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
@crosbybilly8907
2 жыл бұрын
@Adrien Everett it worked and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy:D Thanks so much you saved my ass :D
@docadhish
Жыл бұрын
This explanation is gold. Thanks a lot ma'am!!
@KatherineSilzCarson
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching! I am glad this was helpful!
@seymagulnihalyildiz6488
4 ай бұрын
Great content, thank you❤
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment and for watching!
@shubhajitpaul5554
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.. i am training to be an evolutionary biologist .. it helped me a lot
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching! These ideas definitely have applications to your field. Good luck with your studies!
@winstonlian839
2 жыл бұрын
that was excellent.
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Winston! And thank you for watching!
@albertludi6098
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much ❤❤
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching, Albert!
@LK-pw7fm
2 жыл бұрын
You're a life-saver =D
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment - and thank you for watching!
@oscarmartinelli9553
3 жыл бұрын
wonderfully explained finally I feel I've really understood the topic. Thanks!!
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching, Oscar!
@nIcO1740NiCo
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great vidéo! I think you just did a little typo fault at the last slide where 2q = 2 - 2q should be 3q = 2 - 2q. But that's just a detail, thanks for the clear explenation of the subject :)
@danielkifletelila764
Жыл бұрын
thanks for help
@KatherineSilzCarson
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching, Daniel!
@abcd-learning6085
Жыл бұрын
thanks
@irmabejdic9402
Жыл бұрын
Hi, the video is great. I am wondering how do you decide that for values of q>2/5 , player should play top and for q
@KatherineSilzCarson
Жыл бұрын
Hi Irma. We know this because when q < 2/5, (see 5:28 or so in the video), the red line is higher than the blue line, which means that player 1's expected payoff from bottom is greater than their expected payoff from top. When q > 2/5, the the blue line is above the red line, meaning that player 1's expected payoff from top is greater than their expected payoff from bottom. You find q = 2/5 by finding where the red line and the blue line cross. To do this, set 3q = 2(1-q) and solve for q. Hope this helps! Thank you for watching!
@jdokk9
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation. So the Mixed strat NE would be written out as [(3/5,2/5),(2/5, 3/5)]?
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
I think how you would write out the equilibrium depends on the notation that your textbook/professor uses. There is no standard notation for this. Sorry I couldn't be of more help!
@nurbatrisyafathima9765
3 жыл бұрын
Hi Katherine, thank you so much for the video! Is it possible to create another video which shows how to find the mixed-strategy Nash Equilibrium for a 3-player game. I can share with you via email the question I'm struggling with.
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
I will add your request to the list - but I might not be able to get to that right away. Feel free to send me your question to my gmail: ksilzcarson@gmail.com.
@nurbatrisyafathima9765
3 жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson Thank you, appreciate it!
@shouryachettri9295
7 ай бұрын
Thank youu 🫶🏻
@KatherineSilzCarson
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@leaogo1106
2 жыл бұрын
how can you get the fraction? like how do you get 2/5 for player 1 and 3/5 for player 2?
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
The way that you get the fractions is to solve for the probabilities that make the other player indifferent between his/her pure strategies. The details are in the video.
@xinnili3658
2 жыл бұрын
I wasted 75 minutes in class. Thank you!
@KatherineSilzCarson
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@530subschallengeimtooclose4
3 жыл бұрын
Please may you explain to me the difference between the infinite one. It's shown here
@KatherineSilzCarson
3 жыл бұрын
There are a few differences. (1) the game I am using in the example is not a prisoner's dilemma game. Usually, it's called "Battle of the Sexes." (2) The one-shot prisoner's dilemma does not have a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. Only a pure strategy equilibrium. In fact the strategy is a dominant strategy for each player. (3) The infinite prisoner's dilemma is a repeated game that goes on forever, not a one-time game. Thus, there are many more possible strategies for each player. The one that usually wins out in the infinitely repeated prisoner's dilemma is called "tit-for-tat" which means that each player chooses to cooperate as long as the other one also cooperates. As soon as one doesn't cooperate, the other exacts a punishment by not cooperating in the next round. Over many repeated plays, this strategy generally generates higher payoffs for a player. Hope this helps - these are really very different types of games.
Пікірлер: 59